Human Capital Investment as an Effective Tool for ... - Ijmbs.com
Human Capital Investment as an Effective Tool for ... - Ijmbs.com
Human Capital Investment as an Effective Tool for ... - Ijmbs.com
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
IJMBS Vo l . 3, Is s u e 1, Ja n - Ma r c h 2013 ISSN : 2230-9519 (Online) | ISSN : 2231-2463 (Print)<br />
Table 10: Computation of the Calculated Chi Square Table (Cal<br />
X 2 )<br />
Table 11: Computation of the Calculated Chi Square Table (Cal<br />
X 2 )<br />
Source: Researcher’s Computation.<br />
From the chi-square table, since the calculated X2 (i.e. 16.955) is<br />
greater th<strong>an</strong> tabulated X2 (i.e. 9.488), we reject the null hypothesis<br />
(H0) <strong>an</strong>d accept the alternative hypothesis (H1). There<strong>for</strong>e, we<br />
conclude that poor funding by the government is responsible <strong>for</strong><br />
the low development of hum<strong>an</strong> capital in Nigeria.<br />
B. Test of Hypothesis II<br />
H O<br />
: Ef<strong>for</strong>ts of the respective governments towards hum<strong>an</strong> capital<br />
investment have not made <strong>an</strong>y signific<strong>an</strong>t impact on labour<br />
efficiency in Nigeria.<br />
Responses <strong>as</strong> given in Table 9 were used in testing the above<br />
hypothesis.<br />
Respondents UNIBEN AAU AUCHI<br />
EKPOMA POLY<br />
Total<br />
Agreed 12 18 15 45<br />
Disagreed 20 17 21 58<br />
Undecided 8 5 4 17<br />
Total 40 40 40 120<br />
Source: Researcher’s Survey, 2012.<br />
The degree of freedom = (R-1) (C-1)<br />
Where R =Rows, C = Columns, thus from the table above<br />
(3 – 1) (3 – 1) = 4<br />
The observed frequencies (O1) of the observations:<br />
O 11<br />
= 12, O 12<br />
= 18, O 13<br />
= 15<br />
O 21<br />
= 20, O 22<br />
= 17, O 23 = 21<br />
O 31<br />
= 8, O 32<br />
= 5, O 33<br />
= 4<br />
The corresponding expected frequencies (E 1<br />
) are <strong>as</strong> follows:<br />
E 11<br />
= 15, E 12<br />
= 15, E 13<br />
= 15<br />
E 21<br />
= 19.3, E 22<br />
= 19.3, E 23<br />
= 19.3<br />
E 31<br />
= 5.7, E32 = 5.7, E 33<br />
= 5.7<br />
12 International Journal of M<strong>an</strong>agement & Business Studies<br />
Source: Researcher’s Computation<br />
From the table above, since the calculated X 2 (i.e. 4.185) is less<br />
th<strong>an</strong> the tabulated X 2 (9.488), we accept the null hypothesis. Thus,<br />
we conclude that ef<strong>for</strong>ts of the respective governments towards<br />
hum<strong>an</strong> capital development have not made signific<strong>an</strong>t impact on<br />
labour efficiency in Nigeria.<br />
C. Discussion of Findings<br />
B<strong>as</strong>ed on our <strong>an</strong>alysis from the results of the chi square<br />
<strong>com</strong>putation, we discovered the following: <strong>Investment</strong> in hum<strong>an</strong><br />
capital h<strong>as</strong> <strong>an</strong> impact on the development of the Nigeri<strong>an</strong> economy;<br />
poor funding by the federal government of Nigeria is a major<br />
problem hindering adequate hum<strong>an</strong> capital investment in Nigeria;<br />
ef<strong>for</strong>ts of the respective governments in Nigeria towards hum<strong>an</strong><br />
capital development have not made signific<strong>an</strong>t impact on labour<br />
efficiency in Nigeria; investment in hum<strong>an</strong> capital h<strong>as</strong> provided<br />
the Nigeri<strong>an</strong> economy with adequate labour <strong>for</strong>ce to carry out its<br />
industrial activities; educational curriculum in the country is not<br />
structured to meet the personnel requirements of the Nigeri<strong>an</strong><br />
economy in the area of industrial <strong>an</strong>d agricultural development;<br />
investment in education by the federal government in Nigeria h<strong>as</strong><br />
not made <strong>an</strong>y improvement on the existing stock of hum<strong>an</strong> capital;<br />
finally, investment in hum<strong>an</strong> capital h<strong>as</strong> created some economic<br />
development <strong>an</strong>d labour efficiency in the Nigeri<strong>an</strong> economy.<br />
V. Conclusion <strong>an</strong>d Re<strong>com</strong>mendations<br />
This paper gave <strong>an</strong> overview of investment in hum<strong>an</strong> capital <strong>an</strong>d<br />
it’s Impact on the development of the Nigeri<strong>an</strong> economy. It focused<br />
on three higher institutions in Edo State, Nigeria i.e. University<br />
of Benin (UNIBEN), Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma (AAU)<br />
<strong>an</strong>d Auchi Polytechnic (AUCHIPOLY) <strong>as</strong> c<strong>as</strong>e studies; it took <strong>an</strong><br />
insight on explorative look at the relationship between investment<br />
in hum<strong>an</strong> capital <strong>an</strong>d development in Nigeria. B<strong>as</strong>ed on our<br />
findings that poor funding by the federal government of Nigeria is<br />
responsible <strong>for</strong> low development of hum<strong>an</strong> capital in Nigeria, <strong>an</strong>d<br />
that ef<strong>for</strong>ts of the respective government towards hum<strong>an</strong> capital<br />
have not made signific<strong>an</strong>t impact on labour efficiency in Nigeria,<br />
hence the following re<strong>com</strong>mendations were proffered: that the<br />
federal government needs to incre<strong>as</strong>e her funding on education<br />
<strong>an</strong>d hum<strong>an</strong> capital development <strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> raise the quality of<br />
education in the country; most <strong>com</strong>p<strong>an</strong>ies operating in the country<br />
should create <strong>an</strong> avenue where their workers are allowed to attend<br />
various training <strong>an</strong>d seminar sessions in order to develop their<br />
www.ijmbs.<strong>com</strong>