28.02.2015 Views

The Tyne Pearl Mussel Project - Freshwater Biological Association

The Tyne Pearl Mussel Project - Freshwater Biological Association

The Tyne Pearl Mussel Project - Freshwater Biological Association

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Tyne</strong> <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Mussel</strong><br />

<strong>Project</strong><br />

Marie-Pierre Gosselin, Louise Lavictoire and Roger<br />

Sweeting<br />

Wednesday 25 January - Rochester Village Hall, Redesdale


<strong>The</strong> <strong>Freshwater</strong> <strong>Biological</strong><br />

<strong>Association</strong> – Introduction<br />

• 2 sites: Windermere and<br />

Dorset<br />

• Identification courses<br />

• Scientific publications<br />

• <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Mussel</strong> Ark project<br />

• Captive breeding<br />

programme<br />

• Research on host<br />

specificity of the<br />

freshwater pearl mussel.


<strong>The</strong> <strong>Tyne</strong> <strong>Pearl</strong> <strong>Mussel</strong> <strong>Project</strong><br />

• October 2010 – December 2012<br />

• Based at FBA; funded by FBA, the Environment<br />

Agency and Northumbrian Water.<br />

• Two aims:<br />

1. Identify the factors responsible for the<br />

decline of the freshwater pearl mussel in the<br />

North <strong>Tyne</strong> catchment.<br />

2. Design a robust, evidence-based restoration<br />

plan for the species in the North <strong>Tyne</strong> and<br />

Rede


Introduction-<strong>Freshwater</strong> pearl<br />

mussel ecology and life cycle<br />

. Lives up to 120 years<br />

. Complex, peculiar life cycle<br />

. Parasitic larval stage on<br />

salmonid host


Habitat requirements of the<br />

freshwater pearl mussel<br />

• Well oxygenated water<br />

• Low calcium concentration<br />

• Oligotrophic rivers<br />

• Location of pearl mussel<br />

beds usually downstream<br />

of riffles<br />

• Ideal substrate: mix of fine<br />

gravel with larger cobble<br />

and boulder.<br />

Gail Butterill


<strong>The</strong> North <strong>Tyne</strong> catchment<br />

* Map courtesy of the <strong>Tyne</strong> Rivers Trust


<strong>The</strong> River Rede<br />

• Main tributary of the river North <strong>Tyne</strong><br />

• 58 Km long<br />

• Geology of carboniferous sandstones with shales covered by<br />

clay and peat.<br />

• Regulated by Catcleugh Reservoir in its upper reaches (1905)<br />

with a minimum compensation flow of 0.158 m 3 s -1 at all times.<br />

• Rede = 33% of entire volume of water in North <strong>Tyne</strong><br />

• Water quality status “good” according to Water Framework<br />

Directive<br />

• Variety of fish species: brown trout, Atlantic salmon, eel,<br />

lamprey, bullhead, stone loach.<br />

• Vast salmonid stocking programme: e.g. 2010: 166,791 young<br />

Atlantic salmon stocked in the Rede ONLY (around 0.5fish/m 2 )


<strong>The</strong> River Rede – fish diversity<br />

• Brown trout<br />

• Eel<br />

• Brook lamprey<br />

• Bullhead<br />

• Atlantic salmon<br />

• Stone loach<br />

www.krisweb.com<br />

davekilbeyphotography.co.uk


Land use in the catchment<br />

Land use<br />

North<br />

<strong>Tyne</strong><br />

Grassland 57 82<br />

Forestry/<br />

woodland<br />

37 17<br />

Arable farmland 4 0<br />

Urban 0 0<br />

Water 2 2<br />

Semi-natural 0 0<br />

Rede<br />

Total 100% 100%<br />

Land<br />

ownership<br />

North <strong>Tyne</strong><br />

Private 67 64<br />

MoD 0 20<br />

Forestry<br />

Commission<br />

Northumbrian<br />

Water<br />

30 15<br />

3 1<br />

Rede<br />

Total 100% 100%<br />

58 discharge consents registered<br />

(Environment Agency). Mostly<br />

“secondary treated sewage to river”<br />

and “septic tanks to river”.


Following the Rede...


<strong>The</strong> freshwater pearl mussel in the<br />

North <strong>Tyne</strong> catchment<br />

• Distribution currently limited to the Rede<br />

and the North <strong>Tyne</strong> downstream of its<br />

confluence with the Rede.<br />

• Estimated population: around 50,000<br />

individuals on both rivers (2006 survey)<br />

• Largest beds: Hindhaigh (499) and<br />

Townhead (286) in 2006.<br />

• Most mussels are 50 to 80 years old<br />

and young mussels are rare.<br />

• No apparent recruitment<br />

• Host fish historically believed to be<br />

Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). No<br />

success from the release of artificially<br />

infected juvenile fish<br />

Kielder<br />

North <strong>Tyne</strong><br />

South <strong>Tyne</strong><br />

River Rede<br />

<strong>Tyne</strong>


So what‟s going wrong?<br />

• Impacted flow regime (Kielder releases)<br />

on the North <strong>Tyne</strong>?<br />

• Changes in land use?<br />

• Pollution?<br />

• Organic enrichment, eutrophication?<br />

• Suspended sediments?<br />

• Siltation and clogging of substrate?<br />

• Host fish density?<br />

• <strong>Pearl</strong> fishing?<br />

• Most mussels are over 80 and young mussels<br />

are rare so it is likely that the factors responsible<br />

for the decline are not recent !


Water Quality Monitoring<br />

• Monthly monitoring by the Environment Agency<br />

- on the North <strong>Tyne</strong> since 1976<br />

- on the Rede since 1990<br />

• Monitoring sites at Cottonshope Foot, Otterburn (1990 to<br />

present) and Redesmouth (1991-2006)<br />

• Parameters recorded included suspended solids, nitrate, ammonia,<br />

dissolved oxygen, orthophosphates, pH and some heavy<br />

metals.<br />

• Problems: - monitoring not frequent enough<br />

- no standardisation on the river and across the<br />

catchment<br />

- no measurements of pesticides levels<br />

- no measurements of suspended sediments, turbidity


Water quality and species<br />

requirements-1<br />

<strong>Biological</strong> Oxygen Demand


Water quality and species<br />

requirements-2<br />

• Suspended solids at Otterburn


Water quality and species<br />

requirements-3<br />

• Nitrate


Water quality and species<br />

requirements-4<br />

• Phosphate


Water quality monitoring July ‟11 –<br />

January „12<br />

• Turbidity


Conclusions from water quality<br />

data analysis<br />

• Enrichment and increase<br />

in fine sediments appear to<br />

be responsible for pearl<br />

mussel decline in the<br />

North <strong>Tyne</strong> and Rede<br />

• Fine sediments from<br />

erosion and runoff<br />

• Enrichment probably as a<br />

result of agriculture and<br />

other human activities.


Causes of sediment input/siltation<br />

• Poaching by livestock<br />

• Dredging of the river<br />

channel<br />

• Topography of the<br />

catchment<br />

• Drainage on arable land<br />

• Forestry activities


Causes of nutrient enrichment in<br />

water<br />

• Agriculture<br />

(fertilizers, drainage,<br />

manure)<br />

• Wastewater<br />

• Untreated sewage


Example of a semi-natural system<br />

www.ecan.govt.nz


Other work and findings<br />

• Host fish preference:<br />

Atlantic salmon/brown trout<br />

• Fieldwork: characterisation<br />

of physical habitat across<br />

the catchment


What we can do to help the pearl<br />

mussel.<br />

HABITAT ACTIONS<br />

• Implement a more comprehensive water<br />

quality monitoring programme<br />

• Limit sediment input in the river<br />

• Prevent nutrient input in the water<br />

• Clean gravels: desilting<br />

PEARL MUSSEL ACTIONS<br />

• Captive breeding programme for adult<br />

relocations<br />

• Release of infected fish in the river


Examples of habitat restoration<br />

Forestry.gov.uk<br />

<strong>Tyne</strong> Rivers Trust<br />

Defra.gov.uk


HE<br />

REDE PEARL<br />

MUSSELS NEED<br />

YOU!!!

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!