01.03.2015 Views

Caste-based discrimination in Nepal - International Dalit Solidarity ...

Caste-based discrimination in Nepal - International Dalit Solidarity ...

Caste-based discrimination in Nepal - International Dalit Solidarity ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Caste</strong>-<strong>based</strong> Discrim<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>in</strong> <strong>Nepal</strong><br />

Krishna B. Bhattachan, Tej B. Sunar and Yasso Kanti Bhattachan(Gauchan)<br />

(Hachhethu 2006). The recent records reveal that <strong>Dalit</strong> representation <strong>in</strong> the<br />

central committees of parties are 2.7% <strong>in</strong> NC, 1.7% <strong>in</strong> NCP-UML, 2.2% <strong>in</strong> NC-D,<br />

and 3.0% <strong>in</strong> CPN-Maoist. <strong>Dalit</strong>s representation is 4% <strong>in</strong> district chapters of<br />

political parties. Table 20.<br />

Table 19: <strong>Caste</strong>/Ethnic Composition of Central Committee Member<br />

<strong>Caste</strong>/Ethnic/<br />

Regional Groups NC NC<br />

(Democratic)<br />

Hill caste<br />

Major Political Parties<br />

CPN RPP People's<br />

(UML)<br />

Front<br />

NWPP NSP Total %<br />

Bahun 18 9 30 9 17 2 0 85 38.3<br />

Chhetri/Thakuri 3 12 2 10 3 2 0 32 14.4<br />

Sanyasi 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 4 1.8<br />

Newar 1 2 6 3 4 5 0 21 9.4<br />

Hill ethnic 4 5 4 7 8 0 0 28 12.7<br />

Terai<br />

3 7 1 5 2 0 31 49 22.1<br />

communities<br />

<strong>Dalit</strong> 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 1.3<br />

Total 29 37 43 34 39 9 31 222 100.0<br />

Source: Adapted from IIDS. 2000. The Fourth Parliament Election, Kathmandu: Institute<br />

for Integrated Development Studies.<br />

Table 20: Parties’ District Level Committees and Representation of <strong>Dalit</strong><br />

<strong>Caste</strong>/<br />

Ethnic<br />

Name of Parties<br />

N. Janmorch CPN(ML) RRP<br />

CPN(UML) <strong>Nepal</strong>i<br />

Congress<br />

Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %<br />

Brahm<strong>in</strong> 17 85.0 6 35.20 5 29.41 7 70.0 4 36.66 39 52.0<br />

Chhetri 2 10.0 5 29.41 7 41.17 1 10.0 3 27.27 18 24.0<br />

Mager 0 0.0 6 35.30 3 17.64 0 0.0 4 36.36 13 17.33<br />

Newar 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 5.88 1 10.0 0 0.0 2 2.66<br />

<strong>Dalit</strong> 1 5.0 0 0.0 1 5.88 1 10.0 0 0.0 3 4<br />

Total 20 100.0 17 100.0 17 99.98 10 100.0 11 99.99 75 99.99<br />

Source: Sunar, 2002<br />

Total<br />

Exist<strong>in</strong>g problems: Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Bidhyanath Koirala, the ma<strong>in</strong> problems of<br />

lower participation of <strong>Dalit</strong>s <strong>in</strong> politics <strong>in</strong>clude predom<strong>in</strong>ant control of political<br />

parties by “upper” caste people; lack of <strong>in</strong>itiatives by political parties to<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease participation and representation of the <strong>Dalit</strong>s; lack of unity among<br />

<strong>Dalit</strong>s, social issues occupy<strong>in</strong>g least priority from the political parties;<br />

predom<strong>in</strong>ance of Brahmanism <strong>in</strong> all political <strong>in</strong>stitutions; lack of political will<br />

for substantial social change; and political parties try<strong>in</strong>g to keep <strong>Dalit</strong><br />

Movements with<strong>in</strong> their control. Similarly Sunar (2002) has also po<strong>in</strong>ted out<br />

that poor economic status of the <strong>Dalit</strong>s, discrim<strong>in</strong>atory caste system, prejudiced<br />

m<strong>in</strong>dset of non-<strong>Dalit</strong>s, elite control <strong>in</strong> decision mak<strong>in</strong>g process, poor educational<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!