Survey Report 2010-1 LA.pdf - NASCOLA
Survey Report 2010-1 LA.pdf - NASCOLA
Survey Report 2010-1 LA.pdf - NASCOLA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ECAT FOUNDATION EXERCISE <strong>2010</strong>-1<br />
INTERNATIONAL EXTERNAL QUALITY ASSESSMENT Page 10 of 12<br />
PROGRAMME IN HAEMOSTASIS AND THROMBOSIS Print date: 08 June <strong>2010</strong><br />
Copyright © <strong>2010</strong> ECAT Foundation<br />
Labcode: 900<br />
ANTICARDIOLIPIN ANTIBODIES<br />
IgG<br />
IgM<br />
50<br />
70<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
Count<br />
10<br />
0<br />
Count<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
10.0<br />
20.0<br />
30.0<br />
40.0<br />
50.0<br />
60.0<br />
> 75<br />
.0<br />
2.0<br />
4.0<br />
6.0<br />
8.0<br />
10.0<br />
12.0<br />
18.0<br />
20.0<br />
> 21<br />
Anticardiolipin IgG (GPL)<br />
Anticardiolipin IgM (MPL)<br />
ANTICARDIOLIPIN (IgG)<br />
n mean CV range your result<br />
Unit: GPL<br />
Total Group 122 28.8 109% 0.0 – 280<br />
INOVA Diagnostics 10 12.0 39.0% 0.0 – 17.0<br />
Orgentec 28 20.2 19.9% 14.3 – 31.0<br />
Phadia 20 51.2 10.6% 40.0 – 63.0<br />
Unit: µg/mL<br />
Total Group 2 0.70 0.63 – 0.76<br />
Unit: Other<br />
Total Group 26 22.2 129% 0.4 – 146.3<br />
ANTICARDIOLIPIN (IgM)<br />
n mean CV Range your result<br />
Unit: MPL<br />
Total Group 104 3.8 276% 0.0 – 104<br />
Orgentec 25 2.3 145% 0.9 – 18.0<br />
Phadia 17 1.2 71.5% 0.1 – 4.2<br />
Unit: µg/mL<br />
Total Group 1 0.45<br />
Unit: Other<br />
Total Group 21 3.6 152% 0.0 – 23.0<br />
Remarks:<br />
Remarkable differences are observed between different methods used for the determination of the<br />
Anticardiolipin IgG antibodies. This results also in a heterogeneous pattern in the classification of this<br />
sample. About 23% classified the sample as negative, while the other participants showed a wide variation<br />
in the classification from borderline to high positive.