03.03.2015 Views

Survey Report 2010-1 LA.pdf - NASCOLA

Survey Report 2010-1 LA.pdf - NASCOLA

Survey Report 2010-1 LA.pdf - NASCOLA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ECAT FOUNDATION EXERCISE <strong>2010</strong>-1<br />

INTERNATIONAL EXTERNAL QUALITY ASSESSMENT Page 10 of 12<br />

PROGRAMME IN HAEMOSTASIS AND THROMBOSIS Print date: 08 June <strong>2010</strong><br />

Copyright © <strong>2010</strong> ECAT Foundation<br />

Labcode: 900<br />

ANTICARDIOLIPIN ANTIBODIES<br />

IgG<br />

IgM<br />

50<br />

70<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

Count<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Count<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

10.0<br />

20.0<br />

30.0<br />

40.0<br />

50.0<br />

60.0<br />

> 75<br />

.0<br />

2.0<br />

4.0<br />

6.0<br />

8.0<br />

10.0<br />

12.0<br />

18.0<br />

20.0<br />

> 21<br />

Anticardiolipin IgG (GPL)<br />

Anticardiolipin IgM (MPL)<br />

ANTICARDIOLIPIN (IgG)<br />

n mean CV range your result<br />

Unit: GPL<br />

Total Group 122 28.8 109% 0.0 – 280<br />

INOVA Diagnostics 10 12.0 39.0% 0.0 – 17.0<br />

Orgentec 28 20.2 19.9% 14.3 – 31.0<br />

Phadia 20 51.2 10.6% 40.0 – 63.0<br />

Unit: µg/mL<br />

Total Group 2 0.70 0.63 – 0.76<br />

Unit: Other<br />

Total Group 26 22.2 129% 0.4 – 146.3<br />

ANTICARDIOLIPIN (IgM)<br />

n mean CV Range your result<br />

Unit: MPL<br />

Total Group 104 3.8 276% 0.0 – 104<br />

Orgentec 25 2.3 145% 0.9 – 18.0<br />

Phadia 17 1.2 71.5% 0.1 – 4.2<br />

Unit: µg/mL<br />

Total Group 1 0.45<br />

Unit: Other<br />

Total Group 21 3.6 152% 0.0 – 23.0<br />

Remarks:<br />

Remarkable differences are observed between different methods used for the determination of the<br />

Anticardiolipin IgG antibodies. This results also in a heterogeneous pattern in the classification of this<br />

sample. About 23% classified the sample as negative, while the other participants showed a wide variation<br />

in the classification from borderline to high positive.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!