05.03.2015 Views

Effective Drug Control: Toward A New Legal Framework

Effective Drug Control: Toward A New Legal Framework

Effective Drug Control: Toward A New Legal Framework

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

III. CONTROLLING PSYCHOACTIVE SUBSTANCES:<br />

THE CURRENT SYSTEM AND ALTERNATIVE MODELS<br />

THE CURRENT SYSTEM OF DRUG CONTROL<br />

The current legal framework for drug control is composed of three legal tiers:<br />

international treaties; federal statutes and regulations; and state statutes and regulations.<br />

The laws at each level function as an interlocking system intended to limit certain<br />

medical uses of drugs, to prevent the diversion of certain drugs for “non-medical” uses<br />

and to enforce the absolute prohibition of the use and sale of certain other drugs.<br />

International Treaties<br />

The United States is a party to three international treaties that provide the basic<br />

legal framework for a worldwide system to control drugs that have been determined to<br />

have a high potential for abuse. 354 The purpose of the treaties is to limit the use of drugs<br />

to medical and scientific purposes only. 355<br />

Most nations are signatories to the U.N. Conventions, which prohibit the use and<br />

sale of the same drugs that are prohibited in the United States. 356 The U.N. conventions<br />

are part of the large body of international law that is not “enforceable” in the traditional<br />

sense, but signatories to the drug control treaties are subject to enormous diplomatic<br />

pressure, particularly from the United States, not to enact national laws that depart from<br />

the prohibition framework. The International Narcotics <strong>Control</strong> Board (INCB), an<br />

independent body within the United Nations, serves more as a panel to monitor adherence<br />

to the U.N. conventions rather than as an enforcement agency, but it often voices support<br />

for or objection to drug policy developments around the world, consistent with prevailing<br />

U.S. domestic and foreign drug policy interests. 357<br />

U.S. <strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Control</strong> – Federal Preemption<br />

The federal government regulates psychoactive substances under a series of<br />

statutory schemes, mainly under Title 21 of the United States Code. These include the<br />

<strong>Control</strong>led Substances Act, the Federal Food, <strong>Drug</strong> and Cosmetic Act and the enabling<br />

acts authorizing the Office of National <strong>Drug</strong> <strong>Control</strong> Policy and the <strong>Drug</strong> Enforcement<br />

Administration. Other miscellaneous federal initiatives found throughout the U.S. Code<br />

address drug use as it relates to other areas of law regulated by the federal government,<br />

including enhanced penalties for use of prohibited drugs in federal prison 358 and federal<br />

aid for state drug courts.<br />

<strong>Control</strong>led Substances Act<br />

The <strong>Control</strong>led Substances Act (CSA) 359 begins with congressional findings that<br />

many drugs being controlled have a legitimate medical purpose, but that the illegal<br />

importation, manufacture, distribution and possession and improper use have “a<br />

substantial and detrimental effect on the health and general welfare of the American<br />

people.” 360 The CSA authorizes the Attorney General to place controlled substances on a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!