16.03.2015 Views

Bulletin of the Sea Fisheries Institute 2 (153) 2001 - CEEMaR

Bulletin of the Sea Fisheries Institute 2 (153) 2001 - CEEMaR

Bulletin of the Sea Fisheries Institute 2 (153) 2001 - CEEMaR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Main phytoplankton assemblages ... 35<br />

ized methods <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Baltic Monitoring Program (Anon. 1988, Anon. 1983, Grassh<strong>of</strong>f et al.<br />

1983). Results are presented in box-and-whisker plots that were made using <strong>the</strong> STATISTICA<br />

program. Each box includes <strong>the</strong> middle 50% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> data (quartile 2 and 3) and <strong>the</strong> median is<br />

marked. The lines below and above <strong>the</strong> box, whiskers, present <strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nonoutliers. The<br />

outliers, located above and below <strong>the</strong> box, present <strong>the</strong> data values 1.5 times greater than <strong>the</strong><br />

interquartile range (Anon. 1997).<br />

RESULTS<br />

Cluster analysis<br />

In order to emphasize <strong>the</strong> most important features <strong>of</strong> phytoplankton diversity in <strong>the</strong> Gulf <strong>of</strong><br />

Gdañsk and <strong>the</strong> Pomeranian Bay, clustering analysis was carried out on all <strong>the</strong> phytoplankton<br />

samples from all <strong>the</strong> cruises in both basins. Ten groups <strong>of</strong> samples were identified at a similarity<br />

level <strong>of</strong> 50% (ig. 3). This means that <strong>the</strong> phytoplankton similarity among samples from different<br />

groups was lower than 50%, while within each group, <strong>the</strong> phytoplankton similarity among<br />

samples was greater than 50%. The groups in igure 3 have been numbered, from <strong>the</strong> most<br />

distinct, with <strong>the</strong> lowest degree <strong>of</strong> similarity, to <strong>the</strong> least distinct, with <strong>the</strong> greatest degree <strong>of</strong><br />

similarity. Table 1 presents <strong>the</strong> location, cruise dates and <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> samples that belong to<br />

each group, and <strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong> chlorophyll-a concentration at <strong>the</strong> stations. The o<strong>the</strong>r columns<br />

present <strong>the</strong> dominant species or <strong>the</strong> higher phytoplankton systematic units (which constitute<br />

about 75% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sample biovolume) and <strong>the</strong>ir percentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> biovolume, as well as <strong>the</strong><br />

20<br />

Bray-Curtis similarity, %<br />

30<br />

40<br />

50<br />

Gulf <strong>of</strong> Gdañsk<br />

JULY 96<br />

JULY 94<br />

AUG. 95<br />

Jul. 96<br />

63<br />

(max S)<br />

NOV. 94<br />

APRIL 94 MAY 97 Nov. 94 Apr. 94 May 97<br />

111 (min S) 111 (min S) 37<br />

FEB. 96<br />

Jul. 94<br />

111 (min S)<br />

Jul. 96<br />

52a (min S)<br />

Pomeranian Bay<br />

JULY 96<br />

MAY 97<br />

Jul. 96<br />

6, 18, 38, 41<br />

(min S)<br />

OCT. 97 MAR. 96<br />

groups<br />

10<br />

9<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5 4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

Fig. 3. Sample groups from particular cruises identified based on cluster analysis. Cruises in bold are those in which<br />

<strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> stations were in a given group; italics identify single stations. Values <strong>of</strong> extreme salinity conditions<br />

are in brackets.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!