17.03.2015 Views

HLA submits comments to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ...

HLA submits comments to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ...

HLA submits comments to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

near-universal health insurance and such actions are unjustifiably<br />

counterproductive <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> establishment of a balanced risk pool of covered<br />

beneficiaries. It is equally concerning that DACA eligibility under <strong>the</strong> DREAM<br />

Act requires that applicants demonstrate enrollment in or completion of<br />

education in <strong>the</strong> United States. 16 While <strong>the</strong> DACA educational criterion is<br />

consistent with <strong>the</strong> United States Supreme Court decision in Plyler v. Doe, 457<br />

U.S. 202 (1982) (holding that children without lawful status are entitled <strong>to</strong> attend<br />

public schools), CMS’s expulsion of <strong>the</strong>se children and young adults results in a<br />

perpetuation of public health concerns in <strong>the</strong> public educational setting.<br />

Moreover, it is quite problematic that DACA applicants who do not meet <strong>the</strong><br />

DREAM Act educational criterion but who have been honorably discharged<br />

from <strong>the</strong> United States military may receive deferred action status; 17 however,<br />

as DACA recipients, <strong>the</strong>y may not receive federally supported coverage under<br />

<strong>the</strong> PCIP program.<br />

Ra<strong>the</strong>r than excluding DACA recipients from Federal health care re<strong>for</strong>m<br />

coverage, CMS should redress <strong>the</strong> consequences of expulsion from deferred<br />

action status and denial of eligibility under <strong>the</strong> PCIP program.<br />

IV.<br />

Conclusion<br />

For <strong>the</strong> reasons identified above, <strong>HLA</strong> advocates <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> inclusiveness of <strong>the</strong><br />

term “lawfully present” under <strong>the</strong> ACA. <strong>HLA</strong> opposes <strong>the</strong> removal of children<br />

and young adults who are DACA recipients from federally- supported health<br />

insurance exchanges.<br />

Accordingly, <strong>HLA</strong> recommends that CMS delete subsection 8 of 45 CFR §<br />

152.2 and provide <strong>the</strong>se children and young adults with equal access <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> PCIP<br />

program.<br />

If you should have any questions, please feel free <strong>to</strong> contact <strong>the</strong> undersigned.<br />

Sincerely,<br />

/s/ Lorianne M. Sainsbury-Wong<br />

Lorianne M. Sainsbury-Wong<br />

Litigation Direc<strong>to</strong>r<br />

Health Law Advocates<br />

30 Winter Street, Suite 1004<br />

Bos<strong>to</strong>n, MA 02108<br />

617-275-2987<br />

sainsbury_wong@hla-inc.org<br />

/s/ Gavriela M. Bogin-Farber<br />

Gavriela M. Bogin-Farber<br />

Legal Fellow<br />

Health Law Advocates<br />

30 Winter Street, Suite 1004<br />

Bos<strong>to</strong>n, MA 02108<br />

617-275-2891<br />

gbogin-farber@hla-inc.org<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!