HLA submits comments to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ...
HLA submits comments to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ...
HLA submits comments to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
near-universal health insurance and such actions are unjustifiably<br />
counterproductive <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> establishment of a balanced risk pool of covered<br />
beneficiaries. It is equally concerning that DACA eligibility under <strong>the</strong> DREAM<br />
Act requires that applicants demonstrate enrollment in or completion of<br />
education in <strong>the</strong> United States. 16 While <strong>the</strong> DACA educational criterion is<br />
consistent with <strong>the</strong> United States Supreme Court decision in Plyler v. Doe, 457<br />
U.S. 202 (1982) (holding that children without lawful status are entitled <strong>to</strong> attend<br />
public schools), CMS’s expulsion of <strong>the</strong>se children and young adults results in a<br />
perpetuation of public health concerns in <strong>the</strong> public educational setting.<br />
Moreover, it is quite problematic that DACA applicants who do not meet <strong>the</strong><br />
DREAM Act educational criterion but who have been honorably discharged<br />
from <strong>the</strong> United States military may receive deferred action status; 17 however,<br />
as DACA recipients, <strong>the</strong>y may not receive federally supported coverage under<br />
<strong>the</strong> PCIP program.<br />
Ra<strong>the</strong>r than excluding DACA recipients from Federal health care re<strong>for</strong>m<br />
coverage, CMS should redress <strong>the</strong> consequences of expulsion from deferred<br />
action status and denial of eligibility under <strong>the</strong> PCIP program.<br />
IV.<br />
Conclusion<br />
For <strong>the</strong> reasons identified above, <strong>HLA</strong> advocates <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> inclusiveness of <strong>the</strong><br />
term “lawfully present” under <strong>the</strong> ACA. <strong>HLA</strong> opposes <strong>the</strong> removal of children<br />
and young adults who are DACA recipients from federally- supported health<br />
insurance exchanges.<br />
Accordingly, <strong>HLA</strong> recommends that CMS delete subsection 8 of 45 CFR §<br />
152.2 and provide <strong>the</strong>se children and young adults with equal access <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> PCIP<br />
program.<br />
If you should have any questions, please feel free <strong>to</strong> contact <strong>the</strong> undersigned.<br />
Sincerely,<br />
/s/ Lorianne M. Sainsbury-Wong<br />
Lorianne M. Sainsbury-Wong<br />
Litigation Direc<strong>to</strong>r<br />
Health Law Advocates<br />
30 Winter Street, Suite 1004<br />
Bos<strong>to</strong>n, MA 02108<br />
617-275-2987<br />
sainsbury_wong@hla-inc.org<br />
/s/ Gavriela M. Bogin-Farber<br />
Gavriela M. Bogin-Farber<br />
Legal Fellow<br />
Health Law Advocates<br />
30 Winter Street, Suite 1004<br />
Bos<strong>to</strong>n, MA 02108<br />
617-275-2891<br />
gbogin-farber@hla-inc.org<br />
4