17.03.2015 Views

Report - Disability Rights Texas

Report - Disability Rights Texas

Report - Disability Rights Texas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

# Provision Assessment of Status Compliance<br />

maintain a medical review system<br />

that consists of non‐Facility<br />

physician case review and<br />

assistance to facilitate the quality of<br />

medical care and performance<br />

improvement.<br />

conducted on 3/31/12. The Monitoring Team requested copies of all internal and<br />

external audit forms, graphs, summaries, action plans, and evidence to support<br />

completion of action plans. In addition, the Facility employs an external physician to<br />

participate at mortality reviews, and to provide feedback on system improvements based<br />

on findings from the mortality review process. The Monitoring Team reviewed the<br />

mortality review summary, administrative reports, hospital records, and the clinical<br />

record of Individual #54.<br />

External Medical Audits<br />

The Monitoring Team noted that only one of the two primary care physicians<br />

participated with the external audit process, and the scores were noted by the<br />

Monitoring Team.<br />

The external audit assessed issues considered essential, and also non‐essential elements.<br />

A current list of each element assessed was not provided to the Monitoring Team for<br />

review. The External audit noted that the physician was 100% compliant with regards to<br />

essential requirements, and no action plans were required to be developed. Two action<br />

plans were developed for Non‐essential elements, and based on evidence provided, both<br />

action plans were not completed at the time of the Monitoring Teams review. The<br />

Monitoring Team was provided with several bar graphs but no summary by the Facility,<br />

so it was not possible to determine the number or percent of cases reviewed, and there<br />

was no information about review of clinical management.<br />

The Monitoring Team noted significant issues with regards to the external medical audit<br />

process. The review process was a specific chart audit process, and because multiple<br />

physicians provided services, such as when cross covering, or on‐call coverage by<br />

alternate physicians, the evaluation process assessed the work of the cross covering<br />

physicians, and not just the physician of record. The process continued to be one that<br />

reviewed mostly administrative process, such as completing assessments, and timely<br />

documentation practices, and did not focus on actual clinical performance. Most<br />

important, although the physician gained 100 percent compliance for essential elements,<br />

the Monitoring Team noted significant areas of deficiency with regards to provision of<br />

medical services, as delineated in Provision L1, of this report.<br />

Mortality Review Process<br />

The Facility had a death since the last compliance visit, which was the first death<br />

reported since the Settlement Agreement was implemented. Individual #54 was a 66<br />

year old female with a history of constipation, bowel obstruction, oral dysphagia, and<br />

was rated at high risk for aspiration. She was admitted to Valley Baptist Hospital due to<br />

fever, vomiting, abdominal distention and absence of bowel movement for two days. She<br />

was diagnosed with bowel obstruction and preparations were being made for an<br />

Rio Grande State Center, November 19, 2012<br />

212

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!