15.11.2012 Views

Dear Friends, I am writing this on Saturday, 28 July, and my mind is ...

Dear Friends, I am writing this on Saturday, 28 July, and my mind is ...

Dear Friends, I am writing this on Saturday, 28 July, and my mind is ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BY ANDREW CARTER,<br />

PASTOR OF THERFIELD CHAPEL, NEAR ROYSTON,<br />

It <strong>is</strong> very easy for Chr<strong>is</strong>tians to fall into the trap<br />

of applying Biblical truth in a highly<br />

individual<strong>is</strong>tic way, usually c<strong>on</strong>fining it to <strong>is</strong>sues<br />

c<strong>on</strong>cerning our pers<strong>on</strong>al salvati<strong>on</strong>. In a<br />

revealing phrase, <strong>on</strong>e of the elders I min<strong>is</strong>ter<br />

al<strong>on</strong>gside calls <str<strong>on</strong>g>th<strong>is</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> approach, “me <strong>and</strong> God<br />

theology.” He <strong>is</strong> getting at the tendency to think<br />

of the Chr<strong>is</strong>tian faith merely in terms of how it<br />

applies to our pers<strong>on</strong>al relati<strong>on</strong>ship with God<br />

rather than as a truth claim, a whole world <strong>and</strong><br />

life view. When we c<strong>on</strong>fine our Chr<strong>is</strong>tian<br />

thinking to a situati<strong>on</strong> with ourselves at the<br />

centre of the “God <strong>is</strong>sue,” we so<strong>on</strong> run the r<strong>is</strong>k<br />

of affirming the secular charge that something<br />

may be true for us, the Chr<strong>is</strong>tian, whilst not<br />

being true for him, the athe<strong>is</strong>t. And before l<strong>on</strong>g,<br />

Chr<strong>is</strong>tianity <strong>is</strong> relegated to where the secular<strong>is</strong>t<br />

wants it to be, merely a creed that helps its<br />

adherents; we need health <strong>and</strong> happiness <strong>and</strong><br />

nice feelings <strong>and</strong> a good marriage <strong>and</strong> what-do<br />

-you-know, God helps with them all.<br />

VALID FOR WHOM?<br />

“Me <strong>and</strong> God theology” manifests itself in<br />

different but related ways. I well remember<br />

talking to a man in L<strong>on</strong>d<strong>on</strong> about Chr<strong>is</strong>tianity<br />

being true. H<strong>is</strong> resp<strong>on</strong>se was both revealing<br />

<strong>and</strong> worrying. He said, “Even if Chr<strong>is</strong>tianity<br />

wasn’t true, I would still believe it.” Chr<strong>is</strong>tianity,<br />

it seems, was something that was valid for him<br />

because of h<strong>is</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>al commitment to it<br />

rather than because it corresp<strong>on</strong>ded to what <strong>is</strong><br />

ENGLAND<br />

really there. He was falling into the trap of<br />

thinking that since Chr<strong>is</strong>tianity gave him good<br />

feelings <strong>and</strong> security, it was therefore helpful to<br />

him <strong>and</strong> worthy of being committed to. What<br />

mattered was that it was “true” (read valid) for<br />

him rather than it having any external authority<br />

bey<strong>on</strong>d h<strong>is</strong> <strong>mind</strong>.<br />

But “me <strong>and</strong> God theology” <strong>is</strong> seen in other<br />

c<strong>on</strong>texts as well. A few years ago <strong>my</strong> wife,<br />

Julie, was talking to her auntie about her<br />

mother (Julie’s gr<strong>and</strong>mother) who was dying of<br />

cancer. Julie remarked that even in death there<br />

<strong>is</strong> hope for those who put their trust in Jesus.<br />

Her auntie replied, “That’s nice if you have that<br />

feeling.” The lady was doing the s<str<strong>on</strong>g>am</str<strong>on</strong>g>e thing as<br />

<strong>my</strong> friend - captured by the mood of the times -<br />

she was assuming that Chr<strong>is</strong>tianity was<br />

something that ex<strong>is</strong>ts in the <strong>mind</strong>s of its<br />

followers as (in <str<strong>on</strong>g>th<strong>is</strong></str<strong>on</strong>g> case) a crutch to ass<strong>is</strong>t in<br />

life’s difficulties. Again it <strong>is</strong> “true” for the <strong>on</strong>e it<br />

helps <strong>and</strong> Chr<strong>is</strong>tianity <strong>is</strong> reduced to a feeling.<br />

Finally, we encounter another species of “me<br />

<strong>and</strong> God theology” when we hear people say<br />

something al<strong>on</strong>g the lines of “I like to think of<br />

God like x” or “I d<strong>on</strong>’t like Chr<strong>is</strong>tianity’s God; I<br />

prefer to think of him in the following way …”<br />

The assumpti<strong>on</strong> <strong>is</strong> that we define God; he’s a<br />

God (read god) for us, made according to our<br />

designs. The point <strong>is</strong> that God <strong>and</strong> truth, like<br />

beauty, are in the eye of the beholder, things<br />

we create for ourselves. We are children of the<br />

postmodern world.<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!