21.03.2015 Views

Fundamentals Training - S. Newell and J. Weiss Presentation - WSPP

Fundamentals Training - S. Newell and J. Weiss Presentation - WSPP

Fundamentals Training - S. Newell and J. Weiss Presentation - WSPP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Western Market <strong>Fundamentals</strong><br />

Implications of New Renewables<br />

February 26, 2012<br />

Sam <strong>Newell</strong> <strong>and</strong> Jurgen <strong>Weiss</strong><br />

The Brattle Group<br />

Presented at:<br />

<strong>WSPP</strong>’s Joint EC/OC Meeting<br />

La Costa Resort, Carlsbad, CA<br />

Copyright © 2011 The Brattle Group, Inc.<br />

Views expressed in these slides are solely those of the author unless referred otherwise.<br />

www.brattle.com<br />

Antitrust/Competition Commercial Damages Environmental Litigation <strong>and</strong> Regulation Forensic Economics Intellectual Property International Arbitration<br />

International Trade Product Liability Regulatory Finance <strong>and</strong> Accounting Risk Management Securities Tax Utility Regulatory Policy <strong>and</strong> Ratemaking Valuation<br />

Electric Power Financial Institutions Natural Gas Petroleum Pharmaceuticals, Medical Devices, <strong>and</strong> Biotechnology Telecommunications <strong>and</strong> Media Transportation


Agenda<br />

♦ Recent Prices <strong>and</strong> Market Heat Rates<br />

♦ Key <strong>Fundamentals</strong> Looking Forward<br />

♦ Major Driver: New Renewables<br />

♦ Impacts of Renewables on Markets<br />

♦ Takeaways for Traders<br />

2


Electricity Prices at Major WECC Hubs (2007-2012)<br />

$/MWh<br />

$/MWh<br />

Daily On-Peak<br />

$160<br />

$140<br />

$120<br />

$100<br />

$80<br />

$60<br />

$40<br />

$20<br />

$0<br />

Jun-07 Jun-08 Jun-09 Jun-10 Jun-11<br />

Daily Off-Peak<br />

$160<br />

$140<br />

$120<br />

$100<br />

$80<br />

$60<br />

$40<br />

$20<br />

$0<br />

Jun-07 Jun-08 Jun-09 Jun-10 Jun-11<br />

3<br />

Mid C<br />

NP-15<br />

SP-15<br />

Palo Verde<br />

Mid C<br />

NP-15<br />

SP-15<br />

Palo Verde


Market Heat Rates at Major WECC Hubs (2007-2012)<br />

Btu/kWh<br />

Btu/kWh<br />

20,000<br />

Daily On-Peak<br />

18,000<br />

16,000<br />

14,000<br />

12,000<br />

10,000<br />

8,000<br />

6,000<br />

4,000<br />

2,000<br />

0<br />

Jun-07 Jun-08 Jun-09 Jun-10 Jun-11<br />

20,000<br />

Daily Off-Peak<br />

18,000<br />

16,000<br />

14,000<br />

12,000<br />

10,000<br />

8,000<br />

6,000<br />

4,000<br />

2,000<br />

0<br />

Jun-07 Jun-08 Jun-09 Jun-10 Jun-11<br />

Mid C<br />

NP-15<br />

SP-15<br />

Palo Verde<br />

Mid C<br />

NP-15<br />

SP-15<br />

Palo Verde<br />

4


Key Fundamental Factors Looking Forward<br />

DEMAND<br />

SUPPLY<br />

• Load growth<br />

tempered by energy<br />

efficiency<br />

• Resource adequacy<br />

requirements <strong>and</strong><br />

procurement<br />

• RPS targets <strong>and</strong><br />

procurement<br />

• Low gas prices<br />

• Renewables for RPS<br />

• Environmental<br />

retirements<br />

• Hydro variability<br />

• Cap <strong>and</strong> trade<br />

The biggest changes will come from planned <strong>and</strong> future renewables<br />

5


Dem<strong>and</strong> Projections for Renewable Energy<br />

Annual Renewable Dem<strong>and</strong> (GWh)<br />

State RPS Requirements in WECC (% of Retail Load)<br />

State 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020<br />

Arizona 3.0% 3.5% 4.0% 4.5% 5.0% 6.0% 7.0% 8.0% 9.0% 10.0%<br />

California 18.0% 19.0% 20.0% 21.7% 23.3% 25.0% 27.0% 29.0% 31.0% 33.0%<br />

Colorado 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 12.0% 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 30.0%<br />

Idaho 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%<br />

Montana 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% 15.0%<br />

New Mexico 10.0% 11.7% 13.3% 15.0% 15.0% 16.0% 17.0% 18.0% 19.0% 20.0%<br />

Nevada 15.0% 15.0% 18.0% 18.0% 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 22.0%<br />

Oregon 5.0% 7.5% 10.0% 12.5% 15.0% 16.0% 17.0% 18.0% 19.0% 20.0%<br />

Utah 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%<br />

Washington 1.5% 3.0% 4.5% 6.0% 7.5% 9.0% 10.5% 12.0% 13.5% 15.0%<br />

Wyoming 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%<br />

TOTAL 10.2% 11.1% 12.2% 13.3% 15.2% 16.3% 17.5% 18.7% 19.9% 22.1%<br />

200,000<br />

180,000<br />

160,000<br />

140,000<br />

120,000<br />

100,000<br />

80,000<br />

60,000<br />

40,000<br />

20,000<br />

0<br />

Annual Dem<strong>and</strong> for Renewable Energy<br />

2011<br />

2012<br />

2013<br />

2014<br />

2015<br />

2016<br />

2017<br />

2018<br />

2019<br />

2020<br />

Washington<br />

Oregon<br />

Nevada<br />

New Mexico<br />

Montana<br />

Colorado<br />

California<br />

Arizona<br />

♦ Dem<strong>and</strong> driven by state RPS<br />

♦ Existing dem<strong>and</strong> is about 80,000<br />

GWh (~11% of system load)<br />

♦ Requirements increase over time<br />

• 115,000 GWh by 2015 (~15% of load)<br />

• 177,000 GWh in 2020 (~22% of load)<br />

♦ CA dem<strong>and</strong> > 60% of total<br />

Sources <strong>and</strong> Notes:<br />

[1] RPS requirements based on most recent state rules <strong>and</strong> regulations; Voluntary goals in UT are not included;<br />

RPS requirements are interpolated based on interim targets for CA, OR, NM, <strong>and</strong> WA.<br />

[2] Dem<strong>and</strong> calculations based on EIA electricity sales for 2010 <strong>and</strong> 1.2%/yr growth rate; Grossed up by 8% for T&D losses<br />

6


Supply Projections for Renewable Energy in WECC<br />

MW<br />

18,000<br />

16,000<br />

14,000<br />

12,000<br />

10,000<br />

8,000<br />

6,000<br />

4,000<br />

2,000<br />

0<br />

Existing & Planned Renewable Supply<br />

Arizona<br />

California<br />

Colorado<br />

Idaho<br />

Partially Permitted<br />

Testing, Under Constr. & Site Prep<br />

Existing<br />

Montana<br />

Nevada<br />

New Mexico<br />

Oregon<br />

Utah<br />

Washington<br />

Wyoming<br />

Planned Renewable Capacity Additions<br />

by Technology<br />

♦ ~22 GW of existing RPS-qualified capacity<br />

• 1/2 in CA<br />

• 2/3 wind<br />

♦ ~14 GW more planned by 2015<br />

• Mostly solar <strong>and</strong> wind<br />

• Suffices to meet 2015 RPS dem<strong>and</strong><br />

♦ Much more needed in 2015-20 for RPS<br />

• 25-35 GW, depending on types<br />

• Depends on costs <strong>and</strong> state/federal policies<br />

Source: Calculated based on unit data compiled by Ventyx, the Velocity Suite<br />

(as of February, 2012).<br />

7


Renewables Likely to Maintain Low Energy Prices<br />

100,000<br />

80,000<br />

Changes in Key Factors Relative to 2007<br />

WECC Renewable<br />

Generation<br />

60,000<br />

40,000<br />

WECC Load<br />

GWh<br />

20,000<br />

0<br />

BPA Hydro<br />

-20,000<br />

-40,000<br />

Load Net of<br />

BPA Hydro <strong>and</strong><br />

Renewable Gen<br />

-60,000<br />

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018<br />

Sources: Estimated based on data from EIA, Ventyx, BPA, TEPPC.<br />

8


Substantial Amounts of PV Can Have Dramatic<br />

Impacts on Peak Prices – Germany Example<br />

German Power Market July 16, 2011<br />

♦ Germany installing a lot of solar<br />

♦ Price impacts illustrated on 7/16/2011<br />

• Solar generation (yellow) removed the<br />

“peakiness” of residual load<br />

• Resulting hourly prices (red on middle<br />

graph) were almost completely flat<br />

• Compared to a “typical” summer day<br />

(7/16/2009 – red line in lower graph)<br />

German Power Market July 16, 2009<br />

♦ This is being lauded as the “price<br />

suppression benefit of solar” <strong>and</strong> as<br />

destroying the energy margins of<br />

fossil generation<br />

Sources: Solarserver.de; EEX<br />

9


Implications for System Operations<br />

Western Wind <strong>and</strong> Solar Integration Study<br />

(WWSIS) for WestConnect, Phase 1 (2010)<br />

Like other renewable integration studies,<br />

found challenges w/high penetration<br />

Found WestConnect can accommodate<br />

30% wind <strong>and</strong> 5% solar with:<br />

♦ Coordinating commitment <strong>and</strong> dispatch<br />

regionally, across balancing areas<br />

♦ Sub-hourly scheduling <strong>and</strong> transmission<br />

♦ Integrating forecasts into dispatch <strong>and</strong><br />

operations<br />

♦ Committing additional operating reserves<br />

♦ Exploiting flexibility from conventional<br />

generation (cycling/ramping) <strong>and</strong> renewable<br />

generation (ramping down)<br />

Sources: NREL, Stakeholder Webinar May 19, 2011 WWSIS Phase 2<br />

10


Implications for Market Ops & Structures – Next Steps<br />

WWSIS Phase 2 is underway:<br />

♦ Analyze wear & tear impacts on<br />

thermal units; mitigation options<br />

♦ Emission impacts <strong>and</strong> optimal unit<br />

commitment <strong>and</strong> economic dispatch<br />

The PUC Energy Imbalance Market (EIM)<br />

Group is working on formalizing Western<br />

balancing area cooperation:<br />

♦ Commissioners from AZ, CA, CO, ID,<br />

MT, NV, NM, OR, TX, UT, WA, WY<br />

♦ Actively investigating the costs <strong>and</strong><br />

benefits of a regional sub-hourly EIM<br />

CAISO proposing “resource adequacy”<br />

requirements for flexible capacity<br />

Such efforts may provide opportunities<br />

for flexible generation to earn additional<br />

revenues (but wear & tear on units)<br />

Sources: NREL, Stakeholder Webinar May 19, 2011 WWSIS Phase 2<br />

11


Takeaways for Traders<br />

♦ Renewable development is one of the biggest<br />

fundamental drivers in the West<br />

♦ New renewables are likely to more than offset the energy<br />

price impact of load growth (<strong>and</strong> of an expected return to<br />

normal hydro conditions)<br />

• Solar can depress prices especially on-peak<br />

• Wind can depress prices especially off-peak<br />

♦ Wind <strong>and</strong> solar variability <strong>and</strong> unpredictability will require<br />

a more flexible system<br />

• Opportunities for flexible fossil generation<br />

12


About The Brattle Group<br />

The Brattle Group provides consulting <strong>and</strong> expert testimony in economics, finance, <strong>and</strong><br />

regulation to corporations, law firms, <strong>and</strong> governmental agencies around the world.<br />

We combine in-depth industry experience, rigorous analyses, <strong>and</strong> principled techniques<br />

to help clients answer complex economic <strong>and</strong> financial questions in litigation <strong>and</strong><br />

regulation, develop strategies for changing markets, <strong>and</strong> make critical business decisions.<br />

Climate Change Policy <strong>and</strong> Planning<br />

Cost of Capital<br />

Dem<strong>and</strong> Forecasting<br />

Dem<strong>and</strong> Response <strong>and</strong> Energy Efficiency<br />

Electricity Market Modeling<br />

Energy Asset Valuation<br />

Energy Contract Litigation<br />

Environmental Compliance<br />

Fuel <strong>and</strong> Power Procurement<br />

Incentive Regulation<br />

Rate Design, Cost Allocation, <strong>and</strong> Rate Structure<br />

Regulatory Strategy <strong>and</strong> Litigation Support<br />

Renewables<br />

Resource Planning<br />

Retail Access <strong>and</strong> Restructuring<br />

Risk Management<br />

Market-Based Rates<br />

Market Design <strong>and</strong> Competitive Analysis<br />

Mergers <strong>and</strong> Acquisitions<br />

Transmission<br />

Sam <strong>Newell</strong> (sam.newell@brattle.com), Jurgen <strong>Weiss</strong> (jurgen.weiss@brattle.com)<br />

44 Brattle Street, Cambridge, MA 02138<br />

617-864-7900 (www.brattle.com)<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!