22.03.2015 Views

Minerva, Spring 2008 (Volume 32) - Citizens for Global Solutions

Minerva, Spring 2008 (Volume 32) - Citizens for Global Solutions

Minerva, Spring 2008 (Volume 32) - Citizens for Global Solutions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

For the poor, however, the major source<br />

of insecurity is their own poverty, and the<br />

social conditions that accompany poverty:<br />

ill-health, illiteracy, exclusion and<br />

inequality, including gender inequality. For<br />

example, World Bank research shows that<br />

poor women’s greatest fear is ill-health;<br />

and a health crisis is the cause most often<br />

cited by families who have fallen into<br />

destitution.<br />

As experience constantly reminds us –<br />

from the global HIV/AIDS epidemic to the<br />

hunger crisis … – individual insecurity on<br />

a large enough scale becomes a threat to<br />

national, regional and even global security.<br />

And extreme poverty is on a vast scale:<br />

over a billion people live on less than a<br />

euro a day. Three billion people, half the<br />

world’s population, live on less than two<br />

euros a day.<br />

All these issues, and many more, are<br />

well documented. They are the subject of<br />

endless discussion at all levels. There are<br />

solid international agreements on how to<br />

approach them. Yet somehow the political<br />

will to respond is lacking. Governments<br />

look first – and often only – at their narrow<br />

self-interest. The international response is<br />

accordingly weak and hesitant.<br />

To give only two examples of this failure<br />

of political will: first, world military<br />

expenditure in 2004 was over $1,000 billion,<br />

or 2.6 per cent of global GNP. One<br />

country was responsible <strong>for</strong> nearly half of<br />

that total. Second, in the same year, global<br />

expenditure on international development<br />

assistance from all countries was under<br />

$80 billion. These grossly disproportionate<br />

figures reflect the distorted realities we<br />

live with. The major underlying threats to<br />

security are social, while the overwhelming<br />

bulk of expenditure on security is<br />

military.<br />

Security as a Social Issue<br />

I would like to make three brief points.<br />

• First, human security is essential <strong>for</strong> security<br />

in the broader sense. Better health,<br />

education and moves to reduce gender inequality<br />

help to defeat poverty, exclusion,<br />

powerlessness and deprivation. This in turn<br />

reduces the sense of oppression and injustice,<br />

and denies extremism and conflict the<br />

conditions in which they flourish.<br />

• Second, guaranteeing human security<br />

does not require any new or unusual actions,<br />

nor any especially expensive inputs.<br />

There is a road map, in the <strong>for</strong>m of the<br />

Millennium Development Goals and other<br />

international instruments.<br />

• Finally, all nations must consider their<br />

response to the question of national<br />

security versus human security. The response<br />

includes new thinking on <strong>for</strong>ms of<br />

governance, economic relationships and<br />

international co-operation: it also supports<br />

the multilateral approach to consensusbuilding<br />

through the United Nations.<br />

Protecting national borders no longer guarantees<br />

security. Each nation has to arrive at<br />

a vision of community that includes all its<br />

people, the poor as well as the better-off;<br />

and all its neighbours, in whatever part of<br />

the world they may be. Security demands a<br />

new commitment to multilateralism, and to<br />

the value of the individual human being.<br />

To take these points in order:<br />

Deep and pervasive poverty is an ancient<br />

problem, and to a great extent all societies<br />

have accepted it as inevitable. The<br />

traditions of all cultures, including the<br />

prevailing liberal economic theory, call <strong>for</strong><br />

assistance to the poor; but liberal economics<br />

assumes, in common with all other traditions,<br />

that poverty and inequality are part<br />

of the normal social and economic order.<br />

The realities of the 21st century demand a<br />

closer look at this assumption.<br />

In the last third of the last century, the<br />

most successful developing economies in<br />

Asia and Latin America invested heavily<br />

in social programmes, including universal,<br />

free education <strong>for</strong> both sexes, and in health<br />

care, including reproductive health.<br />

A study by the Royal Institute <strong>for</strong> International<br />

Affairs in London confirms that there<br />

is a two-way relationship between economic<br />

growth and health: “Life expectancy<br />

and adult survival rates exercise a positive<br />

impact on human capital <strong>for</strong>mation and<br />

hence on economic growth. In turn, sustained<br />

growth rates allow <strong>for</strong> better health<br />

5 • <strong>Minerva</strong> #<strong>32</strong> • June <strong>2008</strong><br />

conditions.” In plain language, that means<br />

that healthy people make better workers,<br />

better workers make stronger economies,<br />

and stronger economies allow people to<br />

live better and make good choices.<br />

More specifically, the research of Nancy<br />

Birdsall and Steven Sinding has shown<br />

how better reproductive health, smaller<br />

families and slower population growth,<br />

together with universal education, were<br />

part of the reason <strong>for</strong> the explosive growth<br />

of the East Asian “tiger economies” in the<br />

1980s and 90s.<br />

Amartya Sen has shown how democratic<br />

institutions – and particularly the inclusion<br />

of women in the political process<br />

– contribute to more equitable development.<br />

Among other things, women tend<br />

to focus on the essentials of education<br />

and health care. Sri Lanka, Kerala and<br />

some other states in India, have provided<br />

examples of how to achieve high literacy,<br />

low maternal and child mortality, smaller<br />

families and broader life choices, even in<br />

a low-income setting. The most important<br />

factor was not ample resources so much<br />

as a perception that human security was<br />

of primary importance.<br />

That leads me to my second point: there<br />

is a clear and detailed road map to human<br />

security. The road leads through social investment,<br />

through ending extreme poverty,<br />

to equitable development.<br />

I was a member of the Secretary-General’s<br />

High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges<br />

and Change. After considerable research<br />

and discussion, we concluded that development<br />

is the indispensable foundation<br />

<strong>for</strong> a collective security system, first, to<br />

combat poverty, infectious disease and<br />

environmental degradation which threaten<br />

human security; second, to maintain states’<br />

capacity to meet threats to security; and<br />

finally, to address the environment in<br />

which terrorism and organised crime can<br />

flourish.<br />

The Panel recognised that there were<br />

many obstacles to the efficient delivery of<br />

resources <strong>for</strong> development, including fair<br />

treatment <strong>for</strong> poor countries in matters<br />

such as trade and debt relief. There is also<br />

an urgent need <strong>for</strong> better co-ordination

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!