24.03.2015 Views

Experiment V - Educomp Online

Experiment V - Educomp Online

Experiment V - Educomp Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Experiment</strong> V<br />

AIM: To determine the major problem areas of the subject’s adjustment using the Adjustment Inventory<br />

for School Students (AISS)<br />

BASIC CONCEPT:<br />

1) Concept of adjustment (cbse.nic.in)<br />

a. Freud’s concept described mental health in terms of expressing oneself in love and work. A well<br />

adjusted person finds fulfillment on both aspe<br />

b. Erik Erikson’s concept: considered adjustment as the life long process which was the basis of mental<br />

health being mastery of crises at successive life stages.<br />

c. Maslow's concept: evaluated a well adjusted person whose goal is of self actualization.<br />

3) Stress, definition, sources (from text book)<br />

4) Promoting positive health and well-being (from text book)<br />

Methodology:<br />

. PRELIMINARIES–<br />

b. Name of Subject<br />

c. Age<br />

d. Sex<br />

e. General condition of subject<br />

f. Date<br />

g. Place of test conduction<br />

. MATERIALS REQUIRED<br />

a. AISS Manual<br />

b. AISS answer sheet<br />

c. Manual<br />

d. Watch<br />

e. Pencil<br />

f. Eraser<br />

. Description of test<br />

a. Name – Adjustment Inventory for School Students<br />

b. Author – AKP Sinha and RP Sinha<br />

c. Edition – 1951<br />

The inventory was designed in Hindi for use with Hindi-knowing students of India. The inventory seeks to<br />

segregate well-adjusted secondary students (ages 14-18) from poorly adjusted ones in the areas of<br />

Emotional, Social, and Educational adjustment.


A list of 100 questions indicating the significant problems of school students in the three areas was<br />

prepared. The questions are to be answered with a yes, or a no.<br />

Psychometric Properties.<br />

1. Reliability<br />

b. The coefficient of reliability was found by using the<br />

i. Split half method<br />

ii. Test retest method<br />

The coefficient of the test and subtest ranged between 0.90 and 0.96<br />

2. Validity<br />

a. The validity coefficients were determined for each item<br />

3. Standardisation<br />

a. Percentile norms were computed for both males and females in all 3 areas of adjustments separately<br />

and for the entire inventory. The subject can be classified into 5 categories with raw scores attained by<br />

them on the inventory.<br />

b. Categories are –<br />

i. Excellent<br />

ii. Good<br />

iii. Average<br />

iv. Unsatisfactory<br />

v. Very unsatisfactory<br />

4. The meanings of these scores are as follows –<br />

a. Emotional Adjustment – High scores indicate unstable emotions. Students with a low score tend to be<br />

more emotionally stable.<br />

b. Social Adjustment – Individuals scoring very high are submissive and retiring. Low scored indicate an<br />

aggressive personality.<br />

c. Educational Adjustment – Individuals scoring high are poorly adjusted with their curriculum and cocurricular<br />

programs. People with low scores are interested in school programs.<br />

. Process of Test Administration<br />

a. RAPPORT FORMATION AND INSTRUCTION – Copy from answer sheet.<br />

b. Precautions<br />

i. Aim of test must not be revealed<br />

ii. Room should be quiet and well-lit<br />

iii. Confidentiality of test results must be maintained<br />

iv. The statements must all be answered and none should be left out<br />

c. CONDUCTION<br />

i. The subject was brought to the laboratory and a rapport was formed.<br />

ii. Subject was made to feel comfortable.<br />

iii. The subject was asked to answer a set of questions, giving the first natural response.<br />

iv. At the end, the subject’s introspective report was recorded.


d. Introspective report:<br />

e. Behavioural Observation:<br />

. DATA – attached on facing page<br />

. SCORING<br />

i. The scoring can be done by hand<br />

ii. For every answer that indicates adjustment, a score of zero was given.<br />

iii. For every answer that does not indicate adjustment, a score of one is given.<br />

iv. The scores are added to get the raw scores.<br />

v. The total score indicates the subject’s general adjustment<br />

vi. The scores are interpreted using adjustment categories as implied in the manual.<br />

. RESULTS table – Make table on the facing page DIMENSION SCORE INTERPRETATION<br />

INTERPRETATION – Definition of Adjustment, Describe each area and give score, its interpretation<br />

and examples from the answer sheet, give overall score and explain level of adjustment.<br />

CONCLUSION:<br />

a. Using AISS, the subject was found to have ------adjustment levels.<br />

REFERENCES:<br />

a. NCERT Psychology for Class XII, AISS Manual

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!