Impact of Hydraulic Fracturing on Water Resources: Assessing the ...

ePAPER READ

DOWNLOAD ePAPER

cwfnc.org

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

START NOW

o apparent chemical contamination: no differences between

active to non active wells

Methane source? Non-active Active A distinction between active wells with thermogenic isotopic fingerprint and nonactive wells with a mixed composition Non-active Active

o apparent chemical contamination: no differences between active to non active wells

Page 1 and 2: Impact of<
Page 4 and 5: The Marcellus Shale, Appalachian Ba
Page 6 and 7: Montrose, Susquehanna, Pennsylvania
Page 8 and 9: Major stages in shale gas productio
Page 10: Key environmental risks associated
Page 15 and 16: Proceedings of nat
Page 17 and 18: Hydro-geological cross section
Page 19: Isotopic fingerprinting of<
Page 23: The toxicity of pr
Page 27 and 28: What’s in produced water? • Sal
Page 29 and 30: Research in orth Carolina 1. Work w

Impact of Hydraulic Fracturing on Water Resources: Assessing the ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?