25.03.2015 Views

Inoculation Technologies to Improve the Nodulation of ... - Lupins.org

Inoculation Technologies to Improve the Nodulation of ... - Lupins.org

Inoculation Technologies to Improve the Nodulation of ... - Lupins.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

DEPARTMENT OF<br />

PRIMARY INDUSTRIES<br />

<strong>Inoculation</strong> <strong>Technologies</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Improve</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Nodulation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Lupins</strong> and o<strong>the</strong>r Grain<br />

Legumes in South-eastern Australia<br />

Dr Mat<strong>the</strong>w Den<strong>to</strong>n<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Primary Industries,<br />

Ru<strong>the</strong>rglen


DEPARTMENT OF<br />

PRIMARY INDUSTRIES<br />

Outline<br />

• The importance <strong>of</strong> legumes <strong>to</strong> farming systems<br />

• Inoculant types in <strong>the</strong> Australian system<br />

• Efficacy <strong>of</strong> liquid and granular inoculants<br />

• Potential advantages <strong>of</strong> soil-applied inoculants<br />

2


DEPARTMENT OF<br />

PRIMARY INDUSTRIES<br />

Australian agriculture is highly<br />

reliant on nitrogen inputs<br />

Nitrogen fertilisers - <strong>the</strong><br />

single most energy<br />

expensive input in<br />

agriculture<br />

accounts for 35-68% <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>to</strong>tal on-farm energy<br />

use<br />

Chen et al. 2008 Aust J Soil Res 46, 289-301


DEPARTMENT OF<br />

PRIMARY INDUSTRIES<br />

Energy Efficiency <strong>of</strong> Fertiliser vs Legume N<br />

Energy intensive<br />

30 GJ t - 1 NH 3<br />

4 kg CO 2 emitted / kg<br />

N produced<br />

Pho<strong>to</strong>syn<strong>the</strong>tically-<br />

driven N fertiliser<br />

Effectively no CO 2<br />

emission


DEPARTMENT OF<br />

PRIMARY INDUSTRIES<br />

N provided by lupins<br />

Crop type<br />

Mean N<br />

balance<br />

(kg N/ha)<br />

Range<br />

(kg N/ha)<br />

Ref<br />

Lupin 88 70-107 Evans 2001<br />

Lupin 78 (-29) -247 Evans 1987,<br />

1989<br />

Lupin 97 174-177 Rochester<br />

1998<br />

Lupin 65 32 - 96 Unkovich<br />

1994<br />

• In addition, 30% <strong>of</strong> Total plant N is BG at harvest<br />

McNeill et al. 2008 Plant & Soil, 302:297-


DEPARTMENT OF<br />

PRIMARY INDUSTRIES<br />

Peat Inoculants<br />

• Industry standard<br />

for Australia<br />

• High quality<br />

• >10 9 cells g -1 peat<br />

• Applied as a slurry<br />

or a liquid


DEPARTMENT OF<br />

PRIMARY INDUSTRIES<br />

Granular Inoculants<br />

Granular inoculants<br />

• Introduced in<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Australian market for ~5 years<br />

• Carriers: peat, or clays (usually ben<strong>to</strong>nite, attapulgite<br />

• Non-sterile formulations (unlike peat slurries)


DEPARTMENT OF<br />

PRIMARY INDUSTRIES<br />

Freeze-dried inoculants<br />

Applied as:<br />

1) slurry <strong>to</strong><br />

seed, or<br />

2) liquid in<strong>to</strong><br />

furrows


DEPARTMENT OF<br />

PRIMARY INDUSTRIES<br />

How do granular and liquid<br />

inoculants differ <strong>to</strong> peat slurries?<br />

• Peat slurry inoculants are applied <strong>to</strong> SEED<br />

• Granules and liquid inoculants are applied <strong>to</strong> SOIL<br />

• Soil inoculation:<br />

1. Avoids incompatibility with seed <strong>to</strong>xins (fungicides, insecticides)<br />

2. Avoids <strong>the</strong> need <strong>to</strong> inoculate seed<br />

3. No time dependency when unfavourable conditions disrupt<br />

sowing<br />

4. Potential for dry sowing conditions<br />

9


DEPARTMENT OF<br />

PRIMARY INDUSTRIES<br />

Seed inoculation Soil inoculation<br />

Peat inoculant<br />

on <strong>the</strong> seed<br />

Granular<br />

inoculant in<br />

<strong>the</strong> seed row<br />

Few large nodules<br />

close <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> crown<br />

Several medium<br />

nodules on<br />

crown and<br />

lateral roots<br />

Slide courtesy <strong>of</strong> New<strong>to</strong>n Lupwayi


DEPARTMENT OF<br />

PRIMARY INDUSTRIES<br />

Chickpeas (Kyei-Boahen et al., 2001)<br />

Treatment<br />

Nodule dry weight (mg/plant)<br />

Crown Lateral Total<br />

Control 0.0 3.0 3.0<br />

Liquid 9.5 16.0 25.5<br />

Peat 193.3 70.8 264.0<br />

Granular 80.3 163.0 243.3<br />

Slide courtesy <strong>of</strong> New<strong>to</strong>n Lupwayi


DEPARTMENT OF<br />

PRIMARY INDUSTRIES<br />

Chickpeas (Kyei-Boahen et al., 2001)<br />

Treatment %Ndfa Grain yield<br />

(t/ha)<br />

Control 17.2 1.22<br />

Liquid 19.9 1.52<br />

Peat 49.1 1.81<br />

Granular 56.9 1.81<br />

Slide courtesy <strong>of</strong> New<strong>to</strong>n Lupwayi


DEPARTMENT OF<br />

PRIMARY INDUSTRIES<br />

What is <strong>the</strong> efficacy <strong>of</strong> granular and<br />

liquid inoculants in Australia?<br />

•37 experiments over 5 years in Vic, SA and<br />

sou<strong>the</strong>rn NSW<br />

•Efficacy <strong>of</strong> granular and liquid inoculants tested<br />

•<strong>Lupins</strong>, faba beans, peas, chickpeas and lentils<br />

13


DEPARTMENT OF<br />

PRIMARY INDUSTRIES<br />

Site distribution


DEPARTMENT OF<br />

PRIMARY INDUSTRIES<br />

What difference does soil<br />

inoculation make?<br />

15


DEPARTMENT OF<br />

PRIMARY INDUSTRIES<br />

Crown nodulation,<br />

typical <strong>of</strong> peat slurry<br />

inoculants<br />

Crown and Deep<br />

nodules from effective<br />

granular and liquid<br />

inoculants<br />

10 mm<br />

Chickpeas, Inverleigh, 2007


17<br />

Liquid inoculant seed<br />

Liquid injection<br />

DEPARTMENT OF<br />

PRIMARY INDUSTRIES<br />

Nodule number<br />

18<br />

15<br />

12<br />

9<br />

6<br />

3<br />

Nodule number (plant -1 )<br />

Uninoculated<br />

Peat inoculant<br />

Granules B 5<br />

Granules B 10<br />

Granules B 10 Undersown<br />

Granules A 5<br />

Granules A 10<br />

Granules A 10 Undersown<br />

0<br />

<strong>Lupins</strong>, Inverleigh 2006<br />

Den<strong>to</strong>n, Pearce et al. in prep.


WU425 peat slurry<br />

WU425 water inject<br />

DEPARTMENT OF<br />

PRIMARY INDUSTRIES<br />

Poorly responsive sites<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

Nodule mass (mg per plant)<br />

0<br />

uninoculated<br />

ben<strong>to</strong>nite granules<br />

attapulgite granules<br />

attapulgite granules at 50 mm<br />

Freeze dried on seed<br />

Freeze dried in furrow<br />

80 units N / ha<br />

WSM4024 water inject<br />

WSM4024 peat slurry


DEPARTMENT OF<br />

PRIMARY INDUSTRIES<br />

Response <strong>of</strong> Inoculants<br />

Log<br />

nodulation<br />

(treatments)<br />

Log background nodulation<br />

(nodulation by uninoculated


DEPARTMENT OF<br />

PRIMARY INDUSTRIES<br />

Chickpea Faba bean Lentil Lupin Field pea<br />

Peat slurry<br />

Peat<br />

granules<br />

Attapulgite<br />

granules<br />

Ben<strong>to</strong>nite<br />

granules


DEPARTMENT OF<br />

PRIMARY INDUSTRIES<br />

% Plant nodulation<br />

Data from 37<br />

field trials<br />

separated by<br />

soil rhizobial<br />

population;<br />

black columns<br />

small soil<br />

populations;<br />

white columns<br />

large<br />

populations<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

% Plants nodulated<br />

Uninoculated<br />

Ben<strong>to</strong>nite 10 kg / ha<br />

Ben<strong>to</strong>nite 5 kg / ha<br />

Attapulgite 10 kg / ha<br />

Attapulgite 5 kg / ha<br />

Peat granules 10 kg / ha<br />

0<br />

Peat granules 5 kg / ha<br />

Peat slurry on seed


DEPARTMENT OF<br />

PRIMARY INDUSTRIES<br />

Results<br />

(a)<br />

White<br />

symbols –<br />

ben<strong>to</strong>nite<br />

Grey<br />

symbols –<br />

attapulgite<br />

granules<br />

Black<br />

symbols –<br />

peat<br />

granules<br />

% Plant nodulation<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

10 3 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 7 10 8 10 9 10 10<br />

Rhizobial concentration in granules (number <strong>of</strong> rhizobia g -1 granule)<br />

Den<strong>to</strong>n, Pearce, Ballard, Mutch, Norng, Hannah, Slattery,<br />

unpublished data


DEPARTMENT OF<br />

PRIMARY INDUSTRIES<br />

Results<br />

White<br />

symbols –<br />

ben<strong>to</strong>nite<br />

Grey<br />

symbols –<br />

attapulgite<br />

granules<br />

Black<br />

symbols –<br />

peat<br />

granules<br />

% Plant nodulation<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

10 3 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 7 10 8 10 9 10 10<br />

Rhizobial concentration in granules (number <strong>of</strong> rhizobia g -1 granule)<br />

(b)<br />

Den<strong>to</strong>n, Pearce, Ballard, Mutch, Norng, Hannah Slattery, unpublished<br />

data


DEPARTMENT OF<br />

PRIMARY INDUSTRIES<br />

Inoculant potential<br />

• Peat inoculant with 10 9 rhizobia applied at<br />

250g / 100 kg seed and sown at 100 kg seed<br />

/ ha = 2.5 x 10 11 rhizobia / ha<br />

• Granular inoculant with 10 7 rhizobia applied<br />

at 10 kg / ha = 1 x 10 11 rhizobia / ha


DEPARTMENT OF<br />

PRIMARY INDUSTRIES<br />

Field Response<br />

Granular<br />

inoculant<br />

Peat<br />

inoculant<br />

Nil<br />

Faba beans, Yalla-Y-Pora, 2005


DEPARTMENT OF<br />

PRIMARY INDUSTRIES Grain yield<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

Grain yield (<strong>to</strong>nnes ha -1 )<br />

Uninoculated<br />

Peat inoculant<br />

Granules B 5<br />

Granules B 10<br />

Granules B 10 Undersown<br />

Granules A 5<br />

0<br />

Granules A 10<br />

Granules A 10 Undersown<br />

Faba beans, Ararat 2005


DEPARTMENT OF<br />

PRIMARY INDUSTRIES<br />

Grain N<br />

250<br />

Grain nitrogen (kg N ha -1 )<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

0 1 2 3 4<br />

Nodule score (plant -1 )<br />

Faba beans, Ararat 2005


DEPARTMENT OF<br />

PRIMARY INDUSTRIES<br />

Conclusions<br />

• Soil inoculants provide an option for inoculation<br />

when seeds contain fungicides / pesticides<br />

• Granular inoculants provide an option for inoculation<br />

in dry soil environments<br />

• Liquid inoculants are as effective as peat slurry<br />

inoculants<br />

• Granular inoculants can be as effective as peat<br />

slurry inoculants, but require >10 7 cells g -1 inoculant


DEPARTMENT OF<br />

PRIMARY INDUSTRIES<br />

Acknowledgments<br />

•The Grains Research and Development Corporation<br />

and DPI for funding this work through <strong>the</strong> National<br />

Rhizobium Program<br />

•Bernadette Carmody and David Pearce - technical<br />

assistance<br />

•Ross Ballard, Lesley Mutch and Jo Slattery -<br />

collabora<strong>to</strong>rs<br />

•Murray Hannah and Sorn Norng - statistical assistance<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!