02.04.2015 Views

Capt. Alan Maiorano, USN

Capt. Alan Maiorano, USN

Capt. Alan Maiorano, USN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Pacific 2002<br />

“Ready When Needed Means Ready Now”<br />

World Class In-Service Engineering<br />

CAPTAIN <strong>Alan</strong> <strong>Maiorano</strong>, <strong>USN</strong><br />

Commander, Port Hueneme Division<br />

Naval Surface Warfare Center<br />

Port Hueneme CA


Our Mission<br />

Provide Test and Evaluation, In-Service Engineering, and<br />

Integrated Logistics Support for Surface Warfare Combat<br />

Systems<br />

Means<br />

Safe, Effective and Affordable Warfare Systems<br />

Page 2


Our Customers<br />

• AEGIS COMBAT SYSTEM<br />

• SHIP SELF DEFENSE<br />

SYSTEM (SSDS)<br />

• MK 92 FIRE CONTROL SYSTEM<br />

• MK 86 GUN FIRE CONTROL<br />

SYSTEM<br />

• MK 68 GUN FIRE CONTROL<br />

SYSTEM<br />

• TARGET ACQUISITION SYSTEM<br />

• RAPID ANTI-SHIP MISSILE<br />

INTEGRATED DEFENSE SYSTEM<br />

• SEARCH RADARS<br />

• INTEGRATED AUTO DETECT &<br />

TRACKING SYSTEM SYS 1 & 2<br />

• COOPERATIVE ENGAGEMENT<br />

CAPABILITY (CEC)<br />

• BATTLE FORCE<br />

TACTICAL TRAINING (BFTT)<br />

• BATTLE FORCE<br />

INTEROPERABILITY<br />

• THEATER BALLISTIC<br />

MISSILE DEFENSE (TBMD)<br />

• MK 34 GUN WEAPON SYSTEM<br />

108 Surface Combatants<br />

12 Aircraft Carriers<br />

40 Amphibious Ships<br />

34 Replenishment Ships<br />

Battle Groups<br />

Allied Forces<br />

• STANDARD MISSILE<br />

• NATO SEASPARROW<br />

MISSILE SYSTEM<br />

• EVOLVED NATO SEASPARROW<br />

MISSILE (ESSM)<br />

• ROLLING AIRFRAME<br />

MISSILE SYSTEM<br />

• VERTICAL LAUNCH ASROC<br />

• TOMAHAWK<br />

• HARPOON<br />

• GUN WEAPON SYSTEMS<br />

MK 38, MK 42, MK 45 & MK75<br />

• CLOSE IN WEAPON SYSTEM<br />

MK 15<br />

• VERTICAL LAUNCHING SYSTEM<br />

• GUIDED MISSILE LAUNCHING<br />

SYSTEMS MK 10, MK 13, MK 22<br />

MK26, MK 29 & MK48<br />

• UNDERWAY REPLENISHMENT<br />

• AREA AIR DEFENSE<br />

COMMANDER (AADC)<br />

• NAVAL FIRES<br />

NETWORK (NFN)<br />

Page 3


Organizational Relationship<br />

Today’s Fleet<br />

Commander<br />

NAVSEA<br />

Tomorrow’s Fleet<br />

Commander<br />

NSWC<br />

SHIPS AND<br />

SHIP SYSTEMS<br />

SURFACE SHIP COMBAT SYSTEMS<br />

ORDNANCE<br />

ASSESSMENT<br />

Port<br />

Hueneme<br />

Division<br />

Carderock Division Dahlgren Division<br />

Crane Division Indian Head Division<br />

Corona Division<br />

Page 4


Capabilities<br />

Surface Warfare<br />

Engineering Facility<br />

Underway Replenishment<br />

Self Defense Test Ship<br />

Combat Systems Integration<br />

Gun Weapon Systems<br />

Missile Flight Testing<br />

Search Radar Systems<br />

Page 5


An Insight Into Future Requirements<br />

• “…Tailored Forces Forward Stationed and Deployed …”<br />

• “…Defeating Attacks With Only Modest Reinforcements…”<br />

• This Translates Into Increased Readiness:<br />

• Capability … Force Multipliers<br />

• Availability … Increased Operational Readiness<br />

• Sustainability … Remote Assistance, Reduced Manpower<br />

• Supportability … Improved Logistics<br />

Page 6


Capability<br />

• Interoperability Testing<br />

• Realistic Test Environment<br />

• Instrumented Test Range / Live Firing<br />

• Capabilities and Limitations<br />

Benefits<br />

• Increased Battle Force, Ship System<br />

Capabilities<br />

• System Performance Validation<br />

• System Integration<br />

Future<br />

• Joint Distributed Engineering Plant<br />

• Multi-Ship Testing<br />

Page 7


Availability …<br />

Increased Operational Readiness<br />

• Detailed Element / System / Ship /<br />

Battle Force Analysis<br />

• Operational Data and Trends<br />

• Engineering Rigor<br />

• Focused Capability Reviews<br />

Benefits<br />

• ID Trends … Develop Fix<br />

• Prepare Tactics / Procedures<br />

• Influence Fleet Investment Decisions<br />

• Improve Effectiveness<br />

Future<br />

• Total Ship Assessments<br />

• Expand to Warfare Areas<br />

• Lower Total Cost of Ownership<br />

Page 8


Sustainability …<br />

Remote Assistance / Reduced Manning<br />

• Web Site and Email<br />

• Single Point, Engineering<br />

Connectivity From Fleet, to Shore<br />

Infrastructure<br />

• Near Real-Time Problem<br />

Solving 24/7<br />

Benefits<br />

• Reduces Maintenance / Ownership<br />

Costs<br />

• Shared Data Environment<br />

• Increases Ship Self Sufficiency<br />

Future<br />

• Remote Built-in Test / Training<br />

• Self Diagnosis<br />

• Real Time Remote Monitoring<br />

• Faster Response to Fleet Issues<br />

Page 9


Supportability …<br />

Logistics Improvements<br />

• Commercial Off the Shelf Technology<br />

• Refresh Rates<br />

• Sparing<br />

Challenge<br />

• Documentation<br />

What We’re Doing<br />

• Direct Vendor Delivery<br />

• Performance Based Logistics<br />

• Diminishing Manufacturing Resource<br />

Analysis<br />

• COTS Working Group<br />

Projected Number of Upgrades Based<br />

on Digital Component Lifecycles<br />

Comparison of Military versus Commercial<br />

In<br />

1998<br />

30 Year Aircraft Lifecycle<br />

1<br />

In<br />

15 Years 15 Years<br />

1986 One modernization upgrade over 30 years<br />

1 2<br />

In<br />

12 Years 12 Years<br />

1998 Two modernization upgrades over 30 years<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7<br />

3½ Year Increments<br />

Seven modernization upgrades over 30 years<br />

<br />

Goals<br />

• Minimize Government R&D Costs<br />

• Predict Logistic Problem Areas<br />

• Minimize Government Inventory<br />

• Improve Delivery Delays<br />

Military<br />

Devices<br />

Commercial<br />

Devices<br />

Page 10


Common Environment …<br />

Common Challenges…<br />

Faster<br />

Better<br />

Affordable<br />

READY WHEN NEEDED !<br />

Page 11


Common Environment …<br />

Common Challenges…<br />

Faster<br />

Better<br />

Affordable<br />

READY WHEN NEEDED !<br />

Page 12


Maintainability …<br />

Reduced Manpower / Less Upkeep<br />

• Monitoring & Reporting of an<br />

Encanistered Missile’s Condition,<br />

Location, Health & Environmental<br />

Exposure:<br />

• Near Real-Time and Historical<br />

Knowledge<br />

• Automatically Collects & Transmits<br />

Shipboard & Land Data (2-Way)<br />

• Non-Intrusive<br />

Benefits<br />

• Monitors Actual Condition<br />

• Drives Re-Certification / Re-Test<br />

Candidates<br />

• Identifies “Accident Victims”<br />

• Mitigates Costs of Accidents, Failures,<br />

Wet-Downs<br />

PC/Windows-Based Local Network<br />

Memory<br />

Module<br />

Boundary Scan<br />

Standard Interface<br />

IR or RF<br />

Module<br />

Future<br />

• Extend Missile Service Life<br />

• Less Maintenance<br />

Condition And Environment<br />

Sensing And Reporting System<br />

(CAESAR)<br />

Low-Power Sensors/RF<br />

or IR Tags<br />

• Condition-Based Maintenance / Repair<br />

• Eliminate Maintenance Due Dates<br />

Future BIT/BITE<br />

Missile Integration<br />

Temperature Gradient monitoring capability across the canister.<br />

Page 14


Maintainability …<br />

Reduced Manpower, Less Upkeep<br />

• End to End Combat System Testing<br />

• Validation of System Performance<br />

and Element Maintenance<br />

Procedures<br />

• Live Firing and A/C Tracking for Ship<br />

Force<br />

Benefits<br />

• Validates System Op and Crew<br />

Proficiency in Tactically, Realistic<br />

Engagements<br />

• On Site Training Provided by System<br />

Experts<br />

• Ensures Logistics in Place and<br />

Properly Supported (Documentation /<br />

PMS / etc.)<br />

Future<br />

• Multiple Ship CSSQTs for<br />

Interoperability Validation<br />

• Inclusion of Cooperative Engagement<br />

Capabilities in the CSSQT Process<br />

• Increasingly Complex Scenarios<br />

Page 15


Affordability …<br />

Reduced Total Ownership Costs<br />

• Representative Remotely Operated<br />

Combat System Platform<br />

• Conduct Tactically Realistic Target<br />

Presentations With Minimal Risk to<br />

Ship and Personnel<br />

• Test and Evaluation Asset<br />

Benefits<br />

• Test New Technologies, Sensors,<br />

Tactics in an At-Sea Environment<br />

• Validate Ship Self Defense<br />

Capabilities (RAM / ESSM / CIWS /<br />

Blk 1B)<br />

• Minimize Technical Risk<br />

• Reduce Costs<br />

Future<br />

• Future SDTS To Increase Testing<br />

Capabilities, Service Life and<br />

Testing Capacity (Space, Weight,<br />

Moment, Power)<br />

Page 16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!