Five Challenges for Future Infantry: Thinking about ... - Australian Army
Five Challenges for Future Infantry: Thinking about ... - Australian Army
Five Challenges for Future Infantry: Thinking about ... - Australian Army
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Five</strong> <strong>Challenges</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Future</strong> <strong>Infantry</strong><br />
<strong>Future</strong> <strong>Infantry</strong> Challenge 2: Operating across the<br />
<strong>Five</strong>s Lines of Operation<br />
Adaptive Campaigning – <strong>Future</strong> Land Operating Concept, released by the Chief<br />
of <strong>Army</strong> on 16 September 2009, is centred on the <strong>for</strong>mation of the Land Force<br />
components of which might include, as well as ADF services, government and nongovernment<br />
agencies and <strong>Australian</strong> Civilian Corps. 2 The document<br />
…defines the actions taken by the Land Force as part of the military contribution to a<br />
Joint and Whole of Government approach to resolving conflicts and advancing Australia’s<br />
national interests. 3<br />
Fundamental to Adaptive Campaigning are five interdependent and mutually<br />
rein<strong>for</strong>cing lines of operation: Joint Land Combat, Population Protection,<br />
In<strong>for</strong>mation Actions, Population Support, and Indigenous Capacity Building.<br />
In accordance with <strong>Infantry</strong>’s role, Joint Land Combat is the primary responsibility<br />
of <strong>Future</strong> <strong>Infantry</strong>. For the last decade, in Australia, our region and beyond,<br />
the <strong>Infantry</strong> have also employed Population Protection to protect people from<br />
immediate danger, and Population Support to establish an environment that allows<br />
people to carry out their normal lives with family, work and education.<br />
For the last decade and throughout the <strong>Infantry</strong>’s history, the <strong>Infantry</strong> have relied<br />
upon smart, empowered soldiers and leaders, supported by robust training and<br />
professional mastery, to support the Land Force’s In<strong>for</strong>mation Actions, often while<br />
in contact with adaptive, agile and lethal<br />
enemies. Well orchestrated In<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
Actions ensure that the Land Force’s<br />
message, or dominant narrative, is effectively<br />
portrayed and understood by all<br />
people within Land Force’s battlespace.<br />
Experienced <strong>Infantry</strong> personnel know<br />
that the Land Force’s message must be<br />
honest and consistent. While the Land<br />
Force can tailor messages <strong>for</strong> different<br />
people and different audiences, <strong>Future</strong><br />
<strong>Future</strong> <strong>Infantry</strong>’s need to adapt<br />
and change will be conducted<br />
in direct competition with<br />
equally adaptive, agile and<br />
lethal enemies.<br />
<strong>Infantry</strong> must understand that it is difficult to send any messages that will be<br />
understood in the same way by the many audiences that may hear it. 4 For example,<br />
the message <strong>for</strong> the enemy differs from the message <strong>for</strong> coalition partners, and may<br />
be different again <strong>for</strong> the people who actually live in <strong>Future</strong> <strong>Infantry</strong>’s battlespace.<br />
Unless these messages are honest and consistent, the Land Force risks causing effects<br />
in the in<strong>for</strong>mation environment that impede the conduct of friendly operations, or<br />
adversely affect friendly <strong>for</strong>ces; this is colourfully dubbed ‘in<strong>for</strong>mation fratricide’<br />
<strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Army</strong> Journal • Volume VII, Number 1 • page 35