Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) - City of Delaware

City of 

Delaware 

Ohio 

August 28, 2008 

Dear Mayor Wheeler and Council Members: 

In accordance with Section 79 of the City Charter, submitted herewith is the 2009-2013 

Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Pursuant to Section 80 of the Charter, Council is 

required to adopt a CIP on or before October 15. 

In review of the 2009-2013 CIP city staff made efforts to consider our capital needs, what 

the community wants, the age and condition of our infrastructure, the status of current 

projects, and how we could add the necessary new infrastructure and equipment in the 

most cost effective manner. 

You will see our estimates for the City’s general fund allocation to the CIP is fairly 

conservative with increases averaging 1.8% over the 5 year period. Technology and 

equipment purchases consume the majority of this revenue followed by transportation 

and street maintenance. Debt service paid by the general fund for the streetscape 

improvements, Ross Street Park, and pool improvements consumes an average of 35% of 

general fund income right off the top. The remaining amount of $6.1 million is what is 

left to spend on capital improvements. 

We have scaled back significantly in the transportation and street maintenance areas in 

order to preserve and target street maintenance dollars to the “The Point” project. 

Realignment and signalization of the intersection is planned for 2009. This project is 

being partially funded by the Ohio Public Works Commission and will address the City’s 

Point related congestion. 

You may recall the state of Ohio passed an “economic stimulus” bill in late spring of this 

year in an effort to spur economic development, growth, and generate jobs throughout the 

state. One of their targets was increasing funding for several Ohio Public Works 

Commission programs. The city has successfully completed several OPWC projects in 

the past and was eager to take advantage of this opportunity. Of course, these grants 

require a City commitment of funds as a match. The total project cost for all proposed 

OPWC projects is $3,437,600 with the City’s share being $1,754,447. We have also been 

fortunate in the past to receive a $50,000 contribution from the County for each of these 

projects. We anticipate that commitment to continue. You will see the “Point Phase 1” 

project in the Street Maintenance category and the other OPWC projects in the 

Transportation Improvement category. 

The downside to focusing resources on “The Point” in 2009 is a reduction in the City’s 

resurfacing dollars. Since the City’s contribution to the Point is $506,744 this added cost 

1 South Sandusky Street • City Hall Delaware, OH 43015 p: 740-203-1200 f: 740-203-1224 

1



Ohio 

could not be directly absorbed. Therefore, we had to review our options. During our CIP 

discussions we reviewed our resurfacing program and the overall condition of our roads. 

As you may be aware, the industry standard for gauging the overall condition of 

roadways is the pavement condition index, or PCI. We have included some additional 

narrative on the city’s PCI. Overall, the City’s road conditions are considered “good” 

(68-81 PCI) based on this index. Our goal has been to maintain at least at 70 PCI average 

on all our roads. Therefore, city staff felt that by reducing some of the resurfacing dollars 

in 2009 we could shift this resource to the Point without overly impacting the quality of 

our roadways. This will result in a resurfacing program of $226,718 in 2009. In 2010 this 

amount will be increased to $798,000 and increase to $850,000 by 2013. 

Another important topic in the CIP is the City’s overall debt position. Currently our total 

outstanding debt is $76 million. We have included a complete summary of the City’s debt 

position in the introductory material that outlines our outstanding debt, our annual 

payments, and maturity dates. By using debt-financing we have been able to add 

substantial infrastructure to the City such as a new wastewater treatment facility, the 

Southeast Highland Sewer, sections of Glenn Road, and a new Public Works facility and 

Justice Center Expansion. These investments were necessary given the City’s expansion 

and growth over the years. When development increases we will recoup our investment 

from the South East Highland Sewer and Glenn Road through capacity fee income and 

community charges, respectively. 

Some of the new capital investments in the CIP that will be financed over the long-term 

include the water treatment plant expansion, Hills-Miller transmission line, and the 

upground reservoir. These are all out of the Water Capacity Fund. The debt for these 

projects will be paid from Water Capacity Funds and increases in water rates, given the 

current income stream from capacity fees. You will see that projects in the Sewer 

Capacity Fund are very limited and are programmed largely in 2009. 

One of the major equipment purchases in the plan is a $1.25 million ladder truck for the 

City’s fire department. The current truck was purchased in 1981 and has reached its 

useful life. Many of the parts for the vehicle are no longer made and/or difficult to find. 

The Public Works Department has had to fabricate several parts on the truck in order to 

keep it running. This truck cannot be purchased with impact fee funds since it is a 

replacement vehicle; therefore the city will purchase it with General Fund money. Our 

plan is to lease the truck and make annual interest payments over a 15-year period. 

Some of the other important topics of discussion we will have over the next few weeks is 

the disposition of revenue from the recent recreation levy, our plan for adding more fire 

stations, and issues associated with inflow and infiltration. You will see in the Fire 

Impact Fee fund the plan shows construction of station #3 and #4 and the annual debt 

service requirements to construct these facilities. During our review we will focus on our 


2



Ohio 

current need for these stations and our strategic approach. Also, we will discuss the 

amount of recreation levy dollars that will be available from the levy and the timing and 

possible projects that may be funded by this source of revenue. As we discuss public 

utilities projects we will focus on our current problems with storm water infiltrating our 

sewer system and impacting our wastewater operation and how we are addressing this 

issue. 

As you review the CIP you will see that the format of the 2009-2013 CIP is somewhat 

different compared to past years. City staff felt the need to include additional information 

in this year’s plan to serve as reference material as City Council reviews and understands 

the issues surrounding this year’s plan. We have included three new sections that we may 

have only briefly touched on in the past. These new sections include: Glenn Road; tax 

increment financing improvements; and the Project Trust Fund. Given the City’s 

considerable infrastructure investment in Glenn Road we felt the appropriate forum to 

discuss the status of the parkway was CIP review. During our subsequent CIP meetings 

we will discuss the details of what the City has spent on Glenn Road, the current 

financing mechanisms in place, and our future strategic and financial plan moving 

forward. Given the current state of the economy and its effect on the residential housing 

market the City is taking a cautious and focused spending approach to the Glenn Road 

project until future development commitments are made and identifiable sources of 

revenue are apparent. City staff will also be discussing projects that are financially 

supported by a portion of developer contributions deposited into the Project Trust Fund 

and the operation of this fund. We also want to discuss the city’s involvement with tax 

increment financing, what it is, how it works, and what projects are associated with it. 

In summary the 2009-2013 CIP is an attempt to balance the very important needs of a 

growing community with its limited resources. Over the course of the next several weeks, 

city staff and I look forward to reviewing this important proposal with Council. 

Yours Sincerely, 

R. Thomas Homan 

City Manager 


3

12 4

2009-2013 

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN 

CITY OF DELAWARE, OHIO 

CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS 

Windell Wheeler, Mayor 

Carolyn Riggle, Vice-Mayor 

Andrew Brush 

Joe Di Genova 

Lisa Keller 

Gary Milner 

Jim Moore 

STAFF 

City Manager, R. Thomas Homan 

Assistant City Manager, Allen Rothermel 

Finance Director, Dean Stelzer 

5

22 6

Executive Summary 

Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) 

City of Delaware 

2009-2013 

PART I. OVERVIEW 

Each annual CIP that is adopted covers a five-year period. In 2008, the City prepared the 

2009-2013 CIP. The CIP includes a listing of all the projects, equipment, land purchases, 

and vehicles that departments plan to purchase or construct in each of the five years. The 

plan also includes detail on available revenue sources to fund the capital expenditures, as 

well as explanations on debt levels and debt service commitments. The 2009-2013 CIP 

also includes reference to previously approved projects that are carried forward and their 

completion schedules. 

The City is making strategic efforts with the 2009-2013 CIP to establish clear linkages to 

all other business plans, budgets, policies, and day-to-day operations and to develop and 

implement a strategic approach to capital planning. 

Purpose 

The CIP is a planning document that presents a five-year overview of the scheduled 

capital projects and equipment needs of the City. The purpose of capital improvement 

planning is to review, prioritize and form the link between proposed needs, limited 

financial resources, and the guidance in the City’s Comprehensive plan, adopted master 

plans, and insight from City Council and the community. A properly prepared capital 

plan is essential to the future financial health of the City and continued delivery of 

services to citizens and businesses. 

Capital planning also positions the City to react strategically to changing dynamics such 

as the economy, new development opportunities, changes in the city’s financial 

condition, and unforeseen emergency infrastructure problems. The city’s strategic 

reaction involves adjusting project costs, project timelines, and possibly adding additional 

projects if necessary. 

Definition of a Capital Improvement 

A capital improvement is a major fiscal expenditure associated with maintaining the 

city’s infrastructure. In many cases, these expenditures are project related and typically 

are non-recurring. However, in some cases the City does dedicate financial resources on a 

recurring basis for capital projects such as road resurfacing, IT equipment; 

police/fire/public works vehicles; and sidewalk repairs. 

7

A capital expenditure differs from operating budget expenditures. Operating expenditures 

include personnel expenses, materials and supplies, and small equipment that involve day 

to day operations of the City. 

Examples of capital improvements include: 

- Acquisition of land; 

- Construction or expansion of public facilities, streets, or utility lines; 

- Non-recurring rehabilitation of a facility; 

- Design work or planning study related to an individual project; 

- An item that typically has a useful life of 5 or more years; and 

- Replacement and purchase of vehicles 

Financial Policies and Guidelines 

The city adopted several financial policies and guidelines that serve as a foundation for 

capital improvement planning. These policies cover all capital categories in the CIP. The 

financial policies related to CIP planning include the following: 

The budget will provide for adequate maintenance and repair of capital assets for 

their orderly replacement; 

The city will develop a five-year capital improvements program on an annual 

basis; 

The city will enact an annual capital improvement budget based on the multi-year 

capital improvements program; 

The city will coordinate development of the capital improvement budget with 

development of the operating budget; 

The city will confine long-term borrowing to capital improvement projects; 

When the city finances capital projects by issuing debt, it will repay the debt 

within a period not to exceed the expected useful life of the project; 

The city will evaluate issuing debt and pay-as-you-go financing to maintain 

flexibility for the future; 

The city will continually seek to maintain and improve its current bond rating to 

minimize borrowing costs and to ensure that access to credit is preserved. 

Capital Improvement Planning Process 

The City of Delaware’s process of preparing the annual CIP involves the following 

departments: Finance, Engineering, Public Works, Public Utilities, Police, Fire, Parks and 

8

Recreation, and Information Technology. Prior to the start of the annual CIP planning 

process the Finance Department reviews the city’s financial condition and evaluates the 

status of projects in the present CIP plan. Concurrently, departments are requested to 

submit individual project sheets that cover the project’s description and purpose, provide 

justification for the project, and detail project cost estimates. 

When developing projects departments do the following: 1) assess the needs for new 

facilities or upgrades of existing facilities and infrastructure; 2) review current 

regulations and compliance; 3) translate needs into prioritized project proposals and 

develop cost estimates; 4) review existing master plans; and 5) develop financing 

strategies. 

As departments develop their annual CIP submission they are asked to provide a 

summary of their project requests and their strategic approach. This involves 

summarizing how their projects achieve and align with the long-term goals of the 

community, the recommendations of adopted master plans, and how their strategies 

address their short-term initiatives that result from operating in a dynamic environment. 

9

34 10

PART II. FINANCIAL SUMMARY 

Revenues 

Projects in the CIP are funded from a variety of sources including general fund income 

tax revenues, gas tax revenues, grants, utility fees as well as other revenue sources. The 

CIP’s general fund allocation was approximately $1.63 million in 2008. In 2009 the 

allocation is $1.7 million, 4.2% higher. 

Chart 1. 

General Fund Income Tax Transfer to the CIP 

$2,000,000 

$1,800,000 

$1,600,000 

$1,400,000 

$1,200,000 

$1,000,000 

$800,000 

$600,000 

$400,000 

$200,000 

$0 

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 

est. est. est. est. 

Over the 5 year period from 2009-2013, the total planned general fund allocation is $6.07 

million. In 2009, as with all years in the CIP, the majority of city income tax supports 

equipment replacement and technology improvements. Equipment replacement includes 

vehicles for the Police, Fire, Parks and Recreation, Airport, and Public Works 

departments. This can be seen in both Charts 2 and 3 below. Technology improvements 

largely include annual computer and copier replacements, network improvements and 

dollars allocated for fiber infrastructure. 

Chart 2. 

2009 General Fund Allocation to the CIP 

Technology 

Improvements 

20% 

Building 

Maintenance 

6% 

Airport 


6% 

Street Maintenance 

16% 

Equipment 

Replacement 

31% 

Park Improvements 

0% 

Transportation 


21% 

11

Chart 3. 

Total General Fund Allocation to the CIP 2009-2013 

900,000 

800,000 

700,000 

600,000 

500,000 

400,000 

300,000 

2009 

2010 

2011 

2012 

2013 

200,000 

100,000 

0 

Airport 


Street 

M aintenance 



Park 


Equipment 

Replacement 

Technology 


Building 

M aintenance 

Expenditures 

Chart 4 below shows CIP expenditures by fund for all projects across all funds, including 

the general fund. Note in this table total project expenditures do not include debt service 

payments in order for the reader to see what costs are actually spent on projects and 

equipment. Chart 4 also shows that water fund capacity projects comprise a large 

majority of the project dollars in the five-year plan. This is due to the planned expansion 

of the water treatment plant. Also across the five-year period notable expenditures are in 

the transportation improvement category. This is due primarily for planned expenditures 

for the Veteran’s Parkway road project – design which started in 2008. 

Chart 4. 

2009-2013 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN SUMMARY 

*Excludes Debt Service in total Expenditures 

FUND 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 

Airport Improvement Fund 1,155,745 240,745 460,745 1,195,745 1,415,745 

Street Maintenance and Repair Fund 1,514,118 1,183,600 1,208,529 1,235,000 1,235,000 

Transportation Improvements 1,043,700 3,722,000 100,000 6,250,000 44,561,000 

Park Improvement Fund 315,000 52,200 29,000 32,500 25,000 

Equipment Replacement Fund 206,200 815,500 813,500 586,000 896,500 

Technology Improvements 177,000 347,000 262,000 287,000 212,000 

Building Maintenance 51,100 106,300 54,500 25,200 0 

Park Impact Fee Improvement Fund 5,000 20,000 0 0 0 

Police Impact Fee Improvement Fund 0 65,000 0 0 0 

Fire Impact Fee Improvement Fund 100,000 208,750 0 0 0 

Municipal Services Impact Fee Fund 0 0 0 0 0 

Water Fund Maintenance Projects 8,375,000 11,300,000 2,200,000 200,000 200,000 

Water Fund Capacity Projects 1,355,000 680,000 10,915,000 175,000 785,000 

Sewer Fund Maintenance Projects 365,000 625,000 150,000 605,000 690,000 

Sewer Fund Capacity Projects 890,000 150,000 3,000,000 0 0 

12

Refuse Fund 457,476 428,876 470,276 466,276 436,276 

Storm Sewer Fund 360,000 460,000 770,000 540,000 460,000 

TOTAL PROJECT 

EXPENDITURES 16,370,339 $20,404,971 $20,433,550 $11,597,721 $50,916,521 

Chart 5 below shows what percentage of the CIP in 2009 goes for street maintenance and 

transportation improvements. The majority of funding for street maintenance comes from 

license taxes and motor fuel taxes. The monies are used for general maintenance on the 

City’s roads as well as the sidewalk repair program. A large portion of funding for 

transportation improvements also comes from Ohio Department of Transportation 

(ODOT) funds, Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission (MORPC) allocations, and 

federal earmarks. 

Chart 5. 

2009 CIP Funding for Street Maintenance & Transportation 


Street Improvements 

35% 

Street Resurfacing 

Program 

Issue II 

11% 


15% 

Other Improvements 

10% 

MORPC 


Planning 

29% 

Chart 6 below shows the City’s planned allocation of resurfacing dollars over the 5-year 

period. In 2009 the allocation is considerably less that the out-years in order to target 

more street maintenance dollars to the Point – Phase 1 project. 

Chart 6. 

Resurfacing Dollars 2009-2010 

900,000 

800,000 

700,000 

600,000 

500,000 

400,000 

300,000 

200,000 

100,000 

0 

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 

Resurfacing Dollars 

13

Chart 7 shows transportation and street maintenance funds from 2009 to 2013. The chart 

shows MORPC funding increasing from 2009 to 2013 due to the Veteran’s Parkway 

project. Issue II projects that the City will be undertaking in 2009 include the Point Phase 

1 and the US-36 & Houk turn lane improvement project. 

Chart 7. 

Transportation and Street Funding 

2009-2013 

*Does not include funding for Veteran's Parkway Construction 

3,500,000 

3,000,000 

2,500,000 

2,000,000 

1,500,000 

1,000,000 

500,000 

- 

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 

Street Resurfacing Program 

Issue II Improvements 

M ORPC Transportation Planning 

Other Improvements 

Street Improvements 

The Police and Fire Impact Fee Funds are supported by impact fees charged per 

development unit. These fees provide funding for vehicles, special equipment, and debt 

service on capital construction projects. The CIP shows from 2011-2013 dollars being 

allocated for debt service for the construction of additional fire station #3 and #4. No 

decision on future construction or location of these fire stations has been made. As seen 

in Chart 8 below, police impact fee expenditures over the years are estimated to be fairly 

steady. This is due to approximately $88,000 in funds being allocated to pay the debt 

service on the Justice Center renovation. 

Chart 8. 

2009-2013 Funding 

Police Impact Fee Fund & Fire Impact Fee Fund 

350,000 

300,000 

250,000 

200,000 

150,000 

100,000 

50,000 

0 

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 

Fire 

Police 

Over the 2009-2013 period, the revenue in the Water Capacity Fund will begin service 

primarily debt obligations from projects such as the water treatment plant expansion, 

14

Kingman hill water tower, and the Westside transmission line. Though these are 

important projects looking in the future there is very little funding for projects unless 

development picks up and the city sees and increase in capacity fee revenue. This can be 

seen in Chart 9 below. Three large projects programmed out of this fund, mainly in 2009 

and 2010, are the Penry Road waterline projects, west side transmission line project, and 

the water treatment plant expansion. The case is the same for the Sewer Capacity Fund 

where the majority of revenues coming into the fund are going to service debt rather than 

projects. Very few projects are programmed in this fund over the 2009-2013 period given 

this dynamic. 

Chart 9. 

Water Fund Capacity Revenues and Expenditure 2009-2013 

14,000,000 

12,000,000 

10,000,000 

8,000,000 

6,000,000 

4,000,000 

2,000,000 

0 

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 

Revenues 9,205,000 12,187,500 3,562,500 1,757,500 1,772,500 

Expenditures -Debt 239,405 240,805 1,731,791 1,732,791 1,732,791 

Expenditures -Projects 8,375,000 11,300,000 2,200,000 200,000 200,000 

Revenues Expenditures -Debt Expenditures -Projects 

15

PART III. GUIDING STRATEGIES 

Streets and Transportation 

Resurface city streets using a 70/30 split approach - 70% is applied to mill and fill 

and overlays and 30% is applied toward crack seal, slurry seal, and rejuvenator 

coatings. 

Maintain all arterial roadways, collectors, and local roadways at 70 PCI 

(Pavement Condition Index) or above. 

Upgrade all public sidewalks intersecting with roads scheduled to be resurfaced to 

current American Disabilities Act (ADA) standards which require access for the 

physically impaired. 

Use the Thoroughfare Plan and the City’s Comprehensive Plan as a guiding vision 

and source of several street and transportation projects. 

Pursue additional funding both locally and through the state and federal 

government. 

Assess the current street infrastructure by monitoring the pavement condition 

index (PCI) as a baseline, conducting windshield surveys, and monitoring where 

ongoing road maintenance efforts and condition changes. 

Maintain and improve upon the city current “good” PCI rating of (68-81). 

Implement the use of intermediate pavement maintenance operations such as 

slurry seals and asphalt rejuvenator applications to extend the estimated life 

expectancy of the pavement surface. 

Monitor input from citizen surveys related to road infrastructure and work to 

alleviate traffic congestion and maintain streets. 

Limit the use of MORPC funds to fund major federal and state route highway 

projects. 

Municipal Airport 

Promote the economic benefit of aviation to the community and strive for self 

sustaining operations. 

Work to increase the number of based aviation businesses and corporate general 

aviation aircrafts utilizing the airfield. 

Use the city’s $150,000 annual entitlement funds from the FAA and roll any 

unused balances into future years for up to 3 years. 

Continue seeking FAA State of Ohio apportionment funds (via ODOT) for 

general aviation projects. 

Consider future applications to ODOT’s $2 million state aviation grant program. 

Continue administering an airport TIF fund that accounts for the tax increment 

financing real estate payments the city receives from property taxes paid in the 

corporate hanger and the private T-hangers constructed at the airport. 

17

Implement the recommendations of the Airport Master Plan which include high 

priority projects such as expanding the existing apron, constructing T-hangers, 

and acquiring land for airport development. 

Focus on establishing protection areas to insure continued use of the airfield in the 

future. 

Seek funding for additional security fencing to protect both public and private 

investments as well as reduce wildlife runway incursions. 

Continue working on development of a drainage master plan that will be required 

by existing storm water regulations to support any additional expansions at the 

airport. 

Building Maintenance 

Continue heat pump replacements at the Justice Center based on industry standard 

life cycles. 

Reduce facility energy consumption. 

Continue to consider centralizing all building maintenance functions so as to 

minimize operation resources and establish consistent practices throughout 

facility infrastructure. 

Equipment Replacement 

Maintain and disposal of the majority of city vehicles, trailers and motorized 

equipment. 

Ensure all department vehicles and motorized equipment are operational and safe 

so that they provide routine and emergency services to citizens. 

Administer a preventive maintenance program and provide specification services 

for new equipment. 

Operate a rotary fund and bill city departments for vehicle services rendered; 

parts, fuel and materials supplied; and overhead. 

Maintain a vehicle replacement schedule that details the original purchase date, 

replacement year schedule, and estimated replacement year cost. 

Continued consideration of a comprehensive review of the entire fleet inventory 

to determine if departmental fleet sizes are greater than required to provide 

current services. 

Continued consideration of standardizing fleet purchases to assist in reducing 

organization fuel consumption, parts inventory, and mechanic training demands. 

Parks and Recreation 

Focus on construction of Glen Ross Park. 

Focus on neighborhood park improvements. 

Target general fund dollars for parking lot resurfacing in Mingo, Eastside, and 

Smith Park. 

18

Use the majority of park exaction dollars in the early years of the CIP plan given 

the potential for declining exaction fees considering the current development 

climate. 

Impact Fee Projects 

Collect and spend impact fees in accordance with the City’s ordinance and be 

aware of remaining collections that are close to the 5-year rebate provision. 

Make required debt service payments in each fund and be aware that without 

increasing development levels General Fund dollars may eventually be needed to 

cover these payments. 

Public Utilities 

Consider project finance options from Ohio Public Works Commission (OPWC) 

and the Ohio Water Development Authority (OWDA). 

Prioritize water and sewer mains rehabilitation and replacement projects through 

the CMMS CityWorks software. 

Improve fire flow protection by installing 8” minimum water mains in new 

developments and replacing existing lines of less than 8” when water mains are in 

need of replacement or upgrades. 

Continue small main replacements to improve water quality issues and dead end 

water mains by looping water mains in areas that have been determined to have 

water quality issues. 

Flush dead end water mains to ensure water quality. 

Prioritize projects based on those identified in the 2000 Collection System Master 

Plan, 1986 Water System Master Plan Study, the 2006 Water Master Plan, the 

1998 Storm Sewer Task Force Report/Recommendations, from CCTV data, and 

from flooding/basement backup complaints. 

Complete the 5 remaining fire flow improvement projects identified in the 1986 

Water Master Plan. 

Meet the sanitary sewer needs for future development. 

Provide extension of water and sewer mains to the City’s southwest corridor to 

help facilitate commercial and industrial development. 

Take a proactive approach to identifying future water supply and resources 

Meet USEPA Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule compliance 

by October 1, 2013 by upgrading the water treatment plant rehabilitation and 

using membrane plant technology. 

Consider the cost associated with the construction of new sewer lines and related 

facilities, such as lift stations and force mains – and how much of this cost will be 

borne by developers. 

Consider the extension of new public sewers to new development areas and the 

City’s ability to provide required city services to the new areas. 

Comply with the OEPA MS4 Permit. 

19

Minimize leachate from the closed landfill that enters the storm water pipe 

through the pipe joints in order to minimize notice of violations from the EPA. 

Information Technology 

Provide system support for all City Departments by determining IT needs, 

capabilities, and feasibility. 

Coordinate the purchasing, installation, upgrading and monitoring of all 

information technology software and hardware. 

Maintain an IT rotary fund where each department contributes a determined 

amount based on their IT usage and demands. 

Maintain a 5-year server replacement schedule and 7-year network equipment 

replacement schedule. 

Produce bigger servers, but divide the use of the servers into virtual servers, 

capable of providing more capacity in fewer machines. 

Maintain a data back plan to keep personal information private, have the 

capability to recover deleted files, and recover files in the event of a disaster. 

Maintain a 4-year PC replacement schedule in order to keep productivity as high 

as possible from a technology point of view. 

Purchase a combination of PCs and Servers/thin client computers within the PC 

replacement line item. 

Build a city-wide fiber infrastructure for use by the City and as an economic 

development tool 

Continue the plan of purchasing and maintaining technology copiers. 

20

CITY OF DELAWARE 


GENERAL FUND SUMMARY 

2009 - 2013 

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 

BALANCE FORWARD 50,000 320,202 151,667 9,003 10,196 

REVENUES: 

INCOME TAX 1,700,000 1,737,500 1,770,000 1,815,000 1,800,000 

BALANCE PLUS REVENUE 1,750,000 2,057,702 1,921,667 1,824,003 1,810,196 

EXPENDITURES: 

DEBT SERVICE 

Bonds 

2002 Issue ($5,655,000) 422,428 424,528 425,778 426,287 426,287 

2006 Ross St. ($475,000) 61,237 59,438 57,637 60,838 60,838 

2006 Pool Maint. ($550,000 10yrs.) 68,276 68,129 67,909 67,621 67,621 

TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 551,941 552,095 551,324 554,746 554,746 

AMOUNT AVAILABLE FOR CAPITAL 

IMPROVEMENTS AFTER DEBT 1,198,059 1,505,607 1,370,343 1,269,257 1,255,450 

OTHER EXPENDITURES 

AIRPORT IMPROVEMENTS 56,500 10,750 66,750 58,500 69,500 

STREET MAINTENANCE 136,768 176,906 189,090 170,561 168,761 

TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS 181,489 175,784 0 0 0 

PARK IMPROVEMENTS 0 37,200 14,000 17,500 10,000 

EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 275,000 500,000 775,000 700,000 765,000 

TECHNOLOGY IMPROVEMENTS 177,000 347,000 262,000 287,000 212,000 

BUILDING MAINTENANCE 51,100 106,300 54,500 25,500 0 

TOTAL OTHER EXPENDITURES 877,857 1,353,940 1,361,340 1,259,061 1,225,261 

ENDING BALANCE 320,202 151,667 9,003 10,196 30,189 

21


AIRPORT IMPROVEMENT FUND 

2009 - 2013 

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 

BALANCE FORWARD 0 0 0 0 0 

REVENUES: 

FAA AIP Allocation 123,500 204,250 42,750 142,500 71,250 

FAA Discretionary Grant 950,000 325,500 969,000 1,249,250 

TIF Collections 25,745 25,745 25,745 25,745 25,745 

CIP - City FAA AIP Grant Match 6,500 10,750 2,250 7,500 3,750 

CIP - City FAA Discretionary Grant Match 50,000 64,500 51,000 65,750 

TOTAL REVENUES 1,155,745 240,745 460,745 1,195,745 1,415,745 

EXPENDITURES: 

City AIP-Grant 

Drainage Master Plan 80,000 

Drainage Improvements 45,000 150,000 

Avigation Survey & Easement - East 130,000 

Avigation Survey & Easement - West 135,000 

Taxiway A Rehabilitation - East End 75,000 

City Discretionary-Grant 

Airport Rd. Relocation - Sawmill Pkwy. 1,000,000 

Ramp Expansion 90,000 900,000 

Runway Rehabilitation 120,000 1,315,000 

Terminal Building Improvements 300,000 

GF Advance Payback 25,745 25,745 25,745 25,745 25,745 

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,155,745 240,745 460,745 1,195,745 1,415,745 

AIRPORT IMPR. FUND BALANCE 0 0 0 0 0 

PURPOSE: The Airport Improvement CIP identifies future improvements to the Delaware 

Municipal Airport. 

FUNDING SOURCE: Funding for these projects comes primarily from FAA grant funds. 

The FAA AIP grant represents federal aviation funding which has been allocated to general 

aviation airports. Delaware's allocation has been $150,000 per year. It is not known how far into 

the future this grant funding will be available. This City also applies for FAA discretionary grant 

funds for airport improvements. We do not currently have any discretionary grant funded projects. 

The City's general fund covers our share of the grants and other projects that do not receive grant 

funding. 

23

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 

24


2009-2013 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 

Project: Taxiway A East End Rehabilitation 

Description and Purpose: 

Improvements to the Taxiway A surface and safety area to accommodate 

increased aviation traffic. 

Department: 

Public Works – Airport 

Fund: 

Airport Improvement Fund 

Justification: 

N/A 

Recommended Funding: 

R ECO MM ENDE D FUN DIN G 

Est im a ted Expend itur es 2 00 9 2 010 20 11 20 12 20 13 T o ta ls 

Traff ic $0 

Envir on menta l $0 

Prelimin a ry En gineer ing $0 

Final En gineer ing $75,000 $75,000 

R/W Con sulta nt $0 

R/W Pur chase $0 

Ad minstra tive $0 

Co nstru ctio n $0 

Ch an ge O rd er/Co ntingen cy $0 

Co nstru ctio n En ginee ring $0 

In spection $0 

Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $75,000 

Source of F un ds 2 00 9 2 010 20 11 20 12 20 13 T o ta ls 

G ener al F un d $3,750 $3,750 

O th er C ity Fu nds $0 

M un icipal Bon ds $0 

Private F un din g $0 

FA A AI P G rant $71,250 $71,250 

$0 

Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $75,000 $75,000 

25



Project: Runway 28 Avigational Survey & Easement 


Avigational survey & easement on the property to the west (National Limestone) 

of the runway. This will prevent future construction from entering into flight 

path that would have adverse effects on the airport. 

Department: 


Fund: 



N/A 


R ECO M M ENDE D FUN DIN G 

Est im a te d Expe nd it ur es 2 00 9 2 010 20 11 20 12 20 13 T o ta ls 

Tra ff ic $0 

Envir on m enta l $0 

Prelim in a ry E n gineer ing $0 

Fina l En gineer ing $15 ,000 $15,000 


R/W Pur cha se $120 ,000 $120,000 

Ad m instra tive $0 

Co nstru ctio n $0 




Tota ls $0 $135 ,000 $0 $0 $ 0 $135,000 

Sour c e of F un ds 2 00 9 2 010 20 11 20 12 20 13 T o ta ls 

G ener al F un d $6, 750 $6,750 


M un icipa l Bon ds $0 

Priva te F un din g $0 

FA A AI P G ra nt $128 ,250 $128,250 

$0 

Tota ls $0 $135 ,000 $0 $0 $ 0 $135,000 

26



Project: Navigational Survey & Easement - East 


Navigational survey & easement on the property to the east (Jegs) of the 

runway. This will prevent future construction from entering into flight path 

that would have adverse effects on the airport 

Department: 


Fund: 



N/A 


R E C O M M E N DE D FU N DIN G 

E s t im a te d E x pe nd it ur es 2 00 9 2 010 20 11 20 12 20 13 T o ta ls 

T ra ff ic $ 0 

E nvir on m ent a l $ 0 

P re lim in a ry E n gine er ing $ 0 

Fina l E n ginee r ing $ 1 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 ,0 0 0 

R / W C on sult a nt $ 0 

R / W P ur cha s e $ 1 1 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 1 5 ,0 0 0 

Ad m inst ra t ive $ 0 

C o nst ru ct io n $ 0 

C h an ge O rd e r/ C o nt inge n cy $ 0 

C o nst ru ct io n En ginee ring $ 0 

In s p ec t ion $ 0 

T ot a ls $ 1 3 0 ,0 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1 3 0 ,0 0 0 

So ur c e o f F un ds 2 00 9 2 010 20 11 20 12 20 13 T o ta ls 

G e ner al F un d $ 6 ,5 0 0 $ 6 ,5 0 0 

O th e r C ity Fu nd s $ 0 

M un icip a l B on d s $ 0 

P riva t e F un d in g $ 0 

FA A AI P G ra nt $ 1 2 3 ,5 0 0 $ 1 2 3 ,5 0 0 

$ 0 

T ot a ls $ 1 3 0 ,0 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1 3 0 ,0 0 0 

27



Project: Runway 10-28 Rehabilitation 


Improvements to the runway surface and runway safety area to accommodate 

increased aviation traffic. 

Department: 


Fund: 



N/A 




Traff ic $0 



Final En gineer ing $120,0 00 $120,000 




Co nstru ctio n $1,31 5,000 $1,315, 000 




Totals $0 $0 $0 $120,0 00 $1,31 5,000 $1,435, 000 


G ener al F un d $6,00 0 $65,750 $71,750 




FA A Federal D iscre tio nary $114,0 00 $1,24 9,250 $1,363, 250 

$0 

Totals $0 $0 $0 $120,0 00 $1,31 5,000 $1,435, 000 

28



Project: Ramp Expansion 


Design main ramp expansion to accommodate increased aviation traffic. 

Department: 


Fund: 



N/A 




Traff ic $0 



Final En gineer ing $90, 000 $90,000 




Co nstru ctio n $900,0 00 $900,000 




Totals $0 $0 $0 $0 $ 0 $0 


G ener al F un d $4, 500 $45,0 00 $49,500 




FA A Federal D iscre tio nary $85, 500 $855,0 00 $940,500 

$0 

Totals $0 $0 $90, 000 $900,0 00 $ 0 $990,000 

29



Project: Drainage Master Plan/Engineering/Construction 


Design Master Drainage Plan for current and future expansion needs. 

Department: 


Fund: 



This plan will ensure that all drainage facilities located on the airfield meet or 

exceed FAA criteria. This plan will address the overall drainage issues at the 

airport to ensure that any existing development and planned development will 

not adversely affect any waterways downstream from the airport property. 




Traff ic $0 


Prelimin a ry En gineer ing $80 ,000 $80,000 

Final En gineer ing $45, 000 $45,000 




Co nstru ctio n $150,0 00 $150,000 




Totals $0 $80 ,000 $45, 000 $150,0 00 $ 0 $275,000 


G ener al F un d $4, 000 $2, 250 $7,50 0 $13,750 




FA A AI P G rant $76 ,000 $42, 750 $142,5 00 $261,250 

$0 

Totals $0 $80 ,000 $45, 000 $150,0 00 $ 0 $275,000 

30



Project: Airport Road Relocation – Sawmill Parkway 


Design and construction of phase-I of Sawmill Parkway to address Airport Road 

vacating from runway relocation. 

Department: 


Fund: 



The consultant notes that the original arrangement was to extend the existing 

Airport Road to US-42 which was to be funded through an FAA grant. This was 

proposed until the Master Plan and ALP update was completed and the 

disposition of the crosswind runway determined. The master plan and ALP 

update is not complete. The crosswind runway was eliminated from the ALP 

and Airport road is now shown to be relocated south to a new location. This 

schedule is to relocate Airport Rd. in 2009/2010. FAA will fund the Airport 

Road relocation in an amount equal to the cost to extend Airport Road as 

originally planned, which is estimated at $1,000,000. 




P re lim in a ry E n gine er ing $ 0 

Fina l E n ginee r ing $ 0 

R / W C on sult a nt $ 0 

R / W P ur cha s e $ 0 

Ad m inst ra t ive $ 1 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 ,0 0 0 

C o nst ru ct io n $ 9 9 0 ,0 0 0 $ 9 9 0 ,0 0 0 

C h an ge O rd e r/ C o nt inge n cy $ 0 

C o nst ru ct io n En ginee ring $ 0 

In s p ec t ion $ 0 

T ot a ls $ 1 ,0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1 ,0 0 0 , 0 0 0 


G e ner al F un d $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 

O th e r C ity Fu nd s $ 0 



FA A Fed e ra l D is ret ion a ry $ 9 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 9 5 0 ,0 0 0 

$ 0 

T ot a ls $ 1 ,0 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1 ,0 0 0 , 0 0 0 

31



Project: Terminal Building Improvements 


Expansion of existing pilot lounge and install of sleep room for pilots, re-side 

and re-roof existing building. 

Department: 


Fund: 



N/A 



E st im a te d E x pe nd it ur es 2 00 9 2 010 20 11 20 12 20 13 T o ta ls 

Fina l E n gineer ing $ 0 

R / W P ur cha se $ 0 

Ad m inst ra t ive $ 0 

C o nst ru ct io n $ 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 

In sp ection $ 0 

T ot a ls $ 0 $ 0 $ 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 


G ener al F un d $ 0 

FA A Fed era l D iscre tio na ry $ 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 



Sta te /F ed era l $ 0 $ 0 

$ 0 

T ot a ls $ 0 $ 0 $ 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 

32


STREET MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENTS 

2009 - 2013 

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 

REVENUES: 

PERMISSIVE TAX (License Fee Fund) 360,000 370,000 380,000 390,000 390,000 

STATE LICENSE FEES 17,755 17,755 0 20,000 20,000 

STATE GASOLINE TAXES 79,500 79,500 80,000 85,000 85,000 

NEW GAS TAXES 340,000 380,000 400,000 410,000 410,000 

CDBG BLOCK GRANT (FORMULA FUNDS) 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 

SIDEWALK PROGRAM ASSESSMENTS 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 

ISSUE II POINT PHASE 1 370,656 0 0 0 0 

COUNTY ISSUE II POINT 50,000 0 0 0 0 

CIP Allocation 136,768 176,906 189,090 170,561 168,761 

TOTAL REVENUE 1,589,679 1,259,161 1,284,090 1,310,561 1,308,761 

EXPENDITURES: 

DEBT SERVICE 

Bonds - S. Houk Road ($600,000, 10yrs) 75,561 75,561 75,561 75,561 73,761 


STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM 

CDBG Rehabilitation 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 

City Street Resurfacintg/Maintenance 226,718 798,600 823,529 850,000 850,000 

TOTAL STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM 311,718 883,600 908,529 935,000 935,000 

STREET IMPROVEMENTS 

Point Phase 1 927,400 0 0 0 0 

TOTAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS 927,400 0 0 0 0 

OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 

CSX Improvement (Crossing Pavement) 

Traffic Signalization 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 

Sidewalk and ADA access 25,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 

Sidewalk Program City Repairs 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 

Sidewalk Program Property Owner Repairs 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 

TOTAL OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 275,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,589,679 1,259,161 1,284,090 1,310,561 1,308,761 

33


34



Sidewalk Program 


Repair & replacement of existing sidewalks in various sections of the 

community through an annual sidewalk capital program initiative. 

Department: 

Engineering Services 

Fund: 

Capital Improvement Fund (Fund 410) 


Repairs are required, per city code section 909, by property owners; however 

the city can completed the repairs at the election of the property owner, and 

invoice the property owner for the cost of the work. 

Pictures and Drawings: 

35


Reimbursement to the city is either by direct payment, an agreed upon 

payment plan, or by tax assessment if required for uncooperative property 

owners. 

RE C O M M E N D E D F U N D IN G 

E st im a te d E x pe nd it ur e s 200 9 201 0 2 01 1 2 01 2 2 01 3 T o t a ls 

Sid ew a lk & A DA A ccess $ 2 5 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 2 5 ,0 0 0 

Sid ew a lk P rg m C it y R ep a irs $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 5 0 ,0 0 0 

Sid ew a lk P rg m P r op O w ner $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 7 5 0 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 2 2 5 ,0 0 0 $ 2 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 ,2 2 5 ,0 0 0 

So u rc e o f F un ds 200 9 201 0 2 01 1 2 01 2 2 01 3 T o t a ls 

G ener al Fun d 

Sid ew a lk P ro gr am As sm nt s $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 7 5 0 ,0 0 0 

O th er C ity Fu nd s $ 7 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 4 7 5 ,0 0 0 

P riv at e F un d ing 

St a t e/ Fed era l 

T ot a ls $ 2 2 5 ,0 0 0 $ 2 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 ,2 2 5 ,0 0 0 

36



Annual Street Resurfacing 


Annual program to maintain the surface course of pavement through mill & fill, 

overlay, slurry seal, and asphalt rejuvenator applications to select city streets. 

Without adequate funding, the focus of the program continues to be on 

preventative maintenance processes on local streets, deferring necessary 

surface course replacement until future years. 

Department: 

Engineering Services & Public Works 

Fund: 


License Fee (Fund 202) 

Inflow/Infiltration (Fund 541) 


To improve the integrity of city streets for the safety of the traveling public, and 

to protect the city from unaffordable projects that involve total replacement of 

roadways that results from the lack of adequate preventative maintenance 

operations. 

Pictures/Images 

37


It is recommended that the funding for this program be gradually increased to 

a level that coincides with the calculated amount necessary to properly 

maintain the city street network as a whole (according to the city’s pavement 

maintenance software and recommendations from experts). Small percentage 

of funding is recommended to come from Fund 541 for manhole casting 

improvements that are traditionally made part of this project. 

R EC OM M EN D ED F UN D IN G 

Es tim a te d Expe nditure s 2 0 0 9 2 0 10 2 0 11 2 0 12 2 0 13 To ta ls 

Res urfacing P ro gram $ 311,718 $ 883,600 $ 908,529 $ 935,000 $ 935,000 $ 3,973,847 

To tals $ 311,718 $ 883,600 $ 908,529 $ 935,000 $ 935,000 $ 3,973,847 

S o urc e o f F unds 2 0 0 9 2 0 10 2 0 11 2 0 12 2 0 13 To ta ls 

General Fund 

CDBG Rehabilitatio n $ 85,000 $ 85,000 $ 85,000 $ 85,000 $ 85,000 $ 425,000 

Other City Funds /Gas Tax $ 226,718 $ 798,600 $ 823,529 $ 850,000 $ 850,000 $ 3,548,847 

P rivate Funding 

State/Federal 

To tals $ 311,718 $ 883,600 $ 908,529 $ 935,000 $ 935,000 $ 3,973,847 

38



Project: Annual Traffic Signalization Improvements 


The traffic signalization program provides annual funding for major signal 

equipment upgrades and installations for the over 58 existing and proposed 

signalized intersection locations in the city. 

Department: 

Public Works & Department of Engineering Services 

Fund: 



Advances upgrades to signal system equipment including L.E.D. bulb 

changeover, battery back-up installation, and closed loop interconnect 

improvements. 


R E C O M M E N D E D F U N D IN G 

E s tim a te d E x p e n d itu r e s 2 0 0 8 2 0 0 9 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 T o ta ls 

T r a ffic S ig n a liz a tio n $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 5 0 ,0 0 0 

T o ta ls $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 5 0 ,0 0 0 

S o u r c e o f F u n d s 2 0 0 8 2 0 0 9 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 T o ta ls 

C a p ita l Im p r o v e m e n ts $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 5 0 ,0 0 0 

T o ta ls $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 5 0 ,0 0 0 

39



The Point Intersection - Phase I Improvements 


This project is Phase I of a two phase project. It consists of the realignment of 

SR 37 in the eastbound direction to a proposed intersection on US 36 

approximately 300 feet west of the existing US 36/SR 37 “The Point” 

intersection. As part of the realignment, an eastbound left turn lane will be 

included for EBLT to Moore Street. The newly configured intersection on US 36 

will include the installation of a mast arm traffic signal, which will replace the 

existing traffic signal located at the existing intersection. The intersection will 

also include the alignment of a future public road (south leg of the intersection) 

along with the necessary widening on US 36 to install a westbound left turn 

lane. 

Department: 


Fund: 


OPWC Round 23/24 SCIP/LTIP grant for 44% 

$50,000 County Engineer Funds 

Pictures/Images: 

40


The existing intersection operates at a LOS of E and has an intersection delay 

of 69.2 seconds during the peak hours. With these improvements, the LOS will 

improve to a C and the intersection delay will be reduced to 29.1 seconds 

during the peak hours. The 95 th % Queue Length for westbound US 36/SR 37 

will be reduced from 1175’ to 400’ and for eastbound SR 37 it will be reduced 

from 720’ to 500’. The installation of the traffic signal at the newly configured 

intersection to the west and the removal of the existing traffic signal at the 

existing intersection will provide additional westbound US 36 stacking allowing 

for the free flow of the westbound SR 37 traffic during most hours of 

operation. The improvements will also provide a signalized access point along 

with a left turn lane for ODOT, the City Public Works Facility, future business 

property, and a future public street connection. 


Project was submitted for OPWC Round 23/24 SCIP/LTIP grant funding 

assistance. Requested OPWC amount funding is 44% of project cost. 

Delaware County has verbally committed $50,000 towards the project. 



T ra ff ic 

E nv ir on m ent a l 

P relim in a ry E n gine ering 

Fina l E n gineer ing $ 8 5 ,0 0 0 $ 8 5 ,0 0 0 

R / W C on sult a nt 

R / W P ur cha se $ 5 ,0 0 0 $ 5 ,0 0 0 

Ad m instra t ive $ 1 ,0 0 0 $ 1 ,0 0 0 

C o nst ru ction $ 6 9 7 ,0 0 0 $ 6 9 7 ,0 0 0 

C h an ge O r d er/ C o nt ing enc y $ 6 9 ,7 0 0 $ 6 9 ,7 0 0 

C o nst ru ction E ngin eering $ 1 7 ,4 2 5 $ 1 7 ,4 2 5 

In sp ect ion $ 5 2 ,2 7 5 $ 5 2 ,2 7 5 

T ot a ls $ 9 2 7 ,4 0 0 $ 9 2 7 ,4 0 0 



O th er C ity Fu nd s $ 5 0 6 ,7 4 4 $ 5 0 6 ,7 4 4 

M un icip a l B on d s 


St a t e/ Fed era l $ 3 7 0 ,6 5 6 $ 3 7 0 ,6 5 6 

In H ou se (E ng ineer in g) $ 0 

C o un ty Fu nd s $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 9 2 7 ,4 0 0 $ 9 2 7 ,4 0 0 

42


TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS 

2009 - 2013 

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 

REVENUES: 

CIP ALLOCATION 181,489 175,784 0 0 0 

COUNTY CONTRIBUTION - ISSUE II 50,000 50,000 0 0 0 

STATE ISSUE II 

Belle Avenue Intersection 

US36/Houk Rd. Turn Lane Improvements 160,151 

William/Cheshire/Channing Intersection 27,060 221,216 

US23/SR315 INTERSECTION 

ODOT 25,000 125,000 100,000 250,000 1,611,000 

MORPC ALLOCATION 

US 23/Pennsylvania Interchange 200,000 150,000 0 0 0 

VETERAN'S PARKWAY 

Federal Funds 400,000 3,000,000 6,000,000 42,950,000 

TOTAL REVENUE 1,043,700 3,722,000 100,000 6,250,000 44,561,000 

EXPENDITURES: 

MORPC TRANSPORTATION PLANNING 

Veteran's Parkway - Alt. 16 400,000 3,000,000 6,000,000 42,950,000 

US23/Pennsylvania Intersection 200,000 150,000 0 0 0 

DEVELOPMENT IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 

GRADY BLVD. IMPROVEMENTS 0 

Intersection Improvements 0 

ISSUE II IMPROVEMENTS 

BELLE AVENUE INTERSECTION 

US36/HOUK RD. TURN LANE IMPROVEMENTS 357,200 

WILLIAM & CHESHIRE/CHANNING INTERSECT. 61,500 447,000 

CHANNING ST. INTERSECTION 0 0 0 

OLENTANGY ST. INTERSECTION/BIKE PATH 0 0 0 

US 36 CURTIS ST. TURN LANE INTERSECTION 0 0 

US 23/SR 315 INTERSECTION 25,000 125,000 100,000 250,000 1,611,000 

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,043,700 3,722,000 100,000 6,250,000 44,561,000 

PURPOSE: The Transportation Improvement CIP identifies future improvements/expansion of the 

City's public works infrastructure. 

FUNDING SOURCE: Funding for these projects comes primarily from the Federal and State 

governments in the form of grants and allocated federal and state revenues. The City's matching 

contributions and funding for projects not receiving grant funding comes from the same sources 

used for street maintenance projects. 

43



US 36 & Houk Road Turn Lane Improvements 


Construction of dedicated southbound right turn lane and lengthening of the 

existing southbound left turn lane on Houk Road at US-36. Project involves 

widening of an existing culvert and signal modifications to accommodate the 

new lane configuration. 

Department: 


Fund and Account: 


OPWC LTIP Grant ($160,151) 

Delaware County Engineer ($50,000) 


Project was prioritized based on previous City Council concerns over this 

intersection. The project has been awarded OPWC LTIP Grant funds for design 

and construction. 


Funding was awarded by OPWC LTIP grant for this project in Round 22 (2008), 

in addition to a contribution from the County. Final engineering for the project 

commenced in 2008. Recommended funding slightly higher than OPWC 

estimates in an attempt to cover anticipated rise in material prices. 



Fina l E n ginee r ing $ 5 ,0 0 0 $ 5 ,0 0 0 

R / W P ur cha s e $ 3 ,7 0 0 $ 3 ,7 0 0 

Ad m inst ra t ive $ 1 ,0 0 0 $ 1 ,0 0 0 

C o nst ru ct io n $ 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 

C h an ge O rd e r/ C o nt inge n cy $ 3 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 0 ,0 0 0 

C o nst ru ct io n En ginee ring $ 2 ,5 0 0 $ 2 ,5 0 0 

In s p ec t ion $ 1 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 3 5 7 ,2 0 0 $ 3 5 7 ,2 0 0 


O th e r C ity Fu nd s $ 1 4 7 ,0 4 9 $ 1 4 7 ,0 4 9 

Sta te /F ed e ra l $ 1 6 0 ,1 5 1 $ 1 6 0 ,1 5 1 

D e law a re C ou nt y $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 3 5 7 ,2 0 0 $ 3 5 7 ,2 0 0 

45


46



US 36 & Cheshire-Channing Intersection Improvements 


The project involves widening US 36 to provide left turn lanes for traffic from 

US 36 westbound to Ann Street and Cheshire Street and US 36 eastbound to 

Channing Street. Also included is the conversion of Channing Street to “oneway” 

to the north and the establishment of a dedicated bus loading zone on the 

east side of Channing Street for the adjacent school. The traffic signal at Ann 

Street will be removed and a new mast arm signal will be installed at Cheshire 

Street and coordinated with an updated mast arm signal at Channing Street. 

Department: 


Fund: 


OPWC SCIP/LTIP Grant Funding (44% of construction) 

$50,000 County Engineer Funds 


Recent traffic analysis indicates that a signal is warranted at US 36 and 

Cheshire Street and a signal is no longer warranted at US 36 and Ann Street. 

Left turn movements from US 36 to both Cheshire Street and Channing Street 

obstruct through traffic movements, especially during the peak traffic hours. 

Travel direction and access changes along Channing Street, between US 36 

and Winter Street, are included to improve the safety of the school bus loading 

zone and the signal operation at US 36. Most importantly, with the 

consideration of other roadway improvements to The Point, the traffic demand 

on this intersection will be greater. 

Pictures and Drawings: See drawing on next page 

47


The project was submitted for OPWC SCIP/LTIP Round 23/24 grant funding 

assistance. Requested amount of funding is $221,216. Delaware County has 

verbally committed $50,000 towards the project. 

R E C O MM E N D E D F U N D IN G 

E st im a t e d E x p e nd it ur e s 2 00 9 20 10 20 11 201 2 2 01 3 To t als 

T ra f f ic 

E n vi r on m ent al 

P re li m ina r y E n gi nee r ing 

F in a l E ng in eer in g $ 6 0 ,0 0 0 $ 6 0 , 0 0 0 

R / W C on su lta n t 

R / W P ur ch a se $ 1 , 5 0 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 

A d m i nst ra ti ve $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 

C on str u cti on $ 3 8 5 , 0 0 0 $ 3 8 5 , 0 0 0 

C ha n ge O rd er / C o nti ng enc y $ 3 8 ,5 0 0 $ 3 8 , 5 0 0 

C on str u cti on E n gi ne er in g $ 2 , 5 0 0 $ 2 , 5 0 0 

In sp e cti on $ 2 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 0 , 0 0 0 

T ota l s $ 6 1 ,5 0 0 $ 4 4 7 , 0 0 0 $ 5 0 8 , 5 0 0 

S o u rc e o f F un d s 2 00 9 20 10 20 11 201 2 2 01 3 To t als 

G en er a l F u nd 

O th er C ity F u nd s $ 3 4 ,4 4 0 $ 1 7 5 , 7 8 4 $ 2 1 0 , 2 2 4 

M u ni cip a l B o nd s 

P ri va te F un d i ng 

S ta te / F ed e ra l $ 2 7 ,0 6 0 $ 2 2 1 , 2 1 6 $ 2 4 8 , 2 7 6 

D el a w a r e C o un ty $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 , 0 0 0 

T ota l s $ 6 1 ,5 0 0 $ 4 4 7 , 0 0 0 $ 5 0 8 , 5 0 0 

49



US 23 – SR 315 Intersection Improvements 


The project will begin with the preparation of a safety study that will include 

the U. S. Route 23/State Route 315/Stratford Road Intersection and the U. S. 

Route 23/Pollock Road. The realignment of State Route315 and Stratford Road 

intersection will be evaluated along with signal retiming for the existing 

intersections. If the safety study results in a conclusion that requires 

additional preliminary engineering and planning, the consultant will then be 

scoped to complete the Steps of the Minor Project Development Process as 

directed by the City and ODOT. 

Department: 


Fund: 


HSP (Highway Safety Program Funds) – $1,156,003 

Federal Earmark for US 23 – $850,850 

TRC (ODOT Toll Revenue Credits) - $128,445 


The safety and efficiency of this intersection is critical to the entire US 23 

corridor through the city. The project was initially identified by ODOT’s US 23 

Access Management Plan as an intersection requiring improvement. 


Funding is from a combination of state Highway Safety Project (HSP) Funds, 

ODOT earmark funds and Toll Revenue Credits (TRC’s) which are to be applied 

to offset the city’s required 20% cost of the R/W and construction costs, and 

100% of the design. Project start has been delayed due to ODOT’s requirement 

to repeat the consultant selection process. All design expenses are 

reimbursable on an as-invoiced basis through ODOT. City will have to fund PE 

portion directly, though reimbursement is 100%. R/W, utility relocation and 

construction is 100% city funded. Documented TRC, earmark, and HSP funds 

allocated to the project total $2,135,298. 

50

Recommended Funding Cont’d.: 



T ra ff ic $ 2 5 ,0 0 0 $ 2 5 ,0 0 0 

E nvir on m ent a l $ 7 5 ,0 0 0 $ 7 5 ,0 0 0 

P re lim in a ry E n gine er ing $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 

Fina l E n ginee r ing $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 


R / W P ur cha s e $ 2 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 5 0 ,0 0 0 

Ad m inst ra t ive $ 1 ,0 0 0 $ 1 ,0 0 0 

C o nst ru ct io n $ 1 ,4 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 ,4 0 0 , 0 0 0 

C h an ge O rd e r/ C o nt inge n cy $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 

C o nst ru ct io n En ginee ring $ 1 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 ,0 0 0 

In s p ec t ion $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 2 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 2 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 ,6 1 1 ,0 0 0 $ 2 ,1 1 1 , 0 0 0 


G e ner al F un d 

O th e r C ity Fu nd s 


P riva t e F un d in g 

Sta te /F ed e ra l $ 2 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 2 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 ,6 1 1 ,0 0 0 $ 2 ,1 1 1 , 0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 2 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 2 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 ,6 1 1 ,0 0 0 $ 2 ,1 1 1 , 0 0 0 

51


52



US 23-Pennsylvania Avenue Interchange Improvements 


Project includes the study, design, and construction of a modified interchange 

to provide full movement access between Pennsylvania Avenue and US-23. 

Department: 


Fund: 


MORPC STP Sub-allocation Funds 



Ongoing study of interchange modifications which commenced in 2005 and 

administered through the ODOT 10-Step Minor PDP process. Initial project 

study costs are being funded utilizing State STP-M funding through the annual 

MORPC allocation toward Delaware. 

53


Project continues under preliminary development in the ODOT PDP process for 

minor projects. All design expenses are 100% reimbursable through ODOT. 

Construction could begin in 2012 and is a candidate for funding split of 80% 

MORPC funds (STP) and 20% City funds (as is right-of-way purchase). Based 

on the projected 2012 STP available funds to cover remaining environmental 

and engineering costs (this project only), approximately $2,600,000 should be 

available for right-of-way and construction cost reimbursement. Our current 

estimate for right-of-way and construction is $2,875,000 (80% of this amount 

is $2,300,000). 



T ra ff ic 

E nv ir on m ent a l $ 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 

P relim in a ry E n gine ering $ 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 

Fina l E n gineer ing $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 


R / W P ur cha se 

Ad m instra t ive 

C o nst ru ction 

C h an ge O r d er/ C o nt ing ency 

C o nst ru ction E ngin eering 

In sp ect ion 

T ot a ls $ 2 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 5 0 ,0 0 0 



O th er C ity Fu nd s 



St a t e/ Fed era l $ 2 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 5 0 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 3 5 0 ,0 0 0 

54



Veterans Parkway 


Planning, design, and construction of a limited access highway from the US 23 

to the intersection of Glenn Road and Mill Run Crossing (as recently defined in 

determining the study area with ODOT). Identified as a Tier II project on 

ODOT’s TRAC list (PID 80824) – called the Delaware Southeast By-Pass. Project 

AKA Alternate #16 from the 2001 Thoroughfare Plan. 

Department: 


Fund: 



Project is identified as a high priority project on the City’s thoroughfare plan by 

both the City and County. $4.48 million in federal earmark funds were 

authorized in the current SAFETEA-LU Transportation bill supported by U.S. 

House of Representative Patrick Tiberi’s office, with up to $4,082,813 Million 

available for the project study and design. The City’s 20% matching obligation 

for the federal earmark funds is to be offset by ODOT assigned TRC’s (Toll 

Revenue Credits). 


Project must follow the ODOT 14-Step Project Development Process (PDP). 

Project negotiations were completed with professional service contract approved 

in June 6, 2008 for $356,491 which has been encumbered through ODOT. 

City to front cost of all design work with reimbursement on an as-invoiced 

basis. Also, Senator Voinovich, Congressman Tiberi, and Senator Brown all 

submitted an appropriation questionnaire for FY 2009 for $38 million in 

additional federal earmark request for construction funding, though approval is 

unlikely. 

Recommended funding for construction is based on assumptions made during 

pre-planning process, absent of a preferred alignment. Estimates are provided 

only to illustrate the magnitude of the construction costs. Estimates based on 

2.6 miles of two-lane “super-two” highway and four (4) bridges. 

2013+ costs are shown to capture the magnitude of future additional funds 

required for the project construction and it is anticipated that the actual 

schedule for construction will be revised to subsequent years. 

55

Recommended Funding Cont’d: 



T ra ff ic 

E nvir on m ent a l 

P re lim in a ry E n gine er ing $ 4 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 4 0 0 ,0 0 0 

Fina l E n ginee r ing $ 3 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 ,0 0 0 , 0 0 0 


R / W P ur cha s e $ 6 , 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 6 ,0 0 0 , 0 0 0 

Ad m inst ra t ive 

C o nst ru ct io n $ 3 7 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 7 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 

C h an ge O rd e r/ C o nt inge n cy $ 3 ,7 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 ,7 0 0 , 0 0 0 

C o nst ru ct io n En ginee ring $ 2 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 5 0 ,0 0 0 

In s p ec t ion $ 2 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 ,0 0 0 , 0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 4 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 6 , 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 4 2 ,9 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 2 ,3 5 0 ,0 0 0 


G e ner al F un d $ 0 

O th e r C ity Fu nd s 



Sta te /F ed e ra l $ 4 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 ,4 0 0 , 0 0 0 

Fu tu re Fed er era l Fu nd in g $ 6 , 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 4 2 ,9 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 4 8 ,9 5 0 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 4 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 6 , 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 4 2 ,9 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 2 ,3 5 0 ,0 0 0 

56


This pictures shows the study area for Veteran’s Parkway. 

57

REVENUES: 


PARKS IMPROVEMENT FUND 

2009 - 2013 

2009 - 2013 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 

Neighborhood Park Exaction Fees 315,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 

ODNR Grant 

CIP Allocation 0 37,200 14,000 17,500 10,000 

TOTAL REVENUES 315,000 52,200 29,000 32,500 25,000 

EXPENDITURES: 

COMMUNITY PARKS 

MINGO PARK 

- Gym Floor Replacement 36,000 

GLEN ROSS PARK 

- Park Construction 240,000 

SMITH PARK 

- Field Improvements 0 10,000 

NEIGHBORHOOD PARK IMPROVEMENTS 75,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 

PARKING LOT RESURFACING/SEAL COATING 

- Eastside Park 1,200 

- Smith Park 14,000 

- Mingo and Blue Limestone 17,500 

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 315,000 52,200 29,000 32,500 25,000 

PURPOSE: The Parks Improvement Fund/ Non-Impact Fee Plan identifies future improvements 

to the City's parks and recreation system that cannot be funded from parks impact fees. 

FUNDING SOURCES: The projects in this plan are funded by an allocation of the general fund 

income tax proceeds. Grant funds are also leveraged when possible to offset the cost to the 

general fund. The City also has a parks exaction policy that requires new developers to dedicate 

parkland for public recreational purposes of approximately 10% of the acreage developed. In 

lieu of the required land dedication, Council may accept cash equivalent to the value of the land 

otherwise required to be dedicated. These funds are allocated in this plan. 

59



Project: Parking Lot/Pavement Resurfacing 


Seal coating parking lots/pavement in parks to extend the life of the existing 

pavement. 

Department: 


Fund: 

Park Improvement Fund 


Seal coating extends the life of the pavement, improves aesthetics of the parks, 

and eliminates safety hazards from holes or cracks. 




M ingo a nd B lue L im est on e 

E a st Sid e P a r k / R heem St . $ 1 ,2 0 0 $ 1 ,2 0 0 

Sm ith P a rk $ 1 4 ,0 0 0 $ 1 4 ,0 0 0 

M ingo a nd B lue L im est on e $ 1 7 ,5 0 0 $ 1 7 ,5 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 3 2 ,7 0 0 


G ener al Fun d $ 1 ,2 0 0 $ 1 4 ,0 0 0 $ 1 7 ,5 0 0 $ 3 2 ,7 0 0 





T ot a ls $ 0 $ 1 ,2 0 0 $ 1 4 ,0 0 0 $ 1 7 ,5 0 0 $ 3 2 ,7 0 0 

61



Project: Gym Floor Replacement 


Replace existing gym floor with new tiles, underlayment and molding. 

Department: 


Fund: 



The flooring tiles currently in the gym are original to the facility. They are 

worn, coming loose in places, and are beginning to pose safety concerns. The 

gym has received a large increase in usage with the upgrades at Mingo Park 

and the gym floor won’t hold up as is much longer. In order to upgrade 

programming, increase the number of activities in the gym, and to maintain 

safety the floor needs to be addressed within the next 2 years. 




G ym F loor $ 3 6 ,0 0 0 $ 3 6 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 3 6 ,0 0 0 $ 3 6 ,0 0 0 


G ener al Fun d $ 3 6 ,0 0 0 $ 3 6 ,0 0 0 





T ot a ls $ 3 6 ,0 0 0 $ 3 6 ,0 0 0 

62



Project: Smith Park Field Improvements 


Improve the fields at Smith Park to improve field conditions and drainage on 

each of the four fields. Field improvements needed include bringing in soil and 

regarding the infields on each of the four fields. Install dugouts at each of the 

four fields (8 dugouts). The dugouts would be built in-house and would be 

built using a concrete pad and concrete blocks, with posts going up to a roof. 

Currently we only have benches with no dugout fencing or separation. Build 

SST Waterless restrooms on the site to provide improved restroom facilities and 

to alleviate the on-going rentals of the port-a-johns currently in use. The 

waterless restrooms could then be converted once city water reaches Smith 

Park. 

Department: 


Fund: 

Capital Improvements Fund (Fund 410) 


Smith Park is one of our three community parks in Delaware. As a community 

park, the appearance and functionality of the park reflects on our entire park 

system and image of the city as a whole. It is the home of our adult softball 

fields and has the potential to become more of a destination for teams and 

tournaments. The field conditions are below average due to drainage issues 

and the site as a whole is in need of improvements (dugouts, restrooms) to 

provide an environment competitive with those found at other similar facilities 

that our players and potential players can access. 




V ar iou s im p r ovem ent s $ 1 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 1 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 ,0 0 0 


G ener al F un d $ 1 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 ,0 0 0 


T ot a ls $ 1 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 ,0 0 0 

63


EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 

2009 - 2013 

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 

BALANCES FORWARD 303,598 372,398 56,898 18,398 132,398 

REVENUES: 


TOTAL REVENUE 275,000 500,000 775,000 700,000 765,000 

EXPENDITURES: 

PUBLIC WORKS 

Pickup Trucks 0 115,000 20,000 15,000 

2 Ton Dump Truck 0 95,000 97,000 0 104,000 

1 Ton Dump Truck 99,000 

1 Ton Sign Truck 46,000 

Street Sweeper (3yr. Lease) 55,000 55,000 55,000 

Tandem Axle Dump Truck 116,000 

Backhoe 91,500 

Loader 110,000 

Skid Steer 33,000 

Crack Seal Machine 55,000 

Asphalt Roller 38,000 

Asphalt Saw 32,000 

Asphalt Planner 10,500 

Utility Van 21,500 

TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS 55,000 330,500 419,500 168,500 290,000 

PARKS AND RECREATION 

3/4 Ton Pickup Truck 0 24,000 25,000 

72" Outfront Mower 9,200 13,000 14,000 15,000 15,000 

45 HP 4WD Tractor 24,000 

55 HP Tractor 28,000 

1 Ton Dump Truck 55,000 

TOTAL PARKS AND RECREATION 9,200 61,000 67,000 70,000 15,000 

AIRPORT 

Rebuilt Tug 5,500 

Ground Power Unit 12,000 

Utility Vehicle 14,000 

Jet A Truck 56,500 

TOTAL AIRPORT 14,000 0 12,000 56,500 5,500 

POLICE DEPARTMENT 

Police Cruiser Replacements 128,000 134,000 140,000 146,000 146,000 

Detective Vehicle 25,000 

Chief Car 25,000 

Weight Enforcement Truck 25,000 

Parking Control Vehicle 20,000 

TOTAL POLICE 128,000 159,000 190,000 166,000 146,000 

FIRE DEPARTMENT 

EMS Medic Vehicle Replacement 240,000 250,000 

Vehicle Replacement 25,000 

Engine Truck Replacement (Lease Payment) 65,000 

Fire Ladder Replacement (Lease Payment) 125,000 125,000 125,000 

TOTAL FIRE 0 265,000 125,000 125,000 440,000 


CARRY OVER BALANCE 372,398 56,898 18,398 132,398 898 

PURPOSE: The Equipment Replacement Fund schedules replacement of existing equipment 

utilized in the Public Works, Parks and Recreation, and Airport. The fund also schedules 

replacement of Police and Fire vehicles not covered by impact fees. 

FUNDING SOURCE: Funding for these equipment purchases comes from the general income 

tax allocation. 

65



Equipment: Public Works Equipment Replacement 


The Public Works Department vehicles are used for variety of roadway and 

public works projects. Vehicles and equipment is replaced based on a vehicle 

replacement schedule based on the number of hours of operations and mileage 

and service needs. 

Department: 

Public Works Department 

Fund: 

Equipment Replacement Fund (Fund 440) 


The Public Works Department uses a replacement schedule to minimize the 

overall maintenance costs and depreciation loss to the City for equipment 

expenditures. The proposed purchases will replace items that range from 8 to 

12 years old. 


RE CO M M E ND ED F UND ING 

E st im a t ed Expe n dit ur e s 2 00 9 20 10 201 1 2 012 20 13 + T ota l s 

U tility V a n $21 ,500 $21,5 00 

Picku p tru cks $115,00 0 $ 20,000 $15 ,000 $150,0 00 

2 To n D u m p $95,000 $ 97,000 $104, 000 $296,0 00 

1 To n D u m p $99 ,000 $99,0 00 

1 To n S ign Tru ck $ 46,000 $46,0 00 

Stre et Sw eeper (3 yr. Leas e $55 ,000 $55,000 $ 55,000 $165,0 00 

Ta ndem A xle D u m p $116, 000 $116,0 00 

Ba ckh oe $ 91,500 $91,5 00 

Loa der $ 110,000 $110,0 00 

Skid Steer $33 ,000 $33,0 00 

Cr ack Sea l M a chin e $55,000 $55,0 00 

As pha lt Ho t Bo x $0 

As pha lt Plan ner $10,500 $10,5 00 

As pha lt Roller $38,0 00 $38,0 00 

As pha lt Sa w $32,0 00 $32,0 00 

Tota ls $55 ,000 $330,50 0 $ 419,500 $168 ,500 $290, 000 $1, 263,500 

So ur ce of Fu nd s 2 00 9 20 10 201 1 2 012 20 13 + T ota l s 

Tra n sfer fro m CI P $55 ,000 $330,50 0 $ 419,500 $168 ,500 $290, 000 $1, 263,500 

67



Equipment: Police Equipment Replacement 


The Police Department’s vehicles are typically replaced before the vehicle 

mileage exceeds 90,000 miles and an estimated use of approximately 27,000 

miles per year. The Department usually replaces one or two vehicles a year to 

avoid large capital expenditures. This incremental approach minimizes down 

time for cruiser transition, excessive maintenance expenses and a more 

systematic approach to fleet replacement. Also, the addition of new cruisers is 

consistent with anticipated increases in the work load and work force. In 

addition to standard cruiser replacement, the Department plans to replace the 

Chief’s vehicle and CSO Vehicle in 2009, and one of the current detective 

vehicles in 2010. 

Department: 

Police Department 

Fund: 



Replacement of police vehicles based on estimated useful life, service needs, 

and mileage limits. 



E st im a t ed 

E x pe n di tu re s 20 09 2 01 0 20 11 201 2 20 13 T o ta ls 

P olice C ru is ers $ 1 2 8 ,0 0 0 $ 1 3 4 ,0 0 0 $ 1 4 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 4 6 ,0 0 0 $ 1 4 6 , 0 0 0 $ 6 9 4 ,0 0 0 

D e te ctiv e V e hic le $ 2 5 ,0 0 0 $ 2 5 ,0 0 0 

C h ie f C a r $ 2 5 ,0 0 0 $ 2 5 ,0 0 0 

C S O V ehicle $ 0 

T ru ck W e igh t E n f. $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 $ 2 5 ,0 0 0 

P a rk in g C o nt ro l $ 2 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 0 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 1 2 8 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 9 ,0 0 0 $ 1 9 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 6 6 ,0 0 0 $ 1 4 6 , 0 0 0 $ 7 8 9 ,0 0 0 

So ur ce o f Fu nd s 20 09 2 01 0 20 11 201 2 20 13 T o ta ls 

T ra n sfe r fro m C I P $ 1 2 8 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 9 ,0 0 0 $ 1 9 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 6 6 ,0 0 0 $ 1 4 6 , 0 0 0 $ 7 8 9 ,0 0 0 

68



Project: Fire Fleet Vehicle Replacement 


- Replacement of Existing Fleet Vehicles 

o Vehicle Replacement Schedule 

o Insurance Services Report – October 22, 1998 

o T.G. Fire/EMS Services Inc., 2001 Study 

o Fire Department Strategic Plan – Goals and Critical Service Gaps 

Goal #2 - Improve Facilities to Match Resource to Risk 

Reduce Response Times 

o Fire Department Strategic Plan – Service Gap 

Meet international benchmarks and standard of care 

Upgrade and modernize existing facilities 

Deployment analysis to identify appropriate location of 

facilities to meet the standards of coverage. 

Department: 

Fire Department 


General Fund (Fund 101) 

Fire Impact Fee Fund (Fund 493) 


The Fire Department fleet vehicles are aging. In 2007, the Fire Department lost 

a staff vehicle due to mechanical problems, and it has not been replaced. The 

purchase of new fleet vehicles in 2009 and 2010 would include the purchase of 

a command vehicle and a training vehicle through Impact Fees. The 

Department has proposed a plan to develop a rotation based on the 

Department’s Vehicle Replacement Plan. These vehicles would allow the 

Department to be prepared for Fire Department operations. 



E st im a t ed E x pe n dit ur e s 2 00 9 20 10 201 1 2 012 201 3 T o t a ls 

E M S M e d ic V eh R eplcm t $ 2 4 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 4 9 0 ,0 0 0 

V ehicle R ep lac em ent $ 2 5 ,0 0 0 $ 2 5 ,0 0 0 

E ng in e R ep lcm t (Le ase) $ 6 5 ,0 0 0 $ 6 5 ,0 0 0 

L a d d er R ep lcm t (L ea se) $ 1 2 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 2 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 2 5 ,0 0 0 $ 3 7 5 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 0 $ 2 6 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 2 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 2 5 ,0 0 0 $ 4 4 0 ,0 0 0 $ 9 5 5 ,0 0 0 

So ur ce o f Fu nd s 2 00 9 20 10 201 1 2 012 201 3 T o t a ls 

T ra n sfer fro m C I P $ 0 $ 2 6 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 2 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 2 5 ,0 0 0 $ 4 4 0 ,0 0 0 $ 9 5 5 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 0 $ 2 6 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 2 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 2 5 ,0 0 0 $ 4 4 0 ,0 0 0 $ 9 5 5 ,0 0 0 

69



Equipment: Airport Equipment Replacement 


Similar to other departments, the Airport uses a vehicle replacement schedule 

to replace its vehicles and or airport equipment based on estimated useful life, 

service needs, and mileage limits. 

Department: 


Fund: 



In 2009 the Department plans to add an all terrain vehicle to service airfield 

perimeter maintenance areas and drainage areas. The remaining equipment 

will be utilized to address increased demand for service. 


R E C O M M E N DE D F U N D IN G 

E st im a t ed 

E x pe n di tu re s 20 09 2 01 0 20 11 201 2 20 13 T o t a ls 

R eb u ilt T ug $ 5 ,5 0 0 $ 5 ,5 0 0 

G rou n d P ow e r Un it $ 1 2 ,0 0 0 $ 1 2 ,0 0 0 

U tilit y V eh icle $ 1 4 ,0 0 0 $ 1 4 ,0 0 0 

3 / 4 T o n P ick up $ 0 

J e t A T ru ck $ 5 6 ,5 0 0 $ 5 6 ,5 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 1 4 ,0 0 0 $ 0 $ 1 2 ,0 0 0 $ 5 6 ,5 0 0 $ 5 ,5 0 0 $ 8 8 ,0 0 0 


T ra n s fe r fro m C I P $ 1 4 ,0 0 0 $ 2 5 , 5 0 0 $ 1 2 ,0 0 0 $ 5 6 ,5 0 0 $ 5 ,5 0 0 $ 1 1 3 ,5 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 1 4 ,0 0 0 $ 2 5 , 5 0 0 $ 1 2 ,0 0 0 $ 5 6 ,5 0 0 $ 5 ,5 0 0 $ 1 1 3 ,5 0 0 

70



Project: Parks and Recreation Equipment Replacement 


The Parks and Recreation Department uses various pieces of equipment for 

special park projects as well as park mowing. Prudent replacement of 

equipment allows for optimum usage and minimizes lost time in repairs and 

service issues with damaged or inoperable equipment. 

Department: 


Fund: 



Replacement of parks and recreation department vehicles and equipment is 

based on estimated useful life, service needs, and mileage limits. Out-front 

mowers are highly maneuverable and designed to meet the varied and 

demanding conditions found in the City’s park system. Many of these models 

include hydraulic mower lifts, have shaft driven mowers and transmission and 

have power steering. In most conditions, they out-mow larger decked mowers 

due to their mowing speed tolerance, maneuverability (less trimming) and 

versatility. The purchase of a fourth mower is the result of increasing mowing 

acreage and the loss of productivity in loading and unloading mowers, 

transporting across town, etc. Having a fourth mower will allow for split 

mowing crews when efficiency would benefit. The 45 HP and 55 HP tractors 

have high powered engines with high torque and will be used for a variety of 

projects such as excavation, hauling, leveling, plowing, etc. The ¾ Ton Pick-up 

and 1 Ton Dump Truck purchases are replacement for current inventory that 

will all be 10 years old or older at time of replacement. 

71




3 / 4 To n P ick -u p $ 2 4 ,0 0 0 $ 2 5 ,0 0 0 $ 4 9 ,0 0 0 

7 2 " O ut fr on t M ow er $ 9 ,2 0 0 $ 1 3 ,0 0 0 $ 1 4 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 ,0 0 0 $ 6 6 ,2 0 0 

4 5 H P 4 W D T r act or $ 2 4 ,0 0 0 $ 2 4 ,0 0 0 

5 5 H P T ra cto r $ 2 8 ,0 0 0 $ 2 8 ,0 0 0 

1 T o n D u m p T ru ck $ 5 5 ,0 0 0 $ 5 5 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 9 ,2 0 0 $ 6 1 ,0 0 0 $ 6 7 ,0 0 0 $ 7 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 ,0 0 0 $ 2 2 2 ,2 0 0 


G ener al Fun d $ 9 ,2 0 0 $ 6 1 ,0 0 0 $ 6 7 ,0 0 0 $ 7 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 ,0 0 0 $ 2 2 2 ,2 0 0 



T ot a ls $ 9 ,2 0 0 $ 6 1 ,0 0 0 $ 6 7 ,0 0 0 $ 7 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 0 7 ,2 0 0 $ 2 2 2 ,2 0 0 

72

REVENUES: 


TECHNOLOGY IMPROVEMENTS 

2009 - 2013 

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 


TOTAL REVENUE 177,000 347,000 262,000 287,000 212,000 

EXPENDITURES: 

Telephone System Lease (5yrs. $250,000) 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 

Planning Software (5yrs. $200,000) 47,000 47,000 47,000 47,000 47,000 

Fiber/Infrastructure 0 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 

Servers/Server Hardware 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 

PC Replacement 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 

Copier Replacement 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 

Software Systems 50,000 75,000 

AS 400 PD 85,000 

PD Call Logger (see telephone sys. Sheet) 50,000 


PURPOSE: The Technology Improvements CIP identifies significant technology improvements 

necessary to address Citywide technology systems. 

FUNDING SOURCES: General fund income tax allocation. 

73

34 74


2009-2013 Capital Improvement Program 

Project Detail 

Annual Server and Network Equipment Purchases and Replacements 


Annual Server and Network Equipment Purchases and Replacements. The IT Department maintains a 

scheduled replacement of all servers in the City of a maximum of 5 years of service to the City for front-line 

services. Once a server reaches this age, the machine may be utilized in a reserve role, or its service to the City 

terminated, depending upon the condition of the hardware. A similar plan is in effect for Network equipment, 

although that equipment may be used effectively for up to 7 years, at present. 

Department: 

IT Department 

References, Appendices, Images: 

Justification: Please list any supporting goals, principles, objectives and strategies: 

In 2009, we have scheduled the removal from service of 6 servers. The functionality of each of these servers will 

require replacement. The City’s server capacity strategy is to purchase bigger servers, but to divide the use of 

the servers into virtual servers, capable of providing more capacity in fewer machines. The servers targeted for 

retirement in 2008, 6 in all, were replaced by 2 physical servers. Those two physical servers still have capacity to 

provide more services, and are being utilized in the implementation of additional software systems, such as that 

for the Planning/Development Department. 

In this category also comes additional disk capacity within the City. The City currently has 13 terabytes of data 

storage capacity. Of this, more than 50% is currently in use in some way. IT intends to extend the City’s data 

storage capacity, and evaluate disaster recovery systems, and off-site storage in order to continue to provide 

adequate file storage to the City. 

With respect to Network Equipment, the City continues to build some network redundancy, particularly between 

City Hall and the Justice Center. This requires the purchase of an additional router, so that connectivity can be 

mirrored across the fiber. With 911 consolidation, it may become critical to have two different pathways to the 

Justice Center by fiber, so that remote operations are possible. 

Backup of City Data, including High Value Data. The City now has a strategic plan for the consolidated storage 

of general information, and for High Value Data—so that all data in the City can reside, in a backup form, in one 

location. There are two synergistic goals of this strategy: (1) the desire to keep High Value Data (SSNs, personal 

information, etc.) private, and (2) to have a reliable off-site storage mechanism with an easy method to both 

recover deleted files, and to recover in the event of a disaster (DR). This strategy calls for the implementation of 

a mirrored hard drive solution at the new Public Works facility, and/or a major robotic tape library installed at the 

new Public Works facility. 

Changes and Updates: 

Public Records laws will require greater availability of information to the public. Without some sort of 

consolidation of information, the City may have difficulty in complying with these new laws. 

Recommended Funding 

E s tim a te d 

E x p e n d i tu re s 2 0 0 9 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 + T o ta ls 

S e rv e r R e p la c e m e n t 

N e t w o rk E q u ip m e n t 

$ 1 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 ,0 0 0 

$ 1 5 ,0 0 0 $ 7 5 ,0 0 0 

T o ta ls $ 1 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 ,0 0 0 $ 0 $ 7 5 ,0 0 0 

Source of Funds 

S o u r c e o f F u n d s 2 0 09 2 0 10 2 0 11 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 To ta ls 

G e n e ra l F u nd $ 1 5 ,00 0 $ 1 5 ,00 0 $1 5 ,0 00 $1 5 ,0 00 $1 5 ,0 00 $ 7 5 ,0 0 0 

O th e r C ity F un d s $0 

M u n ic ip al B on d s $0 

P riv a te Fu n d in g $0 

S tate /F ed e ral $0 

O th e r G ra n ts $0 

T o ta l $ 1 5 ,00 0 $ 1 5 ,00 0 $1 5 ,0 00 $1 5 ,0 00 $1 5 ,0 00 $ 7 5 ,0 0 0 

75




Police Department AS/400 Replacement 


Police Department AS/400 Replacement. The City’s Police Department currently utilizes the CHIEFS software 

system, which can only successfully reside on IBM AS/400 mid-range computers. The current AS/400 is 

approximately 7 years old. 

Department: 

IT Department 



In 2007, the City spent approximately $8,000 in order to extend the life of the City’s AS/400 computer system. 

The system, which is now beyond end-of-life from a manufacturer’s perspective (IBM no longer supports the 

machine), will eventually fail. While these machines are true workhorses among computers, if the Police 

Department intends to continue to use the CHIEFS software system, will need to be replaced. 



E s tim a ted 

E x p en d itu re s 2 0 09 2 0 10 2 0 11 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4 + T o tals 

S erve r 

R ep la c e m e n t $ 7 0 ,00 0 $ 7 0,0 0 0 

E qu ip m e n t 

U pg ra de s $ 0 

D R /C o nso lid a tio n $ 1 5 ,00 0 $ 1 5,0 0 0 

T o ta ls $ 8 5 ,00 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 8 5,0 0 0 


So u rc e o f Fu n ds 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2013+ T o tals 

G e neral F und $ 85,000 $0 $0 $ 85,000 

O ther C ity F unds $0 

M u nicipal B onds $0 

P riva te Fu nding $0 

S tate/F edera l $0 

O ther G ra nts $0 

T otal $ 0 $ 85,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $ 85,000 

76




PC Replacements 


PC Replacements 

Department: 

IT Department 



Commonly, technology used by users in the City will last 3 to 5 years, with those using 5 years having 

significantly fewer abilities to get high productivity out of their pcs as those using 3 year or younger equipment. 

We attempt to replace all pcs within a 4 year cycle in order to keep productivity as high as possible from a 

technology point of view. 


Each year, the City typically identifies from 30 to 40 computers which are the highest need candidates for 

replacement. 

The City is currently investigating installation of “Thin Client” computers, rather than pcs for most departmental 

users. The primary advantages to this approach are: (1) lower cost of replacement (at a certain point), (2) 

lower cost of deployment, (3) standardized user experiences, (4) lower cost of antivirus and other 

management software systems, (4) lower energy cost, (5) longer lifecycle, (6) lower maintenance cost of 

machines (no moving parts). In order to achieve this, we have to acquire additional servers (about 1 for each 

25 users). In the long term, it should mean overall lower operating cost for all departments except 

Engineering, and possibly planning and GIS, where high-end graphics capabilities are required. 

For the next several years, the IT Department will be purchasing a combination of PCs and Servers/thin client 

computers within the PC Replacement line item. This will permit the City to take as large an advantage from 

the thin client implementation perspective, while still taking into consideration the trade-offs associated with 

thin client computing. 

Also included in this Project are Laptops, Monitors, Peripherals, and Projectors. 

Not included in this Project, are replacements for printers, which are not contained in any CIP Project. 


E stim ate d 

E xp e nd itur e s 2 0 09 2 0 10 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 2 0 1 4+ T ota ls 

P C s/T hi n 

L a p top s 

P rin ters 

M o n itors 

$ 3 5 ,00 0 $ 3 5 ,0 00 $3 5 ,0 00 $3 5 ,0 00 $3 5 ,0 00 $ 17 5 ,0 00 

$ 0 

P e rip h e ra ls $ 0 

P ro je ctors $ 0 

T o ta ls $ 3 5 ,00 0 $ 3 5 ,0 00 $3 5 ,0 00 $3 5 ,0 00 $3 5 ,0 00 $ 0 $ 17 5 ,0 00 


So urce o f Fu nd s 2009 2 010 2011 2012 2 013 2014+ To ta ls 

G e nera l F u nd $ 35,00 0 $35,000 $3 5,000 $35,0 00 $35,000 $175,000 

O th er C ity F unds $0 

M unicipal B on ds $0 

P rivate Fu nding $0 

S tate/F ederal $0 

O th er G rants $0 

T ota l $ 35,00 0 $35,000 $3 5,000 $35,0 00 $35,000 $ 0 $175,000 

77




Fiber Infrastructure 


Fiber Infrastructure; City and Consortium fiber infrastructure projects. This project is meant to develop fiber optic 

infrastructure in furtherance of the City’s IT needs, and economic development. 

Department: 

Information Technology 



The City has committed to building a city-wide fiber infrastructure for use by the City, and as an economic 

development tool. City Council agreed that the fiber optic infrastructure should be considered on the same level as 

other infrastructure assets here in the City of Delaware. Cities which are currently experiencing growth, typically 

have made significant investment in fiber technology. 


To date, 2008 has seen little change in the fiber optic infrastructure itself, here in the City of Delaware. Legal 

documents for the formation of the Consortium entity, Delaware Area Super Highway (D.A.S.H.) have been drafted. 

However, absent external funding of some kind from DASH members, the infrastructure will not be able to be 

completed. 

In 2009 and beyond, we hope to work closely with the Public Works Department to develop in-house expertise at 

creating fiber-ready infrastructure. That is, we hope to be able to perform all aspects of building fiber infrastructure, 

from burying conduit, installing handholes, and pushing fiber, except for fiber terminations. 


E stim ated 

Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014+ T otals 

N etwork 

R edundancy $0 $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 $175,000 

Total $0 $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 $175,000 


So urce o f Fu nd s 2009 2 010 2011 2012 2 013 2014+ To ta ls 

G e nera l F u nd $ 0 $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 $35,0 00 $3 5,000 $175,000 

O th er C ity F unds $0 

M unicipal B on ds $0 

P rivate Fu nding $0 

S tate/F ederal $0 

O th er G rants $ 0 $0 

T ota l $ 0 $35,000 $35,000 $35,000 $35,0 00 $3 5,000 $175,000 

78




Copier Replacement 


Copier Replacement 

Department: 

IT Department 



With the implementation of the fiber optic network, the new telephone system, and unified messaging, it is paramount 

that we maintain current technology in our copier systems. We now utilize copiers as printers and scanners, as well as 

photocopy machines. IT’s plan for maintaining current technology was primarily implemented in 2007 with the purchase 

of 14 current technology copiers. These copiers permit the City to take advantage of the power of the unified 

messaging systems we have in place by permitting all users in the City to use copiers as scanners, saving files to the 

network, and faxing directly from their PCs. 

By implementing these changes, the City has begun to experience lower operational maintenance cost. 

The funding in this project is to pay the payments on a Capital Lease, which is the method used to make the purchase 

of the copiers in 2007. 



E stim ate d 

E xp e nd itur e s 2 0 09 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 20 1 3 20 1 4 + T ota ls 

P rin te r/C o pie r/S ca n n ers $ 2 0 ,00 0 $ 2 0 ,0 00 $2 0 ,0 00 $ 20 ,0 0 0 $ 20 ,0 0 0 $ 2 0,0 0 0 $1 2 0 ,0 00 

$ 0 

$ 0 

$ 0 

$ 0 

T o ta ls $ 2 0 ,00 0 $ 2 0 ,0 00 $2 0 ,0 00 $ 20 ,0 0 0 $ 20 ,0 0 0 $ 2 0,0 0 0 $1 2 0 ,0 00 


So u rce o f Fu n ds 2009 2010 2011 2012 201 3 2014+ T o tals 

G e neral F und $20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $20,000 $12 0,000 

O ther C ity F unds $ 0 

M unicip al B onds $ 0 

P rivate Fundin g $ 0 

S tate/F ed eral $ 0 

O ther G rants $ 0 

T otal $20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $20,000 $12 0,000 

79




Telephone System Improvements 


Telephone System Improvements 

Department: 

IT Department 



This project represents the payment for the telephone system for which implementation began in 2006, and was 

completed in 2007. 


The City did make additional telephone system investment in 2007 to add additional capacity and redundancy for the 

Police Department. Additional capacity will be added when the telephone system is expanded to include service at the 

new Public Works facility on E. William Street. In conjunction with 911 consolidation, the City will need to invest in the 

replacement of the Police Department’s call logging system. This cost is expected to be about $50,000. 


E s tim a te d 

E x p e nd itur es 2 0 09 20 1 0 20 1 1 2 0 1 2 20 1 3 20 1 4 + T ota ls 

T e le p ho n e S y stem $ 6 0 ,00 0 $ 6 0,0 0 0 $ 60 ,0 0 0 $ 60 ,0 0 0 $ 6 0,0 0 0 $ 6 0,0 0 0 $ 3 6 0,0 0 0 

P .D . C a ll Lo g g er $ 50 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 

$ 0 

$ 0 

$ 0 

T o ta ls $ 6 0 ,00 0 $ 6 0,0 0 0 $ 1 10 ,0 0 0 $ 60 ,0 0 0 $ 6 0,0 0 0 $ 6 0,0 0 0 $ 4 1 0,0 0 0 


So u rc e o f Fu n ds 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014+ T o tals 

G e neral F und $60,0 00 $60,0 00 $ 60,000 $ 60,000 $60,0 00 $60,00 0 $360 ,0 00 

O ther C ity F unds $ 50,000 $ 50,000 

M u nicipal B o nds $0 

P riva te Funding $0 

S tate/F edera l $0 

O ther G ra nts $0 

T otal $60,0 00 $60,0 00 $110 ,000 $ 60,000 $60,0 00 $60,00 0 $410 ,0 00 

80


BUILDING MAINTENANCE 

2009 - 2013 

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 

REVENUES: 

CIP Allocation 51,100 106,300 54,500 25,500 0 

TOTAL REVENUE 51,100 106,300 54,500 25,500 0 

EXPENDITURES: 

Carpet Replacement City Hall 10,000 

City Hall HVAC Replacement 0 60,000 

Justice Center Boiler Replacement 28,000 30,000 

Justice Center HVAC Overhaul 23,100 23,800 24,500 25,200 0 

HVAC Hilborn Room Mingo 12,500 

TOTAL EXPENDITURES 51,100 106,300 54,500 25,200 0 

PURPOSE: To plan for major building maintenance projects. 

FUNDING SOURCES: General fund income tax allocation. 

81



Project: City Hall Carpet Replacement 


City Hall Carpet Replacement – 1 S. Sandusky Street 

Department: 

Public Works – Building Maintenance Division 

Fund: 



City Hall renovation occurred 14 years ago and the carpeting is in need of 

replacement. 2010 funding will replace flooring in Council Chambers 



E s t i m a t e d E x p e nd it ur e s 20 09 20 10 2 01 1 2 01 2 20 13 T o ta ls 

C a rp e t R e p la ce m ent $ 1 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 ,0 0 0 

T o ta ls $ 0 $ 1 0 ,0 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1 0 ,0 0 0 

So ur ce o f F un d s 20 09 20 10 2 01 1 2 01 2 20 13 T o ta ls 

G e n e ra l F u n d $ 1 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 ,0 0 0 

T o ta ls $ 0 $ 1 0 ,0 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1 0 ,0 0 0 

83



Project: Justice Center HVAC Overhaul 


Aging heat pump replacement program for Justice Center – 70 N. Union Street 

Department: 


Fund: 



The Justice Center currently has 43 heat pumps that are 15 years old. The 

average operation expectation for these units is 12-15 years. The proposed 5 

year plan would replace approximately 9 units per year. 




H V A C R e p lac e m en t $ 2 3 ,1 0 0 $ 2 3 ,8 0 0 $ 2 4 ,5 0 0 $ 2 5 ,2 0 0 $ 9 6 ,6 0 0 

T o ta ls $ 2 3 ,1 0 0 $ 2 3 ,8 0 0 $ 2 4 ,5 0 0 $ 2 5 ,2 0 0 $ 9 6 ,6 0 0 


G e n e ra l F u n d $ 2 3 ,1 0 0 $ 2 3 ,8 0 0 $ 2 4 ,5 0 0 $ 2 5 ,2 0 0 $ 9 6 ,6 0 0 

T o ta ls $ 2 3 ,1 0 0 $ 2 3 ,8 0 0 $ 2 4 ,5 0 0 $ 2 5 ,2 0 0 $ 9 6 ,6 0 0 

84



Project: Justice Center Boiler Replacement 


Aging heating system boilers replacement program for Justice Center – 70 N. 

Union Street 

Department: 


Fund: 



The Justice Center currently has 3 boilers that are 16 years old. The average 

operation expectation for these units is 12-15 years. The proposed 5 year plan 

would replace approximately 2 units over the next three years. One boiler was 

replaced during the recent renovations however another unit is inoperable. 




H e a t Sy ste m B oiler $ 2 8 ,0 0 0 $ 0 $ 3 0 ,0 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 5 8 ,0 0 0 

T o ta ls $ 2 8 ,0 0 0 $ 0 $ 3 0 ,0 0 0 $ 0 $ 5 8 ,0 0 0 


G e n e ra l F u n d $ 2 8 ,0 0 0 $ 0 $ 3 0 ,0 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 5 8 ,0 0 0 

T o ta ls $ 2 8 ,0 0 0 $ 0 $ 3 0 ,0 0 0 $ 0 $ 5 8 ,0 0 0 

85



Project: City Hall HVAC Upgrade 


Replacement of Johnson Control HVAC Management System to reduce annual 

City Hall HVAC operating cost 

Department: 


Fund: 



The HVAC system in City Hall HVAC system is 15 years old. The HVAC 

management system is a proprietary system and requires a non-competitive 

parts & professional service arrangement with Johnson Controls to maintain. A 

replacement system will be chosen that is a LonMark certified system to insure 

the HVAC system control components will be open to allow competitive 

purchasing of parts and service. 


RE C OM M E N D E D FU N DIN G 

E s t im a te d E x p e nd it ur es 2 009 2 01 0 2 01 1 2 01 2 2 01 3 T o t a ls 

H V AC M an a ge m e n t Syst e m $ 6 0 ,0 0 0 $ 6 0 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 6 0 ,0 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 6 0 ,0 0 0 

So ur c e o f F un d s 2 009 2 01 0 2 01 1 2 01 2 2 01 3 T o t a ls 

G e ner al F un d $ 6 0 ,0 0 0 $ 6 0 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 6 0 ,0 0 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 6 0 ,0 0 0 

86



Project: AC/Furnace in Hilborn Room 


HVAC replacement in Hilborn Room at Recreation Center. 

Department: 


Fund: 



HVAC replacement program schedule. 




H ilb o rn R m HV A C R e p lace $ 1 2 ,5 0 0 $ 1 2 ,5 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 1 2 ,5 0 0 $ 1 2 ,5 0 0 


G ener al F un d $ 1 2 ,5 0 0 $ 1 2 ,5 0 0 




Sta te /F ed era l 

T ot a ls $ 1 2 ,5 0 0 $ 1 2 ,5 0 0 

87

22 88


PARK IMPACT FEE IMPROVEMENT FUND 

2009-2013 

2009 - 2013 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 


REVENUES: 

Impact Fees 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 85,000 


EXPENDITURES: 

DEBT SERVICE 

Bonds 

Pool Imprvmnts ($450,000 10yrs., 2006 Issue) 55,927 55,927 55,927 55,927 55,322 

2006 Mingo Expansion ($500,000 10yrs.) 62,129 62,129 62,129 62,129 61,462 

Pool Imprvmts ($425,000 notes) 451,942 0 0 0 0 

Skate Park (Net) ($300,000 notes.) 319,018 0 0 0 0 


BIKEWAYS 

Henry St. Trail Enhancements 5,000 20,000 


IMPACT FEE BALANCE 156,968 103,912 70,856 37,800 6,016 

PURPOSE: The Parks Improvement Fund/ Impact Fee Plan identifies future projects intended 

to increase the capacity of the City's community parkland and recreation systems. In 2001 the 

City enacted a parks and recreation facilities development impact fee of $1,226 per new 

residential development unit. All revenue collected from this fee must be used for system 

improvements 

FUNDING SOURCES: Parks and Recreation Development Impact Fees 

89


90



Henry Street Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements 


Safety improvements and enhancements to the existing Springfield Branch 

bike path crossing at Henry Street. Improvements may include pedestrian 

crossing warning signage mounted on a mast-arm, lighting, brick pavers or 

stamped concrete crossing, directional signage (using remnant stone from the 

demolished tunnel), landscape beds, and possibly benches. 

Department: 

Engineering Services and Parks & Recreation 

Fund: 

Park Impact Fee Improvement Fund (Fund 491) 


Improvements are necessary to make the crossing more noticeable and 

attractive. Improvements should make the crossing utilized more often. This 

work was originally part of a final phase of the bike path project that was 

cancelled. 




Fina l E n ginee r ing $ 5 ,0 0 0 $ 5 ,0 0 0 


C o nst ru ct io n $ 2 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 0 ,0 0 0 

C h an ge O rd e r/ C o nt inge n cy $ 0 $ 0 

C o nst ru ct io n En ginee ring 

In s p ec t ion 

T ot a ls $ 5 ,0 0 0 $ 2 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 5 ,0 0 0 


G e ner al F un d $ 0 

O th e r C ity Fu nd s $ 2 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 0 ,0 0 0 

Sta te /F ed e ra l 

In H ou se (E ng in ee rin g) $ 5 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 5 ,0 0 0 $ 2 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 5 ,0 0 0 

91


92


POLICE IMPACT FEE FUND 

2009 - 2013 

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 


REVENUES 

Police Impact Fees 185,000 125,000 100,000 100,000 383,000 

Bond/Note Proceeds 

TOTAL REVENUE 185,000 125,000 100,000 100,000 383,000 

IMPACT FEE EXPENDITURES 

Police Cruiser ( 14th unit) 40,000 

Early Warning System Expansion 25,000 

DEBT SERVICE 

Justice Center ($1,100,000 20yrs.) 88,000 88,000 88,000 88,000 88,000 

TOTAL IMPACT FEE EXPENDITURES 88,000 153,000 88,000 88,000 88,000 


PURPOSE: The Police Improvement Fund identifies future projects and equipment purchases 

necessary for operation of the City's Police Department. In 2001 the City enacted a Police 

Facilities Development Impact Fee of $162 per single family residential unit and approximately 

$350 per 1000 s.f. of non-residential development. These funds must be spent on Police 

equipment and facilities made necessary by the growth of the City. The impact fees cannot be 

spent on replacement of existing equipment or on replacement of equipment purchased with 

impact fee resources. Replacement vehicles for the Police Department are included in the CIP 

replacement fund. 

FUNDING SOURCES: Police Impact Fees 

93


94



Equipment: Early Warning System 


Purchase of complete digital Early Warning Siren unit including pole to add to 

the current system. 

Department: 

Police Department 

Fund: 

Police Impact Fee Fund (Fund 492) 


Previously slated for 2009; pushed back to 2010 based on system capacity. 



E st im a te d E x pe nd it ur e s 2 00 9 20 10 20 11 20 12 2 01 3 T o ta ls 

Sir en $2 5 ,0 0 0 $2 5 ,0 0 0 

T ota ls $2 5 ,0 0 0 $2 5 ,0 0 0 

So u rc e o f F un ds 2 00 9 20 10 20 11 20 12 2 01 3 T o ta ls 

P olice Im pa ct Fee s $2 5 ,0 0 0 $2 5 ,0 0 0 

T ota ls $2 5 ,0 0 0 $2 5 ,0 0 0 

95


96


FIRE IMPACT FEE FUND 

2009 - 2013 

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 


REVENUES: 

Fire Impact Fees 200,000 165,000 140,000 140,000 0 

Bond Issue 

TOTAL REVENUE 200,000 165,000 140,000 140,000 0 

IMPACT FEE EXPENDITURES: 

Command Vehicle 25,000 

Training Vehicle 83,750 

Land Acquisition Area Substation 100,000 100,000 

Construction Station #3 $1,750,000 

Annual Debt Service 20yrs. 140,000 140,000 140,000 

Construction Station #4 $2,000,000 

Annual Debt Service 20yrs. 160,000 

TOTAL IMPACT FEE EXPENDITURES: 100,000 208,750 140,000 140,000 300,000 


PURPOSE: The Fire Improvement Fund identifies future projects and equipment purchases 

necessary for operation of the City's Fire/EMS Department. In 2001 the City enacted a Fire 

Facilities Development Impact Fee of $314 per single family residential unit and approximately 

$350 per 1000 s.f. of non-residential development. These funds must be spent on Fire/EMS 

equipment and facilities made necessary by the growth of the City. The impact fees cannot be 

spent on replacement of existing equipment or on replacement of equipment purchased with 

impact fee resources. 

FUNDING SOURCES: Fire Impact Fees. 

97


98



Project: Fleet Vehicle Replacement 


- Replacement of Existing Fleet Vehicles 

o Vehicle Replacement Schedule 

o Insurance Services Report – October 22, 1998 

o T.G. Fire/EMS Services Inc., 2001 Study 

o Fire Department Strategic Plan – Goals and Critical Service Gaps 

Goal #2 - Improve Facilities to Match Resource to Risk 

Reduce Response Times 

o Fire Department Strategic Plan – Service Gap 

Meet international benchmarks and standard of care 

Upgrade and modernize existing facilities 

Deployment analysis to identify appropriate location of 

facilities to meet the standards of coverage. 

Department: 


Fund: 

General Fund (Fund 101) 



The Fire Department fleet vehicles are aging. In 2007, the Fire Department lost 

a staff vehicle due to mechanical problems, and it has not been replaced. The 

purchase of new fleet vehicles in 2009 and 2010 would include the purchase of 

a command vehicle and a training vehicle through Impact Fees. The 

Department has proposed a plan to develop a rotation based on the 

Department’s Vehicle Replacement Plan. These vehicles would allow the 

Department to be prepared for Fire Department operations. 



E st im a t ed E x pe n dit ur e s 2 00 9 20 10 201 1 2 012 201 3 T o t a ls 

C o m m a nd V ehicle $ 2 5 ,0 0 0 $ 0 $ 2 5 ,0 0 0 

T ra inin g V eh icle $ 8 3 ,7 5 0 $ 8 3 ,7 5 0 

T ot a ls $ 0 $ 1 0 8 ,7 5 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1 0 8 ,7 5 0 


Fire Im p act F ees $ 0 $ 1 0 8 ,7 5 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1 0 8 ,7 5 0 

T ot a ls $ 0 $ 1 0 8 ,7 5 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 1 0 8 ,7 5 0 

99



Project: New Fire Stations 


-Fire Station #303 – new building in the City’s NW quadrant 

• Fire Station located on City owned property on Lexington Blvd 

between W. Central Ave. and W. William St. 

• Decrease response times in the City’s NW quadrant 

• Provide for current and projected growth 

• City currently owns the associated land for new fire station 

• Approximately 10,000 sq ft building 

-Fire Station #304 – new building in the City’s SE quadrant 

• Fire Station is proposed to be located at/in the City water tower 

located on Cheshire Rd. 

• Decrease response times in the City’s SE quadrant 


• City currently owns the associated land for new fire station 

• Build out the interior finish of the water tower 

• Fire Apparatus Bay area attached to the building 

-Fire Station #301 – new building in the City’s East side 

• Fire Station 301 is proposed to be relocated near the 

intersection of E Winter St. and Lake St. 

• Decrease response times in the City’s East side 

• The Fire Station would serve as the main headquarters and 

administrative offices for the Fire Department 

• Ohio Wesleyan University has expressed interest in purchasing 

the property that Fire Station 301 is located 


• Fire Station could serve as the catalyst for redevelopment on the 

East side of the City 

• City currently does not own the associated land for new fire 

station 

-Fire Station construction costs are currently running @ $200/ sq ft. 

-T.G. Fire/EMS Services Inc., 2001 Study 

-Fire Department Strategic Plan – Goals and Critical Service Gaps 

• Goal #2 – Improve Facilities to Match Resource to Risk Reduce 

Response Times 

-Fire Department Strategic Plan – Service Gap 

• Meet international benchmarks and standard of care 

• Upgrade and modernize existing facilities 

• Deployment analysis to identify appropriate location of facilities 

to meet the standards of coverage. 

100

Department: 


Fund: 



-Fire Department is currently responding to 57% of the calls within 4- 

minutes of drive time 

-City Comprehensive Plan states within 4-minutes 90% of the time 

-GIS Studies, indicate that this would increase our response times to 

77% within 4-minutes 

-2007-2012 Fire Department Strategic Plan identified internal and 

external stakeholders as one of the most important issues facing 

the Fire Department. This relates specifically to Goal # 2 




C o nst ru ction St a tio n 3 $ 1 4 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 4 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 4 0 ,0 0 0 $ 4 2 0 ,0 0 0 

C o nst ru ction St a tio n 4 $ 1 6 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 6 0 ,0 0 0 

L a nd A cq . S ub sta t ions $ 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 0 0 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 0 $ 0 $ 1 4 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 4 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 7 8 0 ,0 0 0 


G ener al Fun d $ 0 

Im p ac t F ees/ B o nd s $ 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 4 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 4 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 7 8 0 ,0 0 0 


P riv at e F un d ing (O W U) $ 0 

St a t e/ Fed era l $ 0 

T ot a ls $ 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 4 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 4 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 7 8 0 ,0 0 0 

101


102


MUNICIPAL SERVICES IMPACT FEE FUND 

2009-2013 

2009 - 2013 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 


REVENUES: 

Impact Fees 200,000 150,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 

Bond/Note Proceeds - Justice Center - 

Bond/Note Proceeds - Public Works Garage 


EXPENDITURES: 

DEBT SERVICE 

Public Works Facility ($1,404,000 20yrs.) 103,500 103,500 103,500 103,500 103,500 

Justice Center ($1,200,000 20yrs.) 96,000 96,000 96,000 96,000 96,000 



PURPOSE: The Municipal Services Fund identifies future projects and equipment purchases 

necessary for operation of the City's Various Departments. In 2006 the City enacted a Municipal 

Services Development Impact Fee of $366 per single family residential unit and approximately 

$350 per 1000 s.f. of non-residential development. These funds must be spent on Municipal 

facilities made necessary by the growth of the City. The impact fees cannot be spent on 

replacement of existing equipment or on replacement of equipment purchased with impact fee 

resources. 

FUNDING SOURCES: Municipal Facilities Impact Fees. 

103

104

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 

WATER FUND CAPACITY PROJECTS 

2009-2013 

2009 - 2013 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 

BALANCES FORWARD 1,487,102 2,077,697 2,724,392 2,355,101 2,179,810 

REVENUES: 

Water Capacity Fees 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 

Water Rate Increase 10% 2010 187,500 375,000 382,500 390,000 

Water Rate Increase 10% 2011 187,500 375,000 382,500 

Water Rate Increase 0% 2012 0 0 

JRS Grant 2,000,000 

Bond Proceeds 8,205,000 11,000,000 0 

TOTAL REVENUES 9,205,000 12,187,500 3,562,500 1,757,500 1,772,500 

EXPENDITURES: 

DEBT SERVICE 

Westside Trans. Line ($4,500,000 25 yrs.) 361,520 361,520 361,520 

Kingman Hill Tower ($3,545,000 25 yrs.) 239,405 240,805 242,005 243,005 243,005 

Plant Expansion ($15,230,000 25yrs.) 1,128,266 1,128,266 1,128,266 

TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 239,405 240,805 1,731,791 1,732,791 1,732,791 

PLANT CAPACITY PROJECTS 

Treatment Plant Expansion 

Design 850,000 

Construction 500,000 11,000,000 

WATER SUPPLY PROJETS 

Penry Rd. Wellfield 2,385,000 

DISTRIBUTION CAPACITY PROJECTS 

Westside Transmission Line 4,000,000 

Sawmill Parkway Waterline 100,000 100,000 2,000,000 

Panhandle Rd. Waterline (lowhead dam) 340,000 

New Line Oversizing 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 

TOTAL WATER CAPACITY PROJECTS 8,375,000 11,300,000 2,200,000 200,000 200,000 

ENDING FUND BALANCE 2,077,697 2,724,392 2,355,101 2,179,810 2,019,519 

105

106



Project : Sawmill Parkway Waterline Extension 


Design and construction of a waterline with the Sawmill Parkway Extension. 

Department: 

Public Utilities & Engineering Departments 

Fund: 

Water Capacity Fee Fund (Fund 536) 


Provide potable water service to the SW area of the City with a possible Jobs 

Ready Grant. 




T ra ff ic 



Fina l E n ginee r ing $ 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 


R / W P ur cha s e 


C o nst ru ct io n $ 2 , 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 ,0 0 0 , 0 0 0 

C h an ge O rd e r/ C o nt inge n cy 



T ot a ls $ 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 ,2 0 0 , 0 0 0 



O th e r C ity Fu nd s $ 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 0 0 ,0 0 0 




Job s Re a dy Gr a nt $ 2 , 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 ,0 0 0 , 0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 ,2 0 0 , 0 0 0 

107



Project: Penry Road Raw Water Line 


Construction of the water transmission line from the Penry Wellfield to the 

Water Treatment Plant. The transmission line will double the City’s well water 

supply from the current 2MGD to 4MGD. The additional well water will help in 

lowering nitrates, atrazine, and stage 2 disinfectant by-product levels because 

of the lower levels of organic material in the well water as opposed to the river 

water supply. 

Department: 

Public Utilities Department 

Fund: 

Water Fund Capacity Fee Fund (Fund 536) 


Necessary for additional water treatment capacity. Easements & design work 

are currently under way and construction is needed in order to supply water to 

the new proposed membrane plant pilot study scheduled as part of the Water 

Master Plan. 


E s t im a te d E x p e n d it u r es 2 0 0 9 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 T o ta ls 

T ra ff ic 

E n v ir o n m e n t a l $ 7 5 ,0 0 0 $ 7 5 ,0 0 0 

R / W C on s u lt a n t $ 5 5 ,0 0 0 $ 5 5 ,0 0 0 

R / W P u r c h a s e $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 

A d m in s t ra t iv e 

C o n s t ru c t io n $ 1 ,9 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 ,9 0 0 , 0 0 0 

C h an g e O rd e r/ C o n t in g e n c y 

R E C O M M E N D E D F U N D I N G 

C o n s t ru c t io n En g in e e rin g $ 1 9 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 9 0 ,0 0 0 

In s p e c t io n $ 1 1 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 1 5 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 2 ,3 8 5 , 0 0 0 $ 2 ,3 8 5 , 0 0 0 

S o u r c e o f F u n d s 2 0 0 9 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 T o ta ls 

G e n e r al F u n d 

O th e r C ity F u n d s $ 2 ,3 8 5 , 0 0 0 $ 2 ,3 8 5 , 0 0 0 

M u n ic ip a l B o n d s 

T ot a ls $ 2 ,3 8 5 , 0 0 0 $ 2 ,3 8 5 , 0 0 0 

108


109



Project: Panhandle Road Waterline 


Project involves construction of a 12” water line crossing the river at the 

Panhandle Road low-head dam. 

Department: 


Fund: 

Water Capacity Fee Fund (Fund 536) – Design in 2008 CIP 


Larger water line needed to serve existing customers and additional capacity 

for future development in our service area. Water line construction is in 

conjunction with the removal of the low-head dam. 


Estim a te d Expe nd it ur es 2 00 9 2 010 20 11 20 12 20 13 T o ta ls 

Ad minstra tive 

Co nstru ctio n $3 00,000 $300,000 

Ch an ge O rd er/Co ntingen cy 

Co nstru ctio n En ginee ring $ 25,000 $25,000 

In spection $ 15,000 $15,000 

Tota ls $3 40,000 $340,000 

Sour c e of F un ds 2 00 9 2 010 20 11 20 12 20 13 T o ta ls 

G ener al F un d 

O th er C ity Fu nds $3 40,000 $340,000 

M un icipa l Bon ds 

Priva te F un din g 

Sta te /F edera l 

Tota ls $3 40,000 $340,000 

110



Project: Groundwater Membrane Plant 


The construction of a rated 3MGD Groundwater Membrane Plant which 

will treat the water coming from all the well fields and then blend it with 

the river water being treated by the existing plant. This will increase the 

total water treatment capacity by an additional 3 million gallons per day. 

Department: 


Fund: 



The membrane plant will increase water treatment capacity and help the water 

quality by reducing the Stage II Disinfectant by-products, nitrate and atrazine 

levels and helping to produce a softer and higher quality water able to meet the 

increasing EPA regulations 


Price estimated by engineering firm. 

R E C O M M E N DE D FU N D IN G 

E s t im a te d E x p e nd it ur es 2 00 9 2 010 20 11 20 12 20 13 T o ta ls 

Stu d y $ 5 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 0 ,0 0 0 

E nvir on m ent a l $ 9 0 ,0 0 0 $ 9 0 ,0 0 0 


F ina l E n ginee r ing $ 6 0 5 ,0 0 0 $ 5 5 5 ,0 0 0 

C o nst ru ct io n $ 1 0 ,6 3 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 ,6 3 5 ,0 0 0 


C o nst ru ct io n En ginee ring $ 2 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 5 0 ,0 0 0 

In s p ec t ion $ 1 1 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 1 5 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 1 ,3 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 1 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 2 ,3 0 0 ,0 0 0 



C a p a city F ee s/ B ond s $ 1 ,3 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 1 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 2 ,3 5 0 ,0 0 0 


T ot a ls $ 8 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 1 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 2 ,3 5 0 ,0 0 0 

111



Project: Hills-Miller Road 24-inch Water Line Extension 


Construction of a 13,000 LF extension of the 24-inch distribution main along 

Hills-Miller Road, west of the CSX railway, east and then north along US23 to 

the Water Plant. 

Department: 

Department of Engineering Services & Utility Department 

Fund: 



Project is the final phase of a necessary improvement to the distribution system 

and when complete, provides required redundancy in the system over the 100 

year old 16-inch line parallel to US23. 

Updates/Changes: 

A 400 ft portion of this project from Merrick Blvd. to Hills-Miller Rd was 

constructed in 2005 in conjunction with the TSC development project on the 

west side of US-23. Engineering will continue in early 2008 with R/W for 

approximately 30 properties. Construction of remaining portion of extension 

estimated to begin in 2009. 


RE C O M M E N D E D F U N DI N G 

E st im a te d E x pe n dit ur e s 2 009 20 10 20 11 20 12 2 01 3 T o t a ls 

C o nst ru ct io n $ 4 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 4 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 4 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 4 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 


W a t er Fun d s $ 4 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 4 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 4 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 4 ,0 0 0 ,0 0 0 

112


113



Project: Waterline Oversizing 


Extensions and oversizing of water lines per development agreements 

Department: 


Fund: 



Proper over sizing of waterlines as needed per development agreements 


Estimated Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Totals 

Adminstrative 

Construction $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 

Change Order/Contingency 

Construction Engineering 

Inspection 

RECOMMENDED FUNDING 

Totals $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 

Source of Funds 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Totals 

General Fund 

Other City Funds $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 

Municipal Bonds 

Private Funding 

State/Federal 

Totals $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 

114


WATER FUND MAINTENANCE PROJECTS 

2009 - 2013 

2009 - 2013 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 

BALANCES FORWARD 383,750 506,350 11,026,350 1,656,350 1,796,558 

REVENUES: 

Transfer from Water Fund 677,600 700,000 745,000 790,000 825,000 

Transfer from Water Fund Reserve 800,000 

Add'l Transfer 10% Rate Increase 2012 0 365,000 370,000 

Bond/Note Proceeds 800,000 10,500,000 


EXPENDITURES: 

DEBT SERVICE 

Treatment Plant ($10,500,000 - 25 yrs) 0 839,792 839,792 

WATER TREATMENT PROJECTS 

Treatment Plant Rehabilitation 800,000 10,500,000 

Lagoon Cleaning 450,000 

TREATMENT PLANT SUB-TOTAL 800,000 0 10,500,000 0 450,000 

WATER DISTRIBUTION PROJECTS 

Water Meter Replacement 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 

Water Meter New Installation 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 

Chlorine Booster Tank for SE Highland Tower 


Dump Truck 105,000 

Water Line Improvements 

Small Main/Service Replacement 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 

Fire Flow Improvement 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 

Hillside Dr. Orchard Lane Waterline 140,000 

Blymer St. Waterline 160,000 

Fair Ave. Waterline 115,000 

Eastwood Ave. Waterline Replacement 100,000 

US23 Waterline Replacement 400,000 

ODOT William St. Culvert Waterline Relocation 175,000 

WATER DISTRIBUTION SUB-TOTAL 555,000 680,000 415,000 175,000 335,000 

TOTAL WATER REPAIR AND MAINT. 1,355,000 680,000 10,915,000 1,014,792 1,624,792 

ENDING FUND BALANCE 506,350 11,026,350 1,656,350 1,796,558 1,366,766 

115

116



Project: Water Meter New Installation (New Residential) 


Purchase of water meters for new residential installs. 

Department: 


Fund: 

Water Construction Fund (Fund 531) 


Water meters for new installations. These costs are reimbursed by the builder. 


Estimated Expenditures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 To tals 

R/W Purchase 

Ad minstrative 

Construction $ 25,000 $25 ,000 $25,000 $25,0 00 $25,000 $125,000 

Construction Enginee ring 

Inspection 

RECOMM ENDE D FUNDING 

Totals $ 25,000 $25 ,000 $25,000 $25,0 00 $25,000 $125,000 

Source of Funds 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 To tals 

General Fund 

Other City Funds $ 25,000 $25 ,000 $25,000 $25,0 00 $25,000 $125,000 


Totals $ 20,000 $20 ,000 $20,000 $20,0 00 $20,000 $125,000 

117



Project: US 23 Waterline Replacement 


Construction of an 8” water line on Route US-23 North. 

Department: 


Fund: 



Water line to fill in gaps of water service along Rt. 23 N to allow taking the old 

16” water transmission main out of service. Existing 16” water main has been 

in continuous service since 1889 and its useful life has been surpassed. 

Repairs to this 16 inch main are costly, difficult, and temporarily impairs the 

Water Plant capability to provide the necessary flow rates required. 

Improvements for this project are defined in the 1986 Water System Master 

Plan study. 



Estim ated Expend it ur es 2 00 9 2 010 20 11 20 12 20 13 T o tals 

Prelimin ary En gineer ing 

Final En gineer ing $45 ,000 $45,000 

R/W Pur chase 


Co nstru ctio n $355 ,000 $355,000 

Co nstru ctio n En ginee ring 

In spection 

Totals $400 ,000 $400,000 

Sour ce of F un ds 2 00 9 2 010 20 11 20 12 20 13 T o tals 

Gener al F un d 

Oth er C ity Fu nds $400 ,000 $400,000 

Mun icipal Bon ds 

State /F ederal 

Totals $400 ,000 $400,000 

118



Project: Treatment Plant Rehabilitation 


Rehabilitation of existing water treatment plant. This project is part of the new 

Water Master Plan to help extent the life of the existing water plant. 

Department: 


Fund: 



Program is needed to increase life of existing plant. The water plant was built 

in 1930’s and has been upgraded several times. A recent condition assessment 

showed that the current facilities are not suited for expansion or upgrade. The 

original concrete structures will require partial repair / reconstruction due to 

age, several unit processes do not meet current EPA design standards, building 

code violations have been identified, and the current plant is located within the 

Olentangy River flood plain. 


Est im a te d Expe nd it ur e s 200 9 201 0 2 01 1 2 01 2 2 01 3 T ot a ls 

Tra ff ic 

E nv ir on m enta l $120,000 $12 0,000 

Prelim in a ry E n gine ering $210,000 $21 0,000 

Fina l E n gineer ing $470,000 $47 0,000 

Co nstru ction $10,160 ,000 $ 10,160, 000 

Ch an ge O r der/ Co nting ency 

RE CO M M E ND ED F UND ING 

Co nstru ction E ngin eering $ 225,000 $22 5,000 

In spection $ 115,000 $11 5,000 

Tota ls $800,000 $10,500 ,000 $ 11,300, 000 

Sou rc e of F un ds 200 9 201 0 2 01 1 2 01 2 2 01 3 T ot a ls 


O th er City Fu nds $800,000 $10,500 ,000 $ 11,300, 000 

M un icipa l Bon ds 

Tota ls $800,000 $10,500 ,000 $ 11,300, 000 

119



Project: Small Main Replacement 


Replacement of small (4 inch and less) water mains that have been prone to 

failures, represent water quality issues. 

Department: 


Fund: 



Will improve reliability of the water system, reduce water loss, and improve 

water quality issues in the water distribution system. This is a 1986 Water 

System Master Plan recommendation. 


Estimated Expend itures 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 To tals 


Construction $ 50,000 $50 ,000 $50,000 $50,0 00 $50,000 $250,000 

Change Ord er/Contingency 


Inspection 

RECOMM ENDE D FUN DIN G 

Totals $ 50,000 $50 ,000 $50,000 $50,0 00 $50,000 $250,000 


General F und 

Other C ity Funds $ 50,000 $50 ,000 $50,000 $50,0 00 $50,000 $250,000 


Totals $ 50,000 $50 ,000 $50,000 $50,0 00 $50,000 $250,000 

120



Project : ODOT Culvert Waterline Relocation Project 


Relocation of the water main at William St. & Liberty St. prior to the ODOT 

Culvert replacement. 

Department: 

Engineering & Public Utilities Departments 

Fund: 



Water main is in conflict with the ODOT culvert project and must be relocated. 




T ra ff ic 


P re lim in a ry E n gine er ing 





C o nst ru ct io n $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 




T ot a ls $ 1 7 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 7 5 ,0 0 0 







T ot a ls $ 1 7 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 7 5 ,0 0 0 

121



Project: Lime Lagoon Cleaning 


Removal of lime sludge from lagoons at the Water Treatment Plant. The lagoons 

temporarily store the lime sludge, but when they reach its holding capacity 

they must be cleaned. 

Department: 


Fund: 



Sludge lagoons will have reached their holding capacity. 




Construction $450,000 $450,000 



Inspection 

Totals $450,000 $450,000 


General F und 

Other C ity Funds $450,000 $450,000 


Private F unding 


Totals $450,000 $450,000 

122



Project: Hillside Dr / Orchard Lane Waterline 


Replacement of the existing 2” water line on a section of Hillside Drive with an 

8” water main. No water main exists on Orchard Lane. 

Department: 


Fund: 



Fire flow capacity improvement and water quality issue resolution. Refer to 

recommendations established by the 1986 Water System Master Plan. 


E s t im a t e d E xp e n d it u re s 2 0 0 9 2 0 10 2 0 11 2 0 12 2 0 13 T o t a ls 

A d m in s tra tiv e 

C o n s truc tio n $ 140 ,00 0 $ 140 ,00 0 

C h a ng e O rde r/C o n ting e nc y 

C o n s truc tio n E n gin e e ring 

Ins p e c tio n 


T o ta ls $ 140 ,00 0 $ 140 ,00 0 

S o u rc e o f F u n d s 2 0 0 9 2 0 10 2 0 11 2 0 12 2 0 13 T o t a ls 

G e n e ra l F u n d 

O th e r C ity F u n ds $ 140 ,00 0 $ 140 ,00 0 

M u nic ip a l B o n d s 

S ta te /F e d e ra l 

T o ta ls $ 140 ,00 0 $ 140 ,00 0 

123



Project: Fire Flow Improvements 


Improvement of fire flow capacity for existing water mains. 

Department: 


Fund: 



Funds to help increase size of water lines for fire flow capacity purposes. This 

is a 1986 Water System Master Plan recommendation. 



Adminstrative 

Construction $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $375,000 



Inspection 


Totals $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $375,000 


General Fund 

Other City Funds $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $375,000 


State/Federal 

Totals $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $375,000 

124



Project: Fair Ave. & East St. Waterlines 


Replacement of existing water small main to improve fire flow capability. No 

water main exists on East Street. 

Department: 


Fund: 



Improves fire flow capabilities, and upgrades service line connections. Refer to 

recommendation established by the 1986 Water System Master Plan study. 


Estim ated Expend it ur es 2 00 9 2 010 20 11 20 12 20 13 To tals 

Prelimin ary En gineer ing 

Final En gineer ing 


Co nstru ctio n $1 15,000 $115,000 


In spection 


Totals $1 15,000 $115,000 

Sour ce of F un ds 2 00 9 2 010 20 11 20 12 20 13 To tals 


Oth er C ity Fu nds $1 15,000 $115,000 



Totals $1 15,000 $115,000 

125



Project: Eastwood Ave. Waterline 


Replacement of an existing aged 6” water main with a history of both main and 

service line failure, with a new 8” ductile iron main, new service lines and 

meter pit connections. 

Department: 


Fund: 



Eliminates frequent repairs to this water main that is prone to failure and 

improves fire flow capacity. 


Estim ated Expend it ur es 2 00 9 2 010 20 11 20 12 20 13 To tals 

Final En gineer ing 


Co nstru ctio n $100, 000 $100,000 


Co nstru ctio n En ginee ring 

In spection 


Totals $100, 000 $100,000 

Sour ce of F un ds 2 00 9 2 010 20 11 20 12 20 13 To tals 


Oth er C ity Fu nds $100, 000 $100,000 



Totals $100, 000 $100,000 

126



Project: Dump Truck 


Purchase of a Water Distribution Tandem Axle Dump Truck 

Department: 


Fund: 



Replacement of the existing 2 ton dump truck that has exceeded its useful life 

and is prone to repairs. 



Adminstrative 

Construction 



Inspection 


Totals $105,000 $105,000 


General Fund 

Other City Funds $105,000 $105,000 


Private Funding 

State/Federal 

Totals $105,000 $105,000 

127



Project: Blymer St Water Main 


Construction of an 8” water main on Blymer St. from E. Lincoln Ave. to 

Fountain Ave. then west on Fountain to N. Union St. 

Department: 


Fund: 



Improvement of fire flow capacity with the replacement of the existing 4” 

waterline. Project defined in the 1986 Water System Master Plan. 




Final Engineering 


Construction $160,000 $160,000 



Inspection 

Totals $160,000 $160,000 


General F und 

Other C ity Funds $160,000 $160,000 



Totals $160,000 $160,000 

128



Project: Backhoe 


Replacement of the Water Distribution existing “front line” backhoe that has 

reached the end of its current functional life cycle. A reliable properly 

configured backhoe is an indispensable piece of equipment for the water 

distribution daily system maintenance function. 

Department: 


Fund: 



The existing “front line” back hoe will be retained to replace the existing 

“backup” backhoe. The “backup” unit serves to replace the “front line” unit as 

needed and as the aggregate loader at the stockpile location. The “backup” unit 

has long since been incapable of serving as a replacement for the “front line” 

unit, and has been prone to many failures. 


R ECOMM ENDE D FUN DIN G 

Estim ated Expend itures 2 00 9 2 010 20 11 20 12 20 13 To tals 


Construction 

Ch an ge Ord er/Contingen cy 

Construction En ginee ring 

In spection 

Totals $ 90,000 $90,000 

Source of Funds 2 00 9 2 010 20 11 20 12 20 13 To tals 


Oth er C ity Funds $ 90,000 $90,000 


Totals $ 90,000 $90,000 

129



Project: Water Meter Replacement 


Replacement of aged inaccurate water meters. Some of these meter 

installations are also not remoted. 

Department: 


Fund: 



Water fund and Waste Water fund share this cost. Inaccurate meters and nonremoted 

meters represent income stream and operational inefficiencies. These 

meter conditions are being improved on a continuous basis (there are 11,000+ 

meters of various size in the system) for the benefit of both Utilities (Water & 

Sewer) hence the funding from both. 




Construction $ 25,000 $25 ,000 $25,000 $25,0 00 $25,000 $125,000 



Inspection 

Totals $ 25,000 $25 ,000 $25,000 $25,0 00 $25,000 $125,000 


General F und 

Other C ity Funds $ 25,000 $25 ,000 $25,000 $25,0 00 $25,000 $125,000 


Private F unding 


Totals $ 25,000 $25 ,000 $25,000 $25,0 00 $25,000 $125,000 

130


SEWER FUND CAPACITY PROJECTS 

2009 - 2013 

2009 - 2013 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 

BALANCES FORWARD 500,000 227,264 (70,007) (190,672) (272,854) 

REVENUES: 

Sewer Capacity Fees 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 1,100,000 

SE Highland Sewer ERU Fees 68,250 71,663 75,246 78,000 78,000 

Sewer Fees Transfer - 15% 2007 619,000 631,380 644,000 656,890 670,025 



JRS Grant 3,000,000 

Bond Proceeds - SE Highland Sewer 


EXPENDITURES: 

DEBT SERVICE 

Land Armstrong Rd./23 N. Sewer $4,715,000 20yrs. 350,815 349,315 352,140 349,293 349,293 

230 North Sewer 67,132 66,132 70,132 68,932 68,932 

SE Highland Sewer $15,000,000, 5.5%, 25 yrs. 1,036,988 1,045,000 1,051,988 1,051,988 

SE Highland Sewer $2,800,000, 20 yrs. OWDA 204,879 204,879 204,879 204,879 204,879 

Plant Expansion $21,262,000, 20 yrs. OWDA 1,555,760 1,555,760 1,555,760 1,555,760 1,555,760 

TOTAL DEBT SERVICE 2,178,586 3,213,074 3,227,911 3,230,852 3,230,852 

COLLECTION CAPACITY PROJECTS 

Professional Services 

US23/US42 30" Sewer Belle Ave. to Cherry St. 490,000 

Sawmill Parkway Sewer Extension 150,000 150,000 3,000,000 

Columbus Pike Sanitary Sewer 100,000 

East St. Sewer 150,000 

TOTAL SEWER CAPACITY PROJECTS 890,000 150,000 3,000,000 0 0 

ENDING FUND BALANCE 227,264 (70,007) (190,672) (272,854) (315,631) 

131

132



Project: Columbus Pike Sanitary Sewer 


The project extends a sanitary sewer along Columbus Pike just north of 

Cheshire Road. Currently, the existing homes on septic systems and the 

residents have requested the City extend sanitary sewer service to the area. 

Department: 


Fund: 

Wastewater Capacity Fee Fund (Fund 546) 


This project eliminates the septic systems and provides sanitary sewer service 

in the area. The residents would be required to pay a front footage fee and 

applicable capacity fees. 



E st im a te d 

E xp e n d it u res 2 0 0 9 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 T o t a ls 

C o n s tru ct io n $ 10 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0,0 0 0 

T o ta ls $ 10 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0,0 0 0 

S o u rc e o f F u n ds 2 0 0 9 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 T o t a ls 

O t h e r C it y F u n d s $ 10 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0,0 0 0 

T o ta ls $ 10 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0,0 0 0 

133



Project : Sawmill Parkway Sanitary Sewer Extension 


Design and construction of a sanitary sewer main as a part of the Sawmill 

Parkway project. 

Department: 

Public Utilities & Engineering Departments 

Fund: 



Project will provide sanitary sewer services to the SW area of the City with the 

Sawmill Parkway extension. Part of the City’s Jobs Ready Grant application. 



T ra ff ic 



Fina l E n ginee r ing $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 




C o nst ru ct io n $ 3 , 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 ,0 0 0 , 0 0 0 





T ot a ls $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 ,3 0 0 , 0 0 0 







Job s Re a dy Gr a nt $ 3 , 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 ,0 0 0 , 0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 , 0 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 ,3 0 0 , 0 0 0 

134



Project: US23/RT 42 30-inch Belle Ave/Cherry St Sanitary Sewer 


Construction of the 30-inch sewer at Belle Ave under US23/RT42 to tie into the 

42-inch sewer on Stratford Rd to Cherry St. to provide additional sewer 

capacity to the SW area of the City. 

Department: 

Public Utilities & Engineering Department 

Fund: 

Wastewater Capacity fee fund (Fund 546) 


Project currently in the design phase, field investigations of the Stratford 

Rd/Cherry St sewer revealed the sewer is deteriorated due to H2S from the 

force main. This project is the first phase of improvements for the Industrial 

Park area as recommended in the 2007 report. 




T ra ff ic 



Fina l E n ginee r ing 




C o nst ru ct io n $ 4 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 4 5 0 ,0 0 0 


C o nst ru ct io n En ginee ring $ 2 5 ,0 0 0 $ 2 5 ,0 0 0 

In s p ec t ion $ 1 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 4 9 0 ,0 0 0 $ 4 9 0 ,0 0 0 







T ot a ls $ 4 9 0 ,0 0 0 $ 4 9 0 ,0 0 0 

135



Project: East Street Sewer 


The project extends a sanitary sewer along East Street. Currently, existing 

homes along East Street use long laterals that connect to existing sewer on 

adjacent streets. In addition, there are buildable lots along East Street that do 

not have access to sanitary sewer. 

Department: 


Fund: 



This project eliminates the existing long laterals and provides sanitary sewer 

service to the area. In addition, long laterals are potentially a high infiltration 

source. 




E x pe n dit ur e s 2 00 9 20 10 201 1 2 012 201 3 T o t al s 

C o nst ru ct io n $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 

So ur ce o f Fu nd s 2 00 9 20 10 201 1 2 012 201 3 T o t al s 


T ot a ls $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 

136


SEWER FUND MAINTENANCE PROJECTS 

2009 - 2013 

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 

BALANCES FORWARD 1,000,000 1,496,008 1,732,016 2,497,017 1,853,458 

REVENUES: 

Transfer from Sewer Fund 1,349,837 1,349,837 1,403,830 1,425,000 1,425,000 


EXPENDITURES: 

DEBT SERVICE 

Current Debt Service 357,120 357,120 357,120 357,120 357,120 

Plant Rehabilitation ($1,800,000 20 yrs. 3.52%) 131,709 131,709 131,709 131,709 131,709 


WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROJECTS 

Sludge Transport Truck 125,000 

Tertiary Filter Building Equipment 500,000 

Disinfection 50,000 55,000 

WASTEWATER COLLECTION PROJECTS 

Inflow/Infiltration Remediation 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 

Toledo Street Sewer Rehab 80,000 

Columbus Avenue Sewer Rehab 115,000 

Weselyan Woods 150,000 

William & Liberty Sewer Relocation 220,000 

Wastewater Service Area Facilities Plan 50,000 

Sewer Camera Truck Equipment 20,000 

Sewer Jet Truck 300,000 

Sewer Cleaning Unit 180,000 


TOTAL SEWER REPAIR/MAINTENANCE 365,000 625,000 150,000 605,000 690,000 

ENDING FUND BALANCE 1,496,008 1,732,016 2,497,017 2,828,188 2,099,629 

137

138 34



Project: Toledo Street Sewer Rehabilitation 


The sanitary sewer is broken down in several areas and is a significant source 

of infiltration/inflow. The repairs consist of spot repairs, sewer lining, sewer 

grouting and lining of the manholes. 

Department: 


Fund: 

Wastewater Construction Fund (Fund 541) 


A CCTV inspection in February 2008 revealed numerous deficiencies allowing 

heavy infiltration to enter the sanitary sewer main. These flows decrease 

capacity of the WWTP and cause OEPA permit violations. 





C o nst ru ct io n $ 8 0 ,0 0 0 $ 8 0 , 0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 8 0 ,0 0 0 $ 8 0 , 0 0 0 


O th er C ity Fu nd s $ 8 0 ,0 0 0 $ 8 0 , 0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 8 0 ,0 0 0 $ 8 0 , 0 0 0 

139



Project: Sewer Jet Truck 


These funds would be used to replace the existing 1999 combination sewer 

cleaning truck. This unit is used to perform preventive maintenance and 

remove blockages from the collection systems. 

Department: 


Fund: 



The current primary unit (1999 unit) has past its effective life cycle and needs 

replaced. 



T ra ff ic 







O th e r $ 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 





T ot a ls $ 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 







T ot a ls $ 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 

140


2009-2013 Capital Improvement Fund 

Project: Sewer Camera Truck Equipment 


These funds would be used to replace the existing computer, video capturing 

system, and software in the collection systems CCTV sewer inspection unit. 

Department: 

Public Utilities – Sewer Fund - Maintenance 

Fund: 



These updates would allow for easier access to the inspection video and would 

integrate with our CMMS. 





C o n s tru ct io n $2 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 0, 00 0 

T o ta ls $2 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 0, 00 0 


O t h e r C it y F u n d s $2 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 0, 00 0 

T o ta ls $2 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 0, 00 0 

141



Project: Inflow/Infiltration Remediation 


The project consists of securing professional services to locate, identify, and 

repair various sources of infiltration and inflow found in the sanitary sewer 

system. Infiltration and inflow cause’s sanitary sewer backups into homes and 

increases flow to the WWTP. These flows decrease capacity of the WWTP and 

cause OEPA permit violations. This program has been in effect for the past 4 

years and has made significant reductions in local infiltration and inflow 

problems. (grouting, sliplining) 

Department: 

Public Utilities – Sewer Fund – Maintenance 

Fund: 



The City’s CCTV inspection program has identified numerous areas of 

infiltration located within the City’s collection system. These areas include 

Sunbury Road (405’), William Street (245’), Central Avenue (769’), Smith Street 

(214’), Chamberlain Street (245’), Parson Avenue (184’), Winter Street (2521’), 

Milo Street (340’) any many others. 





I & I $ 10 0 ,0 0 0 $1 0 0 ,0 00 $ 10 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0 ,00 0 $ 5 0 0,0 0 0 

T o ta ls $ 10 0 ,0 0 0 $1 0 0 ,0 00 $ 10 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0 ,00 0 $ 5 0 0,0 0 0 


O t h e r C it y F u n d s $ 10 0 ,0 0 0 $1 0 0 ,0 00 $ 10 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0 ,00 0 $ 5 0 0,0 0 0 

T o ta ls $ 10 0 ,0 0 0 $1 0 0 ,0 00 $ 10 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0 ,00 0 $ 5 0 0,0 0 0 

142


The impact of inflow and infiltration on our network is represented in the following diagram. 

Dry weather flows - low inflow / infiltration 

Wet weather flows - high inflow / infiltration 

Off peak network load Peak network load Off peak network load Peak network load 

Wastewater pipes are underground and invisible. Most people do not consider that these pipes need maintenance 

like the rest of their property. Infiltration is an unseen problem and does not usually alert property owners that 

something may be wrong with their wastewater pipes. 

143



Project: Combination Sewer Cleaning Unit 


These funds would be used to replace the existing 1988 combination sewer 

cleaning truck with a combination sewer cleaning unit. This new smaller unit 

would service as the secondary unit to the existing 1999 combination sewer 

cleaning truck (replacement 2012). These units are used to perform preventive 

maintenance and remove blockages from the collection systems. 

Department: 


Fund: 



The current secondary unit (1988 unit) has past its effective life cycle and is 

prone to failures and inefficiencies. 



T ra ff ic 







O th e r $ 1 8 0 ,0 0 0 





T ot a ls $ 1 8 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 8 0 ,0 0 0 







T ot a ls $ 1 8 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 8 0 ,0 0 0 

144



Project: Columbus Avenue Sewer Rehabilitation 


The sanitary sewer is broken down in several areas and is a significant source 

of infiltration/inflow. The repairs consist of spot repairs, sewer lining, sewer 

grouting and lining of the manholes. 

Department: 


Fund: 



A CCTV inspection in March 2008 revealed numerous deficiencies allowing 

heavy infiltration to enter the sanitary sewer main. These flows decrease 

capacity of the WWTP and cause OEPA permit violations. 


R E C O M M E N D E D F U N D I N G 

E s t im a t ed 

E x p e n d i tu re s 2 0 0 9 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 T o ta l s 

C o n s t ru c t io n $ 1 1 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 1 5 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 1 1 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 1 5 ,0 0 0 

S o u r ce o f F u n d s 2 0 0 9 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 T o ta l s 

O th e r C ity F u n d s $ 1 1 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 1 5 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 1 1 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 1 5 ,0 0 0 

145



Project: Backhoe 


These funds would be used to replace the 2004 Case 590 Backhoe. 

Department: 


Fund: 



The existing unit has reached its functional life cycle and will need to be 

replaced. 





C o n s tru ct io n $ 9 0 ,0 00 $ 9 0, 00 0 

T o ta ls $ 9 0 ,0 00 $ 9 0, 00 0 


O t h e r C it y F u n d s $ 9 0 ,0 00 $ 9 0, 00 0 

T o ta ls $ 9 0 ,0 00 $ 9 0, 00 0 

146



Project : UV Disinfection Equipment 


Replacement of existing UV ballasts and lamps for the UV disinfection 

equipment. 

Department: 





Replacement of the high intensity lamps that are at the end their recommended 

life cycle for meeting the City’s NPDES permit requirements. 



T ra ff ic 







C o nst ru ct io n 


O th e r $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 5 ,0 0 0 



T ot a ls $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 5 ,0 0 0 



O th e r C ity Fu nd s $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 5 ,0 0 0 




T ot a ls $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 5 ,0 0 0 

147



Project: Tertiary Filter Building Equipment 

Description and Purpose: Replacement of existing filter media and pumps to 

continue to meet more stringent NPDES requirements. 

Department: Public Utilities 

Fund and Account: Wastewater Construction Fund (Fund 541) 

Justification: Existing filter media will be at the end of its recommended life 

cycle and will have to be replaced to ensure the City will be able to meet its 

NPDES requirements. 



T ra ff ic 







C o nst ru ct io n $ 4 5 0 ,0 0 0 $ 4 5 0 ,0 0 0 




T ot a ls $ 5 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 0 ,0 0 0 







T ot a ls $ 5 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 0 ,0 0 0 

148



Project : Sludge Transport Truck 


Purchase of a new quad axle roll-off hoist truck to transport WWTP sludge from 

plant to the landfill. 

Department: 


Fund: 



Replace the existing 1995 sludge truck that currently has 515,000 miles. 

Existing truck has been prone to costly repairs and we have to use a private 

hauler when the truck is down for repairs. 





O th er $ 1 2 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 2 5 ,0 0 0 


In sp ection 


T ot a ls $ 1 2 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 2 5 ,0 0 0 


G ener al F un d 




Sta te /F ed era l 

T ot a ls $ 1 2 5 ,0 0 0 $ 1 2 5 ,0 0 0 

149



Project : Facilities Planning Report 


Facilities planning document for updating the wastewater service area of the 

City. 

Department: 


Fund: 



Need to update the 2000 wastewater service area document. 




T ra ff ic 



Fina l E n ginee r ing $ 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 








T ot a ls $ 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 



O th e r C ity Fu nd s $ 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 




T ot a ls $ 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 0 0 

150



Project: Wesleyan Woods Sanitary Sewer 


Several sources of infiltration/inflow and severe root intrusion into the sanitary 

sewer have been located in the Wesleyan Woods area. The project consists of 

trenchless methods of infiltration/inflow removal and some limited spot 

repairs. 

Department: 


Fund: 



Infiltration and inflow cause’s sanitary sewer backups into homes and 

increases flow to the WWTP. These flows decrease capacity of the WWTP and 

cause OEPA permit violations. 





C o nst ru ct io n $ 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 


O th er C ity Fu nd s $ 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 1 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 1 5 0 ,0 0 0 

151

152


STORM SEWER FUND 

2009 - 2013 

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 


REVENUES: 

Storm Sewer Fees 515,000 525,000 540,000 550,000 570,000 

TOTAL REVENUE 515,000 525,000 540,000 550,000 570,000 

EXPENDITURES: 

Catch Basin Replacement 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 

Miscellaneous Repair 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 

Inflow/Infiltration Remediation 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 

N. Sandusky St. to N. Liberty St. 380,000 

East Winter Street (Lake St. to Wade St.) 220,000 

Bernard Avenue (US 23 to Liberty St.) 75,000 

Cherry St. Stormwater Replacement 200,000 

Vernon Ave. 535,000 

W. William St/Liberty Culvert Replacement 300,000 

I & I Report 0 100,000 

NPDES Costs 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 


UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE 408,500 473,500 243,500 253,500 363,500 

PURPOSE: The Storm Sewer CIP identifies future projects and studies necessary for 

improving and maintaining the City's storm sewer system. The City will begin a master plan 

process in 2006 to identify issues related to compliance with recently adopted storm sewer 

regulations. 

FUNDING SOURCES: Storm sewer projects are funded primarily by the previously enacted 

storm sewer fees. These fees are assessed to all single and two family residential units 

at the rate of $2.50 per month. Non-residential and apartments are assesssed a fee based on 

an impervious surface calaculation performed on their property. 

153

154 12



Project: Public Works Storm Water Replacement 


This project replaces the existing storm water system that is currently located 

within the closed landfill located at 241 Cherry Street. The proposed storm 

water system would be located and the pipe joints would be water tight. 

Department: 


Fund: 

Storm Sewer Fund (Fund 203) 


The City received a Notice of Violation for the discharge of pollutants to “water 

of the state” without an NPDES permit. The pollutant is the leachate from the 

closed landfill that enters the storm water pipe through the pipe joints. 





C o n s tru ct io n $ 20 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 0 0,0 0 0 

T o ta ls $ 20 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 0 0,0 0 0 


O t h e r C it y F u n d s $ 20 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 0 0,0 0 0 

T o ta ls $ 20 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 0 0,0 0 0 

155



Project: Storm Sewers from N. Sandusky to N. Liberty St. 


Improvements of existing storm sewers and installations of new storm sewers 

and catch basins from N. Sandusky St. to N. Liberty St 

Department: 


Fund: 



The 1990 Storm Water Report update recommended this project (B-1) to 

improve the storm water drainage from N. Sandusky St. to N. Liberty St and 

reduction in known I&I. 




C o nst ru ct io n $ 3 8 0 , 0 0 0 $ 3 8 0 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 3 8 0 , 0 0 0 $ 3 8 0 ,0 0 0 


O th e r C ity Fu nd s $ 3 8 0 , 0 0 0 $ 3 8 0 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 3 8 0 , 0 0 0 $ 3 8 0 ,0 0 0 

156



Project: Storm Sewers Miscellaneous Repairs 


Fees for miscellaneous repairs to the City’s Storm sewer system. 

Department: 


Fund: 



Costs to provide repairs to the City’s storm sewer system as needed to maintain 

the system. 


R E C O M M EN D E D F U N D I N G 


E xp e n d it u re s 2 0 0 9 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 T o tal s 

M is c ell an e o u s Re p airs $ 3 0,0 0 0 $ 30 ,0 0 0 $ 3 0 ,00 0 $ 3 0 ,0 00 $3 0 ,0 0 0 $1 7 9 ,0 00 

T o ta ls $ 3 0,0 0 0 $ 30 ,0 0 0 $ 3 0 ,00 0 $ 3 0 ,0 00 $3 0 ,0 0 0 $1 7 9 ,0 00 

S o u rc e o f F u n ds 2 0 0 9 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 T o tal s 

O t h e r C it y F u n d s $ 3 0,0 0 0 $ 30 ,0 0 0 $ 3 0 ,00 0 $ 3 0 ,0 00 $3 0 ,0 0 0 $1 7 9 ,0 00 

T o ta ls $ 3 0,0 0 0 $ 30 ,0 0 0 $ 3 0 ,00 0 $ 3 0 ,0 00 $3 0 ,0 0 0 $1 7 9 ,0 00 

157



Project: East Winter Street Storm Sewer Improvements 


Storm sewer improvements on East Winter St. from Lake St. to Wade St 

Department: 


Fund: 



The 1990 Storm Water Report update recommended this project (O-2) to 

improve the storm water drainage on East Winter St. from Lake St. to Wade St 

and reduction in known I&I. 





C o nst ru ct io n $ 2 2 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 2 0 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 2 2 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 2 0 ,0 0 0 



T ot a ls $ 2 2 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 2 0 ,0 0 0 

158



Project : I&I Report of the Storm Sewer System 


Comprehensive I&I report of the City’s storm sewer system. Includes flow 

monitoring, smoke & dye testing and modeling to locate sources of I&I within 

the City. 

Department: 


Fund: 



Need to locate sources of I&I in the City to help reduce amount of storm water 

at the UOWRC. This report is recommended in the 2000 wastewater report. 




Fina l E n ginee r ing $ 2 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 









T ot a ls $ 2 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 







T ot a ls $ 2 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 

159




Project: Catch Basin Replacement 

Fees for replacement of catch basins within the City’s storm water system. A 

catch basin (a.k.a., storm drain inlet, curb inlet) is an inlet to the storm drain 

system that typically includes a grate or curb inlet where stormwater enters the 

catch basin and a sump to capture sediment, debris and associated pollutants. 

Catch basins act as pretreatment for other treatment practices by capturing 

large sediments. The performance of catch basins at removing sediment and 

other pollutants depends on the design of the catch basin (e.g., the size of the 

sump), and routine maintenance to retain the storage available in the sump to 

capture sediment. 

Department: 


Fund: 



Replacement of inoperable catch basins. 


R E C O M M EN D E D F U N D I N G 

E st im a te d E xp e n d it u res 2 0 0 9 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 T ot a ls 

C at ch B as i n Re p la c e m e n t $ 10 ,0 0 0 $ 10 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0,0 0 0 $ 1 0 ,0 00 $1 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 00 

T o ta ls $ 10 ,0 0 0 $ 10 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0,0 0 0 $ 1 0 ,0 00 $1 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 00 

S o u rc e o f F u n ds 2 0 0 9 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 2 2 0 1 3 T ot a ls 

O t h e r C it y F u n d s $ 10 ,0 0 0 $ 10 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0,0 0 0 $ 1 0 ,0 00 $1 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 00 

T o ta ls $ 10 ,0 0 0 $ 10 ,0 0 0 $ 1 0,0 0 0 $ 1 0 ,0 00 $1 0 ,0 0 0 $ 5 0 ,0 00 

160



Project: Bernard Ave. Storm Sewer 


Improvements to the storm sewer on Bernard Ave. from US 23 to Liberty Street 

Department: 


Fund: 



The 1990 Storm Water Report update recommended this project (F-3) to 

improve the storm water drainage along Bernard Ave. from US 23 to Liberty 

Street. 




E x p e n d it ur e s 2 00 9 20 10 201 1 2 012 201 3 T o t al s 

C o nst ru ct io n $ 7 5 ,0 0 0 $ 7 5 , 0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 7 5 ,0 0 0 $ 7 5 , 0 0 0 


O th e r C ity F u nd s $ 7 5 ,0 0 0 $ 7 5 , 0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 7 5 ,0 0 0 $ 7 5 , 0 0 0 

161



Project : Fees for MS4 Storm Water Management Plan 


Fees for MS4 storm water management plan as required in the OEPA storm 

water NPDES permit. 

Department: 


Fund: 



Provide resources for storm water NPDES permit attainment. 



T ra ff ic 



Fina l E n ginee r ing $ 2 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 0 ,0 0 0 $ 8 0 ,0 0 0 









T ot a ls $ 2 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 0 ,0 0 0 $ 8 0 ,0 0 0 



O th e r C ity Fu nd s $ 2 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 0 ,0 0 0 $ 8 0 ,0 0 0 




T ot a ls $ 2 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 0 ,0 0 0 $ 2 0 , 0 0 0 $ 2 0 ,0 0 0 $ 8 0 ,0 0 0 

162



Project: West William Street/Liberty Street Culvert Replacement 


This project is initiated and administered by ODOT District 6 and involves the 

open cut replacement of the failing Delaware Run pipe arch culvert within the 

William Street & Liberty Street right of way. 

Department: 

Department of Engineering Services & Public Utilities Department 

Fund: 



Per agreement with ODOT and includes the necessary storm sewer 

improvement in keeping with storm sewer master plan. 


The city is responsible for project construction costs within the Liberty Street 

R/W. The current cost estimate below is provided by ODOT. 




C o nst ru ct io n $ 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 


Stor m S ewe r Fu nd $ 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 $ 3 0 0 ,0 0 0 

163



Project: Vernon Avenue Storm Sewer 


Construction of a storm sewer from Vernon Ave. southwest along Conrail RR to 

Branch St. west under Conrail RR underneath Lake St. to the Olentangy River 

and the installation of a 36” storm sewer pipe from Vernon Ave. to Branch St. 

Department: 


Fund: 



The 1990 Storm Water Report update recommended this project (L-1) to 

improve the storm water drainage from Vernon Ave. southwest along Conrail 

RR to Branch St. west under Conrail RR underneath Lake St. to the Olentangy 

River and the installation of a 36” storm sewer pipe from Vernon Ave. to 

Branch St. 





C o nst ru ct io n $ 5 3 5 ,0 0 0 $ 5 3 5 ,0 0 0 

T ot a ls $ 5 3 5 ,0 0 0 $ 5 3 5 ,0 0 0 



T ot a ls $ 5 3 5 ,0 0 0 $ 5 3 5 ,0 0 0 

164


REFUSE FUND 

2009 - 2013 

REVENUES: 

2009 - 2013 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 

Refuse Fees 457,476 428,876 470,276 466,276 466,276 

TOTAL REVENUE 457,476 428,876 470,276 466,276 0 

EXPENDITURES: 

Debt Service 

Curve Rd. Leachate Collection ($475,000 10rs.) 61,238 59,438 57,638 58,638 58,638 

Equipment 

Rear Load 20-Yard Packer - Commercial 140,000 150,000 

8 Yard Dump 113,000 

Side Load 20-Yard Packer - Residential 165,000 165,000 170,000 

Recycling Vehicle - Recycling 170,000 170,000 350,000 

Bulk Pickup Vehicle 

Pickup Truck 32,000 

Skid Steer 45,000 

Landfill 

Leachate Collection System-Curve Road 61,238 59,438 57,638 57,638 57,638 


165

Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) - City of Delaware

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?