05.04.2015 Views

Joint Declaration of Stickney and Kessler in Support of Motion for ...

Joint Declaration of Stickney and Kessler in Support of Motion for ...

Joint Declaration of Stickney and Kessler in Support of Motion for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Case 1:09-md-02017-LAK Document 807 Filed 03/08/12 Page 42 <strong>of</strong> 63<br />

well as their respective current <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong>mer trustees, <strong>of</strong>ficers, directors, pr<strong>in</strong>cipals, predecessors,<br />

successors, assigns, attorneys, parents, affiliates, employers, employees, agents, <strong>and</strong> subsidiaries.<br />

83. As part <strong>of</strong> the agreement with all <strong>of</strong> the Settl<strong>in</strong>g Underwriter Defendants, Lead<br />

Pla<strong>in</strong>tiffs obta<strong>in</strong>ed the right to withdraw from the proposed Underwriter Settlement at any time<br />

prior to fil<strong>in</strong>g their motion <strong>for</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al approval <strong>of</strong> the proposed Underwriter Settlement if, <strong>in</strong> their<br />

good faith discretion, Lead Pla<strong>in</strong>tiffs determ<strong>in</strong>e that the proposed Underwriter Settlement is<br />

unfair, unreasonable <strong>and</strong>/or <strong>in</strong>adequate based upon <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation obta<strong>in</strong>ed prior to mov<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong><br />

f<strong>in</strong>al approval. For the reasons set <strong>for</strong>th here<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> the memor<strong>and</strong>um <strong>in</strong> support <strong>of</strong> the motion<br />

<strong>for</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al approval <strong>of</strong> the Settlements, Lead Pla<strong>in</strong>tiffs have determ<strong>in</strong>ed that the Underwriter<br />

Settlement is fair, reasonable <strong>and</strong> adequate <strong>in</strong> all respects.<br />

3. Reasons For The Settlement With<br />

The Settl<strong>in</strong>g Underwriter Defendants<br />

84. The Securities Act claims aga<strong>in</strong>st the Underwriter Defendants arise from twelve<br />

<strong>of</strong> Lehman’s debt <strong>and</strong> equity <strong>of</strong>fer<strong>in</strong>gs between July 2007 <strong>and</strong> May 2008. Lehman itself<br />

underwrote most <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong>fer<strong>in</strong>g. Of the approximate $20.2 billion sold <strong>in</strong> the twelve <strong>of</strong>fer<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

that are the subject <strong>of</strong> the Securities Act claims <strong>in</strong> this Action, Lehman underwrote<br />

approximately 83% <strong>of</strong> the securities <strong>of</strong>fered. The Underwriter Defendants underwrote<br />

approximately $3.5 billion. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to 15 U.S.C. § 77k(e), “In no event shall any<br />

underwriter . . . be liable <strong>in</strong> any suit or as a consequence <strong>of</strong> suits authorized under [§ 11(a)] <strong>for</strong><br />

damages <strong>in</strong> excess <strong>of</strong> the total price at which the securities underwritten by him <strong>and</strong> distributed<br />

to the public were <strong>of</strong>fered to the public.” The Underwriter Defendants, there<strong>for</strong>e, contended<br />

throughout that their liability would be statutorily limited to the amounts that each underwrote.<br />

85. Lead Counsel engaged a consultant to assist <strong>in</strong> estimat<strong>in</strong>g potentially recoverable<br />

damages. This estimate, be<strong>for</strong>e tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account causation or other defenses to damages,<br />

31

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!