12.04.2015 Views

Technical Bulletin, Pronto-7 Accuracy - Masimo

Technical Bulletin, Pronto-7 Accuracy - Masimo

Technical Bulletin, Pronto-7 Accuracy - Masimo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Technical</strong> <strong>Bulletin</strong><br />

optical interference. Two consecutive noninvasive total hemoglobin (SpHb) readings were obtained from each subject,<br />

detaching and reattaching the sensor between each measurement. Perfusion index, finger temperature, and SpO2,<br />

displayed by the noninvasive hemoglobin test device, were also recorded. Testing was conducted while patients were still,<br />

quiet and sitting upright with their hands on the tabletop.<br />

Immediately following the noninvasive testing, a venous blood sample was obtained by venipuncture of the median<br />

cubital vein of the non-dominant arm (when obtainable) with a disposable syringe and then transferred to 2-mL vacuum<br />

tube containing EDTA (Ethylene-DiamineTetraacetic Acid), an anticoagulant. Venous blood samples were transported<br />

at room temperature and analyzed for reference hemoglobin (tHb) with an automated hematology analyzer (Coulter ®<br />

LH 500, Beckman Coulter, USA 6 ) per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines 8 and the manufacturer’s<br />

directions for use, within 24 hours of collection. The laboratory analyzer was calibrated daily per the manufacturer’s<br />

recommendations and good laboratory practice. The laboratory hematology analyzer used in this study measures<br />

hemoglobin by lysing red blood cells then converting the hemoglobin to a stable pigment. The mass of the hemoglobin<br />

in the sample is then determined by the degree of absorbance of the pigment. The accuracy of this method has been<br />

validated compared to the hemoglobincyanide method, the reference method for hemoglobinometry recommended by<br />

the International Committee for Standardization in Hematology (ICSH). 9<br />

A capillary blood sample was obtained by finger-stick with a 2.25 finger lancet and analyzed immediately with a point<br />

of care hemoglobinometer (HemoCue ® 201+, HemoCue a division of Quest Diagnostics, Cypress, CA 10 ) according to<br />

the manufacturer’s directions for use. The HemoCue is a photometric device that uses microcuvettes that contain<br />

three reagents to lyse red blood cells then convert hemoglobin into methemoglobinazide. The absorbance of<br />

methemoglobinazide is then measured to estimate total hemoglobin. 11 The precision of HemoCue for the measurement<br />

of hemoglobin varies depending on the type of sample. HemoCue is reported to overestimate hemoglobin from capillary<br />

samples by 10-15% compared to the hemoglobincyanide method. 12<br />

<strong>Accuracy</strong> of SpHb and total hemoglobin by the point of care device (POC-tHb) was assessed by calculating bias and<br />

standard deviation of each test method compared to laboratory tHb. To assess repeatability of SpHb measurement,<br />

precision (coefficient of variation) between the first and second SpHb measurements was calculated. Precision was<br />

calculated as the standard deviation of the difference between the two SpHb test results divided by the mean SpHb value<br />

multiplied by 100 and expressed as a percent.<br />

Lastly, multivariate analysis was conducted to evaluate the associations of patient characteristics to SpHb-tHb bias. Variables<br />

analyzed were body mass index, age, finger diameter, perfusion index, SpO2, finger temperature, ethnicity, skin pigment,<br />

smoking status, comorbidities (high blood pressure, diabetes, high cholesterol, respiratory disorders, osteoarthritis) and<br />

medications. Multiple logistic regression was performed with significant predictors from the univariate analyses (p≥0.05) to<br />

determine main effects and interactions in a multivariate model. For retention in the model a cut off of p≤0.01 was used.<br />

Results<br />

A total of 474 subjects were enrolled. 34 subjects were excluded for the following reasons: 31 venous samples were not<br />

properly transported and unable to obtain 3 noninvasive SpHb measurements. Of the remaining 440 subjects, 62% were male,<br />

had an average age (±SD) of 36 (±18) years. Four hundred thirty subjects (98%) were from outpatient clinics and 10 (2%) were<br />

from a community health screening event. Subjects consisted of 257 (58%) healthy volunteers and 183 (42%) outpatients<br />

presenting with one or more conditions. The number and percent of the outpatients affected with the most common<br />

conditions were 72 (16%) with diabetes, 68 (15%) with high cholesterol, 32 (7%) with high blood pressure, 21 (5%) with asthma,<br />

17 (4%) with osteoarthritis, 13 (3%) with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 3 (1%) with pregnancy. Patients had one or<br />

more conditions. A total of 369 (84%) of all subjects had light pigmentation, 64 (15%) had medium pigmentation, and 7 (2%)<br />

had dark pigmentation. Patient demographics, medical conditions, and medications are shown in Table 4.<br />

Univariate and Multivariate Analysis of Factors Associated with SpHb Bias<br />

Variables with both univariate and multivariate significance included Massey scale score and SpO2. For each increase in<br />

Massey scale, SpHb bias increased by 0.16 g/dL. Higher biases were observed in darker pigmented patients (Massey scale<br />

score of 4-9) but the number of subjects in this group was small. For each decrease in SpO2 value, SpHb bias decreased by<br />

0.14 g/dL. Subjects with SpO2 of 96% or below therefore had a negative bias.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!