16.11.2012 Views

Food and Nutrition Biotechnology - UNU-IAS - United Nations ...

Food and Nutrition Biotechnology - UNU-IAS - United Nations ...

Food and Nutrition Biotechnology - UNU-IAS - United Nations ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

28<br />

food distributors such as Carrefour, to set up non-GM<br />

soybean production chains in the USA <strong>and</strong> Brazil (Lorelle,<br />

1999a).<br />

In addition to Glon-S<strong>and</strong>ers’ poultry <strong>and</strong> eggs, labelled as<br />

‘biologically produced’ <strong>and</strong> qualified as high-quality <strong>and</strong><br />

rather expensive products, French consumers could buy<br />

another type of product labelled ‘soja du pays’. But for this<br />

kind of poultry, fed with non-GMOs <strong>and</strong> offering a good<br />

safety, the consumer had to pay more (Lorelle, 1999a).<br />

8.7 Fraud<br />

Biological agriculture is not free from criticism because of<br />

fraud. By early 2000, in France, the agriculture ministry’s<br />

Directorate-General for Competition, Consumption <strong>and</strong><br />

Fraud Repression carried out an enquiry on false biological<br />

cereals. About a dozen important operators were involved<br />

in the following traffic: a dealer buys conventional cereals<br />

<strong>and</strong> establishes forged certificates that qualify them as<br />

derived from biological agriculture; the cereals are sold<br />

as ‘bio’ products either to feed producers or directly to<br />

livestock raisers. As the selling price of ‘bio’ cereals could<br />

be twofold of that of conventional cereals, the illegal profit<br />

could vary from 1 Franc to 50 centimes per kilo, <strong>and</strong> because<br />

of the volumes concerned the benefits could be very high.<br />

The French authorities discovered an international network<br />

involving in particular Italian capital. Conventional cereals<br />

were sometimes purchased in France <strong>and</strong> shipped – really<br />

or virtually – to Italy, Belgium or the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s, from<br />

where they returned with the ‘bio’ label. Another traffic<br />

was initiated in Central Europe, particularly in Romania or<br />

Ukraine, <strong>and</strong> the cereals were transferred to France. On 23<br />

March 2000, the French inspectors spotted a society based<br />

in Brittany (Carhaix), Eurograin, which they suspected of<br />

having marketed 50,000 tons of cereals of doubtful origin<br />

in 1998 <strong>and</strong> 1999. Earlier, on 3 March 2000, a public enquiry<br />

had been opened in the Vienne Department regarding<br />

12,000 tons of cereals commercialized by Bio Alliance, a<br />

company based in Chasseneuil-du-Poitou. Its manager was<br />

condemned for having unduly used a ‘bio’ label on bovine<br />

meat. Another enquiry concerned the shipment of the<br />

Celtic Ambassador, a boat inspected in 1997 in Bordeaux;<br />

the 4,500 tons of cereals found in the boat officially<br />

originated from Romania, <strong>and</strong> had been certified ‘bio’ in the<br />

Netherl<strong>and</strong>s. The enquiry showed that the shipment had<br />

been made at Fos-sur-Mer, in the southeast of France, <strong>and</strong><br />

that the cereals were conventional French ones (Hopquin,<br />

2000a).<br />

Similar trafficking may crop up. It underlines the limitations<br />

of the certifying bodies, in charge of controlling the<br />

fulfilment of biological agriculture requisites through two<br />

annual visits without warning. There were three certifying<br />

organisms in France. The most important one, Ecocert,<br />

covered 80 per cent of the market; by mid-1999, it was<br />

able to detect pesticide traces in animal feed produced by<br />

Central Soya, a neighbour <strong>and</strong> client of Eurograin. Ecocert<br />

then alerted the certifying organism of Eurograin, Afaq-<br />

Ascert, which had been controlling this company since 1998.<br />

Many officials have recommended the stricter enforcement<br />

of biological agriculture requisites, considered as too loose<br />

(Hopquin, 2000a).<br />

Fraud <strong>and</strong> the subsequent mistrust could also explain<br />

the relative slump in the consumption of ‘bio’ products.<br />

Another explanation of this decrease is the competition<br />

among quality labels as well as the trend toward a more<br />

environment-friendly agriculture (‘rational’ agriculture’)<br />

that may kidnap the image relating to organic farming<br />

(Dupont, 2001).<br />

8.8 ‘Rational’ agriculture<br />

“Rational” agriculture’s goal is to make a compromise<br />

between productivity <strong>and</strong> environment conservation. In<br />

France, the terms of reference of this mode of agricultural<br />

production contain 98 points relating to the improvement<br />

of agricultural practices (better use of pesticides <strong>and</strong><br />

recycling of wastes, improvement of sanitation, precise<br />

recording of farmer’s practices, better prevention of animal<br />

diseases) <strong>and</strong> upkeep of farm economic profitability<br />

(Dupont, 2003).<br />

A key issue of conventional agriculture is the better <strong>and</strong><br />

more effective use of fertilizers by crops. Increasing the<br />

absorption <strong>and</strong> assimilation of macronutrients such<br />

as nitrogen fertilizers would therefore contribute to<br />

decreasing the percentage of these fertilizers not used by<br />

plants <strong>and</strong> therefore to drastically reduce soil <strong>and</strong> water<br />

pollution by nitrogen compounds. In this regard the work<br />

by Shuichi Yanagisawa <strong>and</strong> colleagues of the Universities<br />

of Okayama <strong>and</strong> Tokyo, published in the Proceedings of<br />

the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) on 18 May 2004<br />

could be very promising. The Japanese researchers were<br />

able to incorporate into the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana<br />

a gene from maize that improves nitrogen assimilation<br />

in this crop species. The gene transferred, Dof1, does not<br />

only control the synthesis of a protein, but also a series<br />

of genetic regulations involved in the constitution of the<br />

plant’s ‘skeleton’. In Arabidopsis thaliana, indeed, Dof1<br />

has modified the expression of several genes: amino-acid<br />

concentration has increased, that of glucose was lowered<br />

compared with control plants, but not that of sucrose. But<br />

the most striking modification concerned the growth of the<br />

transgenic plants in an environment with limited amounts<br />

of nitrogen: control plants showed symptoms of deficiency<br />

such as blemished leaves, while transgenic plants looked<br />

normal. As a follow-up to the experiment on Arabidopsis<br />

thaliana, Dof1 has been transferred to potato plants by<br />

the Japanese workers; as a result, the amount of amino<br />

acids in the genetically modified plants increased. This<br />

result is promising, because potatoes are not very efficient<br />

in absorbing <strong>and</strong> assimilating nitrogen compounds;<br />

henceforth the need to add such fertilizers to this crop<br />

(Morin, 2004).<br />

Increasing biological nitrogen fixation (instead of nitrogen<br />

fertilizer inputs) is also an objective of ‘rational’ agriculture.<br />

Legumes are able to fix atmospheric nitrogen thanks to<br />

symbiotic bacteria living in their root nodules (Rhizobium)<br />

<strong>and</strong> they need much less nitrogen fertilizers than other<br />

crop species. An international consortium is carrying out<br />

the sequencing of the genome of the annual alfalfa species,<br />

Medicago truncatula, considered as a model legume. This<br />

genomics work is to be finalized in 2007, but preliminary<br />

results already showed that the genomes of legumes were

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!