Food and Nutrition Biotechnology - UNU-IAS - United Nations ...
Food and Nutrition Biotechnology - UNU-IAS - United Nations ...
Food and Nutrition Biotechnology - UNU-IAS - United Nations ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
28<br />
food distributors such as Carrefour, to set up non-GM<br />
soybean production chains in the USA <strong>and</strong> Brazil (Lorelle,<br />
1999a).<br />
In addition to Glon-S<strong>and</strong>ers’ poultry <strong>and</strong> eggs, labelled as<br />
‘biologically produced’ <strong>and</strong> qualified as high-quality <strong>and</strong><br />
rather expensive products, French consumers could buy<br />
another type of product labelled ‘soja du pays’. But for this<br />
kind of poultry, fed with non-GMOs <strong>and</strong> offering a good<br />
safety, the consumer had to pay more (Lorelle, 1999a).<br />
8.7 Fraud<br />
Biological agriculture is not free from criticism because of<br />
fraud. By early 2000, in France, the agriculture ministry’s<br />
Directorate-General for Competition, Consumption <strong>and</strong><br />
Fraud Repression carried out an enquiry on false biological<br />
cereals. About a dozen important operators were involved<br />
in the following traffic: a dealer buys conventional cereals<br />
<strong>and</strong> establishes forged certificates that qualify them as<br />
derived from biological agriculture; the cereals are sold<br />
as ‘bio’ products either to feed producers or directly to<br />
livestock raisers. As the selling price of ‘bio’ cereals could<br />
be twofold of that of conventional cereals, the illegal profit<br />
could vary from 1 Franc to 50 centimes per kilo, <strong>and</strong> because<br />
of the volumes concerned the benefits could be very high.<br />
The French authorities discovered an international network<br />
involving in particular Italian capital. Conventional cereals<br />
were sometimes purchased in France <strong>and</strong> shipped – really<br />
or virtually – to Italy, Belgium or the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s, from<br />
where they returned with the ‘bio’ label. Another traffic<br />
was initiated in Central Europe, particularly in Romania or<br />
Ukraine, <strong>and</strong> the cereals were transferred to France. On 23<br />
March 2000, the French inspectors spotted a society based<br />
in Brittany (Carhaix), Eurograin, which they suspected of<br />
having marketed 50,000 tons of cereals of doubtful origin<br />
in 1998 <strong>and</strong> 1999. Earlier, on 3 March 2000, a public enquiry<br />
had been opened in the Vienne Department regarding<br />
12,000 tons of cereals commercialized by Bio Alliance, a<br />
company based in Chasseneuil-du-Poitou. Its manager was<br />
condemned for having unduly used a ‘bio’ label on bovine<br />
meat. Another enquiry concerned the shipment of the<br />
Celtic Ambassador, a boat inspected in 1997 in Bordeaux;<br />
the 4,500 tons of cereals found in the boat officially<br />
originated from Romania, <strong>and</strong> had been certified ‘bio’ in the<br />
Netherl<strong>and</strong>s. The enquiry showed that the shipment had<br />
been made at Fos-sur-Mer, in the southeast of France, <strong>and</strong><br />
that the cereals were conventional French ones (Hopquin,<br />
2000a).<br />
Similar trafficking may crop up. It underlines the limitations<br />
of the certifying bodies, in charge of controlling the<br />
fulfilment of biological agriculture requisites through two<br />
annual visits without warning. There were three certifying<br />
organisms in France. The most important one, Ecocert,<br />
covered 80 per cent of the market; by mid-1999, it was<br />
able to detect pesticide traces in animal feed produced by<br />
Central Soya, a neighbour <strong>and</strong> client of Eurograin. Ecocert<br />
then alerted the certifying organism of Eurograin, Afaq-<br />
Ascert, which had been controlling this company since 1998.<br />
Many officials have recommended the stricter enforcement<br />
of biological agriculture requisites, considered as too loose<br />
(Hopquin, 2000a).<br />
Fraud <strong>and</strong> the subsequent mistrust could also explain<br />
the relative slump in the consumption of ‘bio’ products.<br />
Another explanation of this decrease is the competition<br />
among quality labels as well as the trend toward a more<br />
environment-friendly agriculture (‘rational’ agriculture’)<br />
that may kidnap the image relating to organic farming<br />
(Dupont, 2001).<br />
8.8 ‘Rational’ agriculture<br />
“Rational” agriculture’s goal is to make a compromise<br />
between productivity <strong>and</strong> environment conservation. In<br />
France, the terms of reference of this mode of agricultural<br />
production contain 98 points relating to the improvement<br />
of agricultural practices (better use of pesticides <strong>and</strong><br />
recycling of wastes, improvement of sanitation, precise<br />
recording of farmer’s practices, better prevention of animal<br />
diseases) <strong>and</strong> upkeep of farm economic profitability<br />
(Dupont, 2003).<br />
A key issue of conventional agriculture is the better <strong>and</strong><br />
more effective use of fertilizers by crops. Increasing the<br />
absorption <strong>and</strong> assimilation of macronutrients such<br />
as nitrogen fertilizers would therefore contribute to<br />
decreasing the percentage of these fertilizers not used by<br />
plants <strong>and</strong> therefore to drastically reduce soil <strong>and</strong> water<br />
pollution by nitrogen compounds. In this regard the work<br />
by Shuichi Yanagisawa <strong>and</strong> colleagues of the Universities<br />
of Okayama <strong>and</strong> Tokyo, published in the Proceedings of<br />
the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) on 18 May 2004<br />
could be very promising. The Japanese researchers were<br />
able to incorporate into the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana<br />
a gene from maize that improves nitrogen assimilation<br />
in this crop species. The gene transferred, Dof1, does not<br />
only control the synthesis of a protein, but also a series<br />
of genetic regulations involved in the constitution of the<br />
plant’s ‘skeleton’. In Arabidopsis thaliana, indeed, Dof1<br />
has modified the expression of several genes: amino-acid<br />
concentration has increased, that of glucose was lowered<br />
compared with control plants, but not that of sucrose. But<br />
the most striking modification concerned the growth of the<br />
transgenic plants in an environment with limited amounts<br />
of nitrogen: control plants showed symptoms of deficiency<br />
such as blemished leaves, while transgenic plants looked<br />
normal. As a follow-up to the experiment on Arabidopsis<br />
thaliana, Dof1 has been transferred to potato plants by<br />
the Japanese workers; as a result, the amount of amino<br />
acids in the genetically modified plants increased. This<br />
result is promising, because potatoes are not very efficient<br />
in absorbing <strong>and</strong> assimilating nitrogen compounds;<br />
henceforth the need to add such fertilizers to this crop<br />
(Morin, 2004).<br />
Increasing biological nitrogen fixation (instead of nitrogen<br />
fertilizer inputs) is also an objective of ‘rational’ agriculture.<br />
Legumes are able to fix atmospheric nitrogen thanks to<br />
symbiotic bacteria living in their root nodules (Rhizobium)<br />
<strong>and</strong> they need much less nitrogen fertilizers than other<br />
crop species. An international consortium is carrying out<br />
the sequencing of the genome of the annual alfalfa species,<br />
Medicago truncatula, considered as a model legume. This<br />
genomics work is to be finalized in 2007, but preliminary<br />
results already showed that the genomes of legumes were