20.04.2015 Views

Student-Loan-Press-Briefing-Presentation

Student-Loan-Press-Briefing-Presentation

Student-Loan-Press-Briefing-Presentation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Student</strong> <strong>Loan</strong> Borrowing and Repayment Trends, 2015<br />

April 16, 2015<br />

Andrew Haughwout, Donghoon Lee, Joelle Scally, Wilbert van der Klaauw<br />

The views presented here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the<br />

Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or the Federal Reserve System.


Some higher education background<br />

• College remains a worthwhile investment for most of those who<br />

pursue it<br />

• Median annual earnings were $23,000 higher for bachelor’s<br />

degree holders compared to high school graduates in 2014<br />

• Unemployment rates for bachelor’s degree holders much lower<br />

than high school graduates (6% vs 3.5% in 2014)<br />

• <strong>Student</strong> loans are an important tool for financing college for<br />

many students<br />

• Speech by William C. Dudley, March 4 on student loans:<br />

• “ . . .[T]here is much uncertainty and heterogeneity in outcomes,<br />

with net returns to these human capital investments being<br />

negative for some. Understanding causes and consequences of<br />

this heterogeneity is important.”<br />

• “How we finance post-secondary education has significant effects<br />

on a variety of critical economic outcomes.”<br />

2


Researching student borrowing<br />

• We try to better understand student loans for two reasons:<br />

• <strong>Student</strong> debt is large, and appears to have significant<br />

effects on macroeconomic outcomes (household formation,<br />

homeownership, consumption)<br />

• Good information on borrowing and repayment is necessary<br />

to design best policies for financing this most important kind<br />

of investment<br />

3


<strong>Student</strong> loans defy business cycle<br />

Billions of Dollars<br />

1200<br />

1100<br />

1000<br />

900<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

Non - mortgage balances<br />

HELOC Auto <strong>Loan</strong> <strong>Student</strong> <strong>Loan</strong> Credit Card<br />

Billions of Dollars<br />

1200<br />

1100<br />

1000<br />

900<br />

800<br />

700<br />

600<br />

500<br />

400<br />

300<br />

200<br />

100<br />

0<br />

Source: New York Fed Consumer Credit Panel / Equifax<br />

4


<strong>Student</strong> loans increased as other debts declined<br />

• During and after the Great Recession, households reduced<br />

their other debts, but student loan balances continued to<br />

increase<br />

• Because the majority of student loans are federal, tight bank<br />

lending standards did not affect student loans<br />

• The increase was a result of both increasing numbers of<br />

borrowers and increasing average balances per borrower<br />

• Between 2004 and 2014, there was an 89% increase in the<br />

number of borrowers and a 77% increase in the average balance<br />

size<br />

• College enrollment grew by 20% between 2005 and 2010 –<br />

faster than any period since the 1970’s – and has declined<br />

slightly since<br />

5


Total student loan balances by age group<br />

Billions of Dollars<br />

1,200<br />

under 30 30-39 40-49 50-59 60+<br />

5%<br />

1,000<br />

12%<br />

800<br />

18%<br />

600<br />

33%<br />

400<br />

200<br />

2%<br />

9%<br />

14%<br />

33%<br />

32%<br />

42%<br />

0<br />

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014<br />

Source: New York Fed Consumer Credit Panel / Equifax<br />

6


Increases among borrowers of all ages<br />

• <strong>Student</strong> loan balances grew for borrowers of all ages between<br />

2004 and 2014:<br />

• The number of borrowers over 40 increased at twice the pace of<br />

the number of borrowers under 40<br />

▫ Especially fast growth in balances held by for borrowers age 60+, up<br />

nearly nine-fold<br />

• As a consequence, share of balances held by borrowers age 40+<br />

increased from 25% to 35%<br />

• 2/3 of student loan balances are held by borrowers not in their<br />

20s<br />

7


Distribution of borrowers by 2014Q4 balance<br />

1.0%<br />

0.8%<br />

2.4%<br />

≤$5k<br />

7.2%<br />

2.9%<br />

20.8%<br />

Balance in 2014Q4:<br />

18.5%<br />

>$5k and ≤$10k<br />

>$10k and ≤$25k<br />

>$25k and ≤$50k<br />

>$50k and ≤$75k<br />

>$75k and ≤$100k<br />

>$100k and ≤$150k<br />

>$150k and ≤$200k<br />

>$200k<br />

18.0%<br />

28.5%<br />

43.3 million borrowers<br />

Mean balance: $26,700<br />

Median balance: $14,400<br />

Source: FRBNY Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax<br />

8


Significant heterogeneity in amounts owed<br />

• Most borrowers have a current outstanding balance below $25k<br />

• About 40% owe less than $10K<br />

• Mean outstanding balance is $26k; median balance is $15k<br />

• Significant numbers of borrowers with large balances (over $25K)<br />

• Borrowers in their 30’s and 40’s have the highest mean and<br />

median balances, at about $31k and $17k respectively<br />

9


Who is borrowing now?<br />

Millions<br />

14<br />

Number of originating borrowers by age*<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014<br />

less than 25 25-29 30-39 40+<br />

Source: FRBNY Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax; * excludes small number of borrowers with missing age<br />

10


Number of active borrowers peaked in 2010<br />

• The number of active student loan borrowers peaked in 2010,<br />

at about 12 million; now down to about 9 million<br />

• Half of active borrowers are under age 25<br />

• After the recession, there was a slight increase in the relative<br />

share of new borrowers in their thirties, and a decline in the share<br />

of 18-29 year olds<br />

• The Department of Education estimates suggest that there was<br />

a modest drop in enrollment between 2010 and 2013, of about<br />

500,000 students<br />

• More importantly, a smaller share of enrolled students has<br />

taken out loans since 2010<br />

• Although the number of active borrowers is declining, the<br />

aggregate outstanding balance of borrowers overall has<br />

continued to grow as repayment rates are very low<br />

11


Increase, then decline in borrowers from lower<br />

and middle income areas<br />

Millions<br />

14<br />

Number of originating borrowers by ZIP code income*<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014<br />

up to 40k 40k-60k 60k-80k 80k+<br />

12<br />

Source: FRBNY Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax; Internal Revenue Service; * excludes small number of borrowers with missing ZIP code incomes


Larger rise in level of lower income borrowers<br />

following recession<br />

Index, 2004=100<br />

1.5<br />

Active borrowers by ZIP code income<br />

1.4<br />

1.3<br />

1.2<br />

1.1<br />

1<br />

0.9<br />

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014<br />

up to 40k 40k-60k 60k-80k 80k-100k<br />

13<br />

Source: FRBNY Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax; Internal Revenue Service; * excludes small number of borrowers with missing ZIP code incomes


Increase, then decline in borrowers from<br />

lower and middle income areas<br />

• We don’t have borrower income, so we assign borrowers to<br />

groups based on the average income in the ZIP code they lived<br />

in when they originated their first student loan<br />

• Income data are from IRS and refer to 2010<br />

• Much of the change in borrowing has come from an increase,<br />

then decrease, in the number of active borrowers from lower<br />

income areas following the recession<br />

• More borrowers from lower and middle-income areas is<br />

consistent with the intended purpose of student loan program:<br />

to facilitate upward income mobility<br />

14


Wrapping up, part 1<br />

• <strong>Student</strong> debt continues to increase, especially for older<br />

borrowers<br />

• Increase reflects new borrowers, higher balances and slow<br />

repayment<br />

• There is significant heterogeneity in amounts owed<br />

• Highest balances are owed by borrowers in their 30s<br />

• The number of active borrowers peaked in 2010<br />

• Significant decline since then<br />

• Increase and subsequent decline driven by borrowers from<br />

relatively lower-income areas<br />

15


<strong>Student</strong> loan default & repayment<br />

for internal use only


Distribution of payment history<br />

Snapshot of Borrowers in 2014:Q4<br />

11%<br />

6%<br />

29%<br />

Percent of Borrowers<br />

always current, balance decreasing<br />

always current, balance increasing<br />

current with previous blemish<br />

20%<br />

now delinquent<br />

now in default<br />

34%<br />

Source: New York Fed Consumer Credit Panel / Equifax<br />

17


Understanding repayment outcomes<br />

• We will compare several groups to better understand the<br />

determinants of repayment outcomes:<br />

• Those who left school before, during, and after the Great<br />

Recession<br />

• Younger borrowers and older borrowers<br />

• Borrowers from higher income and lower income areas<br />

18


Defaults and default rate<br />

Thousands per year<br />

1,400<br />

Annual rate<br />

4.0%<br />

1,200<br />

3.5%<br />

1,000<br />

800<br />

3.0%<br />

2.5%<br />

2.0%<br />

600<br />

400<br />

1.5%<br />

1.0%<br />

200<br />

0.5%<br />

0<br />

2003-4 2005-6 2007-8 2009-10 2011-12 2013-14<br />

defaulted borrowers<br />

rate of default<br />

0.0%<br />

Source: FRBNY Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax<br />

19


Defaults and default rate<br />

• The number of borrowers who default each year (defined as at<br />

least 9 months past due) increased from about half a million ten<br />

years ago to 1.2 million annually in 2011 and 2012<br />

• The number of borrowers who default has declined a bit in the<br />

last two years<br />

• The rapid increase in the defaults is partly due to the increase<br />

in the number of borrowers, but even after accounting for the<br />

increase in the borrowers, the rate of default increased over<br />

time from 2.4% in 2004 to 3.6% in 2012<br />

• The default rate declined somewhat after 2012 to 3.2%<br />

20


Default rate by school leaving cohort<br />

Share ever defaulted by years after leaving school<br />

25%<br />

2009 Cohort<br />

26%<br />

5 years later<br />

2007 Cohort<br />

24%<br />

7 years later<br />

20%<br />

2005 Cohort<br />

25%<br />

9 years later<br />

15%<br />

10%<br />

5%<br />

0%<br />

1 year later 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years 6 years 7 years 8 years 9 years<br />

(after entering repayment)<br />

Source: New York Fed Consumer Credit Panel / Equifax<br />

21


Cohort default rates deteriorate<br />

• Default rates for the 2005, 2007, and 2009 school-leaving cohorts<br />

have all now reached roughly 25%.<br />

− Cohort default rates continue to increase even beyond the<br />

third year of loan repayment<br />

• There is a pronounced worsening of the cohort default rate<br />

schedules over time<br />

− Default rates are higher for later cohorts at virtually all<br />

durations<br />

22


5-year cohort default and delinquency rates<br />

by ZIP income<br />

60%<br />

2005 school<br />

leaving cohort<br />

60%<br />

2007 school<br />

leaving cohort<br />

60%<br />

2009 school<br />

leaving cohort<br />

50%<br />

50%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

40%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

30%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

20%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

10%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

less than<br />

40k<br />

40k-60k 60k-80k 80k+<br />

0%<br />

less than<br />

40k<br />

40k-60k 60k-80k 80k+<br />

0%<br />

less than<br />

40k<br />

40k-60k 60k-80k 80k+<br />

default<br />

120+ dpd<br />

Source: FRBNY Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax<br />

23


Cohort default, delinquency rates by income<br />

• Default and delinquency rates higher in lower-income areas<br />

• Default and delinquency rates for borrowers from higher income<br />

areas (with mean income over $60K) have remained remarkably<br />

stable across the three cohorts<br />

24


5-yr Cohort default and delinquency rates by age<br />

2005 school<br />

leaving cohort<br />

2007 school<br />

leaving cohort<br />

2009 school<br />

leaving cohort<br />

60%<br />

60%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

50%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

40%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

30%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

20%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

10%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

less<br />

than 25<br />

25-29 30-39 40+<br />

0%<br />

less<br />

than 25<br />

25-29 30-39 40+<br />

0%<br />

less<br />

than 25<br />

25-29 30-39 40+<br />

default<br />

120+ dpd<br />

Source: FRBNY Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax<br />

25


Cohort default, delinquency rates<br />

by school-leaving age<br />

• The 5-year-default rate increased for all age groups, and it is<br />

somewhat elevated for those who left school between age 30-<br />

39<br />

• About half of the 2009 cohort borrowers in this age range had<br />

gone through defaults or severe delinquency in the subsequent<br />

5 periods<br />

26


<strong>Student</strong> loan repayment behavior<br />

<strong>Student</strong> <strong>Loan</strong> Repayment Status in 2014<br />

current, balance<br />

increasing<br />

33%<br />

delinquent or in<br />

default<br />

17%<br />

current, same<br />

balance<br />

13%<br />

current and paying<br />

down<br />

37%<br />

Source: New York Fed Consumer Credit Panel / Equifax<br />

27


Nearly half of borrowers are not yet repaying<br />

• 17% of the borrowers are in default or in delinquency<br />

• Only 37% of borrowers are current on their loan and actively<br />

paying down<br />

• 46% of borrowers are current on their loans but are not in<br />

repayment<br />

28


5-year cohort repayment difficulties,<br />

by ZIP income<br />

80%<br />

2005 school<br />

leaving cohort<br />

80%<br />

2007 school<br />

leaving cohort<br />

80%<br />

2009 school<br />

leaving cohort<br />

70%<br />

70%<br />

70%<br />

60%<br />

60%<br />

60%<br />

50%<br />

50%<br />

50%<br />

40%<br />

40%<br />

40%<br />

30%<br />

30%<br />

30%<br />

20%<br />

20%<br />

20%<br />

10%<br />

10%<br />

10%<br />

0%<br />

less than<br />

40k<br />

40k-60k 60k-80k 80k+<br />

0%<br />

less than<br />

40k<br />

40k-60k 60k-80k 80k+<br />

default 120+ dpd debt increase<br />

0%<br />

less than<br />

40k<br />

40k-60k 60k-80k 80k+<br />

Source: FRBNY Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax<br />

29


Proportion of borrowers with payment problems<br />

by cohort and income<br />

• While default and delinquency rates were stable for higher<br />

income area borrowers across the three cohorts, more recent<br />

cohorts from higher income areas had a larger proportion who<br />

had not paid down<br />

• About half of the 2009 cohort are having payment difficulties on<br />

their loans (having either defaulted, gone delinquent or made<br />

no progress paying off their balance)<br />

• Repayment difficulties are particularly prevalent in<br />

borrowers from lower-income areas, where about 2/3 of<br />

borrowers have had some sort of repayment difficulty<br />

• In contrast, just over 1/3 of the borrowers from the highest<br />

income areas have had repayment difficulties<br />

30


2009 cohort repayment rates by income<br />

Proportion of balance remaining by ZIP income<br />

100%<br />

95%<br />

90%<br />

85%<br />

80%<br />

75%<br />

70%<br />

65%<br />

60%<br />

1 year 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years<br />

(years after leaving school)<br />

less than 40k 40k-60k 60k-80k 80k+<br />

Source: FRBNY Consumer Credit Panel/Equifax<br />

31


Little repayment progress by borrowers from<br />

lower-income areas<br />

• We look at the net progress that borrowers from each income<br />

area have made in paying down their student loan balances<br />

• The borrowers from the lowest income areas have made<br />

practically no progress on paying down their loans<br />

• The aggregate balance, five years after leaving school, is<br />

still at 97% of where it was when they left school<br />

• This is a sharp contrast with the borrowers from higherincome<br />

areas, who have paid down nearly 30%<br />

32


Wrapping up<br />

• These results are further evidence of the important<br />

heterogeneity we see in the outcomes of higher education<br />

investments financed with student debt<br />

• Borrowers who left school in the Great Recession had particular<br />

difficulty with their student loan repayment, with many defaulting,<br />

becoming seriously delinquent, or not being able to reduce their<br />

balance<br />

• Borrowers from lower and middle-income areas as well as<br />

borrowers who originated loans in their 30s are also at greater risk<br />

of default and delinquency<br />

• The low overall repayment rate helps explain the steady growth<br />

in aggregate student debt, now at nearly 1.2 trillion dollars<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!