21.04.2015 Views

Courier September 2012 - myroyalmail

Courier September 2012 - myroyalmail

Courier September 2012 - myroyalmail

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

24 <strong>September</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />

email<br />

courier@abcomm.co.uk<br />

letterbox<br />

All letters printed win a £25 One4All gift card.<br />

We do try to include as many publishable letters as possible, but due to space<br />

we are unable to publish all of them.<br />

P739s – your<br />

views aired<br />

Many times I’ve<br />

needed to obtain<br />

a signature<br />

and the doors<br />

and windows are<br />

open, the lights are<br />

on, the TV/stereo<br />

is on, you can<br />

occasionally see<br />

children moving<br />

about inside. So<br />

I stand in the<br />

doorway and<br />

ring the doorbell<br />

a few times<br />

(which probably<br />

doesn’t work), I<br />

knock on the door a few times, I shout<br />

‘Hello!’ many times at varying volumes.<br />

I walk around the property to see if I<br />

can attract someone’s attention, but<br />

with no success. So after five minutes I<br />

eventually give up and write out a P739<br />

card, knowing the customer is present.<br />

Guess what? Five minutes later the<br />

customer is chasing me down the street<br />

waving the card like a declaration<br />

of war, their face contorted with<br />

ideas on the cards<br />

Here’s an easy way to improve ‘Something<br />

for you’ cards and customer satisfaction.<br />

Currently, P739 cards say:<br />

Please leave ____ hours before collecting.<br />

We fill in some figure here, which we<br />

have to work out at every delivery stop<br />

where there is no answer. And we must<br />

also remember to write the current time<br />

on the other side of the card, or the<br />

number of hours will tell the customer<br />

nothing. This is not a good system!<br />

It would be far better if the P739 said:<br />

Your item will be ready to collect Mon/Tues/<br />

Wed/Thur/Fri/Sat at _________ am/pm.<br />

If a postie is not going to return to the<br />

office in time for a customer to collect the<br />

item that day, he/she can quickly circle the<br />

next working day. (This works, whatever<br />

public holidays are ahead). Best practice<br />

would also be to put in the opening time -–<br />

typically 7am – of the delivery office.<br />

If a postie is returning to the office in time<br />

for the customer to collect that day, he/she<br />

The lights are on...<br />

rage, shouting ‘Oi postie! I AM IN!’<br />

Despite my best attempts to explain<br />

what had happened, they simply sign<br />

for the item, snatch it from my hand<br />

and stomp back home, satisfied that<br />

once they’ve called my delivery office<br />

to complain then they’ve succeeded in<br />

sorting the problem that they’ve read in<br />

the papers about dodgy postmen.<br />

Chris Hubbard, postman, Shipdham<br />

We do recognise that the vast majority of our<br />

postmen and women perform their role in<br />

the correct way, including following the P739<br />

‘Something for you’ process correctly.<br />

However, P739 complaints continue to<br />

increase and have now become the single<br />

biggest cause for our customers to complain<br />

to us, especially regarding customers saying<br />

they were in.<br />

It is important that we continue to work<br />

in the correct way, and follow our internal<br />

processes correctly at all times. As long as we<br />

do, then any customer complaints relating to<br />

P739s can be dealt with in the knowledge that<br />

all our staff are following the correct process for<br />

items that are too large or require a signature<br />

on delivery.<br />

can easily circle the current day, and enter<br />

the time that the item will be available. It’s<br />

easy to do, and very clear and simple for<br />

the customer, who can see immediately<br />

when the item is ready to collect.<br />

Another idea would be to add a DO<br />

NOT BEND item on the P739.<br />

It would be helpful for the caller’s<br />

office staff if there was a tick box on the<br />

P739 indicating this, and it will save the<br />

conscientious postie from having to write<br />

“DO NOT BEND ITEM” on the card.<br />

Stephen Collings, postman, Redhill<br />

These are excellent suggestions. We are limited in<br />

the amount of information that can be provided on<br />

the cards, but there is currently a project looking<br />

at this type of idea, and in particular standardising<br />

the time in which undeliverable mail can be<br />

made available for collection. I have passed your<br />

suggestions to the team looking at the redesign<br />

so they can be considered for inclusion, along<br />

with the other good ideas that have come as a<br />

result of the wraparound.<br />

• Ed: <strong>Courier</strong> will keep you posted on any changes<br />

Our mailbag was brimming with comments after our wraparound<br />

(pictured) on P739 ‘Something for you’ cards last issue. Here’s a<br />

selection – unless indicated, replies come from Andy Hughes,<br />

operations customer experience manager.<br />

Speed v quality<br />

The wraparound P739 feature on the latest <strong>Courier</strong><br />

was quite interesting and useful. I sincerely wish<br />

that Work Time Listening and Learning sessions<br />

covered this sort of thing in depth more often.<br />

Most of the customer complaints that our office<br />

justifiably receives about P739s are a result of lack<br />

of training and foresight. Regrettably, doing the<br />

job quickly (and therefore cheaply) is too often<br />

viewed as being preferable to doing it carefully<br />

and properly – this is a fact of Royal Mail life in<br />

many locations and no amount of World Class Mail<br />

initiatives will change it, unfortunately.<br />

I do, however, take issue with a couple of points<br />

in your feature. I don’t doubt that occasionally<br />

compensation is paid as a result of P739 complaints,<br />

but this is surely very rare, and it is typically<br />

misleading of you to give this such great prominence.<br />

You are correct, however, to highlight the effect that<br />

poor performance has on all our reputations.<br />

Peter White, postman, Hampshire<br />

Thank you for the feedback. This is one of many cascades<br />

we have done to the frontline on the subject and to help units<br />

in training and guidance on P739 process and completion,<br />

especially for new entrants or as a refresher.<br />

The P739 Intervention Pack, on our Customer Experience<br />

SharePoint site on the intranet, provides in-depth detail and<br />

understanding of the P739 process. These are very useful<br />

for Work Time Listening and Learning, and we have recently<br />

time to communicate<br />

I read your letter about ‘bad timing’ when<br />

delivering P739s to time locked premises, and<br />

the response from Brian Thorley. In 27 years as a<br />

postman I have never heard of the 18 days of trying<br />

to deliver a packet to a time locked building.<br />

I am also confident a lot of my colleagues haven’t<br />

heard about this either given conversations that<br />

have cropped up over the years.<br />

Fairly recently a driver had told me he couldn’t<br />

deliver an item to a flat due to the time lock, and<br />

when he brought the item back to the office was<br />

told by a manager to put a “kill off” sticker and<br />

endorse it as “unable to gain access”. Consequently,<br />

the recipient of this item never received it and<br />

had no knowledge for a long time as to what had<br />

happened to their item. I too have been told to do<br />

this with letters that I could not gain entry with. We<br />

have regular and informative Work Time Listening<br />

and Learning sessions, but I and my colleagues do<br />

not recall this ever being mentioned.<br />

Does this same scenario of 18 days apply to<br />

posties who cannot gain access with letters? If so,<br />

can you tell me how a postie would be expected<br />

to go to a tower block if the buzzer system was not<br />

LETTERBOX<br />

LETTERBOX<br />

Email courierletters@abcomm.co.uk,<br />

write to <strong>Courier</strong> letters,<br />

24-26 Great Suffolk Street,<br />

Email<br />

courierletters@abcomm.co.uk<br />

write to <strong>Courier</strong> letters,<br />

24-26 Great Suffolk Street,<br />

LONDON SE1 0UE<br />

please make your letter no more<br />

than 100 words<br />

TEXT COURIER TO 80800<br />

(MAX 160 CHARACTERS)<br />

Please include your home address<br />

with your letter<br />

filmed a RMTV feature on this as well.<br />

I will ensure that your office and sector managers are fully<br />

aware of the P739 Intervention Pack and RMTV film, and will offer<br />

further support on how to cascade the information in your unit.<br />

Mixed messages<br />

There is quite a focus on P739 cards and complaints<br />

at the moment. I’m sure many customers think<br />

the brown cards we deliver without knocking and<br />

the red ones are the same thing. This is causing<br />

confusion and extra complaints.<br />

We often deliver the brown cards that say<br />

‘Unfortunately there is a fee to pay.’ Could a<br />

bold statement be clearly printed on the card to<br />

mention to the customer that the postman does<br />

not have the item with them, or redesign them to<br />

look totally different?<br />

On many occasions I have been halfway down<br />

a street, only to have an angry customer come out<br />

wanting me to come back and explain to them<br />

where the item is and why I haven’t knocked on the<br />

door!<br />

Andrew Hunt, postman, Basingstoke<br />

A valid point. In most instances of us leaving a P739<br />

‘Something for you’ card or P4605 ‘Fee to pay’ card, the<br />

customer recognises the difference by the different colours.<br />

However, I have forwarded this suggestion to the product<br />

manager so our branding can be reviewed when the cards<br />

are next due to go for a reprint.<br />

working for a long time? The postbag would be<br />

really heavy after a few days, let alone 18.<br />

Neil Rixon, postman, Leagrave<br />

Brian Thorley, operations and product<br />

specification manager, replies:<br />

Following the letter and reply, we received a number of<br />

queries regarding the correct procedures if you are unable to<br />

deliver mail to occupants in time locked premises.<br />

We therefore ran an Ops Focus communication in the week<br />

beginning 27 August reminding delivery office managers of<br />

the correct procedures when Royal<br />

Mail delivers to such buildings.<br />

Clear instructions for delivering<br />

to time locked premises can be<br />

found in our Controlled Entry<br />

Systems Operational Procedure.<br />

Anyone who is unclear<br />

about what actions they<br />

should follow should contact<br />

their manager as soon as<br />

possible and ask them<br />

to provide coaching and<br />

guidance for this particular<br />

situation.<br />

London <strong>2012</strong>:<br />

send us your<br />

favourite stamps<br />

moment – contact<br />

details above

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!