Courier September 2012 - myroyalmail
Courier September 2012 - myroyalmail
Courier September 2012 - myroyalmail
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
24 <strong>September</strong> <strong>2012</strong><br />
email<br />
courier@abcomm.co.uk<br />
letterbox<br />
All letters printed win a £25 One4All gift card.<br />
We do try to include as many publishable letters as possible, but due to space<br />
we are unable to publish all of them.<br />
P739s – your<br />
views aired<br />
Many times I’ve<br />
needed to obtain<br />
a signature<br />
and the doors<br />
and windows are<br />
open, the lights are<br />
on, the TV/stereo<br />
is on, you can<br />
occasionally see<br />
children moving<br />
about inside. So<br />
I stand in the<br />
doorway and<br />
ring the doorbell<br />
a few times<br />
(which probably<br />
doesn’t work), I<br />
knock on the door a few times, I shout<br />
‘Hello!’ many times at varying volumes.<br />
I walk around the property to see if I<br />
can attract someone’s attention, but<br />
with no success. So after five minutes I<br />
eventually give up and write out a P739<br />
card, knowing the customer is present.<br />
Guess what? Five minutes later the<br />
customer is chasing me down the street<br />
waving the card like a declaration<br />
of war, their face contorted with<br />
ideas on the cards<br />
Here’s an easy way to improve ‘Something<br />
for you’ cards and customer satisfaction.<br />
Currently, P739 cards say:<br />
Please leave ____ hours before collecting.<br />
We fill in some figure here, which we<br />
have to work out at every delivery stop<br />
where there is no answer. And we must<br />
also remember to write the current time<br />
on the other side of the card, or the<br />
number of hours will tell the customer<br />
nothing. This is not a good system!<br />
It would be far better if the P739 said:<br />
Your item will be ready to collect Mon/Tues/<br />
Wed/Thur/Fri/Sat at _________ am/pm.<br />
If a postie is not going to return to the<br />
office in time for a customer to collect the<br />
item that day, he/she can quickly circle the<br />
next working day. (This works, whatever<br />
public holidays are ahead). Best practice<br />
would also be to put in the opening time -–<br />
typically 7am – of the delivery office.<br />
If a postie is returning to the office in time<br />
for the customer to collect that day, he/she<br />
The lights are on...<br />
rage, shouting ‘Oi postie! I AM IN!’<br />
Despite my best attempts to explain<br />
what had happened, they simply sign<br />
for the item, snatch it from my hand<br />
and stomp back home, satisfied that<br />
once they’ve called my delivery office<br />
to complain then they’ve succeeded in<br />
sorting the problem that they’ve read in<br />
the papers about dodgy postmen.<br />
Chris Hubbard, postman, Shipdham<br />
We do recognise that the vast majority of our<br />
postmen and women perform their role in<br />
the correct way, including following the P739<br />
‘Something for you’ process correctly.<br />
However, P739 complaints continue to<br />
increase and have now become the single<br />
biggest cause for our customers to complain<br />
to us, especially regarding customers saying<br />
they were in.<br />
It is important that we continue to work<br />
in the correct way, and follow our internal<br />
processes correctly at all times. As long as we<br />
do, then any customer complaints relating to<br />
P739s can be dealt with in the knowledge that<br />
all our staff are following the correct process for<br />
items that are too large or require a signature<br />
on delivery.<br />
can easily circle the current day, and enter<br />
the time that the item will be available. It’s<br />
easy to do, and very clear and simple for<br />
the customer, who can see immediately<br />
when the item is ready to collect.<br />
Another idea would be to add a DO<br />
NOT BEND item on the P739.<br />
It would be helpful for the caller’s<br />
office staff if there was a tick box on the<br />
P739 indicating this, and it will save the<br />
conscientious postie from having to write<br />
“DO NOT BEND ITEM” on the card.<br />
Stephen Collings, postman, Redhill<br />
These are excellent suggestions. We are limited in<br />
the amount of information that can be provided on<br />
the cards, but there is currently a project looking<br />
at this type of idea, and in particular standardising<br />
the time in which undeliverable mail can be<br />
made available for collection. I have passed your<br />
suggestions to the team looking at the redesign<br />
so they can be considered for inclusion, along<br />
with the other good ideas that have come as a<br />
result of the wraparound.<br />
• Ed: <strong>Courier</strong> will keep you posted on any changes<br />
Our mailbag was brimming with comments after our wraparound<br />
(pictured) on P739 ‘Something for you’ cards last issue. Here’s a<br />
selection – unless indicated, replies come from Andy Hughes,<br />
operations customer experience manager.<br />
Speed v quality<br />
The wraparound P739 feature on the latest <strong>Courier</strong><br />
was quite interesting and useful. I sincerely wish<br />
that Work Time Listening and Learning sessions<br />
covered this sort of thing in depth more often.<br />
Most of the customer complaints that our office<br />
justifiably receives about P739s are a result of lack<br />
of training and foresight. Regrettably, doing the<br />
job quickly (and therefore cheaply) is too often<br />
viewed as being preferable to doing it carefully<br />
and properly – this is a fact of Royal Mail life in<br />
many locations and no amount of World Class Mail<br />
initiatives will change it, unfortunately.<br />
I do, however, take issue with a couple of points<br />
in your feature. I don’t doubt that occasionally<br />
compensation is paid as a result of P739 complaints,<br />
but this is surely very rare, and it is typically<br />
misleading of you to give this such great prominence.<br />
You are correct, however, to highlight the effect that<br />
poor performance has on all our reputations.<br />
Peter White, postman, Hampshire<br />
Thank you for the feedback. This is one of many cascades<br />
we have done to the frontline on the subject and to help units<br />
in training and guidance on P739 process and completion,<br />
especially for new entrants or as a refresher.<br />
The P739 Intervention Pack, on our Customer Experience<br />
SharePoint site on the intranet, provides in-depth detail and<br />
understanding of the P739 process. These are very useful<br />
for Work Time Listening and Learning, and we have recently<br />
time to communicate<br />
I read your letter about ‘bad timing’ when<br />
delivering P739s to time locked premises, and<br />
the response from Brian Thorley. In 27 years as a<br />
postman I have never heard of the 18 days of trying<br />
to deliver a packet to a time locked building.<br />
I am also confident a lot of my colleagues haven’t<br />
heard about this either given conversations that<br />
have cropped up over the years.<br />
Fairly recently a driver had told me he couldn’t<br />
deliver an item to a flat due to the time lock, and<br />
when he brought the item back to the office was<br />
told by a manager to put a “kill off” sticker and<br />
endorse it as “unable to gain access”. Consequently,<br />
the recipient of this item never received it and<br />
had no knowledge for a long time as to what had<br />
happened to their item. I too have been told to do<br />
this with letters that I could not gain entry with. We<br />
have regular and informative Work Time Listening<br />
and Learning sessions, but I and my colleagues do<br />
not recall this ever being mentioned.<br />
Does this same scenario of 18 days apply to<br />
posties who cannot gain access with letters? If so,<br />
can you tell me how a postie would be expected<br />
to go to a tower block if the buzzer system was not<br />
LETTERBOX<br />
LETTERBOX<br />
Email courierletters@abcomm.co.uk,<br />
write to <strong>Courier</strong> letters,<br />
24-26 Great Suffolk Street,<br />
Email<br />
courierletters@abcomm.co.uk<br />
write to <strong>Courier</strong> letters,<br />
24-26 Great Suffolk Street,<br />
LONDON SE1 0UE<br />
please make your letter no more<br />
than 100 words<br />
TEXT COURIER TO 80800<br />
(MAX 160 CHARACTERS)<br />
Please include your home address<br />
with your letter<br />
filmed a RMTV feature on this as well.<br />
I will ensure that your office and sector managers are fully<br />
aware of the P739 Intervention Pack and RMTV film, and will offer<br />
further support on how to cascade the information in your unit.<br />
Mixed messages<br />
There is quite a focus on P739 cards and complaints<br />
at the moment. I’m sure many customers think<br />
the brown cards we deliver without knocking and<br />
the red ones are the same thing. This is causing<br />
confusion and extra complaints.<br />
We often deliver the brown cards that say<br />
‘Unfortunately there is a fee to pay.’ Could a<br />
bold statement be clearly printed on the card to<br />
mention to the customer that the postman does<br />
not have the item with them, or redesign them to<br />
look totally different?<br />
On many occasions I have been halfway down<br />
a street, only to have an angry customer come out<br />
wanting me to come back and explain to them<br />
where the item is and why I haven’t knocked on the<br />
door!<br />
Andrew Hunt, postman, Basingstoke<br />
A valid point. In most instances of us leaving a P739<br />
‘Something for you’ card or P4605 ‘Fee to pay’ card, the<br />
customer recognises the difference by the different colours.<br />
However, I have forwarded this suggestion to the product<br />
manager so our branding can be reviewed when the cards<br />
are next due to go for a reprint.<br />
working for a long time? The postbag would be<br />
really heavy after a few days, let alone 18.<br />
Neil Rixon, postman, Leagrave<br />
Brian Thorley, operations and product<br />
specification manager, replies:<br />
Following the letter and reply, we received a number of<br />
queries regarding the correct procedures if you are unable to<br />
deliver mail to occupants in time locked premises.<br />
We therefore ran an Ops Focus communication in the week<br />
beginning 27 August reminding delivery office managers of<br />
the correct procedures when Royal<br />
Mail delivers to such buildings.<br />
Clear instructions for delivering<br />
to time locked premises can be<br />
found in our Controlled Entry<br />
Systems Operational Procedure.<br />
Anyone who is unclear<br />
about what actions they<br />
should follow should contact<br />
their manager as soon as<br />
possible and ask them<br />
to provide coaching and<br />
guidance for this particular<br />
situation.<br />
London <strong>2012</strong>:<br />
send us your<br />
favourite stamps<br />
moment – contact<br />
details above