21.04.2015 Views

Lesson 16 Linear Systems - Bruce E. Shapiro

Lesson 16 Linear Systems - Bruce E. Shapiro

Lesson 16 Linear Systems - Bruce E. Shapiro

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

104 LESSON <strong>16</strong>. LINEAR SYSTEMS<br />

1. Convert the system Ax = b into an equivalent form T x = b ′ where T is uppertriangular.<br />

2. Solve for x using back-substitution.<br />

It is possible to take this idea one step further. If we can reduce equation <strong>16</strong>.3 to the<br />

form<br />

Dx = b ′′ (<strong>16</strong>.5)<br />

where D is a diagonal matrix, then it is even easier to read off the solutions, namel,<br />

x i = b ′ i/D ii . In this revised form the matrix D is said to be in Reduced Row<br />

Echelon Form, and the revised algorithm is called Gauss-Jordan Elimination.<br />

The revised algorithm is summarized:<br />

1. Convert the system Ax = b into an equivalent form T x = b ′ , where T is<br />

upper-triangular.<br />

2. Convert the system T x = b ′ into an equivalent form Dx = b ′′ , where D is<br />

diagonal.<br />

3. Solve for the x i .<br />

We will outline the first algorithm (row reduction followed by back-substitution). We<br />

start by writing the linear system<br />

a 11 x 1 + a 12 x 2 + · · · + a 1n x n = b 1 (<strong>16</strong>.6)<br />

a 21 x 1 + a 22 x 2 + · · · + a 2n x n = b 2 (<strong>16</strong>.7)<br />

.<br />

a n11 x 1 + a n2 x 2 + · · · + a nn x n = b n (<strong>16</strong>.8)<br />

From equation <strong>16</strong>.6 we can solve for x 1 in terms of x 2 , . . . , x n ,<br />

x 1 = (b 1 − a 12 x 2 − a 13 x 3 − · · · − a 1n x n )/a 11 (<strong>16</strong>.9)<br />

so if we already know x 2 , . . . , x n we can solve for x 1 immediately. But if we eliminate<br />

x 1 from each of the remaining equations, we have system of n − 1 equations in the<br />

n − 1 variables x 2 , . . . , x n , which is easier to solve than the original system because<br />

it is smaller. We get this system by subtracting an appropriate multiple of the first<br />

equation from each of the remaining equations, namely we subtract<br />

(a i1 /a 11 ) × (a 11 x 1 + a 12 x 2 + · · · + a 1n x n = b 1 ) (<strong>16</strong>.10)<br />

Math 481A<br />

California State University Northridge<br />

2008, B.E.<strong>Shapiro</strong><br />

Last revised: November <strong>16</strong>, 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!