22.04.2015 Views

GBS Answers - Meridian Bioscience, Inc.

GBS Answers - Meridian Bioscience, Inc.

GBS Answers - Meridian Bioscience, Inc.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>GBS</strong><strong>Answers</strong><br />

magazine<br />

IMPORTANT<br />

Information About <strong>GBS</strong><br />

(Group B Streptococcus)<br />

3 What Is<br />

Group B Strep?<br />

6 High Tech Testing<br />

Can Save Babies Lives<br />

7 <strong>GBS</strong> Prevention:<br />

When Tests Get It<br />

Wrong<br />

8 Baby Born With<br />

Life-Threatening<br />

<strong>GBS</strong> Despite Testing<br />

Negative<br />

9 How To Help<br />

Protect Your Baby,<br />

Before And During<br />

Labor<br />

10 4 Facts About<br />

Group B Strep<br />

11 4 Tips For Moms<br />

Who Test Positive<br />

For <strong>GBS</strong><br />

Know Your<br />

Options<br />

Not All Group B Streptococcus<br />

Tests Are Equal…<br />

4


ABOUT MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE, INC.<br />

<strong>Meridian</strong> is a fully integrated life science company that<br />

develops, manufactures, markets and distributes a broad<br />

range of innovative diagnostic test kits, purified reagents<br />

and related products and offers biopharmaceutical enabling<br />

technologies. Utilizing a variety of methods, these products<br />

and diagnostic tests provide accuracy, simplicity and speed<br />

in the early diagnosis and treatment of common medical<br />

conditions, such as gastrointestinal, viral and respiratory<br />

infections. <strong>Meridian</strong>’s diagnostic products are used outside of<br />

the human body and require little or no special equipment.<br />

The Company’s products are designed to enhance patient<br />

well-being while reducing the total outcome costs of<br />

healthcare. <strong>Meridian</strong> has strong market positions in the areas<br />

of gastrointestinal and upper respiratory infections, serology,<br />

parasitology and fungal disease diagnosis. In addition,<br />

<strong>Meridian</strong> is a supplier of rare reagents, specialty biologicals<br />

and related technologies used by biopharmaceutical<br />

companies engaged in research for new drugs and vaccines.<br />

The Company markets its products and technologies<br />

to hospitals, reference laboratories, research centers,<br />

diagnostics manufacturers and biotech companies in more<br />

than 60 countries around the world.<br />

<strong>Meridian</strong> was recently recognized by Forbes as one of<br />

America’s 100 Most Trustworthy Companies.


<strong>GBS</strong><strong>Answers</strong><br />

What Is<br />

Group B Strep?<br />

Group B Streptococcus, or <strong>GBS</strong>, is a gram<br />

positive bacteria commonly found in the<br />

gastrointestinal, genital and urinary tract of<br />

healthy adults. Approximately 25% of all<br />

pregnant women are colonized with <strong>GBS</strong>.<br />

While Group B Streptococcus colonized<br />

mothers typically show no symptoms or<br />

adverse health effects, the bacteria can be<br />

passed to their child during labor and delivery.<br />

Invasive Group B Streptococcal disease emerged in the 1970’s<br />

as the leading cause of infectious disease in infants. Infants with<br />

early onset infection (


When It Comes to <strong>GBS</strong><br />

Testing, Ask for the Best<br />

There was a time when losing newborns to Group<br />

B Streptococcus (<strong>GBS</strong>) was not at all rare. In the<br />

last few decades that has changed. Tragically, it still<br />

happens, but not nearly as often as it used to. The<br />

reason for the improvement? Routine diagnostic<br />

<strong>GBS</strong> testing of pregnant women.<br />

61.4%<br />

Of term infants with<br />

<strong>GBS</strong> disease were born<br />

to women who had<br />

tested negative for <strong>GBS</strong><br />

before delivery<br />

(99.5% were tested with traditional culture)<br />

Van Dyke, et al., NEJM, June 18, 2009; 360(25):2626-36<br />

Approximately 90 percent of pregnant women who get prenatal care are now<br />

being tested for Group B Strep. When a woman tests positive, she is treated<br />

with IV antibiotics during delivery, preventing the transmission of bacteria<br />

that is harmless in mom, but can be deadly to a newborn. That’s the good<br />

news. The bad news is that laboratory tests aren’t perfect and can sometimes<br />

return a negative result when the mother is actually a carrier of <strong>GBS</strong>. Studies<br />

indicated that perhaps more than half of term infants born with <strong>GBS</strong> are born<br />

to mothers who had tested negative for the bacterium.<br />

The traditional method of testing for <strong>GBS</strong> is to take a vaginal swab from the<br />

mother at 35 to 37 weeks in her pregnancy. This sample is cultured to give<br />

the bacteria an opportunity to grow, and then examined to determine if <strong>GBS</strong> is<br />

present. In this traditional method, there are many steps along the way where<br />

mistakes can be introduced, explains Donna Mayne B.S (MT) ASCP, (CLS)<br />

NCA, Molecular Lab Manager at Sacred Heart Hospital in Pensacola, Florida.<br />

“Reading the culture is subjective and the bacteria can take two different<br />

forms,” she says. “One is easy to see; the other is subtle.” The result is that<br />

some women who should be testing positive for <strong>GBS</strong> are getting negative<br />

results back from their tests.<br />

“Accurate testing for <strong>GBS</strong> is so important,” explains Marti Perhach,<br />

President and Founder of the Group B Strep International. “Otherwise,<br />

moms who test negative are given false assurances that they don’t need<br />

to be concerned about helping protect their baby from Group B Strep.<br />

According to a 2009 Study in The New England Journal of Medicine,<br />

4


<strong>GBS</strong><strong>Answers</strong><br />

61 percent of moms who test<br />

negative were actually positive but<br />

the test results were inaccurate.<br />

This translates to babies becoming<br />

infected by <strong>GBS</strong> when there are<br />

proven prevention strategies in<br />

place to protect them during labor<br />

and delivery had their mother’s test<br />

result been positive.”<br />

Fortunately, modern science has<br />

provided an elegant solution to<br />

this problem. A molecular assay,<br />

which locates the piece of DNA<br />

that indicates the presence of <strong>GBS</strong>,<br />

is far more sensitive, says Mayne.<br />

<strong>Meridian</strong> <strong>Bioscience</strong> markets<br />

illumigene ® Group B Streptococcus,<br />

a molecular assay that can locate<br />

<strong>GBS</strong>. Molecular assays are faster<br />

and much more sensitive,” says<br />

Mayne. “Culture-only tests are<br />

accurate less than 50 percent of<br />

the time which is close to flipping a<br />

coin. Molecular testing technology<br />

is now available which is both more<br />

accurate and faster, according to the<br />

NEJM study,” notes Perhach.<br />

Speak Up<br />

<strong>GBS</strong> testing is now a routine part of<br />

prenatal care. The woman goes in for<br />

the test, the clinic sends the swab to<br />

a lab. The results come back, either<br />

positive or negative. An infant’s life<br />

may hang in the balance, but the<br />

mom has no idea what method the<br />

lab is using and all too often, the<br />

doctor doesn’t either.<br />

“As consumers, we never say, ‘I<br />

need a car,’” says Jack Kraeutler,<br />

CEO of <strong>Meridian</strong> <strong>Bioscience</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>.<br />

“We are specific. We shop for<br />

an SUV with 4-wheel drive or a<br />

subcompact that gets good gas<br />

mileage. But in medicine we don’t<br />

even ask.” Mayne also thinks we<br />

should speak up and request quality.<br />

“I encourage women to get tested,<br />

and when you go in for the test ask<br />

your doctor to use a lab that uses a<br />

molecular assay,” she says.<br />

Don’t be shy about asking. Your<br />

child’s life could depend on it.<br />

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––<br />

For more information:<br />

http://www.meridianbioscience.com/diseaseinformation/group-b-streptococcus/patients.aspx<br />

http://www.groupbstrepinternational.org/<br />

http://www.marchofdimes.com/pregnancy/<br />

complications_groupb.html<br />

5


High Tech<br />

Testing Can Save<br />

Babies’ Lives<br />

illumigene ® <strong>GBS</strong><br />

test module<br />

Meet the new technology helping to improve the<br />

diagnosis of Group B Streptococcus, the most common<br />

cause of life-threatening infections in newborns.<br />

Sometimes new technologies are<br />

so obvious you can’t miss them:<br />

Smart phones and automatic flush<br />

toilets are hard not to notice. Other<br />

technologies tend to stay in the<br />

background, but that doesn’t mean<br />

they aren’t having profound effects<br />

on our lives. One such technology<br />

named illumigene ® <strong>GBS</strong> is a<br />

molecular assay to detect Group B<br />

Streptococcus (<strong>GBS</strong>) colonization<br />

in women. <strong>GBS</strong> can be transmitted<br />

from healthy moms to their babies<br />

during birth. <strong>GBS</strong> doesn’t harm the<br />

mothers, but it can kill a newborn<br />

within a few hours.<br />

Currently the majority of laboratories<br />

in the U.S are using a traditional<br />

culture method. The patient sample<br />

that you send to the laboratory is<br />

placed in a growth medium, and<br />

then streaked on to a culture plate.<br />

The plate is then examined to see<br />

if any bacteria are present. The<br />

problem with this test is that it lacks<br />

sensitivity, studies have shown<br />

sensitivity to be as low as 42%. 1<br />

Also the procedure is multi-step,<br />

cumbersome and time-consuming,<br />

and depends on subjective<br />

evaluation by lab technicians.<br />

A New Approach…<br />

Now, however, there is a new and<br />

improved way to test for <strong>GBS</strong>.<br />

Advances in molecular technology<br />

have made it possible to place the<br />

sample in an enrichment broth for as<br />

little as 18 hours, then go directly to<br />

assay testing to check for presence<br />

of <strong>GBS</strong>, providing a more definitive<br />

answer than traditional methods,<br />

explains Michael Jozefczyk, MD,<br />

president of ClearPath Diagnostics<br />

in Syracuse, New York. Molecular<br />

testing of this sort has certainly not<br />

replaced conventional diagnostics,<br />

but it has made more accurate<br />

results possible for a variety of tests,<br />

particularly <strong>GBS</strong>. illumigene ® <strong>GBS</strong><br />

is both faster and more sensitive,<br />

giving doctors and hospitals more<br />

confidence in the results.<br />

Childbirth is a natural part of life,<br />

and fortunately it usually goes well<br />

without a need for much high-tech<br />

intervention. But screening for <strong>GBS</strong><br />

with illumigene ® , even if done<br />

quietly and behind the scenes, can<br />

help mothers and doctors make sure<br />

that when babies arrive, they are<br />

free of the potentially deadly <strong>GBS</strong><br />

bacterium.<br />

––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––<br />

1. Fabien Rallue, et al. Sensitivities of Antigen<br />

Detection and PCR Assays Greatly <strong>Inc</strong>reased<br />

Compared to That of the Standard Culture Method<br />

for Screening for Group B Streptococcus Carriage<br />

in Pregnant Women. Journal of Clinical Microbiology,<br />

March 2006, p. 725-728.<br />

6


<strong>GBS</strong><strong>Answers</strong><br />

When Tests<br />

Get It Wrong<br />

There are few things more devastating than<br />

losing a child — especially when it could have<br />

been prevented. The tiny lives lost each year<br />

from infection with Group B Streptococcus<br />

can be saved by better screening and<br />

appropriate treatment.<br />

Group B Strep (<strong>GBS</strong>) is just one of<br />

the many bacterial communities that<br />

colonize a healthy adult. <strong>GBS</strong> bacteria<br />

live harmlessly in approximately 25<br />

percent of healthy women. However,<br />

when the bacteria are transmitted to<br />

a baby during birth, the newborn can<br />

become seriously ill.<br />

Negative Test,<br />

False Reassurance<br />

Stephanie Worthy was tested for<br />

<strong>GBS</strong> 33 weeks into her pregnancy<br />

and the test was negative. Her<br />

son, Jaxton, was born on the<br />

evening of December 7, 2011. He<br />

was completely healthy and sailed<br />

through all the newborn tests with<br />

high marks. Six hours later he<br />

was in neonatal intensive care for<br />

observation. Four days later he was<br />

dead. “They didn’t diagnose him<br />

[with <strong>GBS</strong>] for eight hours,” Worthy<br />

explains, presumably because her<br />

<strong>GBS</strong> test was negative.<br />

RaeAnne Latimore also tested<br />

negative for <strong>GBS</strong>, at 35 and a<br />

half weeks. Her son, Blake, was<br />

born at 5:30 in the afternoon of<br />

January 6, 2012, one month after<br />

Jaxton Worthy was born. At one<br />

o’clock the next morning Blake<br />

was making strange grunting<br />

sounds and Latimore couldn’t<br />

rouse him for feeding. She<br />

became concerned, but the nurse<br />

reassured her that the noises were<br />

normal. Latimore insisted that they<br />

look Blake over in the nursery.<br />

Half an hour later the doctor came<br />

in to tell Latimore that Blake was<br />

seriously ill. At 8:37 that morning,<br />

“our little fighter gave up his fight,”<br />

says Latimore. “They ruled out<br />

<strong>GBS</strong> because of my negative<br />

test,” she explains, but a nurse<br />

practitioner who had been on<br />

the team that tried to save him<br />

thought the symptoms looked like<br />

<strong>GBS</strong> and asked the pathologist to<br />

check for it in the autopsy.”<br />

She was right. <strong>GBS</strong> infection was<br />

the cause of Blake’s death. “Testing<br />

negative doesn’t mean you are<br />

negative,” warns Worthy.<br />

Better Tests<br />

“False negatives can be a problem,”<br />

explains Amanda Smith, medical<br />

technologist in the microbiology<br />

department at The Pathology Lab in<br />

Lake Charles, Louisiana. “We were<br />

researching why even with patients<br />

who were getting good prenatal care,<br />

mothers who tested negative were<br />

sometimes delivering babies that<br />

were infected,” says Smith. In January<br />

of this year, The Pathology Lab<br />

switched from the old culture-based<br />

test to the illumigene ® <strong>GBS</strong> test from<br />

<strong>Meridian</strong> <strong>Bioscience</strong>, <strong>Inc</strong>. because<br />

the molecular test is more sensitive,<br />

according to Smith. As more labs<br />

switch to the more sensitive molecular<br />

test, perhaps outcomes like Blake’s<br />

and Jaxton’s will become even more<br />

uncommon.<br />

7


Baby Born with Life-<br />

Threatening <strong>GBS</strong> Despite<br />

Testing Negative<br />

Although Crystal Mikos<br />

tested negative during<br />

pregnancy, her little<br />

boy was born with <strong>GBS</strong><br />

and a series of deadly<br />

complications. But this<br />

baby beat the odds.<br />

Crystal Mikos did everything right. Her pregnancy was perfectly normal.<br />

She was screened for Group B Strep (<strong>GBS</strong>) around 35-37 weeks, as<br />

recommended by the CDC, and tested negative. At 38 weeks, Mikos’<br />

doctor did a procedure called “stripping the membranes” (or sometimes<br />

“sweeping the membranes”) in an attempt to get her to go into labor. This<br />

technique, in which the doctor or midwife runs a finger gently around the<br />

bag of water to separate it from the uterus, is generally considered safe<br />

and is still sometimes used; but many physicians and midwives avoid it<br />

because it is yet another opportunity to introduce infection.<br />

8


<strong>GBS</strong><strong>Answers</strong><br />

A Host of<br />

Complications<br />

At 40 weeks, Mikos’ doctor induced<br />

labor. After 30 hours of labor, the baby’s<br />

heart rate plummeted and Mikos had<br />

to have an emergency C-section.<br />

“I only remember that when Anthony<br />

was born, I heard nothing — no<br />

crying, nothing. Then I passed out.”<br />

When she came to in recovery, her<br />

fiancé told her that the baby was in<br />

neonatal intensive care with major<br />

complications.<br />

As Mikos later learned, Anthony had<br />

many problems, including pneumonia,<br />

meconium aspiration syndrome,<br />

severe edema, and respiratory<br />

distress because the umbilical cord<br />

had been wrapped around his neck.<br />

But the most serious of the complications<br />

was <strong>GBS</strong>. Even though the <strong>GBS</strong><br />

screening test had come back negative,<br />

blood tests after he was born<br />

found <strong>GBS</strong> in little Anthony’s blood.<br />

Because of the many serious problems<br />

Anthony was dealing with,<br />

Mikos was told that if he lived, he<br />

might have brain damage, blindness<br />

or hearing loss.<br />

Anthony spent 17 excruciating days<br />

in NICU, but he survived. Now, almost<br />

two years later, he is a happy, healthy,<br />

perfectly normal toddler — no blindness,<br />

no hearing loss, no neurological<br />

problems. Excellent neonatal care<br />

and a lot of luck saved Anthony. But<br />

the screening test intended to prevent<br />

his ordeal did not.<br />

Be a Partner<br />

There is no way of knowing whether<br />

the membrane sweep introduced<br />

the bacteria after the negative <strong>GBS</strong><br />

test or if the test itself was faulty or<br />

perhaps misread. No medical test<br />

How to Help Protect<br />

Your Baby, Before and<br />

During Labor<br />

In addition to adhering to the<br />

CDC’s early-onset prevention<br />

strategy, Moms can take additional<br />

precautions to help protect<br />

their babies from Group B Strep.<br />

The two pillars of the Centers<br />

for Disease Control and Prevention’s<br />

recommendation to protect<br />

against early-onset <strong>GBS</strong> are to test<br />

all women during week 35 – 37 of<br />

In addition to asking your<br />

doctor about your <strong>GBS</strong> test,<br />

you should:<br />

• See your provider promptly<br />

for any symptoms of vaginal<br />

infection. Get a copy of all test<br />

results and keep them with you.<br />

• Take caution regarding<br />

invasive procedures.<br />

• Discuss the benefits vs.<br />

risks of possible methods of<br />

induction with your provider<br />

early in pregnancy as not all<br />

providers ask before “stripping”<br />

membranes.<br />

is 100 percent reliable and there are<br />

many ways to contract an infection.<br />

But there is a lot moms can do to<br />

improve the odds that their babies<br />

will be born healthy and stay healthy.<br />

“I know doctors get tired of patients<br />

coming in with information they’ve<br />

read on the Internet,” Mikos says.<br />

their pregnancy, and to administer<br />

antibiotics during labor to those<br />

who test positive.<br />

For the test, a swab will be used<br />

to collect a sample. According<br />

to CDC, about 25 percent of<br />

pregnant women are carriers of<br />

the bacteria and should be treated<br />

during delivery. Ask your doctor<br />

for illumigene ® <strong>GBS</strong>.<br />

• If you are having a planned<br />

C-section, talk to your provider<br />

about the risks vs. benefits of<br />

starting IV antibiotics well before<br />

your incision. C-sections may<br />

not completely prevent <strong>GBS</strong> infection,<br />

although the risk during<br />

a planned C-section is extremely<br />

low if performed before your<br />

labor starts/water breaks.<br />

The CDC says pregnant women<br />

who test positive or have had a<br />

previous infant with <strong>GBS</strong> should<br />

receive antibiotics through the vein<br />

during labor. This method is only<br />

effective during labor because the<br />

bacteria can grow back quickly.<br />

But she still recommends being an<br />

outspoken partner with your health<br />

care providers. Ask questions, get<br />

answers and do your homework. The<br />

more you know and the more input<br />

you provide, the better your chances<br />

of a happy outcome like the one Anthony<br />

and his parents enjoy.<br />

9


4 Facts<br />

About Group B Strep<br />

Group B Strep is the<br />

most common cause<br />

of life-threatening<br />

infections in newborns,<br />

so why haven’t<br />

you heard of it?<br />

Understand these<br />

four important facts<br />

about these naturallyoccurring<br />

bacteria.<br />

1<br />

Not all newborns<br />

exposed to <strong>GBS</strong><br />

become infected<br />

One in four pregnant women carry<br />

Group B Streptococcus (Group B Strep<br />

or <strong>GBS</strong>) in their digestive tract and birth<br />

canal, but not all newborns exposed<br />

to <strong>GBS</strong> are infected. Many Moms<br />

wonder why. Why are some babies just<br />

fine while others suffer from potentially<br />

deadly complications at the hands of the<br />

infection?<br />

Dr. Carol J. Baker, professor of pediatrics<br />

at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston<br />

explains that there are many potential<br />

answers to this question, but the main<br />

reason seems to be that some women<br />

have developed a natural immunity to<br />

<strong>GBS</strong>. “Your baby doesn’t get tetanus<br />

if you had the vaccine because your<br />

protection goes through the placenta to<br />

keep the baby well until he or she starts<br />

getting vaccinated,” she explains. “This<br />

analogy explains what happens with<br />

<strong>GBS</strong>. We don’t know which women are<br />

protected, but some have developed<br />

immunity naturally and they pass that<br />

along to the baby.”<br />

2<br />

Although the<br />

bacteria is usually<br />

harmless to Moms,<br />

it can cause deadly<br />

infections in babies<br />

Although the naturally occurring bacteria<br />

is usually harmless to the mother, it is the<br />

most common cause of life-threatening<br />

infections in newborns, according to<br />

the U.S. Centers for Disease Control<br />

and Prevention (CDC). <strong>GBS</strong> can cause<br />

sepsis, pneumonia or even meningitis.<br />

It can also cause babies to be stillborn,<br />

miscarried or so sick they die after birth.<br />

3<br />

Women who<br />

test positive for<br />

<strong>GBS</strong> usually have no<br />

symptoms.<br />

A woman who tests positive for <strong>GBS</strong><br />

usually does not have any symptoms,<br />

thus the importance of routine testing.<br />

“The good news is, <strong>GBS</strong> disease is highly<br />

preventable,” explains Marti Perhach,<br />

executive director, CEO and co-founder<br />

of Group B Strep International. She lost<br />

her baby girl to <strong>GBS</strong> in 1998.<br />

“If the mom is tested between weeks 35<br />

and 37, as recommended by CDC, and<br />

found to be positive, she should be given<br />

IV antibiotics for <strong>GBS</strong> during labor and<br />

delivery. However, my daughter, Rose,<br />

was stillborn fullterm because <strong>GBS</strong> had<br />

already infected her amniotic fluid and<br />

lungs before I could get my IV antibiotics.”<br />

4<br />

Group B Strep is<br />

different than strep<br />

throat and does not<br />

only affect pregnant<br />

women.<br />

<strong>GBS</strong> is not strep throat, which is caused<br />

by group A strep, and it can affect<br />

people of all ages, especially those with<br />

compromised immune systems.<br />

10


4 Tips<br />

<strong>GBS</strong><strong>Answers</strong><br />

For Moms Who Test Positive For <strong>GBS</strong><br />

Most Moms who test<br />

positive for Group B<br />

Strep will give birth<br />

to perfectly healthy<br />

babies, but that doesn’t<br />

mean they shouldn’t<br />

takes steps to protect<br />

their newborns from<br />

potentially serious<br />

illness, or even death.<br />

Doctors and real moms<br />

come together to<br />

share their best tips<br />

for handling a <strong>GBS</strong><br />

diagnosis.<br />

1<br />

Maintain an open dialogue<br />

with your doctor<br />

“My best tip for a woman who has tested<br />

positive is to discuss that result with her<br />

obstetrician,” says Dr. Carol J. Baker,<br />

professor of pediatrics at Baylor College<br />

of Medicine in Houston and executive<br />

director, Center for Vaccine Awareness &<br />

Research, Texas Children’s Hospital.<br />

Dr. Baker also advises women to have<br />

a clear plan for what will happen once<br />

they go into labor, and to be sure to be<br />

honest with their health care professionals.<br />

“People worry during pregnancy,”<br />

she says. “They wonder, ‘Am I eating<br />

the wrong thing? Am I drinking the right<br />

thing?’ The overwhelming majority of<br />

babies will be healthy whether they carry<br />

Group B Strep or not, so on one hand, I<br />

tell women not to worry; but on the other<br />

hand, if you want to know more—ask!”<br />

Think of the medical professionals you’ve<br />

surrounded yourself with as teammates<br />

in the quest for a happy, healthy birth.<br />

Trust them, of course, but don’t be afraid<br />

to seek second opinions, ask questions<br />

and do your own research.<br />

Support groups, both in-person and<br />

online, can bring comfort in community,<br />

and there are a plethora of reliable online<br />

resources, such as the CDC’s website—just<br />

make sure you’re turning to a<br />

trustworthy source.<br />

2<br />

Go to the hospital as<br />

soon as labor starts<br />

The sooner you get to the hospital, the<br />

sooner you can begin your antibiotic<br />

treatment (which should be administered<br />

intravenously). “Antibiotics to<br />

prevent <strong>GBS</strong> disease work best if given<br />

4 or more hours before the birth of the<br />

baby. Arriving to the hospital when labor<br />

is starting maximizes the chances that<br />

women can get this effective treatment<br />

in time,” explains Jonathan M. Wortham,<br />

MD, Epidemic Intelligence Service Officer<br />

for the Center for Disease Control, has<br />

taken care of extremely ill infants with<br />

<strong>GBS</strong> disease<br />

Of the mothers who test positive for <strong>GBS</strong><br />

and are treated with antibiotics in labor,<br />

the risk of infection drops from 1 in 200<br />

babies to 1 in 4,000.<br />

3<br />

Remind the hospital<br />

staff that you tested<br />

positive for <strong>GBS</strong> bacteria.<br />

Remember tip one? Trust your medical<br />

team, but you’re in charge of your own<br />

health. Don’t assume everyone has seen<br />

your files. Speak up and remind everyone<br />

you talk to, nurses included, that you<br />

tested positive for <strong>GBS</strong> bacteria, even if<br />

you think they already know.<br />

“We have a status card we give to Mom<br />

if she tests positive, just in case the results<br />

aren’t at the hospital in time for the<br />

delivery,” says Marti Perhach, executive<br />

director, CEO and co-founder of Group B<br />

Strep International. “She can show the<br />

card and expedite getting the IV antibiotics.<br />

She should also be sure to alert the<br />

nursing staff as soon as labor starts or<br />

her water breaks.”<br />

If you’re allergic to any medications, such<br />

as Penicillin, note that right away, too.<br />

4<br />

Ask your provider<br />

to not strip your<br />

membranes<br />

“The reason for that recommendation is<br />

that stripping the membranes can allow<br />

the bacteria to get closer to the baby,”<br />

explains Dr. Baker.<br />

11


WHAT’S MISSING?<br />

You may not feel sick or have any symptoms, but approximately<br />

25% of expectant mothers unknowingly carry Group B Streptococcus<br />

(<strong>GBS</strong>). Without proper treatment during labor, <strong>GBS</strong> can infect<br />

newborns with sepsis, pneumonia, and even meningitis.<br />

Screening for <strong>GBS</strong> at 35-37 weeks of pregnancy is a simple<br />

and painless way to protect your baby’s health against<br />

serious <strong>GBS</strong>-related infections.<br />

Ask your doctor to test you for <strong>GBS</strong> with illumigene ® —<br />

so you and your baby don’t miss a thing together.<br />

meridianbioscience.com/findwhatsmissing

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!