- Page 1 and 2: Australasian Language Technology As
- Page 3 and 4: ALTA 2012 Workshop Committees Works
- Page 5 and 6: ALTA 2012 Programme The proceedings
- Page 7: Contents Invited talks 1 Using a la
- Page 11 and 12: Diverse Words, Shared Meanings: Sta
- Page 13 and 14: A Citation Centric Annotation Schem
- Page 15 and 16: The structure of this paper is as f
- Page 17 and 18: understanding of sentences surround
- Page 19 and 20: henceforth referred to as Annotator
- Page 21 and 22: References Angrosh, M A, Cranefield
- Page 23 and 24: Semantic Judgement of Medical Conce
- Page 25 and 26: 2012). The TE model provides a form
- Page 27 and 28: Correlation coefficient with human
- Page 29 and 30: Pair # Concept 1 Doc. Freq. Concept
- Page 31 and 32: Active Learning and the Irish Treeb
- Page 33 and 34: 2.2 Sources of annotator disagreeme
- Page 35 and 36: complement (csubj) 2 . See Figure 4
- Page 37 and 38: top Y trees from this ordered set a
- Page 39 and 40: References Ron Artstein and Massimo
- Page 41 and 42: Unsupervised Estimation of Word Usa
- Page 43 and 44: not lend itself to determining unsu
- Page 45 and 46: T 0: think, want, thing, look, tell
- Page 47 and 48: correlation is much stronger than t
- Page 49 and 50: References Eneko Agirre and Philip
- Page 51 and 52: eaders with sentences with a negati
- Page 53 and 54: Question Which word is closest in m
- Page 55 and 56: Acceptability and negativity: conce
- Page 57 and 58: MORE NEGATIVE / LESS NEGATIVE MR Δ
- Page 59 and 60:
Julie Elizabeth Weeds. 2003. Measur
- Page 61 and 62:
cation produced by a supervised mac
- Page 63 and 64:
understood to carry a lower weight
- Page 65 and 66:
Figure 1: Average classification ac
- Page 67 and 68:
0.8 0.75 0.7 AuthorA4 AuthorB4 Auth
- Page 69 and 70:
Segmentation and Translation of Jap
- Page 71 and 72:
tomatosōsu “tomato sauce”, rev
- Page 73 and 74:
“markup” and “Mach”, so the
- Page 75 and 76:
MWE Segmentation Possible Translati
- Page 77 and 78:
English Term Pairs from Search Engi
- Page 79 and 80:
techniques used are, of necessity,
- Page 81 and 82:
ation metrics robust, if they are v
- Page 83 and 84:
Figure 2: Methodologies of human as
- Page 85 and 86:
an optimal method? Machine translat
- Page 87 and 88:
Towards Two-step Multi-document Sum
- Page 89 and 90:
archical and non-hierarchical relat
- Page 91 and 92:
We use the MetaMap 7 tool to automa
- Page 93 and 94:
T T & C CC z -1.5 -1.27 -1.33 p-val
- Page 95 and 96:
References Alan R. Aronson. 2001. E
- Page 97 and 98:
techniques and results are shown. F
- Page 99 and 100:
Rock Hip-Hop Electronic Punk Metal
- Page 101 and 102:
Rank Frequency Frequency (filtered)
- Page 103 and 104:
Ex. 1 Ex. 2 Ex. 3 Score Song Title
- Page 105 and 106:
Free-text input vs menu selection:
- Page 107 and 108:
consistent with the much earlier ed
- Page 109 and 110:
3.2 Dialogue system architecture Th
- Page 111 and 112:
Control Free-text Menu-based n=119
- Page 113 and 114:
tions in analyzing algebra example
- Page 115 and 116:
langid.py for better language model
- Page 117 and 118:
documents of MIME type text/html wi
- Page 119 and 120:
Acknowledgments NICTA is funded by
- Page 121 and 122:
LaBB-CAT: an Annotation Store Rober
- Page 123 and 124:
elationship between the coincidence
- Page 125 and 126:
Communication 33 (special issue on
- Page 127 and 128:
matically extracting location infor
- Page 129 and 130:
Classifier DBp:1R Geo:1R D+G:1R DBp
- Page 131 and 132:
ALTA Shared Task papers 123
- Page 133 and 134:
All Struct. Unstruct. Total - Abstr
- Page 135 and 136:
System Population Intervention Back
- Page 137 and 138:
tence positions (absolute and relat
- Page 139 and 140:
sitional attributes, and sequential
- Page 141 and 142:
ordering labels, All includes BOW,
- Page 143 and 144:
3 Software Used All experimentation
- Page 145 and 146:
Combination Output Public Private C
- Page 147 and 148:
Experiments with Clustering-based F
- Page 149 and 150:
3 Results For the initial experimen