02.05.2015 Views

GUNS Magazine January 1960 - Jeffersonian

GUNS Magazine January 1960 - Jeffersonian

GUNS Magazine January 1960 - Jeffersonian

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

LOOKING<br />

LONG<br />

FOR<br />

NGE<br />

EFFICIENCY<br />

in aSporter?<br />

~~e'1<br />

III/ Model! .<br />

I<br />

One<br />

Caliber!<br />

O~e L.... OW<br />

PrIce!<br />

I·~,<br />

---,<br />

,I<br />

NORMA 7 x 61 SHARPE &<br />

HART CARTRIDGES loaded to<br />

our specifications are sold exclusively<br />

throuqh Sharpe & Hart Associates<br />

dealers in the U. S.. Canada and Alaska.<br />

Primers are of the American type and are<br />

non~corrosiveand non·mercuric. 160-qrain,<br />

pointed soft-point boallall bullet at a<br />

muzzle velocity of 3100 f.s. and averaqe<br />

pressure of 51.730 pounds.<br />

See your Dealer or order direct.<br />

THE SHARPE &HART ASSOCIATES, INC.<br />

EMMITSBURC 3. MD.<br />

NOTES ON KILLING POWER<br />

AT LEAST SINCE 1912, when the Savage<br />

.t\. Arms Corp. came out with Charles<br />

Newton's revolutionary .22 High Power,<br />

there has been a more or less continuous<br />

argument regarding the relative merits of<br />

high-velocity, small bore bullets and comparatively<br />

slow bullets of greater weight and<br />

calibre. Men of unquestioned integrity and<br />

experience have advocated projectiles of both<br />

types; and many a camp fire has been kept<br />

burning far into the night by sportsmen who<br />

have felt violently on the subject, one way<br />

or the other. Having killed my share of<br />

game in the United States, Canada, Mexico,<br />

and Africa, I am of the sincere opinion that<br />

both factions are right-and that both factions<br />

can be wrong, depending upon conditions.<br />

It might be well to consider just what it is<br />

that kills an animal. Insofar as firearms are<br />

concerned, the thing which kills game is a<br />

bullet which destroys certain vital organs<br />

upon which the life of the animal depends.<br />

Placement of the shot is by far the most<br />

important factor involved. This factor is controlled<br />

entirely by the ability of the hunter,<br />

and there is no substitute for it. There can<br />

be no great argument about this among<br />

thinking sportsmen. The arguments arise in<br />

connection with the best equipment with<br />

which to achieve this objective; and this is<br />

governed by many varying conditions.<br />

In my experience, I have always found<br />

that a high-velocity bullet which actually<br />

reaches a vital area kills far more rapidly<br />

than a slow one regardless of calibre or<br />

weight. I am, therefore, a high-velocity advocate<br />

under conditions where it is reasonable<br />

to assume that such a bullet can and<br />

will reach such an area. Unfortunately, there<br />

are many circumstances wherein such an assumption<br />

would be a monumental error leading<br />

to total misses, wounded game and, quite<br />

conceivably, to actual danger to the hunter.<br />

It seems to me that, among other things<br />

which must be considered, there are the<br />

questions of the size of the animal, the probable<br />

range at which the average shot will be<br />

Laken, the characteristics of the terrain, and<br />

the potential ability of the animal to inflict<br />

damage on the hunter. If, for example, the<br />

desired trophy is a soft-skinned animal<br />

weighing 500 pounds or less, found customarily<br />

in open country where long range<br />

shots are the rule, then a man is justified in<br />

choosing a very accurate, 'scope sighted rifle<br />

of very high velocity. Such a rifle, because<br />

of its accuracy, flatness of trajectory, and<br />

efficiency of sighting arrangements will materially<br />

contribute to a hunter's ability to<br />

pIace his bullet in a vital area.<br />

If, on the other hand, your game is something<br />

on the order of elk as to size, and if<br />

you will be hunting in thick timber, such a<br />

choice would hardly be a happy one. In the<br />

first place, it is probable that you will have<br />

By R. F. CHATFIELD-TAYLOR<br />

to shoot through some brush. In the second<br />

place, it is most likely that your only target<br />

will be the south end of a northbound beast_<br />

Under these conditions, a high-velocity,<br />

spitzer bullet is just about the worst medicine<br />

imaginable, since of all types its performance<br />

is the most unpredictable in heavy<br />

brush. The only guaranteed prediction is that<br />

you cannot predict. Both velocity and spitzer<br />

points mitigate against reliable bullet performance<br />

in brush and, therefore, one would<br />

be wise to choose a relatively large-bore rifle<br />

throwing a round-nosed bullet at not over<br />

2400 ft. secs. and preferably a bit less.<br />

In Africa, one finds just about every condition<br />

conceivable, as well as every size of<br />

game from dik-dik to elephant. The more<br />

experienced white hunters are quite willing,<br />

even anxious, to see you use a flat shooting,<br />

high-velocity weapon on much of the plains<br />

game, since well placed shots on that type<br />

of game are almost always instantly fatal and<br />

since it is easier to make well placed shots<br />

with that kind of rifle over long and unknown<br />

ranges. When, however, the shooting<br />

is done in heavy bush, when the bigger species<br />

such as eland, roan, sable, greater kudu<br />

and zebra are involved or, m(}st particularly,<br />

if the game is of the dangerous variety,<br />

then the white hunters deplore the use of<br />

small-bore, high-velocity rifles and have<br />

been largely responsible for the current laws<br />

in British East Africa prohibiting their use<br />

on dangerous game. There is far too great an<br />

element of chance. A light, fast bullet may<br />

not get through the brush; if it does, it may<br />

be deflected to a non-vital area; and it may<br />

not penetrate through heavy bone and muscle<br />

even if it does strike the proper region. This<br />

is altogether too many "ifs" even for nondangerous<br />

game. For elephant, rhino, buffalo,<br />

and lion, such a rifle is, in my opinion,<br />

unthinkable.<br />

Two extremely experienced hunters have<br />

developed tables of killing power. They may<br />

not give all the answers, but they are very<br />

good yardsticks. Elmer Keith uses a system<br />

based upon what he calls "pounds-feet."<br />

John Taylor, if I am not mistaken, calls his<br />

"K-O Values." Both systems are based upon<br />

bullet weight and velocity, with the accent on<br />

bullet weight. Both of these men are experts,<br />

with lifetimes of experience in the<br />

field, and their comments should not be<br />

taken lightly_ These tables may be found in<br />

Keith's excellent "Rifles for Large Game"<br />

and in Taylor's "African Rifles and Cartridges."<br />

For some time I have been concerned with<br />

another factor which neither Keith nor<br />

Taylor include in their tables, although both<br />

authors make abundant mention of it elsewhere<br />

in their books. This is the question of<br />

sectional density, the formula for which is<br />

W/d 2 wbere W is the weight of the bullet in<br />

(Continued on page 59)<br />

12 <strong>GUNS</strong> JANUARY <strong>1960</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!