03.05.2015 Views

Perspectives on Patient Safety and Strategies for Error Reduction

Perspectives on Patient Safety and Strategies for Error Reduction

Perspectives on Patient Safety and Strategies for Error Reduction

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches to <strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Ellen L. Bart<strong>on</strong>, J.D., CPCU, DFASHRM<br />

Risk Management C<strong>on</strong>sultant<br />

1<br />

<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches to <strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Part I: Medical <strong>Error</strong> Scenarios <strong>and</strong><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Perspectives</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Ellen L. Bart<strong>on</strong>, J.D., CPCU, DFASHRM<br />

Risk Management C<strong>on</strong>sultant<br />

2<br />

1


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Part I: Overview<br />

• Extent of the Problem<br />

• Systems Thinking<br />

• Success Stories in <strong>Safety</strong><br />

• <strong>Error</strong> Reporting <strong>and</strong> Analysis<br />

• Root Cause Analysis<br />

• Designing Systems<br />

• <strong>Safety</strong> Improvement Initiatives<br />

3<br />

• 53-year-old male<br />

• History:<br />

Scenarios<br />

Wr<strong>on</strong>g Site Surgery<br />

– diabetes<br />

– stroke<br />

– drug-resistant staphylococcus aureus infecti<strong>on</strong><br />

– leg ulcers<br />

– heart failure<br />

• Admitted <strong>for</strong> treatment of bilateral leg<br />

ulcerati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>and</strong> cellulitis<br />

4<br />

2


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Scenarios<br />

Wr<strong>on</strong>g Site Surgery<br />

• Unresp<strong>on</strong>sive to treatment (Tx)<br />

• Developed distal ischemia bilaterally<br />

– worse in the right lower extremity<br />

– gangrene in the right lower extremity<br />

• Surgery scheduled<br />

– below-the-knee amputati<strong>on</strong><br />

– right side<br />

5<br />

Scenarios<br />

Wr<strong>on</strong>g Site Surgery<br />

• Surgical prep:<br />

– surge<strong>on</strong> marked RLE with an “X”<br />

• At time of surgery:<br />

– RLE was covered<br />

– LLE was draped <strong>for</strong> surgery<br />

6<br />

3


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Scenarios<br />

Wr<strong>on</strong>g Site Surgery<br />

• Surge<strong>on</strong>’s perspective:<br />

– thought he had marked the appropriate limb<br />

preoperatively<br />

– did not find the “X” <strong>on</strong> the left limb, <strong>and</strong> the right<br />

limb was covered<br />

• Surge<strong>on</strong> proceeded with below-the-knee<br />

amputati<strong>on</strong> of the LLE<br />

7<br />

Scenarios<br />

Wr<strong>on</strong>g Site Surgery<br />

• <strong>Error</strong> discovered postoperatively<br />

• <strong>Patient</strong> underwent a below-the-knee<br />

amputati<strong>on</strong> of RLE<br />

– patient became a double amputee<br />

WHAT REALLY WENT WRONG?<br />

8<br />

4


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Scenarios<br />

The Sign-out<br />

• 83-year-old hypertensive woman<br />

– arrhythmia<br />

– recent pacemaker placement<br />

• Hospitalized <strong>for</strong> fatigue <strong>and</strong> shortness<br />

of breath<br />

• Evaluated <strong>for</strong> heart failure, myocardial<br />

infarcti<strong>on</strong>, <strong>and</strong> arrhythmia<br />

9<br />

Scenarios<br />

The Sign-out<br />

• <strong>Patient</strong>’s primary care physician (PCP) <strong>and</strong><br />

cardiologist were off<br />

• Covering physicians made rounds <strong>and</strong> discharged<br />

the patient<br />

– PCP ordered discharge <strong>and</strong> prescribed Lopressor ®<br />

(metoprolol)<br />

– cardiologist examined patient <strong>and</strong> prescribed Toprol XL ®<br />

(metoprolol)<br />

– Resident prescribed amiodar<strong>on</strong>e <strong>and</strong> digoxin<br />

• Each physician was not aware of the prescripti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

written by the others<br />

• Time pressures <strong>on</strong> the floor<br />

– nurse did not go over prescripti<strong>on</strong>s with patient<br />

10<br />

5


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Key Definiti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

ADVERSE EVENT<br />

an injury caused by<br />

medical management<br />

ERROR<br />

failure of a planned acti<strong>on</strong><br />

to be completed as intended<br />

or use of a wr<strong>on</strong>g plan<br />

to achieve an aim<br />

AE<br />

PAE<br />

ERROR<br />

PREVENTABLE ADVERSE EVENT<br />

an adverse event caused by error<br />

11<br />

Extent of the Problem<br />

Estimated Impact of Medical <strong>Error</strong>s<br />

• 44,000–98,000 deaths per year<br />

• Potential underestimate or overestimate<br />

• Medicati<strong>on</strong> errors are especially prevalent<br />

Source: Institute of Medicine 2000.<br />

12<br />

6


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Federal M<strong>and</strong>ates <strong>for</strong><br />

Quality Improvement<br />

1997: Advisory Commissi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> C<strong>on</strong>sumer Protecti<strong>on</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> Quality in the Health Care Industry<br />

1998: Advisory Commissi<strong>on</strong> cites quality problems<br />

– avoidable errors<br />

– underutilizati<strong>on</strong> of services<br />

– overuse of services<br />

– variati<strong>on</strong> in services<br />

1998: Quality Interagency Coordinati<strong>on</strong> (QuIC) Task<br />

Force focuses <strong>on</strong> medical error research<br />

13<br />

1999: The 1 st IOM Report<br />

To Err is Human<br />

• The challenge<br />

– reduce medical errors by 50% in five years<br />

• The call to acti<strong>on</strong><br />

– n<strong>on</strong>-punitive error reporting systems<br />

– legislati<strong>on</strong> <strong>for</strong> peer review protecti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

– per<strong>for</strong>mance st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>for</strong> safety assurance<br />

– visible commitments to safety improvement<br />

– attenti<strong>on</strong> to medicati<strong>on</strong> safety<br />

Source: Institute of Medicine 2000.<br />

14<br />

7


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

2001: The 2 nd IOM Report<br />

Crossing the Quality Chasm<br />

• <strong>Safety</strong> is a key dimensi<strong>on</strong> of quality<br />

• Systems approach to safety<br />

improvement<br />

– simply trying harder will not work<br />

– stepwise correcti<strong>on</strong> of problems in the<br />

system is the key to success<br />

– overcome the culture of blame <strong>and</strong> shame:<br />

Human error is to be expected!<br />

Source: Institute of Medicine 2001.<br />

15<br />

Quality health care is...<br />

• SAFE<br />

• Effective<br />

• <strong>Patient</strong>-centered<br />

• Timely<br />

• Efficient<br />

• Equitable<br />

Source: Institute of Medicine 2001.<br />

16<br />

8


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Pathophysiology of <strong>Error</strong><br />

Human Factors<br />

• Slips, lapses<br />

– triggered by interrupti<strong>on</strong>s, fatigue, time pressures,<br />

anger, anxiety, fear, boredom, etc.<br />

• Mistakes<br />

– result from a wr<strong>on</strong>g plan of acti<strong>on</strong><br />

– involve misinterpretati<strong>on</strong> of problem, lack of<br />

knowledge, habitual patterns of thought<br />

Sources: Reas<strong>on</strong> J. Human <strong>Error</strong>, 1990<br />

Leape L, <strong>Error</strong> in Medicine, JAMA 1994.<br />

17<br />

Two Ends of Health Care Systems<br />

PATIENT<br />

Sharp<br />

End<br />

• Practiti<strong>on</strong>ers<br />

• Tools of the Trade<br />

• Physical Infrastructure<br />

• Health Plans, Payers...<br />

Blunt<br />

End<br />

• State M<strong>and</strong>ates, Regs...<br />

• Federal M<strong>and</strong>ates, Regs…<br />

18<br />

9


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Life at the Sharp End<br />

TRIGGER<br />

(wr<strong>on</strong>g drug prescribed)<br />

1 st Defense<br />

(distracted nurse)<br />

2 nd Defense<br />

(pharmacy)<br />

3 rd Defense<br />

(vigilant nurse)<br />

Adverse Event Averted<br />

Sources: Reas<strong>on</strong> J Human error: Models <strong>and</strong> Management, BMJ, 18<br />

March 2000. Cook R. University of Chicago, 1991-99.<br />

Latent failure<br />

(understaffing)<br />

Latent failure<br />

(no Rx tracking)<br />

Latent failure<br />

(understaffing)<br />

19<br />

Life at the Sharp End<br />

TRIGGER<br />

(wr<strong>on</strong>g drug prescribed)<br />

1 st Defense<br />

(distracted nurse)<br />

2 nd Defense<br />

(pharmacy)<br />

3 rd Defense<br />

(another distracted nurse)<br />

Latent failure<br />

(understaffing)<br />

Latent failure<br />

(no Rx tracking)<br />

Latent failure<br />

(understaffing)<br />

EVENT<br />

20<br />

10


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Life at the Sharp End<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ardized approaches can reduce variability <strong>and</strong><br />

improve system efficiency<br />

TRIGGER<br />

(wr<strong>on</strong>g drug prescribed)<br />

1 st Defense<br />

Template<br />

Adverse Event Averted<br />

21<br />

Where Are Latent Failures in Office-<br />

Based Practice?<br />

New patient in<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong><br />

Complaint/physical exam<br />

Diagnosis<br />

Treatment<br />

Referral<br />

Prescripti<strong>on</strong><br />

• Incomplete in<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong><br />

• Understaffing<br />

• Distracti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

• <strong>Patient</strong> n<strong>on</strong>participati<strong>on</strong><br />

• Communicati<strong>on</strong> skills<br />

• Transcultural issues<br />

• In<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong> systems<br />

• Medicati<strong>on</strong> errors<br />

• Tracking <strong>and</strong> follow-up<br />

22<br />

11


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Health Care vs. Aviati<strong>on</strong><br />

Similarities<br />

• Complex, inherently hazardous<br />

• Exacting per<strong>for</strong>mance requirements<br />

Differences<br />

• Higher preventable incident rates<br />

• Most incidents are less visible<br />

– errors often go undetected<br />

• Professi<strong>on</strong>al interacti<strong>on</strong>s are not st<strong>and</strong>ardized<br />

23<br />

Aviati<strong>on</strong>: A Success Story in<br />

<strong>Safety</strong><br />

Aviati<strong>on</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> Reporting System (ASRS)<br />

• Funded by the FAA, administered by NASA<br />

• Focuses <strong>on</strong> preventi<strong>on</strong><br />

• Entails collecti<strong>on</strong>, analysis, <strong>and</strong> resp<strong>on</strong>se to<br />

aviati<strong>on</strong> safety incident reports<br />

– reports are submitted voluntarily<br />

– includes <strong>on</strong>ly near misses<br />

– analysis <strong>and</strong> resp<strong>on</strong>se are key to improvement<br />

24<br />

12


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Anesthesiology: A Success<br />

Story in <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Anesthesia <strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> Foundati<strong>on</strong> (APSF)<br />

• Dramatic reducti<strong>on</strong> in anesthesia-related deaths<br />

– from 1/10,000 in early 1980s to 1/200,000 today<br />

• Raised awareness <strong>and</strong> culture of safety<br />

• Technological advances are a part (e.g. pulse<br />

oximeters, capnometers, 0 2 analyzers)<br />

• Simulators<br />

• Benefits to practiti<strong>on</strong>ers<br />

– anesthesiologists used to pay $30,000/year <strong>for</strong><br />

malpractice insurance; now they pay<br />

$5,000–$10,000/year<br />

Source: Guadagnino C (Interview with Dr. Ellis<strong>on</strong> Pierce) 2000.<br />

25<br />

VA: A Success Story in <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Veterans Health Administrati<strong>on</strong><br />

• Bar-coding of medicati<strong>on</strong> systems<br />

– reduced medicati<strong>on</strong> errors by two-thirds<br />

– in place at all VA facilities<br />

• Surgical Quality Improvement Program<br />

– 10% reducti<strong>on</strong> in mortality<br />

– 30% reducti<strong>on</strong> in post-op complicati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

Source: Department of Veterans Affairs 1999.<br />

26<br />

13


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Current Reporting Systems<br />

• Complex<br />

• Duplicative<br />

– Joint Commissi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> Accreditati<strong>on</strong> of Health<br />

Care Organizati<strong>on</strong>s, Department of Public<br />

Health, Medical Board<br />

• Focus <strong>on</strong> sentinel events<br />

• May be discoverable<br />

• In the absence of tort re<strong>for</strong>m will not work<br />

27<br />

Root Cause Analysis (JCAHO)<br />

What Happened?<br />

• Details of the sentinel event<br />

Failure Mode Analysis<br />

• Why did it happen?<br />

– proximal cause<br />

• Under what circumstances?<br />

– potential root causes<br />

Risk Reducti<strong>on</strong> <strong>Strategies</strong><br />

• Acti<strong>on</strong> plan to prevent recurrence<br />

Source: http://www.jcaho.org<br />

28<br />

14


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Underst<strong>and</strong>ing the Current<br />

System<br />

<strong>Error</strong> reporting al<strong>on</strong>e is not enough<br />

• Tendency to focus <strong>on</strong> individuals, not the system<br />

• Proximal causes happen at the sharp end<br />

– hindsight bias (20-20 visi<strong>on</strong>) — observati<strong>on</strong>s not<br />

apparent be<strong>for</strong>e or during the event<br />

– d<strong>on</strong>’t swat mosquitoes, drain the swamp<br />

• Complex systems harbor latent failures<br />

– elements can operate in an unintended or<br />

undesirable manner<br />

– Murphy’s Law applies<br />

29<br />

Designing Systems <strong>for</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

• Simplify processes<br />

– reduce h<strong>and</strong>-offs<br />

– make workplace user-friendly<br />

• Reduce variati<strong>on</strong><br />

– st<strong>and</strong>ardize processes<br />

– reduce reliance <strong>on</strong> memory <strong>and</strong> vigilance<br />

• Collaborate <strong>and</strong> improve communicati<strong>on</strong><br />

– physicians, nurses, NPs, PAs, pharmacists...<br />

– patients <strong>and</strong> their families<br />

30<br />

15


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Automati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> In<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong><br />

Technology (IT) Systems<br />

Benefits<br />

• Incorporate templates<br />

– Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE)<br />

eliminates h<strong>and</strong>writing errors<br />

• drug interacti<strong>on</strong>/duplicate Rx alerts<br />

• Facilitate tracking <strong>and</strong> follow-up<br />

• Streamline communicati<strong>on</strong>s am<strong>on</strong>g<br />

practiti<strong>on</strong>ers <strong>and</strong> with patients<br />

• Simplify <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ardize record-keeping<br />

practices<br />

31<br />

Automati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> IT Systems<br />

Barriers<br />

• M<strong>on</strong>ey<br />

• Learning curve<br />

• St<strong>and</strong>ardizati<strong>on</strong> of IT systems<br />

• <strong>Patient</strong> privacy<br />

• Resistance to change<br />

32<br />

16


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Medicati<strong>on</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> Programs<br />

MedWatch (FDA)<br />

• M<strong>and</strong>atory postmarketing surveillance <strong>for</strong><br />

drug <strong>and</strong> device manufacturers<br />

Nati<strong>on</strong>al ePrescribing <strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Initiative (NEPSI)<br />

• Joint $100 M, 5-year project funded by several<br />

major technology companies.<br />

• Free to every physician in the USA<br />

http://www.nati<strong>on</strong>alerx.com/<br />

33<br />

Medicati<strong>on</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> Programs<br />

Medicati<strong>on</strong> <strong>Error</strong>s Reporting Program (MER)<br />

• C<strong>on</strong>ducted by the U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP) <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Institute <strong>for</strong> Safe Medicati<strong>on</strong> Practices (ISMP)<br />

• Voluntary reports (ph<strong>on</strong>e, mail, Internet) from fr<strong>on</strong>tline<br />

practiti<strong>on</strong>ers<br />

• Reports shared with FDA <strong>and</strong> pharmaceutical<br />

manufacturers<br />

• MER-TM (transfusi<strong>on</strong> medicine) reports are deidentified<br />

34<br />

17


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Prescribing <strong>Safety</strong> Programs<br />

MedMARx (USP)<br />

• An<strong>on</strong>ymous, voluntary reports (via Internet)<br />

• For hospitals’ internal use<br />

• Includes RCA <strong>for</strong>ms <strong>for</strong> c<strong>on</strong>venience<br />

– not integrated with JCAHO database<br />

35<br />

Nati<strong>on</strong>wide <strong>Safety</strong> Initiatives<br />

•• Institute <strong>for</strong> Safe Medicati<strong>on</strong> Practices (ISMP)<br />

http://www.ismp.org<br />

•• The Leapfrog Group http://www.leapfroggroup.org<br />

•• Joint Commissi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> Accreditati<strong>on</strong> of of Healthcare<br />

Organizati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

http://www.jcaho.org<br />

•• Nati<strong>on</strong>al Center <strong>for</strong> <strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> (NCPS -- VA)<br />

http://www.va.gov/ncps<br />

•• Institute <strong>for</strong> Healthcare Improvement<br />

http://www.ihi.org<br />

•• Nati<strong>on</strong>al <strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> Foundati<strong>on</strong> http://www.npsf.org<br />

36<br />

18


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

The Leapfrog Group<br />

• Large, self-insured employers<br />

• Market incentives to reward delivery of<br />

high-quality health care<br />

• Three initiatives underway<br />

– evidence-based referral<br />

– ICU staffing <strong>and</strong> resp<strong>on</strong>se<br />

– Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE)<br />

37<br />

A Few Simple Rules <strong>for</strong> Health<br />

Care in the 21st Century<br />

Current Approach<br />

• Do no harm is an<br />

individual resp<strong>on</strong>sibility<br />

• In<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong> is a record<br />

• Secrecy is necessary<br />

• The system reacts to<br />

needs<br />

• Professi<strong>on</strong>al aut<strong>on</strong>omy<br />

drives variability<br />

New Approach<br />

• <strong>Safety</strong> is a system<br />

property<br />

• Knowledge is shared <strong>and</strong><br />

in<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong> flows freely<br />

• Transparency is necessary<br />

• Needs are anticipated<br />

• Decisi<strong>on</strong>-making is<br />

evidence-based<br />

Source: Institute of Medicine 2001<br />

38<br />

19


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Part I — C<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong><br />

• M<strong>and</strong>ate to reduce medical errors<br />

• Systems thinking is the key<br />

• Successful in other complex systems<br />

• <strong>Error</strong> reporting <strong>and</strong> analysis<br />

– can uncover latent system failures<br />

– potential <strong>for</strong> improvement<br />

• Some improvement initiatives underway<br />

39<br />

<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches to <strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Part II: Medicati<strong>on</strong> <strong>Safety</strong>, Systems &<br />

Communicati<strong>on</strong><br />

40<br />

20


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Part II<br />

Practical Approaches to <strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

• Prescripti<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> medicati<strong>on</strong> safety<br />

• Communicati<strong>on</strong> issues<br />

– tracking <strong>and</strong> follow-up<br />

– communicati<strong>on</strong> skills<br />

• Transcultural issues<br />

41<br />

Types of Medicati<strong>on</strong> <strong>Error</strong>s<br />

(>40 steps from doctor to patient)<br />

• Prescribing errors<br />

– wr<strong>on</strong>g drug<br />

– wr<strong>on</strong>g dose<br />

• Transcripti<strong>on</strong> errors (miscommunicati<strong>on</strong>)<br />

• Dispensing errors<br />

• Administrati<strong>on</strong> errors<br />

– wr<strong>on</strong>g drug<br />

– wr<strong>on</strong>g route<br />

– wr<strong>on</strong>g time<br />

– improper syringe or IV prep<br />

42<br />

21


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Comm<strong>on</strong> Causes of<br />

Medicati<strong>on</strong> <strong>Error</strong>s<br />

1. Incomplete patient in<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong><br />

2. Unavailable drug in<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong><br />

3. Miscommunicati<strong>on</strong> of drug orders<br />

4. Envir<strong>on</strong>mental factors <strong>and</strong> distracti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

5. Labeling problems<br />

Source: AHA Quality Advisory 1999<br />

http://www.hospitalc<strong>on</strong>nect.com/DesktopServlet<br />

43<br />

Comm<strong>on</strong> Causes of<br />

Medicati<strong>on</strong> <strong>Error</strong>s<br />

1. Incomplete <strong>Patient</strong> In<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong><br />

• Diagnoses<br />

• Lab values<br />

• Allergies<br />

2. Unavailable Drug In<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong><br />

• Drug c<strong>on</strong>traindicati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

• Other medicati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

– Duplicate prescripti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

– Drug interacti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

44<br />

22


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Comm<strong>on</strong> Causes of<br />

Medicati<strong>on</strong> <strong>Error</strong>s<br />

3. Miscommunicati<strong>on</strong> of Drug Orders<br />

• Written prescripti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

• Look-alike names<br />

• Sound-alike names<br />

• Misuse of decimal points <strong>and</strong> zeroes<br />

• Inappropriate abbreviati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

• Misuse of metric <strong>and</strong> apothecary measures<br />

• Ambiguous or incomplete orders<br />

45<br />

Comm<strong>on</strong> Causes of<br />

Medicati<strong>on</strong> <strong>Error</strong>s<br />

4. Envir<strong>on</strong>mental Factors <strong>and</strong> Distracti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

• Noise, interrupti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

- transcripti<strong>on</strong> errors<br />

- multitasking<br />

• Written prescripti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

• Fatigue<br />

• Work overload<br />

• Poor lighting<br />

• Stocking <strong>and</strong> storage problems<br />

46<br />

23


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Comm<strong>on</strong> Causes of<br />

Medicati<strong>on</strong> <strong>Error</strong>s<br />

5. Packaging <strong>and</strong> Labeling Problems<br />

Look-alike packaging<br />

Hard-to-read labels<br />

47<br />

Source: Institute <strong>for</strong> Safe Medicati<strong>on</strong> Practices 2000. (Photos used with permissi<strong>on</strong>)<br />

Comm<strong>on</strong> Causes of<br />

Medicati<strong>on</strong> <strong>Error</strong>s<br />

When the <strong>Patient</strong> Leaves the Office<br />

• Dispensing error at pharmacy<br />

• Failure to read or underst<strong>and</strong> labeling <strong>and</strong><br />

product in<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong><br />

• Drug (e.g., OTCs) or food interacti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

• N<strong>on</strong>-adherence<br />

– Prescripti<strong>on</strong> not filled or refilled<br />

– wr<strong>on</strong>g dose, wr<strong>on</strong>g time<br />

– improper administrati<strong>on</strong> (e.g., asthma inhalers)<br />

48<br />

24


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Soluti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>for</strong> Look-alike or<br />

Sound-alike Names<br />

• D<strong>on</strong>’t rely solely <strong>on</strong> memory<br />

• Tips <strong>for</strong> error preventi<strong>on</strong><br />

– tell the patient/caregiver what it is <strong>and</strong><br />

why you are prescribing it<br />

– provide both generic <strong>and</strong> br<strong>and</strong> names <strong>on</strong><br />

h<strong>and</strong>written prescripti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

– c<strong>on</strong>sider ePocrates, MDPad, iScribe <strong>for</strong> Palm Pilot<br />

– Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) systems<br />

Source: Cohen M. Medicati<strong>on</strong> <strong>Error</strong>s 1999. Joint Commissi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> Accreditati<strong>on</strong> of<br />

Healthcare Organizati<strong>on</strong>s 2001; Nati<strong>on</strong>al Coordinating Council <strong>for</strong> Medicati<strong>on</strong> <strong>Error</strong>s<br />

Reporting <strong>and</strong> Preventi<strong>on</strong> 2001.<br />

49<br />

Soluti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>for</strong> Look-alike or<br />

Sound-alike Names<br />

For Verbal or Teleph<strong>on</strong>e Orders<br />

• Spell out the name of the drug<br />

– e.g., “X” <strong>and</strong> “Z” are comm<strong>on</strong> sound-alikes<br />

Ask listener to repeat the drug name, dosage,<br />

<strong>and</strong> frequency —“Hear Back”<br />

Source: Nati<strong>on</strong>al Coordinating Council <strong>for</strong> Medicati<strong>on</strong> <strong>Error</strong> Reporting <strong>and</strong> Preventi<strong>on</strong><br />

2001.<br />

50<br />

25


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Danger of H<strong>and</strong>written<br />

Prescripti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

• Virtually all prescripti<strong>on</strong>s are h<strong>and</strong>written<br />

• >30% of pharmacies investigated (n = 245)<br />

filled prescripti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>for</strong> potentially lethal<br />

drug combinati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

• Computerized pharmacy orders increase<br />

safety<br />

– allergy alerts<br />

– interacti<strong>on</strong> alerts<br />

– tracking <strong>and</strong> record-keeping functi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

Source: Schiff GD, Rucker TD. Computerized Prescribing, JAMA, 1998.<br />

Cavuto NJ, et al. Pharmacies <strong>and</strong> preventi<strong>on</strong> of potentially fatal drug interacti<strong>on</strong>s, JAMA, 511996.<br />

Soluti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>for</strong> Measures <strong>and</strong><br />

Administrati<strong>on</strong> Orders<br />

• Symbols <strong>and</strong> abbreviati<strong>on</strong>s can be dangerous<br />

– Q.D. Q.I.D. Q.O.D.<br />

– Never use “U” <strong>for</strong> “unit,” easily c<strong>on</strong>fused with “0” <strong>and</strong> “4”<br />

– Write the indicati<strong>on</strong> with “prn” meds<br />

• Triple check dose, <strong>for</strong>m (e.g.,XL, CR, SR), <strong>and</strong><br />

frequency<br />

• Use leading zeroes, but not trailing zeroes<br />

– 0.5 NOT .5<br />

– 5 NOT 5.0<br />

• If you must write, do so legibly <strong>and</strong> include the<br />

purpose!<br />

Source: Cohen M. Medicati<strong>on</strong> <strong>Error</strong>s 1999.<br />

52<br />

26


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Medicati<strong>on</strong> <strong>Error</strong>s at Home<br />

• <strong>Patient</strong>s or caregivers are in c<strong>on</strong>trol<br />

• Pharmacists are your partners<br />

• In<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> educati<strong>on</strong> are critical<br />

– is labeling/in<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong> easy to read?<br />

– is labeling/in<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong> easy to<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>?<br />

– how do you know?<br />

53<br />

Systems & Communicati<strong>on</strong><br />

Tracking <strong>and</strong> Follow-Up<br />

What happens when…<br />

• you h<strong>and</strong> off to another physician?<br />

• the patient goes home?<br />

• the patient switches health plans?<br />

• the patient moves to a different state?<br />

How do you know?<br />

54<br />

27


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Systems & Communicati<strong>on</strong><br />

Dealing with H<strong>and</strong>offs<br />

H<strong>and</strong>off = Opportunity <strong>for</strong> <strong>Error</strong><br />

• Miscommunicati<strong>on</strong><br />

– especially with verbal communicati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

– listening skills are critical: “Hear Back”!<br />

– due to distracti<strong>on</strong>s (e.g., noise, interrupti<strong>on</strong>s)<br />

– due to fatigue <strong>and</strong> stress<br />

55<br />

Systems & Communicati<strong>on</strong><br />

Tracking <strong>and</strong> Follow-Up<br />

Reducing the Risk of <strong>Error</strong><br />

• in<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong> must follow the patient<br />

56<br />

28


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Systems & Communicati<strong>on</strong><br />

C<strong>on</strong>tinuity of Care <strong>and</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

High Risk<br />

• Chr<strong>on</strong>ic c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

– complex care<br />

– many providers<br />

• Changing health plans/employers<br />

• Vulnerable populati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

• Cultural/language issues<br />

• Post-screening<br />

– <strong>for</strong> cancer, cardiovascular disease, etc.<br />

57<br />

Systems & Communicati<strong>on</strong><br />

Electr<strong>on</strong>ic Medical Records<br />

• Tremendous potential<br />

– rapid, seamless communicati<strong>on</strong>; easy retrieval<br />

– automatic interacti<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> allergy checking<br />

• Barriers to adopti<strong>on</strong><br />

– patient privacy<br />

– m<strong>on</strong>ey<br />

– reimbursement<br />

– training<br />

– proprietary systems that can’t communicate with each other<br />

58<br />

29


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Systems & Communicati<strong>on</strong><br />

Available Tracking Systems<br />

Examples of Computerized Medical Records<br />

• MedicaLogic • EpicCare*<br />

• PocketChart • Health Probe PIM<br />

• MedData<br />

• Q.D. Clinical<br />

• ChartWare*<br />

• PowerMed EMR<br />

• Practice Partner<br />

• SOAPware<br />

* include good functi<strong>on</strong>ality <strong>for</strong> patients<br />

• <strong>Patient</strong> Home Records<br />

– asthma, diabetes tools<br />

Source: Rehm S, Kraft S. Electr<strong>on</strong>ic Medical Records, 2001<br />

59<br />

Systems & Communicati<strong>on</strong><br />

Communicati<strong>on</strong> Skills<br />

• Sometimes you see or hear what you<br />

expect, not what’s really there<br />

– slips <strong>and</strong> lapses due to c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>ing biases<br />

• Every link in a chain of communicati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

harbors a latent failure<br />

– put it in writing<br />

60<br />

30


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Systems & Communicati<strong>on</strong><br />

Communicati<strong>on</strong> Skills<br />

Many Ways to Communicate<br />

• Speaking<br />

– face-to-face<br />

– via teleph<strong>on</strong>e<br />

• Writing<br />

– <strong>on</strong> a chart, sign-out, or prescripti<strong>on</strong> pad<br />

– in a letter or fax<br />

– via computer (e-mail)<br />

• Sign language<br />

• Body language<br />

61<br />

Systems & Communicati<strong>on</strong><br />

Transcultural Issues<br />

Cultural Diversity Adds Complexity<br />

• Language barriers: “<strong>on</strong>ce” vs. <strong>on</strong>ce<br />

• Health belief models<br />

• Social styles <strong>and</strong> moral values<br />

• Religious beliefs <strong>and</strong> practices<br />

• Ec<strong>on</strong>omic c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

62<br />

31


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Systems & Communicati<strong>on</strong><br />

Language Barriers<br />

• Access to translators<br />

– “language banks”: AT&T, etc.<br />

– multicultural staff<br />

– judicious use of family members as translators<br />

• Qualificati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

– ability to translate medical terminology<br />

– competence with dialects<br />

• Expense/reimbursement<br />

– another unfunded m<strong>and</strong>ate<br />

– an issue that will not go away<br />

63<br />

Systems & Communicati<strong>on</strong><br />

Health Belief Models<br />

• Diverse views <strong>on</strong> health <strong>and</strong> wellness<br />

– percepti<strong>on</strong>s of distinguishing physical attributes<br />

– how the human body works <strong>and</strong> stays well<br />

• Attitudes toward physical interventi<strong>on</strong><br />

– drawing or receiving blood; surgery<br />

– laying <strong>on</strong> of h<strong>and</strong>s<br />

• “Alternative” therapies<br />

– home remedies<br />

– physical therapies (e.g., acupuncture)<br />

– diet<br />

64<br />

32


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Systems & Communicati<strong>on</strong><br />

Social Styles <strong>and</strong> Moral Values<br />

• Trust<br />

• Eye c<strong>on</strong>tact<br />

– propriety<br />

• Touch<br />

– modesty<br />

• Social interacti<strong>on</strong>s<br />

– within family systems<br />

– between males <strong>and</strong> females<br />

– between different age groups<br />

65<br />

Systems & Communicati<strong>on</strong><br />

Religious Belief <strong>and</strong> Practices<br />

• Fasting<br />

• Prayer<br />

• Reverence <strong>for</strong> elders, family, <strong>and</strong><br />

ancestors<br />

66<br />

33


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Systems <strong>and</strong> Communicati<strong>on</strong><br />

Transcultural Resources<br />

• Nati<strong>on</strong>al Center <strong>for</strong> Cultural Competence<br />

(Georgetown University Child Development Center)<br />

http://gucdc.georgetown.edu/nccc/ncccabout.html<br />

• The Initiative to Eliminate Racial <strong>and</strong> Ethnic<br />

Disparities in Health (HHS)<br />

http://race<strong>and</strong>health.hhs.gov/<br />

• The Cross Cultural Health Care Program<br />

http://www.xculture.org/index.cfm<br />

67<br />

Part II - C<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong><br />

• Prescripti<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> medicati<strong>on</strong> safety<br />

– look-alike <strong>and</strong> sound-alike drug names<br />

– decimals, zeroes, <strong>and</strong> abbreviati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

– CPOE <strong>and</strong> pharmacist c<strong>on</strong>sults can reduce errors<br />

• Tracking <strong>and</strong> follow-up<br />

– chr<strong>on</strong>ic c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s present problems<br />

– complete, accurate charting <strong>and</strong> c<strong>on</strong>firmati<strong>on</strong><br />

– electr<strong>on</strong>ic medical record systems can help<br />

• Transcultural issues<br />

– more than language<br />

68<br />

34


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Improving a Critical Dimensi<strong>on</strong> of<br />

Quality in Health Care<br />

Part III: Case Studies <strong>and</strong> Root Cause<br />

Analysis of Adverse Events<br />

69<br />

<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong> Curriculum<br />

Part III<br />

Case Studies <strong>and</strong> Root Cause Analysis<br />

• Case #1: Post-surgical Chest Pain<br />

• Case #2: Adverse Drug Event<br />

• Case #3: Missed Ectopic Pregnancy<br />

70<br />

35


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Guidelines <strong>for</strong> Root Cause<br />

Analysis<br />

• Describe event<br />

• Identify immediate (proximate) cause(s)<br />

– human factors<br />

• Identify c<strong>on</strong>tributing factors<br />

– latent errors<br />

– systems <strong>and</strong> processes<br />

• Create acti<strong>on</strong> plan <strong>for</strong> the SYSTEM<br />

Source: Joint Commissi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> Accreditati<strong>on</strong> of Healthcare Organizati<strong>on</strong>s 2001.<br />

71<br />

Identificati<strong>on</strong> of C<strong>on</strong>tributing<br />

Factors<br />

• Human resource issues<br />

• In<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong> management issues<br />

• Envir<strong>on</strong>mental issues<br />

• Leadership <strong>and</strong> organizati<strong>on</strong>al culture<br />

• Communicati<strong>on</strong><br />

Source: Joint Commissi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> Accreditati<strong>on</strong> of Healthcare Organizati<strong>on</strong>s 2001.<br />

72<br />

36


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Case #1: Post-Surgical Chest Pain<br />

65-year-old Haitian man<br />

N<strong>on</strong>-English-speaking<br />

• <strong>Patient</strong> admitted <strong>for</strong> elective cholecystectomy<br />

• Surgery per<strong>for</strong>med<br />

The next morning...<br />

• Daughter reported father’s chest pain to staff<br />

73<br />

Case #1: Post-Surgical Chest Pain<br />

Surge<strong>on</strong>’s follow-up <strong>on</strong> the surgical floor:<br />

• evaluated patient, analyzed EKG<br />

(tachycardia)<br />

• paged medical c<strong>on</strong>sultant<br />

(no immediate reply)<br />

• got paged to OR<br />

• ordered chest radiograph to rule out postoperative<br />

pneum<strong>on</strong>ia<br />

74<br />

37


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Case #1: Post-Surgical Chest Pain<br />

• <strong>Patient</strong> taken to Radiology<br />

2 hours later...<br />

• Daughter asked nurse about father’s whereabouts<br />

– nurse called Radiology<br />

– technician said patient would return to floor so<strong>on</strong><br />

30 minutes later...<br />

• <strong>Patient</strong> returned to floor<br />

– had chest pain <strong>and</strong> increased shortness of breath<br />

75<br />

Case #1: Post-Surgical Chest Pain<br />

• Surge<strong>on</strong> was paged (in OR)<br />

– OR nurse returned page, c<strong>on</strong>ferred with surge<strong>on</strong><br />

– Repeat EKG was ordered<br />

• Sec<strong>on</strong>d EKG completed <strong>and</strong> faxed to surge<strong>on</strong><br />

• Surge<strong>on</strong> requested Radiology review of chest<br />

film<br />

– film could not be located<br />

76<br />

38


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Case #1: Post-Surgical Chest Pain<br />

• <strong>Patient</strong>’s c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> worsened<br />

– diaphoretic, hypotensive, tachypneic<br />

– O 2 saturati<strong>on</strong> = 75% (O 2 given @ 2L/hr)<br />

• Code called <strong>and</strong> patient transferred to ICU<br />

– emergent intubati<strong>on</strong><br />

– CT angiogram revealed saddle pulm<strong>on</strong>ary embolus<br />

• Chest film had never been completed<br />

77<br />

Sample Flow Chart: Case #1<br />

Processes Proximate Causes System Factors<br />

• PACU follow-up<br />

• C<strong>on</strong>sult request<br />

<strong>and</strong> follow-up<br />

• Transfer of<br />

resp<strong>on</strong>sibility<br />

SURGEON<br />

• Delayed diagnosis of pulm<strong>on</strong>ary<br />

embolus<br />

TRANSPORT WORKER<br />

• Left patient in Radiology without<br />

notifying resp<strong>on</strong>sible pers<strong>on</strong><br />

Inexperience<br />

C<strong>on</strong>sultant inaccessible<br />

No clinical backup available<br />

Overworked staff<br />

H<strong>and</strong>off process<br />

Communicati<strong>on</strong> envir<strong>on</strong>ment<br />

• Transfer of<br />

resp<strong>on</strong>sibility<br />

• Transcultural<br />

communicati<strong>on</strong><br />

RADIOLOGY NURSE<br />

• Did not m<strong>on</strong>itor patient<br />

• Did not notify resp<strong>on</strong>sible nurse<br />

• Did not recognize patient’s distress<br />

RADIOLOGY TECHNICIAN<br />

• Did not recognize patient’s distress<br />

Overworked staff<br />

H<strong>and</strong>off process<br />

No interpreter available<br />

No interpreter available<br />

78<br />

39


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Case #1: C<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

Keys to Improved <strong>Safety</strong><br />

• Interdepartmental m<strong>on</strong>itoring <strong>and</strong> tracking<br />

– transport protocols <strong>and</strong> adherence<br />

– h<strong>and</strong>off/sign out protocols <strong>and</strong> adherence<br />

• Staffing<br />

– distincti<strong>on</strong> between clinical <strong>and</strong> n<strong>on</strong>clinical tasks<br />

• Transcultural communicati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

– language banks<br />

79<br />

Case #2: Adverse Drug Event<br />

88-year-old woman with dementia<br />

<strong>and</strong> history of hypertensi<strong>on</strong>/CAD<br />

• <strong>Patient</strong> became c<strong>on</strong>fused at nursing home<br />

– transferred to Emergency Department<br />

– previous admissi<strong>on</strong> <strong>for</strong> urosepsis<br />

• notati<strong>on</strong> of allergy to levofloxacin<br />

• Initial evaluati<strong>on</strong> in ED<br />

– leukocytosis <strong>and</strong> pyuria<br />

– no fever or flank pain<br />

• ED physician ordered levofloxacin<br />

80<br />

40


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Case #2: Adverse Drug Event<br />

• Levofloxacin administered <strong>on</strong> medical floor<br />

Over the next 6 hours...<br />

• <strong>Patient</strong> became agitated<br />

– required sedati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> restraint<br />

• <strong>Patient</strong> showed signs of anaphylaxis<br />

81<br />

Case #2: Adverse Drug Event<br />

• <strong>Patient</strong> transferred to ICU<br />

• Treated with…<br />

– IV corticosteroids<br />

– antihistamine<br />

– inhaled beta ag<strong>on</strong>ist<br />

• Antibiotic switched to IV cephalosporin<br />

82<br />

41


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Sample Flow Chart: Case #2<br />

Processes Proximate Causes C<strong>on</strong>tributing Factors<br />

• Document drug allergy<br />

• Transfer to nursing home<br />

• Check transfer sheets<br />

• Check in-house medical<br />

record<br />

• Antibiotic Rx<br />

• Check medical record<br />

• Rx dispensing<br />

• Documentati<strong>on</strong><br />

1st FLOOR NURSE<br />

• ADR not recorded<br />

ED PHYSICIAN<br />

• Ordered drug to which<br />

patient was allergic<br />

PHARMACY<br />

• Dispensed drug to which<br />

patient was allergic<br />

Incomplete documentati<strong>on</strong><br />

Incomplete transfer data<br />

Delayed record<br />

ED workload<br />

Medical record not checked<br />

Incomplete computerized<br />

medical record<br />

Lack of integrated system<br />

• Check medical record<br />

• Rx administrati<strong>on</strong><br />

• Documentati<strong>on</strong><br />

• <strong>Patient</strong> m<strong>on</strong>itoring<br />

2nd FLOOR NURSE<br />

• Administered drug to<br />

which patient was<br />

allergic<br />

Overworked staff<br />

Medical record not checked<br />

83<br />

Case #2: C<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

Keys to Improved <strong>Safety</strong><br />

• Maintenance <strong>and</strong> transfer of medical records<br />

– recordkeeping protocols <strong>and</strong> adherence<br />

• Multiple allergy alert mechanisms<br />

• CPOE?<br />

– allergy alerts available at point of care<br />

– automatic updating of medical records<br />

84<br />

42


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Case #3: Missed Ectopic Pregnancy<br />

35-year-old woman with painless vaginal bleeding<br />

• <strong>Patient</strong> observed vaginal bleeding <strong>for</strong> 3 weeks<br />

– called physician’s office <strong>for</strong> appointment<br />

– PCP’s associate covered the case<br />

• History<br />

– last menstrual period 3 weeks ago<br />

– uterine fibroids<br />

– no medicati<strong>on</strong>s or herbal remedies<br />

• Unremarkable exam<br />

85<br />

Case #3: Missed Ectopic Pregnancy<br />

• Pelvic examinati<strong>on</strong><br />

– blood at cervical os<br />

– n<strong>on</strong>gravid uterus<br />

– several small masses (myomas)<br />

– no cervical moti<strong>on</strong> tenderness<br />

• Suspected bleeding due to fibroid<br />

– possible annovulati<strong>on</strong>, incomplete aborti<strong>on</strong> or<br />

uterine polyp<br />

• Tests ordered<br />

– cultures<br />

– CBC<br />

– blood pregnancy test<br />

86<br />

43


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Case #3: Missed Ectopic Pregnancy<br />

• Instructed patient to call office <strong>for</strong> lab<br />

results<br />

• Prescribed medroxyprogester<strong>on</strong>e acetate<br />

• <strong>Patient</strong> called <strong>for</strong> test results<br />

• Physician unavailable, no callback<br />

87<br />

Case #3: Missed Ectopic Pregnancy<br />

• Bleeding c<strong>on</strong>tinued<br />

• <strong>Patient</strong> presented to Emergency<br />

Department<br />

– orthostasis<br />

– tachycardia<br />

– tachypnea<br />

– Hct = 14%<br />

• Ruptured ectopic pregnancy<br />

– emergency laparoscopy/salpingectomy<br />

– hypotensi<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> sepsis<br />

88<br />

44


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Sample Flow Chart – Case #3<br />

Processes Proximate Causes C<strong>on</strong>tributing Factors<br />

• Examinati<strong>on</strong><br />

• Diagnosis<br />

• Treatment (Rx)<br />

• Referral<br />

• Check lab results<br />

• Follow-up w/ associate<br />

• Dictati<strong>on</strong>/transcripti<strong>on</strong><br />

• Communicati<strong>on</strong><br />

– with patient<br />

– with provider<br />

• Communicati<strong>on</strong><br />

– with associate<br />

– with patient<br />

Covering Physician<br />

• No mechanism <strong>for</strong><br />

explicitly transferring<br />

resp<strong>on</strong>sibility <strong>for</strong><br />

outpatients<br />

• No mechanism to<br />

ensure labs returned<br />

to office <strong>and</strong> viewed<br />

by appropriate<br />

clinician<br />

RN<br />

• No mechanism <strong>for</strong><br />

disclosing lab results to<br />

patient<br />

Primary Care Physician<br />

• No mechanism <strong>for</strong> calling<br />

patient back<br />

Atypical presentati<strong>on</strong><br />

Referral process<br />

Lab reporting <strong>and</strong> follow-up<br />

processes<br />

Sign-out process<br />

Transcripti<strong>on</strong> delay<br />

Protocol <strong>for</strong> patient<br />

communicati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

Protocol <strong>for</strong> office<br />

communicati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

89<br />

Case #3: C<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

Keys to Improved <strong>Safety</strong><br />

• Point-of-service pregnancy testing<br />

• Messaging systems <strong>and</strong> protocols<br />

– between associates<br />

– between office <strong>and</strong> labs<br />

• Algorithm <strong>for</strong> nurses<br />

– elicit important in<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong> from patient<br />

90<br />

45


<strong>Patient</strong> <strong>Safety</strong><br />

Practical Approaches<br />

Questi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

91<br />

The End<br />

92<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!