04.05.2015 Views

Jailhouse Lawyer's Handbook - Sentencing and Justice Reform ...

Jailhouse Lawyer's Handbook - Sentencing and Justice Reform ...

Jailhouse Lawyer's Handbook - Sentencing and Justice Reform ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Center’s litigation guide for prisoners, Protecting Your<br />

Health & Safety, has a very helpful chapter on<br />

developing discovery strategies. You will find<br />

information on ordering that book in Appendix E.<br />

In most cases, the first step in the discovery process is<br />

called a “Rule 26(f) Meeting.” The Federal Rules of<br />

Civil Procedure require that the plaintiffs <strong>and</strong> the<br />

defendants get together to talk about the case, the<br />

possibility of settlement (when you come to an<br />

agreement with the defendants that ends your case<br />

before trial), arrange for some exchange of information,<br />

<strong>and</strong> create a discovery plan or schedule. You need to<br />

read your district court’s rules, however, because many<br />

courts do not require this meeting for pro se inmates. If<br />

you don’t need to have a Rule 26(f) meeting, you can<br />

start right in on discovery requests.<br />

1. Discovery Tools<br />

There are four main discovery tools: depositions,<br />

interrogatories, production, <strong>and</strong> inspection. (You can<br />

also request an examination by an outside doctor, under<br />

Rule 35). This <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> gives you only a brief<br />

introduction to these techniques. The details of how<br />

they work are in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.<br />

A “deposition” is a very valuable discovery tool. You<br />

meet with a defendant or a potential witness, that<br />

person’s lawyer, <strong>and</strong> maybe a stenographer. You or<br />

your lawyer ask questions which the “deponent” (the<br />

defendant or witness you are deposing) answers under<br />

oath. Because the witness is under oath, he or she can<br />

be prosecuted for perjury if he or she lies. The<br />

questions <strong>and</strong> answers are tape-recorded or taken down<br />

by the stenographer. A deposition is very much like<br />

testimony at a trial. In fact, you can use what was said<br />

at a deposition in a trial if the person who gave the<br />

deposition either (1) is a party (plaintiff or defendant),<br />

(2) says something at the trial which contradicts the<br />

deposition, or (3) can’t testify at the trial. Despite these<br />

benefits, you should BEWARE: a deposition is very<br />

hard to arrange from in prison, because it can be<br />

expensive, <strong>and</strong> it involves a lot of people.<br />

In the United States District Court<br />

For the _____________________<br />

-------------------------------------------x<br />

Name of first plaintiff :<br />

in the case, et al.,<br />

Plaintiffs,<br />

: PLAINITFF’S<br />

: FIRST SET OF<br />

: INTERROGAv.<br />

: TORIES TO<br />

: DEFENDANTS<br />

Names of first defendant :<br />

in the case, et al.,<br />

: Civil Action No. __<br />

Defendants :<br />

-------------------------------------------x<br />

In accordance with Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil<br />

Procedure, Plaintiff requests that Defendant [Defendant’s<br />

name] answer the following interrogatories under oath, <strong>and</strong><br />

that the answers be signed by the person making them <strong>and</strong> be<br />

served on plaintiffs within 30 days of service of these<br />

interrogatories.<br />

If you cannot answer the following interrogatories in full,<br />

after exercising due diligence to secure the information to do<br />

so, so state <strong>and</strong> answer to the extent possible, specifying your<br />

inability to answer the remainder <strong>and</strong> stating whatever<br />

information or knowledge you have concerning the<br />

unanswered portions.<br />

These interrogatories shall be deemed continuing, so as to<br />

require supplemental answers as new <strong>and</strong> different<br />

information materializes.<br />

[List your questions here…<strong>and</strong> be creative <strong>and</strong> as detailed as<br />

possible. ]<br />

If you have a guard brutality case, you may want to ask<br />

questions about how long the specific guard has<br />

worked at the prison, where he is assigned, what his<br />

duties are, what he remembers of the incident, what he<br />

wrote about the incident in any reports, whether he has<br />

ever been disciplined, etc.<br />

It is also a good idea to take the opportunity to try to<br />

find out who else might be a helpful witness. You<br />

could ask the defendant to:<br />

“Interrogatories” are written questions which must be<br />

answered in writing under oath. Under Fed.R.Civ.P.<br />

33, you can send up to 25 questions to each of the other<br />

parties to the suit. A person who is just a witness, <strong>and</strong><br />

not a party, cannot be made to answer interrogatories,<br />

though he or she can voluntarily answer questions in an<br />

affidavit. To get an affidavit from someone in another<br />

prison, you may need a court order. You can use the<br />

following example to write interrogatories of your own.<br />

<br />

State the name <strong>and</strong> address or otherwise identify<br />

<strong>and</strong> locate any person who, to you or your<br />

attorney’s knowledge, claims to know of facts<br />

relevant to the conduct described in these<br />

interrogatories.<br />

JAILHOUSE LAWYERS HANDBOOK – CHAPTER FOUR<br />

58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!