05.05.2015 Views

Crastvell Trading Limited v Bozel SA - Radcliffe Chambers

Crastvell Trading Limited v Bozel SA - Radcliffe Chambers

Crastvell Trading Limited v Bozel SA - Radcliffe Chambers

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MR. JUSTICE DAVID STEEL: Yes. Attendances on colleagues is a rather strange<br />

concept. It may be popping round next door and saying: what do you think?<br />

MR. MAJUMDAR: Yes. Cumulatively that seems like quite a lot of time under that<br />

category.<br />

MR. JUSTICE DAVID STEEL: What is your offer, around two bases, either all in or<br />

alternatively by way of payment on account?<br />

MR. MAJUMDAR: The figure of 18 all in is suggested from behind.<br />

MR. JUSTICE DAVID STEEL: Thank you. Mr. Polley, attendance on colleagues is an<br />

unusual item.<br />

MR. POLLEY: My Lord, may I just take instructions very briefly. (Pause) My Lord,<br />

what I can say about that is your Lordship will see that category includes a number<br />

of things. Attendances on the court includes, for instance, being at this hearing<br />

which was, at one stage, scheduled to take an entire day. So there are a couple of<br />

hours in that respect. Attendances on colleagues involves internal discussions<br />

within my instructing solicitors, Nabarro, about the case. It is impossible at this<br />

stage to get a detailed breakdown.<br />

MR. JUSTICE DAVID STEEL: Between the people named.<br />

MR. POLLEY: Yes, for instance Mr. Warne speaking to Mr. Taplin or whatever. My<br />

Lord, I think that is all I can helpfully say on the material in front of me. In<br />

relation to attendances on documents, very briefly, without seeing my learned<br />

friend’s costs schedule it is very difficult to know what the sensible comparator<br />

would be. In relation to photocopying and binding, I am told that is what it cost us,<br />

my Lord, as simple as that. The suggestion that £18,000 which is less than half, is<br />

the appropriate measure on an indemnity basis in a claim of this magnitude is --<br />

MR. JUSTICE DAVID STEEL: An option: £35,000 all in or £25,000 on account?<br />

MR. POLLEY: My Lord, I will just take instructions. (Pause)<br />

MR. JUSTICE DAVID STEEL: A good example of a discussion between colleagues.<br />

MR. POLLEY: My Lord, this is a discussion with a client in fact; this is attendances on<br />

clients!<br />

MR. JUSTICE DAVID STEEL: I see. (Pause)<br />

BEVERLEY F NUNNERY & CO<br />

OFFICIAL SHORTHAND WRITERS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!