08.05.2015 Views

PDM enabled Interoperability @ Ford - GPDIS

PDM enabled Interoperability @ Ford - GPDIS

PDM enabled Interoperability @ Ford - GPDIS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PLM-Driven 3D<br />

<strong>Interoperability</strong> @ <strong>Ford</strong><br />

Strategy & Opportunities<br />

Ilan Weitzer<br />

<strong>Ford</strong> Motor Co.<br />

BOEING is a trademark of Boeing Management Company<br />

Copyright © 2012 Boeing. All rights reserved.<br />

Copyright © 2012 Northrop Grumman Corporation. All rights reserved.<br />

<strong>GPDIS</strong>_2012.ppt | 1


Topics<br />

Global Product Data <strong>Interoperability</strong> Summit | 2012<br />

• PLM <strong>Interoperability</strong><br />

• Current Architecture<br />

• Opportunities<br />

– Product Visualization<br />

– CAE Visualization<br />

– Engineering 3D Efficiency<br />

– Suppliers Integration<br />

– 3D Mobility<br />

– Openness and Standards<br />

• Discussion<br />

BOEING is a trademark of Boeing Management Company<br />

Copyright © 2012 Boeing. All rights reserved.<br />

Copyright © 2012 Northrop Grumman Corporation. All rights reserved.<br />

<strong>GPDIS</strong>_2012.ppt | 2


1.Geometry and<br />

Topology<br />

1.Geometry and<br />

Topology<br />

3.CAD metadata<br />

(PMI,<br />

annotation ,<br />

Weld, layers &<br />

groups)<br />

4. Interface to ancillary<br />

products (CAx,<br />

EESE, etc.)<br />

PLM <strong>Interoperability</strong> - Overview<br />

• A Global product strategy relies on a global PLM strategy<br />

• A global PLM strategy is <strong>enabled</strong> by interoperability<br />

• <strong>Interoperability</strong> must be achieved at all levels<br />

• Visualization as key enabler<br />

Primary Target<br />

Next: Re-mastering<br />

9. Common user<br />

interface,<br />

common data<br />

model<br />

7 <strong>PDM</strong> driven data<br />

exchange, PMI<br />

independent of CAD tool<br />

5. Design-in-Context<br />

– Tessellation,<br />

Precise, On-<br />

Demand<br />

2. Assembly<br />

Hierarchy<br />

6. Associativity support<br />

(change notification)<br />

8. CAD History Tree, Design<br />

Intent, geometry<br />

supporting info<br />

2. Assembly<br />

Hierarchy<br />

Level<br />

1<br />

2 3 4<br />

5<br />

6 7 8<br />

• Increasing Levels of complexity<br />

Level-1<br />

Data & Tools <strong>Interoperability</strong><br />

across core design and<br />

engineering activities<br />

• Product Definition (Geometry)<br />

• PMI & Metadata<br />

• CAD Attributes<br />

• <strong>PDM</strong>-Enabled<br />

8<br />

9<br />

Level-2<br />

<strong>Interoperability</strong> across<br />

all PLM Components,<br />

Processes & users<br />

• <strong>PDM</strong><br />

• BOM<br />

• MFG Systems and Processes<br />

• Requirements & Assumptions<br />

• Functional, Logical & Physical<br />

• Concept/Styling/Marketing/Sale<br />

Level-3<br />

<strong>Interoperability</strong> across<br />

global vehicle programs<br />

• Global Platform<br />

• Global Commodities<br />

• Global Release & Change<br />

Management<br />

• Enabled by Standard<br />

Information Model<br />

Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary 3


PLM Driven <strong>Interoperability</strong><br />

Design/Styling<br />

TCe<br />

JT<br />

JT<br />

Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary


JT Enabled Multi-CAD Design in Context<br />

• Visualization-based interoperability<br />

• Reuse of existing assets<br />

• Multi-CAD / Single <strong>PDM</strong> Environment<br />

• JT Generation via Tce Translation Services<br />

• Seamless and Transparent<br />

• On the fly JT read capabilities in V5 and IDEAS<br />

• Seamless Integration on consumption<br />

• C2C is still around, but in diminishing capacity<br />

Teamcenter Engineering<br />

JT Read/Write<br />

IDEAS<br />

CATIA V5<br />

Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary


Evolution of Visualization at <strong>Ford</strong><br />

Key Milestones<br />

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002<br />

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008<br />

2009<br />

2010<br />

2011<br />

2012<br />

Clearance Management<br />

Systematic analysis of clearance / clash<br />

Immersive Buck<br />

Digital Human with motion capture<br />

Web-Based PC Access<br />

Broad web-based access to Digital Mockup<br />

Automatic Tessellation<br />

Continuous, automatic generation of a general purpose digital mockup<br />

Distributed Visualization<br />

More frequent generation of the digital mockup available on numerous visualization servers<br />

Manual Digital Buck<br />

Periodic manual generation of the digital mockup to support major program milestones<br />

JT for CAD <strong>Interoperability</strong><br />

Design-in-context<br />

<strong>PDM</strong> based Visualization<br />

Visualization imbedded in the <strong>PDM</strong><br />

TCBuck<br />

LTDR<br />

Enhanced <strong>PDM</strong> Vis<br />

Suppliers Integration<br />

Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary 6


Current <strong>Ford</strong> PLM Environment<br />

Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary


Integrated C3PNG Digital Environment<br />

TCe<br />

Mfg Rich Client<br />

BOM<br />

Authoring<br />

Rich Client<br />

Thin Client<br />

FIDES<br />

AVBOM<br />

ICM - Integrated Clash<br />

Management<br />

Issue<br />

Management<br />

IDEAS<br />

CATIA V5<br />

Multi-CAD<br />

TC Vis<br />

Clash Mgmt<br />

Req. Mgmt<br />

Digital Prototyping<br />

Integrated<br />

Reporting<br />

Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary


JT Pipeline – DPA Process View<br />

Digital Pre-Assembly: Geometric Verification & Compliance to Standards<br />

DPA Assessments<br />

DPA 0<br />

Function<br />

• Dynamic<br />

displacement<br />

• Movement<br />

• Heat<br />

Clearances<br />

• Variation<br />

DPA Owner:<br />

Block Leaders<br />

DPA 1<br />

Static<br />

Nominal<br />

Taisen<br />

• Clearances<br />

• Positional<br />

correctness<br />

• Interface<br />

completeness<br />

DPA Owner:<br />

Block Leaders<br />

DPA 2 DPA 3 DPA 4 DPA 5<br />

Craftsmanship Tolerance Service<br />

Mfg/<br />

Assembly<br />

• Design<br />

Appearance<br />

• Margins/<br />

Flushness<br />

• Grains / Gloss<br />

DPA Owner:<br />

Craftsmanship<br />

• Formability<br />

• VSA Focus<br />

• Removal<br />

• Assembly<br />

studies agreed<br />

• Process<br />

Access<br />

by Design,<br />

• Plant Floor<br />

• Damageability<br />

Program & VO<br />

Ergonomics<br />

DPA Owner:<br />

Craftsmanship<br />

DPA Owner:<br />

FCSD<br />

DPA Owner: VO<br />

& SBU ME<br />

DPA 6<br />

Package/<br />

Ergo<br />

• Ingress/egress<br />

• Reach<br />

• Vision<br />

• Accessibility<br />

• Spatial<br />

Relationships<br />

DPA Owner:<br />

Basic Design<br />

Package<br />

UN & UP UN & UP UP<br />

UP<br />

UN & UP UN & UP UN & UP<br />

Requirements<br />

Verification<br />

Functional<br />

Specifications<br />

• Material<br />

• Key Life<br />

• Component<br />

Nominal Taisen<br />

• Component<br />

System &<br />

interface<br />

requirements.<br />

Craftsmanship<br />

Specifications<br />

• Exterior<br />

• Interior<br />

• Under Hood<br />

Appearance<br />

Tolerance<br />

• Acceptance<br />

Criteria for<br />

Component<br />

Variation<br />

Service<br />

Specification<br />

• Component<br />

Standards for<br />

Service<br />

Mfg/Assembly<br />

• Component Mfg<br />

Standards<br />

• Control specs<br />

• DFA Req<br />

Package/Ergo<br />

• Component<br />

Ergo Req<br />

• Component<br />

Package<br />

Standards<br />

Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary 9


JT Pipeline - Systems View<br />

JT Enabled <strong>Interoperability</strong> across the product creation tool sets<br />

TCe<br />

PD/KBE<br />

Color Buck<br />

PDV<br />

Jack<br />

TCe<br />

TC Buck<br />

E2Ks<br />

Indirect<br />

Jack PDV<br />

Jack TCe<br />

Services<br />

IsoDraw<br />

3DVia Composer<br />

Adobe Illustr.<br />

PDV<br />

3DsMax<br />

AutoTrol<br />

TCViTransCabels<br />

TCVis<br />

VisJack<br />

VSP<br />

Marketing<br />

& Sale<br />

JT pipeline<br />

Mfg<br />

TCM<br />

eMS<br />

Jack<br />

FIDES<br />

Flexible PartViewer<br />

EMS Planner<br />

PTO<br />

CAE Mashing<br />

TessOnDemand<br />

ePEds<br />

PTO Buck<br />

Corp Design<br />

ICIDO<br />

Opticore<br />

Bunkspeed<br />

Showcase<br />

MotionBuilder<br />

Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary


Significance of <strong>Interoperability</strong><br />

Full Vehicle<br />

Buck<br />

(1996)<br />

PD and Mfg<br />

Illustrations<br />

(2007)<br />

Plant<br />

Visualization<br />

(1998)<br />

Marketing<br />

For 20 Vehicles<br />

(2007)<br />

1 st Buck<br />

“On Road”<br />

(1999)<br />

1 st Marketing<br />

Process from JT<br />

(2006)<br />

Photo-Realistic, Engineering<br />

LIVE Reviews<br />

(2007)<br />

Ergo-based<br />

Serviceability<br />

(2000)<br />

Service Tools<br />

“InClass”<br />

(2006)<br />

Mfg PMI<br />

(2000)<br />

Released<br />

Content<br />

(2000)<br />

Digital<br />

Pre-Assembly<br />

(2005)<br />

Service<br />

Manuals<br />

(2001)<br />

Warranty Part<br />

Support Desk<br />

(2001)<br />

<strong>Ford</strong> GT<br />

Marketing<br />

Swept Volume (2004)<br />

for Serviceability<br />

(2005)<br />

Dealers<br />

Catalogs<br />

(2003)<br />

“Shadowed”<br />

Under hood<br />

Drawings<br />

(2007)<br />

Interactive<br />

Service Pubs<br />

(2008)<br />

Web-based Build<br />

and Price<br />

(2008)<br />

<strong>PDM</strong>-bases<br />

Visualization<br />

(2009)<br />

Future:<br />

HD3D, AWS,<br />

Mobility<br />

Immersive Buck<br />

(2007)<br />

Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary 11


Summary: Visualization Is <strong>Interoperability</strong><br />

• Product Visualization - Lightweight product data everywhere<br />

– Ability to move native geometry interactively to the visualization tool, enabling<br />

real-time viewing and analysis<br />

• Verification and Digital Prototyping<br />

– Digital Pre Assembly (DPA) Process enabler<br />

• Visualization-based CAD <strong>Interoperability</strong><br />

– Data sharing and collaboration across multiple design and engineering disciplines<br />

using efficient product data representation.<br />

– Design-in-Context with reference data<br />

• Ability to work with geometry in one CAD tool with reference geometry from another<br />

CAD tool<br />

• Geometry pipeline to engineering applications and products (CAD, KBE,<br />

CAE, Illustration, etc.)<br />

• Product pipeline to Manufacturing applications<br />

• Product representation for photo-realistic and VR applications<br />

• Legacy Migration & Archival<br />

– Bridging between next generation and carryover systems and Long-term data<br />

retention<br />

– IDEAS and PDGS archived as JT<br />

Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary 12


What are some of the Opportunities<br />

• PLM <strong>Interoperability</strong><br />

• Current Architecture<br />

• Opportunities<br />

– Product Visualization<br />

– CAE Visualization<br />

– Engineering Efficiency<br />

– Suppliers Integration<br />

– 3D Mobility<br />

– Openness and Standards<br />

• Discussion<br />

Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary


• Product Visualization Supports Decision making<br />

• <strong>Interoperability</strong> is manual and customized<br />

• Integration with PLM is just kicking off<br />

Product Visualization<br />

Concept<br />

Design and<br />

Simulation<br />

Marketing<br />

Sale<br />

Styling<br />

Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary


Example: Advanced Material Interop<br />

• In the PLM today, CAD applications and<br />

Technical Visualization (Mock-up)<br />

applications have been integrated with <strong>PDM</strong>.<br />

• Other visualization applications supporting<br />

High End Visualization, Photo-Realistic<br />

Rendering, Video Animation, Virtual Reality<br />

have not been integrated.<br />

• Most of the HEV systems are typically used<br />

standalone with repetitive manual effort<br />

required to manage and update information.<br />

• So best in class capabilities are typically custom-made with data conversion optimized for<br />

each company.<br />

• There is a growing need to improve integration and work flows for visualization<br />

applications that utilize current data from the <strong>PDM</strong>/PLM environment.<br />

• There is a case for <strong>PDM</strong>/PLM driven Visualization with a goal that applications integrated<br />

with <strong>PDM</strong>/PLM systems have a consistent and predictable set of visualization behaviors.<br />

• There are no industry wide requirements for PLM integration of Visualization Systems &<br />

Tools<br />

Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary


Advanced Color Material - Automotive POCs<br />

GM’s POC Phase 1<br />

GM, Autodesk, RTT, Siemens<br />

Upstream/Downstream Vis<br />

<strong>Ford</strong>’s POC Phase 2<br />

<strong>Ford</strong>, Autodesk, Theorem, Siemens<br />

• JTOpen’s effort<br />

• Feasibility for using GUMID as a<br />

persistent color attributes index for<br />

consistent visualization<br />

• Feasibility to interop, associate, use and<br />

maintain the color attributes during<br />

engineering workflows phases<br />

(Teamcenter, TCVis, V5)<br />

• GAAG’s Product Visualization<br />

TCe<br />

Engineering Vis<br />

Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary


CAE Visualization<br />

• Functional Buck<br />

• Better communication of CAE results<br />

into the PD decision making process<br />

• Improved robustness and efficiency of CAE<br />

model build process via closer link to the<br />

<strong>PDM</strong> system<br />

• Improved quality of CAE analysis based<br />

on better integration on geometrical<br />

and non-geometrical data<br />

• Improved consistency of the design/<br />

package assessment by enabling a<br />

integrated geometrical and functional<br />

assessment<br />

• Improved communication of complex<br />

CAE results by enabling a visualization<br />

in an immersive VR environment<br />

Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary 17


Visualization in the Digital Buck<br />

What is possible today (a CFD Example)<br />

EnSight geom EnSight results CAD geom<br />

Clip plane<br />

y const.<br />

Color: Velocity<br />

Elevated surface<br />

@ Outlet<br />

Color: TKE<br />

Iso surface<br />

Vel = 15 m/s<br />

Color: Pressure<br />

Clip plane<br />

z const.<br />

Color: Velocity<br />

Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary


Functional Buck: Requirements<br />

Animated section cut:<br />

Animated streamline:<br />

Animated iso surface:<br />

LOD 3: 4000 facets<br />

LOD 2: 7500 facets<br />

LOD 1: 11500 facets<br />

Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary


OEM/Supplier Integration<br />

• A repetitive iterations where reference geometry and<br />

updated design geometry is exchanged until a final<br />

design solution is agreed on.<br />

Supplier Product<br />

OEM Environment<br />

A small set of parts to design:<br />

In an extremely complex environment:<br />

•11 End Items<br />

•80 CAD Files, 399 Versions<br />

•Average of 0.44 versions per day<br />

•43 CAD Assemblies and multiple versions<br />

•Average of 1.73 versions per day<br />

•~30 minutes per download<br />

•4.3 hours per week for downloads<br />

Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary


JT Enabler Supplier Integration (cont.)<br />

• Simplified product representation such as JT just make sense.<br />

• Suppliers use it anyways<br />

• Immediate benefits are fairly clear (just to list a few):<br />

– Size and performance<br />

– IP protection<br />

– Available as asset<br />

– Streamline the process<br />

• Not Always, but in many design iteration scenarios Devil in the details<br />

Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary


Engineering 3D Efficiency<br />

• Engineers need modeling capabilities but don’t have time to become and maintain<br />

proficiency in parametric modeling<br />

Engineering<br />

Request<br />

CAD<br />

Approval?<br />

Marked up<br />

Released<br />

Final Design in <strong>PDM</strong><br />

<strong>PDM</strong><br />

• Engineers are actually isolated from the design process by the<br />

CAD system<br />

• Engineers regularly waiting for CAD Designer to execute design<br />

• Mark up is not communicating in 3D – It’s marking 3D<br />

Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary


3D Design Capable Engineer (cont.)<br />

• Direct Modeling – Intuitive, Simple to use with a short learning curve.<br />

• Direct Modeling addresses users that need to be engaged in the design process but are not full<br />

time CAD users which:<br />

• Work with the CAD the whole day<br />

• Require extensive CAD training<br />

• Regularly interact with the CAD tool to retain proficiency<br />

• So for engineers that’s great.<br />

– No need to master a complicated CAD whose most capabilities they don’t need<br />

– Don’t have to wait to get the CAD folks to make a simplified model or modified a fully-featured model<br />

because they can do it themselves.<br />

• Engineers could…<br />

– Perform a rapid product creation, modification and analysis.<br />

– Simplify design to meet CAE analysis<br />

– Develop proposals and studies<br />

– Perform most functions in a discoverable manner<br />

– Don’t have time so minimal or no training is desirable<br />

Enabling non CAD users with 3D data by:<br />

Enabling some level of editing in the visualization tools<br />

Enabling Direct Modeling integration with CAD data management<br />

Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary 23


Mobility 3D Visualization<br />

• Preliminary technical assessment<br />

• JT-<strong>enabled</strong> mobile devices<br />

• Tablet apps in the PLM space<br />

• <strong>Ford</strong>'s 3D geometry and product data<br />

• Tablet overall role as engineering tool<br />

• Very promising, It’s just a matter of time and it’s just<br />

around the corner<br />

• So we need to prepare.<br />

Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary


Key Enabler:<br />

Open Standards<br />

• Openness enables Innovation<br />

• Standards enables Openness<br />

OEM Commitment to Support ISO JT Standardization (Oct, 2010)<br />

JT and STEP - Automotive view:<br />

• Industry requires standard-based visualization solutions: JT<br />

• JT needs an XML-backbone: STEP<br />

CODEX of PLM Openness<br />

STEP AP 242 XML and JT will enable lightweight data exchange<br />

STEP AP 242 XML for product structure , meta, kinematic data etc.<br />

JT as lightweight visualization format for 3D industrial data<br />

Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary


iweitzer@ford.com<br />

Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!