PDM enabled Interoperability @ Ford - GPDIS
PDM enabled Interoperability @ Ford - GPDIS
PDM enabled Interoperability @ Ford - GPDIS
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
PLM-Driven 3D<br />
<strong>Interoperability</strong> @ <strong>Ford</strong><br />
Strategy & Opportunities<br />
Ilan Weitzer<br />
<strong>Ford</strong> Motor Co.<br />
BOEING is a trademark of Boeing Management Company<br />
Copyright © 2012 Boeing. All rights reserved.<br />
Copyright © 2012 Northrop Grumman Corporation. All rights reserved.<br />
<strong>GPDIS</strong>_2012.ppt | 1
Topics<br />
Global Product Data <strong>Interoperability</strong> Summit | 2012<br />
• PLM <strong>Interoperability</strong><br />
• Current Architecture<br />
• Opportunities<br />
– Product Visualization<br />
– CAE Visualization<br />
– Engineering 3D Efficiency<br />
– Suppliers Integration<br />
– 3D Mobility<br />
– Openness and Standards<br />
• Discussion<br />
BOEING is a trademark of Boeing Management Company<br />
Copyright © 2012 Boeing. All rights reserved.<br />
Copyright © 2012 Northrop Grumman Corporation. All rights reserved.<br />
<strong>GPDIS</strong>_2012.ppt | 2
1.Geometry and<br />
Topology<br />
1.Geometry and<br />
Topology<br />
3.CAD metadata<br />
(PMI,<br />
annotation ,<br />
Weld, layers &<br />
groups)<br />
4. Interface to ancillary<br />
products (CAx,<br />
EESE, etc.)<br />
PLM <strong>Interoperability</strong> - Overview<br />
• A Global product strategy relies on a global PLM strategy<br />
• A global PLM strategy is <strong>enabled</strong> by interoperability<br />
• <strong>Interoperability</strong> must be achieved at all levels<br />
• Visualization as key enabler<br />
Primary Target<br />
Next: Re-mastering<br />
9. Common user<br />
interface,<br />
common data<br />
model<br />
7 <strong>PDM</strong> driven data<br />
exchange, PMI<br />
independent of CAD tool<br />
5. Design-in-Context<br />
– Tessellation,<br />
Precise, On-<br />
Demand<br />
2. Assembly<br />
Hierarchy<br />
6. Associativity support<br />
(change notification)<br />
8. CAD History Tree, Design<br />
Intent, geometry<br />
supporting info<br />
2. Assembly<br />
Hierarchy<br />
Level<br />
1<br />
2 3 4<br />
5<br />
6 7 8<br />
• Increasing Levels of complexity<br />
Level-1<br />
Data & Tools <strong>Interoperability</strong><br />
across core design and<br />
engineering activities<br />
• Product Definition (Geometry)<br />
• PMI & Metadata<br />
• CAD Attributes<br />
• <strong>PDM</strong>-Enabled<br />
8<br />
9<br />
Level-2<br />
<strong>Interoperability</strong> across<br />
all PLM Components,<br />
Processes & users<br />
• <strong>PDM</strong><br />
• BOM<br />
• MFG Systems and Processes<br />
• Requirements & Assumptions<br />
• Functional, Logical & Physical<br />
• Concept/Styling/Marketing/Sale<br />
Level-3<br />
<strong>Interoperability</strong> across<br />
global vehicle programs<br />
• Global Platform<br />
• Global Commodities<br />
• Global Release & Change<br />
Management<br />
• Enabled by Standard<br />
Information Model<br />
Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary 3
PLM Driven <strong>Interoperability</strong><br />
Design/Styling<br />
TCe<br />
JT<br />
JT<br />
Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary
JT Enabled Multi-CAD Design in Context<br />
• Visualization-based interoperability<br />
• Reuse of existing assets<br />
• Multi-CAD / Single <strong>PDM</strong> Environment<br />
• JT Generation via Tce Translation Services<br />
• Seamless and Transparent<br />
• On the fly JT read capabilities in V5 and IDEAS<br />
• Seamless Integration on consumption<br />
• C2C is still around, but in diminishing capacity<br />
Teamcenter Engineering<br />
JT Read/Write<br />
IDEAS<br />
CATIA V5<br />
Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary
Evolution of Visualization at <strong>Ford</strong><br />
Key Milestones<br />
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002<br />
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008<br />
2009<br />
2010<br />
2011<br />
2012<br />
Clearance Management<br />
Systematic analysis of clearance / clash<br />
Immersive Buck<br />
Digital Human with motion capture<br />
Web-Based PC Access<br />
Broad web-based access to Digital Mockup<br />
Automatic Tessellation<br />
Continuous, automatic generation of a general purpose digital mockup<br />
Distributed Visualization<br />
More frequent generation of the digital mockup available on numerous visualization servers<br />
Manual Digital Buck<br />
Periodic manual generation of the digital mockup to support major program milestones<br />
JT for CAD <strong>Interoperability</strong><br />
Design-in-context<br />
<strong>PDM</strong> based Visualization<br />
Visualization imbedded in the <strong>PDM</strong><br />
TCBuck<br />
LTDR<br />
Enhanced <strong>PDM</strong> Vis<br />
Suppliers Integration<br />
Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary 6
Current <strong>Ford</strong> PLM Environment<br />
Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary
Integrated C3PNG Digital Environment<br />
TCe<br />
Mfg Rich Client<br />
BOM<br />
Authoring<br />
Rich Client<br />
Thin Client<br />
FIDES<br />
AVBOM<br />
ICM - Integrated Clash<br />
Management<br />
Issue<br />
Management<br />
IDEAS<br />
CATIA V5<br />
Multi-CAD<br />
TC Vis<br />
Clash Mgmt<br />
Req. Mgmt<br />
Digital Prototyping<br />
Integrated<br />
Reporting<br />
Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary
JT Pipeline – DPA Process View<br />
Digital Pre-Assembly: Geometric Verification & Compliance to Standards<br />
DPA Assessments<br />
DPA 0<br />
Function<br />
• Dynamic<br />
displacement<br />
• Movement<br />
• Heat<br />
Clearances<br />
• Variation<br />
DPA Owner:<br />
Block Leaders<br />
DPA 1<br />
Static<br />
Nominal<br />
Taisen<br />
• Clearances<br />
• Positional<br />
correctness<br />
• Interface<br />
completeness<br />
DPA Owner:<br />
Block Leaders<br />
DPA 2 DPA 3 DPA 4 DPA 5<br />
Craftsmanship Tolerance Service<br />
Mfg/<br />
Assembly<br />
• Design<br />
Appearance<br />
• Margins/<br />
Flushness<br />
• Grains / Gloss<br />
DPA Owner:<br />
Craftsmanship<br />
• Formability<br />
• VSA Focus<br />
• Removal<br />
• Assembly<br />
studies agreed<br />
• Process<br />
Access<br />
by Design,<br />
• Plant Floor<br />
• Damageability<br />
Program & VO<br />
Ergonomics<br />
DPA Owner:<br />
Craftsmanship<br />
DPA Owner:<br />
FCSD<br />
DPA Owner: VO<br />
& SBU ME<br />
DPA 6<br />
Package/<br />
Ergo<br />
• Ingress/egress<br />
• Reach<br />
• Vision<br />
• Accessibility<br />
• Spatial<br />
Relationships<br />
DPA Owner:<br />
Basic Design<br />
Package<br />
UN & UP UN & UP UP<br />
UP<br />
UN & UP UN & UP UN & UP<br />
Requirements<br />
Verification<br />
Functional<br />
Specifications<br />
• Material<br />
• Key Life<br />
• Component<br />
Nominal Taisen<br />
• Component<br />
System &<br />
interface<br />
requirements.<br />
Craftsmanship<br />
Specifications<br />
• Exterior<br />
• Interior<br />
• Under Hood<br />
Appearance<br />
Tolerance<br />
• Acceptance<br />
Criteria for<br />
Component<br />
Variation<br />
Service<br />
Specification<br />
• Component<br />
Standards for<br />
Service<br />
Mfg/Assembly<br />
• Component Mfg<br />
Standards<br />
• Control specs<br />
• DFA Req<br />
Package/Ergo<br />
• Component<br />
Ergo Req<br />
• Component<br />
Package<br />
Standards<br />
Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary 9
JT Pipeline - Systems View<br />
JT Enabled <strong>Interoperability</strong> across the product creation tool sets<br />
TCe<br />
PD/KBE<br />
Color Buck<br />
PDV<br />
Jack<br />
TCe<br />
TC Buck<br />
E2Ks<br />
Indirect<br />
Jack PDV<br />
Jack TCe<br />
Services<br />
IsoDraw<br />
3DVia Composer<br />
Adobe Illustr.<br />
PDV<br />
3DsMax<br />
AutoTrol<br />
TCViTransCabels<br />
TCVis<br />
VisJack<br />
VSP<br />
Marketing<br />
& Sale<br />
JT pipeline<br />
Mfg<br />
TCM<br />
eMS<br />
Jack<br />
FIDES<br />
Flexible PartViewer<br />
EMS Planner<br />
PTO<br />
CAE Mashing<br />
TessOnDemand<br />
ePEds<br />
PTO Buck<br />
Corp Design<br />
ICIDO<br />
Opticore<br />
Bunkspeed<br />
Showcase<br />
MotionBuilder<br />
Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary
Significance of <strong>Interoperability</strong><br />
Full Vehicle<br />
Buck<br />
(1996)<br />
PD and Mfg<br />
Illustrations<br />
(2007)<br />
Plant<br />
Visualization<br />
(1998)<br />
Marketing<br />
For 20 Vehicles<br />
(2007)<br />
1 st Buck<br />
“On Road”<br />
(1999)<br />
1 st Marketing<br />
Process from JT<br />
(2006)<br />
Photo-Realistic, Engineering<br />
LIVE Reviews<br />
(2007)<br />
Ergo-based<br />
Serviceability<br />
(2000)<br />
Service Tools<br />
“InClass”<br />
(2006)<br />
Mfg PMI<br />
(2000)<br />
Released<br />
Content<br />
(2000)<br />
Digital<br />
Pre-Assembly<br />
(2005)<br />
Service<br />
Manuals<br />
(2001)<br />
Warranty Part<br />
Support Desk<br />
(2001)<br />
<strong>Ford</strong> GT<br />
Marketing<br />
Swept Volume (2004)<br />
for Serviceability<br />
(2005)<br />
Dealers<br />
Catalogs<br />
(2003)<br />
“Shadowed”<br />
Under hood<br />
Drawings<br />
(2007)<br />
Interactive<br />
Service Pubs<br />
(2008)<br />
Web-based Build<br />
and Price<br />
(2008)<br />
<strong>PDM</strong>-bases<br />
Visualization<br />
(2009)<br />
Future:<br />
HD3D, AWS,<br />
Mobility<br />
Immersive Buck<br />
(2007)<br />
Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary 11
Summary: Visualization Is <strong>Interoperability</strong><br />
• Product Visualization - Lightweight product data everywhere<br />
– Ability to move native geometry interactively to the visualization tool, enabling<br />
real-time viewing and analysis<br />
• Verification and Digital Prototyping<br />
– Digital Pre Assembly (DPA) Process enabler<br />
• Visualization-based CAD <strong>Interoperability</strong><br />
– Data sharing and collaboration across multiple design and engineering disciplines<br />
using efficient product data representation.<br />
– Design-in-Context with reference data<br />
• Ability to work with geometry in one CAD tool with reference geometry from another<br />
CAD tool<br />
• Geometry pipeline to engineering applications and products (CAD, KBE,<br />
CAE, Illustration, etc.)<br />
• Product pipeline to Manufacturing applications<br />
• Product representation for photo-realistic and VR applications<br />
• Legacy Migration & Archival<br />
– Bridging between next generation and carryover systems and Long-term data<br />
retention<br />
– IDEAS and PDGS archived as JT<br />
Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary 12
What are some of the Opportunities<br />
• PLM <strong>Interoperability</strong><br />
• Current Architecture<br />
• Opportunities<br />
– Product Visualization<br />
– CAE Visualization<br />
– Engineering Efficiency<br />
– Suppliers Integration<br />
– 3D Mobility<br />
– Openness and Standards<br />
• Discussion<br />
Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary
• Product Visualization Supports Decision making<br />
• <strong>Interoperability</strong> is manual and customized<br />
• Integration with PLM is just kicking off<br />
Product Visualization<br />
Concept<br />
Design and<br />
Simulation<br />
Marketing<br />
Sale<br />
Styling<br />
Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary
Example: Advanced Material Interop<br />
• In the PLM today, CAD applications and<br />
Technical Visualization (Mock-up)<br />
applications have been integrated with <strong>PDM</strong>.<br />
• Other visualization applications supporting<br />
High End Visualization, Photo-Realistic<br />
Rendering, Video Animation, Virtual Reality<br />
have not been integrated.<br />
• Most of the HEV systems are typically used<br />
standalone with repetitive manual effort<br />
required to manage and update information.<br />
• So best in class capabilities are typically custom-made with data conversion optimized for<br />
each company.<br />
• There is a growing need to improve integration and work flows for visualization<br />
applications that utilize current data from the <strong>PDM</strong>/PLM environment.<br />
• There is a case for <strong>PDM</strong>/PLM driven Visualization with a goal that applications integrated<br />
with <strong>PDM</strong>/PLM systems have a consistent and predictable set of visualization behaviors.<br />
• There are no industry wide requirements for PLM integration of Visualization Systems &<br />
Tools<br />
Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary
Advanced Color Material - Automotive POCs<br />
GM’s POC Phase 1<br />
GM, Autodesk, RTT, Siemens<br />
Upstream/Downstream Vis<br />
<strong>Ford</strong>’s POC Phase 2<br />
<strong>Ford</strong>, Autodesk, Theorem, Siemens<br />
• JTOpen’s effort<br />
• Feasibility for using GUMID as a<br />
persistent color attributes index for<br />
consistent visualization<br />
• Feasibility to interop, associate, use and<br />
maintain the color attributes during<br />
engineering workflows phases<br />
(Teamcenter, TCVis, V5)<br />
• GAAG’s Product Visualization<br />
TCe<br />
Engineering Vis<br />
Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary
CAE Visualization<br />
• Functional Buck<br />
• Better communication of CAE results<br />
into the PD decision making process<br />
• Improved robustness and efficiency of CAE<br />
model build process via closer link to the<br />
<strong>PDM</strong> system<br />
• Improved quality of CAE analysis based<br />
on better integration on geometrical<br />
and non-geometrical data<br />
• Improved consistency of the design/<br />
package assessment by enabling a<br />
integrated geometrical and functional<br />
assessment<br />
• Improved communication of complex<br />
CAE results by enabling a visualization<br />
in an immersive VR environment<br />
Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary 17
Visualization in the Digital Buck<br />
What is possible today (a CFD Example)<br />
EnSight geom EnSight results CAD geom<br />
Clip plane<br />
y const.<br />
Color: Velocity<br />
Elevated surface<br />
@ Outlet<br />
Color: TKE<br />
Iso surface<br />
Vel = 15 m/s<br />
Color: Pressure<br />
Clip plane<br />
z const.<br />
Color: Velocity<br />
Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary
Functional Buck: Requirements<br />
Animated section cut:<br />
Animated streamline:<br />
Animated iso surface:<br />
LOD 3: 4000 facets<br />
LOD 2: 7500 facets<br />
LOD 1: 11500 facets<br />
Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary
OEM/Supplier Integration<br />
• A repetitive iterations where reference geometry and<br />
updated design geometry is exchanged until a final<br />
design solution is agreed on.<br />
Supplier Product<br />
OEM Environment<br />
A small set of parts to design:<br />
In an extremely complex environment:<br />
•11 End Items<br />
•80 CAD Files, 399 Versions<br />
•Average of 0.44 versions per day<br />
•43 CAD Assemblies and multiple versions<br />
•Average of 1.73 versions per day<br />
•~30 minutes per download<br />
•4.3 hours per week for downloads<br />
Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary
JT Enabler Supplier Integration (cont.)<br />
• Simplified product representation such as JT just make sense.<br />
• Suppliers use it anyways<br />
• Immediate benefits are fairly clear (just to list a few):<br />
– Size and performance<br />
– IP protection<br />
– Available as asset<br />
– Streamline the process<br />
• Not Always, but in many design iteration scenarios Devil in the details<br />
Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary
Engineering 3D Efficiency<br />
• Engineers need modeling capabilities but don’t have time to become and maintain<br />
proficiency in parametric modeling<br />
Engineering<br />
Request<br />
CAD<br />
Approval?<br />
Marked up<br />
Released<br />
Final Design in <strong>PDM</strong><br />
<strong>PDM</strong><br />
• Engineers are actually isolated from the design process by the<br />
CAD system<br />
• Engineers regularly waiting for CAD Designer to execute design<br />
• Mark up is not communicating in 3D – It’s marking 3D<br />
Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary
3D Design Capable Engineer (cont.)<br />
• Direct Modeling – Intuitive, Simple to use with a short learning curve.<br />
• Direct Modeling addresses users that need to be engaged in the design process but are not full<br />
time CAD users which:<br />
• Work with the CAD the whole day<br />
• Require extensive CAD training<br />
• Regularly interact with the CAD tool to retain proficiency<br />
• So for engineers that’s great.<br />
– No need to master a complicated CAD whose most capabilities they don’t need<br />
– Don’t have to wait to get the CAD folks to make a simplified model or modified a fully-featured model<br />
because they can do it themselves.<br />
• Engineers could…<br />
– Perform a rapid product creation, modification and analysis.<br />
– Simplify design to meet CAE analysis<br />
– Develop proposals and studies<br />
– Perform most functions in a discoverable manner<br />
– Don’t have time so minimal or no training is desirable<br />
Enabling non CAD users with 3D data by:<br />
Enabling some level of editing in the visualization tools<br />
Enabling Direct Modeling integration with CAD data management<br />
Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary 23
Mobility 3D Visualization<br />
• Preliminary technical assessment<br />
• JT-<strong>enabled</strong> mobile devices<br />
• Tablet apps in the PLM space<br />
• <strong>Ford</strong>'s 3D geometry and product data<br />
• Tablet overall role as engineering tool<br />
• Very promising, It’s just a matter of time and it’s just<br />
around the corner<br />
• So we need to prepare.<br />
Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary
Key Enabler:<br />
Open Standards<br />
• Openness enables Innovation<br />
• Standards enables Openness<br />
OEM Commitment to Support ISO JT Standardization (Oct, 2010)<br />
JT and STEP - Automotive view:<br />
• Industry requires standard-based visualization solutions: JT<br />
• JT needs an XML-backbone: STEP<br />
CODEX of PLM Openness<br />
STEP AP 242 XML and JT will enable lightweight data exchange<br />
STEP AP 242 XML for product structure , meta, kinematic data etc.<br />
JT as lightweight visualization format for 3D industrial data<br />
Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary
iweitzer@ford.com<br />
Copyright © <strong>Ford</strong> Motor Company, 2012 - <strong>Ford</strong> Proprietary