09.05.2015 Views

Conjoined Twinning in Orchids - Orchids-World

Conjoined Twinning in Orchids - Orchids-World

Conjoined Twinning in Orchids - Orchids-World

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Conjo<strong>in</strong>ed</strong> <strong>Tw<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Orchids</strong><br />

Six months ago, mid 2012, I reported the existence of two <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

stems/pseudo-bulbs develop<strong>in</strong>g contemporaneously but not conjo<strong>in</strong>ed from one<br />

“bud”/“lead” <strong>in</strong> a cattleya hybrid. Numerous other orchid growers have now<br />

confirmed this.<br />

Today, I report for the first time ever the existence of conjo<strong>in</strong>ed tw<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> orchids.<br />

The orchid is a Cattlianthe: Cattlianthe (Ctt) Duckitt Ruby<br />

<strong>Conjo<strong>in</strong>ed</strong> tw<strong>in</strong>s is a rare and fasc<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g malformation observed not only <strong>in</strong><br />

humans but also <strong>in</strong> most warm and colt blooded animals, like mammals, fishes,<br />

birds, reptiles, etc; to my knowledge, it has never been observed or reported <strong>in</strong><br />

plants, this is the first time.<br />

This malformation was noticed accidently six months ago, when the new lead/<br />

shoot grew <strong>in</strong> a horseshoe shape rather than straight up as it is normally expected.<br />

I knew that someth<strong>in</strong>g was out of place and I separate the plant to follow its<br />

progress.<br />

Over the follow<strong>in</strong>g two months the stem/pseudo-bulb/bract, as it grew,<br />

changed its shape numerous times but always rema<strong>in</strong>ed curved.<br />

The third month, the stem showed a vertical “division” <strong>in</strong>to two conjo<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

“stems” (Photo 1), clearly <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that someth<strong>in</strong>g extraord<strong>in</strong>ary was tak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

place.<br />

Photo 1. <strong>Conjo<strong>in</strong>ed</strong> tw<strong>in</strong> stems/pseudo-bulbs.<br />

Two months later, each of the conjo<strong>in</strong>ed tw<strong>in</strong> stems, produced it’s own<br />

‘bract”. (Photo 2).


Photo 2. <strong>Conjo<strong>in</strong>ed</strong> tw<strong>in</strong> bract (like a snake or lizard with two heads.)<br />

Photo 3. The two clearly separated bracts each with it’s own sheath.


I realized that I was witness<strong>in</strong>g for the first time the development of a<br />

conjo<strong>in</strong>ed tw<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> a plant, an orchid <strong>in</strong> this case.<br />

The reasons beh<strong>in</strong>d the cont<strong>in</strong>uously shape chang<strong>in</strong>g of the “bract”, became<br />

also clear. It was obvious that the two conjo<strong>in</strong>ed “stems”, although both were<br />

grow<strong>in</strong>g contemporaneously, they were compet<strong>in</strong>g aga<strong>in</strong>st each other, as both were<br />

<strong>in</strong> many ways <strong>in</strong>dependent. It is not different to a snake, lizard or mammal form<strong>in</strong>g<br />

two heads on one s<strong>in</strong>gle body.<br />

Today, six months, each bract has it’s own f<strong>in</strong>al growth and sheath and<br />

should, theoretically at least, given time produce a flower. The union, <strong>in</strong> this case,<br />

is symmetrical and the conjo<strong>in</strong>ed bracts are equal.<br />

TWO WEEKS LATER<br />

A picture = 1000 words.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!