China - 中国国际贸易促进委员会
China - 中国国际贸易促进委员会
China - 中国国际贸易促进委员会
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
the US economy, businesses that had<br />
invested in <strong>China</strong> were returning to the<br />
US market.<br />
But others cited rising labor costs<br />
as a reason.<br />
<strong>China</strong> announced in April 2010<br />
that it would try to attract more foreign<br />
investment in the high-tech, energy and<br />
service sectors, a switch in focus from<br />
low-end manufacturing.<br />
“We expect the US to encourage<br />
more high-end investment into <strong>China</strong>,<br />
particularly in the service sector,” Yao<br />
said.<br />
The White Paper also expressed<br />
their confidence in the opportunities<br />
in next 5 years in <strong>China</strong>. It said that<br />
<strong>China</strong>’s 12th Five-Year Plan realistically<br />
proposes the goal that <strong>China</strong> grow<br />
at a slower rate of seven percent per<br />
year and shift to a domestic demanddriven<br />
model. This will require growth<br />
of house-hold income, development<br />
of services, and large investments in<br />
education, healthcare and the pension<br />
system.<br />
There will also be large investments<br />
in energy efficiency and new<br />
technology intended to increase productivity.<br />
Senior leaders have stated that<br />
successful execution of the 12th Five-<br />
Year Plan necessitates deepening and<br />
accelerating reform and opening, and<br />
giving greater scope for foreign capital<br />
in <strong>China</strong>’s markets.<br />
Still with some worries<br />
The AmCham <strong>China</strong> listed the<br />
problems that their member companies<br />
confronted in <strong>China</strong> and proposed<br />
some suggestions for both governments.<br />
According to their survey, the top five<br />
business challenges were:<br />
• Bureaucracy,<br />
• Management-level human resources constraints,<br />
• Unclear laws and regulations,<br />
• Inconsistent regulatory interpretation, and<br />
• Intellectual property rights (IPR) infringement.<br />
It is striking that three of the top five challenges relate directly to government<br />
performance and one relates indirectly in the sense that enforcement by<br />
the authorities has been inadequate to deter intellectual property rights infringement.<br />
This theme continues if issues are looked at further down the list:<br />
Corruption,<br />
• Obtaining required licenses,<br />
• Non-management level human resources,<br />
• National protectionism,<br />
• Local protectionism, and<br />
• Diffculty enforcing contract terms.<br />
When asked about the opinion on the problems and suggestions that the<br />
White Paper proposed to the Chinese Government, Yao Jian, spokesman of the<br />
MOFCOM expressed most of their suggestions were reasonable and the Chinese<br />
Government should take measures to improve.<br />
Christian Murck, President of AmCham <strong>China</strong>, expressed his great appreciation<br />
on Chinese government’s extension for the 6-month campaign of crashing<br />
down IPR breaching acts.<br />
At the 3rd round of S&E D, Chinese Government also pledged to strengthen<br />
the IPR protection and further improve the business environment etc.<br />
While on the high-tech products export control issue, <strong>China</strong> have been urging<br />
the US to ease the control. The AmCham <strong>China</strong> also expressed that the overly<br />
restrictive regulations and policies result in ineffective controls and unintended consequences,<br />
such as lost US export opportunities and diminished revenues for US<br />
companies that harm US economic and national security goals. Before the S&E D,<br />
Christian Murck, told the reporter that they would do some lobby in Washington<br />
on this issue. At this round of Dialogue, the US promised to ease the control and<br />
try to acknowledge <strong>China</strong>’s market economy status as soon as possible.<br />
S&E D should help further mutual economic cooperation<br />
On May 10, the two-day 3 rd round of Sino-US Strategic & Economic Dialogue<br />
ended in Washington with the two sides signing 112 agreements, of which<br />
64 are in economic sector and 48 are on strategic level. U.S.-<strong>China</strong> Comprehensive<br />
Framework for Promoting Strong, Sustainable and Balanced Growth and Economic<br />
Cooperation was also signed in this round of Dialogue. “The United States<br />
and <strong>China</strong> affirm that both countries will, based on common interest, promote<br />
more extensive economic cooperation, from a strategic, long-term, and overarching<br />
perspective, to work together to build a comprehensive and mutually beneficial economic<br />
partnership, add to prosperity and welfare in the two countries, and achieve<br />
strong, sustainable, and balanced growth of the world economy,” noted the framework.<br />
Both countries aimed at taking measures to promote more<br />
balanced bilateral trade, resolving trade and investment disputes<br />
in a constructive and cooperative manner, exploring new cooperation<br />
opportunities in the process of transforming and restructuring<br />
their economies, developing sub-national economic cooperation and<br />
deepening cooperation in the financial sector.<br />
“Generally, this round of dialogue is very positive. And both<br />
<strong>China</strong> and US tried to avoid quarrel on the dispute, but more on<br />
dialogue, pledging on reducing the barrier for mutual investment<br />
and trade exchange in their respective domestic countries. Though<br />
I am not optimistic about the US’ commitment on acknowledging<br />
<strong>China</strong>’s market economy status, I still say the Dialogue is positive<br />
and helpful for the cooperation of the two countries.” Tu Xinquan,<br />
told the reporter.<br />
19