15.05.2015 Views

Regional Tree Initiatives - Arbor Day Foundation

Regional Tree Initiatives - Arbor Day Foundation

Regional Tree Initiatives - Arbor Day Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chicago <strong>Regional</strong> Forest


Openlands is a regional conservation<br />

organization, serving the metropolitan<br />

Chicago area and focused on the protection<br />

of and advocacy for green space through a<br />

variety of programs.


The Morton <strong>Arbor</strong>etum<br />

Founded in 1922<br />

1700 acres<br />

222,000 plants with 4,300 different taxa<br />

The Center for <strong>Tree</strong> Science<br />

Research and Conservation<br />

Educational Outreach<br />

Partnerships


A Community Asset<br />

All trees – whether on public or private land<br />

are part of the urban and community forest.<br />

Our trees are a community asset.<br />

It takes a “community” to protect, manage<br />

and enhance our forest.


Urban and<br />

Community Forestry<br />

a holistic approach to the management of<br />

trees and forest resources as green<br />

infrastructure in and around community<br />

ecosystems for the benefits they provide.


<strong>Tree</strong>s and forest of Chicago region are<br />

under threat:<br />

• Insects<br />

• Disease<br />

• Invasive species<br />

• Climate<br />

• Development<br />

• Changing infrastructure


<strong>Tree</strong> Census: To better understand the<br />

forest resource and its values<br />

Use the USDA Forest<br />

Service, Northern<br />

Research Station –<br />

Urban Forest Effects<br />

(UFORE) model, now<br />

known as i-<strong>Tree</strong> Eco<br />

• Forest structure<br />

• Potential risk to forest from<br />

insects or diseases<br />

• Air pollution removal<br />

• Carbon storage<br />

• Annual carbon removal<br />

(sequestration)<br />

• Changes in building energy use


<strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Tree</strong> Census:<br />

• Informs discussion of trends<br />

• Informs policy<br />

• Informs the value of tree services to<br />

constituencies who may not value trees but<br />

value their services


<strong>Regional</strong> Forest Summary (<strong>Tree</strong>s)<br />

Number of trees 157,142,000<br />

<strong>Tree</strong> and shrub cover 21.0%<br />

<strong>Tree</strong> cover 15.5%


<strong>Regional</strong> Forest Summary<br />

Most common species<br />

European buckthorn,<br />

green ash, box elder,<br />

black cherry, American elm<br />

Percentage of trees < 6” dbh 73.3%


<strong>Regional</strong> Forest Summary<br />

Pollution removal – trees 18,080 tons/yr ($205 m/yr)<br />

<strong>Tree</strong>s and shrubs 24,179 tons/yr ($274 m/yr)<br />

VOC emissions<br />

11,976 tons/yr<br />

Carbon storage<br />

16.9 million tons ($349 m/yr)<br />

Carbon sequestration 677,000 tons/yr ($14 m/yr)<br />

Building energy reduction $44 m/yr<br />

Reduced carbon emissions$1.3 m/yr<br />

Compensatory value $51.2 billion


Land Use – Chicago Region<br />

CTI<br />

14.0%<br />

Open Space<br />

23.0%<br />

Agriculture<br />

32.9%<br />

Residential<br />

30.1%<br />

CTI = Commercial/transportation/institutional


<strong>Tree</strong> Species Distribution<br />

other species<br />

41.0%<br />

European<br />

buckthorn<br />

28.2%<br />

Green ash<br />

5.5%<br />

Boxelder<br />

5.5%<br />

Northern red oak<br />

2.0%<br />

Silver maple<br />

2.0%<br />

White ash<br />

2.6%<br />

Amur honeysuckle<br />

2.1%<br />

Black cherry<br />

4.9%<br />

American elm<br />

3.4%<br />

Sugar maple<br />

2.8%


Number of <strong>Tree</strong>s by Land Use<br />

Number of <strong>Tree</strong>s (millions)<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Number of trees<br />

<strong>Tree</strong>s per acre<br />

Open Space Residential CTI Agriculture<br />

Land Use<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Density (trees per acre)


1,600<br />

Leaf Area by Land Use<br />

2.5<br />

Leaf Area (thousand acres)<br />

1,400<br />

1,200<br />

1,000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

Leaf area<br />

Leaf area index<br />

Residential Open Space CTI Agriculture<br />

Land Use<br />

2<br />

1.5<br />

1<br />

0.5<br />

0<br />

Leaf Area Index (LAI)


50<br />

More Leaf Area on Large <strong>Tree</strong>s<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

Percent<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Leaf area<br />

Abundance<br />

1-3 3-6 6-9 9-12 12-15 15-18 18-21 21-24 24-27 27-30 30+<br />

Diameter Class (d.b.h. in inches)


What happens when large trees are lost?<br />

35,000<br />

Number of <strong>Tree</strong>s (thousands)<br />

30,000<br />

25,000<br />

20,000<br />

15,000<br />

10,000<br />

5,000<br />

0<br />

Diameter Class (d.b.h.)<br />

< 3 inches<br />

> 18 inches<br />

Species


Number of <strong>Tree</strong>s on Illinois Invasive List<br />

Number of <strong>Tree</strong>s (millions)<br />

50<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Species


Pollution Removed<br />

(thousand tons / year)<br />

8<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Pollution removed<br />

Value<br />

Annual Air Pollution Removal<br />

CO NO2 O3 PM10 SO2<br />

Pollutant<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Value (million dollars / year)


Annual Volatile Organic Compound Emissions<br />

Genera<br />

Quercus<br />

Acer<br />

Populus<br />

Picea<br />

Juglans<br />

Rhamnus<br />

Robinia<br />

Fraxinus<br />

Pinus<br />

Ulmus<br />

VOCs Emitted<br />

Isoprene<br />

Monoterpene<br />

Other VOCs<br />

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5<br />

VOCs Emitted (thousand tons)


Annual Carbon Sequestration<br />

70<br />

1,400<br />

Sequestration (thousand<br />

tons / year)<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

European<br />

buckthorn<br />

Carbon sequestration<br />

Value<br />

Boxelder Black cherry Silver maple Bur oak White oak Northern red<br />

oak<br />

Green ash<br />

Eastern Black walnut<br />

cottonwood<br />

1,200<br />

1,000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

Value (housand dollars /<br />

year)


Annual Carbon Storage<br />

2.0<br />

1.8<br />

Carbon storage<br />

Value<br />

50<br />

45<br />

1.6<br />

40<br />

Storage (million tons)<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

Value (million dollars)<br />

0.0<br />

Bur oak Silver maple White oak Boxelder Eastern<br />

cottonwood<br />

Northern red<br />

oak<br />

Black cherry Green ash Siberian elm Honeylocust<br />

0


Average Carbon Storage and Sequestration<br />

Average Storage (thousand lbs)<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

0-3 3-6 6-9 9-12 12-15 15-18 18-21 21-24 24-27 27-30 30+<br />

Carbon storage<br />

Carbon sequestration<br />

Diameter Class (d.b.h. in inches)<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Average Sequestration (lbs /<br />

year)


Structural or Compensatory Value<br />

7<br />

Compensatory Value<br />

(billions of dollars)<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

Bur oak White oak Silver maple Green ash Northern<br />

red oak<br />

European<br />

buckthorn<br />

Black cherry Boxelder<br />

Eastern Honeylocust<br />

cottonwood


Number of <strong>Tree</strong>s (millions)<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

<strong>Tree</strong>s at risk<br />

Compensatory value<br />

Disease Risk<br />

ALB GM EAB OW DED<br />

Insect/Disease<br />

20<br />

18<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

Compensatory Value (billions<br />

of dollars)


25<br />

Disease Risk by Land Use<br />

Number of Host <strong>Tree</strong>s<br />

(millions)<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

Agriculture CTI Open Space Residential<br />

Insect/Disease<br />

ALB GM EAB DED OW<br />

Land Use


14<br />

Most Common Street <strong>Tree</strong>s<br />

12<br />

Street <strong>Tree</strong> Population<br />

(percent)<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

Green ash<br />

European<br />

buckthorn<br />

Norway<br />

maple<br />

Honeylocust Silver maple White ash<br />

Littleleaf<br />

linden<br />

Northern<br />

hackberry<br />

Slippery elm Red maple


Chicago <strong>Regional</strong> Forest Summary<br />

Feature<br />

Measure<br />

Number of trees 157,142,000<br />

<strong>Tree</strong> and shrub cover 21.0%<br />

<strong>Tree</strong> cover 15.5%<br />

Most common species<br />

European buckthorn, green ash, boxelder,<br />

black cherry, American elm<br />

Percentage of trees < 6-inches dbh 73.3%<br />

Pollution removal - trees<br />

18,080 tons/year ($205 million/year)<br />

<strong>Tree</strong>s and shrubs*<br />

24,170 tons/year ($274 million / year)<br />

VOC emissions<br />

11,976 tons/year<br />

Carbon storage<br />

16.9 million tons ($349 million)<br />

Carbon sequestration<br />

677,000 tons/year ($14.0 million / year)<br />

Building energy reduction<br />

$44.0 million / year<br />

Reduced carbon emissions<br />

$1.3 million / year<br />

Compensatory value<br />

$51.2 billion


Ash <strong>Tree</strong>s by Land Use<br />

Land Use<br />

Number of<br />

<strong>Tree</strong>s<br />

Density<br />

(trees/ac)<br />

% of All <strong>Tree</strong>s<br />

in Land Use<br />

% of Ash <strong>Tree</strong>s in Land<br />

Use with d.b.h. > 18 in.<br />

Agricultural 74,724 0.1 1.1 0.0<br />

CTI a 724,326 2.0 4.7 7.7<br />

Open Space 7,011,331 11.7 8.7 1.0<br />

Residential 4,881,868 6.2 9.0 7.3<br />

Chicago Region 12,692,249 4.8 8.08 3.8<br />

a<br />

CTI = Commercial/Transportation/Institutional


Significant forces for change –<br />

Impacts on region’s forest structure, health and environmental<br />

benefits provided to the 9 million residents.<br />

• insects<br />

• disease<br />

• invasive trees and plants<br />

• land use change<br />

• changing infrastructure<br />

• aging and loss of larger trees<br />

• expansion of opportunistic species<br />

• changes in forest management and use


Morton <strong>Arbor</strong>etum researchers characterize<br />

the Chicago region’s forest as being in a<br />

“transitional state”


<strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Tree</strong> Census:<br />

• inform approaches for regional urban<br />

forest management<br />

• inspire the region to plant and protect<br />

trees<br />

• improve the vigor of the urban forest<br />

• foster collaboration


From <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Tree</strong> Census to<br />

<strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Tree</strong> Initiative<br />

A Healthy<br />

Forest for<br />

Our Future


What is needed to sustain and enhance<br />

the forest?<br />

A comprehensive and integrated<br />

management strategy must be<br />

developed and implemented<br />

across the region.


The <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Tree</strong>s Initiative<br />

Collaborative roadmap to:<br />

conserve<br />

protect<br />

enhance and<br />

sustain the region’s forest


Structure<br />

Working Groups<br />

• <strong>Tree</strong>s and Green Infrastructure<br />

• Stewardship<br />

• Industry Association and Nursery<br />

• Policy<br />

• Research<br />

• Communication


<strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Tree</strong>s Initiative<br />

Who are the partners:<br />

Open Space and Forestry Advocate<br />

<strong>Regional</strong> Planning Organization<br />

Mayors and Communities<br />

Forest Preserve Districts<br />

<strong>Regional</strong> Environmental Advocates<br />

Forest Service<br />

Industry Professionals<br />

Nurseries<br />

Researchers<br />

Department of Natural Resources<br />

Community Advocates


<strong>Tree</strong>s and Green Infrastructure<br />

Chicago Wilderness Green Infrastructure Vision


An interconnected network of natural features<br />

that work collectively to protect ecosystems,<br />

including water quality, air quality, and land<br />

resources.<br />

These features can be as simple as trees planted<br />

in a right-of-way or as complex as large natural<br />

areas.


Co-chaired with the U.S.D.A. Forest Service


Stewardship and <strong>Tree</strong> Planting


Committee Members:<br />

Community Activists<br />

Municipal Staff<br />

Professional Organizations<br />

Youth Leaders<br />

Co-chaired with<br />

Openlands


Develop opportunities for stewardship for<br />

all ages<br />

Build interest with municipalities for<br />

volunteer advocacy<br />

Train children, teens and adults to<br />

advocate for trees


<strong>Tree</strong>Keepers<br />

• Openlands' participation in the <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Tree</strong>s Initiative will<br />

have as its base our volunteer <strong>Tree</strong>Keepers. They are trained<br />

in a seven-session course and volunteer currently within the<br />

City of Chicago. New suburban courses and chapters will be a<br />

goal of the Initiative's Stewardship team.


Research<br />

What we know – What we need to know<br />

Environmental, Social, Psychological


Committee Members:<br />

Researchers from across the country are being<br />

tapped for their particular areas of expertise to<br />

provide input to the strategy.<br />

Co-chaired with the U.S.D.A. Forest<br />

Service


Policy


Review and develop ordinances, strategies and<br />

resources for integration of sound practices for tree<br />

care, management, protection, and planting across<br />

diverse governmental entities.<br />

Co-chaired with The Chicago Metropolitan Agency<br />

for Planning


Beeson’s McHenry County Nursery<br />

Golf illinois.com<br />

Industry Associations and Nurseries<br />

Courtesy of Tom Hauser<br />

St. Michaels Cemetary<br />

Onebigfamilytree.com


Co-chaired with Bartlett <strong>Tree</strong>s


Communication<br />

Getting the “seed” disbursed!<br />

Industry<br />

Associations &<br />

Nurseries<br />

<strong>Tree</strong> Stewardship<br />

and Planting<br />

<strong>Tree</strong>s and Green<br />

Infrastructure<br />

Industry<br />

Associations &<br />

Nurseries<br />

Policy


Pull it all together<br />

Co-chaired with Lake County Forest<br />

Preserve District


Building the <strong>Regional</strong><br />

Strategy<br />

Diverse dialogue<br />

Consensus<br />

<strong>Regional</strong> Support


Result: A Healthy Forest For Our Future<br />

The Morton <strong>Arbor</strong>etum<br />

Lisle, Illinois<br />

Community <strong>Tree</strong>s Program<br />

630-719-2425

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!