17.05.2015 Views

Evaluation of Trial-Level Indigent Defense Systems in Michigan

Evaluation of Trial-Level Indigent Defense Systems in Michigan

Evaluation of Trial-Level Indigent Defense Systems in Michigan

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NATIONAL LEGAL AID & DEFENDER ASSOCIATION<br />

Wayne County:<br />

For example, the Third Circuit <strong>in</strong> Wayne County has a mixed approach when it comes<br />

to cont<strong>in</strong>uous representation and, as a result, only partially complies with ABA Pr<strong>in</strong>ciple<br />

7. In felony cases, the same attorney ostensibly represents the defendant from appo<strong>in</strong>tment<br />

after arraignment on the warrant through sentenc<strong>in</strong>g. However, there are two significant<br />

exceptions - and it is rare for judges to conduct a colloquy with defendants to<br />

obta<strong>in</strong> their waiver <strong>of</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al counsel and agreement to be represented by stand-<strong>in</strong> or replacement<br />

counsel. The first exception is the widespread practice <strong>of</strong> both appo<strong>in</strong>ted and<br />

reta<strong>in</strong>ed attorneys hav<strong>in</strong>g a “stand-<strong>in</strong>” attorney represent the defendant if the appo<strong>in</strong>ted<br />

or reta<strong>in</strong>ed attorney is unavailable. This is usually done at arraignment on the <strong>in</strong>formation,<br />

sometimes for guilty pleas, and sometimes for sett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> a prelim<strong>in</strong>ary hear<strong>in</strong>g date<br />

or trial date (called “bl<strong>in</strong>d draw” for a jury trial, because the case is randomly assigned to<br />

a trial judge). Some judges will not permit stand-<strong>in</strong>s for sett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> trial dates because the<br />

stand-<strong>in</strong>s are frequently un<strong>in</strong>formed as to the orig<strong>in</strong>al attorney’s schedule, status <strong>of</strong> the<br />

case, etc.<br />

One judge said he sees some weakness with how stand-<strong>in</strong> attorneys treat defendants,<br />

particularly those <strong>in</strong> custody, although this judge apparently permits the practice <strong>of</strong> stand<strong>in</strong>s.<br />

The chief judge and the prosecut<strong>in</strong>g attorney said the archaic fee schedule for defense<br />

attorneys is a major cause <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> stand-<strong>in</strong>s (because attorneys accept a large number<br />

<strong>of</strong> appo<strong>in</strong>tments <strong>in</strong> order to compensate for the low fees on each case), and they believe<br />

the problem would be reduced if fees were raised.<br />

One prosecut<strong>in</strong>g attorney said stand-<strong>in</strong>s can actually cause delays <strong>in</strong> the disposition<br />

<strong>of</strong> cases. For example, she said stand-<strong>in</strong> attorneys at the pre-exam (see Sidebar) will not<br />

have the client waive a prelim<strong>in</strong>ary hear<strong>in</strong>g, but when the case gets to the actual prelim<strong>in</strong>ary<br />

hear<strong>in</strong>g day the defendant waives because the orig<strong>in</strong>al attorney is present. Accord<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to the prosecut<strong>in</strong>g attorney, more than 80 percent <strong>of</strong> the prelim<strong>in</strong>ary hear<strong>in</strong>gs are<br />

ultimately waived.<br />

The other exception to vertical representation is when judges sua sponte appo<strong>in</strong>t attorneys<br />

<strong>in</strong> the courtroom as stand-<strong>in</strong>s or remove the appo<strong>in</strong>ted attorney from the case and<br />

appo<strong>in</strong>t an attorney <strong>in</strong> the courtroom. This can happen both for scheduled hear<strong>in</strong>gs and<br />

<strong>in</strong> cases where a defendant appears after the issuance <strong>of</strong> a capias. To the members <strong>of</strong><br />

NLADA’s site team, this appears to be an obvious docket mov<strong>in</strong>g measure. Some appo<strong>in</strong>ted<br />

attorneys say that attorneys who do a lot <strong>of</strong> crim<strong>in</strong>al defense work can competently<br />

represent clients as stand-<strong>in</strong>s.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> the procedures described above, <strong>in</strong>itial <strong>in</strong>terviews with defendants <strong>in</strong> Wayne<br />

County (particularly those <strong>in</strong> custody) are frequently conducted <strong>in</strong> court (or <strong>in</strong> the<br />

“bullpen” – a cell beh<strong>in</strong>d the courtroom). Some <strong>of</strong> the courtrooms have <strong>in</strong>terview rooms<br />

the attorneys can use to meet with clients who are not <strong>in</strong> custody – although frequently<br />

several attorneys are us<strong>in</strong>g the same room simultaneously, either to meet with their own<br />

clients or to make phone calls. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the AOI (arraignment on <strong>in</strong>formation) hear<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

that NLADA site team members observed, most attorneys spoke to their non-custody<br />

clients (whom most <strong>of</strong> them were meet<strong>in</strong>g for the first time) <strong>in</strong> the hallway outside the<br />

courtroom or <strong>in</strong> the back <strong>of</strong> the courtroom. These conversations could be overheard by<br />

anyone with<strong>in</strong> 10 feet or so. Similarly, most <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>-custody clients were <strong>in</strong>terviewed<br />

while they were sitt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the jury box (next to other defendants, bailiffs, and court personnel).<br />

72

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!