17.05.2015 Views

Litigation Process a.. - The Advocates' Society

Litigation Process a.. - The Advocates' Society

Litigation Process a.. - The Advocates' Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- 8 -<br />

substantive testimony is given. If counsel wishing to object on this basis waits until after the<br />

substantive testimony is underway, any lack of qualification, regardless of its extent, will only go<br />

to weight as opposed to admissibility. 20 It is also important to carefully assess the precise area<br />

in which the expert is asking permission to testify. For example, it is important in cases where<br />

the expert is retained to tender evidence with respect to the standard of care in a professional<br />

liability case that the expert be qualified in the same field as that of the defendant.<br />

Qualifications of the Expert<br />

Technical expertise of the expert in the relevant field is essential. It is prudent to seek an<br />

expert who possesses the right balance of education, training and experience. 21<br />

Although an<br />

expert may be highly educated and published, lack of experience in the relevant field may affect<br />

the weight that will be given to his evidence in some cases, particularly those where the issue to<br />

which the expert is testifying is the standard of care in professional liability cases. In such cases,<br />

it is expected that the expert testifying as to the requisite standard of care will be a member of<br />

the defendant’s community of the same experience as the defendant who is able to appreciate<br />

all of the circumstances of the particular case. It is best in professional liability cases to retain an<br />

expert with practical experience comparable to that of the defendant. In other cases, however,<br />

where an expert may be required to tender evidence as to economic or sociological trends, a<br />

highly academic background which an established record of peer reviewed research may be<br />

preferable. It is always prudent to consider the source of the expertise and its practical<br />

relevance to the issues at hand.<br />

It is advisable to retain an expert with some previous experience in a courtroom setting.<br />

<strong>The</strong> expert will then know what to expect of examination-in-chief and cross-examination and will<br />

20 “Effective Use of Expert Evidence”, <strong>The</strong> Advocate’s <strong>Society</strong> London 1996 Courthouse Series, February 1, 1996,<br />

pp. 25-7.<br />

21 Otoway B. Denny Jr. “How to Select an en Expert Witness”, Expert Testimony and the Defence of <strong>Litigation</strong>,<br />

Donald J, Hirsch Ed., (Chicago: <strong>The</strong> Defence Research Institute Inc., 1990).<br />

© 2012 <strong>The</strong> Advocates’ <strong>Society</strong>. <strong>The</strong>se materials may not be reproduced, published, distributed<br />

or posted on-line without the written permission of <strong>The</strong> <strong>Advocates'</strong> <strong>Society</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!