21.05.2015 Views

Forty grand turismo

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Giant test: Jaguar XE vs rivals<br />

The Jag’s dowdy dark blue is less fattering but brighter light<br />

and brighter hues reveal handsome, if perhaps disappointingly<br />

conservative lines that success in China and North America<br />

demands. There’s real drama at the front, but it’s strangely reminiscent<br />

of Volvo’s old S40 from other angles,<br />

and what is it with Jag’s wheel designs? The<br />

base XE seems to be wearing a set of 1970s<br />

Appliance Turbo Vec alloys normally found<br />

on porthole-festooned custom vans, and the<br />

R-Sport test car’s looked like a set of ancient<br />

GKNs you might have picked up from a Ripspeed<br />

catalogue around the same period.<br />

Luckily, other wheel designs are available.<br />

For all those misgivings, the XE would<br />

have out-posed a 3-series, had we brought<br />

one, and stands up well in the face of the<br />

slinkier 420d, the only car here optioned up<br />

with arch-flling 19-inch wheels that work<br />

the hardest despite their bigger footprint.<br />

BMW’s 20d engines have been showing reps<br />

how to have fun for 15 years and, thanks to<br />

continued evolution, still deliver the goods.<br />

Stomp the right pedal and the 420d pulls<br />

strongest, its 187bhp outpunching the Jag<br />

by 9bhp and the Benz by 19 (the pricier C250<br />

CDI parries with 201bhp) to power through<br />

to 62mph in just 7.3sec. The Merc makes<br />

the same 295lb ft as its Munich rival, the<br />

XE 317lb ft, but the Jag fails to capitalise on<br />

its 22lb ft advantage, needing half a second<br />

longer to hit the benchmark, while the Merc<br />

shrugs of its power defcit to get within a<br />

tenth of the BMW, at 7.4sec. Swap Spanish<br />

mountains for German dual carriageways<br />

and the Jag would be all done by 140mph<br />

(a sop to the insurance industry, we’re told), while the Merc’s<br />

144mph would trump its rival by a mere 2mph.<br />

Given that these are sports saloons, none of them feels truly<br />

rapid, and neither are any of their engines remotely characterful.<br />

You’ll need petrol power, or the BMW’s optional six-cylinder<br />

diesel, for that. But they’re grunty enough to keep you interested,<br />

and possess sufcient ratios in their transmissions<br />

(seven gears in the Merc, eight in the others) to keep them in<br />

the 2000-4500rpm zone where the turbos like to play. Powering<br />

up the smoothly surfaced ribbon of bitumen behind LaGuardia<br />

reveals a bit of a gap between second and third in the Jag, but in<br />

a straight run through the gears from there on, the revs barely<br />

seem to fall before the needle is picked up again for another<br />

trip to the redline. Decide to play those tunes yourself and your<br />

fngers will delight with the cool touch of real metal shift paddles,<br />

something even the F-type was denied on cost grounds at<br />

launch. They don’t come cheap, though, at £375.<br />

Sweet chassis and<br />

supple ride mean<br />

every road is a<br />

good one in the Jag<br />

110 CARMAGAZINE.CO.UK | June 2015<br />

BMW threw all its eforts into<br />

the ‘sport’ bit and forgot<br />

to tick the refinement box.<br />

Jaguar didn’t forget<br />

The BMW also uses the ZF 8HP ’box, but seems to deliver a<br />

bigger thunk to the back when each ratio comes on line. It’s the<br />

only car here to ofer anything resembling a normal automatic<br />

gearshifter: the XE gets Jag’s now-familiar rotary controller,<br />

and the Mercedes a column-shifter that frees up useful storage<br />

space on the console (unless you go for the more conventionally<br />

presented six-speed manual).<br />

A column shift doesn’t sound or look like sports saloon material,<br />

but that’s just one example of how Mercedes has confdently<br />

asserted its own agenda, after previously slavishly following<br />

BMW’s. Body motions are well controlled and the fast 2.1-turns<br />

variable-ratio steering rack imbues the C-class with a surprising<br />

pointiness, but never at the expense of sophistication or stability.<br />

This can do the twisty stuf with ease, but it’s not massively engaging.<br />

Task it with a high speed A-road run though, and that’s<br />

where it shows its mettle.<br />

The 420d is diferent. Rawer, more feelsome, less comfortable,<br />

it doesn’t deal with surface imperfections anything like as well,<br />

but keys you into that surface better. There’s less understeer in<br />

the fat-tyred BMW and more opportunity to experience the traditional<br />

sensations of a rear-drive chassis. No-one really turns<br />

the ESP of in these cars, much like no-one drives their new<br />

Lambo at 202mph, the diference between C220 and 420 being<br />

that you actually can in the BMW, and you might want to.<br />

The Jag complies too; at least to demands to deactivate the<br />

ESP, though the grip/grunt ratio is skewed in favour of the rubber<br />

so if you want to make tyre fres you’ll need the 335bhp XE<br />

S – or the XE R if you’ve got the patience to wait a year or two. But<br />

what even this humble diesel does show is that there’s more to4<br />

C-class’s strangely cab<br />

backward stance not its<br />

finest hour, but you won’t<br />

care from inside that cab

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!