23.05.2015 Views

Communiqué

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IN THE NEWS<br />

Event Snapshots<br />

Challenges to Democracy: The Future of Policing<br />

February 5, 2015<br />

In February, the Ash Center cosponsored a JFK Jr. Forum event on “Challenges to<br />

Democracy: The Future of Policing,” which explored how recent episodes of police<br />

violence and subsequent demonstrations have laid bare the corrosive distrust that<br />

defines relations between citizens and police in many communities across the<br />

country. The speakers included Commissioner Charles H. Ramsey of the Philadelphia<br />

Police Department; Atiba Goff, who is an associate professor of Social Psychology<br />

at UCLA and a visiting scholar of the Malcolm Weiner Center for Social<br />

Policy this year; and Houston Mayor Annise Parker. HKS Dean David Ellwood moderated<br />

the discussion, which focused on how citizens’ perceptions of police and<br />

the criminal justice system are often shaped by race, and how communities can<br />

work to develop more effective and democratic law enforcement agencies.<br />

The speakers outlined several solutions to improve community-police relations,<br />

including: increasing training programs for officers in the areas of race, poverty,<br />

substance abuse, and mental health; educating the public on the roles and responsibilities<br />

of police officers; and encouraging community involvement in shaping<br />

local police forces. While the speakers acknowledged that reforms are necessary<br />

within law enforcement agencies across the country, they stressed that recent<br />

events in Ferguson and New York City are part of a larger system of inequality, including<br />

racial disparities in education funding and a punitive criminal justice system<br />

that makes it very difficult for ex-offenders to participate fully in society.<br />

50 Years after the Voting Rights Act: Strategies for Moving<br />

Forward<br />

February 18, 2015<br />

To mark the 50th anniversary of the passage of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) of<br />

1965, the Ash Center and the Harvard Institute of Politics convened a panel discussion<br />

in the JFK Jr. Forum in February. Alex Keyssar, the Matthew W. Stirling<br />

Jr. Professor of History and Social Policy and an Ash Center affiliate, moderated<br />

the conversation with Congressman Robert C. "Bobby" Scott (D-VA), a senior<br />

House Democrat active on civil rights issues who was the first African-American<br />

elected to Congress from Virginia since Reconstruction. Joining Professor<br />

Keyssar and Congressman Scott was Penda Hair, a civil-rights advocate and cofounder<br />

and co-director of the Advancement Project, a racial justice organization<br />

spearheading litigation that challenges voter restrictions, discriminatory electoral<br />

provisions, and other civil rights violations across the nation.<br />

The panelists discussed strategies for responding to the wave of legislation<br />

at the state level seeking to impose additional burdens on voting, spurred on by<br />

the US Supreme Court's 2013 decision in Shelby v. Holder that struck down a<br />

key section of the VRA. During the discussion, Hair recounted her legal work<br />

fighting against a variety of restrictive voting provisions in court. Congressman<br />

Scott described his surprise to opposition to rewriting the VRA to conform with<br />

the Shelby case, “We didn’t expect this kind of resistance to such a minor voting<br />

rights bill.” A strong supporter of the VRA’s requirement that certain jurisdictions<br />

receive federal approval known as “preclearance” prior to implementing changes<br />

to local voting laws, Congressman Scott said the provision worked as intended<br />

because prior to its enactment, states were “essentially rewarded for cheating”<br />

by discriminating against African-American voters. Those states, he said, “earned<br />

preclearance” through the poll taxes, literacy taxes, and voter intimidation.<br />

Project on Municipal Innovation Advisory Group<br />

March 26–28, 2015<br />

The Project on Municipal Innovation Advisory Group (PMI-AG) met for the 13th<br />

time at Harvard Kennedy School in March. PMI-AG is comprised of chiefs of staff,<br />

deputy mayors, and policy directors from the country’s 35 largest and most creative<br />

cities. Funded through Living Cities, the goal of this network is to enhance<br />

Dean David Ellwood, Houston Mayor Annise Parker, Philadelphia<br />

Police Commissioner Charles Ramsey, and UCLA Professor Phillip Goff<br />

discuss The Future of Policing<br />

HKS Professor Alex Keyssar, Penda Hair of the Advancement Project,<br />

and Congressman Robert "Bobby" Scott (D-VA) assess the Voting<br />

Rights Act on its 50th anniversary<br />

Stephen Goldsmith, director of the Innovations in Government<br />

program, makes remarks at the March meeting of the Project on<br />

Municipal Innovation Advisory Group<br />

the quality of urban life by connecting city hall leaders to innovative ideas and<br />

then supporting the replication and implementation of those ideas. In partnership<br />

with Living Cities, the Ash Center convenes two PMI-AG member in-person<br />

meetings per year. The theme of the March meeting was Civic and Community<br />

Engagement in Government Decision Making, from a City Hall Perspective. The<br />

PMI-AG members discussed civic and community engagement in relation to Collective<br />

Impact, an approach that represents the commitment of a group of actors<br />

from different sectors to a common agenda for solving a complex social problem;<br />

the policing crisis; and open data, performance management, and application<br />

development.<br />

www.ash.harvard.edu<br />

Spring 2015 <strong>Communiqué</strong><br />

17

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!