26.05.2015 Views

American Handgunner July/August 1982

American Handgunner July/August 1982

American Handgunner July/August 1982

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

pull, though, was excellent-an ounce over<br />

three pounds, with the barest perceptible<br />

trigger movement after sear release.<br />

In the interest of fairness, it must be<br />

stated that no new gun will ever be as<br />

smooth as one that has been cycled a few<br />

thousand times. A characteristic of S&W<br />

actions is that they get smoother with use,<br />

and mine are well used. Most certainly,<br />

they're more civilized now than when they<br />

were new.<br />

Since the L frame is visibly smaller than<br />

the N, I was surprised at how heavy it felt.<br />

A consultation with Mr. Fairbanks-MoJ:se<br />

quickly revealed that, at 46 ounces, the 6­<br />

inch L is 2 ounces heavier than my 5-inch<br />

N model, and weighs 9 ounces more than<br />

ger is smooth and wider than the regular<br />

S&W trigger, but not as wide as the extra<br />

cost target or combat models. It is also<br />

thick and chunky looking, as if they took a<br />

wide trigger blank and just tapped it with<br />

the forging hammer so it didn't get mashed<br />

as much as it should have been. The trigger<br />

works fine, it just doesn't have the classic<br />

S&W look.<br />

The hammer's unusual appearance<br />

stems·from the fact that the cocking spur is<br />

placed low. This makes the nose proportionately<br />

longer than on K or N. But the<br />

low spur is there for a reason. L's grip<br />

frame is exactly the same as K's. This exactness<br />

is carried to the location of the<br />

hammer spur and even the thumb latch,<br />

ing. This gives a due as to what the Smith<br />

& Wesson folks had in mind for the new<br />

frame size. More on this subject later.<br />

The final departure from previous practice<br />

was noted in the serial numbering system.<br />

The test gun's number is AAB0024. A<br />

call to S& W gave me the key to the new<br />

procedure. The first L frame gun produced<br />

was No. AAAOOOI. Gun No. 10,000 was<br />

AABOOOO. Thus, the test gun was the<br />

1O,024th L frame gun built.<br />

While taking the gun apart for detailed<br />

comparison photos, I gently touched a few<br />

spots on the L's action parts with a hard<br />

Arkansas stone to hurry the aging process.<br />

After the photo session, when the L was reassembled,<br />

its DA mechanism was better.<br />

-<br />

These S&W cylinders fit, from left to right, Models K, L, N.<br />

Triggers I hands: ~ (longest), L, K (shortest).<br />

Hammers, Models N,L,K (left to right), are slightly diHerent.<br />

L barrel' has nearly tVl(ice metal thickness' at throat.<br />

AMERICAN HANDGUNNER· JULY IAUGUST <strong>1982</strong><br />

the 4-inch 19, which tips the scales at a<br />

mere 37. The extra weight, of course, is in<br />

'the barrel, which gives the gun a distinct<br />

muzzle-heavy balance.<br />

Except for the full barrel length underlug,<br />

the L looks almost like any other<br />

Smith & Wesson, but there are differences.<br />

Though the cylinder is larger in diameter<br />

than K's, it is shorter, because case heads<br />

are not recessed. This reduces weight and<br />

cost, but the wide gap between cylinder<br />

and breech face is a departure from normal<br />

S&W practice.<br />

The L's hammer and trigger, too, look<br />

"different." The trigger is a new one, first<br />

offered on L guns but usable on any K or<br />

N frame. In fact, it may become the standard<br />

trigger on K and larger guns. The<br />

other day I saw a Model 13 that came from<br />

the factory with this trigger. The new trigwhich<br />

is also set slightly lower than the<br />

usual position. These deviations from the"<br />

norm were made for the express purpose<br />

ofduplicating the feel of the K frame grip.<br />

Many folks believe that the K grip is ideally<br />

sized for most people, that larger or<br />

smaller won't do.<br />

The L's frame is a little taller than K's,<br />

but the same length. The window, or cylinder<br />

opening, is necessarily larger, to accommodate<br />

the greater diameter cylinder.<br />

""At the front, the L frame is wider than the<br />

K, to handle the thicker barrel.<br />

For the first time that I can recall, the instruction<br />

sheet with an S&W revolver<br />

includes sighting information. Instructions<br />

for Models 586 and 686, carbon and stainless<br />

steel versions of Distinguished Combat<br />

Magnum revolvers, list sight settings<br />

for Practical Police Pistol Combat shoot-<br />

The first tIme at the range the 586 didn't<br />

give a "Distinguished" performance. Fired<br />

single action from the bench while sighting<br />

in, it performed okay. But the DA mechanism<br />

was still a little stiff for good rapid fire<br />

work. The extra ounces out at the end of<br />

the barrel didn't seem to help or hinder in<br />

any manner. I decided that the action<br />

would have to be smoothed some more before<br />

the gun could reach its full potential.<br />

Another couple hours of shop time and<br />

the L began to blossom. McGivern always<br />

preferred the N frame for his "Fast and<br />

Fancy" double action shooting exhibitions,<br />

because the big gun would run faster<br />

than the K. The L has the same fast-flicking<br />

roll; the cylinder seems to develop a<br />

momentum ofits own that adds power and<br />

rhythm to the shooter's efforts.<br />

. Continued on page 73<br />

3S

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!