31.05.2015 Views

Spring 2011 - TriStar Health

Spring 2011 - TriStar Health

Spring 2011 - TriStar Health

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Spring</strong> <strong>2011</strong><br />

Volume 2, Number 2<br />

INSIDE THIS ISSUE<br />

01 Summit Medical Center:<br />

Improving Heart Attack Care<br />

<strong>TriStar</strong> Heart Journal Editorial Staff<br />

01 Therapeutic Hypothermia<br />

Following Sudden Cardiac Arrest<br />

Jeffrey C. Webber, MD<br />

02 From the Editor: The Engaged<br />

<strong>Health</strong>care Provider<br />

Steven V. Manoukian, MD<br />

03 Heart Watch<br />

<strong>TriStar</strong> Heart Journal Editorial Staff<br />

05 Aquapheresis: Surpassing<br />

Watered Down Heart Failure Care<br />

Himanshu M. Patel, MD<br />

06 View From Afar: Timely Surgery<br />

Improves Outcomes in Mitral<br />

Regurgitation<br />

Vinay Badhwar, MD<br />

09 SCRI CV Research Update: Who’s<br />

the BOSS?<br />

Steven V. Manoukian, MD<br />

10 Fixing Holes in the Heart<br />

John A. Riddick, MD<br />

11 The Final Word: Prevention via<br />

Risk Factor Modification<br />

Timothy K. Kreth, MD<br />

12 <strong>TriStar</strong> News<br />

Summit Medical Center:<br />

Improving Heart Attack Care<br />

<strong>TriStar</strong> Heart Journal Editorial Staff<br />

Serving residents within and beyond Wilson County, Summit Medical Center, a 188-bed facility<br />

in Hermitage, Tenn., is continually enhancing its services and infrastructure to meet the<br />

needs of the community. Wilson County, one of the fastest growing counties in the U.S., is located<br />

immediately east of Nashville’s Davidson County and includes Mount Juliet, the fastest<br />

growing city in Tennessee and 27th fastest growing city in the U.S.<br />

“Given the continued growth in our immediate communities, it’s imperative that we provide<br />

the appropriate healthcare services, particularly for emergent cases like acute myocardial<br />

infarction,” says Jeff Whitehorn, CEO of Summit.<br />

Continued on page 04<br />

Therapeutic Hypothermia Following Sudden<br />

Cardiac Arrest<br />

Jeffrey C. Webber, MD, Centennial Medical Center jeffrey_webber_1999@yahoo.com<br />

Jeffrey C. Webber, MD<br />

Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is a formidable problem, as American Heart Association (AHA) data suggest that approximately<br />

236,000 to 325,000 out-of-hospital arrests occur annually in the U.S. 1 More sobering is the relatively static<br />

and abysmal overall survival rate of 6-7%. While survival depends upon the type of arrhythmia responsible and<br />

time of onset to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), an integral feature of survival is the ability to limit central<br />

neurologic damage. To combat this deadly side effect of SCA, mild hypothermia is becoming more accepted as appropriate<br />

therapy.<br />

Continued on page 08<br />

<strong>Spring</strong> <strong>2011</strong> 01


From the Editor<br />

The Engaged <strong>Health</strong>care Provider<br />

en·gaged adj. \in-’gãjd, en-\ greatly interested; committed<br />

Steven V. Manoukian, MD, Medical Director of Cardiovascular Services, Hospital Corporation of America<br />

steven.manoukian@hcahealthcare.com<br />

Editor-in-Chief<br />

Steven V. Manoukian, MD,<br />

Hospital Corporation of<br />

America<br />

EDITORIAL BOARD<br />

Cardiac Imaging<br />

David C. Huneycutt, Jr., MD<br />

Centennial Medical Center<br />

Nashville, Tenn.<br />

david.huneycutt@<br />

hcahealthcare.com<br />

Cardiothoracic Surgery<br />

Davis C. Drinkwater, Jr., MD<br />

Centennial Medical Center<br />

Nashville, Tenn.<br />

davis@ddrinkwater.com<br />

Electrophysiology<br />

Gregory G. Bashian, MD<br />

Centennial Medical Center<br />

Nashville, Tenn.<br />

gregory.bashian@<br />

hcahealthcare.com<br />

General Cardiology<br />

David E. Chambers, MD<br />

Horizon Medical Center<br />

Dickson, Tenn.<br />

dchambers@dicksonmd.com<br />

CONTACT US<br />

<strong>TriStar</strong> Heart Journal<br />

Editorial Staff<br />

110 Winners Circle<br />

Brentwood, TN 37027<br />

thj@hcahealthcare.com<br />

cardiac.tristarhealth.com<br />

(800) 242-5662<br />

The Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary defines engaged as “greatly interested” or “committed.”<br />

Traditionally, healthcare providers have shown engagement by providing high-quality direct patient<br />

care, in order to prolong and improve the quality of their patients’ lives.<br />

In today’s healthcare, being an engaged provider extends beyond direct patient care. Providers<br />

and their facilities are not only becoming more engaged with one another, but also more<br />

aligned and accountable to further enhance the quality, cost-effectiveness and efficiency of<br />

care. Eventually, new healthcare delivery systems, defined by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid<br />

Services as accountable care organizations (ACOs), may shape the new manner in which<br />

healthcare is delivered. ACOs will link provider reimbursements to metrics assessing both quality<br />

and cost. By definition, ACOs will need to be accountable for the care they provide to succeed<br />

in the era of healthcare reform. Consequently, providers, healthcare administrators, third-party<br />

payers, governmental bodies, industry and essentially all facets of U.S. healthcare will need to<br />

become more engaged and aligned.<br />

For providers, being engaged will require effort and possibly a change in mindset, since gaining<br />

an understanding of future healthcare barriers, championing quality improvement programs, as<br />

well as reducing unnecessary costs and clinical variation are new, challenging concepts.<br />

However, providing top-notch direct patient care will always be important for caregivers and<br />

administrators and will continue to require an extensive, up-to-date fund of knowledge. To this<br />

end, <strong>TriStar</strong> Heart Journal (THJ) strives to be a valuable engagement tool, providing information<br />

about new provider and facility strategies to enhance accountable care. Your engagement with<br />

THJ has enabled the journal to grow to 12 pages, allowing for expanded content and new features.<br />

Among the new features, Heart Watch will concisely highlight results from major scientific<br />

meetings and recent journal publications. View From Afar will feature a national or international<br />

expert from beyond <strong>TriStar</strong>. In this issue, Vinay Badhwar, a renowned cardiothoracic surgeon<br />

from Osceola Regional Medical Center in Kissimmee, Fla., shares his expertise regarding the<br />

timing and techniques to optimize surgical outcomes in mitral valvular disease.<br />

Also in this issue is expert information from Jeffrey Webber from Centennial on therapeutic<br />

hypothermia, who underscores that the neurologic impact of sudden cardiac arrest often rivals<br />

or exceeds the cardiovascular manifestations. Next, Summit Medical Center describes its new,<br />

comprehensive, 24/7 primary PCI program for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction,<br />

in addition to its expansion of the emergency department. Aquapheresis, a valuable tool to improve<br />

outcomes, decrease complications and perhaps reduce costs and prevent readmissions<br />

in acute heart failure, is presented by Himanshu Patel, and includes his personal experience with<br />

this new technology at Redmond Regional. Centennial’s experienced structural heart disease interventionalist,<br />

John Riddick gives a primer on when percutaneous ASD/PFO repair should be<br />

considered. In The Final Word, Summit’s Timothy Kreth shares his approach to the important<br />

topic of risk factor modification, especially in the primary prevention setting. Lastly, in the SCRI<br />

CV Research Update, the BOSS Trial, which is exploring the use of sodium bicarbonate to reduce<br />

contrast-induced nephropathy, is reviewed, as well as other important trials being performed in<br />

SCRI’s growing six-site cardiovascular strategic network.<br />

THJ appreciates your readership and is committed to enhancing your ability to engage in accountable,<br />

high-quality care. <br />

For author inquiries, contact steven.manoukian@hcahealthcare.com<br />

02 <strong>TriStar</strong> Heart Journal


Heart Watch<br />

Atrial fibrillation mapping tool shows benefit<br />

The use of a diagnostic mapping tool helped terminate or<br />

slow atrial fibrillation (AF) with less than 10 minutes of ablation,<br />

according to the late-breaking CONFIRM trial presented<br />

May 5 at the 32nd annual Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) scientific<br />

sessions. Researchers found that focal impulse and rotor<br />

modulation (FIRM) ablation increased two-year freedom<br />

of AF by 70%.<br />

The study enrolled 103 patients; 67% of whom had persistent<br />

AF and 33% had paroxysmal AF. The researchers split patients<br />

into two groups to receive either FIRM-guided ablation<br />

for less than 10 minutes per rotor focus followed by a wide-area<br />

circumferential ablation (WACA) for pulmonary vein isolation<br />

(32 patients) or WACA alone (71 patients).<br />

According to the authors, acute AF termination or slowing<br />

occurred in 88% of patients in the FIRM-guided arm compared<br />

with 14% in the conventional arm. Additionally, the two-year<br />

data showed that 84.3% of patients in the FIRM-guided arm<br />

were free of AF compared with 50.5% in the conventional arm.<br />

In the majority of patient cases sinus rhythm was achieved<br />

in 10 to 15 minutes. The researchers also reported that FIRMalone<br />

terminated AF to sinus rhythm in six minutes (17 patients)<br />

and lengthened AF cycle length by more than 15%. Single<br />

procedure freedom from AF at one year was 25% higher<br />

for FIRM-WACA compared with WACA alone.<br />

Subcutaneous ICDs prove effective<br />

A subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD)<br />

system was 100% effective in converting and detecting induced<br />

ventricular fibrillation (VF) through shock, according to<br />

a study presented May 4 at HRS. Therefore, the researchers<br />

concluded that the S-ICD system can therefore be comparable<br />

to conventional ICD therapy.<br />

Ninety-eight patients were implanted with S-ICDs in three<br />

sites in the Netherlands. The devices were implanted according<br />

to international guidelines and were tested using 65<br />

shocks. After a nine-month follow-up, the researchers reported<br />

that there were no hospitalizations due to heart failure and<br />

no patients experienced episodes of sudden cardiac death.<br />

Additionally, the systems acutely detected and converted episodes<br />

of induced VF 100% of the time.<br />

The researchers also reported that 34 sustained or non-sustained<br />

spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias were detected in six<br />

patients and 23 arrhythmic episodes were treated in three patients.<br />

RIVAL confounds the transradial PCI debate<br />

Radial access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in<br />

patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) does not reduce<br />

a combined endpoint of death, heart attack, stroke or major<br />

bleeding compared with femoral access, according to the<br />

late-breaking RIVAL trial presented April 4 at the 60th annual<br />

American College of Cardiology (ACC) scientific sessions.<br />

Access Site Major Bleeds<br />

6* Allocated to Radial HR 0.50 (95% CI 0.19-1.33)<br />

12<br />

Between June 2006 and November 2010, RIVAL enrolled<br />

7,021 patients from 158 hospitals in 32 countries and randomly<br />

assigned them to radial (3,507 patients) or femoral access<br />

(3,514). The primary outcome was death, MI, stroke or non-<br />

CABG-related major bleeding at 30 days, which occurred in<br />

3.7% in the radial access group compared with 4% in the femoral<br />

access group. The rate of death, MI or stroke at 30 days<br />

was 3.2% in the radial group compared with 3.2% in the femoral<br />

group.<br />

Allocated to Femoral<br />

*All access site major bleeds actually occurred at femoral<br />

arterial site (in radial group due to cross-over or IABP).<br />

Source: RIVAL investigators, ACC11 Presentation.<br />

Radial arteries best saphenous vein grafts for<br />

CABG at 5 years<br />

For coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, radial arteries<br />

are associated with reduced rates of functional and complete<br />

graft occlusion, as well as less graft disease, than saphenous<br />

veins, according to the five-year results of the RAPS<br />

late-breaking clinical trial, presented April 4 at ACC.<br />

The study enrolled 561 patients who underwent CABG for<br />

three-vessel disease. Each patient received both a radial artery<br />

graft and a saphenous vein graft at two different diseased<br />

vessel sites. The primary endpoint of functional graft occlusion<br />

was determined through invasive angiography at least<br />

five years after surgery. The secondary endpoint was complete<br />

graft occlusion determined through invasive angiography<br />

or computed tomography angiography.<br />

The researchers conducted late angiography on 440 patients<br />

alive at one year and on 269 patients at a mean of 7.6<br />

years post-procedure. In the latter follow-up, they found that<br />

significantly fewer radial arteries became partially occluded<br />

than saphenous vein grafts, at 12% and 18.8%, respectively.<br />

Significantly fewer radial arteries also became completely<br />

occluded, at 8.9%, than saphenous veins, at 17.8%. <br />

<strong>Spring</strong> <strong>2011</strong> 03


Summit Medical Center: Improving Heart Attack Care<br />

Continued from page 01<br />

“Because Tennessee has very high, statewide rates of heart<br />

disease, fueled by a tradition of unhealthy lifestyle habits,<br />

proper services are needed to serve this population,” Whitehorn<br />

adds.<br />

In fact, more than one out of four deaths in Tennessee is<br />

due to heart disease, according to the 2009 Centers for Disease<br />

Control and Prevention report. And heart disease is the<br />

leading cause of death for both women and men in the state.<br />

To address these needs, Summit has renewed offering primary<br />

percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) services for<br />

patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), 24<br />

hours a day, seven days a week (24/7). In order to provide<br />

these services on a continuous basis, Summit hired two new<br />

interventional cardiologists, for a total of four, allowing the<br />

provider to begin offering 24/7 STEMI care in January <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

While the hospital performed six PCI procedures in January,<br />

the PCI volume more than doubled in February to 14 procedures.<br />

“When we previously offered 24/7 STEMI care, Summit<br />

averaged 24 PCI procedures per month. In addition, in 2006,<br />

we performed between 60 to 90 diagnostic catheterizations<br />

monthly,” explains Holly Hill, RN, MSN, director of cardiac<br />

services at Summit. “We hope to achieve those levels of volume<br />

again with the renewal of this program.”<br />

“We are excited to offer 24/7 PCI at Summit Medical Center,”<br />

says Randy Farrar, RN, BSN, CEN, director of emergency and critical<br />

care services at Summit. “Time is muscle; every minute saved<br />

improves the chances of a better outcome for our patients.”<br />

The American College of Cardiology recommends a doorto-balloon<br />

time for primary PCI for STEMI of less than 90<br />

minutes. The average door-to-balloon time at Summit is 64<br />

minutes for STEMI and patients who require surgery are<br />

transferred to Centennial Medical Center, which is 15 miles<br />

away. During the fourth quarter of 2010, Summit’s door-toballoon<br />

time averaged 56 minutes.<br />

In an effort to shave off a few more minutes of their doorto-balloon<br />

times, Summit evaluates each case to identify opportunities<br />

for improvement. Methods put in place include:<br />

activation of cath lab from the field via EMS, immediate triage<br />

of chest pain patients and cross-training<br />

of emergency department staff in the catheterization<br />

lab.<br />

Communication between the various provider<br />

services and having the technologies to<br />

make information accessible to the appropriate<br />

caregivers is “extremely important, as this<br />

will only serve to improve patient outcomes,”<br />

Whitehorn says.<br />

The emergency department has served approximately<br />

48,000 patients over the past two<br />

years. Summit is currently undergoing a $7<br />

million expansion that will increase the number<br />

of beds in the emergency department to<br />

32, compared with its current number of 23<br />

beds. The expansion is expected to be completed<br />

by Aug. 1.<br />

“One of the reasons for the renovation is to<br />

meet the demands of the growing population,” says Farrar.<br />

“This expansion has been implemented to better serve the<br />

needs of our community. It will not only add rooms but will reduce<br />

wait times as well.”<br />

Within the emergency department expansion, Summit also<br />

has dedicated a certain number of beds to an emergency department<br />

fast track, which “allows us to see and treat those<br />

patients who are more acutely ill in a faster, more efficient<br />

manner,” Whitehorn explains. “These dedicated rooms will<br />

improve the patient experience for all those who enter the<br />

emergency department, as the workflow will be streamlined<br />

based on the needs of the patient on arrival.”<br />

Farrar believes this fast track process will result in an increase<br />

in patient satisfaction, as this will lead to a decrease<br />

in emergency department wait times for emergent and nonemergent<br />

cases.<br />

“Currently in healthcare, quality is measured and publicly<br />

reported more frequently than ever, making our patients more<br />

informed consumers,” Whitehorn says. “While that type of<br />

transparency may be a hard adjustment for providers, it is our<br />

responsibility to produce excellent patient outcomes across<br />

the various specialties, including cardiology services.” <br />

04 <strong>TriStar</strong> Heart Journal


Aquapheresis:<br />

Surpassing Watered Down Heart Failure Care<br />

Himanshu M. Patel, MD, Redmond Regional Medical Center hpatel@harbinclinic.com<br />

Due to the prolongation of life resulting<br />

from the advances in cardiovascular<br />

therapeutic innovations<br />

and the aging population, the prevalence<br />

of congestive heart failure<br />

(CHF) is increasing. Treatment strategies<br />

for CHF vary widely, resulting<br />

in mortality which remains exceedingly<br />

high. The American Heart Association<br />

estimated there were 5.8<br />

Himanshu M. Patel, MD million people with CHF in the U.S.<br />

in 2006. Furthermore, average survival<br />

after a patient’s first hospitalization for CHF is alarmingly<br />

low: 1.7 years for women and 2.3 years for men. Heart failure is<br />

also one of the most common causes of hospitalization and readmission.<br />

In 2006, the U.S. heart failure hospitalization rate was<br />

23 per 1,000 for men over the age of 64 and 20 per 1,000 for women<br />

over the age of 64, making it the leading cause of hospitalization<br />

in this age group 1 . Lastly, about a quarter of those who are<br />

hospitalized with heart failure are readmitted within 30 days 2 .<br />

Despite the severity, inpatient CHF treatment has remained<br />

relatively unchanged. Cornerstones of treatment include intravenous<br />

diuretics, sodium and fluid restriction, ACE inhibitors<br />

or ARBs, beta-blockers, BP control and aldosterone blockers.<br />

Other useful tools include inotropic agents in low cardiac<br />

output states and nesiritide infusions in hypertensive states.<br />

A common complication of intravenous diuretic treatment<br />

is a fall in cardiac output induced by loop diuretic therapy,<br />

which has important implications for the time course of diuresis.<br />

In both stable individuals and those with CHF, ensuing<br />

activation of sodium-retaining mechanisms (angiotensin II,<br />

aldosterone and norepinephrine), as well as flow-dependent<br />

hypertrophy in the renal distal tubule limits the response to<br />

continued diuretic therapy and can lead to prolonged hospitalization<br />

and readmission for CHF.<br />

This complication of diuretics and others limit their efficacy,<br />

resulting in a need for new methods to remove fluid safely and<br />

efficiently. In addition, there is a need to provide inpatient treatments<br />

that have the potential to reduce re-hospitalization.<br />

At Redmond Regional Medical Center in Rome, Ga., we<br />

have initiated an alternative FDA-approved treatment to remove<br />

fluid, called aquapheresis. We have been using this<br />

method for more than 19 months with great success.<br />

Also known as ultrafiltration, the technique involves the removal<br />

of blood through a peripheral or central venous catheter. Salt<br />

and water is filtered from the blood through a console containing<br />

two pumps. Excess fluid and salt are removed and collected in a<br />

bag and blood is returned to the body in less than a minute. Patients<br />

are anticoagulated prior to and during treatment to prevent<br />

clotting within the blood filter. Approximately 33 cc of extracorporeal<br />

blood is extracted at any given time. An average of 100 cc to<br />

500 cc of fluid can be removed per hour, which can be adjusted.<br />

Electrolyte balance is easier to maintain than traditional diuresis.<br />

Treatment duration depends on the patient’s condition, but average<br />

procedure duration is 24-72 hours in the inpatient setting.<br />

Redmond Regional Medical Center<br />

Heart Failure Data<br />

Readmission Rate (within 30 days)<br />

Standard Heart Failure (HF) Treatment 20%<br />

Aquapheresis 12%<br />

Length of Hospital Stay<br />

Standard HF Treatment<br />

Aquapheresis<br />

Aquapheresis within 24 hrs<br />

The UNLOAD trial was the first study to demonstrate the<br />

safety and efficacy of aquapheresis 3 . Emergency room patients<br />

with acute, decompensated CHF were randomized to<br />

standard treatment versus aquapheresis. At 90 days, patients<br />

treated with aquapheresis had a 50% reduction in rehospitalization,<br />

63% reduction in hospitalized days and a 52% reduction<br />

in emergency room visits/clinic visits. The study concluded<br />

that in decompensated CHF, ultrafiltration via aquapheresis<br />

safely produces greater weight and fluid loss than intravenous<br />

diuretics, reduces 90-day resource utilization for heart<br />

failure and is an effective alternative therapy.<br />

Utilizing this technique, Redmond has halved its 30-day readmission<br />

rates at the hospital, compared with standard treatment<br />

patients. Also, the length of hospital stay is almost 1-2 days less<br />

compared with conventionally treated CHF patients. <br />

REFERENCES:<br />

6.2 Days<br />

5.2 Days<br />

3.9 Days<br />

Source: Unpublished<br />

1. Liu L. Changes in Cardiovascular Hospitalization and Co-morbidity of HF in the U.S.:<br />

Findings from the National Hospital Discharge Surveys 1980-2006. Int J Cardiol<br />

<strong>2011</strong>;149(1):39-45.<br />

2. Jencks SF, Williams MV, and Coleman EA. Rehospitalizations among patients in the<br />

Medicare fee-for-service program. N Engl J Med 2009;360(14):1418-1428.<br />

3. Costanzo MR, Guglin ME, Saltzberg MT, et al. Ultrafiltration Versus Intravenous<br />

Diuretics for Patients Hospitalized for Acute Decompensated HF. J Am Coll Cardiol<br />

2007;49:675-683.<br />

<strong>Spring</strong> <strong>2011</strong> 05


View from Afar<br />

Timely Surgery<br />

Improves Outcomes in Mitral Regurgitation<br />

Vinay Badhwar, MD, Osceola Regional Medical Center, Kissimmee, Fla. vbadhwar@heartsurgery-csa.com<br />

Vinay Badhwar, MD<br />

Many patients with heart failure<br />

also have structural heart disease,<br />

which can be coronary or valvular—the<br />

latter of which is commonly<br />

mitral-based. Mitral regurgitation<br />

(MR) is increasingly prevalent in the<br />

aging population, and may lead to<br />

substantial all-cause morbidity and<br />

mortality, particularly in those with<br />

heart failure. Timely surgical referral<br />

of these patients is truly important<br />

for improved clinical outcomes.<br />

The problem of MR can be divided into two broad etiologies:<br />

primary leaflet-based pathology or ventricular-based pathology.<br />

Leaflet pathologies consist of myxomatous degeneration<br />

(or mitral valve prolapse with a problem of excess<br />

This is the first installment in<br />

our “View from Afar” series, in<br />

which we will be inviting expert<br />

physicians from beyond the<br />

<strong>TriStar</strong> <strong>Health</strong> System to write on<br />

a variety of cardiovascular topics.<br />

leaflet), or fibroelastic deficiency<br />

(or thin leaflets with flailed isolated<br />

segment), the latter of which<br />

is more common in the elderly.<br />

Ventricular pathologies of dilated<br />

or ischemic heart failure result<br />

in functional MR caused by leaflet<br />

tethering associated with ventricular dilation. Particularly for<br />

this second subset, it is integral to intervene before the disease<br />

has progressed too far, because even if the valve is fixed,<br />

the ventricle still has the potential to fail.<br />

When to intervene?<br />

In triaging when a patient should be referred for an intervention<br />

of the mitral valve, the recently updated ACC/AHA guidelines<br />

point to specific symptoms related to dyspnea, such as<br />

recurring congestive heart failure, NYHA Class of ≥3 or orthopnea<br />

1 . Also, if a patient is asymptomatic, and develops atrial fibrillation,<br />

it may be a marker of late progression of MR. Often,<br />

these patients can be treated with concomitant atrial fibrillation<br />

procedures at the time of mitral valve repair. There is increasing<br />

evidence, based upon echocardiographic studies, that pulmonary<br />

hypertension may also be a marker of late progression<br />

of MR 2 . These patients should be referred for surgery earlier.<br />

For those who are symptomatic and have severe MR, the<br />

patient should be referred immediately. In fact, the natural<br />

history of severe MR notes a seven-year survival benefit in<br />

patients who are asymptomatic, and a five-year survival benefit<br />

for those who are symptomatic. This is not a benign disease.<br />

Patients with severe symptomatic MR, who are treated<br />

with medical therapy fair quite poorly, not only in terms of<br />

quality of life due to recurrent heart failure but also due to limited<br />

short-term survival.<br />

When to refer?<br />

However, it is less clear for physicians when to refer asymptomatic<br />

patients for intervention, which is why retrospective<br />

and prospective studies have helped to inform the field. In<br />

a recent longitudinal study, early surgical intervention was<br />

compared with watchful waiting for 447 asymptomatic severe<br />

MR patients. Estimated actuarial seven-year cardiac mortality<br />

was 0% in the operated group and 5% in the conventional<br />

treatment group, and for 127 propensity score-matched pairs,<br />

the estimated actuarial seven-year event-free survival rate<br />

was significantly higher in the operated than in the conventional<br />

treatment group 3 .<br />

Many global studies have consistently shown that early<br />

intervention in severe valvular pathology not only improves<br />

long-term quality of life, but also confers a significant survival<br />

advantage. Patients who undergo mitral valve repair can resume<br />

a normal life and anticipate a normal life expectancy.<br />

Also, new longitudinal data indicate that if the valve is repaired<br />

in a timely manner, the patient can achieve normalization<br />

of ventricular function 4 . Of 1,063 patients who underwent<br />

mitral valve surgery over a 20-year period, 87% of patients underwent<br />

valve repair and 13% underwent replacement. Factors<br />

including higher preoperative ejection fraction, smaller<br />

left ventricular dimensions and performance of valve repair<br />

(versus replacement) were associated with a higher ejection<br />

fraction at follow-up. The researchers concluded that early repair<br />

of MR caused by leaflet prolapse, before deterioration in<br />

left heart size or function, increases the likelihood of subsequent<br />

normalization of left ventricular ejection fraction.<br />

In addition to symptomatic criteria, the guidelines also recommend<br />

that patients should be assessed based upon anatomic<br />

criteria, such as left ventricular end-diastolic dimension<br />

or volume and referred before the heart dilates 1 . Left ventricular<br />

end-diastolic dimension of 40 mm is the new bar which<br />

confers advantage of mitral valve repair.<br />

All of these symptomatic and anatomic factors can assist<br />

physicians with knowing how to interpret MR and when to refer<br />

patients for mitral valve surgery.<br />

In summary, if a patient is even mildly symptomatic and the<br />

patient has severe MR due to a flail mitral leaflet, he or she<br />

06 <strong>TriStar</strong> Heart Journal


Normal<br />

Infarct<br />

(Left) Balance of forces acting on mitral leaflets in systole. (Right) Effect of papillary muscle displacement. Dark shading indicates<br />

inferobasal myocardial infarction; and light shading indicates normal baseline.<br />

Source: Di Salvo, T.G, Acker, MA, Dec, GW et al. Mitral Valve Surgery in Advanced Heart Failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55:271-282.<br />

should be referred for surgical repair. If a patient is asymptomatic<br />

with severe MR, then he or she should be followed until<br />

their left ventricular end-diastolic dimension is greater than<br />

40 mm or they develop pulmonary hypertension or any other<br />

structural sign of deterioration of the heart such as atrial fibrillation<br />

or right or left atrial enlargement.<br />

However, if the patient is symptomatic, but the MR is not<br />

severe on transthoracic echocardiography, further studies are<br />

recommended such as transesophageal or stress echocardiography.<br />

In these cases, quantification methods on echocardiography<br />

are beneficial in examining the effective regurgitant<br />

orifice of the mitral valve to assess the severity of the MR.<br />

Early repair of MR can result in recovery of ventricular function<br />

and restoration of normal life expectancy. <br />

Dr. Badhwar is a renowned cardiothoracic surgeon, with<br />

specialized training and expertise in surgical valvular repair<br />

techniques. He is widely published in the medical literature,<br />

active in research and lectures. Dr. Badhwar received his medical<br />

degree in 1993 from the University of Ottawa, performed<br />

his residency at McGill University and the University of Ottawa<br />

Heart Institute and fellowship at the University of Michigan.<br />

REFERENCES:<br />

1. Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, et al. 2008 ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for<br />

the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American<br />

College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Task Force on Practice<br />

Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;48:e1-e148.<br />

2. Barbieri A, Bursi F, Grigioni F, et al. Prognostic and therapeutic implications of<br />

pulmonary hypertension complicating degenerative mitral regurgitation due to flail<br />

leaflet. Eur Heart J <strong>2011</strong>;32:751-759.<br />

3. Kang DH, Kim JH, Rim JH, et al. Comparison of early surgery versus conventional<br />

treatment in asymptomatic severe mitral regurgitation Circulation 2009;119:797-804.<br />

4. Suri RM, Schaff HV, Dearani JA, et al. Recovery of left ventricular function after<br />

surgical correction of MR caused by leaflet prolapsed. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg<br />

2009;137:1071-1076.<br />

<strong>Spring</strong> <strong>2011</strong> 07


Therapeutic Hypothermia Following Sudden Cardiac Arrest<br />

Continued from page 01<br />

Research seeking to prevent neurologic injury from SCA<br />

dates back nearly 50 years, but initiatives to pursue this therapy<br />

were initially derailed by concern over potential therapeutic<br />

side effects and lack of efficient, timely ways to achieve desired<br />

core temperature. Two landmark randomized controlled<br />

trials triggered a renewed interest in hypothermia that is now<br />

being incorporated in hospitals across the U.S.<br />

The data from these studies are compelling. First, the Australian<br />

study of 77 comatose patients following ventricular fibrillation<br />

(VF) arrest 2 assessed moderate cooling (33 °C, achieved<br />

with ice packs and intermittent sedation/paralysis for 12 hours)<br />

Mild Therapeutic Hypothermia to Improve the<br />

Neurologic Outcome After Cardiac Arrest<br />

and found that “good” clinical outcomes (discharge to home or<br />

rehabilitation unit) were significantly better with hypothermia<br />

vs. control (49% vs. 26%), as were death rates (51% vs. 68%).<br />

In the second study, 275 patients with VF or ventricular<br />

tachycardia (VT) arrest and ROSC within 60 minutes were randomized<br />

to mild hypothermia (89.6-93.2 °F utilizing cold air<br />

mattress, ice packs and sedation/paralysis as needed for 24<br />

hours) vs. standard ICU care 3 and followed up to six months.<br />

A favorable neurologic outcome was achieved in 55% of the<br />

hypothermia-treated patients vs. 39% of control patients, with<br />

mortality rates of 41% vs. 55%, respectively.<br />

These promising results propelled a discussion regarding<br />

appropriate policies for mild hypothermia therapy that culminated<br />

in recommendations from the European Resuscitation<br />

Council and the AHA in 2005. These statements recommend<br />

mild hypothermia as one of many compelling treatments for<br />

post-arrest patients presenting with VT or VF as their initial<br />

arrhythmia.<br />

Favorable<br />

Neurologic<br />

55%<br />

Outcome<br />

P=0.009 39%<br />

Death<br />

P=0.02<br />

41%<br />

55%<br />

■ Hypothermia ■ Normothermia<br />

Source: The Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest<br />

Study Group. N Engl J Med 2002;346:549-556.<br />

Practical Considerations<br />

Various methods of cooling are available. Most readily available<br />

options for inducing hypothermia include ice packs about<br />

the torso and head, infusion of chilled (4 °C) intravenous normal<br />

saline or Lactated Ringers and utilization of cooling blankets.<br />

More sophisticated therapies include intranasal evaporative<br />

cooling techniques, localized external head cooling<br />

apparatuses, specially built cooling beds, and even intravascular<br />

catheter-based cooling technology.<br />

Serious side effects of hypothermia therapy include refractory<br />

ventricular arrhythmias, electrolyte imbalances, infection<br />

and coagulopathies and are more frequent in patients<br />

with cooling “overshoot” (which may occur in 13% of patients).<br />

However, it is unclear that differences in complication<br />

rates between hypothermia-treated and control<br />

groups meaningfully alter outcomes 3 .<br />

The efficacy of hypothermia in SCA patients<br />

presenting with arrhythmias other than VT or VF<br />

remains unclear, as data from limited retrospective<br />

trials suggest a benefit of lesser magnitude.<br />

As is frequently the case, converting trial-generated<br />

data into practical day-to-day beneficial<br />

results is proving to be a monumental task. Many<br />

questions remain regarding further risk stratification,<br />

optimal time of cooling and optimal methods<br />

of achieving target temperatures.<br />

Still, healthcare professionals are increasingly<br />

embracing the concept of mild hypothermia in<br />

post-arrest patients. Indeed, there is momentum<br />

afoot to regionalize such care in an effort to decrease<br />

inter-hospital variability in outcomes across the U.S.<br />

City-wide efforts in this area are fully underway in New York, for<br />

example. There, news attention recently focused on EMS personnel<br />

now administering chilled IV fluids prepared in special<br />

refrigerator-equipped ambulances to accelerate the process of<br />

cooling in the field. In addition, the funneling of resources that<br />

would lead to directing victims of SCA to regional centers was<br />

proposed in a recent AHA policy statement 1 .<br />

Implementation of therapeutic hypothermia is fast becoming<br />

the standard of care. Policies and methodologies aimed<br />

at decreasing time to cooling will be increasingly refined. As<br />

doctors, nurses and EMS personnel become more comfortable<br />

with and facile at delivering this therapy, we will also begin<br />

to understand its limitations, as well as potentially be able<br />

to extrapolate its benefits to patients in other scenarios. <br />

REFERENCES:<br />

1. Nichol, G, Aufderheide, TP, Eigel, B, et al. Regional Systems of Care for<br />

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Policy Statement from the AHA. Circulation<br />

2010;121:709-729.<br />

2. The Hypothermia after Cardiac Arrest Study Group. Mild therapeutic hypothermia<br />

to improve the neurologic outcome after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med<br />

2002;346:549-556.<br />

3. Bernard SA, Gray TW, Buist MD, et al. Treatment of comatose survivors of out-ofhospital<br />

cardiac arrest with induced hypothermia. N Engl J Med 2002;346:557-563.<br />

08 <strong>TriStar</strong> Heart Journal


SCRI CV Research Update<br />

Who’s the BOSS?<br />

Steven V. Manoukian, MD, Director of Cardiovascular Research, Sarah Cannon Research Institute (SCRI)<br />

steven.manoukian@scresearch.net<br />

“BOSS, a national, randomized trial, is powered to determine whether high-dose<br />

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects 20% bicarbonate can prevent long-term loss of renal function (death, renal replacement<br />

of patients with cardiovascular disease therapy or significant decrease in GFR persisting at six months) by preventing the<br />

and nearly triples rates of short-term impact of arterial contrast on high-risk patients.”<br />

mortality and adverse ischemic events Harold L. Dauerman, MD, U.S. Co-Principal Investigator for BOSS trial and Director of Cardiac<br />

in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and Catheterization Laboratories at the University of Vermont<br />

percutaneous coronary intervention<br />

(PCI). In addition to advancing age, anemia<br />

and use of a standard regimen of a<br />

glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, CKD is a<br />

powerful risk factor for bleeding 1-2 .<br />

Beyond its adverse effects on ischemic<br />

and bleeding events, CKD increases<br />

the risk of contrast-induced nephropathy<br />

(CIN), a form of acute renal failure in<br />

patients undergoing cardiac catheterization<br />

or PCI using iodinated contrast media.<br />

CIN is associated with an increase<br />

in adverse outcomes, including mortality,<br />

need for dialysis, other adverse outcomes<br />

and prolongation (and increased<br />

cost) of hospital stay. Rates of CIN vary<br />

widely depending upon baseline renal<br />

Current SCRI Cardiovascular Research<br />

TRIAL<br />

ABILITY<br />

AMGEN - HF<br />

BOSS<br />

BRADYCARE<br />

HCRI-DAPT<br />

HESTIA<br />

ION<br />

IRASE<br />

LONGEVITY<br />

PHOENIX<br />

PREVAIL<br />

PROMISE<br />

QUICKFLEX<br />

ROCHE - ACS<br />

ROCHE - SURGERY<br />

SAPPHIRE<br />

STARFIX<br />

THRIVE<br />

USPELLA<br />

Description<br />

EP device lead follow-up<br />

function (usually estimated by the glomerular<br />

filtration rate, or eGFR) and how<br />

CIN is defined 3 . The lack of consistent efficacy<br />

has hindered consensus regarding<br />

best practices for CIN prevention.<br />

One promising CIN preventive strategy<br />

being assessed in three of SCRI’s<br />

cardiovascular strategic sites is intravenous<br />

(IV) sodium bicarbonate (NaH-<br />

CO 3<br />

). The BOSS Trial (Evaluation of<br />

Sodium Bicarbonate to Reduce Contrast-Induced<br />

Chronic Kidney Injury<br />

in Subjects with Advanced CKD who<br />

are Undergoing Angiography) is comparing<br />

IV NaHCO 3<br />

to sodium chloride<br />

(NaCl) prior to, during and after arterial<br />

angiographic procedures, such as cardiac<br />

catheterization and PCI, in patients<br />

with advanced CKD (defined as eGFR of<br />

Omecamtiv mecarbil in acute heart failure<br />

NaHCO 3<br />

to prevent CIN w/ any arterial contrast + eGFR ≤44<br />

Pacemaker programming enhancement<br />

Dual antiplatelet therapy with any BMS or DES<br />

Dronedarone with pacemaker and atrial fibrillation<br />

Paclitaxel-eluting DES<br />

Atrial fibrillation ablation<br />

EP device follow-up<br />

Cangrelor antiplatelet therapy with any DES<br />

WATCHMAN LA closure device in atrial fibrillation<br />

Chest pain imaging study<br />

EP device lead<br />

RO4905417 in stable CAD following recent ACS<br />

Human monoclonal P-selectin antibody with CABG<br />

Carotid stenting<br />

EP device lead follow-up<br />

Aortic aneurysm repair<br />

IMPELLA 2.5 cardiac support system<br />

≤44 mL/min/1.73m 2 ).<br />

Centennial Medical Center in Nashville,<br />

Tenn., Redmond Regional Medical<br />

Center in Rome, Ga., and Northside<br />

Hospital in St. Petersburg, Fla., are three<br />

of only a handful of sites participating in<br />

this multicenter, randomized U.S. trial.<br />

The BOSS Trial will determine if the use<br />

of IV NaHCO 3<br />

in patients with advanced<br />

CKD will reduce the risk of CIN and related<br />

complications. Furthermore, if the<br />

results of BOSS are favorable, NaHCO 3<br />

may form the standard-of-care for all patients<br />

undergoing procedures utilizing<br />

iodinated contrast media.<br />

The SCRI network also includes:<br />

Osceola Regional Medical Center in<br />

Kissimmee, Fla., CJW Medical Center<br />

in Richmond, Va., and Henrico Doctors’<br />

Hospital in Richmond, Va.<br />

SCRI’s cardiovascular vision is to be<br />

a leader in cardiovascular research to<br />

provide the foundation for evidencebased<br />

strategies that facilitate optimal<br />

and cost-effective patient care. <br />

For more information on SCRI’s<br />

cardiovascular research trials, visit:<br />

www.sarahcannonresearch.com/<br />

our-research/cardiovascular. To refer<br />

a patient or be added to our email list,<br />

contact us directly at (615) 329-7274<br />

or cvresearch@scresearch.net.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

1. Mehran R, Nikolsky E, Lansky AJ, et al. Impact of<br />

chronic kidney disease on early and late outcomes<br />

of patients with ACS treated with alternative<br />

antithrombotic treatment strategies: an ACUITY<br />

substudy. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009;2:748-757.<br />

2. Manoukian SV, Feit F, Mehran R, et al. Impact of<br />

major bleeding on 30-day mortality and clinical<br />

outcomes in patients with ACS: an analysis from the<br />

ACUITY Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:1362-1368.<br />

3. Jabara R, Gadesam RR, Pendyala LK, et al.<br />

Impact of the definition utilized on the rate of<br />

contrast-induced nephropathy in PCI. Am J Cardiol<br />

2009;103:1657-1662.<br />

<strong>Spring</strong> <strong>2011</strong> 09


Fixing Holes in the Heart<br />

John A. Riddick, MD, Centennial Medical Center john.riddick@hcahealthcare.com<br />

A novel percutaneous technique<br />

for repairing an atrial septal defect<br />

(ASD) or patent foramen ovale<br />

(PFO) presents an alternative to<br />

surgery for many patients. ASD,<br />

a congenital defect that occurs in<br />

approximately four of every 10,000<br />

births, is an opening in the atrial<br />

septum, or dividing wall between<br />

the two upper chambers of the<br />

John A. Riddick, MD heart, the right and left atria.<br />

PFO is more common (approximately<br />

25% of the population) and occurs when the atrial<br />

septum does not close properly. The latter defect may be<br />

associated with cryptogenic stroke (stroke with no identifiable<br />

cause).<br />

Although there are currently no FDA-approved devices<br />

for PFO closure, three approved ASD devices are widely<br />

used to close either abnormality. The Amplatzer Septal<br />

Occlusion device (AGA Medical, recently acquired by St.<br />

Jude Medical) was the first catheter-delivered ASD closure<br />

device approved in the U.S. Amplatzer utilizes the shape<br />

memory of Nitinol, a wire made from an alloy of nickel and titanium.<br />

The Nitinol wire mesh is shaped into two flat discs and a<br />

middle connector to fit the defect size, with polyester fabric inserts<br />

designed to help close the hole and provide a foundation<br />

for the growth of tissue over the occluder after placement. The<br />

device has a specific size limitation, as it only goes up to 38 mm<br />

in diameter, so defects larger than this size cannot be closed<br />

with this device.<br />

Two other available devices are the Gore Helex Septal Occluder<br />

(Gore Medical), which is a disc-like device that consists<br />

of ePTFE patch material supported by a single Nitinol wire<br />

frame and the STARflex Septal Repair Implant (NMT Medical),<br />

which includes two umbrella shaped discs, one for each side<br />

of the septum.<br />

Currently, virtually all PFOs are repaired percutaneously,<br />

despite its off-label status. However, percutaneous closure of<br />

ASDs is only appropriate for 60-70% of ASDs which are of the<br />

secundum type.<br />

Unlike open-heart surgery, these minimally invasive, catheter-based<br />

procedures typically require less than 24 hours of<br />

post-procedure observation. Conversely, surgical repair often<br />

requires a four- to five-day hospital stay, along with a longer<br />

recovery time. In a single-center study of 1,268 patients,<br />

length of hospital stay for percutaneous ASD closure was 2.8<br />

days versus 3.2 days for surgical repair. The greatest benefits<br />

of percutaneous ASD closure are decreased morbidity and<br />

complications. In 1,268 consecutive patients with isolated secundum<br />

ASD, 751 of whom underwent percutaneous closure,<br />

the complication rate was lower in the percutaneous versus<br />

surgical arm: 6.9% versus 44% 1 .<br />

PFOs are most often percutaneously closed in patients with<br />

cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attacks who have<br />

failed medical therapy. In patients with cryptogenic stroke, the<br />

prevalence of PFO increases from 25% to approximately 40%.<br />

PFO is especially common in patients who have had a stroke<br />

at age less than 55 years. For these patients, PFO closure is the<br />

typical standard of care for this patient population.<br />

The CLOSURE I trial randomized 909 cryptogenic stroke or<br />

transient ischemic attack (TIA) patients with a PFO to receive<br />

closure with the STARFlex septal closure device plus medical<br />

therapy (447 patients) or medical therapy—24-month aspirin<br />

or warfarin or combination—alone (462 patients) to<br />

measure the prevention of recurrent stroke or TIA 2 . The researchers<br />

found no increased benefit of combining PFO closure<br />

and medical therapy and reported that two-year primary<br />

composite endpoints were similar for both groups, 5.9% in the<br />

STARFlex arm versus 7.7% in the medical therapy arm.<br />

Several ongoing trials are evaluating the use of percutaneous<br />

PFO closure, such as the RESPECT trial, which is comparing<br />

device closure versus medical therapy for cryptogenic<br />

stroke.<br />

Following percutaneous ASD or PFO closure, patients are<br />

routinely treated with aspirin indefinitely and clopidogrel for<br />

six months, unless other anticoagulation is required for other<br />

indications. In addition, endocarditis prevention is recommended<br />

for at least six months following the device implant. <br />

REFERENCES:<br />

1. Butera G, Carminati M, Chessa M, et al. “Percutaneous versus surgical closure of<br />

secundum ASD: comparison of early results and complications.” Am Heart J 2006<br />

Jan;151(1):228-234.<br />

2. AHA 2010 Presentation. Furlan et al.<br />

Gore Helex Septal Occluder. Source: Gore Medical<br />

10 <strong>TriStar</strong> Heart Journal


The Final Word<br />

Prevention via Risk Factor Modification<br />

Timothy K. Kreth, MD, Summit Medical Center timothy.kreth@hcahealthcare.com<br />

Timothy K. Kreth, MD<br />

How has the COURAGE trial<br />

informed the treatment of<br />

coronary disease?<br />

As an initial management strategy<br />

in coronary artery disease, COUR-<br />

AGE reported similar outcomes<br />

for patients treated with PCI or optimal<br />

medical therapy 1 . As clinicians,<br />

we need remember this important<br />

finding because although<br />

PCI and CABG are not cures for<br />

the underlying problem, PCI is often<br />

an effective alternative to CABG. In the early days with<br />

bare-metal stents, restenosis rates were in the range of 20-<br />

25%. With the newer drug-eluting stents that prevent intimal<br />

hyperplasia, restenosis rates have been reduced to approximately<br />

5%. However, some problems with drug-eluting stents<br />

remain, such as the necessity for patients to take dual-antiplatelet<br />

therapy consisting of aspirin and either clopidogrel<br />

or prasugrel for one year, due to the risk of stent thrombosis.<br />

Ongoing investigations into new technologies, such as bioabsorbable<br />

stents, may make stents safer and more effective.<br />

Yet, we still have to address the underlying problem that allowed<br />

the disease to develop in the first place, which is where<br />

risk factor modification could be a game-changer.<br />

Which patients are appropriate for a risk factor<br />

modification strategy?<br />

It is necessary to apply a carefully planned risk factor modification<br />

strategy to patients with diagnosed coronary disease,<br />

called secondary prevention. However, it is also important for<br />

those patients who are at risk for developing heart problems,<br />

which is primary prevention. To better address these concerns,<br />

we have launched the Risk Factor Modification Clinic at Summit<br />

Medical Center in Hermitage, Tenn., which is an outlet for patients<br />

who want to avoid having a heart attack or develop heart<br />

disease, in addition to patients with known heart problems.<br />

What types of modifications does the clinic focus on?<br />

The caregivers at our clinic focus on a variety of risk factor<br />

modifications, which are directly tailored to the needs of the<br />

patient. For instance, smoking cessation is a first step. If an<br />

individual only stops smoking, they will cut their risk of dying<br />

from a heart attack in half. If a patient has elevated cholesterol,<br />

we will work to get that tightly under control through statin<br />

therapy. For diabetics, we ensure that the patients’ blood sugar<br />

is under strict control and that their hemoglobin A1c is about<br />

6-6.5%. If patients are sedentary or obese, we design exercise<br />

programs, in order for them to achieve ideal body weight.<br />

Also, we titrate medications to ensure that the patient’s blood<br />

pressure is about 120/70 mm Hg. We aggressively attempt to<br />

get our patient’s LDL below 70 mg/dL and HDL above 45 mg/<br />

dL. Unfortunately, there aren’t particularly effective drugs for<br />

raising one’s HDL, so exercise is crucial. It takes about 18-20<br />

minutes of exercise for a person to achieve his or her aerobic<br />

threshold, and HDL cholesterol production doesn’t start until<br />

that threshold is reached. Therefore, we typically recommend<br />

30 minutes of exercise at least three times a week.<br />

While we can’t change a person’s family history, gender or<br />

age, there are a number of risk factors that can be modified to<br />

reduce the risk of the patient having a stroke, heart attack or<br />

heart failure.<br />

Categorical Levels of Major,<br />

Causal Risk Factors<br />

Risk Factor<br />

Cigarette smoking<br />

Blood pressure<br />

Beyond the clinical considerations, are there any<br />

additional benefits with risk factor modification<br />

programs?<br />

In addition to the long-term improvement of patient care, prevention<br />

strategies also may save money for the U.S. healthcare<br />

system. If you just assess cholesterol management,<br />

the cost-benefit analysis suggests that statin therapy costs<br />

$40,000 per year of life saved compared with annual mammography<br />

which costs $150,000 per year of life saved for<br />

women aged 55 to 65 2 .<br />

This is certainly in line with other health prevention techniques<br />

that Americans feel are appropriate. <br />

REFERENCES:<br />

Categorical Level<br />

Any current<br />

140 mm Hg systolic<br />

90 mm Hg diastolic<br />

LDL cholesterol 160 mg/dL<br />

HDL cholesterol<br />

Plasma glucose<br />

126 mg/dL (fasting)<br />

Source: Circulation 1999;100:988-998.<br />

1. Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. “Optimal Medical Therapy with or without PCI<br />

for Stable Coronary Disease.” N Engl J Med 2007; 356:1503-1516.<br />

2. Morrison AM, Glassberg H. “Determinants of the Cost Effectiveness of Statins.”<br />

J Managed Care Pharmacy 2003; 9:544-551.<br />

<strong>Spring</strong> <strong>2011</strong> 11


110 Winners Circle Brentwood, TN 37027 thj@hcahealthcare.com cardiac.tristarhealth.com (800) 242-5662<br />

<strong>TriStar</strong> News<br />

››<br />

Cartersville began its<br />

percutaneous coronary<br />

intervention program on Jan.<br />

24, <strong>2011</strong>. They performed 34<br />

interventions since opening,<br />

including 13 patients with STelevation<br />

myocardial infarction<br />

(STEMI). Their first quarter doorto-balloon<br />

(D2B) time averaged<br />

55 minutes.<br />

››<br />

Centennial continues to make<br />

progress in improving its D2B<br />

times for STEMI. A new facility<br />

record was achieved earlier this<br />

spring, resulting in a 17 minute<br />

D2B time.<br />

››<br />

Greenview Hospital offers<br />

a wide spectrum of services,<br />

including EKG, holter monitoring,<br />

echocardiography, stress testing,<br />

cardiac catheterization and stent<br />

placement.<br />

››<br />

The recent addition of a 64-slice<br />

CT scanner to Hendersonville’s<br />

diagnostic imaging arsenal<br />

allows for faster, clearer<br />

imaging of the heart, aiding<br />

in the capability to detect<br />

cardiovascular disease.<br />

››<br />

Horizon’s emergency<br />

department recently expanded<br />

by opening 10 new beds and<br />

a new observation unit will be<br />

completed this summer.<br />

››<br />

The cardiac rehabilitation<br />

program at Parkridge, which<br />

is accredited by the American<br />

Association of Cardiovascular and<br />

Pulmonary Rehabilitation, has had<br />

a record number of participants<br />

in 2010. The program has three<br />

phases of rehabilitation including<br />

inpatient, monitored outpatient<br />

with physician supervision,<br />

and a minimally supervised<br />

maintenance exercise program.<br />

››<br />

Fifty-two minutes was the average<br />

D2B time for Redmond Regional<br />

for the first quarter of <strong>2011</strong>.<br />

››<br />

Nashville Fire Department medics<br />

Alex Spencer and Russ Wilson<br />

recently performed a transfer of a<br />

patient with 95% blockage of his<br />

right coronary artery to Skyline.<br />

Their early detection led to a D2B<br />

time of 60 minutes.<br />

››<br />

The emergency and cardiology<br />

teams at Southern Hills hold an<br />

average D2B time of 55 minutes<br />

compared with the national<br />

benchmark goal of 90 minutes.<br />

››<br />

StoneCrest has acquired a new<br />

cardiovascular and interventional<br />

digital imaging system that<br />

enables physicians to perform<br />

both cardiac and vascular exams<br />

on patients with a single system.<br />

The new system can provide a<br />

wide range of image-guided,<br />

minimally invasive treatment<br />

options that offer patients<br />

advantages over traditional<br />

surgery.<br />

› › Summit recently completed the<br />

second segment of its threephase<br />

emergency department<br />

expansion project. Projected<br />

completion of the renovation<br />

is scheduled for July and will<br />

increase capacity to 32 beds.<br />

In addition, Summit now offers<br />

24/7 interventional cardiology<br />

coverage and has implemented<br />

new therapeutic hypothermia<br />

protocols.<br />

12 <strong>TriStar</strong> Heart Journal

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!