01.06.2015 Views

China's Telecommunications Universal Service in ... - Is.me.titech.ac.jp

China's Telecommunications Universal Service in ... - Is.me.titech.ac.jp

China's Telecommunications Universal Service in ... - Is.me.titech.ac.jp

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ch<strong>in</strong>a’s<br />

<strong>Telecommunications</strong><br />

<strong>Universal</strong> <strong>Service</strong> <strong>in</strong> a<br />

Competitive Environ<strong>me</strong>nt<br />

M<strong>in</strong>gzhi Li and J<strong>in</strong> Wang<br />

School of Economics and Manage<strong>me</strong>nt,<br />

Ts<strong>in</strong>ghua University<br />

August 2003


Outl<strong>in</strong>e of the paper<br />

• Introduction<br />

• History of Telecom Deregulation and <strong>Universal</strong><br />

<strong>Service</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

• Provision of <strong>Universal</strong> <strong>Service</strong> <strong>in</strong> a Competitive<br />

Environ<strong>me</strong>nt: Recipes from Economic Theory<br />

• International experience <strong>in</strong> telecommunications<br />

universal service<br />

• Conclusions: Steps for Provid<strong>in</strong>g Ch<strong>in</strong>a’s<br />

<strong>Universal</strong> <strong>Service</strong>s <strong>in</strong> <strong>Telecommunications</strong>


1. Introduction<br />

Why should we provide universal<br />

service <strong>in</strong> telecommunications


1. Introduction<br />

Reasons for Telecom <strong>Universal</strong> <strong>Service</strong>:<br />

• Necessity/Merit Goods<br />

• Network Externality<br />

• the concern for economic develop<strong>me</strong>nt and<br />

spatial <strong>in</strong>equality


Table 2 The GDP per Capita <strong>in</strong> The Three<br />

Regions (RMB yuan)<br />

1997<br />

1998<br />

1999<br />

Eastern<br />

region<br />

9298.877<br />

10032.02<br />

10693.4<br />

Central<br />

region<br />

4852.37<br />

5136.056<br />

5285.528<br />

Western<br />

region<br />

3810.008<br />

4051.929<br />

4216.937


Table 3 Level of Ch<strong>in</strong>a’s s <strong>Telecommunications</strong><br />

<strong>Service</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2001<br />

Telephone<br />

Penetration<br />

Rate<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong> L<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Ma<strong>in</strong><br />

L<strong>in</strong>es <strong>in</strong><br />

City<br />

Household<br />

Penetration<br />

Rate<br />

Public<br />

Phone Per<br />

Hundred<br />

Citizens<br />

Cell Phone<br />

Penetration<br />

Rate<br />

The whole<br />

nation<br />

(per hundred<br />

people)<br />

25.90<br />

(per<br />

hundred<br />

people)<br />

13.90<br />

(per<br />

hundred<br />

people)<br />

20.40<br />

(per<br />

hundred<br />

people)<br />

11.55<br />

(per<br />

hundred<br />

people)<br />

0.27<br />

(per hundred<br />

people)<br />

11.20<br />

Eastern<br />

41.47<br />

20.81<br />

21.24<br />

16.76<br />

0.40<br />

19.30<br />

Central<br />

20.35<br />

12.02<br />

18.14<br />

10.25<br />

0.20<br />

7.75<br />

Western<br />

16.97<br />

9.22<br />

21.68<br />

7.21<br />

0.23<br />

7.20


Table 1 Telephones per 100 people VS. GDP per capita<br />

<strong>in</strong> the year-end of 2001<br />

GDP per<br />

capita (? )<br />

Telephones l<strong>in</strong>es per 100<br />

people<br />

Western 5006.843 16.97<br />

Middle 6658.61 20.35<br />

Eastern 13539.87 41.47


Figure 1 <strong>Telecommunications</strong> f<strong>ac</strong>ilities per capita<br />

at the year-end of 2001<br />

GDP per capital<br />

15000<br />

10000<br />

5000<br />

0<br />

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5<br />

telephones/people<br />

Source:


2. History of Telecom<br />

Deregualation and <strong>Universal</strong><br />

<strong>Service</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

• History of <strong>Universal</strong> <strong>Service</strong> <strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

• Regional Disparity <strong>in</strong> Economic<br />

Develop<strong>me</strong>nt and <strong>Universal</strong> <strong>Service</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a


History of <strong>Universal</strong> <strong>Service</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

In the early 1990s, the monopoly provider<br />

of Ch<strong>in</strong>a’s telecommunications <strong>in</strong>dustry——<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a Telecom <strong>in</strong>itiated the massive project<br />

“telephone connection to every<br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istrative village <strong>in</strong> the rural districts”.


Percentage of Villages<br />

with Telephone Connection<br />

100.00%<br />

80.00%<br />

79.80%<br />

67.10%<br />

60.00% 53.50% 55.60%<br />

40.00%<br />

20.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

1996 1997 1998 1999


History of <strong>Universal</strong> <strong>Service</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

In 1999, Ch<strong>in</strong>a Telecom was broken up .<br />

The entire telecommunication <strong>in</strong>dustry was<br />

made up of seven operat<strong>in</strong>g companies ——<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a Telecom, Ch<strong>in</strong>a Unicom, Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

Netcom, Ch<strong>in</strong>a Jitong, Ch<strong>in</strong>a Railcom and<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a Satellite. However, the universal<br />

service was still born by “Ch<strong>in</strong>a Telecom”.


History of <strong>Universal</strong> <strong>Service</strong><br />

In 2002, ch<strong>in</strong>a’s<br />

telecommunications<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry experienced a<br />

second round of reform.<br />

The market of<br />

telecommunication is now<br />

made up of six operat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

companies——Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

Telecom, Ch<strong>in</strong>a Netcom,<br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a Mobile, Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

Unicom, Ch<strong>in</strong>a Satellite<br />

and Ch<strong>in</strong>a Railcom .<br />

<strong>in</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

Figure 2 the market share of ch<strong>in</strong>a's<br />

telecommunication <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> 2002<br />

17.20%<br />

11.30% 1.10%<br />

33.80%<br />

ch<strong>in</strong>a mobile<br />

ch<strong>in</strong>a telecom<br />

ch<strong>in</strong>a netcom<br />

ch<strong>in</strong>a unicom<br />

ch<strong>in</strong>a sat and ch<strong>in</strong>arailcom<br />

36.60%


<strong>Universal</strong> <strong>Service</strong> Process Slowed<br />

down after Deregulation<br />

Increase of Telephone Connection <strong>in</strong> <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>a's</strong><br />

Rural Areas<br />

10 thousand<br />

2000<br />

1763 1630<br />

1000<br />

1003<br />

0<br />

2000 2001 2002


Percentage of Villiages with Telephone Connection<br />

150.00%<br />

100.00%<br />

50.00%<br />

0.00%<br />

85.30% 96%<br />

Whole<br />

nation<br />

East<br />

73%<br />

40%<br />

West Q<strong>in</strong>ghai<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

55%<br />

Gansu<br />

Prov<strong>in</strong>ce


History of <strong>Universal</strong> <strong>Service</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

Ch<strong>in</strong>a<br />

Market Monopoly Competition<br />

<strong>Universal</strong><br />

<strong>Service</strong> Ch<strong>in</strong>a telecom ????<br />

Provider


3. Provision of <strong>Universal</strong><br />

<strong>Service</strong> <strong>in</strong> a Competitive<br />

Environ<strong>me</strong>nt: Recipes from<br />

Economic Theory


Monopoly: Cross-Subsidy


In a Competitive Environ<strong>me</strong>nt<br />

Case 1: Sym<strong>me</strong>tric Entrance


In a Competitive Environ<strong>me</strong>nt<br />

Case 1: Asym<strong>me</strong>tric Entrance


Provision of <strong>Universal</strong> <strong>Service</strong> <strong>in</strong> a<br />

Competitive Environ<strong>me</strong>nt: Recipes<br />

from Economic Theory<br />

monopoly<br />

competition<br />

Fund<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

cross-subsidy<br />

• general tax system<br />

• universal service fund<br />

Provision: the monopoly<br />

the w<strong>in</strong>ner <strong>in</strong> auction


4. International Experience<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>Telecommunications</strong><br />

<strong>Universal</strong> <strong>Service</strong><br />

• the United States<br />

• Peru


5. Conclusions: Steps for<br />

Provid<strong>in</strong>g Ch<strong>in</strong>a’s s <strong>Universal</strong><br />

<strong>Service</strong>s <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>Telecommunications</strong><br />

First, sett<strong>in</strong>g the goals and scopes of<br />

universal service <strong>in</strong> telecommunications


Table 4: Five Stages of <strong>Universal</strong> <strong>Service</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>Telecommunications</strong>


Second, determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g quality require<strong>me</strong>nt<br />

and pric<strong>in</strong>g policy


Third, choose the source of fund<strong>in</strong>g for<br />

universal service.


Fourth, choos<strong>in</strong>g the provider of universal<br />

service

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!