01.06.2015 Views

MAGAZINE - Dolphin.upenn.edu - University of Pennsylvania

MAGAZINE - Dolphin.upenn.edu - University of Pennsylvania

MAGAZINE - Dolphin.upenn.edu - University of Pennsylvania

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Submit<br />

your<br />

photos<br />

and<br />

writing<br />

to<br />

fcpaper@<br />

gmail.com<br />

14 FIRST CALL MARCH 24, 2008<br />

planations. As “Commuting in America<br />

III” suggests, some <strong>of</strong> this is due to a<br />

trend <strong>of</strong> Americans seeking to simply<br />

avoid the rush hour, with more and<br />

more workers beginning their commutes<br />

before 6:00 am or after 9:00<br />

am (the 64% <strong>of</strong> working Americans<br />

falling in this range was 67% a decade<br />

before). Some <strong>of</strong> it is also due to an<br />

interesting movement where many<br />

Americans are starting to live in cities<br />

and work in the suburbs, rather than<br />

the other way around. Then there is<br />

always population growth, another<br />

decent explanation, and with that<br />

comes the issue <strong>of</strong> traffic.<br />

Traffic, actually, is a rather good<br />

explanation, and it’s easy to complain<br />

about. The Texas Transportation Institute<br />

produces an annual “Urban<br />

Mobility” report that measures all the<br />

extra time we have to spend in traffic –<br />

that is, the additional time we spend<br />

on the road solely due to congestion.<br />

For the “average peak period traveler”<br />

(so, only looking at workers driving<br />

during rush-hour) in 2007, this added<br />

up to an extra 38 hours <strong>of</strong> traveling<br />

each year. That’s over one and a half<br />

days, above and beyond usual travel<br />

times, just because <strong>of</strong> traffic. They<br />

also went a step further and calculated<br />

how much it cost us: 26 extra<br />

gallons in fuel, adding up to $710 per<br />

traveler in 2007. To determine these<br />

figures, the study looked at 437 specific<br />

U.S. urban areas that ranged in<br />

population. If you just look at those<br />

areas with populations <strong>of</strong> more than 3<br />

million, that figure jumps to 54 hours.<br />

Among them, the Philadelphia urban<br />

area retains the national average <strong>of</strong> 38<br />

hours. Based on this national figure,<br />

that’s still adding another 9 minutes<br />

to the daily commute <strong>of</strong> drivers.<br />

For whatever reason things are<br />

getting worse, though, it’s worth questioning<br />

why we are accepting it. Don’t<br />

we care? Couldn’t we take a closer job,<br />

or if not, at least move closer to work?<br />

We have people in the cities working in<br />

the suburbs and people in the suburbs<br />

working in the cities – that makes no<br />

sense. Why don’t they switch homes?<br />

Or jobs?<br />

The best explanation I’ve read,<br />

honestly, is that people are just, kind<br />

<strong>of</strong>… too dumb to notice. A little while<br />

ago, economists Bruno Frey and<br />

Alois Stutzer <strong>of</strong> the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Zurich<br />

published a report titled “Stress<br />

That Doesn’t Pay: The Commuting<br />

Paradox.” It was a psychological study<br />

seeking to determine how people value<br />

their commutes relative to compensation.<br />

The results showed that, if you<br />

were to increase your commute time<br />

from zero to an hour each way, your<br />

salary would have to increase by 40%<br />

to satisfyingly make up for it. That implies<br />

that those who commute should<br />

be receiving significantly more compensation<br />

than those who don’t, but<br />

this simply isn’t happening. Hence<br />

the “Commuting Paradox”: people are<br />

commuting even though it’s terrible.<br />

They’re simply not realizing they need<br />

to be paid more for the unhappiness<br />

<strong>of</strong> it.<br />

Now, there may be plenty <strong>of</strong> other<br />

good explanations, but already I’ve<br />

provided an abundance <strong>of</strong> statistics,<br />

and you’re probably wondering exactly<br />

what my point is. You could be<br />

thinking I want to encourage my fellow<br />

Americans to recognize their nonsensical<br />

habits <strong>of</strong> commuting. Maybe<br />

I want everyone to take a closer look at<br />

their situation and decide if their own<br />

commutes are really worth it. Maybe<br />

I have some great ambitious plans to<br />

fix traffic, commuting times, and early<br />

wake-ups. Maybe I’m trying to warn<br />

the rest <strong>of</strong> the student population<br />

about life after school. Or maybe I just<br />

get some sick pleasure out <strong>of</strong> alarming<br />

anyone who will listen about the<br />

inevitable impending doom!<br />

Well, if you were supposing any<br />

<strong>of</strong> those things, you were wrong. Really,<br />

this is all one big elaborate rationalization<br />

for those two previously<br />

described incidents that took place<br />

during my own commutes home from<br />

work. Clearly, in the horrible times we<br />

are suffering, these things are bound<br />

to happen. My commute at the time<br />

was far above average, 90 minutes<br />

each way. Of course I’m going to be in<br />

a rush, and it’s just common courtesy<br />

to give me more space. So the next<br />

time some old lady gets in my way, I’ll<br />

tell her, “Sorry, times have changed.<br />

Now move it.” And as for that blind<br />

man – well, okay, maybe I still don’t<br />

have much <strong>of</strong> an excuse there. If you’re<br />

reading this, sorry about that. FC<br />

Michael Sall is a junior<br />

in Wharton and the College.<br />

You can write to him at sallms@wharton.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!