The Barry Davis Workshop: Funding Opportunities for the New ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

• Typos (!!) Common weaknesses • Difficult to read/follow - use diagrams/drawings for complex ideas • Over- or under-ambitious • Not enough preliminary data • Project not well described in context of current literature • No consideration of pitfalls and alternatives • Specific aims are interdependent- avoid the domino effect
Common weaknesses • No letters of support from collaborators/ consultants • Lack of attention to vertebrate animal or human subjects sections • Questions about your independence (R03 and R01s) • For revised applications: Not responsive enough to previous reviews- don’t ignore a comment you don’t like and don’t be argumentative. • Submitting before it is “ready to go” • Not contacting your Program Officer
Page 1 and 2: The Barry Davis Workshop: Funding O
Page 3 and 4: National Institute on Deafness and
Page 5 and 6: NIDCD Extramural Staff Program Offi
Page 7 and 8: Individual NRSA Fellowships (Fs)
Page 9 and 10: • NIDCD Program Contacts: Drs. Br
Page 11 and 12: New Investigator (NI) and an Early
Page 13 and 14: Preparing to submit • Establish a
Page 15 and 16: Once assigned to study section Scie
Page 17 and 18: Scoring Impact Score Descriptor Hig
Page 19 and 20: Scored Review Criteria Fellowships
Page 21 and 22: Preliminary scores & streamlining O
Page 23 and 24: “Discussed” Applications • As
Page 25: Funding Decision to Award • Fundi

The Barry Davis Workshop: Funding Opportunities for the New ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?