PL100058 APPE AR ANCES - Ontario Municipal Board
PL100058 APPE AR ANCES - Ontario Municipal Board
PL100058 APPE AR ANCES - Ontario Municipal Board
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
- 2 - <strong>PL100058</strong><br />
1812502 <strong>Ontario</strong> Inc. J. Meader<br />
L. Townsend (in absentia)<br />
Edgemere Estates Limited<br />
Paletta International Corporation, By-ways<br />
Construction Inc., and Ryan Lee<br />
Investments Inc.<br />
J. Meader<br />
L. Townsend (in absentia)<br />
N. Smith<br />
S. Snider (in absentia)<br />
MEMORANDUM OF ORAL DECISION DELIVERED BY JAMES R. McKENZIE<br />
ON AUGUST 4, 2011, AND ORDER OF THE BO<strong>AR</strong>D<br />
With the Phase One this proceeding, the Livable Oakville Plan, now complete<br />
and a <strong>Board</strong> Decision and Order in place with respect thereto, this Pre-Hearing<br />
Conference (PHC) was convened for the purposes of addressing proposed<br />
modifications implementing settlements regarding three site-specific appeals and<br />
securing an initial time-line for the 10 outstanding site-specific appeals of Phase Two.<br />
Proposed Modifications<br />
The proposed modifications pertain to Appeal Nos. 1, 9, and 12. Ms Baker<br />
reported that the modifications were being tabled on consent.<br />
The <strong>Board</strong> was presented with an affidavit executed by Dana Anderson. Ms<br />
Anderson is the Director of Planning Services in the Planning Department of the Town<br />
of Oakville. She is a Registered Professional Planner and Member of the Canadian<br />
Institute of Planners and the <strong>Ontario</strong> Professional Planners Institute.<br />
The proposed modifications are set out in “Attachment 1” to this Decision; it is<br />
unnecessary to describe their details here. The modifications provide clarification and<br />
resolve both policy and site-specific issues in connection with the three site-specific<br />
appeals. It is Ms Anderson’s professional planning opinion that the modifications are<br />
consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, and conform to both the Growth Plan<br />
and the Region of Halton’s Official Plan. It is also her opinion that the modifications<br />
represent good planning and are in the public interest.