09.06.2015 Views

PL100058 APPE AR ANCES - Ontario Municipal Board

PL100058 APPE AR ANCES - Ontario Municipal Board

PL100058 APPE AR ANCES - Ontario Municipal Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- 2 - <strong>PL100058</strong><br />

1812502 <strong>Ontario</strong> Inc. J. Meader<br />

L. Townsend (in absentia)<br />

Edgemere Estates Limited<br />

Paletta International Corporation, By-ways<br />

Construction Inc., and Ryan Lee<br />

Investments Inc.<br />

J. Meader<br />

L. Townsend (in absentia)<br />

N. Smith<br />

S. Snider (in absentia)<br />

MEMORANDUM OF ORAL DECISION DELIVERED BY JAMES R. McKENZIE<br />

ON AUGUST 4, 2011, AND ORDER OF THE BO<strong>AR</strong>D<br />

With the Phase One this proceeding, the Livable Oakville Plan, now complete<br />

and a <strong>Board</strong> Decision and Order in place with respect thereto, this Pre-Hearing<br />

Conference (PHC) was convened for the purposes of addressing proposed<br />

modifications implementing settlements regarding three site-specific appeals and<br />

securing an initial time-line for the 10 outstanding site-specific appeals of Phase Two.<br />

Proposed Modifications<br />

The proposed modifications pertain to Appeal Nos. 1, 9, and 12. Ms Baker<br />

reported that the modifications were being tabled on consent.<br />

The <strong>Board</strong> was presented with an affidavit executed by Dana Anderson. Ms<br />

Anderson is the Director of Planning Services in the Planning Department of the Town<br />

of Oakville. She is a Registered Professional Planner and Member of the Canadian<br />

Institute of Planners and the <strong>Ontario</strong> Professional Planners Institute.<br />

The proposed modifications are set out in “Attachment 1” to this Decision; it is<br />

unnecessary to describe their details here. The modifications provide clarification and<br />

resolve both policy and site-specific issues in connection with the three site-specific<br />

appeals. It is Ms Anderson’s professional planning opinion that the modifications are<br />

consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, and conform to both the Growth Plan<br />

and the Region of Halton’s Official Plan. It is also her opinion that the modifications<br />

represent good planning and are in the public interest.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!