a.1 - Natal Law Society
a.1 - Natal Law Society
a.1 - Natal Law Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
AGM MINUTES - 5 - 12 OCTOBER 2012<br />
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />
Govender stated that the LSSA’s focus had been primarily on the issues surrounding the<br />
Legal Practice Bill and that discussions had progressed to the point that there was<br />
substantial agreement by stakeholders and that representations would be made to the<br />
Portfolio Committee on matters of divergence and allow the process to move forward.<br />
Some of the issues of concern with the Draft LPB were:<br />
‣ The appointments to the Legal Practice Council as there was an overly large number<br />
of ministerial appointments on the Council.<br />
In terms of the agreements reached there will be no ministerial appointments in<br />
respect of the legal practitioners’ component. The Minister will have possibly a<br />
maximum of three, which might be reduced by way of representation from the LSSA.<br />
‣ The provisions for the accreditation of voluntary associations.<br />
The LSSA argued against these provisions and, it appears, successfully as a number of<br />
these provisions have been removed.<br />
‣ The accreditation of conveyancers and notaries was not restricted to admitted<br />
attorneys but following LSSA intervention this issue has been addressed and it is<br />
expected that the accreditation of conveyancers and notaries would be limited to<br />
those who are admitted attorneys or practising attorneys.<br />
‣ The Bill makes provision for easy movement of persons who wish to be removed from<br />
the roll of attorneys and to be enrolled as an advocate and vice-versa. There is<br />
ongoing discussion and engagement with the Bar Council in this regard.<br />
‣ In terms of the provisions of the Bill, a Transitional Council will take control until a<br />
Legal Practice Council is established. There is debate about the need for a<br />
Transitional Council as there is a strong view amongst some of the stakeholders that<br />
the progress made this year in reaching unanimity on most of the major issues is<br />
sufficient to warrant the Bill being passed with a Legal Practice Council being put in<br />
place. Should there remain a need for a Transitional Council it is the view that it<br />
should exist for no more than six months rather than the two years provided for in<br />
the Bill.<br />
‣ The issue of the investigation of complaints against legal practitioners to be<br />
conducted at Regional Council level is a broad area that requires consideration as the<br />
draft anticipates a Regional Council comprising both advocates and attorneys.<br />
The Co- Chair stated that the Bill brings about an important change for the governance of<br />
the legal profession as a whole under a single regulatory authority.<br />
He added that, apart from having to grapple with the issues surrounding the Legal Practice<br />
Bill, the LSSA engaged inter alia with: