Electronic Publishing: The Year 2012 in Review e-Books Come of ...
Electronic Publishing: The Year 2012 in Review e-Books Come of ...
Electronic Publishing: The Year 2012 in Review e-Books Come of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
However, <strong>in</strong> order to participate <strong>in</strong> KDP Select, Amazon requires exclusivity for at least<br />
90 days. This deprives rivals such as Apple’s i<strong>Books</strong>tore, Barnes & Noble and<br />
Smashwords.com, from tens <strong>of</strong> thousands <strong>of</strong> titles.<br />
“Amazon flexes muscle with exclusivity, says Mark Coker, founder <strong>of</strong> Smashwords, an<br />
early (and free) e-Book publish<strong>in</strong>g service that now boasts more than 190,000 titles, and<br />
is the largest distributor <strong>of</strong> self-published e-<strong>Books</strong>. Forbes.com called it “Apple’s biggest<br />
unknown supplier <strong>of</strong> e-<strong>Books</strong>.”<br />
“While no one is pay<strong>in</strong>g attention, Amazon’s work<strong>in</strong>g to lock <strong>in</strong>die authors <strong>in</strong>to their<br />
platform with KDP Select. Publishers don’t care, because they don’t yet understand that<br />
authors are the future <strong>of</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g,” Coker <strong>in</strong>sists.<br />
THE APPLE MONOCULTURE: Apple became a serious player <strong>in</strong> the e-Book and<br />
self-publish<strong>in</strong>g worlds later <strong>in</strong> the game than Amazon, largely due to the wild popularity<br />
<strong>of</strong> the iPad. While the game-chang<strong>in</strong>g iPhone was more than e-Book capable, the iPad<br />
posed Apple’s first serious challenge to the K<strong>in</strong>dle as an e-Book read<strong>in</strong>g device.<br />
However, with its “walled garden” philosophy and a captive audience <strong>of</strong> fanatic<br />
followers unlikely to change brands regardless <strong>of</strong> advantages <strong>of</strong>fered by competitors,<br />
Apple has not (as yet) been as welcom<strong>in</strong>g to e-Book developers or to self-publish<strong>in</strong>g<br />
writers as Amazon... except those who are prepared to turn their backs on other outlets.<br />
Yet its legions <strong>of</strong> loyal customers make Apple a potent force to acknowledge <strong>in</strong> <strong>2012</strong> and<br />
beyond. As the next section expla<strong>in</strong>s, Apple is tak<strong>in</strong>g this challenge seriously.<br />
PLAYING HARDBALL: With billions <strong>of</strong> dollars per year now at stake, competition <strong>in</strong><br />
the marketplace for e-<strong>Books</strong> has grown more cutthroat than ever. Apple made headl<strong>in</strong>es<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>2012</strong> when it was sued by the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Justice for conspir<strong>in</strong>g to fix e-Book<br />
prices with Macmillan, Pengu<strong>in</strong>, Hachette, HarperColl<strong>in</strong>s, and Simon & Schuster. Apple<br />
was also lambasted for claim<strong>in</strong>g exclusive rights to e-<strong>Books</strong> formatted us<strong>in</strong>g its “iBook”<br />
tool, even if the author or publisher removed the e-Book from the i<strong>Books</strong>tore. On its part,<br />
Amazon has faced criticism for its exclusivity policies, for royalty structures that<br />
suppress e-Book prices, and (prior to the DOJ lawsuit aga<strong>in</strong>st Apple) for sell<strong>in</strong>g e-<strong>Books</strong><br />
at a loss <strong>in</strong> order to stifle competition. While Google has made progress <strong>in</strong> <strong>2012</strong> toward<br />
settl<strong>in</strong>g its long-runn<strong>in</strong>g dispute with the Association <strong>of</strong> American Publishers and the<br />
Author’s Guild for scann<strong>in</strong>g millions <strong>of</strong> books without permission, its “Google Play” e-<br />
Book store has been relatively absent from the headl<strong>in</strong>es this year.<br />
Foresighted observers <strong>of</strong> the publish<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustry caution authors and publishers aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />
underestimat<strong>in</strong>g the power <strong>of</strong> the big onl<strong>in</strong>e booksellers to sway consumer preferences,<br />
which the giants are actively try<strong>in</strong>g to do. Major booksellers clearly recognize that their<br />
bottom l<strong>in</strong>es are fatter from sales <strong>of</strong> “clicks” rather than “bricks” when there is no<br />
physical <strong>in</strong>ventory.<br />
As a result, many authors and publishers feel that their pr<strong>in</strong>t publish<strong>in</strong>g options are more<br />
limited, and more costly, than e-<strong>Books</strong>. Meanwhile, consumers are lured by the low<br />
prices <strong>of</strong> e-<strong>Books</strong> and <strong>in</strong>stant gratification. If a lay reader can buy the same story for $5