13.06.2015 Views

Product protection in the Food Supply chain

Product protection in the Food Supply chain

Product protection in the Food Supply chain

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TNO report<br />

BU2.00/011957-1/KC<br />

<strong>Product</strong> <strong>protection</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong><br />

1. Introduction<br />

Packag<strong>in</strong>g materials play an important role <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> transport of foodstuffs. By apply<strong>in</strong>g proper packag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

range over which food products are transported can be extended and shelf life can be prolonged. Packag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

protects <strong>the</strong> food product from mechanical damage, microbial and chemical contam<strong>in</strong>ation. This is<br />

important for human and product safety.<br />

The European corrugated board <strong>in</strong>dustry is a responsible <strong>in</strong>dustry and studies <strong>in</strong> detail <strong>the</strong> quality delivered.<br />

To perform jo<strong>in</strong>t studies <strong>the</strong> corrugated board manufacturers have toge<strong>the</strong>r with its suppliers of corrugat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

material formed ProBox. The mission of ProBox is to foster growth and to demonstrate that corrugated<br />

board is fit for its purpose and safe to use, based on credible and persuasive evidence, that corrugated board<br />

should be <strong>the</strong> packag<strong>in</strong>g material of choice.<br />

With<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> ProBox organisation a Study Work<strong>in</strong>g Group is active focuss<strong>in</strong>g towards product safety.<br />

The Study Work<strong>in</strong>g Group is a team of scientific and bus<strong>in</strong>ess experts with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> corrugated board <strong>in</strong>dustry,<br />

which performed a literature survey <strong>in</strong> 1997. This survey showed that a lot of <strong>in</strong>formation is available<br />

concern<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> characteristics of <strong>the</strong> corrugated packag<strong>in</strong>g itself. However, additional <strong>in</strong>formation about <strong>the</strong><br />

suitability of corrugated board packag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> connection with foodstuffs was needed.<br />

ProBox has commended to European Institutes a study focuss<strong>in</strong>g towards <strong>the</strong> relation between corrugated<br />

board and <strong>the</strong> packed foodstuffs throughout real life.<br />

1.1 Project objective<br />

To obta<strong>in</strong> scientific data that provides <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> strengths and weaknesses of Corrugated Board Boxes<br />

<strong>in</strong> terms of <strong>the</strong> impact towards <strong>the</strong> packed product and <strong>the</strong> risk probability for human be<strong>in</strong>gs for<br />

Mechanical, Chemical, Sensory and Microbial aspects.<br />

1.2 Project deliverables<br />

The ProBox product <strong>protection</strong> project should provide:<br />

• scientific <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> (absence of) impact from corrugated board towards human health<br />

• suitability of <strong>the</strong> corrugated material <strong>in</strong> terms of purity and impact compared to <strong>the</strong> foodstuff<br />

• <strong>in</strong>sight knowledge on <strong>the</strong> <strong>protection</strong> of food by corrugated packag<strong>in</strong>gs throughout <strong>the</strong> supply cha<strong>in</strong><br />

from moment of packag<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> shelf<br />

• create opportunities for quality improvements by corrugated board packag<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

1.3 Scope/accountability<br />

• The need of <strong>the</strong> study has been def<strong>in</strong>ed by <strong>the</strong> Study Work<strong>in</strong>g Group with<strong>in</strong> ProBox<br />

• The Study Work<strong>in</strong>g Group is composed of: Dr. F. Herder-Wynne (Kappa Packag<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong><br />

Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands), Dr. A. Weber (Metsä Serla, F<strong>in</strong>land), Dr. S. Armagnacq (Smurfit, France), Dr. A. Fried<br />

(SCA, Germany) and Mr. A. Haglund (AssiDomän, Sweden)<br />

• The approach of <strong>the</strong> study is developed by <strong>in</strong>volved scientific <strong>in</strong>stitutes and has been endorsed by<br />

group of <strong>in</strong>dependent peer reviewers<br />

• ProBox is fund<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> project however <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutes acted <strong>in</strong>dependently<br />

• Research Institutes <strong>in</strong>volved are SIK <strong>in</strong> Sweden for microbiology, PIRA <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> UK for Fitness for<br />

Purpose (mechanical aspects), Fraunhofer <strong>in</strong> Germany for chemical analysis and TNO Nutrition and<br />

<strong>Food</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands for sensory analysis.<br />

• TNO Paper and Board <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands acted as <strong>in</strong>dependent scientific co-ord<strong>in</strong>ator and was<br />

supported by <strong>the</strong> Study Work<strong>in</strong>g Group of ProBox for <strong>the</strong> relevant <strong>in</strong>dustrial aspects<br />

• Research <strong>in</strong>stitutes are accountable for <strong>the</strong>ir own research f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs and <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terpretation of <strong>the</strong>se<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

• Research <strong>in</strong>stitutes were supported by <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual Study Work<strong>in</strong>g Group members <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir specific<br />

discipl<strong>in</strong>e related to corrugated packag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

1


TNO report<br />

BU2.00/011957-1/KC<br />

<strong>Product</strong> <strong>protection</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong><br />

2. Performance<br />

In <strong>the</strong> ProBox product <strong>protection</strong> project food transports are followed from pack<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> product till <strong>the</strong><br />

unpack<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> shop (retailer). These transports are called <strong>Product</strong> Path Comb<strong>in</strong>ations (PPC) because <strong>the</strong>y<br />

<strong>in</strong>volve <strong>the</strong> product and corrugated packag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ation with each o<strong>the</strong>r and <strong>the</strong> places of pack<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

repack<strong>in</strong>g and unpack<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>the</strong> transport itself.<br />

2.1 Criteria for select<strong>in</strong>g a <strong>Product</strong> Path Comb<strong>in</strong>ation (PPC)<br />

Criteria product:<br />

• Relevant <strong>in</strong> application of corrugated materials<br />

• Representativity: volume<br />

• Expected risk: Impact on product/risk probability for human<br />

• Preferably direct contact: food <strong>in</strong> contact with <strong>the</strong> packag<strong>in</strong>g material<br />

• Preferably sensitive products<br />

Criteria path:<br />

• Real–life sampl<strong>in</strong>g: <strong>the</strong> <strong>Product</strong> Path should exist and is accessible<br />

• Representativity: countries <strong>in</strong>volved, with<strong>in</strong> Europe<br />

• Diversity: Involve a packer/filler only once<br />

• Temperature: ambient or cooled, no frozen<br />

• Contact time: short path (≤2 days) or long path (>2 days)<br />

2.2 Performance of <strong>the</strong> study<br />

Samples are taken at several places dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>Product</strong> Path Comb<strong>in</strong>ation and for each product path a<br />

recorder was used to monitor journey conditions of <strong>the</strong> palletised product and of <strong>the</strong> roll cage. The recorder<br />

was attached to <strong>the</strong> pallet before load<strong>in</strong>g, replaced at <strong>the</strong> distribution centre to a roll cage and stopped<br />

measur<strong>in</strong>g after <strong>the</strong> products were unloaded at <strong>the</strong> shop. The data recorder provided data on vibration,<br />

shock, temperature and humidity.<br />

Grower<br />

Pack<strong>in</strong>g<br />

D<br />

Transport<br />

by truck<br />

D<br />

Distribution<br />

Centre<br />

D<br />

Transport<br />

by truck<br />

D<br />

Unpack<strong>in</strong>g<br />

SHOP<br />

S<br />

S<br />

Microbiology: air, product, corrugated board<br />

Fitness For Purpose: box corrugated board box<br />

Chemical analysis: corrugated board box<br />

Sensory analysis: product, corrugated board box<br />

S<br />

D<br />

= Sampl<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

= Datalogg<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Microbiology: air, product, corrugated board<br />

Sensory analysis: box product, corrugated board box<br />

Fitness for Purpose: visual <strong>in</strong>spection<br />

Figure 1: real life study (set-up)<br />

2


TNO report<br />

BU2.00/011957-1/KC<br />

<strong>Product</strong> <strong>protection</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong><br />

2.3 Description of 7 <strong>Product</strong> Path Comb<strong>in</strong>ations (PPC)<br />

Underneath can be found what materials are used and tested under what conditions dur<strong>in</strong>g which product path.<br />

Table 1: overview of tested materials<br />

<strong>Product</strong> Orig<strong>in</strong> and dest<strong>in</strong>ation Box Pallet Conditions dur<strong>in</strong>g transport<br />

Tomato<br />

Cauliflower<br />

Grapes<br />

Nectar<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Red pepper<br />

(capsicum)<br />

Grapes<br />

Iceberg<br />

lettuce<br />

From <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />

(29/9/97) to Germany<br />

(29/9/97)<br />

From France (1/12/97) to<br />

Germany (4/12/97)<br />

From <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />

(19/1/98) to Germany<br />

(21/1/98)<br />

From Spa<strong>in</strong> (7/8/99) to<br />

Austria (12/8/99)<br />

From <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands<br />

(9/8/99) to Austria<br />

(12/8/99)<br />

From Greece (19/8/99) to<br />

Germany (24/8/99)<br />

From Spa<strong>in</strong> (18/10/99) to<br />

Sweden (22/10/99)<br />

Double wall ‘E’/’B’ flute<br />

Kraft outer l<strong>in</strong>er, Recycled Inner l<strong>in</strong>er<br />

Double wall ‘B’/’C’ flute<br />

Kraft outer l<strong>in</strong>er, semi-chemical flut<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

recycled middle l<strong>in</strong>er, Kraft <strong>in</strong>ner l<strong>in</strong>er<br />

Double wall ‘E’/’B’ flute<br />

Kraft outer l<strong>in</strong>er, recycled flut<strong>in</strong>g and middle<br />

l<strong>in</strong>er, Kraft <strong>in</strong>ner l<strong>in</strong>er<br />

Polyethylene bags for each branch of grapes<br />

Double wall ‘B’/’C’ flute<br />

White top Kraft outer l<strong>in</strong>er, semi-chemical<br />

flut<strong>in</strong>g, Kraft middle l<strong>in</strong>er, semi-chemical<br />

flut<strong>in</strong>g, Kraft Inner l<strong>in</strong>er<br />

Double wall ‘E’/’B’ flute<br />

Kraft outer l<strong>in</strong>er, recycled flut<strong>in</strong>g, recycled<br />

middle l<strong>in</strong>er, recycled flut<strong>in</strong>g, Kraft <strong>in</strong>ner<br />

l<strong>in</strong>er<br />

Double wall ‘E’/’B’ flute<br />

White top Kraft outer l<strong>in</strong>er, semi-chemical<br />

flut<strong>in</strong>g, recycled middle l<strong>in</strong>er, semi-chemical<br />

flut<strong>in</strong>g, kraft <strong>in</strong>ner l<strong>in</strong>er<br />

Double wall ‘B’/’C’ flute<br />

White top Kraft outer l<strong>in</strong>er, semi-chemical<br />

flut<strong>in</strong>g, recycled middle l<strong>in</strong>er, recycled<br />

flut<strong>in</strong>g, recycled <strong>in</strong>ner l<strong>in</strong>er<br />

Wooden pallets 1200x800 mm<br />

10 boxes to a layer,<br />

15 layers high<br />

Wooden pallets 1200x800 mm<br />

4 boxes to a layer,<br />

11 layers high<br />

Wooden pallets 1200x800 mm<br />

8 boxes to a layer,<br />

14 layers high<br />

Wooden pallets 1200x800 mm<br />

4 boxes to a layer,<br />

21 layers high<br />

Wooden pallets 1200x800 mm<br />

8 boxes to a layer,<br />

15 or 16 layers high<br />

Wooden pallets, 1200x800mm<br />

8 boxes per layer,<br />

16 trays high<br />

Wooden pallet, 1200 x 800 mm<br />

4 boxes per layer,<br />

14 layers high<br />

Temperature: 10 – 20 ºC<br />

Humidity: 70 – 90% r.h.<br />

Composition load: mixed<br />

Temperature: 5 – 17 ºC<br />

Humidity: 55 – 95% r.h.<br />

Composition load: mixed<br />

Temperature: 5 – 11 ºC<br />

Humidity: 60 – 84% r.h.<br />

Composition load: mixed<br />

Temperature: 2,5 ºC<br />

Humidity: 70% r.h.<br />

Composition load: mixed<br />

Temperature: 9 – 16 ºC<br />

Humidity: 65 – 80% r.h.<br />

Composition load: mixed<br />

Temperature: 6 ºC<br />

Humidity: 85% r.h.<br />

Composition load: mixed<br />

Temperature: 5 ºC<br />

Humidity: 85 % r.h.<br />

Composition load: mixed<br />

3


TNO report<br />

BU2.00/011957-1/KC<br />

<strong>Product</strong> <strong>protection</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong><br />

3. Results<br />

In this chapter <strong>the</strong> results of <strong>the</strong> study, found by <strong>the</strong> research partners are given.<br />

3.1 Chemical aspects<br />

Chemical analysis has as objective to clear up <strong>the</strong> risk to product and humans from impact of contam<strong>in</strong>ants.<br />

This is done by screen<strong>in</strong>g for unknown contam<strong>in</strong>ants and analysis of selected contam<strong>in</strong>ants (e.g. PCP, PCB,<br />

heavy metals, pesticides, and diox<strong>in</strong>s). Headspace and Tenax measurements of <strong>the</strong> corrugated board<br />

samples showed no detectable amounts of halogenated anisols and phenols. Some aldehydes (hexanal,<br />

nonanal) could be identified. DIPN and some phthalates were also seen as ma<strong>in</strong> components <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

screen<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Table 2: Heavy metals, PCB, PCP, Diox<strong>in</strong>s and furans<br />

Component Tomato Cauli<br />

Flower<br />

Heavy metals as aqueous extracts<br />

All values <strong>in</strong> mg/kg paper<br />

Chromium<br />

(Total Cr)<br />

Grapes<br />

1<br />

Nectar<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Red<br />

pepper<br />

Grapes<br />

2<br />

0.027 0.001 0.017 0.001 0.008 n.d.<br />


TNO report<br />

BU2.00/011957-1/KC<br />

<strong>Product</strong> <strong>protection</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong><br />

Component Tomato Cauli Grapes Nectar<strong>in</strong>e Red Grapes Iceberg Requirement<br />

flower 1<br />

pepper 2 lettuce<br />

1234678- 8.3 6.0 9.2 3.9 10.7 1.6 4.0 -<br />

HpCDF<br />

1234789- 0.7 1.4 2.9 < 0.08 < 0.19 1.15 < 0.3 -<br />

HpCDF<br />

OCDF 30 14.0 65 15.3 12.1 4.5 13.1 -<br />

I-Teq (<strong>in</strong>cl. ½<br />

det. limit)<br />

3.2 2.1 6.5 1.5 2.1 1.3 2.3 -<br />

I-Teq 3.1 2.1 5.7 1.5 1.7 1.2 2.2 -<br />

n.d.: not detected<br />

I-Teq: International Toxic Equivalents accord<strong>in</strong>g to NATO/CCMS<br />

Table 3: Phthalates, Chloroanisoles and DIPN<br />

Component Tomato Cauli<br />

Flower<br />

Grapes<br />

1<br />

Phthalates<br />

All values <strong>in</strong> mg/kg paper<br />

Diethylphthalate<br />

Diallylphthalate<br />

Dipropylphthalate<br />

Diisobutylphthalate<br />

Dibutylphthalate<br />

Benzylbutylphthalate<br />

Bis(2-ethyl)<br />

hexylphthalate<br />

Nectar<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Red<br />

pepper<br />

Grapes<br />

2<br />

Iceberg<br />

lettuce<br />

0.5 0.1 0.5 0.4. 0.4 0.1 0.8 -<br />

0.1 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. -<br />

n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. -<br />

52.1 23.6 46.5 18.1 42.3 11.9. 24.6 -<br />

26.1 11.5 19.4 13.8 13.1 14.4 15.5 -<br />

3.3 1.0 2.4 1.9 1.8 2.6 1.1 -<br />

11.8 4.0 7.6 7.9 8.1 2.4 4.8 -<br />

2.3 2.2 0.4 0.5. n.d. n.d. 0.3 -<br />

n.d. 2.0 n.d. n.d. n.d. 0.3 n.d. -<br />

Requirement<br />

DIPN <strong>in</strong><br />

mg/kg paper<br />

12.5 6.7 11.5 34.6 39.5 4.0 26.6 -<br />

Anisoles <strong>in</strong><br />

mg/kg paper<br />

Dicyclohexylphthalate<br />

Diphenylphthalate<br />

2,4,6-Trichloroanisole<br />

2,3,4-Trichloroanisole<br />

2,3,4,5-Tetrachloroanisole<br />

n.d.: not detected<br />

n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. -<br />

n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. -<br />

n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. -<br />

5


TNO report<br />

BU2.00/011957-1/KC<br />

<strong>Product</strong> <strong>protection</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong><br />

Table 4: Pesticides (all values <strong>in</strong> mg/kg paper)<br />

Component Tomato Cauli<br />

flower<br />

Grapes<br />

1<br />

Nectar<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Red<br />

pepper<br />

Grapes<br />

2<br />

Iceberg<br />

lettuce<br />

Brompropylate n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. -<br />

Captane n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. -<br />

Chlorfen-v<strong>in</strong>phos n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. -<br />

Chlorpyrifos (- n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. -<br />

ethyl)<br />

Chlorthalonil n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. -<br />

Cypermethr<strong>in</strong>e<br />

<strong>in</strong>cl. Alphamethr<strong>in</strong>e<br />

n.d. 0.04 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. -<br />

Diaz<strong>in</strong>one n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. -<br />

Dicofol <strong>in</strong>cl.<br />

Degradation<br />

products<br />

n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. -<br />

Dimethoate n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. -<br />

α-Endosulfane n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. -<br />

β-Endosulfane n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. -<br />

Fenitrothione n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. -<br />

Folpet n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. -<br />

Iprodione n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. -<br />

γ-HCH (L<strong>in</strong>dane) n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. 0.02 -<br />

Malathione n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. -<br />

Methidathione n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. -<br />

o-Phenylphenol n.a. n.a. n.a. 0.12 0.16 0.02 0.11 -<br />

Parathione(-<br />

ethyl)<br />

n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. -<br />

Parathionemethyl<br />

n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. -<br />

Procymidone n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. -<br />

Pyrazophos n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. -<br />

Tetradifone n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. -<br />

Triadimefone n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. -<br />

V<strong>in</strong>clozol<strong>in</strong> n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. -<br />

Thiabendazol n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. -<br />

Benomyl,<br />

n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. -<br />

Carbendazim,<br />

Thiophanat -<br />

methyl as<br />

Carbendazim<br />

n.d. (not detected)<br />

n.a. (not analysed)<br />

* Requirements accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> “Draft Council of Europe resolution on paper and board used <strong>in</strong> food contact<br />

applications”, May 22, 1998.<br />

Requirement<br />

6


TNO report<br />

BU2.00/011957-1/KC<br />

<strong>Product</strong> <strong>protection</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong><br />

3.2 Microbiology<br />

Microbiological analysis delivers <strong>the</strong> numbers and type of micro-organisms to f<strong>in</strong>d out <strong>the</strong> risk to product<br />

(spoilage organisms) and risk to humans (pathogens). They look at microbial load, identification and<br />

transfer routes. The work recorded changes <strong>in</strong> microbial composition as well as <strong>the</strong> microbiological load<br />

from foodstuffs and corrugated boxes dur<strong>in</strong>g transportation and storage. To do this, new scientific<br />

approaches were developed such as ribopr<strong>in</strong>ter analysis (genetic characterisation) of stra<strong>in</strong>s for<br />

identification, toge<strong>the</strong>r with traditional state of <strong>the</strong> art tests.<br />

Table 5: Quantification of micro-organisms, product (P) and box (B), estimated with NMKL-method;<br />

Total aerobic bacteria <strong>in</strong> log CFU/gram; Detection limit: log 2 CFU/gram<br />

Total<br />

aerobic<br />

Tomato Cauli<br />

Flower<br />

Grapes 1 Nectar<strong>in</strong>e Red<br />

pepper<br />

Grapes 2 Iceberg<br />

lettuce<br />

bacteria P B B B P B P B P B P B P B<br />

Packer 4.3 3.1 5.4 n.d n.d n.d 4.3 3.6 4.4 3.6 3.0 3.8 6.1 5.1<br />

Unpacker 3.9 3.4 5.9 n.d n.d n.d 4.5 4.1 4.3 3.6 3.3 4.2 6.7 4.9<br />

n.d.: not detected<br />

Table 6: Quantification of total aerobic spore formers for product (P) and box (B), estimated with NMKL-method;<br />

Total aerobic spores <strong>in</strong> log CFU/gram; Detection limit: log 2 CFU/gram<br />

Total<br />

aerobic<br />

Tomato Cauli<br />

Flower<br />

Grapes 1 Nectar<strong>in</strong>e Red<br />

pepper<br />

Grapes 2 Iceberg<br />

lettuce<br />

spores P B P B P B P B P B P B P B<br />

Packer 3.0 n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d 3.5 n.d 2.8 2.9 3.7 3.4 3.9<br />

Unpacker 2.0 n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d 3.4 n.d 3.1 2.9 2.9 3.4 3.4<br />

n.d.: not detected<br />

Table 7: Identification of dom<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g micro-organisms at packer for product (P) and box (B): methods used see annex<br />

Tomato Cauli Grapes Nectar<strong>in</strong>e Red Grapes 2 Iceberg<br />

Species<br />

Flower 1<br />

pepper<br />

lettuce<br />

P B P B P B P B P B P B P B<br />

Bacillus spp x x x x x x x x x x x x x x<br />

Bacillus cereus x x x x x x x x x<br />

gr***<br />

Bacillus subtilis x x x x x x x<br />

gr**<br />

Bacillus<br />

x x x x<br />

megaterium gr*<br />

Pseudomonas x x x x<br />

spp<br />

Mould spp. x x x x x x x x x x x x x x<br />

x: detected<br />

* B.megaterium gr. <strong>in</strong>cludes: B.megaterium simplex, B.megaterium.<br />

** B. subtilis gr. <strong>in</strong>cludes: B.licheniformis, B.amyloliquefaciens, B.subtilis.<br />

*** B. cereus gr. <strong>in</strong>cludes: B.thur<strong>in</strong>giensis, B.mycoides, B.cereus.<br />

Table 8: Identification of pathogens for <strong>Product</strong> (P) and Box (B); methods used see annex<br />

Tomato Cauli Grapes Nectar<strong>in</strong>e Red Grapes 2 Iceberg<br />

Species<br />

Flower 1<br />

pepper<br />

lettuce<br />

P B P B P B P B P B P B P B<br />

Salmonella n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d<br />

Listeria n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d<br />

Staphylococcus n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d<br />

E.coli n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d n.d<br />

nd: not detected<br />

7


TNO report<br />

BU2.00/011957-1/KC<br />

<strong>Product</strong> <strong>protection</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong><br />

Table 9: Air samples, Identification of dom<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g mould for packer (P) and Unpacker (U); methods used see annex<br />

Tomato Cauli<br />

Flower<br />

Grapes 1 Nectar<strong>in</strong>e Red<br />

pepper<br />

Grapes 2 Iceberg<br />

lettuce<br />

P U P U P U P U P U P U P U<br />

Penicillium x x x x x x x x x x<br />

Cladosporium x x x x x x x<br />

Trichodermium x x<br />

Rhizopus<br />

x<br />

Aspergillus x x x<br />

x: detected<br />

Results have shown no presence of pathogens like Salmonella, Listeria, Staphylococcus and E.coli <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

corrugated board boxes. The quantification (microbial load) of liv<strong>in</strong>g bacteria on corrugated board boxes is<br />

normally around 10xE3 colony form<strong>in</strong>g units per gram (cfu/g). The dom<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g bacterial flora on <strong>the</strong> boxes<br />

are aerobic spore formers of family Bacillus.spp. which can be localised both on surface and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terior<br />

of <strong>the</strong> material. Work of identification and characterisation has found Bacillus cereus, a potential pathogen,<br />

<strong>in</strong> boxes. Bacillus cereus is also found on products and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> air at packer and unpacker, why possible<br />

route of <strong>in</strong>fection is unclear. The microbial load on products such as vegetables and fruit is normally<br />

higher, from 10E3 – 10E6 cfu/g, compared to corrugated board boxes, why possible route for microbial<br />

transfer is likely to be from product to packag<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Besides Bacillus spp. ano<strong>the</strong>r target to focus on are moulds, which are able to spoil products. Moulds have<br />

been found frequently on <strong>the</strong> boxes, at levels normally around 10xE2 cfu/g. Moulds are found on surfaces<br />

of <strong>the</strong> box, which <strong>in</strong>dicates a re<strong>in</strong>fection from air, or from contact with product. The sampl<strong>in</strong>g of air (table<br />

9) and fruit and vegetables have found moulds on <strong>the</strong>se items. The most common moulds have been<br />

identified (Table 9) to groups of Trichoderma, Penicillium, Rizosporus, Cladosporium and Aspergillus.<br />

Many of <strong>the</strong>m form ascospores which normally transfer by air, why hygienic conditions dur<strong>in</strong>g storage of<br />

corrugated board boxes are important.<br />

3.3 Fitness for Purpose (mechanical aspects)<br />

Fitness for Purpose study is done to provide <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong> risk to product from mechanical damage and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

impact of mechanical damage on hygiene.<br />

Table 10: Fitness for purpose<br />

Tomato Cauli<br />

Flower<br />

Grapes<br />

1<br />

Nectar<strong>in</strong>e Red<br />

pepper<br />

Grapes<br />

2<br />

Iceberg<br />

lettuce<br />

Base belly<strong>in</strong>g cd cnpd cnpd Cnpd cnpd Cd cnpd<br />

Damage to product m/+ m/+ m m m m m<br />

Damage to packag<strong>in</strong>g - - - - - - -<br />

cnpd: belly<strong>in</strong>g occurred but caused no product damage; cd: belly<strong>in</strong>g occurred and caused m<strong>in</strong>or product damage<br />

-: none; m: m<strong>in</strong>or (unlikely to affect purchase decision); m/+: mostly m<strong>in</strong>or damage, but with some major<br />

+: major (likely to affect purchase decision)<br />

3.4 Sensory results<br />

Sensory analysis has as objective to f<strong>in</strong>d out <strong>the</strong> risk to product <strong>in</strong> terms of smell, ta<strong>in</strong>t, taste and<br />

appearance. This is done by a consumer reference test: food product rank<strong>in</strong>g accord<strong>in</strong>g to preference by a<br />

consumer panel.<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> performance of <strong>the</strong> study it was learned that <strong>the</strong> set-up of <strong>the</strong> study caused problems with <strong>the</strong><br />

condition<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> samples. This had negative effect on <strong>the</strong> reliability of <strong>the</strong> results for sensory analysis. It<br />

was decided not to cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>the</strong>se measurements after three attempts.<br />

Table 11: Sensory results<br />

Tomato Cauliflower Grapes 1<br />

Impact non Non Non, product itself was ta<strong>in</strong>ted, most likely with a preservative<br />

8


TNO report<br />

BU2.00/011957-1/KC<br />

<strong>Product</strong> <strong>protection</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong><br />

4. Conclusions<br />

<strong>Product</strong> Path Comb<strong>in</strong>ations studied cover <strong>the</strong> whole range of general applications of corrugated board <strong>in</strong><br />

terms of transport conditions, distances and types of packed products.<br />

The risk to <strong>the</strong> packed product or to human health depends on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>teraction between:<br />

• <strong>the</strong> packag<strong>in</strong>g system<br />

• <strong>the</strong> packed product<br />

• <strong>the</strong> distribution system<br />

• <strong>the</strong> hygienic handl<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• <strong>the</strong> environment<br />

Chemical aspects:<br />

• No or very low levels of halogenated anisols or lower chlor<strong>in</strong>ated phenols were found<br />

• DIPN and some phthalates were found <strong>in</strong> ppm levels<br />

• Levels of PCBs were below <strong>the</strong> detection limit<br />

• Levels of PCP and <strong>the</strong> diox<strong>in</strong> toxic equivalents were very low<br />

• No or low levels of heavy metals and pesticides were found<br />

• All values below <strong>the</strong> limits accepted today<br />

⇒ From <strong>the</strong> results obta<strong>in</strong>ed for <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>vestigated 7 samples no risk for human health can be seen with<br />

respect to possible migration of <strong>the</strong> measured chemical substances from <strong>the</strong> corrugated board boxes to<br />

<strong>the</strong> conta<strong>in</strong>ed fruit and vegetable products.<br />

Microbiology:<br />

• No pathogens (Salmonella, Listeria, Staphylococcus or E.coli) except Bacillus cereus (potential<br />

pathogen)<br />

• Bacillus cereus was found throughout transportation system; air, product and corrugated board box.<br />

• Quality of <strong>the</strong> product was not affected by <strong>the</strong> corrugated board box<br />

• The environment (air) was sometimes found to have a high load of micro-organisms (ma<strong>in</strong>ly moulds<br />

but also Bacillus species), which can have an effect on both product and packag<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The microbiological quality of corrugated board boxes depends on <strong>the</strong> quality of <strong>the</strong> distribution system<br />

and <strong>the</strong> hygienic handl<strong>in</strong>g. It is of critical importance to food handlers to have a good hygiene and to be<br />

aware of likely routes of transmissions of micro -organisms.<br />

⇒ No <strong>in</strong>dications of any risk to product or human health from <strong>the</strong> corrugated packag<strong>in</strong>g system.<br />

Fitness for Purpose:<br />

• Dur<strong>in</strong>g fitness for purpose evaluation corrugated packag<strong>in</strong>g assessed performed well<br />

• There was a small <strong>in</strong>cidence of m<strong>in</strong>or product damage dur<strong>in</strong>g test<strong>in</strong>g (as would be expected for<br />

distribution of fresh products), but <strong>the</strong> damage witnessed is considered unlikely to effect customer<br />

purchase decisions.<br />

• Dur<strong>in</strong>g evaluation <strong>the</strong>re were <strong>in</strong>cidences of more significant damage, but <strong>the</strong> overall occurrence of this<br />

was very low <strong>in</strong>deed.<br />

• Tray base belly<strong>in</strong>g was found to be a potential product damage mechanism<br />

⇒ All corrugated packag<strong>in</strong>g assessed exhibited fitness for purpose<br />

Sensory aspects:<br />

The results of <strong>the</strong> sensory analysis showed very little impact. Organoleptic changes are <strong>in</strong>duced by<br />

microbial or chemical contam<strong>in</strong>ation, or by mechanical damage or by too long storage time. A good<br />

packag<strong>in</strong>g solution will help to keep organoleptic characteristics of <strong>the</strong> foodstuff unchanged.<br />

Overall conclusion<br />

Corrugated board is fit for its purpose, it performs well. Even <strong>in</strong> worst case corrugated packag<strong>in</strong>g is with<strong>in</strong><br />

limits accepted today.<br />

9


TNO report<br />

BU2.00/011957-1/KC<br />

<strong>Product</strong> <strong>protection</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong><br />

ANNEX<br />

Methods Chemical analysis:<br />

Analysis for heavy metals<br />

Cold water extract accord<strong>in</strong>g to EN 12498 resp. EN 12497. Analysis with AAS for Cr, Cd, Pb with graphite<br />

furnace technique, mercury was analysed with ICP/MS.<br />

Analysis for Pesticides<br />

Extraction was done with addition of <strong>in</strong>ternal standards <strong>in</strong> a soxhlet apparatus. Cleanup for an aliquot was<br />

done by gelpermeation chromatography (GPC) and a silica column. The gaschromatographic analysis of<br />

<strong>the</strong> fractions was done with GC/ECD resp. GC/NPD. The verification of <strong>the</strong> results was done by<br />

HRGC/LRMS.<br />

Analysis method for carbamates (Benomyl, Carbendazim, Thiophanate) and Thiabendazol:<br />

Aliquots were used for methanol extraction. The extracts were transfered <strong>in</strong>to Dimethylformamid. The<br />

carbamates were converted accord<strong>in</strong>g to DFG-method 261 to carbendazim. A cleanup was done with<br />

modified silicagel. HPLC-analyses were done with a fluorescence detector resp. a diode array detector<br />

(HPLC/DAD).<br />

Screen<strong>in</strong>g analysis for organic compounds<br />

Headspace measurements, cold extraction with ethanol over 24h at room temperature or Tenax extraction<br />

over 2h at 60° were done. Extracts were evaporated to dryness and reeluted with n-hexane. GC/MS scan<br />

measurements were done for <strong>the</strong> samples.<br />

Analysis for halogenated phenols <strong>in</strong>cl. PCP and PCB<br />

ASE or soxhlet extraction with dichloromethane were done under addition of <strong>in</strong>ternal standards. For <strong>the</strong><br />

phenolic compounds an aliqot was derivated with acetic acid anhydride under addition of potassium<br />

carbonate. After a chromatographic sample cleanup analyses with GC/MS <strong>in</strong> SIM mode were done.<br />

Analysis for DIPN, anisols and phthalates<br />

ASE extraction with dichloromethane with use of deuterated <strong>in</strong>ternal standards. Analysis with GC/MS <strong>in</strong><br />

SIM mode.<br />

Diox<strong>in</strong> analysis<br />

Before soxhlet or ASE extraction an <strong>in</strong>ternal isotope labelled standard was added. The multistep cleanup<br />

procedure <strong>in</strong>cluded a mixed column and a superactive basic alum<strong>in</strong>a column. All samples were analysed by<br />

HRGC-HRMS.<br />

Methods Microbiology:<br />

1. NMKL-method (quantitative) – log CFU bacteria/gram sample. Detection or not detection of Total<br />

aerobic bacteria, Total anaerobic bacteria, Total aerobic spores, Total anaerobic spores, Coagulase positive<br />

Staphylococcus spp., E.coli, Yeast, Mould.<br />

2. NMKL-method (qualitative) – Detection or not detection of Listeria spp., Salmonella spp.<br />

3. DIN-method (quantitative) – CFU/100 cm2 sample. Detection or not detectection of Total aerobic<br />

bacteria, Yeast and Mould on corrugated board and paper.<br />

4. Swab-test (qualitative) a surface method. Detection or not detection of Total aerobic bacteria, Total<br />

anaerobic bacteria, Total aerobic spores, Total anaerobic spores, Coagulase positive Staphylococcus spp.,<br />

E.coli, Yeast and Mould.<br />

5. Contact method (quantitative) a surface method. Detection of light, moderate or heavy growth. Detection<br />

of Total aerobic bacteria, Yeast, Mould and E.coli.<br />

6. Air-samples (quantitative) was taken with a Micro-Bio- Air sampler.<br />

7. Microscopy a method used for Mould identification.<br />

8. API 50 CHB- A chemical based test kit for identification of Bacillus stra<strong>in</strong>s.<br />

9. Ribopr<strong>in</strong>ter- An automatic ribotyp<strong>in</strong>g method that analyses a certa<strong>in</strong> type of DNA (ribosomal RNA),<br />

used for stra<strong>in</strong> characterisation.<br />

10


TNO report<br />

BU2.00/011957-1/KC<br />

<strong>Product</strong> <strong>protection</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Supply</strong> cha<strong>in</strong><br />

Culture medium and <strong>in</strong>cubation temperature/time<br />

TGE-agar, Tryptone-Glucose-Extract-Agar 30C, 3 days, Total aerobic bacteria<br />

TGE-agar, Tryptone-Glucose-Extract-Agar 30C, 3 days, Total aerobic spores<br />

BA-agar, Blood Agar 37C, 2 days, Total anaerobic bacteria <strong>in</strong> anaerobic<br />

condition<br />

BA-agar, Blood-Agar 37C, 2 days, Total anaerobic spores <strong>in</strong> anaerobic<br />

condition.<br />

SAB-agar, Sabourand-1% glucose, 1% maltose 30C, 3-5 days,Yeast and Mould<br />

DRBC-agar, Dichloran-Rosbengal-Cloramfenikol 30C, 3-5 days Yeast and Mould<br />

BPA-agar, Baird-Parker´s 37C, 2 days Coagulase positive Staphylococcus spp.<br />

VRGB-agar, Violet-Red-Bile-Glucose 44C, 1 day E.coli<br />

NB, nutrition broth 30C, 1 day pre-enrichment broth, total aerobic and<br />

anaerobic spores<br />

LB I, Listeria broth 30C, 1 day pre-enrichment broth, Listeria spp.<br />

LB II, Listeria broth 30C, 1 day enrichment broth, Listeria spp.<br />

Oxford Agar 37C, 2 days Listeria spp.<br />

Buffered peptone water 37C, 1 day pre-enrichment broth, Salmonella spp.<br />

RV, Pappaport-Vassiliadis broth 42C, 1 day enrichment broth, Salmonella spp.<br />

XLD, Xylose-Lys<strong>in</strong>e-Desoxycholate Agar 37C, 1 day Salmonella spp.<br />

TSI, Triple -Sugar-Iron Agar 37C, 1 day Salmonella spp.<br />

Qualitative<br />

10 swabs<br />

4 total counts<br />

6 pathogens<br />

Identification<br />

API<br />

Characterisation<br />

Ribopr<strong>in</strong>ter<br />

1)<br />

product<br />

Quantitative<br />

6 contact<br />

2 total count<br />

2 enterobacteriace<br />

2 moulds + yeast<br />

1 NMKL<br />

Qual. + Quant.<br />

1 aerobic spores/bact<br />

1 anaerobic spores/bact<br />

1 mould + yeast<br />

5 pathogens<br />

2)<br />

Corrugated<br />

board boxes<br />

3)<br />

air<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!