You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
HERE BE DRAGONS<br />
ration of Mars will require the return of samples to Earth rather than<br />
analysis on Mars, and NASA has made plans accordingly. There's a<br />
mission planned for the year 2003 that will collect samples with a<br />
rover. The rover will deliver the samples to a lander, which will fire<br />
them into orbit. Another mission in 2006 will do the same thing<br />
somewhere else on Mars. Then a French-built sample return vehicle,<br />
launched in 2006, will rendezvous with one or both of the orbiting<br />
caches and return them to Earth by 2008.<br />
We ask McKay why we should be going to Mars for rocks when<br />
Mars has already sent us a bunch. "All the Martian meteorites come<br />
from volcanic terrains," he says. "That's maybe because only volcanic<br />
rocks have enough integrity that when they're hit by a comet they stay<br />
intact and launch off into space. A block of sandstone would just turn<br />
to sand, and it will never make it. But volcanic rocks are not ideal for<br />
searching for fossils. If you wanted to find fossils on Earth, landing on<br />
Kilauea and taking samples would not be the ideal way. It would be<br />
better to land on the Bonneville salt flats and take a sedimentary core."<br />
On Earth, 3.5-billion-year-old fossils, such as Bill Schopf has found,<br />
are extremely rare. But that's in large part because 3.5-billion-year-old<br />
rocks are themselves rare, thanks to the constant recycling of the<br />
Earth's lithosphere. In addition, when such rocks are found, they usually<br />
turn out to have been altered by exposure to high temperature and<br />
pressure within the Earth. "On Mars there's no tectonics or mountain<br />
building or erosion," McKay reminds us. "We can see surfaces that are<br />
3.8 billion years old—half the planet is that old. That doesn't mean<br />
that it's going to be easy to find fossils, of course. It may be hard in a<br />
different way."<br />
If fossil microorganisms are found, that would still leave unresolved<br />
the question of whether they belonged to an independent Life, or were<br />
cousins to Schopf s terrestrial microbes. "We need the organic bodies,"<br />
says McKay. To get them, he thinks, the most promising strategy<br />
would be to drill about a kilometer into the ancient permafrost surrounding<br />
the south polar cap. The idea would not be to get all the way<br />
down to liquid water but to find ancient frozen sediments that could<br />
harbor the remains of organisms dating from a more clement era.<br />
"They'd be dead," he says, "but we'd be able to see if they used the<br />
same twenty left-handed amino acids as we do, and DNA, and compare<br />
it to Woese's tree of life." With the DNA, of course, one would be<br />
halfway to a "Noachian Park." But given all the trouble that cloning dinosaurs<br />
led to, NASA may think twice about cloning Martians.<br />
82