Download - Bangalore Branch of SIRC
Download - Bangalore Branch of SIRC
Download - Bangalore Branch of SIRC
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
8/23/2011<br />
ISSUES IN TAX AUDIT U/S. 44AB AND U/S. 44AD<br />
AND CLAUSE TO CLAUSE ANALYSIS OF FORM<br />
NO 3CD<br />
CA NAVEEN KHARIWAL G.<br />
B.COM,FCA<br />
9880683725<br />
Finance Act, 1984<br />
Hon. Finance Minister:<br />
“Tax Audit intended to ensure that the books<br />
<strong>of</strong> account and other records are properly<br />
maintained and faithfully reflect the true<br />
income <strong>of</strong> the taxpayer”<br />
1
8/23/2011<br />
Circular No. 387 dt 06-07-1984<br />
A proper audit for tax purposes would ensure:<br />
That books <strong>of</strong> accounts and other records are<br />
properly maintained<br />
That they faithfully reflect the income <strong>of</strong> the taxpayer<br />
Claims <strong>of</strong> deductions are correctly made by him<br />
Circular No. 387 dt 06-07-1984<br />
Such audit would also help in checking<br />
practices<br />
fraudulent<br />
Facilitate administration <strong>of</strong> tax laws by proper presentation<br />
<strong>of</strong> accounts<br />
Considerable saving <strong>of</strong> time <strong>of</strong> the AO in carrying out<br />
routine verifications<br />
Checking correctness <strong>of</strong> totals and verifying<br />
purchase and sales are properly vouched<br />
whether<br />
2
8/23/2011<br />
[Audit <strong>of</strong> accounts <strong>of</strong> certain persons carrying on business or<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ession.<br />
44AB. Every person,—<br />
(a)<br />
carrying on business shall, if his total sales, turnover or gross<br />
receipts, as the case may be, in business exceed or exceeds 6<br />
[sixty lakh rupees] in any previous year; or<br />
(b)<br />
carrying on pr<strong>of</strong>ession shall, if his gross receipts in pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />
exceed 8 [fifteen lakh rupees] in any [previous year; or<br />
(c) carrying on the business shall, if the pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains from the<br />
business are deemed to be the pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains <strong>of</strong> such person<br />
under [section 44AE ] [or section 44BB or section 44BBB], as<br />
the case may be, and he has claimed his income to be lower than<br />
the pr<strong>of</strong>its or gains so deemed to be the pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains <strong>of</strong> his<br />
business, as the case may be, in any [previous year; or]]<br />
(d) carrying on the business shall, if the pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains from the<br />
business are deemed to be the pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains <strong>of</strong> such person<br />
under section 44AD and he has claimed such income to be lower<br />
than the pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains so deemed to be the pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains<br />
<strong>of</strong> his business and his income exceeds the maximum amount<br />
which is not chargeable to income-tax in any previous year,]<br />
3
8/23/2011<br />
get his accounts <strong>of</strong> such previous year audited by an accountant<br />
before the specified date and [furnish by] that date the report <strong>of</strong><br />
such audit in the prescribed form duly signed and verified by<br />
such accountant and setting forth such particulars as may be<br />
prescribed :<br />
Provided further that] in a case where such person is required by<br />
or under any other law to get his accounts audited, it shall be<br />
sufficient compliance with the provisions <strong>of</strong> this section if such<br />
person gets the accounts <strong>of</strong> such business or pr<strong>of</strong>ession audited<br />
under such law before the specified date and [furnishes by] that<br />
date the report <strong>of</strong> the audit as required under such other law and a<br />
further report [by an accountant] in the form prescribed under<br />
this section.<br />
Explanation.—For the purposes <strong>of</strong> this section,—<br />
(i) ―accountant‖ shall have the same meaning as in the<br />
Explanation below sub-section (2) <strong>of</strong> section 288;<br />
[(ii) ―specified date‖, in relation to the accounts <strong>of</strong> the assessee<br />
<strong>of</strong> the previous year relevant to an assessment year, means the<br />
[30th day <strong>of</strong> September] <strong>of</strong> the assessment year.]]<br />
4
8/23/2011<br />
Liability <strong>of</strong> Tax Audit<br />
A charitable trust , cooperative society etc., though their<br />
income may be exempt, even if turnover exceed the<br />
threshold limit, they should get their account audited.<br />
If income <strong>of</strong> an assessee is below the taxable limit, he will<br />
also liable to get his account audited, if the turnover in<br />
business exceed the threshold limit.<br />
Section 44AB not applicable to assessee covered us 44B<br />
and 44BBA.<br />
‣ A non-resident is also required to get his accounts<br />
audited and to furnish report under sec 44AB, but<br />
only pertaining to Indian operations.<br />
‣ An agriculturist is not required to get his accounts<br />
audited u/s 44AB even though the total sales <strong>of</strong><br />
agricultural products may exceed Rs 60 lakhs.<br />
5
8/23/2011<br />
Total Sales, Turnover or Gross Receipts<br />
‣Not defined in Sec. 44AB or any other provision <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Act.<br />
‣Can be interpreted as volume <strong>of</strong> business, total is for all<br />
three expressions.<br />
‣Sale denotes sale <strong>of</strong> movable commodity.<br />
‣Turnover is aggregate amount for which sales effected<br />
or services rendered (as per guidance note <strong>of</strong> ICAI).<br />
‣Gross receipt to include all receipts whether in cash or<br />
kind from carrying <strong>of</strong> business.<br />
‣Sales, turnover & gross receipts should be determined<br />
as per method <strong>of</strong> accounting regularly employed.<br />
ISSUE NO. 1 whether the sales by commission agent or by<br />
person on consignment basis forms part <strong>of</strong> turnover<br />
The position that emerges from ICAI‘s Guidance Note and CBDT‘s<br />
Circular No. 452, dated 17.03.1986 is as under:<br />
If the property in the goods or all significant risks and rewards <strong>of</strong><br />
ownership <strong>of</strong> goods belongs to the commission agent or consignee<br />
immediately before the transfer by him to a third party, then the sales<br />
price received / receivable by the commission agent or consignee shall<br />
form part <strong>of</strong> his sales / turnover.<br />
If the property in the goods or all significant risks and rewards <strong>of</strong><br />
ownership in the goods continue to remain with the principal<br />
(consignor) immediately before the transfer by him, (the commission<br />
agent or consignee) to a third party, then the sales price received /<br />
receivable by the commission agent or consignee shall not form part<br />
<strong>of</strong> the sales / turnover <strong>of</strong> the commission agent or consignee. The sales<br />
price received / receivable by him shall form part <strong>of</strong> the sales /<br />
turnover <strong>of</strong> the principal (consignor).<br />
6
8/23/2011<br />
ISSUE NO. 2 In case <strong>of</strong> share brokers<br />
Share brokers, on purchasing securities on behalf <strong>of</strong> their customers,<br />
do not get them transferred in their names but deliver them to the<br />
customers who get them transferred in their names.<br />
The same is true in case <strong>of</strong> sales also.<br />
The share broker holds the delivery merely on behalf <strong>of</strong> his<br />
customer.<br />
The property in goods does not get transferred to the share brokers.<br />
Only brokerage which is being accounted for in the books <strong>of</strong> account<br />
<strong>of</strong> share brokers should be taken into account for considering the<br />
limits for the purpose <strong>of</strong> section 44AB.<br />
However, in case <strong>of</strong> transactions entered into by share broker on his<br />
personal account, the sale value should also be taken into account for<br />
considering the limit for the purpose <strong>of</strong> section 44AB.<br />
The case <strong>of</strong> a sub-broker is same as that <strong>of</strong> a share broker.<br />
Issue No. 3 - Speculation Transaction 43(5)<br />
It means a transaction, in which a contract for the<br />
purchase or sale <strong>of</strong> any commodity, including stocks<br />
and shares, is periodically or ultimately settled<br />
otherwise than by the actual delivery or transfer <strong>of</strong> the<br />
commodity or scrips.<br />
Thus, in a speculative transaction, the contract for<br />
sale or purchase which is entered into is not<br />
completed by giving or receiving delivery so as to<br />
result in the sale as per value <strong>of</strong> contract note.<br />
7
8/23/2011<br />
The contract is settled otherwise and squared up by<br />
paying out the difference which may be positive or<br />
negative.<br />
As such, in such transaction the difference amount is<br />
'turnover'.<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> an assessee doing speculative<br />
transactions there can be both positive and negative<br />
differences arising by settlement <strong>of</strong> various such<br />
contracts during the year.<br />
Each transaction resulting into whether a positive or<br />
negative difference is an independent transaction.<br />
Further, amount paid on account <strong>of</strong> negative<br />
difference paid is not related to the amount received<br />
on account <strong>of</strong> positive difference.<br />
In such transactions though the contract notes are issued<br />
for full value <strong>of</strong> the purchased or sold asset the entries in<br />
the books <strong>of</strong> account are made only for the differences.<br />
Accordingly, the aggregate <strong>of</strong> both positive and negative<br />
differences is to be considered as the turnover <strong>of</strong> such<br />
transactions for determining the liability to audit vide<br />
section 44AB.<br />
8
8/23/2011<br />
Issue No. 4 - Derivatives, futures and options:<br />
Such transactions are completed without the delivery <strong>of</strong><br />
shares or securities.<br />
These are also squared up by payment <strong>of</strong> differences.<br />
The contract notes are issued for the full value <strong>of</strong> the<br />
asset purchased or sold but entries in the books <strong>of</strong><br />
account are made only for the differences.<br />
The transactions may be squared up any time on or<br />
before the striking date. The buyer <strong>of</strong> the option pays the<br />
premia.<br />
(I)<br />
(II)<br />
(III)<br />
The turnover in such types <strong>of</strong> transactions is to be<br />
determined as follows:<br />
The total <strong>of</strong> favourable and unfavourable differences<br />
shall be taken as turnover.<br />
Premium received on sale <strong>of</strong> options is also to be<br />
included in turnover.<br />
In respect <strong>of</strong> any reverse trades entered, the<br />
difference thereon, should also form part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
turnover.<br />
9
8/23/2011<br />
Issue No. 5 - Delivery based transactions: Where the<br />
transaction for the purchase or sale <strong>of</strong> any commodity<br />
including stocks and shares is delivery based whether<br />
intended or by default, the total value <strong>of</strong> the sales is to be<br />
considered as turnover.<br />
Issue No. 6 - Capital Gains Vs. Business<br />
CBDT‘s Instruction No. 1827 dated 31.08.1989 r.w. Circular<br />
No. 4/2007, dated 15.06.2007.<br />
Depends on facts and circumstances <strong>of</strong> each case taking into<br />
consideration nature, frequency and volume <strong>of</strong> transaction.<br />
Landmark Judgments :<br />
i. CIT v. P.K.N. and Co. Ltd. (1966) 60 ITR 65 (SC).<br />
ii. Saroj Kumar Mazumdar v. CIT (1959) 37 ITR 242 (SC).<br />
iii. CIT v. Sutlej Cotton Mills Supply Agency (1975) 100 ITR 706<br />
(SC).<br />
iv.<br />
CIT (Central), Cal Vs. Associated Industrial Development<br />
Co.(P.) Ltd. [1971] 82 ITR 586 (SC).<br />
v. Venkataswami Naidu & Co.(G) v. CIT (1959) 35 ITR 594<br />
(SC).<br />
10
8/23/2011<br />
The Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR) (288 ITR 641), referring to<br />
the decisions <strong>of</strong> the Supreme Court in Several Cases, has culled out the<br />
following principles:-<br />
(i)<br />
(ii)<br />
―Where a company purchase and sells shares, it must be shown that<br />
they were held as stock-in-trade and that existence <strong>of</strong> the power to<br />
purchase and sell shares in the memorandum <strong>of</strong> association is not<br />
decisive <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> transaction;<br />
The substantial nature <strong>of</strong> transactions, the manner <strong>of</strong> maintaining<br />
books <strong>of</strong> account, the magnitude <strong>of</strong> purchases and sales and the ratio<br />
between purchases and sales and the holding would furnish a good<br />
guide to determine the nature <strong>of</strong> transactions;<br />
(iii) Ordinarily the purchase and sale <strong>of</strong> shares with the motive <strong>of</strong><br />
earning a pr<strong>of</strong>it, would result in the transaction being in the<br />
nature <strong>of</strong> trade / adventure in the nature <strong>of</strong> trade; but where the<br />
object <strong>of</strong> the investment is shares <strong>of</strong> a company is to derive<br />
income by way <strong>of</strong> dividend etc., then the pr<strong>of</strong>its accruing by<br />
change in such investment (by sale <strong>of</strong> shares) will yield capital<br />
gain and not revenue receipt.‖<br />
11
8/23/2011<br />
Board Circular No. 4/2007, dated 15-6-2007<br />
It is possible for tax payer to have two portfolios,<br />
i.e., an investment portfolio comprising <strong>of</strong> securities<br />
which are to be treated as capital assets and a trading<br />
portfolio comprising <strong>of</strong> stock in trade which are to<br />
be treated as trading assets. Where an assessee has<br />
two portfolios, the assessee may have income under<br />
both heads i.e., capital gains as well as business<br />
income.<br />
Issue No. 7 - The following items would not form part <strong>of</strong> "gross<br />
receipts in business” for purposes <strong>of</strong> section 44AB<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> a traveling agent, the amount received from the clients for<br />
payment to the airlines, railways etc. where such amounts are received by<br />
way <strong>of</strong> reimbursement <strong>of</strong> expenses incurred on behalf <strong>of</strong> the client. If,<br />
however, the travel agent is conducting a package tour and charges a<br />
consolidated sum for transportation, boarding and lodging and other<br />
facilities, then the amount received from the members <strong>of</strong> group tour<br />
should form part <strong>of</strong> gross receipts<br />
and<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> an advertising agent, the amount <strong>of</strong> advertising charges<br />
recovered by him from his clients provided these are by way <strong>of</strong><br />
reimbursement. But if the advertising agent books the advertisement<br />
space in bulk and recovers the charges from different clients, the amount<br />
received by him from the clients will not be the same as the charges paid<br />
by him and in such a case the amount recovered by him will form part <strong>of</strong><br />
his gross receipts.<br />
12
8/23/2011<br />
The principle to be applied is that<br />
if the assessee is merely reimbursed for certain expenses<br />
incurred, the same will not form part <strong>of</strong> his gross receipts.<br />
But in the case <strong>of</strong> charges recovered, which are not by way<br />
<strong>of</strong> reimbursement <strong>of</strong> the actual expenses incurred, they will<br />
form part <strong>of</strong> his gross receipts.<br />
Issue No. 8 - An assessee own 4 proprietorship businesses. The<br />
aggregate annual turnover <strong>of</strong> all the concerns exceeds Rs. 60<br />
lakhs but individually each business‘s turnover is below Rs. 60<br />
lakhs. Further, separate books <strong>of</strong> account are maintained for<br />
each business and pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account and balance sheet are<br />
prepared separately.<br />
(a) will tax audit under section 44AB be applicable ?<br />
(b) If yes, should the particulars <strong>of</strong> all busineses be reported in<br />
a single Form No. 3CD ? If so, how ?<br />
(c) Should the tax auditor give a consolidated Form No. 3CD in<br />
respect <strong>of</strong> all the concerns ?<br />
13
8/23/2011<br />
Ans : (a) The requirement <strong>of</strong> tax audit in the case <strong>of</strong> an<br />
assessee is to be determined taking into consideration the<br />
‗sales‘, ‗turnover‘ or ‗gross receipts‘ <strong>of</strong> all the businesses<br />
carried on by him. If the aggregate annual turnover <strong>of</strong> the<br />
four proprietary concerns exceed Rs. 60 lakhs, section<br />
44AB would be clearly applicable.<br />
(b) In regard to audit report and furnishing <strong>of</strong> particulars in<br />
Form Nos. 3CA/3CB and 3CD, there are two possibilities,<br />
Firstly, separate tax auditors may be appointed in respect <strong>of</strong><br />
individual businesses in which case Form Nos. 3CB and 3CD<br />
have to be submitted separately for each business.<br />
Alternatively, one tax auditor may undertake the audit <strong>of</strong> all the<br />
businesses. Here also the tax auditor can prepare Form Nos.<br />
3CA/ 3CB and 3CD separately for each business. The need for<br />
separate forms for each business arises particularly where<br />
reliefs are claimed in respect <strong>of</strong> individual businesses.<br />
14
8/23/2011<br />
(c) However it may be noted that tax audit as such is<br />
conducted in respect <strong>of</strong> an assessee and hence the question<br />
<strong>of</strong> consolidating the separate forms into a single form<br />
assumes importance. Further, without consolidating the<br />
separate Form Nos. 3CD into a single form particulars like<br />
deduction permissible under chapter VIA cannot be given.<br />
Hence it is advisable to prepare a consolidated form. The<br />
auditor consolidating the report / form can rely on the work<br />
<strong>of</strong> the other auditor (AAS -10) (Revised).<br />
Issue No. 9 - (i) The assessee is the proprietor <strong>of</strong> the following<br />
businesses:<br />
(a) cloth business at <strong>Bangalore</strong> – Sales Rs. 30 Lakhs.<br />
(b) yarn business at Chennai – sales Rs. 25 lakhs.<br />
(c) hosiery business at Calicut – Sales Rs. 22 lakhs.<br />
Separate sets <strong>of</strong> books are maintained at each <strong>of</strong> the above places.<br />
The business are carried on in different names viz., (a) Vinay<br />
Cloth Stores (b) Nagaraj Yarn Merchants and (c) Natesh hosiery<br />
Mart. Should the assessee get his accounts audited under section<br />
44AB in respect <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the above proprietary concerns ?<br />
15
8/23/2011<br />
(ii) If, in the above case, the hosiery business is carried on by the<br />
assessee‘s wife from the funds gifted by the assessee and the<br />
income <strong>of</strong> the business is includible in the income <strong>of</strong> the assessee<br />
under section 64, what will be te position <strong>of</strong> audit under section<br />
44AB ?<br />
(iii) If the assessee is a partner in (a) M/s. A & Co., (Sales Rs. 45<br />
lakhs) (b) M/s. B & Co., (Sales Rs. 48 lakhs) and (c) M/s. D. &<br />
Co., (Sales Rs. 40 lakhs) and he has 60% share in each <strong>of</strong> the<br />
above firms, should each <strong>of</strong> the above firms get its accounts<br />
audited under section 44AB ? Should the asseessee who is a<br />
partner in the above firms get his personal accounts audited under<br />
section 44AB as the aggregate <strong>of</strong> his share in the turnover <strong>of</strong> the<br />
three firms exceeds Rs. 60 lakhs.<br />
16
8/23/2011<br />
Ans: (i) Even if the assessee carries on business at different<br />
places in different names and deals in different commodities, it<br />
will be necessary to get the accounts audited if the aggregate<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> sales <strong>of</strong> all the businesses exceed Rs. 60 lakhs. In the<br />
given case the total sales <strong>of</strong> the three businesses amount to Rs.<br />
77 lakhs Therefore, it will be necessary to get the accounts <strong>of</strong><br />
all the three concerns belonging to this assessee audited. It may<br />
be noted that the emphasis is on the total sales. Therefore, even<br />
if the assessee carries on one or more businesses the sales <strong>of</strong> all<br />
the businesses will be taken into consideration.<br />
Ans: (ii) If the business is carried on by the wife <strong>of</strong> the<br />
assessee, it cannot be said that it is carried on by the assessee<br />
merely because the income from the business is includible in<br />
the income <strong>of</strong> the assessee under section 64. Therefore, the wife<br />
<strong>of</strong> the assessee carrying on hosiery business with turnover <strong>of</strong><br />
Rs. 22 lakhs will not be required to get the accounts audited<br />
under section 44AB.<br />
17
8/23/2011<br />
Ans: (iii) Each firm is a separate person / assessee for the<br />
purpose <strong>of</strong> Income-tax Act. Therefore, the figures <strong>of</strong> sales <strong>of</strong><br />
each firm will have to be considered. In the given case, it will<br />
not be necessary for A & Co., B & Co., or C & Co., to get their<br />
accounts audited as the sales <strong>of</strong> any one <strong>of</strong> these firms do not<br />
exceed Rs. 60 Lakhs.<br />
Similarly, any partner <strong>of</strong> these firms will not be required to get<br />
his personal accounts audited if he is not carrying on any<br />
personal business having sales / turnover exceeding Rs. 60<br />
lakhs. The sales / turnover <strong>of</strong> the firms in which he is a partner<br />
cannot be taken into consideration for this purpose.<br />
Issue No. 10 - (i) A & Co. (Partnership firm) is appointed as<br />
selling agent <strong>of</strong> a textile mill. The firm canvasses orders for the<br />
mill. The goods are despatched by the mill to the customers<br />
introduced by A & Co. The sales bills are prepared by the mill.<br />
A & Co., recovers the sale proceeds and remits the same to the<br />
mill. The total sales organised by A & Co., during the year<br />
ended 31.03.2011 amounted to Rs. 20 crores. The commission<br />
@ 1% earned by A & co., amounted to Rs. 20 lakhs. Should A<br />
& Co., get their accounts audited under section 44AB ?<br />
18
8/23/2011<br />
(ii) In the above case if A & Co., had purchased cloth for Rs.<br />
55 lakhs and sold cloth worth Rs. 50 lakhs will the provisions<br />
<strong>of</strong> section 44AB apply ?<br />
Ans : (i) In this case, A & Co. is a selling agent <strong>of</strong> the textile<br />
mill. From the facts stated in the above issue, it is evident that<br />
the selling agent does not become the owner <strong>of</strong> the goods. The<br />
ownership continues to be that <strong>of</strong> the mill and it passes from the<br />
mill to the customer. The goods are despatched directly by the<br />
mill to the customers and sales bills are prepared by the mill.<br />
Therefore, the amount <strong>of</strong> the sales made by the mill<br />
cannot be taken into consideration for determining the<br />
liability <strong>of</strong> A & Co., to get its accounts audited under<br />
section 44AB. Since the commission income <strong>of</strong> A & Co.<br />
is only Rs. 20 lakhs and if there are any sales or other<br />
trading receipts <strong>of</strong> A & Co., which are less than Rs. 40<br />
lakhs, it will not be required to get its accounts audited<br />
under section 44AB.<br />
19
8/23/2011<br />
(ii) As stated above, because the commission income <strong>of</strong><br />
A & Co. is Rs. 20 lakhs and the sales <strong>of</strong> cloth amount to<br />
Rs. 50 lakhs the total turnover and gross receipts <strong>of</strong> A &<br />
Co. will exceed Rs. 60 lakhs and it will be necessary for<br />
it to get its accounts audited under section 44AB.<br />
Issue No. 11 - Mr. ‗B‘ has received goods worth Rs. 50 lakhs on<br />
consignment from P & Co. These goods were sold by Mr. ‗B‘ at<br />
Bombay for Rs. 62 lakhs. He has issued his own bills disclosing<br />
therein that the goods belong to P & Co. On completion <strong>of</strong> sales<br />
he had rendered accounts sales to P & Co. and remitted the sale<br />
proceeds after deducting Rs. 1 lakh being expenses incurred for<br />
sales and Rs. 50,000/- being his commission. For sales-tax<br />
purposes, he is required to record the above sales in his sales<br />
records. Should Mr. ‗B‘ get his accounts audited under section 44<br />
AB ?<br />
20
8/23/2011<br />
Ans : In this case, Mr. B is acting as consignment agent<br />
for P & Co. The sales made by Mr. B at Bombay for Rs.<br />
62 lakhs are made on behalf <strong>of</strong> P & Co. These sales<br />
cannot be considered as sales <strong>of</strong> Mr. B. He is only<br />
entitled to his commission <strong>of</strong> Rs. 50,000/- which will<br />
form part <strong>of</strong> his gross receipts. Therefore, Mr. B. will not<br />
be required to get his accounts audited under section 44<br />
AB if his total sales and gross receipts including<br />
commission income <strong>of</strong> Rs. 50,000/- does not exceed Rs.<br />
60 lakhs.<br />
Issue No. 12 - Sankhla industries is engaged in the manufacture <strong>of</strong><br />
electrical goods. The total sales / turnover exceeds Rs. 60 lakhs. It<br />
owns the following industrial units.<br />
(i) Enterprise engaged in infrastructure development deduction<br />
available under section 80IA.<br />
(ii) Industrial Unit in a backward are – deduction under section<br />
80IB.<br />
If the assessee gets its accounts audited under section 44AB, is it<br />
necessary to get separate audit reports under section 80IA(7) and<br />
80IB(13) read with 80IA(7)? In case audit is conducted under section<br />
80IA (7) and / or 80IB (13) read with section 80IA(7) which form<br />
should be used, Form No. 3CA or 3CB.<br />
21
8/23/2011<br />
Ans: Yes. It will be necessary to get a separate audit report under<br />
section 80(IA)(7) and 80(IB)(13) for each <strong>of</strong> the industrial unit.<br />
The finance Act, 2002 has amended these provisions making it<br />
mandatory for all assessees including companies and cooperative<br />
societies to submit a report under these sections. It is to be noted<br />
that audit report under section 80(IA)(7) and 80(IB) (13) is in<br />
respect <strong>of</strong> an industrial unit covered by the relevant provision<br />
whereas audit under section 44AB is in respect <strong>of</strong> an assessee<br />
covered by any <strong>of</strong> the clauses (a), (b) or (c).<br />
It is to be clarified that audit report in such cases will be<br />
in form No. 3CB in case the accounts <strong>of</strong> the assessee<br />
have not been audited under any other law such as<br />
Companies Act or Cooperative Societies Act etc. Audit<br />
under section 80(IA) or 80(IB) <strong>of</strong> the Income-tax Act<br />
will not be considered as audit under any other law. The<br />
requirement <strong>of</strong> section 44AB is a general one covering<br />
the overall position <strong>of</strong> the accounts <strong>of</strong> the assessee.<br />
22
8/23/2011<br />
This applies to the accounts <strong>of</strong> the assessee for the<br />
relevant year covering the results <strong>of</strong> all the industrial<br />
units situated at different places. Therefore, when the<br />
sales/turnover <strong>of</strong> all the units put together exceeds Rs.<br />
60lakhs the assessee will have to get the audit conducted<br />
under section 44AB and obtain the audit report in Form<br />
No. 3CB.<br />
Non Resident-Indian Operations:<br />
Issue No. 13- A foreign company has some business<br />
income from India. It has no permanent establishment<br />
in India. Since the income <strong>of</strong> the foreign company<br />
chargeable under the Income tax Act can not be<br />
precisely determined, the same has been assessed on the<br />
basis provided in Rule 10 <strong>of</strong> the Income tax Rules,<br />
1962. There are no separate books <strong>of</strong> account for Indian<br />
business. What are the tax audit report requirements?<br />
Should Form No. 3CD be submitted in respect <strong>of</strong> such a<br />
foreign company?<br />
23
8/23/2011<br />
Ans: Paragraph 6.3 clarifies that section 44AB does not make any<br />
distinction between a resident and a no-resident. Therefore, a nonresident<br />
assessee is also required to get his accounts audited and to<br />
furnish such report under section 44AB if his turnover exceeds the<br />
prescribed limits. This audit, however, would be confined only to the<br />
Indian operations carried out by the non-resident assessee since he is<br />
not chargeable to Income- tax in India in respect <strong>of</strong> income accruing or<br />
arising or received outside India. In the given issue, since there are no<br />
separate books <strong>of</strong> account for the Indian business, the tax auditor has to<br />
necessarily obtain relevant information from the overseas auditor for<br />
the purpose <strong>of</strong> enabling him to make the audit report and also furnish<br />
the necessary particulars.<br />
So far as audit report is concerned, Form No. 3CB should be used<br />
even if the accounts <strong>of</strong> the non-resident have been subject to audit<br />
by an auditor qualified to audit the accounts under the relevant<br />
statute <strong>of</strong> the country. It is also necessary to segregate the data<br />
relating to income chargeable under the Income-tax Act. The tax<br />
auditor has to make appropriate disclosures based on AAS-<br />
10(Revised) ―Using the work <strong>of</strong> another auditor‖.<br />
24
8/23/2011<br />
Issue No. 14 - Surrender <strong>of</strong> Stocks:<br />
A survey was conducted during the financial year<br />
2010/11 and the assessee surrendered stocks worth <strong>of</strong><br />
Rs. 22 lakhs. During the financial year 2010/11 the<br />
assessee is having a turnover <strong>of</strong> Rs. 49 lakhs. Should<br />
the value <strong>of</strong> surrendered stock be included in the<br />
turnover for determining the applicability <strong>of</strong> section<br />
44AB?<br />
Ans: The surrender <strong>of</strong> stock worth Rs. 22 lakhs during the survey<br />
does not mean that the turnover <strong>of</strong> the assessee for the relevant<br />
year exceeded Rs. 60 lakhs. Therefore, the value <strong>of</strong> surrendered<br />
stock cannot be treated as part <strong>of</strong> turnover for determining the<br />
applicability <strong>of</strong> section 44AB. It is also significant to note that<br />
paragraph 5.18 clarifies that section 44AB applies only if the<br />
turnover exceeds the prescribed limit according to the books<br />
maintained by the assessee.<br />
25
8/23/2011<br />
Issue No. 15 - Additional sales found as a result <strong>of</strong> search<br />
In Brijlal Goyal v. Asstt. CIT [2004] 88 ITD 413 (Delhi),<br />
The Tribunal held as under :<br />
―….. Admittedly, the additional sales found as a result <strong>of</strong> search, was not<br />
recorded in the books <strong>of</strong> account regularly kept in the course <strong>of</strong><br />
business by the appellant. Merely because the appellant accepted the<br />
additional sales for the purpose <strong>of</strong> assessment <strong>of</strong> the relevant year on<br />
the basis <strong>of</strong> entries in the seized documents, the same would not<br />
constitute accounts <strong>of</strong> the appellant maintained in the regular course <strong>of</strong><br />
business and on that basis alone liability cannot be fastened on the<br />
assessee by holding him to have committed the default.<br />
Issue No. 16 - Sale <strong>of</strong> car:<br />
Sale <strong>of</strong> car is not included in sales for the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />
tax audit but according to some Supreme Court<br />
judgments under Sales tax Act, the sale <strong>of</strong> a car is to be<br />
treated as sales and sales tax has to be charged. Then,<br />
why should the same be excluded for tax audit<br />
purposes?<br />
26
8/23/2011<br />
Ans: The sale <strong>of</strong> car is nothing but a sale <strong>of</strong> capital asset. The<br />
expression ‗total sales‘, ‗turnover‘ or ‗gross receipts‘ used in<br />
clause (a) <strong>of</strong> section 44AB should be understood in the context <strong>of</strong><br />
the expression ‗in business‘ appearing immediately thereafter in<br />
that very clause. The definition <strong>of</strong> ‗sales‘ under the Sales-tax Act<br />
<strong>of</strong> any state is not relevant for determining the applicability <strong>of</strong><br />
section 44AB. Paragraphs 5.8(vi) and 5.13 (i) clarify that the sale<br />
proceeds <strong>of</strong> fixed assets would not from part <strong>of</strong> turnover gross<br />
receipts since these are not held for resale.<br />
Issue No. 17 - Write back:<br />
As a result <strong>of</strong> writing back the account <strong>of</strong> a creditor, the<br />
turnover/gross receipt has exceeded Rs. 60 lakhs.<br />
Will the assessee be liable for tax audit?<br />
27
8/23/2011<br />
Ans: Writing back <strong>of</strong> the amount payable to a creditor <strong>of</strong><br />
which a deduction has been claimed is deemed as<br />
income for the purpose <strong>of</strong> section 41(1) <strong>of</strong> the Incometax<br />
Act, 1961. The amount so written back would not<br />
form part <strong>of</strong> gross receipt and as such will not be<br />
includible while determining the quantum for<br />
applicability <strong>of</strong> section 44AB (para 5.13 (xi) <strong>of</strong><br />
guidance note on tax audit revised 2005 edition). It is<br />
also neither sales not turnover.<br />
Issue No. 18 - Inclusion <strong>of</strong> Sales-tax:<br />
16. A, an assessee, provides the following figures:<br />
Sales<br />
Rs. 58 lakhs<br />
Vat tax collected<br />
Rs. 3 Lakhs<br />
Is A liable for tax audit under section 44AB?<br />
28
8/23/2011<br />
Ans: The words ‗sales‘, ‗turnover‘ and gross receipts‘<br />
are commercial terms and they should be construed in<br />
accordance with the method <strong>of</strong> accounting regularly<br />
employed by the assessee. If the Vat tax collected is<br />
credited separately to Vat tax account and payments<br />
there<strong>of</strong> are debited in the same account, they would<br />
not be included in the turnover. (Para 5.5 and 5.6 <strong>of</strong><br />
ICAI‘s guidance note on tax audit revised 2005<br />
edition).<br />
Issue No. 19 - Sales through stalls:<br />
‗AK‘ Pvt. Ltd. is running a departmental store. There are<br />
several stalls. Each stalls belongs to a different person.<br />
According to the arrangement by the stall owners with ‗AK‘<br />
Pvt. Ltd., all sales proceeds are to be collected on the printed<br />
bills <strong>of</strong> ‗AK‘ Pvt. Ltd. The delivery counter is common for all<br />
stall owners and the same is managed by ‗AK‘ Pvt. Ltd The<br />
premises belongs to ‗AK‘ Pvt. Ltd. who takes out insurance and<br />
also makes security arrangements. The proceeds <strong>of</strong> all sales<br />
made by various stall owners are collected by ‗AK‘ Pvt, Ltd.<br />
29
8/23/2011<br />
At the end <strong>of</strong> every week ‗AK‘ Pvt. Ltd. makes up the<br />
sales account <strong>of</strong> each stall owner and after deducting<br />
charges/commission at the agreed rate remits the<br />
balance amount to each stall owners. The total<br />
turnover on the above basis works out to about Rs. 3<br />
crores. However, the income <strong>of</strong> ‗AK‘ Pvt. Ltd. from<br />
charges/commission recovered from the stall owners is<br />
Rs. 30 lakhs. Is ‗AK‘ Pvt. Ltd. liable to get its<br />
accounts audited under section 44AB?<br />
Ans: It will not be necessary for ‗AK‘ Pvt Ltd. To get its<br />
accounts audited under section 44AB. The sales in this case<br />
cannot be considered as the sales <strong>of</strong> ‗AK‘ Pvt. Ltd. These are<br />
sales <strong>of</strong> the stall owners. ‗AK‖ Pvt Ltd. has only undertaken to<br />
render services like providing space, making security<br />
arrangements, taking out insurance, collection <strong>of</strong> sale proceeds<br />
on behalf <strong>of</strong> the stall owners and rendering account to them.<br />
The commission earned for these services does not exceed the<br />
limit <strong>of</strong> Rs. 60 Lakhs prescribed in section 44AB. Therefore,<br />
the provisions <strong>of</strong> section 44AB are not attracted in this case.<br />
30
8/23/2011<br />
Discuss the following issues:<br />
Issue No. 20 - Leasing<br />
a) In the case <strong>of</strong> a company engaged in the business <strong>of</strong> equipment<br />
leasing will the provisions <strong>of</strong> section 44AB for tax audit apply<br />
b) In the case <strong>of</strong> a company engaged in leasing finance, will the<br />
provisions <strong>of</strong> section 44AB for tax audit apply?<br />
c) In the above cases how will the monetary limit <strong>of</strong> Rs. 60 lakhs<br />
for turnover or gross receipts be computed?<br />
d) In the case <strong>of</strong> a company supplying equipment on hire purchase<br />
basis how will the monetary limit <strong>of</strong> Rs. 60 lakhs be computed<br />
for the purpose <strong>of</strong> section 44AB?<br />
Ans: (i) In the case <strong>of</strong> a company engaged in the<br />
business <strong>of</strong> equipment leasing the provisions <strong>of</strong> section<br />
44AB for tax audit will apply if its gross receipts from<br />
lease rent exceed Rs. 60 lakhs.<br />
(ii) In the case <strong>of</strong> a company engaged in the<br />
business <strong>of</strong> leasing finance, the provisions <strong>of</strong> section<br />
44AB for tax audit will apply if its gross receipts from<br />
the leasing finance exceed Rs. 60 Lakhs.<br />
31
8/23/2011<br />
(iii) The monetary limit <strong>of</strong> Rs. 60 lakhs will be computed in the above<br />
cases with reference to lease rent or interest on financing. The value<br />
<strong>of</strong> the equipment given on lease or the amount advanced under<br />
leasing finance cannot be considered for this purpose.<br />
(iv) When equipment is supplied on hire-purchase basis, the sale is<br />
complete when the person taking the equipment exercises his option<br />
to purchase. Therefore, during the years when hire charges (excluding<br />
instalments <strong>of</strong> principal amount) are received by the company, the<br />
figure <strong>of</strong> such charges will from part <strong>of</strong> its gross receipts. When the<br />
purchaser exercises his option to purchase, the price at which the<br />
equipment is sold to him will form part <strong>of</strong> total sales or turnover <strong>of</strong><br />
that year.<br />
Issue No. 21 - Form No. 3CA/3CB:<br />
a) The accounting year <strong>of</strong> an assessee has been changed<br />
from calendar year to April to March. Accordingly, the<br />
accounts have been drawn for the period from January,<br />
2010 to March 31,2011 which have already been<br />
audited for tax audit. Which form <strong>of</strong> audit report<br />
should be used? Form No. 3CA or Form No. 3CB?<br />
Should separate accounts have to be drawn for the<br />
period from 1 st April, 2010 to 31 st March, 2011?<br />
32
8/23/2011<br />
(b) Rule 6G(a) provides that in the case <strong>of</strong> a person who<br />
carries on business or pr<strong>of</strong>ession and who is required by or<br />
under any other law to get his accounts audited the audit<br />
report should be in Form No. 3CA. Under the Companies<br />
Act, all companies are required get their accounts audited.<br />
However the accounting year for the Companies Act can<br />
be different from that <strong>of</strong> the previous year under the<br />
Income tax Act e.g. under the Companies Act it may be,<br />
say, 30 th September. In such cases how can the company<br />
comply with the requirements <strong>of</strong> Form No. 3CA?<br />
Ans: Issues (a) and (b) are answered together. The previous<br />
year for tax purposes shall always be the financial year as<br />
per section 3 <strong>of</strong> the Income-tax Act. Therefore the final<br />
accounts along with tax audit report have to be <strong>of</strong> the<br />
financial year. Accordingly in case the annual accounts<br />
i.e. balance sheet and pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account have not<br />
been audited and certified, it cannot fulfill the<br />
requirement <strong>of</strong> Form No. 3CA which requires the tax<br />
auditor to enclose the ‗audited‘ pr<strong>of</strong>it balance sheet as at<br />
31 st March.<br />
33
8/23/2011<br />
Hence, in such cases the tax payer is required to prepare a separate<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account and balance sheet as at 31 st March and get<br />
the same audited and the tax auditor is to give the report in Form<br />
No. 3CB whereby he is required first to certify the true and fair<br />
view <strong>of</strong> the balance sheet and pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account and furnish<br />
statement <strong>of</strong> particulars in Form No. 3CD.<br />
Though Rule 6G(1)(a) provides that a person who carries on<br />
business or pr<strong>of</strong>ession and who is required by or under any other<br />
law to get his accounts audited the tax audit report should be in<br />
Form No. 3CA, the word ―accounts‖ here has to be interpreted in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> the requirement <strong>of</strong> Form No. 3CA.<br />
―Accounts‖ here will mean the accounts i.e. pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss<br />
account and the balance sheet and tax audit report. In case<br />
the accounts i.e. pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account and balance sheet<br />
with tax audit report has not been audited under any other<br />
law, the correct form will be Form No. 3CB. [Circular No.<br />
561 dated 22.05.1990 vide page 167 <strong>of</strong> guidance note on tax<br />
audit revised 2005 edition.]<br />
34
8/23/2011<br />
Issue No. 22 - Revision <strong>of</strong> Tax Audit Report:<br />
Can a tax auditor revise his tax audit report and Form No.<br />
3CD?<br />
Ans: A tax auditor should exercise extreme care and caution<br />
while discharging his responsibilities. He should ensure that<br />
correct information has been given in Form No. 3CA/3CB<br />
and 3CD. However, if he feels that there is a need for revising<br />
the audit report and / or Form No. 3CD, it is advisable to do<br />
so in a timely manner and he should clearly indicate the<br />
reasons for giving a revised report. Attention is also invited to<br />
paragraph 13. 9 and to the guidance note on revision <strong>of</strong> Audit<br />
Report which deals with this aspect elaborately.<br />
35
8/23/2011<br />
Issue No. 23 - Relying on the work <strong>of</strong> statutory<br />
auditor<br />
(i) A tax auditor does not agree with the treatment given<br />
in the audited financial statements in respect <strong>of</strong> (i)<br />
personal expenses, (ii) capital expenditure, (iii)<br />
valuation <strong>of</strong> stock-in-trade (iv) method <strong>of</strong> accounting<br />
or (v) other matters covered in Form No. 3CD.<br />
(ii) If the statutory auditor has not qualified his audit<br />
report on these matters, can the tax auditor qualify his<br />
report in Form No. 3CA and make appropriate<br />
comments in Form No. 3CD?<br />
Ans: (i) In case where statutory audit under any other law has<br />
been conducted by an auditor other than the tax auditor the<br />
requirement <strong>of</strong> section 44AB read with Rule 6G(1)(a) is to<br />
enclose a report <strong>of</strong> such audit and the tax auditor is required<br />
to furnish statement <strong>of</strong> particulars in Form No. 3CD and<br />
certify that the particulars given in the said Form No. 3CD are<br />
true and correct. The tax auditor is not required to comment<br />
upon the audit report given by the statutory auditor. As such<br />
there will be no requirement on the part <strong>of</strong> tax auditor to<br />
qualify his report in Form No. 3CA.<br />
36
8/23/2011<br />
(ii) The tax auditor, however, has the primary responsibility <strong>of</strong><br />
the verification <strong>of</strong> the particulars prescribed in Form No. 3CD<br />
and he should ensure that the particulars stated are in<br />
conformity with the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Income-tax Act.<br />
Normally the tax auditor should accept the treatment given to<br />
various items in the financial statements which have been<br />
audited by the statutory auditor. If, however, while conducting<br />
tax audit he is unable to agree with the treatment given to a<br />
particular item in the audited financial statement, he should first<br />
ascertain preferably from the statutory auditor, the reasons for his<br />
giving such a treatment in his statement.<br />
It is possible that statutory auditor while considering the items<br />
on (i) personal expenses, (ii) capital expenditure, (iii) valuation<br />
<strong>of</strong> stock and trade, (iv) method <strong>of</strong> accounting or other matter<br />
covered in Form NO.3CD might have dealt with the item from<br />
the angle <strong>of</strong> generally accepted accounting principle or statutory<br />
provisions covering the entity. The responsibility <strong>of</strong> furnishing<br />
true and correct particulars in Form NO.3CD is that <strong>of</strong> the entity.<br />
For this purpose, statutory provision and judicial pronouncement<br />
under tax laws have to be taken into consideration.<br />
37
8/23/2011<br />
The tax auditor should verify and ensure that particulars in<br />
respect <strong>of</strong> the above items such as personal expenses, capital<br />
expenditure, valuation <strong>of</strong> stock and trade, method <strong>of</strong> accounting<br />
etc. are given on the basis <strong>of</strong> explanations above. However, any<br />
difference between the figures given in the audited financial<br />
statements and figures given in Form No.3CD should be<br />
explained by giving appropriate notes. If, however, there is any<br />
difference in the opinion <strong>of</strong> the tax auditor and that <strong>of</strong> the entity<br />
in respect <strong>of</strong> any information furnished in Form No.3CD, the tax<br />
auditor should state both the view points and also the relevant<br />
information. Attention is invited to paragraph 16.3. <strong>of</strong> revised<br />
guidance note on tax audit 2005 edition.<br />
Issue No. 24 – Advance received for services are rendered.<br />
These are liabilities and not part <strong>of</strong> gross receipts until services are<br />
rendered. -<br />
For contrary viewpoint- see Dy. CIT v. Gopal Krishan<br />
Builders.[2004] 91 ITD 124 (Lucknow)(SMC).<br />
The Tribunal held that each and every word used in any statute has<br />
its importance and is used by legislature after a lot <strong>of</strong> deliberations.<br />
38
8/23/2011<br />
The words used in section 44AB: ―total sales‖, ―turnover‖ or<br />
―gross receipts‘ have been used specifically and the scope <strong>of</strong> the<br />
words ‗gross receipts‘ is quite wide otherwise legislature would<br />
have stopped after using the words ‗sales‘ or ‗turnover‘,<br />
Further, these advances were having an element <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it. The<br />
amount was to be adjusted towards the cost <strong>of</strong> flats booked by each<br />
customer and the amounts will have an element <strong>of</strong> construction<br />
cost as well as pr<strong>of</strong>it which might be bigger in proportion when<br />
whole <strong>of</strong> the cost is realized.<br />
What assessees should do to determine applicability <strong>of</strong> tax audit<br />
u/s 44AB is as under (in the light <strong>of</strong> Tribunal‘s decision):<br />
a) In cases <strong>of</strong> business which do not have ―turnover‘ or ―total sales‖<br />
and ―pr<strong>of</strong>essions‖<br />
Determine gross receipts – i.e. total amounts received (including<br />
advances) which have pr<strong>of</strong>it-making quality about them. If ―gross<br />
receipts‘ exceed Rs. 60 lakhs / Rs. 15 lakhs as the case may be, tax<br />
audit is applicable.<br />
39
8/23/2011<br />
b) In cases <strong>of</strong> businesses in manufacturing / trading sector-i.e.<br />
businesses which have ―turnover‖ / ‗sales‖ – The following steps are<br />
necessary:<br />
1. Determine ―Sales‘ / Turnover‘ as per the method <strong>of</strong> accounting<br />
regularly employed by the assessee – (Cash or mercantile system) and<br />
excluding sales tax / duty / other taxes.<br />
2. Determine gross receipts- i.e. total amounts received (including<br />
advances) which have pr<strong>of</strong>it – making quality about them (as per<br />
Tribunal‘s decision above).<br />
3. If ―Sales‖ or ―Turnover‖ or ―Gross receipts‖ exceed Rs. 60 Lakhs, tax<br />
audit is applicable.<br />
c) If there is no sales / turnover / work done or completed<br />
during the financial year but only advances have been received<br />
(to be adjusted against value to be provided by way <strong>of</strong> goods /<br />
services); then if total advances received exceeds Rs. 60 Lakhs /<br />
Rs. 15 Lakhs, as the case may be, tax audit under section 44AB<br />
is applicable.<br />
40
8/23/2011<br />
Special provision for computing pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains <strong>of</strong> business<br />
on presumptive basis.<br />
(1) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in<br />
sections 28 to 43C, in the case <strong>of</strong> an eligible assessee engaged<br />
in an eligible business, a sum equal to eight per cent <strong>of</strong> the total<br />
turnover or gross receipts <strong>of</strong> the assessee in the previous year<br />
on account <strong>of</strong> such business or, as the case may be, a sum<br />
higher than the aforesaid sum claimed to have been earned by<br />
the eligible assessee, shall be deemed to be the pr<strong>of</strong>its and<br />
gains <strong>of</strong> such business chargeable to tax under the head ―Pr<strong>of</strong>its<br />
and gains <strong>of</strong> business or pr<strong>of</strong>ession‖.<br />
(2) Any deduction allowable under the provisions <strong>of</strong> sections 30<br />
to 38 shall, for the purposes <strong>of</strong> sub-section (1), be deemed to<br />
have been already given full effect to and no further deduction<br />
under those sections shall be allowed :<br />
Provided that where the eligible assessee is a firm, the salary<br />
and interest paid to its partners shall be deducted from the<br />
income computed under sub-section (1) subject to the<br />
conditions and limits specified in clause (b) <strong>of</strong> section 40.<br />
41
8/23/2011<br />
(3) The written down value <strong>of</strong> any asset <strong>of</strong> an eligible business<br />
shall be deemed to have been calculated as if the eligible<br />
assessee had claimed and had been actually allowed the<br />
deduction in respect <strong>of</strong> the depreciation for each <strong>of</strong> the relevant<br />
assessment years.<br />
(4) The provisions <strong>of</strong> Chapter XVII-C shall not apply to an<br />
eligible assessee in so far as they relate to the eligible business.<br />
(5) Notwithstanding anything contained in the foregoing<br />
provisions <strong>of</strong> this section, an eligible assessee who claims that<br />
his pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains from the eligible business are lower than<br />
the pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains specified in sub-section (1) and whose<br />
total income exceeds the maximum amount which is not<br />
chargeable to income-tax, shall be required to keep and<br />
maintain such books <strong>of</strong> account and other documents as<br />
required under sub-section (2) <strong>of</strong> section 44AA and get them<br />
audited and furnish a report <strong>of</strong> such audit as required under<br />
section 44AB.<br />
42
8/23/2011<br />
Explanation.—For the purposes <strong>of</strong> this section,—<br />
(a)<br />
―eligible assessee‖ means,—<br />
(i) an individual, Hindu undivided family or a partnership firm, who is a<br />
resident, but not a limited liability partnership firm as defined under clause (n)<br />
<strong>of</strong> sub-section (1) <strong>of</strong> section 2 <strong>of</strong> the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 (6<br />
<strong>of</strong> 2009) and<br />
(ii) who has not claimed deduction under any <strong>of</strong> the sections 10A, 10AA,<br />
10B, 10BA or deduction under any provisions <strong>of</strong> Chapter VIA under the<br />
heading ―C. - Deductions in respect <strong>of</strong> certain incomes‖ in the relevant<br />
assessment year;<br />
(b) ―eligible business‖ means,—<br />
(i) any business except the business <strong>of</strong> plying, hiring or leasing goods<br />
carriages referred to in section 44AE; and<br />
(ii) whose total turnover or gross receipts in the previous year does not<br />
exceed an amount <strong>of</strong> [sixty lakh rupees].]<br />
Critical analysis <strong>of</strong> section 44AD<br />
43
8/23/2011<br />
Till the 31 st March,2010, the Chapter Pr<strong>of</strong>it & gains <strong>of</strong><br />
Small business on Presumptive Basis was having majorly 3<br />
sections for Indian entities.<br />
> Section 44AD civil construction<br />
> Section 44AE Transporters<br />
> Section 44AF Retail Traders<br />
From 01.04.2010 the honorable finance minister Mr.<br />
Pranab Mukherjee has amended the first section i.e.<br />
44AD along with 5 sub sections to facilitate the business<br />
operations <strong>of</strong> small taxpayers<br />
Earlier this section was extended to civil constructions<br />
only but now this section has been extended to all small<br />
businesses.<br />
44
8/23/2011<br />
The new section 44AD is as follows: 44AD<br />
(1)<br />
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained<br />
in sections 28 to 43C, in the case <strong>of</strong> an eligible<br />
assessee engaged in an eligible business, a sum equal<br />
to eight per cent <strong>of</strong> the total turnover or gross<br />
receipts <strong>of</strong> the assessee in the previous year on<br />
account <strong>of</strong> such business or, as the case may be, a<br />
sum higher than the aforesaid sum claimed to have<br />
been earned by the eligible assessee, shall be deemed<br />
to be the pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains <strong>of</strong> such<br />
business chargeable to tax under the head “Pr<strong>of</strong>its<br />
and gains <strong>of</strong> business or pr<strong>of</strong>ession”.<br />
For better understanding <strong>of</strong> sub section 1 <strong>of</strong> newly<br />
inserted section 44AD, we must know the meaning <strong>of</strong><br />
following:<br />
> Eligible Assessee<br />
> Eligible Business<br />
> Total Turnover/Gross receipts<br />
> Significance <strong>of</strong> Word Gross Receipts<br />
> Claimed to have been earned<br />
45
8/23/2011<br />
1. Who is an Eligible Assessee?<br />
(explanation to Section 44AD)<br />
(a) ―eligible assessee‖ means:-<br />
(1) an individual<br />
(2) Hindu undivided family<br />
(3) or a partnership firm<br />
who is a resident.<br />
but not a limited liability partnership firm as<br />
defined under clause (n) <strong>of</strong> sub-section (1) <strong>of</strong> section 2<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 (6 <strong>of</strong> 2009);<br />
and<br />
(explanation to Section 44AD)<br />
(ii) who has not claimed deduction under any <strong>of</strong> the sections<br />
10A, 10AA, 10B, 10BA or deduction under any provisions <strong>of</strong><br />
Chapter VIA under the heading ―C. - Deductions in respect<br />
<strong>of</strong> certain incomes‖ in the relevant assessment year;<br />
46
8/23/2011<br />
Who all are the aseessees not covered under Section 44AD?<br />
> Individual who is not resident<br />
> HUF who is not Resident<br />
> Association <strong>of</strong> Person<br />
> Firm having non resident Status.<br />
> A local Authority<br />
> A co-operative Society<br />
> Limited Liability Partnership both Indian as well as Foreign<br />
> Companies both Domestic and Foreign company<br />
> Every Artificial Juridical Person<br />
> Individual/HUF/Firms claiming deduction under chapter III <strong>of</strong> the Act<br />
i.e Section 10A,10AA,10B,10BA relating to units located in FREE<br />
Trade Zone, Hardware & S<strong>of</strong>tware Technology Park etc.<br />
> Individual/HUF/Firms claiming deduction under Chapter VIA Part-C<br />
(deductions in respect <strong>of</strong> certain Incomes) i.e Section 80H to 80TT.<br />
2. What is eligible Business ?<br />
(explanation to Section 44AD)<br />
(b)eligible business means,<br />
(i) any business except the business <strong>of</strong> plying, hiring or leasing<br />
goods carriages referred to in section 44AE; and<br />
(ii) whose total turnover or gross receipts in the previous<br />
year does not exceed an amount <strong>of</strong>[sixty lakh rupees].<br />
Meaning <strong>of</strong> the above section:<br />
Eligible Business covers any business except Transport<br />
Business (Transportation Business has special treatment under<br />
section 44AE).<br />
47
8/23/2011<br />
This provision is straightforward and includes all the<br />
business whether it is:<br />
.<br />
> Manufacturing<br />
> Trading<br />
> Wholesale<br />
> Retail<br />
> Job Work<br />
> Service business<br />
> Speculative/ Non speculative.<br />
The only criteria is that, the turnover <strong>of</strong> eligible<br />
Business should not exceed Rs. Sixty lakhs in the<br />
previous Year.<br />
What is not included in the Business?<br />
.<br />
The pr<strong>of</strong>ession is not included in the business because:<br />
There is specific reference to the word Business in<br />
Section 44AD, which does not include pr<strong>of</strong>ession, and<br />
There is specific Turnover limit <strong>of</strong> Rs. 15 Lakhs for<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>ession under section 44AB, which means that<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ession is totally separate from Business.<br />
48
8/23/2011<br />
<br />
How to calculate limit <strong>of</strong> 60 lakhs?<br />
The Total Turnover and Gross receipts should be less than 60 lacs in<br />
the previous Year.<br />
It includes all the eligible businesses carried on by a eligible assessee<br />
during the previous year and the 60 lakhs will be for all <strong>of</strong> them<br />
cumulatively.<br />
Few Examples:<br />
1. Manish, a resident individual, is carrying on three eligible<br />
businesses, the turnover <strong>of</strong> which is as under :<br />
> Business A (Manufacturing) Rs. 25 Lac<br />
> Business B (Trading) Rs. 15 Lac<br />
> Business C (Service) Rs. 25 Lac<br />
Whether section 44AD is applicable on him?<br />
The Answer is NO because turnover <strong>of</strong> eligible business<br />
exceed Rs. 60 Lakhs.<br />
49
8/23/2011<br />
<br />
2. Manish, a resident individual, is carrying on two businesses, the<br />
turnover <strong>of</strong> which is as under :<br />
> Business A (Eligible Business) Rs. 55 Lacs<br />
> Pr<strong>of</strong>ession Rs. 10 Lacs<br />
> Business B (Transport u/s 44AE) Rs. 6 Lacs<br />
Section 44AD and 44AE both are applicable, as pr<strong>of</strong>ession is not<br />
included under section 44AD and section 44AD and 44AE are<br />
independent <strong>of</strong> each other.<br />
Who bears the onus <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong> to prove the turnover?<br />
The onus <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong> is on the assessee. It is his duty to prove the<br />
turnover. If the assessee is maintaining the books <strong>of</strong> accounts, then it<br />
will be easy for him to prove the same, but if he is not maintaining<br />
the books <strong>of</strong> accounts, then it will be very difficult for him to prove,<br />
because there is no specific provision for the same.<br />
What documents you should provide to the AO to prove<br />
the turnover?<br />
- copies <strong>of</strong> invoices issued during the PY<br />
- copies <strong>of</strong> cash memo<br />
- copies <strong>of</strong> Purchase bill<br />
- Bank statement<br />
- Inventory details, if any maintained<br />
- Average G.P rate applicable to Particular business<br />
- Returns filed under sales tax/vat/excise/service Tax laws.<br />
50
8/23/2011<br />
What is the meaning <strong>of</strong> Notwithstanding<br />
Anything to contrary contained in section 28 to<br />
43C<br />
Section 44AD(1) starts with wording Notwithstanding Anything to contrary contained in<br />
section 28 to 43C it means section 28 to 43C <strong>of</strong> Income Tax Act, 1961 is not applicable on<br />
eligible assessee carrying on small business.<br />
The some <strong>of</strong> the benefits & losses <strong>of</strong> this wording is enumerated as under by way <strong>of</strong> examples<br />
:<br />
Manish has paid Rs. 28000/- for purchase <strong>of</strong> goods in cash. No disallowance can be made<br />
under section 40A(3) for the same.<br />
Ashish has paid Rs. 42000/- to transporter for freight in cash. No disallowance can be made<br />
under Section 40A (3).<br />
Vipin has contributed certain sum to national Laboratory which qualifies for deduction under<br />
section 35(2AA), if he chooses section 44AD , he will not eligible for benefit <strong>of</strong> this section.<br />
Vicky has recovered certain bad debts written <strong>of</strong>f in earlier years <strong>of</strong> Rs. 35000/-. It may not be<br />
added in specified amount declared<br />
What is the meaning <strong>of</strong> Claimed to have<br />
been earned?<br />
By the introduction <strong>of</strong> these words in section 44AD(1), the<br />
legislature shows its intention to accept specified income as<br />
returned income even if higher sum is earned by eligible<br />
assessee unless it is claimed by assessee in his Income Tax<br />
Return.<br />
Example<br />
Manish is carrying on small business . The Turnover is Rs. 50<br />
lakhs. The pr<strong>of</strong>it as per his books or calculation is Rs. 8 Lakhs.<br />
However, he opts to return the income under section 44AD<br />
@ 8% i.e Rs. 4 Lakhs. The proceeds <strong>of</strong> business are deposited<br />
in a bank account.<br />
51
8/23/2011<br />
Can the AO assess the difference<br />
amount as undisclosed income?<br />
Section 44AD(2)<br />
(2) Any deduction allowable under the provisions <strong>of</strong> sections<br />
30 to 38<br />
shall, for the purposes <strong>of</strong> sub-section (1), be deemed to have been<br />
already given full effect to and no further deduction under those<br />
sections shall be allowed<br />
.<br />
Provided that where the eligible assessee is a firm, the salary<br />
and interest paid to its partners shall be deducted from the<br />
income computed under sub-section (1) subject to the<br />
conditions and limits specified in clause (b) <strong>of</strong> section 40<br />
52
8/23/2011<br />
Computation <strong>of</strong> Taxable Pr<strong>of</strong>it u/s 44AD in case <strong>of</strong><br />
Partnership Firm<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>it from Business<br />
Particulars<br />
Amount<br />
44 AD ( Say the turnover is Rs. 50 lacs) then the 4,00,000<br />
income would be 8%<br />
Less:<br />
Interest allowable u/s 40(b) 1,20,000<br />
Remuneration to partners allowable 1,80,000<br />
Total Income <strong>of</strong> the Firm U/s. 44AD 1,00,000<br />
Section 44AD (3)<br />
The written down value <strong>of</strong> any asset <strong>of</strong> an eligible<br />
business shall be deemed to have been calculated as<br />
if the eligible assessee had claimed and had been<br />
actually allowed the deduction in respect <strong>of</strong> the<br />
depreciation for each <strong>of</strong> the relevant assessment<br />
years.<br />
53
8/23/2011<br />
Few Examples<br />
Manish a resident individual having a machinery<br />
<strong>of</strong> Rs. 2,00,000/- as on 31-03-2011 eligible for depreciation<br />
under section 32 @ 15%.In A.Y 2011-12, he opts for Section<br />
44AD. In the Assessment Year 2012-13, his turnover is Rs. 70<br />
lakh, so he calculated his pr<strong>of</strong>it as per normal provisions <strong>of</strong><br />
the Act. In A.Y 2013-14, he again opts for Section 44AD, In<br />
this Assessment year he sold the Assets for Rs. 1,50,000/-.<br />
Calculation <strong>of</strong> WDV:<br />
Particulars<br />
Amount<br />
WDV as on 31-03-2011 2,00,000<br />
Less: Depreciation @<br />
30,000<br />
15%<br />
WDV as on 31-03-2012 1,70,000<br />
Less: Depreciation @<br />
25,500<br />
15%<br />
WDV as on 31-03-2013 1,44,500<br />
Less : Sale Price 150,000<br />
WDV as on 31-03-2014<br />
Nil<br />
54
8/23/2011<br />
Calculation <strong>of</strong> Capital Gains<br />
Particulars<br />
Amount<br />
Sale Consideration 1,50,000<br />
Less WDV as on 31-03-2013 1,44,500<br />
Short Term capital gain U/s 50 5,500<br />
Whether the Assessee can carry forward unabsorbed<br />
depreciation?<br />
As per the subsection (3) <strong>of</strong> section 44AD, the Act clearly<br />
states that the depreciation is deemed to have been<br />
allowed u/s. 32 and the same has been deemed to have<br />
been set <strong>of</strong>f against the pr<strong>of</strong>it. Hence the same cannot be<br />
allowed to be allowed to be carried forward.<br />
55
8/23/2011<br />
Section 44AD(4)<br />
The provisions <strong>of</strong> Chapter XVII-C shall not apply to an eligible<br />
assessee in so far as they relate to the eligible business.<br />
<br />
Chapter XVII-C deals with provisions relating to Advance Payment <strong>of</strong> Tax.<br />
On plain reading <strong>of</strong> this subsection, we conclude that eligible assessees are exempt<br />
from payment <strong>of</strong> Advance Tax. But the second part <strong>of</strong> Provision creates a blunder so<br />
far it relates to eligible business, which creates lot <strong>of</strong> doubt.<br />
The following example will better clear your understanding :<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>it under section 44ADRs. = 4.00 lacs<br />
(Say Turnover is Rs. 50 lakhs)<br />
Interest Income = Rs.5.00 Lacs<br />
Total Income = Rs.9.00 lacs<br />
In this situation, whether the assessee is exempted from provisions <strong>of</strong> advance tax<br />
in all or whether the assessee is liable to Pay advance Tax on interest income <strong>of</strong><br />
Rs.5.00 lac.<br />
From the understanding <strong>of</strong> Law, it is clear that the assessee have to pay advance tax<br />
on interest income <strong>of</strong> Rs.5.00 lac. But how this tax calculation is to be made is no<br />
where defined in legislature?<br />
SECTION 44AD(5)<br />
This sub-section has created lots <strong>of</strong> doubts and debates in the<br />
mind <strong>of</strong> all the CAs and Tax consultants. This Sub-section is<br />
very much important for all the very small businessmen. Please<br />
give attention and read it care fully.<br />
.<br />
Notwithstanding anything contained in the foregoing<br />
provisions <strong>of</strong> this section, an eligible assessee who claims<br />
that his pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains from the eligible business are<br />
lower than the pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains specified in sub-section<br />
(1) and whose total income exceeds the maximum<br />
amount which is not chargeable to income-tax, shall be<br />
required to keep and maintain such books <strong>of</strong> account and<br />
other documents as required under sub-section (2)<br />
<strong>of</strong> section 44AA and get them audited and furnish a<br />
report <strong>of</strong> such audit as required under<br />
56
8/23/2011<br />
section 44AB<br />
The assessee is bound to get the books <strong>of</strong> accounts<br />
audited, if the following two conditions are satisfied:-<br />
1. His pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains from the eligible business<br />
are lower than the pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains specified in<br />
sub-section (1) i.e. his net pr<strong>of</strong>it is lower than 8%<br />
<strong>of</strong> turnover.<br />
and<br />
2. Whose total income exceeds the maximum<br />
amount which is not chargeable to income-tax.<br />
<br />
Here see both the conditions are simultaneous and the assessee<br />
required to get his accounts audit only and only if his pr<strong>of</strong>its from<br />
the business u/s 44AD are lower than 8% <strong>of</strong> this turnover and<br />
further his total income is more than maximum amount which is<br />
not liable to tax.<br />
The minimum amount which is not liable to tax for Assessment Year<br />
: 2011 -12 is Rs. 1.60 Lakh and the turnover <strong>of</strong> the eligible business<br />
is Rs. 38 Lakhs and the Net pr<strong>of</strong>it is Rs. 1.52 lacs which comes to<br />
only 4% hence the first condition for the compulsory audit is there<br />
but since the income is only Rs.1.52 Lakhs hence the second<br />
condition <strong>of</strong> section 44AD(5) is not complete, hence the audit is not<br />
mandatory.<br />
If whatever mentioned above is the intention <strong>of</strong> law then in most <strong>of</strong><br />
the cases where the income <strong>of</strong> the assessee is below taxable limit,<br />
they are not required to get their books <strong>of</strong> accounts audited, even if<br />
the rate <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it is below 8%<br />
57
8/23/2011<br />
Exception to Tax Audit:<br />
<br />
<br />
Once a person gets covered under any one <strong>of</strong> the four categories, Tax audit<br />
becomes mandatory. But there are two exceptions to tax audit. The first<br />
proviso to Section 44AB, exempts business covered under Section 44B and<br />
44BBA from the purview <strong>of</strong> tax audit. But the second proviso is something<br />
more interesting. The second proviso says that if the accounts <strong>of</strong> a person<br />
are to be audited under any other law, it would be sufficient if the accounts<br />
are audited under that law before the 30 th <strong>of</strong> September. The accounts need<br />
not once again be audited by an Accountant but the report in form 3CA<br />
and 3CD needs to be obtained from an Accountant.<br />
The effects <strong>of</strong> this section arouse much fascination. Since Companies are<br />
required to be audited under the Companies Act, 1956, they need not be<br />
audited once again under Section 44AB. It is sufficient if the audit reports in<br />
the prescribed forms are obtained. This is even more fascinating in the Case<br />
<strong>of</strong> Co-operative Societies. Co-ops are required to be audited under the<br />
Co-operative Societies Act, but the auditor <strong>of</strong> a co-op need not be a CA.<br />
Even then a co-op need not be once again audited under Section 44AB.<br />
Case Studies u/s. 44AD:-<br />
NATURE OF<br />
BUSINESS<br />
CIVIL<br />
CONSTRUCTION<br />
CIVIL<br />
CONSTRUCTION<br />
STATUS<br />
GROSS<br />
TURNOVER/<br />
RECEIPTS<br />
NET<br />
PROFIT<br />
WHETHER LIABLE TO AUDIT<br />
U/S. 44AB<br />
INDIVIDUAL RS. 50 LAKHS Rs. 410000/- No Since Net pr<strong>of</strong>it is more<br />
than 8% <strong>of</strong> Turnover.<br />
INDIVIDUAL Rs. 50 lakhs Rs. 85000/- No since his total amount does<br />
not exceed the maximum<br />
amount not chargeable to tax<br />
CIVIL<br />
CONSTRUCTION<br />
PARTNERSHIP<br />
FIRM<br />
Rs. 50 lakhs Rs. 85000/- Yes since his Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it is<br />
below deemed income<br />
prescribed u/s. 44AD<br />
BUILDING<br />
MATERIAL<br />
SUPPLIER<br />
PARTNERSHIP<br />
FIRM<br />
Rs.70 lakhs Rs. 580000/- Yes since his turnover is<br />
exceeding Rs. 60 lakhs not<br />
eligible u/s. 44AD<br />
58
8/23/2011<br />
AN INDIVIDUAL HAVING FOLLOWING 3 PROPRIETORY BUSINESS :-<br />
CIVIL<br />
CONSTRUCTION<br />
RS. 30/- LAKHS Rs.250000/-<br />
No. since Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it is<br />
more than 8% <strong>of</strong> Gross<br />
Turnover<br />
BUILDING<br />
MATERIAL<br />
SUPPLIER<br />
RS. 70/- LAKHS Rs. 600000/- Yes because Turnover is<br />
exceeding Rs. 60 lacs<br />
STONE CRUSHER Rs. 15/- Lakhs Rs. 100000/- Yes because Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it is<br />
less than 8% <strong>of</strong> Turnover<br />
Thus assessee is required to get accounts audited in respect <strong>of</strong> Building Material<br />
supplier business & Stone Crusher Business<br />
AN INDIVIDUAL HAVING FOLLOWING 3 PROPRIETORY BUSINESS :-<br />
CIVIL<br />
CONSTRUCTION<br />
RS. 30/-<br />
LAKHS<br />
Rs.250000/-<br />
No. since Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it is<br />
more than 8% <strong>of</strong> Gross<br />
Turnover<br />
BUILDING<br />
MATERIAL<br />
SUPPLIER<br />
RS. 20/-<br />
LAKHS<br />
Rs. 180000/- No. since Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it is<br />
more than 8% <strong>of</strong> Gross<br />
Turnover<br />
STONE CRUSHER Rs. 35/- Lakhs Rs. 300000/- No. since Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it is<br />
more than 8% <strong>of</strong> Gross<br />
Turnover<br />
Even though aggregate turnover <strong>of</strong> all the business exceeds Rs. 60/- lakhs, Assessee is<br />
not liable to audit u/s. 44AB in respect <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> the business.<br />
59
8/23/2011<br />
ISSUE - 1<br />
Sanjay, a resident individual, carrying on five businesses the<br />
turnover <strong>of</strong> which are as under:<br />
a) Manufacturing Rs 30/- lakhs<br />
b) Service Rs 15/- lakhs<br />
c) Wholesale trading Rs 10/- lakhs<br />
d) Retail trading Rs 5/- lakhs<br />
e) Interest from money lending Rs 5/- lakhs<br />
ISSUE - 2<br />
Deepak & Co, a resident firm having two businesses, the<br />
turnover <strong>of</strong> which is as under:<br />
a) Trading Rs 40/- lakhs<br />
b) Transportation business Rs 30/- lakhs<br />
.<br />
60
8/23/2011<br />
ISSUE - 3<br />
Sachin, a resident individual has given the following details:<br />
a) Pr<strong>of</strong>essional gross receipts Rs 30/- lakhs<br />
b) Manufacturing business turnover Rs 35/- lakhs<br />
ISSUE – 4<br />
XYZ, a resident HUF carrying on trading activities. Total<br />
turnover <strong>of</strong> the business is Rs 40/- lakhs. Pr<strong>of</strong>it as per books is<br />
Rs 6.5 lakhs. However, it wants to file the return <strong>of</strong> income<br />
under section 44AD and claim pr<strong>of</strong>it at 8% i.e. 3.2 lakhs. Can<br />
it do so?<br />
61
8/23/2011<br />
ISSUE – 5<br />
Srinidhi a resident individual covered under section 44AD, for<br />
three consecutive assessment year 2011-12 to 2013-14, WDV<br />
<strong>of</strong> furniture as on 31-03-2010 is Rs 50,000/-. He sells the<br />
furniture for Rs 42,000/- on 01-01-2013.<br />
Compute WDV <strong>of</strong> furniture for assessment year 2013-14?<br />
ISSUE – 6<br />
Mamta an individual resident, assessed under section 44AD<br />
has made the following payments (previous assessment year<br />
assessed under section 44AB):<br />
62
8/23/2011<br />
Case 1:<br />
Cash payment <strong>of</strong> Rs 32,000/- for purchases<br />
Single cash payment <strong>of</strong> Rs 51,000/- for repair expenses<br />
(contract without TDS)<br />
Payment <strong>of</strong> interest <strong>of</strong> Rs 18,000/- without TDS.<br />
Case 2:<br />
The following disallowances were made in the previous<br />
assessment year:<br />
Cash payment exceeding Rs 20,000/- for purchases<br />
Interest expenditure <strong>of</strong> Rs 25,000/- for non-remittance <strong>of</strong> TDS<br />
with in due date. TDS amount being paid in the next year.<br />
63
8/23/2011<br />
ISSUE NO - 7<br />
Sapna is a resident individual assessed under section 44AD<br />
recovered bad debts written-<strong>of</strong>f in earlier years Rs<br />
23,000/-.<br />
ISSUE NO - 8<br />
Mitesh is a resident individual submits the following details:<br />
Net pr<strong>of</strong>it from trading business<br />
(TO Rs 40/- lakhs) 1,80,000.00<br />
Other income 10,000.00<br />
80C deductions to be allowed 35,000.00<br />
Compute his total income, whether section 44AD and section<br />
44AB would be applicable?<br />
64
8/23/2011<br />
ISSUE NO - 9<br />
In case <strong>of</strong> an assessee being an individual or HUF liable to<br />
audit under section 44AB because <strong>of</strong> section 44AD, would<br />
TDS provisions apply to him in the next year?<br />
ISSUE NO – 10<br />
Would audit under section 44AB for the purpose <strong>of</strong> section<br />
44AD be counted in the limit <strong>of</strong> tax audits for tax auditors?<br />
65
8/23/2011<br />
ISSUE NO – 11<br />
Speculation:<br />
The following is the pr<strong>of</strong>it & loss account <strong>of</strong> Mr Ashish, a<br />
resident individual dealing in shares. Whether section 44AD<br />
would apply?<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>it & Loss Account<br />
To Loss on sale <strong>of</strong><br />
shares<br />
20,00,000.00 By Pr<strong>of</strong>it on sale <strong>of</strong><br />
shares<br />
65,00,000.00<br />
To Net pr<strong>of</strong>it 45,00,000.00<br />
65,00,000.00 65,00,000.00<br />
66
8/23/2011<br />
In case <strong>of</strong> a person who is doing speculation business in<br />
shares with no intention <strong>of</strong> taking or giving delivery but<br />
merely earning or losing through squaring up <strong>of</strong><br />
transactions, what will constitute the turnover / gross<br />
receipts <strong>of</strong> the business?<br />
ISSUE NO – 12.<br />
Nimita & Co, a resident firm, submits the following details for<br />
the previous year 2010-11:<br />
Total turnover : 20,00,000.00<br />
Loss from trading business (as per P & L A/c): 1,50,000.00<br />
Salary and interest to partners,<br />
debited to P & L A/c: 1,70,000.00<br />
& 1,15,000.00 respectively<br />
Is section 44AD applicable?<br />
67
8/23/2011<br />
ISSUE NO – 13.<br />
Sneha an individual resident, carrying on trading activity<br />
submits the following:<br />
Compute total income.<br />
Turnover : 40,00,000.00<br />
Net pr<strong>of</strong>it as per normal<br />
provision books : 2,00,000.00<br />
B/f depreciation allowance: 2,00,000.00<br />
B/f business loss AY 08-09: 1,50,000.00<br />
Net pr<strong>of</strong>it as per normal provisions is 5%. Assessee opts<br />
for section 44AD and <strong>of</strong>fers Rs 3,20,000.00 i.e., 8% <strong>of</strong> Rs<br />
40 lakhs as his pr<strong>of</strong>it from business.<br />
Computation <strong>of</strong> income from business?<br />
68
8/23/2011<br />
ISSUE NO. - 14<br />
Mr Prem, an individual resident, submits the following details?<br />
Compute tax liability for assessment year 2011-12?<br />
Income from business to be assessed<br />
under section 44AD 4,00,000.00<br />
Income from other sources 10,00,000.00<br />
Deduction under section 80C 1,00,000.00<br />
Advance tax paid<br />
Nil<br />
Presumptive taxation – Plying,<br />
hiring or leasing goods carriage<br />
<br />
Section 44AE: In case <strong>of</strong> the business <strong>of</strong> plying, hiring or leasing<br />
goods carriages, higher income is to be deemed: - w.e.f.<br />
01.04.2011 (FY 2010-11)<br />
Type <strong>of</strong> vehicle<br />
Heavy goods vehicles<br />
Other than heavy goods<br />
vehicles<br />
Estimated income per vehicle<br />
Rs. 5,000/- per month or part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
month. (Earlier Rs. 3,500/-)<br />
Rs. 4,500/- per month or part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
month. (Earlier Rs. 3,150/-)<br />
69
8/23/2011<br />
FORM NO. 3CD<br />
[See rule 6G(2)]<br />
Statement <strong>of</strong> particulars required to be furnished under<br />
section 44AB <strong>of</strong> the Income-tax Act, 1961<br />
Amendment<br />
Central Law Board <strong>of</strong> Direct Tax has amended tax audit<br />
form no. 3CD vide notification dated 10thAugust, 2006<br />
and 13thApril 2009<br />
70
8/23/2011<br />
PART A<br />
Clause (1 to 6)<br />
1. Name <strong>of</strong> the assessee<br />
2. Address<br />
3. Permanent Account Number<br />
4. Status<br />
5. Previous year ended<br />
6. Assessment year<br />
Issues on Clause(1 to 6)<br />
1) If assessee is proprietor give his/her name along with all<br />
Proprietary Firm‘s name.<br />
2) As per income tax record, if any change in address must be<br />
given.<br />
3) If PAN has been applied and allotment is pending mentioned<br />
not yet allotted.The copy <strong>of</strong> application <strong>of</strong> applied PAN must be<br />
kept by the Auditor.<br />
4) ‗Status‘ means as per sec. 2 (31) <strong>of</strong> Income Tax Act & not<br />
‗residential status‘ [Sec 2(31) – ―Person‖ includes an Individual,<br />
HUF, Firm etc.<br />
5) As per sec. 3 <strong>of</strong> Income Tax Act, previous year should end on<br />
31st March.<br />
6) Assessment year according to the relevant Previous Year<br />
71
8/23/2011<br />
PART B<br />
Clause 7 to 32<br />
Clause 7a. If firm or association <strong>of</strong> persons, indicate names <strong>of</strong><br />
partners/members and their pr<strong>of</strong>it sharing ratio<br />
Clause 7b. If there is any change in the partners or members or<br />
in their pr<strong>of</strong>it sharing ratio since the last date <strong>of</strong> the preceding<br />
year, the particulars <strong>of</strong> such change<br />
72
8/23/2011<br />
ISSUES ON Clause 7:<br />
Ans: (i) What is the date with reference to which the<br />
information in subclause (a) is to be given? Is it on the first<br />
day <strong>of</strong> the previous year or last day there<strong>of</strong>?<br />
Paragraph 18.1, inter alia, clarifies that the details <strong>of</strong> partners<br />
or members during the entire previous year will have to be<br />
furnished. Hence, the names <strong>of</strong> partners <strong>of</strong> the firm or<br />
members <strong>of</strong> the association <strong>of</strong> persons and their pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />
sharing ratios during the entire previous year will have to be<br />
stated and not merely on the first day <strong>of</strong> the previous year or<br />
last day there<strong>of</strong>.<br />
(ii) Should the dates on which the change referred to in sub-clause<br />
(b) occurred, be mentioned?<br />
Paragraph 18.2 clarifies that if there is any change in the partners<br />
<strong>of</strong> the firm or members <strong>of</strong> the association <strong>of</strong> persons or their pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />
or loss sharing ratio, the particulars <strong>of</strong> such change must be stated.<br />
The word "particulars" is significant and it includes the relevant<br />
dates also. The date on which there is a change in the membership<br />
<strong>of</strong> partner(s) <strong>of</strong> a firm or member(s) <strong>of</strong> an association <strong>of</strong> persons<br />
or a change in the pr<strong>of</strong>it sharing ratios (including changes, if any,<br />
in the terms <strong>of</strong> remuneration, interest) is extremely significant data<br />
for the purpose <strong>of</strong> calculating interest, remuneration etc.<br />
73
8/23/2011<br />
Further, once there is a change in the partners/members or their<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>it sharing ratio, it will obviously be reflected either in a fresh<br />
partnership deed or a supplementary partnership deed. Hence, it is<br />
necessary to mention the dates on which such changes occurred.<br />
Even in a case where there is a change in the salary to partners it is<br />
necessary to mention the dates on which such changes have<br />
occurred, as change in salary to partners is as significant as<br />
changes in the pr<strong>of</strong>it sharing ratios among the partners.<br />
(iii) Keeping in view the requirements <strong>of</strong> section 184, is it<br />
necessary to confirm the particulars <strong>of</strong> change with the records <strong>of</strong><br />
Registrar <strong>of</strong> Firm ?<br />
Ans: Paragraph 18.3 gives guidance about the supplementary<br />
documents which the tax auditor may verify in order to satisfy<br />
himself about the genuineness <strong>of</strong> change in the partners or change<br />
in the pr<strong>of</strong>it sharing ratios. Sub point (ii) <strong>of</strong> the above paragraph<br />
points out that the tax auditor may verify whether notice <strong>of</strong><br />
change, if required, has been given to the registrar <strong>of</strong> firms. Thus<br />
the verification <strong>of</strong> records <strong>of</strong> the registrar <strong>of</strong> firms is discretionary<br />
and has to be done in accordance with the pr<strong>of</strong>essional judgement<br />
<strong>of</strong> the tax auditor.<br />
74
8/23/2011<br />
(iv) When a partner in a representative capacity, say, karta <strong>of</strong> HUF,<br />
retires from a firm and is admitted to that firm in his individual<br />
capacity, is it a change in the constitution <strong>of</strong> the firm as envisaged<br />
by this clause ?<br />
Ans: It is a change in the constitution <strong>of</strong> the firm as envisaged by<br />
this clause.<br />
Clause 8a. Nature <strong>of</strong> business or pr<strong>of</strong>ession (if more than one<br />
business or pr<strong>of</strong>ession is carried on during the previous year, nature<br />
<strong>of</strong> every business or pr<strong>of</strong>ession)<br />
For this, reference can be made to the director‘s report and / or<br />
abstract under Part IV <strong>of</strong> Schedule VI.<br />
Clause 8b. If there is any change in the nature <strong>of</strong> business or<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ession, particulars <strong>of</strong> such change<br />
Some examples <strong>of</strong> change in nature:<br />
1. from manufacturer to trader or vice versa<br />
2. change in principal line <strong>of</strong> business In case <strong>of</strong> amalgamation /<br />
demerger, if similar line <strong>of</strong> activity, it would not amount to change<br />
in the nature.<br />
The tax auditor should make proper enquiries, review the minutes<br />
<strong>of</strong> meeting (if made available), director‘s report, etc.<br />
75
8/23/2011<br />
Issues on Clause 8<br />
Permanent discontinuance<strong>of</strong> a particular product<br />
line <strong>of</strong> business need to be reported not temporary<br />
suspension.<br />
―Nature <strong>of</strong> business or Pr<strong>of</strong>ession‖given must be same as<br />
Annexure -I.<br />
Effect on Carry or forward <strong>of</strong> losses :-from A.Y. 2000-01<br />
losses will be carried forward, even if the business or<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ession is discontinued (Sec 72(1)(i))<br />
Clause 9<br />
(a)Whether books <strong>of</strong> account are prescribed under<br />
section 44AA, if yes, list <strong>of</strong> books so prescribed.<br />
(b) Books <strong>of</strong> account maintained. (In case books <strong>of</strong><br />
account are maintained in a computer system, mention<br />
the books <strong>of</strong> account generated by such computer<br />
system)<br />
(c) List <strong>of</strong> books <strong>of</strong> account examined.<br />
76
8/23/2011<br />
Sec 44AA<br />
Specified Pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />
Limit Rs 1,50,000 Receipts<br />
Non Specified Pr<strong>of</strong>ession or<br />
Business<br />
Limit Total income Rs 1,20,000 or<br />
Total Sale Receipts Rs 10,00,000<br />
Exceeds<br />
Does not<br />
Exceeds<br />
Exceeds<br />
Does not<br />
Exceeds<br />
Prescribes<br />
Books Rule 6F<br />
Any books<br />
Any books<br />
No books are<br />
mandatory<br />
Note: Any books means the books so as to enable the<br />
Assessing Officer to compute his total income in<br />
accordance with the provisions <strong>of</strong> this Act.<br />
77
8/23/2011<br />
Cont.<br />
<br />
Prescribed Books:<br />
Cash book<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Journal (if the accounts are kept on mercantile bases)<br />
Ledger<br />
Serial numbered carbon copies <strong>of</strong> the bills and receipts issued<br />
Original purchase bill/payment vouchers.<br />
If person carrying on medical pr<strong>of</strong>ession in addition to above books a daily case<br />
register in form no. 3C. and stock register<br />
[RULE 6F (2) &(3) ]<br />
<br />
Prescribed books <strong>of</strong> account are to be kept at the place <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>ession or principal<br />
place <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>ession if carried at more than one place[s.rule(4)] and for a period <strong>of</strong> 6<br />
years from the end <strong>of</strong> the relevant assessment year. [ rule 6F(5)]<br />
Specified Pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />
Legal, medical, engineering, accountancy, architectural<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ession, technical consultancy, interior decoration or<br />
other notified pr<strong>of</strong>ession.<br />
vide notification : No. SO 17(E), dated 12-1-1977.,<br />
notified pr<strong>of</strong>essions are the pr<strong>of</strong>ession <strong>of</strong> authorised<br />
representative and the pr<strong>of</strong>ession <strong>of</strong> a film artist.<br />
78
8/23/2011<br />
Sec 2(12A) Books or Books <strong>of</strong> account includes:-<br />
Ledgers<br />
Day-Books<br />
Cash books<br />
Account books<br />
Others<br />
Whether kept in the written form or as print-outs <strong>of</strong> data<br />
stored in a floppy, disc, tape or any other form <strong>of</strong> electromagnetic<br />
data storage device.<br />
If case <strong>of</strong> books <strong>of</strong> accounts generated by the Computer<br />
system; the proper print out are mandatory.<br />
ISSUES ON Clause 9:<br />
Books <strong>of</strong> Account:<br />
In case where stock records are not properly maintained<br />
by the assessee due to big volume <strong>of</strong> operations e.g.<br />
particularly in case <strong>of</strong> retail trade how should the tax<br />
auditor report on such imperfect records maintained by<br />
the assesse.<br />
79
8/23/2011<br />
Ans : Paragraph 20.6 advises the assessees engaged in trading/<br />
manufacturing activities to maintain quantitative details<br />
principal items <strong>of</strong> stores, raw material and finished goods.<br />
Inventories normally constitute a significant portion <strong>of</strong> the total<br />
assets particularly in the case <strong>of</strong> manufacturing and trading<br />
entities as well as some service rendering entities. The Auditing<br />
Practices Committee has issued a Guidance Note on Audit <strong>of</strong><br />
(b) Inventories.<br />
Under the paragraph entitled "examination <strong>of</strong> records" it has<br />
been observed in the above Guidance Note that the auditor may<br />
come across cases where the entity does not maintain detailed<br />
stock records" other than basic records relating to purchase and<br />
sales. In such situations, the auditor would have to suitably<br />
extend the extent <strong>of</strong> application <strong>of</strong> the audit procedures in<br />
regard to the inventories.<br />
80
8/23/2011<br />
While giving the particulars in Form NO.3CD the concept <strong>of</strong><br />
materiality has to be kept in mind. If the value <strong>of</strong> inventories<br />
constitutes a very significant portion <strong>of</strong> the total assets and even<br />
then the assessee does not maintain proper stock records, the<br />
auditor will have to exercise his pr<strong>of</strong>essional judgement<br />
whether the absence <strong>of</strong> such records would affect his reporting<br />
requirements.<br />
Clause 10. Whether the pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account includes any<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains assessable on presumptive basis, if yes,<br />
indicate the amount and the relevant sections (Sec 44AD,<br />
44AE, 44AF, 44B, 44BB, 44BBA, 44BBB or any other<br />
relevant section)<br />
81
8/23/2011<br />
SL. NO. Section<br />
Business Covered<br />
1 44AD<br />
Civil construction business<br />
2 44AE Transport business<br />
3 44B<br />
Shipping business <strong>of</strong> a non-resident<br />
Providing service or facilities in connection with, or<br />
supplying plant and machinery on hire used, or to be<br />
used, in the prospecting for, or extraction or<br />
4 44BB<br />
production <strong>of</strong>, mineral oils.<br />
5 44BBA Operation <strong>of</strong> aircraft by non-resident.<br />
This refers to the sections not listed above under<br />
which income may be assessable on presumption<br />
basis like section 44D and sec 115A(1)(b) and will<br />
include any other section that may be enacted in<br />
6 Any other relevant section future for presumptive taxation.<br />
Clause 11a. Method <strong>of</strong> accounting employed in the previous year<br />
‣ Assessee can follow either cash or mercantile system <strong>of</strong><br />
accounting, hybrid system is not permitted.<br />
‣ However, assessee can adopt cash system for one business and<br />
mercantile for other business. But the assessee has to consistently<br />
follow the method <strong>of</strong> accounting.<br />
‣ As per Section 209 <strong>of</strong> the Companies Act 1956, every Company is<br />
required to keep books <strong>of</strong> account under accrual basis. The tax auditor<br />
should refer the notes to the accounts.<br />
‣<br />
82
8/23/2011<br />
Clause 11b. Whether there has been any change in the method<br />
<strong>of</strong> accounting employed vis-à-vis the method employed in the<br />
immediately preceding previous year<br />
‣ The change in the accounting policy may not be a change in<br />
accounting method. Hence, it need not be reported here.<br />
‣ The method <strong>of</strong> accounting can be changed provided changed<br />
method is regular method and the assessee has not merely<br />
abandoned or changed it for a casual period to suit his own<br />
purposes.<br />
Clause 11c. If answer to (b) above is in the affirmative, give details<br />
<strong>of</strong> such change, and the effect there<strong>of</strong> on the pr<strong>of</strong>it or loss<br />
The concept <strong>of</strong> materiality is the basic governing factor. If it is not<br />
possible to quantify effect, disclosure <strong>of</strong> such fact should be stated.<br />
Reference can be made to the notes to the accounts.<br />
Clause 11d. Details <strong>of</strong> deviation, if any, in the method <strong>of</strong> accounting<br />
employed in the previous year from accounting standards prescribed<br />
under section 145 and the effect there on the pr<strong>of</strong>it or loss<br />
U/s 145(2)- Accounting Standard to be followed by all assessee<br />
following mercantile system <strong>of</strong> accounting .<br />
The Central Government has notified two Accounting Standards [CBDT<br />
C.No. 9949 dated July25,1996]<br />
(A) Accounting Standard – I<br />
Relating to ― Disclosure <strong>of</strong> Accounting Policies‖.<br />
B) Accounting Standard – II<br />
Relating to Disclosure <strong>of</strong> ―Prior Period and Extraordinary Items<br />
and changes in Accounting Policies‖.<br />
83
8/23/2011<br />
Reporting <strong>of</strong> treatment <strong>of</strong> Excise Duty, VAT etc<br />
Clause 12<br />
12(a) Method <strong>of</strong> valuation <strong>of</strong> closing stock employed in the<br />
previous year<br />
(b) Details <strong>of</strong> deviation, if any, from the method <strong>of</strong> valuation<br />
prescribed under section 145A, and the effect there<strong>of</strong> on the pr<strong>of</strong>it or<br />
loss.<br />
<br />
<br />
Clause 21: Residuary note<br />
State whether sales tax, customs duty, excise duty or any other<br />
indirect tax, levy, cess, impost etc. is passed through the pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss<br />
account.<br />
Clause 22(a):<br />
22. (a) Amount <strong>of</strong> Modified Value Added Tax credits availed <strong>of</strong><br />
or utilised during the previous year and its treatment in the pr<strong>of</strong>it and<br />
loss account and treatment <strong>of</strong> outstanding Modified Value Added Tax<br />
credits in the accounts.<br />
Clause 12a. Method <strong>of</strong> valuation <strong>of</strong> closing stock employed<br />
in the previous year<br />
The tax auditor should refer the method <strong>of</strong> valuation in<br />
significant accounting policies in the notes to the accounts.<br />
The word the ―Closing Stock‖ includes all items <strong>of</strong> inventory.<br />
84
8/23/2011<br />
Clause 12b. Details <strong>of</strong> deviation, if any, from the method <strong>of</strong> valuation<br />
prescribed under section 145A, and the effect there<strong>of</strong> on the pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />
or loss<br />
Section 145A has come into force from A.Y 1999-2000. It is not<br />
necessary to change the method <strong>of</strong> valuation <strong>of</strong> purchase / sale and<br />
inventory regularly employed in books <strong>of</strong> account.<br />
The adjustments provided under the section can be made while<br />
computing the income for the return. The adjustments will affect<br />
opening stock, purchases, sales and closing stock. The adjustments<br />
are as follows:<br />
any tax, duty, cess or fee actually paid or incurred on inputs, sales,<br />
inventory should be added, if not already added (to gross up)<br />
Issues on Clause 12(a) :<br />
Valuation <strong>of</strong> Closing Stock:<br />
Where an assessee is following cash system <strong>of</strong><br />
accounting, should he account for the closing stock or<br />
alternatively, can the entire purchases be claimed as<br />
an expense?<br />
85
8/23/2011<br />
Ans: Even if the assessee is following cash system <strong>of</strong><br />
accounting, he should account for the closing stock as per the<br />
principles laid down in Accounting standard – 2 (Revised)<br />
valuation <strong>of</strong> inventories. The trading account has to be<br />
prepared and the opening stock, purchases and closing stock<br />
have to be kept in mind while making valuation <strong>of</strong> closing<br />
stock.<br />
In this connection, a reference may be made to the decision<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Supreme Court in CIT v. A. Krishnaswami Mudaliar<br />
(53 ITR 122, 132), wherein it was held ―But whatever may<br />
be the system, whether it is cash or mercantile,…, in a<br />
trading venture it would be impossible accurately to assess<br />
the true pr<strong>of</strong>its without taking into account the value <strong>of</strong> the<br />
stock in trade at the beginning and at the end <strong>of</strong> the year‘.<br />
In clause 3(i) <strong>of</strong> the old Form No. 3CD, reference<br />
was to ―opening and closing stock-in-trade‖. In sub<br />
clause (a) <strong>of</strong> clause 12 <strong>of</strong> revised Form No. 3CD, the<br />
reference is to closing stock . What is the significance<br />
<strong>of</strong> this change?<br />
86
8/23/2011<br />
Ans: The significance <strong>of</strong> this change is explained in paragraph 23.3.<br />
<strong>of</strong> guidance note on tax audit revised 2005 edition. In clause 3(i)<br />
<strong>of</strong> the old Form No. 3CD reference was to ―opening and closing<br />
stock-in-trade‘. In sub-clause (a) <strong>of</strong> clause 12 <strong>of</strong> revised Form No.<br />
3CD, the reference is to ―closing stock‖. The expression ―stock-intrade‖<br />
means finished goods and raw materials. Since subclause(b)<br />
refers to section 145A where the term ― inventories‖ is<br />
used, the term ―closing stock‖ will include all items <strong>of</strong> inventories.<br />
AS-2 defines the term ―inventories‖ to include finished goods, raw<br />
material maintenance supplies, consumables and loose tools.<br />
Therefore, method <strong>of</strong> valuation <strong>of</strong> items <strong>of</strong> closing inventories will<br />
have to be given under sub-clause (a).<br />
Issues on Clause – 12(b)<br />
Please clarify whether adjustment <strong>of</strong> Cenvat against<br />
excise duty payable is considered as ―paid‖ for the<br />
purposes <strong>of</strong> section 43B?<br />
87
8/23/2011<br />
Ans : Yes, adjustment <strong>of</strong> Cenvat against excise duty<br />
payable is considered as ―actually paid‖ for the<br />
purpose <strong>of</strong> allowance under section 43B. It is a<br />
constructive payment. Reference can also be made to<br />
the Hon‘ble Supreme Court decision in standard<br />
Triumph Motor Company Limited v CIT 201 ITR 391.<br />
Section 145A is supposed to be tax neutral This<br />
argument does not hold good in a case where excise<br />
duty is payable by a manufacturer in a financial year<br />
on account <strong>of</strong> his sales exceeding the basic exemption<br />
limit, but in the next year the turnover is within the<br />
basic exemption limit and the unit is not liable to pay<br />
the excise duty. In such a situation, how can the credit<br />
<strong>of</strong> excise duty on closing stock be claimed?<br />
88
8/23/2011<br />
Ans: In the first year debit <strong>of</strong> excise duty adjustment <strong>of</strong> excise<br />
duty to the closing stock would <strong>of</strong>fset each other and as such<br />
there would be no impact on the pr<strong>of</strong>it as per accounts.<br />
However, the debit on account <strong>of</strong> excise duty would be<br />
disallowed under section 43B. In the next year the opening<br />
stock would be closing stock <strong>of</strong> the first year, duly adjusted<br />
with excise duty. The earlier year‘s excise duty debit would be<br />
credited to pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account <strong>of</strong> the next year. However,<br />
this credit would not be taxable in view <strong>of</strong> disallowance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
amount in the first year under section 43B.<br />
It is also significant to note that paragraph 13 <strong>of</strong> AS 4 –<br />
Contingencies and events occurring after the balance sheet date<br />
provides that assets and liabilities should be adjusted for events<br />
occurring after the balance sheet date that provide additional<br />
evidence to assist the estimation <strong>of</strong> amounts relating to<br />
conditions existing at the balance sheet date.<br />
89
8/23/2011<br />
Liability on closing stock <strong>of</strong> finished goods are<br />
provided The goods are yet in the godown. There is a<br />
fire and goods are destroyed. Is the assessee required<br />
to include the amount <strong>of</strong> excise duty in the valuation<br />
<strong>of</strong> stock for the purpose <strong>of</strong> section 145A?<br />
Ans: Excise is a duty on manufacture <strong>of</strong> goods and the<br />
liability for duty arise as soon as such goods are<br />
manufactured. The duty payable on such goods will<br />
have to be included for the purpose <strong>of</strong> valuation <strong>of</strong><br />
closing stock. If such goods are lost or destroyed in<br />
storage, remission <strong>of</strong> duty can be given by the<br />
commissioner on application. However, once the goods<br />
are cleared from the factory and subsequently they are<br />
destroyed there is no provision for granting refund <strong>of</strong><br />
duty.<br />
90
8/23/2011<br />
During the year after announcement <strong>of</strong> AS-2 as<br />
mandatory, Cenvat has been excluded for the<br />
purpose <strong>of</strong> valuation <strong>of</strong> opening stock though<br />
Cenvat portion was considered for valuation <strong>of</strong><br />
closing stock <strong>of</strong> last year. Since clause 12(b) asks<br />
for details <strong>of</strong> deviation, if any, from section 145A,<br />
should the deviation for valuation <strong>of</strong> opening stock<br />
be given? Alternatively please clarify whether this<br />
issue is covered in clause 11(d).<br />
Ans: Yes, the excise duty should be included in the<br />
valuation <strong>of</strong> stock in order to comply with provisions <strong>of</strong><br />
section 145A. Once the statutory adjustments are shown<br />
as part <strong>of</strong> computation <strong>of</strong> income, no separate<br />
disclosure is necessary under sub-clause 12(a). The<br />
issue is not covered by clause 11(d) since 11(d) requires<br />
reporting <strong>of</strong> deviation, if any, in the method <strong>of</strong><br />
accounting employed in the previous year from<br />
accounting standard prescribed under section 145.<br />
91
8/23/2011<br />
While giving effect <strong>of</strong> deviation from section 145A, as per<br />
the Guidance Note excise duty payable on finished goods<br />
has to be covered in the information related to section 43B<br />
i.e. it is allowable as deduction on payment basis. Kindly<br />
elaborate<br />
Ans: The component <strong>of</strong> excise duty on finished goods forms<br />
part <strong>of</strong> value <strong>of</strong> stock in trade. This is because the moment<br />
the manufacture <strong>of</strong> the goods is complete in all respects and<br />
ready for dispatch the liability <strong>of</strong> excise duty arises. The<br />
deduction for excise duty is allowed only when the excise<br />
duty on such goods is paid on the finished stocks cleared<br />
and/or dispatched. The information relating to section 43B is<br />
only to see that claim is not made on the basis <strong>of</strong> advance<br />
payments made without clearance and/ or dispatch <strong>of</strong> goods.<br />
92
8/23/2011<br />
Subsequent to the year end but before furnishing <strong>of</strong> return, excise<br />
duty <strong>of</strong> an amount which is more than the payable amount, has<br />
been paid. However all the items which formed part <strong>of</strong> the closing<br />
stock has not been cleared.<br />
Ans: Section 43B is a provision intended to disallow certain<br />
items <strong>of</strong> expenditure which are otherwise admissible on<br />
account <strong>of</strong> non-payment within the stipulated date. It cannot<br />
be used to allow an item <strong>of</strong> expenditure which is not relating<br />
to the year merely on account payment made. Hence, excise<br />
duty paid in excess <strong>of</strong> amount payable cannot be claimed as<br />
deduction. Reference to Gopikrishna Granites India Ltd., v.<br />
DCIT 251 ITR 337 (AP) and Hindustan Liver Limited v.<br />
V.K. Pandey, JCIT, 251 ITR 209 (Bom) can be relevant in<br />
this regard.<br />
93
8/23/2011<br />
Clause 12A- Conversion <strong>of</strong> Capital Asset into Stock in Trade at<br />
fair market value: Section 45(2)<br />
Give the following particulars <strong>of</strong> the capital asset converted into<br />
stock-in-trade: -<br />
(a) Description <strong>of</strong> capital asset,<br />
(b) Date <strong>of</strong> acquisition;<br />
(c) Cost <strong>of</strong> acquisition;<br />
(d) Amount at which the asset is converted into stock-in-trade<br />
Issues on Clause – 12A<br />
This clause is inserted to keep a track record <strong>of</strong> transactions<br />
related to conversion <strong>of</strong> capital asset into stock-in-trade.<br />
Such conversion is treated as transfer u/s 2(47)<br />
U/s 45(2) notional capital gain arise from such transfer and<br />
chargeable to tax in the year in which such stock-in-trade is sold.<br />
No requirement <strong>of</strong> details <strong>of</strong> taxability <strong>of</strong> capital gain or business<br />
income from such deemed transfer.<br />
Follow AS-2 for valuation <strong>of</strong> stock-in-trade<br />
Follow AS-10 for valuation <strong>of</strong> fixed assets.<br />
Follow AS-22 for provision <strong>of</strong> I.Tax as temporary timing<br />
difference.<br />
Sec 47 & 47A also to be kept in mind.<br />
94
8/23/2011<br />
Cost <strong>of</strong> capital asset in case <strong>of</strong>:<br />
Purchase–From invoice, Books etc<br />
Self –constructed–directly related cost<br />
Acquired in exchange–FMV or Net Book value <strong>of</strong><br />
asset given up<br />
Acquired by way <strong>of</strong> inheritance–In this case if no<br />
evidence exist –Auditor should rely upon the report <strong>of</strong><br />
the experts such as valuers.<br />
Information under item no. 12A should be necessary not<br />
only in the year <strong>of</strong> conversion but also in the year <strong>of</strong> sale<br />
<strong>of</strong> relevant stock in trade. Since sec. 45(2) provides only<br />
for the computation <strong>of</strong> capital gain in the year <strong>of</strong><br />
conversion but the due date <strong>of</strong> payment <strong>of</strong> tax is in the<br />
year <strong>of</strong> sale <strong>of</strong> such converted stock-in-trade.<br />
95
8/23/2011<br />
The legislation has not visualized the situation where<br />
stock in trade is to be converted into capital asset. In<br />
the absence <strong>of</strong> a specific provision, the formula which<br />
is favorable to assessee should be accepted. (ITA<br />
6374/MUM/2004, ACIT v Bright Star Inv P Ltd)<br />
Clause 13. Amounts not credited to the pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account,<br />
being:<br />
a. the items falling within the scope <strong>of</strong> section 28<br />
Section 28 prescribes certain items to be treated as income for e.g.<br />
sum received under Keyman insurance policy including the sum<br />
allocated by way <strong>of</strong> bonus on such policy, etc.<br />
Under this clause various amounts falling within the scope <strong>of</strong><br />
section 28 which are not credited to the pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account are<br />
to be stated.<br />
The information is to be given with reference to the entries in the<br />
books <strong>of</strong> accounts and records made available to the tax auditor.<br />
96
8/23/2011<br />
b. the pr<strong>of</strong>orma credits, drawbacks, refund <strong>of</strong> duty <strong>of</strong><br />
customs or excise or service tax, or refund <strong>of</strong> sales tax or<br />
value added tax, where such credits, drawbacks or<br />
refunds are admitted as due by the authorities concerned<br />
The tax auditor has to examine all relevant correspondence,<br />
records and evidence in order to determine whether any<br />
claim has been admitted as due within the relevant previous<br />
year.<br />
If cash system is followed, even if it is admitted within the<br />
previous year, but not actually received during the previous<br />
year, it need not be reported here.<br />
c. Escalations claims accepted during the previous year<br />
Escalation claims would normally arise pursuant to a contract.<br />
Only those claims, to which the other party has signified<br />
unconditional acceptance need to be reported here.<br />
d. Any other item <strong>of</strong> income<br />
Any other items which tax auditor considers as income based on<br />
verification <strong>of</strong> records, but not credited to Pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account<br />
to be reported under this clause.<br />
In giving details under sub clauses (c ) and (d), due regard should<br />
be given to AS – 9 Revenue Recognition.<br />
97
8/23/2011<br />
e. Capital receipt, if any<br />
The auditor should refer to Cash flow statement for this purpose and<br />
exercise his pr<strong>of</strong>essional expertise and judgment.<br />
Some examples are :<br />
1. Capital subsidy received in the form <strong>of</strong> government grants<br />
which are in the nature <strong>of</strong> promoters‘ contribution.<br />
2. Government grants in relation to a specific fixed asset where<br />
such grant has been shown as a deduction from gross value <strong>of</strong><br />
fixed assets.<br />
3. Compensation for surrendering certain rights.<br />
4. Pr<strong>of</strong>it on sale <strong>of</strong> fixed assets / investments to the extent not<br />
credited to the pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account.<br />
Clause 13:<br />
Amounts not credited to the Pr<strong>of</strong>it & Loss Account:<br />
Nowadays many companies are organizing foreign<br />
tours for their dealers if they achieve targeted sales. In<br />
such situations either the proprietor dealer or the<br />
partner <strong>of</strong> the dealer firm or the director <strong>of</strong> the dealer<br />
company may avail <strong>of</strong> the foreign tour, What are the<br />
duties <strong>of</strong> the tax auditor in this regard.<br />
98
8/23/2011<br />
Ans : Clause (iv) <strong>of</strong> section 28 brings to charge the value <strong>of</strong> any<br />
perquisite or benefit convertible into money or not arising from<br />
the exercise <strong>of</strong> business or pr<strong>of</strong>ession. Such benefit might have not<br />
been credited to the pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account or in the books <strong>of</strong><br />
account.<br />
The tax auditor is required to report in regard to items falling<br />
within the scope <strong>of</strong> section 28 whether or not they are entered into<br />
the books <strong>of</strong> account. If the books <strong>of</strong> account or any other<br />
supporting documents or records reflect or indicate enjoyment <strong>of</strong><br />
some such benefit, he may make further inquiries. Based on such<br />
inquiries, in exercise <strong>of</strong> his pr<strong>of</strong>essional judgment, he may report<br />
about such benefit appropriately. Where circumstances warrant it<br />
may be clarified that the information is not necessarily exhaustive<br />
and is given on the basis <strong>of</strong> the knowledge he acquired in the<br />
course <strong>of</strong> audit carried out in accordance with the normally<br />
accepted auditing practices.<br />
In case <strong>of</strong> an individual assessee certain incomes are<br />
exempt like<br />
a) share <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it from partnership firm – exempt u/s. 10(2A)<br />
b) income <strong>of</strong> minor children exempt u/s. 10(32) should such<br />
income also be disclosed under clause 13(d)<br />
99
8/23/2011<br />
Ans : Any income which could be ascertained from the<br />
books <strong>of</strong> account, records and information made<br />
available to the tax auditor has to be reported.<br />
However, the tax auditor should clearly state that such<br />
incomes are excludible under the relevant provisions<br />
<strong>of</strong> section 10.<br />
Clause 14.Particulars <strong>of</strong> depreciation allowable as per the<br />
Income tax Act, 1961 in respect <strong>of</strong> each asset or block <strong>of</strong> assets,<br />
as the case may be in the following form:<br />
a) Description <strong>of</strong> asset/block <strong>of</strong> assets<br />
b) Rate <strong>of</strong> depreciation<br />
c) Actual cost or the WDV as the case may be.<br />
d) Additions/deductions during the year with dates; in case <strong>of</strong> any<br />
addition <strong>of</strong> an asset, date put to use; including adjustments on<br />
account <strong>of</strong> Modvat, change in rate <strong>of</strong> exchange <strong>of</strong> currency,<br />
subsidy or grant or reimbursement, by whatever name called.<br />
e) Depreciation allowable<br />
f) Written down value at the end <strong>of</strong> the year<br />
100
8/23/2011<br />
Issues on Clause -14<br />
It is compulsory for all assessee to claim depreciation or<br />
additional depreciation in calculating taxable income otherwise no<br />
deduction will be allowed & WDV will be treated as reduced –<br />
Explanation 5 to Sec 32 (w.e.f A.Y. 2002-03).<br />
‗Allowable‖implies permissible deduction under provision <strong>of</strong> Act<br />
and Rules.<br />
―Used‖means actual use and is not kept ready for use.<br />
Assets used partly for Business purpose, deduction u/s 32(1)<br />
restricted to proportionate part.<br />
In clause 14 d(ii) adjustment is contemplated u/s 43A & AS-11 .<br />
U/s 43A deduction on cash basis but AS-11 (revised) deduction<br />
on accrual basis.<br />
No amendment is made in this respect in Schedule VI & in form<br />
3CD.<br />
Depreciation is not allowed on an amount equivalent to<br />
CENVAT credit claimed and allowed.<br />
Depreciation is allowed on ―Actual Cost‖-term defined<br />
u/s 43(1) <strong>of</strong> I.T. Act.<br />
An assessee can claim depreciation on actual cost even if<br />
he follows Cash method <strong>of</strong> accounting.<br />
Subsidy received over & above <strong>of</strong> WDV <strong>of</strong> block <strong>of</strong> asset<br />
in the absence <strong>of</strong> specific provisions not taxable.<br />
The interest relatable to any period after such asset is<br />
first put to use is not a part <strong>of</strong> actual cost.<br />
101
8/23/2011<br />
Sub clause (iia) to Sec 32(1) inserted by Finance Act,2002<br />
w.e.f A.Y. 2003-04 to provide additional depreciation on<br />
fulfillment <strong>of</strong> prescribed conditions.<br />
W.e.f 2006-07 additional depreciation allowed to all the<br />
assessee engaged in the business <strong>of</strong> manufacturing or<br />
production <strong>of</strong> any article or thing in respect <strong>of</strong> New<br />
machinery or Plant installed on or after 31stday <strong>of</strong><br />
March,2005.<br />
Depreciation debited to P&L a/c as per requirement <strong>of</strong><br />
Schedule VI not reported under clause –14.<br />
In case <strong>of</strong> dispute between assessee, department &<br />
Auditor regarding classification <strong>of</strong> assets, rate <strong>of</strong><br />
depreciation etc in earlier year a suitable disclosure is<br />
required.<br />
Please clarify the basis upon which depreciation will<br />
be allowed under cash system . Will it be allowed on<br />
full cost or will it be limited to the actual payment<br />
made during the relevant previous year?<br />
102
8/23/2011<br />
Ans: For the purpose <strong>of</strong> calculating the depreciation allowable<br />
under the Income-tax Act the basis will be the actual cost as<br />
defined in section 43(1) <strong>of</strong> the Income-tax Act. Accordingly,<br />
even if an assessee is following cash method <strong>of</strong> accounting<br />
depreciation has to be allowed on the full actual cost even if<br />
only a portion <strong>of</strong> it might have been paid in cash during the<br />
relevant previous year. It is because <strong>of</strong> the fact that when the<br />
asset is used in business, the whole <strong>of</strong> the asset is used and not a<br />
part proportionate to the cash paid.<br />
(a) In the circumstances where depreciation has not<br />
been claimed in the accounts and is not likely to be<br />
claimed in the return also, should the tax auditor state<br />
the particulars <strong>of</strong> depreciation under clause 14 or not?<br />
b) The assessee wants to claim less depreciation than<br />
allowable under Income tax Act. It is permissible?<br />
What is the duty <strong>of</strong> the tax auditor in this regard?<br />
103
8/23/2011<br />
Ans : That the Finance Act, 2001, with effect from 1st April<br />
2002, has inserted Explanation 5 below section 32 (1) to<br />
provide that the provisions <strong>of</strong> sub section (1) shall apply<br />
whether or not the assessee has claimed the deduction in<br />
respect <strong>of</strong> depreciation in computing total income. In other<br />
words, the effect <strong>of</strong> the Explanation is that the depreciation<br />
would be considered in computing total income irrespective<br />
<strong>of</strong> the fact whether a claim is made or not. Further, it is not<br />
open to an assessee to claim lesser depreciation than the<br />
prescribed rate.<br />
Where, however, an assessee chooses to claim depreciation at a<br />
lower rate or does not claim or does not intend to claim<br />
depreciation, the tax auditor, as such, does not have to calculate the<br />
depreciation on his own. It would be sufficient for him to state in<br />
the report that the assessee does not intend to claim the<br />
depreciation or has claimed depreciation at a lower rate and give<br />
the necessary facts, if any, relating thereto. There may also be a<br />
situation where the assessee does not want to claim depreciation<br />
but is willing to give all the particulars necessary for calculating<br />
depreciation. The tax auditor in that case can compute the<br />
allowable depreciation and provide the required information under<br />
the clause.<br />
104
8/23/2011<br />
Under Explanation 10 to section 43(1) any subsidy<br />
received from Government towards an asset should be<br />
reduced from the cost <strong>of</strong> the asset. What is the position if<br />
in a given case, a subsidy <strong>of</strong> Rs. 3/- lacs is received<br />
during the year (against a claim made few years ago) in<br />
respect <strong>of</strong> an asset with a present WDV <strong>of</strong> Rs. 2/- lacs?<br />
Indicate the treatment to be accorded to the excess<br />
subsidy <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1/- lac over the WDV.<br />
Ans : The Subsidy received should be reduced from the WDV<br />
so as to reduce the balance in the block to Zero. The<br />
excess, if any, over and above WDV does not appear to be<br />
taxable in absence <strong>of</strong> a specific provision to that effect.<br />
Section 50 also does not appear to be attracted as there is<br />
no transfer <strong>of</strong> the asset.<br />
105
8/23/2011<br />
Clause 15. Amounts admissible under sections<br />
33AB, 33ABA, 35, 35ABB, 35AC, 35CCA, 35CCB, 35D,<br />
35DD, 35DDA, 35E<br />
a. debited to the pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account (showing the amount debited and<br />
deduction allowable under each section separately;<br />
b. not debited to the pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account<br />
• Section 33AB: Tea / C<strong>of</strong>fee / Rubber Development Account<br />
• Section 33ABA: Site Restoration Fund<br />
• Section 35: Expenditure on Scientific Research<br />
• Section 35ABB: Expenditure for obtaining license to operate telecom services<br />
• Section 35AC: Expenditure on eligible projects/schemes<br />
• Section 35CCA: Expenditure by way <strong>of</strong> payments to associations and<br />
institutions for carrying out rural development programmes<br />
• Section 35D: Amortization <strong>of</strong> certain preliminary expenses<br />
• Section 35E: Deduction for expenditure on prospecting etc. for certain minerals<br />
Clause 16a. Any sum paid to an employee as bonus or commission<br />
for services rendered, where such sum was otherwise payable to him<br />
as pr<strong>of</strong>its or dividend<br />
‣If any such sum is paid, this would not be normally allowed as<br />
deduction<br />
‣The requirement is only in respect <strong>of</strong> disclosure, the tax auditor is<br />
not expected to express an opinion about the allowability or<br />
otherwise<br />
‣The tax auditor should verify the contract with the employees so as<br />
to ascertain the nature <strong>of</strong> payments<br />
106
8/23/2011<br />
Clause 16b. Any sum received from employees towards contributions to<br />
any provident fund or superannuation fund or any other fund mentioned in<br />
section 2(24)(x); and due date for payment and the actual date <strong>of</strong> payment<br />
to the concerned authorities under section 36(1)(va)<br />
‣ Deduction <strong>of</strong> such sums received from the employees is allowed, if it is<br />
credited by assessee to the account <strong>of</strong> employees on or before the due date<br />
as per the applicable law.<br />
‣ Otherwise, the same is treated as his income under Section 2(24)(x)<br />
‣ Tax auditor should get a list <strong>of</strong> various contributions recovered from the<br />
employees and verify the actual payments from the evidence available.<br />
Clause 16:<br />
Bonus, Commission, PF recoveries etc.:<br />
M/s. A Pvt. Ltd pays service charges to its Director<br />
Mr.Z, amounting to Rs. 1 lakh. Mr. Z is holding 50%<br />
<strong>of</strong> the shares in M/s. A Pvt. Ltd. Please clarify<br />
whether the same has to be reported under this clause?<br />
107
8/23/2011<br />
Ans: It is not clear whether Mr. Z is an employee <strong>of</strong> the<br />
company Assuming that he is also an employee <strong>of</strong> the company,<br />
if it established that the amount <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1 lakh in sum and<br />
substance constituted dividend, the tax auditor has to report<br />
under sub-clause (a). However, if such service charges are<br />
payable to Mr. z for services rendered to the company and have<br />
no connection with the appropriation <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>its in any manner,<br />
there is no reporting requirement.<br />
The assessee applied for a P.F. No. in time but the<br />
same was not allotted within a reasonable time due<br />
to departmental delay. The assessee duly made a<br />
provision for the contribution by the employer in<br />
its pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account and balance sheet. But<br />
the same could not be remitted to the authorities<br />
because <strong>of</strong> the non allotment <strong>of</strong> P.F. No. Please<br />
clarify the duty <strong>of</strong> the tax auditor in this regard.<br />
108
8/23/2011<br />
Ans: The objective <strong>of</strong> Sub-clause (b) is to get information in<br />
respect <strong>of</strong> sums recovered from employees towards<br />
provident fund contributions etc. and the dates on which<br />
such contributions were remitted to the statutory<br />
authorities. This information is necessary to determine the<br />
allowability <strong>of</strong> the payment <strong>of</strong> such contributions under the<br />
provisions <strong>of</strong> section 36(1)(va). In the given issue the<br />
assessee has not remitted the contribution to the statutory<br />
authorities, whatever be the reasons therefore. The tax<br />
auditor has indicate the factual position in this regard.<br />
Please clarify whether the grace period <strong>of</strong> 5days<br />
should be considered while determining due date for<br />
payment <strong>of</strong> PF, ESIC contributions for reporting under<br />
section 36(1)(va) read with sections 2(24) (x) and 43 -<br />
B<br />
109
8/23/2011<br />
Ans: The following extracts from the judgement <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in Hunsur Plywood<br />
Works Ltd., V. Deputy Commission <strong>of</strong> Income-tax<br />
(1995) 54 ITD 394 will make the position clear.<br />
―Paragraph 38 <strong>of</strong> the Employees‘ Provident Funds<br />
Scheme, 1952 says that the amounts under<br />
consideration in respect <strong>of</strong> wages <strong>of</strong> the employees for<br />
any particular month shall be paid within 15 days <strong>of</strong><br />
the close <strong>of</strong> every month.<br />
Clause (iii) <strong>of</strong> CPFC's Circular NO.E. 128(1) 60-111 dated 19-3-<br />
1964 as modified by Circular No. E. 11/128 (section 14-B<br />
Amendment)/73 dated 24-10-1973 allows five days <strong>of</strong> grace<br />
period to the employers for payment <strong>of</strong> provident fund<br />
contribution, administrative charges and inspection charges. The<br />
said Circular also states that if payment be made within the said<br />
period <strong>of</strong> grace, no damages as per section 14-B <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Employees's Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions<br />
Act, 1952 shall be levied. Furthermore, our attention has also<br />
been drawn to CPFC's Circular No. E.128(1 )60-IV dated 29-4-<br />
1967 in clause (iii) <strong>of</strong> which it has been stated that the Central<br />
Board <strong>of</strong> Trustees at its meeting on 13-4-1967 agreed that if<br />
payment was made within grace period already allowed by it,<br />
then such payments should not be counted as default even for<br />
the purpose <strong>of</strong> counting the number <strong>of</strong> defaults ……(Page 399)<br />
110
8/23/2011<br />
Thus, we find that from strict judicial angle, the period or days <strong>of</strong><br />
grace would seem to be falling within a twilight region. The<br />
period certainly follows the exact due date but at the same time<br />
no action by the other side is possible within the said period<br />
except for registering a protest. Since the present issue is<br />
required to be resolved from practical angle, as discussed by us<br />
above, we are required to examine the consequences <strong>of</strong> making<br />
<strong>of</strong> payment <strong>of</strong> the employees' contribution to the EPF etc., within<br />
five days' period <strong>of</strong> grace.<br />
We find that if an employer makes payment within such period <strong>of</strong><br />
grace, not only is he not liable to pay any damages in accordance<br />
with the Employees' Provident Fund Scheme and the relevant<br />
Act, but by virtue <strong>of</strong> the Circular dated 29-4-1967 as mentioned<br />
above, he will also not be treated to be in default. Hence, we<br />
ultimately hold that from practical point <strong>of</strong> view, the five days'<br />
period <strong>of</strong> grace after 15th <strong>of</strong> the succeeding months is to be<br />
considered merely as an extension <strong>of</strong> the early 15 days and all the<br />
consequences <strong>of</strong> making payment within the said 15 days should<br />
be considered to follow if the payment be made within the grace<br />
period following the said period <strong>of</strong> 15 days.― (Page 400).<br />
Also refer to CIT v. Salem Cooperative Spinning Mills Ltd.<br />
[2002J 258 ITR 360 (Mad).<br />
111
8/23/2011<br />
Clause 17. Amounts debited to Pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account, being :-<br />
Clause 17a. Expenditure <strong>of</strong> Capital nature<br />
‣ Capital expenditure, if any, debited to the pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account<br />
to be disclosed stating the amounts under various heads separately<br />
‣Tax auditor needs to scrutinize records and obtain information and<br />
make necessary inquiries in this behalf<br />
‣ General tests should be applied to determine whether a particular<br />
expenditure is <strong>of</strong> a capital nature i.e.<br />
• where it brings into existence an asset or<br />
• advantage <strong>of</strong> enduring benefit, or<br />
• whether it relates to the frame work <strong>of</strong> the assessee‘s<br />
business etc.<br />
Clause 17b. Expenditure <strong>of</strong> personal nature<br />
‣ Tax auditor needs to scrutinize the ledger to verify whether any<br />
expenses <strong>of</strong> personal nature have been incurred by the assessee.<br />
‣ Section 227(1A) requires the auditor to inquire whether personal<br />
expenses have been charged to the revenue account.<br />
‣Note: According to the information and explanation given by the<br />
assessee, no personal expenses have been debited to the pr<strong>of</strong>it and<br />
loss account other than those payable under contractual<br />
obligations or in accordance with the generally accepted business<br />
practice.<br />
112
8/23/2011<br />
Clause 17c. Expenditure on advertisement in any souvenir,<br />
brochure, tract, pamphlet, or the like, published by a political party<br />
‣If there is any such expenditure debited to the pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss<br />
account, the same will be disallowed under section 37(2B) and has<br />
to be reported under the above clause.<br />
‣For this purpose the tax auditor should scrutinize the ledger<br />
accounts and make enquiries in this behalf.<br />
Clause 17d. Expenditure incurred at clubs-<br />
(i) As entrance fees and subscriptions<br />
(ii) As cost for club services and facilities used<br />
‣ The expenditure may be incurred for directors, employees,<br />
partner, proprietors.<br />
‣ The fact that whether they are <strong>of</strong> personal nature or incurred<br />
in the course <strong>of</strong> business should be ascertained. If they are <strong>of</strong><br />
personal nature, they should be shown under clause 17b.<br />
‣The tax auditor should make a close scrutiny <strong>of</strong> the ledger in<br />
such cases<br />
113
8/23/2011<br />
Clause 17e.<br />
i. Expenditure by way <strong>of</strong> penalty or fine for violation <strong>of</strong> any law<br />
for the time being in force<br />
ii.<br />
iii.<br />
Any other penalty or fine<br />
Expenditure incurred for any purpose which is an <strong>of</strong>fence or<br />
which is prohibited by law<br />
‣ Tax auditor should obtain in writing the details <strong>of</strong> all payments<br />
made by way <strong>of</strong> penalty or fine from the assessee and how such<br />
amounts have been dealt in the books <strong>of</strong> accounts<br />
‣ The tax auditor is not required to express any opinion as to allow<br />
ability or otherwise <strong>of</strong> amount.<br />
‣ It does not cover payment for contractual breach.<br />
Note: The assessee has represented that, the assessee has not<br />
incurred:<br />
i. any expenditure by way <strong>of</strong> penalty or fine for violation <strong>of</strong><br />
any law for the time being in force;<br />
ii.<br />
any other penalty or fine; and<br />
iii.<br />
any expenditure for any purpose which is an <strong>of</strong>fence or<br />
which is prohibited by law.<br />
114
8/23/2011<br />
Clause 17f. Amounts inadmissible under section 40(a)<br />
It basically includes :<br />
‣ Interest, royalty, fees for technical services or any other sum<br />
payable outside India or in India to a non resident or a foreign<br />
company<br />
‣ Interest, commission or brokerage, rent, royalty, fees for<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional or technical services, payments to resident<br />
contractors/subcontractors<br />
‣ Securities transaction tax, Fringe benefit tax, Income tax and<br />
Wealth tax<br />
‣Salaries payable outside India or to a non resident on which tax has<br />
not been deducted at source<br />
‣Tax actually paid by an employer referred to in section 10(10CC)<br />
‣ In case <strong>of</strong> any interest, commission or brokerage, rent, royalty,<br />
fees for pr<strong>of</strong>essional services or fees for technical services to a<br />
resident, or amounts payable to a contractor or sub-contractor,<br />
being resident; on which tax has not been deducted, or after<br />
deduction, has not been paid<br />
‣ No disallowance if tax paid before due date for filing return.<br />
There will be no disallowance <strong>of</strong> any interest, commission or<br />
brokerage, rent, royalty, fees for pr<strong>of</strong>essional services or fees for<br />
technical services payable to a resident, or amounts payable to a<br />
resident contractor or sub-contractor for carrying out any work if<br />
after deduction <strong>of</strong> tax during the previous year, it is paid on or<br />
before the due date <strong>of</strong> filing <strong>of</strong> return <strong>of</strong> income specified in<br />
section 139(1). [s. 40(a)(ia) ; w.e.f. 01.04.2010 : FA 2010]<br />
115
8/23/2011<br />
Clause 17g. Interest, salary, bonus, commission or remuneration<br />
admissible under section 40(b)/40(ba) and computation there<strong>of</strong><br />
‣ Tax auditor is required to state the inadmissible amount under<br />
this clause after applying the conditions for allowance or<br />
disallowance and accordingly determine the prima facie<br />
inadmissibility <strong>of</strong> the deduction and also quantify the same<br />
‣ Conditions for admissibility:<br />
a. Remuneration to working partner<br />
b. Remuneration/interest is authorized by partnership deed<br />
c. The interest should not exceed 12% p.a. and the remuneration<br />
should not exceed the maximum permissible limits.<br />
d. The same should not pertain to a period prior to the date <strong>of</strong><br />
partnership deed.<br />
Firm<br />
<br />
Section 40 (b): Uniform limit has been fixed for both pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
firms and non-pr<strong>of</strong>essional firms in respect <strong>of</strong> payments <strong>of</strong> salary,<br />
bonus, commission or remuneration to the working partners: - w.e.f.<br />
01.04.2010<br />
Book Pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />
On the first Rs.3,00,000 <strong>of</strong> the bookpr<strong>of</strong>it<br />
On the balance <strong>of</strong> the book-pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />
Allowable Remuneration<br />
Rs. 1,50,000/- or 90% <strong>of</strong> the bookpr<strong>of</strong>it,<br />
whichever is more.<br />
60% <strong>of</strong> book-pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />
In case <strong>of</strong> loss Rs. 1,50,000/-<br />
116
8/23/2011<br />
40(ba) Payment Of Interest Salary, Bonus, Commission Or<br />
Remuneration Made By AOP/BOI To Its Members<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> a AOP/BOI any payment <strong>of</strong> interest,<br />
salary, bonus commission or remuneration made by<br />
such AOP/BOI to any <strong>of</strong> its member.<br />
Note:<br />
1. Interest paid to member - Interest received from such member<br />
= Net to be disallowed.<br />
2. If member in individual capacity, then interest paid in<br />
representative capacity be allowed.<br />
3. If member in representative capacity, then interest<br />
paid in individual capacity be allowed.<br />
4. Salary paid in any capacity is to be disallowed.<br />
117
8/23/2011<br />
Clause 17h.(A). Whether a certificate has been obtained from the<br />
assessee regarding payments relating to any expenditure covered<br />
under section 40A(3) that the payments were made by account payee<br />
cheques drawn on a bank or account payee draft, as the case may be,<br />
[Yes/No]<br />
‣ Confirmation <strong>of</strong> obtaining a certificate from the assessee regarding<br />
payments relating to any expenditure covered under section 40A(3)<br />
to be given in the above clause<br />
‣ Management Representation obtained from clients could be<br />
regarded as a certificate for this clause<br />
‣ Certificate need not be attached with the Tax Audit Report<br />
Clause 17h. (B) amount inadmissible under section 40A(3), read with<br />
rule 6DD [with break up <strong>of</strong> inadmissible amounts]<br />
‣ Section 40A(3) provides that where assessee incurs any expenditure<br />
in respect <strong>of</strong> which payment is made in a sum exceeding Rs.20,000<br />
otherwise than by a account payee cheque / account payee bank draft,<br />
no deduction shall be allowed in respect <strong>of</strong> such expenditure.<br />
‣ Tax auditor should obtain a list <strong>of</strong> all payments exceeding Rs. 20,000<br />
made by the assessee during the previous year which should also<br />
include the list <strong>of</strong> payments exempted in terms <strong>of</strong> Rule 6DD with<br />
reasons.<br />
‣ List should be verified by the tax auditor with the books <strong>of</strong> account in<br />
order to ascertain whether the conditions for specific exemption granted<br />
in Rule 6DD are satisfied.<br />
‣Details <strong>of</strong> payments which do not satisfy the above conditions should<br />
be stated under this clause<br />
118
8/23/2011<br />
Note: The assessee maintains that all payments for expenses<br />
made from bank accounts in excess <strong>of</strong> Rs. 20,000/- have been<br />
made by account payee cheques or account payee bank drafts.<br />
However, this could not be verified by the examining Chartered<br />
Accountants as the necessary evidence is not in the possession <strong>of</strong><br />
the assessee.<br />
40A(3) and 40A(3A) Payments Made Otherwise Than By<br />
Account Payee Cheque Or Account Payee Bank Draft<br />
Section 40A(3) shall be attracted if the following<br />
conditions are fulfilled:<br />
‣ Assessee incurs any expenditure<br />
‣ in respect <strong>of</strong> which payment or aggregate <strong>of</strong><br />
payments made<br />
‣ to a person<br />
‣ in a single day<br />
‣ Of a sum exceeding Rs.20,000/-<br />
‣ Otherwise than by account payee cheque or<br />
account payee demand draft<br />
119
8/23/2011<br />
Section 40A(3A): Where an allowance has been made in the<br />
assessment for any year in respect <strong>of</strong> any liability incurred<br />
by the assessee for any expenditure and subsequently<br />
during any previous year (hereinafter referred to as<br />
subsequent year) the assessee makes payment in respect<br />
there<strong>of</strong>, otherwise than by an account payee cheque<br />
drawn on a bank or account payee bank draft, the<br />
payment so made shall be deemed to be the pr<strong>of</strong>its and<br />
gains <strong>of</strong> business or pr<strong>of</strong>ession and accordingly<br />
chargeable to income-tax as income <strong>of</strong> the subsequent<br />
year if the payment or aggregate <strong>of</strong> payments made to<br />
a person in a day, exceeds Rs. 20,000/-.<br />
Transportation<br />
Section 40 (3A):<br />
<br />
Newly inserted proviso provides that in case <strong>of</strong> payment made for plying,<br />
hiring or leasing goods carriages,<br />
the limit will be Rs. 35,000/- instead <strong>of</strong> Rs. 20,000/-,<br />
<br />
in respect <strong>of</strong> disallowance where the payment is made in cash or<br />
otherwise than by way <strong>of</strong> account payee cheque or DD. - w.e.f. 01.10.2009<br />
120
8/23/2011<br />
Rule 6DD – Disallowance <strong>of</strong> cash payments<br />
As per Rule 6DD as amended by Rules 2007 ‗no disallowance shall<br />
be made even if payment is made in excess <strong>of</strong> Rs. 20,000, in<br />
the cases and circumstances specified hereunder, namely:-<br />
- Where payment is made toi.<br />
RBI<br />
ii. SBI<br />
iii. Any co-operative bank or land mortgage bank<br />
iv. Any primary agricultural credit society<br />
v. LIC<br />
It may be noted that sub-clauses vi) to xviii) [i.e payment to<br />
IDBI, ICICI, UTI etc] <strong>of</strong> the said rule have been omitted by<br />
Notification 208/2007, dated June 27, 2007.<br />
Notes:<br />
1. In certain cases as specified in Rule 6DD, payment in<br />
a sum exceeding Rs. 20,000/- may be made otherwise<br />
than by an account payee cheque/DD.<br />
2. Attar Singh Gurmukh Singh (Supreme Court) -<br />
Purchase <strong>of</strong> stock or raw material constitute<br />
expenditure. Section 40A(3) shall apply on payment<br />
made in this regard.<br />
121
8/23/2011<br />
3. Vijay Kumar Ajit Kumar - Section 40A(3) shall<br />
also apply in case <strong>of</strong> advance payment for the<br />
expenditure made otherwise than by account payee<br />
cheque. Disallowance shall be in the year in which<br />
expenditure is incurred.<br />
4. Section 40A(3) attracted for purchases made<br />
otherwise than by account payee cheque by Pucca<br />
Ahartiya and not attracted for purchases made by<br />
a Kachcha Ahartiya.<br />
40A(4) Payments Made By Account Payee Cheque in<br />
Violation <strong>of</strong> a Contract<br />
‣ Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law<br />
for the time being in force or in any contract,<br />
‣ where any payment in respect <strong>of</strong> any expenditure has<br />
to be made by an account payee cheque or an account<br />
payee bank draft in order that such expenditure may not<br />
be disallowed as deduction under section 40A(3),<br />
122
8/23/2011<br />
‣ then such payment may be made by such cheque or<br />
draft, and where the payment is so made,<br />
‣ no person shall be allowed to raise, in any suit or<br />
proceeding a plea on the ground that the payment<br />
was not made in cash or in any other manner.<br />
Where the payment is made by-<br />
i. Letter <strong>of</strong> credit<br />
ii.<br />
iii.<br />
iv.<br />
Mail or telegraphic transfer<br />
Book adjustment from one bank account to any other account<br />
Bill <strong>of</strong> exchange<br />
v. Use <strong>of</strong> electronic clearing system through bank account<br />
vi.<br />
vii.<br />
Credit card<br />
Debit card<br />
It may be noted that sub-clauses v) to vii) as above have been<br />
inserted by Notification no. 208/2007 dated June 27, 2007<br />
123
8/23/2011<br />
Clause 17i. Provision for payment <strong>of</strong> gratuity not allowable under<br />
section 40A(7)<br />
‣ As per section 40A(7), deduction <strong>of</strong> any provision is allowable<br />
only if provision is made for contribution to any approved gratuity<br />
fund or the provision relates to the amount <strong>of</strong> gratuity which has<br />
become payable during the previous year.<br />
‣ The tax auditor should call for the order <strong>of</strong> Commissioner <strong>of</strong> I.T<br />
granting approval for gratuity fund, verify the date from which it is<br />
effective and also verify whether the provision has been made as<br />
provided in the trust deed.<br />
40A(7) Employer’s Contribution To Gratuity Fund<br />
No deduction shall be allowed in respect <strong>of</strong> any<br />
provision made by the assessee for the payment <strong>of</strong><br />
gratuity to his employees on their retirement or<br />
termination <strong>of</strong> employment. However deduction shall<br />
be allowed in respect <strong>of</strong> (i) payment <strong>of</strong> a sum as<br />
contribution towards approved gratuity fund or (ii)<br />
Any provision made for the purpose <strong>of</strong> payment <strong>of</strong><br />
gratuity becoming payable during the year.<br />
124
8/23/2011<br />
Note: No deduction shall be allowed in respect <strong>of</strong> any<br />
provision made by the assessee for payment <strong>of</strong><br />
gratuity to his employees.<br />
Exceptions:<br />
1. Payment as contribution towards approved gratuity<br />
fund.<br />
2. Provisions made for payment <strong>of</strong> gratuity actually<br />
becoming payable during the previous year.<br />
Note: If the gratuity fund is unapproved, deduction for<br />
gratuity shall not be allowed even if the provision for<br />
gratuity is made as per Actuary.<br />
Note: If a policy is taken from LIC for providing<br />
gratuity to employees then annual premium is allowed<br />
as deduction u/s 37(1).<br />
125
8/23/2011<br />
Clause 17j. Any sum paid by the assessee as an employer not<br />
allowable under section 40A(9)<br />
‣ Under section 40 A(9), any payments made by an employer<br />
towards the setting up or formation <strong>of</strong> or as contribution to any fund,<br />
trust, company, or other institutions (other than contributions to<br />
recognised provident fund or approved superannuation fund or<br />
approved gratuity fund )is not allowable.<br />
‣ Tax auditor should furnish the details <strong>of</strong> payments which are not<br />
allowable under this section<br />
40A(9) Employer’s Contribution To Approved Gratuity<br />
Fund, Recognized Provident Fund Or Approved<br />
Superannuation Fund<br />
No deduction shall be allowed in respect <strong>of</strong> any sum<br />
paid by the assessee towards setting up or formation <strong>of</strong>,<br />
or as contribution to, any fund, trust, company,<br />
association <strong>of</strong> persons, body <strong>of</strong> individuals, society or<br />
any institution except where such sum is required to be<br />
paid under any law in force or where such sum is paid<br />
for an approved gratuity fund, recognised provident<br />
fund or approved superannuation fund.<br />
126
8/23/2011<br />
Clause 17k. Particulars <strong>of</strong> any liability <strong>of</strong> a contingent<br />
nature<br />
‣ Detailed scrutiny <strong>of</strong> account heads like outstanding<br />
liabilities, provision etc to be made to ascertain any such<br />
particulars <strong>of</strong> contingent nature debited to pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss<br />
account.<br />
Clause 17(l). Amount <strong>of</strong> deduction inadmissible in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
section 14A in respect <strong>of</strong> the expenditure incurred in relation to<br />
income which does not form part <strong>of</strong> the total income.:-<br />
‣ Section 14A provides that no deduction shall be made in respect<br />
<strong>of</strong> expenditure incurred by assessee in relation to income which is<br />
exempt from tax.<br />
‣ The tax auditor has to verify the details furnished by the assessee<br />
and should satisfy himself that the inadmissible amounts have<br />
been worked out correctly.<br />
‣ Where an assessee claims that no expenditure has been incurred<br />
by him in relation to income which does not form part <strong>of</strong> the total<br />
income under the Act and does not furnish the necessary<br />
particulars for the purpose <strong>of</strong> ascertaining the inadmissible<br />
expenditure under section 14A, the tax auditor has to make a<br />
proper disclaimer / qualification.<br />
127
8/23/2011<br />
Clause 17 (l): Section 14A<br />
Deduction inadmissible u/s14A in respect <strong>of</strong> the expenditure incurred in<br />
relation to income which does not form part <strong>of</strong> the total income( Subsection 1).<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The AO, if he is not satisfied with the claim <strong>of</strong> the assessee, shall determine the<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> expenditure incurred, in relation to income which does not form part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
total income in accordance with method prescribed under rule 8D (w.e.f. 24-3-2008),<br />
( Subsection 2).<br />
the expenditure which the AO seeks to disallow under s. 14A should be actually<br />
incurred and so incurred with a view to producing non-taxable income (101 TTJ 369,<br />
ACIT vs Eicher Limited.)<br />
Rule 8D w.e.f. 24-3-2008: Method for determining amount <strong>of</strong> expenditure in relation<br />
to income not includible in total income.<br />
8D. (1) Where the Assessing Officer, having regard to the accounts <strong>of</strong> the assessee <strong>of</strong><br />
a previous year, is not satisfied with<br />
(a) the correctness <strong>of</strong> the claim <strong>of</strong> expenditure made by the assessee; or<br />
(b) the claim made by the assessee that no expenditure has been incurred in<br />
relation to income which does not form part <strong>of</strong> the total income under the Act for<br />
such previous year,he shall determine the amount <strong>of</strong> expenditure in relation to such<br />
income in accordance with the provisions <strong>of</strong> sub-rule (2).<br />
(2) The expenditure in relation to income which does not form part <strong>of</strong><br />
the total income shall be the aggregate <strong>of</strong> following amounts, namely :<br />
i. the amount <strong>of</strong> expenditure directly relating to income which does not<br />
form part <strong>of</strong> total income;<br />
ii. in a case where the assessee has incurred expenditure by way <strong>of</strong><br />
interest during the previous year which is not directly attributable to<br />
any particular income or receipt, an amount computed in<br />
accordance with the following formula, namely :<br />
A x B/C<br />
A = amount <strong>of</strong> expenditure by way o f interest other than the<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> interest included in clause (i) incurred during the<br />
previous year ;<br />
B = the average <strong>of</strong> value <strong>of</strong> investment, income from which<br />
does not or shall not form part <strong>of</strong> the total income, as<br />
appearing in the balance sheet <strong>of</strong> the assessee, on the<br />
first day and the last day <strong>of</strong> the previous year ;<br />
C = the average <strong>of</strong> total assets as appearing in the balance<br />
sheet <strong>of</strong> the assessee, on the first day and the last<br />
day <strong>of</strong> the revious year ;<br />
c<br />
Clause 17 (l): Rule 8D: Determination<br />
128
8/23/2011<br />
iii.<br />
an amount equal to one-half per cent <strong>of</strong> the average <strong>of</strong> the value<br />
<strong>of</strong> investment, income from which does not or shall not form<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the total income, as appearing in the balance sheet <strong>of</strong><br />
the assessee, on the first day and the last day <strong>of</strong> the previous<br />
year.<br />
3. For the purposes <strong>of</strong> this rule, the 'total assets' shall mean, total<br />
assets as appearing in the balance sheet excluding the<br />
increase on account <strong>of</strong> revaluation <strong>of</strong> assets but<br />
the decrease on account <strong>of</strong> revaluation <strong>of</strong> assets.<br />
including<br />
Clause 17m. Amount inadmissible under the proviso to section<br />
36(1)(iii)<br />
‣ Section 36(1)(iii) provides that interest on borrowed capital<br />
would be deductible only if :<br />
a) The assessee has borrowed money.<br />
b) It is used for the purpose <strong>of</strong> business and pr<strong>of</strong>ession.<br />
c) Interest is paid/payable on such money.<br />
‣ The proviso to the above section requires that capital borrowed<br />
for acquisition <strong>of</strong> asset for extension <strong>of</strong> existing business or<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>ession for any period beginning from the date on which the<br />
capital was borrowed for acquisition <strong>of</strong> the asset till the date on<br />
which such asset was first put to use shall not be allowed as a<br />
deduction.<br />
‣ Tax auditor has to thus report the amount inadmissible under<br />
the above proviso.<br />
129
8/23/2011<br />
Clause 17A.<br />
Amount <strong>of</strong> interest inadmissible under section 23 <strong>of</strong> the Micro,<br />
Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006.<br />
‣The auditor should report here the amount <strong>of</strong> interest paid to the<br />
Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises.<br />
Notification No. 36/2009<br />
This is a new clause inserted by the Central Board <strong>of</strong> Direct<br />
Taxes through its Notification No. 36/2009 dated 13-4-2009, in<br />
the Form No.3CD in Appendix II <strong>of</strong> the Income-tax Rules,<br />
1962<br />
The tax auditor is required to state the amount <strong>of</strong> interest<br />
inadmissible under section 23 <strong>of</strong> the Micro, Small and Medium<br />
Enterprises Development Act, 2006.<br />
The Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act,<br />
2006 (MSME Act) is an Act to provide for facilitating the<br />
promotion and development and enhancing the<br />
competitiveness <strong>of</strong> micro, small and medium enterprises and<br />
for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.<br />
130
8/23/2011<br />
Section 23 <strong>of</strong> the MSME Act<br />
‣ Section 23 <strong>of</strong> the MSME Act lays down that an interest<br />
payable or paid by the buyer, under or in accordance with<br />
the provisions <strong>of</strong> this Act, shall not for the purposes<br />
<strong>of</strong> the computation <strong>of</strong> income under the Income-tax<br />
Act,1961 be allowed as a deduction.<br />
‣ The inadmissible interest has to be determined on the<br />
basis <strong>of</strong> the provisions <strong>of</strong> the MSME Act.<br />
‣ Section 16 <strong>of</strong> the MSME Act provides for the date from<br />
which and the rate at which the interest is payable.<br />
‣ Accordingly, where a buyer fails to make payment <strong>of</strong><br />
the amount to the supplier, as required under section<br />
15, the buyer shall, notwithstanding anything contained<br />
in any agreement between the buyer and the supplier<br />
or any law for the time being in force, be liable to pay<br />
compound interest with monthly rests to the supplier<br />
on that amount from the appointed date or, as the case<br />
may be, from the date immediately following the date<br />
agreed upon, at three times <strong>of</strong> the bank rate notified by<br />
the Reserve Bank.<br />
131
8/23/2011<br />
Section 15 <strong>of</strong> the MSME Act<br />
Section 15 <strong>of</strong> the MSME Act, requires the buyer to make<br />
payment on or before the date agreed upon in writing, or<br />
where there is no agreement in this behalf, before the<br />
appointed day. It also provides that the period agreed<br />
upon in writing shall not exceed forty five days from the<br />
day <strong>of</strong> acceptance or the day <strong>of</strong> deemed acceptance.<br />
Section 22 <strong>of</strong> the MSME Act<br />
Section 22 <strong>of</strong> the MSME Act provides that where any buyer is<br />
required to get his annual accounts audited under any law for<br />
the time being in force, such buyer shall furnish the following<br />
additional information in his annual statement <strong>of</strong> accounts,<br />
namely:-<br />
132
8/23/2011<br />
i. The principal amount and interest due thereon (to be<br />
shown separately) remaining unpaid to any supplier as at<br />
the end <strong>of</strong> each accounting year.<br />
<br />
ii. The amount <strong>of</strong> interest paid by the buyer in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
Section 16, along with the amount <strong>of</strong> payment made to<br />
supplier beyond the appointed date during each<br />
accounting year.<br />
iii. The amount <strong>of</strong> interest due and payable for the delay in making<br />
payment (which have been paid but beyond the appointed day<br />
during the year) but without adding the interest specified under<br />
this Act.<br />
<br />
iv. The amount <strong>of</strong> interest accrued and remaining unpaid at the end<br />
<strong>of</strong> each accounting year; and<br />
v. The amount <strong>of</strong> further interest remaining due and payable even<br />
in the succeeding years, until such date when the interest dues as<br />
above are actually paid to the small enterprise, for the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />
disallowance as a deductible expenditure under section 23.<br />
133
8/23/2011<br />
Where the tax auditor is issuing his report in Form<br />
No.3CB, he should verify that the financial statements<br />
audited by him contain the information as prescribed<br />
under section 22 <strong>of</strong> the MSME Act. If no disclosure is<br />
made by the auditee in the financial statements he should<br />
give an appropriate qualification in Form No.3CB, in<br />
addition to the reporting requirement in clause 17A <strong>of</strong><br />
Form No. 3CD.<br />
Clause 18. Particulars <strong>of</strong> payments made to persons specified under<br />
section 40A(2)(b)<br />
‣ Section 40A(2) provides that expenditure for which payment has<br />
been or is to be made to specified persons may be disallowed<br />
(excess portion) if in opinion <strong>of</strong> A.O, such expenditure is excessive<br />
or unreasonable having regard to,<br />
1. Fair Market value.<br />
2. Legitimate needs <strong>of</strong> business/pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />
3. Benefit derived by assessee<br />
‣ Tax auditor should obtain a full list <strong>of</strong> specified persons as<br />
contemplated in this section and obtain details <strong>of</strong><br />
expenditure/payments made to specified persons<br />
‣ Tax auditor should scrutinize all items <strong>of</strong> payments to above<br />
persons<br />
134
8/23/2011<br />
If necessary, indicate in Form 3CD by way <strong>of</strong> a note as under :<br />
―The Company does not have a complete list <strong>of</strong> "relatives" <strong>of</strong><br />
directors or a list <strong>of</strong> "persons" who carry on business or pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />
in which a director <strong>of</strong> the Company or a relative <strong>of</strong> such director or<br />
such individuals together with the assessee Company has/have a<br />
substantial interest. According to the information with the<br />
Company, the Company has certified that there are no payments<br />
other than disclosed above made to persons specified in Section<br />
40A(2)(b) <strong>of</strong> the Income tax Act; this has not been verified by the<br />
auditors.‖<br />
Chart <strong>of</strong> persons specified in Section<br />
40A(2)(b)<br />
Individual Firm Association<br />
<strong>of</strong> persons<br />
HUF<br />
Company<br />
His<br />
relatives<br />
Its<br />
Partners<br />
Its<br />
Members<br />
Its<br />
Members<br />
Its<br />
Directors<br />
Their<br />
relatives<br />
Their<br />
relatives<br />
Their<br />
relatives<br />
Their<br />
relatives<br />
135
8/23/2011<br />
Where person having substantial interest in<br />
the business or pr<strong>of</strong>ession <strong>of</strong> the assessee is<br />
Individual Firm Associatio<br />
n <strong>of</strong><br />
persons<br />
His<br />
relatives<br />
Its<br />
Partners<br />
Its<br />
Members<br />
HUF<br />
Its<br />
Members<br />
Company<br />
Its<br />
Directors<br />
Their<br />
relatives<br />
Their<br />
relatives<br />
Their<br />
relatives<br />
Their<br />
relatives<br />
Note : where one or more the persons falling in any <strong>of</strong><br />
the above categories (i.e. individual and his relatives,<br />
firm, its partners and their relatives, etc.) have<br />
substantial interest in the business or pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />
carried on by any person – that person is also covered<br />
under section 40A(2)(b)<br />
136
8/23/2011<br />
Note: Where one or more <strong>of</strong> the persons falling in any <strong>of</strong> the above<br />
categories (i.e. individual and his relatives, firm, its partners and their<br />
relatives, etc.) have substantial interest in the business or pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />
carried on by any person - that person is also covered under<br />
section 40A(2)(b)<br />
PART III<br />
Director Partner Member <strong>of</strong> AOP Member <strong>of</strong> HUF<br />
Companies in<br />
which he is a<br />
Director<br />
All other<br />
Directors <strong>of</strong><br />
such<br />
companies<br />
Firm in which he<br />
Is a partner<br />
All other partners<br />
Of such firms<br />
AOP <strong>of</strong> which he is a<br />
member<br />
All other members <strong>of</strong><br />
such HUF<br />
All other members <strong>of</strong><br />
such HUF<br />
Their Relatives Their relatives Their relatives Their relatives<br />
137
8/23/2011<br />
Notes:<br />
1. Relative is defined in section 2(41) as including husband, wife, brother, sister or<br />
any lineal ascendant or descendent <strong>of</strong> the individual.<br />
2. "Person having a substantial interest" is explained in section 40-A as under:<br />
i. In the case <strong>of</strong> company - the person concerned is, at any time, during the<br />
previous year the beneficial owner <strong>of</strong> shares (not being shares entitled to a<br />
fixed rate <strong>of</strong> dividend whether with or without a right to participate in pr<strong>of</strong>its)<br />
carrying not less than 20% <strong>of</strong> the voting power.<br />
ii.<br />
In other cases - such person is at any time during the previous year,<br />
beneficially entitled to not less than 20% <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>its <strong>of</strong> such<br />
business or pr<strong>of</strong>ession.<br />
Clause 19 :- Amounts deemed to be pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains<br />
under section 33AB or 33ABA or 33AC<br />
‣ Sections 33AB and 33ABA lay down the<br />
circumstances under which amount withdrawn from<br />
deposits covered thereby for purposes other than<br />
specified purposes, is to be deemed income chargeable<br />
as pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains. Tax auditor is required to report<br />
such amounts<br />
138
8/23/2011<br />
Clause 20 :- Any amount <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it chargeable to tax under section 41 and<br />
computation there<strong>of</strong><br />
Section 41 mainly includes<br />
a.) Recovery <strong>of</strong> any loss, expenditure or trading liability, earlier allowed as<br />
deduction.<br />
b.) In case <strong>of</strong> undertaking engaged in generation/ distribution <strong>of</strong> power, if building,<br />
machinery, plant or furniture is sold/discarded/demolished or destroyed.<br />
c.) When an asset used for scientific research is sold.<br />
d.) Subsequent recovery <strong>of</strong> bad debt, earlier allowed as deduction.<br />
e.) Amount withdrawn from special reserve created under section 36(1)(viii).<br />
Clause 21:- In respect <strong>of</strong> any sum referred to in clause (a), (b), (c),<br />
(d), (e) or (f) <strong>of</strong> section 43B, the liability for which;<br />
(A)pre-existed on the first day <strong>of</strong> the previous year but was not<br />
allowed in the assessment <strong>of</strong> any preceding previous year and was<br />
(a) paid during the previous year;<br />
(b) not paid during the previous year;<br />
• Trace the amount <strong>of</strong> liability which was pre-existed on 1 st April<br />
2009 from statements attached to the Tax audit report for clause<br />
21(i)(A) & 21(i)(B) for the year ended 31 st March, 2009.<br />
• Obtain the closing balance from the trial balance for the year<br />
ended 31.03.09<br />
• E. g. Bonus to employees, Compensated Absences<br />
139
8/23/2011<br />
(B) was incurred in the previous year and was<br />
a) paid on or before the due date for furnishing the return <strong>of</strong> income <strong>of</strong><br />
the previous year under section 139(1);<br />
(b)not paid on or before the aforesaid date<br />
• Trace the closing balances <strong>of</strong> unpaid liability from the audited trial<br />
balance (current liability).<br />
• Obtain the details <strong>of</strong> subsequent payment from the client.<br />
• Verified respective ledger accounts to verify the subsequent payments<br />
remained unpaid.<br />
• E.g. Excise duty, Sales Tax / Value Added Tax, Work Contract Tax,<br />
Commission to Managing, Bonus to employees , Leave Encashment, P<br />
F contribution, ESIC contribution, Gratuity - Officers‗, Interest<br />
accrued but not due<br />
In respect <strong>of</strong> the expenditure covered by clauses (a) to<br />
(f) <strong>of</strong> section<br />
43B, the particulars may be furnished in the following<br />
form,<br />
140
8/23/2011<br />
A) Liability pre- existing on first day <strong>of</strong> previous year<br />
Sr.<br />
No.<br />
Nature<br />
liability<br />
<strong>of</strong><br />
Outstan<br />
ding<br />
opening<br />
balance<br />
not<br />
allowed<br />
in any<br />
earlier<br />
previous<br />
year(s)<br />
Amount<br />
paid/set<br />
<strong>of</strong>f<br />
during<br />
the year<br />
against<br />
column<br />
3<br />
Amount<br />
written<br />
back to<br />
the<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />
and loss<br />
account<br />
Amount<br />
remainin<br />
g unpaid<br />
as at the<br />
end <strong>of</strong><br />
the year<br />
Whether<br />
passed<br />
through<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>it &<br />
loss<br />
account<br />
Remark<br />
s<br />
1 2 3 4 5 (3-4-<br />
5)=6<br />
7 8<br />
B) Liability Incurred during the Previous year<br />
Sr.<br />
No<br />
.<br />
Nature <strong>of</strong><br />
liability<br />
Amount<br />
incurred<br />
during the<br />
previous<br />
year but<br />
remaining<br />
outstanding<br />
as on the<br />
last day <strong>of</strong><br />
the previous<br />
year)<br />
Amount paid/set<br />
<strong>of</strong>f before the<br />
due date <strong>of</strong><br />
filing<br />
return/date upto<br />
which reported<br />
in the tax audit<br />
report,<br />
whichever is<br />
earlier against<br />
column (3)<br />
Amount<br />
unpaid on<br />
the due date<br />
<strong>of</strong> filing the<br />
return/date<br />
upto which<br />
reported in<br />
the tax<br />
audit report<br />
whichever<br />
is earlier<br />
Whether<br />
passed<br />
through<br />
the pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />
& loss<br />
account<br />
Rema<br />
rks<br />
1 2 3 4 5 6 7<br />
141
8/23/2011<br />
43B certain deductions On Actual Payment Basis<br />
Notwithstanding anything contained in any other<br />
provisions <strong>of</strong> the Income Tax Act, a deduction<br />
otherwise allowable under the act in respect <strong>of</strong> –<br />
a. any tax, duty, cess or fee, by whatever name called,<br />
payable under any law for the time being in force, or<br />
b. employer's contribution to provident fund, gratuity<br />
fund or any other fund for the welfare <strong>of</strong> the<br />
employees, or<br />
c. any bonus or Commission payable to the employees,<br />
or<br />
d. interest payable on any loan or borrowing from any<br />
public financial institution or a state Financial<br />
Corporation or state Industrial Investment<br />
Corporation, or<br />
e. Interest payable on any Loan or ADVANCE from a<br />
scheduled bank, (―Scheduled bank‖ includes a Cooperative<br />
bank).<br />
f. Leave encashment payable to employees.<br />
142
8/23/2011<br />
shall be allowed as deduction only in the previous year<br />
in which such sum is actually paid by him. This is<br />
irrespective <strong>of</strong> the previous year in which the liability to<br />
pay such sum was incurred by the assessee according to<br />
the method <strong>of</strong> accounting employed by him.<br />
Notes:<br />
1. The provisions <strong>of</strong> section 43B shall not apply in relation<br />
to any sum which is actually paid by the assessee on or<br />
before the due date applicable in his case for furnishing<br />
the return <strong>of</strong> income under section 139(1) in respect <strong>of</strong><br />
the previous year in which liability to pay such sum was<br />
incurred by the assessee and the evidence <strong>of</strong> such<br />
payment is furnished along with the return <strong>of</strong> income.<br />
2. CBDT Circular: If under a scheme <strong>of</strong> the State<br />
Government, payment <strong>of</strong> sales tax is deferred for<br />
specified number <strong>of</strong> years, sales tax deferred will be<br />
deemed to have been paid for the purposes <strong>of</strong> section<br />
43B.<br />
3. Where interest payable under clause (d) or (e) is<br />
converted into a loan or advance or borrowing, then<br />
it shall not be deemed to have been actually paid.<br />
143
8/23/2011<br />
Clause 22 (a) Amount <strong>of</strong> Modified Value Added Tax credits availed <strong>of</strong> or utilized<br />
during the previous year its treatment in the pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account treatment <strong>of</strong><br />
outstanding Modified Value Added Tax credits in the accounts.<br />
‣Tax auditor should verify that there is a proper reconciliation between balance <strong>of</strong><br />
CENVAT credit in the accounts and relevant excise records. (Viz. RG-23)<br />
‣Tax auditor should verify that the information furnished under this sub-clause is<br />
compatible with the information under clause 12(b)<br />
‣Reporting in following format<br />
Balance at beginning <strong>of</strong> the year<br />
Add: CENVAT Credit available during the year<br />
Less: CENVAT Credit utilised during the year<br />
Outstanding at the end <strong>of</strong> the year<br />
XXX<br />
XXX<br />
(XXX)<br />
XXX<br />
(b) Particulars <strong>of</strong> income or expenditure <strong>of</strong> prior period credited or debited to the<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account.<br />
‣ Accounts audited----Annual Accounts<br />
Accounts not audited----Close scrutiny <strong>of</strong> ledger to determine period to which<br />
income/expenditure relates.<br />
‣ Both AS 5 and AS(IT)-II notified by Govt under section 145 state that if the<br />
material adjustments arising due to error or ommission in earlier years, then prior<br />
period item.<br />
‣ There is difference between expenditure <strong>of</strong> any earlier year debited to the pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />
and loss account and the expenditure relating to any earlier year, which has<br />
crystallised during the relevant previous year<br />
‣ Material adjustments necessitated by circumstances which though related to<br />
previous periods but determined in the current period, will not be considered as<br />
prior period items.<br />
144
8/23/2011<br />
Clause 23. Details <strong>of</strong> any amount borrowed on hundi or any amount due<br />
thereon (including interest on the amount borrowed) repaid, otherwise than<br />
through an account payee cheque [Section 69D]:-<br />
Statute: As per Sec 69 D, the amount so borrowed or repaid shall be deemed<br />
to be the income <strong>of</strong> the person borrowing or repaying the amount aforesaid<br />
for the previous year in which the amount was borrowed or repaid<br />
Hundi---Promissory Note.<br />
Audit Procedures:<br />
‣The Tax auditor to obtain a complete list <strong>of</strong> borrowings and repayments <strong>of</strong><br />
hundi loans otherwise than by account payee cheques<br />
‣Verify the same with the books <strong>of</strong> account.<br />
‣Verify records in possession <strong>of</strong> assessee.<br />
‣If records are not available, give appropriate disclaimer to that effect.<br />
‣ Scrutinize cash and petty cash book<br />
Amount borrowed or repaid on hundi.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Where any amount is borrowed on a hundi from, or any amount due<br />
thereon is repaid to, any person otherwise than through an account<br />
payee cheque drawn on a bank, the amount so borrowed or repaid<br />
shall be deemed to be the income <strong>of</strong> the person borrowing or<br />
repaying the amount aforesaid for the previous year in which the<br />
amount was borrowed or repaid, as the case may be :<br />
Provided that, if in any case any amount borrowed on a hundi has<br />
been deemed under the provisions <strong>of</strong> this section to be the income<br />
<strong>of</strong> any person, such person shall not be liable to be assessed again in<br />
respect <strong>of</strong> such amount under the provisions <strong>of</strong> this section on<br />
repayment <strong>of</strong> such amount.<br />
Explanation.—For the purposes <strong>of</strong> this section, the amount repaid<br />
shall include the amount <strong>of</strong> interest paid on the amount borrowed.]<br />
145
8/23/2011<br />
Clause 24 (a) * Particulars <strong>of</strong> each loan or deposit in an amount exceeding the limit<br />
specified in section 269SS taken or accepted during the previous year :—<br />
i. name, address and permanent account number (if available with the assessee) <strong>of</strong><br />
the lender or depositor;<br />
ii.<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> loan or deposit taken or accepted;<br />
iii.<br />
whether the loan or deposit was squared up during the previous year;<br />
iv.<br />
maximum amount outstanding in the account at any time during the previous<br />
year;<br />
v. whether the loan or deposit was taken or accepted otherwise than by an account<br />
payee cheque or an account payee bank draft.<br />
Statute: If loan or deposit to be accepted together alongwith loans or deposits<br />
already accepted, exceeding Rs. 20,000 to be availed only through account<br />
payee cheque or account payee bank draft.<br />
Audit Procedures: The Tax auditor to obtain details <strong>of</strong> all loans or deposits taken<br />
and verify the same with records maintained by the assessee. Where records are<br />
not available auditor to give a disclaimer that necessary evidence is not in<br />
possession <strong>of</strong> assessee.<br />
Other Considerations:<br />
‣ Payments not made through account payee cheques or bank drafts but through<br />
bank transfers like RTGS, NEFT , then tax auditor should give an appropriate<br />
note to that effect.<br />
‣ Sec 269SS applies even when loans are taken free <strong>of</strong> interest.<br />
‣ Deposit also includes current account, security deposit against contracts.<br />
‣ Scrutinize advances account to verify whether advances are in nature <strong>of</strong><br />
deposits.<br />
‣ Sec 269SS shall not apply when loans are accepted by Government, Banking<br />
Company, Govt. Co. or Co. established under Central, State, Provincial Act.<br />
146
8/23/2011<br />
Section 269SS provides that any loan or deposit shall not<br />
be taken or accepted from any other person otherwise<br />
than by an account payee cheque or account payee bank<br />
draft if,<br />
(a) the amount <strong>of</strong> such loan or deposit or the<br />
aggregate amount <strong>of</strong> such loan and deposit ; or<br />
(b) on the date <strong>of</strong> taking or accepting such loan<br />
or deposit, any loan or deposit taken or accepted<br />
earlier by such person from the depositor is<br />
remaining unpaid and the amount or the aggregate<br />
amount remaining unpaid ; or<br />
(c) the amount or the aggregate amount referred to<br />
in clause (a) together with the amount or the<br />
aggregate amount referred to in clause (b), is twenty<br />
thousand rupees or more :<br />
147
8/23/2011<br />
Thus it is clear that no person can accept any loan<br />
or deposit <strong>of</strong> Rs 20000 or more otherwise than by<br />
way <strong>of</strong> an account payee cheque or an account payee<br />
draft.<br />
The limit <strong>of</strong> Rs 20000 will also apply to a case even if<br />
on the date <strong>of</strong> taking or accepting such loan<br />
or deposit, any loan or deposit taken or accepted<br />
earlier by such person from such depositor is<br />
remaining unpaid and such unpaid amount along with<br />
the loan or deposit to be accepted, exceeds the<br />
aforesaid limit.<br />
This can be explained with an example: If Mr. X has<br />
a credit balance <strong>of</strong> a loan <strong>of</strong> Rs 19000 from Mr. Y. Now in<br />
this case Mr. X cannot take loan in excess <strong>of</strong> Rs 999 more<br />
from Mr. Y except with an account payee cheque<br />
or account payee bank Draft.<br />
148
8/23/2011<br />
Exemptions from section 269SS: The Following persons<br />
are exempted from the purview <strong>of</strong> section 269SS:<br />
(a) Government ;<br />
(b) any banking company, post <strong>of</strong>fice savings bank or cooperative<br />
bank ;<br />
(c) any corporation established by a Central, State or<br />
Provincial Act ;<br />
(d) any Government company as defined in section 617 <strong>of</strong><br />
the Companies Act, 1956<br />
(e) other notified insititutions<br />
(f) where the depositor and the acceptor are both having<br />
agricultural income and neither <strong>of</strong> them have any taxable<br />
income.<br />
Consequences <strong>of</strong> contravention <strong>of</strong> section 269SS:<br />
Section 271D <strong>of</strong> Income Tax Act 1961 provides that if<br />
a loan or deposit is accepted in contravention <strong>of</strong><br />
the provisions <strong>of</strong> section 269SS then a penalty equivalent<br />
to the amount <strong>of</strong> such loan or deposit may be levied by<br />
the Joint commissioner.<br />
149
8/23/2011<br />
Clause 24 (b) * Particulars <strong>of</strong> each repayment <strong>of</strong> loan or deposit in an<br />
amount exceeding the limit specified in section 269T made during the<br />
previous year :—<br />
(i) name, address and permanent account number (if available with the<br />
assessee) <strong>of</strong> the payee;<br />
(ii) amount <strong>of</strong> repayment;<br />
(iii) maximum amount outstanding in the account at any time during the<br />
previous year;<br />
(iv) whether the repayment was made otherwise than by account payee<br />
cheque or account payee bank draft.<br />
Statute: Sec 269T is attracted when repayment <strong>of</strong> loan or deposit is made to<br />
a person<br />
When aggregate amount <strong>of</strong> loans or deposits held by such person on date <strong>of</strong><br />
repayment exceeds Rs. 20000<br />
Even though repayment amount may be less than Rs. 20000<br />
Note:<br />
‣ Loans or deposits may be held singly or jointly with some other person.<br />
‣ Repayment includes interest thereon<br />
‣ Only for company assessee, loans or deposits include loans repayable on<br />
notice and after a particular period and not on demand.<br />
Audit Procedures: The Tax auditor to obtain details <strong>of</strong> all loans or deposits<br />
repaid and verify the same with records maintained by the assessee.<br />
Where records are not available auditor to give a disclaimer<br />
150
8/23/2011<br />
Section 269T<br />
Section 269T <strong>of</strong> Income Tax Act provides that any branch<br />
<strong>of</strong> a banking company or a co operative society, firm or<br />
other person shall not repay any loan or deposit<br />
otherwise than by an account payee cheque<br />
or account payee bank draft drawn in the name <strong>of</strong><br />
the person, who has made the loan or deposit, if<br />
(1) The amount <strong>of</strong> the loan or deposit together with<br />
interest is Rs 20000 or more, or<br />
(2) The aggregate amount <strong>of</strong> loans or deposits held by<br />
such person, either in his own name or jointly with other<br />
person on the date <strong>of</strong> such repayment together with<br />
interest, is Rs 20000 or more.<br />
For example if X is having loan <strong>of</strong> Rs 30000 outstanding to<br />
Y. Then X cannot repay such loan in cash to Y.<br />
151
8/23/2011<br />
Exemptions from Section 269T:<br />
The Following persons are exempted from the<br />
purview <strong>of</strong> section 269T:<br />
(a) Government ;<br />
(b) any banking company, post <strong>of</strong>fice savings bank or cooperative<br />
bank ;<br />
(c) any corporation established by a Central, State or<br />
Provincial Act ;<br />
(d) any Government company as defined in section 617 <strong>of</strong><br />
the Companies Act, 1956<br />
(e) other notified insititutions<br />
Consequenses <strong>of</strong> contravention <strong>of</strong><br />
section 269T:<br />
Section 271E <strong>of</strong> Income Tax Act 1961 provides that if<br />
a loan or deposit is repaid in contravention <strong>of</strong><br />
the provisions <strong>of</strong> section 269T then a penalty equivalent<br />
to the amount <strong>of</strong> such loan or deposit repaid may be<br />
levied by the Joint commissioner.<br />
152
8/23/2011<br />
Clause 24.(c) Whether a certificate has been obtained from the<br />
assessee regarding taking or accepting loan or deposit, or repayment<br />
<strong>of</strong> the same through an account payee cheque or an account payee<br />
bank draft. [Yes/No]<br />
The particulars (i) to (iv) at (b) and the Certificate at (c) above need<br />
not be given in the case <strong>of</strong> a repayment <strong>of</strong> any loan or deposit taken<br />
or accepted from Government, Government company, banking<br />
company or a corporation established by a Central, State or<br />
Provincial Act.<br />
Clause 25. (a) Details <strong>of</strong> brought forward loss or depreciation<br />
allowance, in the following manner, to the extent available :<br />
Audit Procedures: The Tax auditor to study the assessment records<br />
i.e. income tax returns filed, assessment orders, appellate orders and<br />
rectification / revisied orders and trace the amounts <strong>of</strong> loss /<br />
allowance from the income tax returns and the assessment orders.<br />
153
8/23/2011<br />
Clause 25 (b) whether a change in shareholding <strong>of</strong> the company has taken place in<br />
the previous year due to which the losses incurred prior to the previous year<br />
cannot be allowed to be carried forward in terms <strong>of</strong> section 79<br />
Statute: Notwithstanding anything contained in Chapter, where a change in<br />
shareholding has taken place in a previous year in the case <strong>of</strong> a company, not<br />
being a company in which the public are substantially interested, no loss incurred<br />
in any year prior to the previous year shall be carried forward and set <strong>of</strong>f against<br />
the income <strong>of</strong> the previous year unless<br />
(a) on the last day <strong>of</strong> the previous year the shares <strong>of</strong> the company carrying not less<br />
than fifty-one per cent <strong>of</strong> the voting power were beneficially held by persons who<br />
beneficially held shares <strong>of</strong> the company carrying not less than fifty-one per cent<br />
<strong>of</strong> the voting power on the last day <strong>of</strong> the year or years in which the loss was<br />
incurred<br />
Audit Procedures: The Tax Auditor to enquire with the management and review<br />
statutory records <strong>of</strong> the entity to ascertain whether there is a change in<br />
shareholding <strong>of</strong> the company and report accordingly<br />
Clause 25(b) - Change in shareholding <strong>of</strong> the company and carry<br />
forward <strong>of</strong> the losses u/s 79 <strong>of</strong> the Act.<br />
Business loss cannot be carried forward and set <strong>of</strong>f in the<br />
previous year in which a change in shareholding takes place<br />
in case <strong>of</strong> a company in which public are not substantially<br />
interested , if on the last day <strong>of</strong> the previous year in which<br />
the change in shareholding took place and on the last day <strong>of</strong><br />
the previous year in which the loss was incurred, the shares<br />
<strong>of</strong> the company carrying not less than 51% <strong>of</strong> the voting<br />
power were not beneficially held by the same persons.<br />
154
8/23/2011<br />
Clause 26. Section-wise details <strong>of</strong> deductions, if any,<br />
admissible under Chapter VIA.<br />
Audit Procedures: Tax Auditor to perform corroborative<br />
inquiry with the entity to ascertain if there are any Deductions<br />
i. In respect <strong>of</strong> certain Payments<br />
ii. In respect <strong>of</strong> certain Incomes<br />
iii. Others<br />
Tax auditor to scrutinize books <strong>of</strong> account and other documents<br />
for ascertaining value <strong>of</strong> deductions under Chapter VIA<br />
Clause 27. (a) Whether the assessee has complied with the provisions <strong>of</strong><br />
Chapter XVII-B regarding deduction <strong>of</strong> tax at source and regarding the<br />
payment there<strong>of</strong> to the credit <strong>of</strong> the Central Government. [Yes/No]<br />
The newly inserted clause 27 is different from the earlier clause.<br />
In the earlier clause the requirement was with reference to the<br />
tax deducted at source but not paid to the credit <strong>of</strong> the Central<br />
Government in accordance with the provisions <strong>of</strong> Chapter XVII-<br />
B. The new clause requires reporting on the compliance with the<br />
provisions <strong>of</strong> Chapter XVII-B regarding deduction <strong>of</strong> tax at<br />
source and payment there<strong>of</strong> to the credit <strong>of</strong> the Central<br />
Government. Thus, the scope <strong>of</strong> reporting under the new clause<br />
is much wider.<br />
This reporting requirement is to be read with the specific non<br />
compliances stated under clause (b).<br />
155
8/23/2011<br />
If the provisions <strong>of</strong> Chapter XVII-B<br />
have not been complied with, give<br />
the following details, namely:<br />
(i)<br />
(ii)<br />
Tax deductible and not deducted at<br />
all<br />
Shortfall on account <strong>of</strong> lesser<br />
deduction than required to be<br />
deducted<br />
Amount<br />
…………<br />
…………<br />
(iii) Tax deducted late …………<br />
(iv)<br />
Tax deducted but not paid to the<br />
credit<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Central Government<br />
…………<br />
Audit Procedures: Tax Auditor to test the controls instilled by the entity for<br />
appropriate deduction <strong>of</strong> tax a source. Tax auditor also to obtain and verify details<br />
<strong>of</strong> payment <strong>of</strong> TDS deducted, for timely payment, with TDS returns<br />
Clause 28(a) In the case <strong>of</strong> a trading concern, give quantitative<br />
details <strong>of</strong> principal items <strong>of</strong> goods traded:<br />
i. opening stock;<br />
ii.<br />
purchases during the previous year;<br />
iii.<br />
iv.<br />
sales during the previous year;<br />
closing stock;<br />
v. shortage/excess, if any.<br />
156
8/23/2011<br />
Clause 28(b) In the case <strong>of</strong> a manufacturing concern, give<br />
quantitative details <strong>of</strong> the principal items <strong>of</strong> raw materials,<br />
finished products and by-products :<br />
A. Raw materials :<br />
i. opening stock;<br />
ii. purchases during the previous year;<br />
iii. consumption during the previous year;<br />
iv. sales during the previous year;<br />
v. closing stock;<br />
vi. yield <strong>of</strong> finished products;<br />
vii. percentage <strong>of</strong> yield;<br />
viii. shortage/excess, if any.<br />
Clause 28(b) In the case <strong>of</strong> a manufacturing concern, give<br />
quantitative details <strong>of</strong> the principal items <strong>of</strong> raw materials,<br />
finished products and by-products :<br />
B. Finished products/By-products :<br />
i. opening stock;<br />
ii. purchases during the previous year;<br />
iii. quantity manufactured during the previous year;<br />
iv. sales during the previous year;<br />
v. closing stock;<br />
vi. shortage/excess, if any.<br />
*Information may be given to the extent available.<br />
157
8/23/2011<br />
Audit Procedures:<br />
Tax Auditor to obtain certificates from the assessee in respect <strong>of</strong><br />
principal items <strong>of</strong> goods traded, manufactured ( raw materials,<br />
finished goods and by-products).<br />
Auditor to verify the figures reported on a sample basis, in order<br />
to satisfy himself <strong>of</strong> the as to the correctness <strong>of</strong> the figures<br />
furnished<br />
Issues on Clause – 28<br />
“Principal Items:-Items constitute more than 10% <strong>of</strong><br />
the aggregate value<strong>of</strong> purchase, consumption or<br />
turnover.<br />
Report only Principal Itemsunder this clause<br />
Clause (a) –Applicable on Trading concern.<br />
Clause (b) –Applicable on Manufacturing concern.<br />
The Information about (vi),(vii) & (viii) <strong>of</strong> sub clause A <strong>of</strong><br />
(b), to the extent <strong>of</strong> availability <strong>of</strong> information in the<br />
record.<br />
158
8/23/2011<br />
Where stock audit has been undertaken, certified<br />
documents would be required both as regards stock as<br />
well as shortages.<br />
Clause 29. In the case <strong>of</strong> a domestic company, details <strong>of</strong> tax on<br />
distributed pr<strong>of</strong>its under section 115-O in the following form :—<br />
a) total amount <strong>of</strong> distributed pr<strong>of</strong>its;<br />
b) total tax paid thereon;<br />
c) dates <strong>of</strong> payment with amounts<br />
Audit Procedures:<br />
Tax Auditor to verify the statutory records / minutes to ascertain the<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>its distributed. Auditor to verify the tax paid thereon and<br />
the date <strong>of</strong> payment, on the basis <strong>of</strong> duly received challan and books <strong>of</strong><br />
account.<br />
Note: Dividend Distribution Tax to be paid @ 16.61%within 14 days <strong>of</strong><br />
declaration/distribution or payment whichever is earlier.<br />
159
8/23/2011<br />
Issues on Clause - 29<br />
Sec 115-O Tax on distributed pr<strong>of</strong>its <strong>of</strong> Domestic<br />
Companies. The special levy at the prescribed rate, on the<br />
amt <strong>of</strong> dividend declared, distributed or paid (interim or<br />
other wise) out <strong>of</strong> current Pr<strong>of</strong>its or accumulated Pr<strong>of</strong>its.<br />
This tax shall be payable even if no Income tax is payable<br />
by such Company on its total Income.<br />
“Dividend”means dividend under clause (22) <strong>of</strong> Sec 2<br />
exclusive <strong>of</strong> sub clause (e) advance or loan out <strong>of</strong><br />
accumulated pr<strong>of</strong>it or shareholders etc.<br />
The Date <strong>of</strong> Payment should be verified from the<br />
Challans and Books <strong>of</strong> A/cs etc.<br />
Tax u/s 115-O should be deposited within 15 days <strong>of</strong> date<br />
<strong>of</strong> declaration/ distribution or payment which ever is<br />
earlier.<br />
The tax rate on dividend distributed u/s 115-O is 15%.<br />
The tax auditor need not go into the computation <strong>of</strong><br />
distributed pr<strong>of</strong>its but to report the amount actually<br />
distributed.<br />
160
8/23/2011<br />
30. 30.) Whether any cost audit was carried out, if yes, enclose a copy <strong>of</strong><br />
the report <strong>of</strong> such audit [See section 139(9)]<br />
31. Whether any audit was conducted under the Central Excise Act,1944,<br />
if yes, enclose a copy <strong>of</strong> the report <strong>of</strong> such audit.<br />
Audit Procedures:<br />
The tax auditor to ascertain from the management whether an audit<br />
was carried out and if yes enclose a copy <strong>of</strong> the report <strong>of</strong> such audit.<br />
Where an audit may have been ordered and is not completed by the<br />
time the tax auditor gives his report, he has to state the same in his<br />
report.<br />
Issues on Clause - 30<br />
Enclose the copy <strong>of</strong> Cost Audit Report under Sec 233B <strong>of</strong><br />
the companies Act 1956 (if conducted such Audit).<br />
The Auditor need not express any opinion if such Audit is<br />
ordered and not conducted.<br />
The Auditor state the fact if such Audit is not completed<br />
by the time <strong>of</strong> his Audit Report.<br />
Make note <strong>of</strong> any material observation made in such<br />
Report.<br />
Give information only for that Cost Audit Report which<br />
falls within the relevant Previous Year.<br />
161
8/23/2011<br />
Issues on Clause - 31<br />
Attached the Audit report <strong>of</strong> Audit conducted under<br />
Central Excise Act, 1944 (if any).<br />
The auditor should make note <strong>of</strong> any material<br />
observation made in such report.<br />
If such audit is not completed by the time <strong>of</strong> his audit<br />
report –mention the fact.<br />
Enclose the copy <strong>of</strong> such report <strong>of</strong> Latest Year.<br />
If Excise Audit Report is not enclosed, the return cannot<br />
be considered as defective return under Sec 139(9).<br />
32.) Accounting ratios with calculations as follows :—<br />
a) Gross pr<strong>of</strong>it/Turnover;<br />
b) Net pr<strong>of</strong>it/Turnover;<br />
c) Stock-in-trade/Turnover;<br />
d) Material consumed/Finished goods produced.<br />
Audit Procedures:<br />
The Tax auditor to verify the ratios. The tax auditor should assign<br />
meaning to the terms used in the above ratios having due regard to<br />
the generally accepted accounting principles. Ratios mentioned in<br />
this clause are to be calculated in terms <strong>of</strong> value only.<br />
162
8/23/2011<br />
Issues on Clause -32<br />
Calculate ratios for manufacturing or trading concern in<br />
terms <strong>of</strong> value only.<br />
Calculate Ratios for the business as a whole and not<br />
product wise.<br />
If Closing stock is Nil, this sub clause (c) is not applicable.<br />
Stock -in –trade include only closing stock <strong>of</strong> finished<br />
goods not stock <strong>of</strong> raw material & work –in –progress.<br />
Overall G.P Ratio is enough if gross pr<strong>of</strong>it from each<br />
product is different.<br />
Depreciation on Plant & Machinery considered for<br />
valuation <strong>of</strong> Finished goods [AS-2 (revised)]<br />
Depreciation on P&M should be deduct to arrive at gross<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>it.<br />
Exclude extraordinary items for calculation <strong>of</strong> ratios<br />
unless give material effect [AS 5, AS(IT) II].<br />
163
8/23/2011<br />
Take the value <strong>of</strong> Sales, Purchase & Inventories before the<br />
Statutory Adjustment (<strong>of</strong> Sec 145A).<br />
In case <strong>of</strong> Share broker<br />
i) Dealing for Commission – Calculate Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it Ratio<br />
ii)Doing Business – Calculate Gross Pr<strong>of</strong>it Ratio<br />
Case Law<br />
N.C. Budharaja & Co, (1993) 204 ITR 412(SC)<br />
In this Case Hon‘ble Supreme Court decided that<br />
construction <strong>of</strong> tunnels, bridges, dams etc is only a<br />
Service activity and it cannot amount to manufacturing<br />
activity.<br />
U/s 271B, if a person fails to get his accounts audited as required<br />
under section 44AB or to furnish the report <strong>of</strong> such audit, then:<br />
The Penalty imposed shall be, lower <strong>of</strong><br />
½ % <strong>of</strong> sales or gross receipts<br />
Rs 1,50,000/-<br />
NO PENALTY IS IMPOSABLE U/S 271B, IF THE<br />
ASSESSEE PROVES THAT THERE WAS A REASONABLE<br />
CAUSE FOR THE FAILURE..<br />
164
8/23/2011<br />
“Reasonable cause"<br />
<br />
Some <strong>of</strong> the instances where Tribunals/Courts have accepted<br />
as "reasonable cause" are as follows :<br />
a) Resignation <strong>of</strong> the tax auditor and consequent delay<br />
b) Bona fide interpretation <strong>of</strong> the term `turnover' based on expert<br />
advice<br />
c) Death or physical inability <strong>of</strong> the partner in charge <strong>of</strong> the<br />
accounts<br />
d) Labour problems such as strike, lock out for a long period, etc.<br />
e) Loss <strong>of</strong> accounts because <strong>of</strong> fire, theft, etc. beyond the control<br />
<strong>of</strong> the assessee<br />
f) Non-availability <strong>of</strong> accounts on account <strong>of</strong> seizure<br />
g) Natural calamities, commotion, etc.<br />
Penalty u/s 277A<br />
Falsification <strong>of</strong> book <strong>of</strong> accounts or documents etc.<br />
A person shall be Punishable with rigorous imprisonment ,<br />
which may extend from 3 months to 3 years and shall be<br />
liable to fine if following conditions are satisfied:<br />
‣ he willfully and with intent to enable any other person<br />
(assessee) to evade any tax or interest or penalty chargeable<br />
and impossible under Income Tax Act<br />
‣ he makes or causes to be made, any entry or statement in<br />
any books or other documents relevant for any proceedings<br />
under the Act which is false.<br />
‣ he knows it to be false or does not believe it to be true.<br />
No such other prosecution shall be launched by any income<br />
tax authority without prior permission <strong>of</strong> the CIT <strong>of</strong><br />
Appropriate authority.<br />
330<br />
165
8/23/2011<br />
Conclusion<br />
Action on incomplete audit reports<br />
1. Incomplete Information/Non Commitable replies<br />
‣ Report by AO to Commissioner <strong>of</strong> IT<br />
2. If pr<strong>of</strong>essional negligence is reflected<br />
‣ Initiation <strong>of</strong> Disciplinary proceedings<br />
(with the approval <strong>of</strong> CCIT)<br />
331<br />
166