15.06.2015 Views

Download - Bangalore Branch of SIRC

Download - Bangalore Branch of SIRC

Download - Bangalore Branch of SIRC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

8/23/2011<br />

ISSUES IN TAX AUDIT U/S. 44AB AND U/S. 44AD<br />

AND CLAUSE TO CLAUSE ANALYSIS OF FORM<br />

NO 3CD<br />

CA NAVEEN KHARIWAL G.<br />

B.COM,FCA<br />

9880683725<br />

Finance Act, 1984<br />

Hon. Finance Minister:<br />

“Tax Audit intended to ensure that the books<br />

<strong>of</strong> account and other records are properly<br />

maintained and faithfully reflect the true<br />

income <strong>of</strong> the taxpayer”<br />

1


8/23/2011<br />

Circular No. 387 dt 06-07-1984<br />

A proper audit for tax purposes would ensure:<br />

That books <strong>of</strong> accounts and other records are<br />

properly maintained<br />

That they faithfully reflect the income <strong>of</strong> the taxpayer<br />

Claims <strong>of</strong> deductions are correctly made by him<br />

Circular No. 387 dt 06-07-1984<br />

Such audit would also help in checking<br />

practices<br />

fraudulent<br />

Facilitate administration <strong>of</strong> tax laws by proper presentation<br />

<strong>of</strong> accounts<br />

Considerable saving <strong>of</strong> time <strong>of</strong> the AO in carrying out<br />

routine verifications<br />

Checking correctness <strong>of</strong> totals and verifying<br />

purchase and sales are properly vouched<br />

whether<br />

2


8/23/2011<br />

[Audit <strong>of</strong> accounts <strong>of</strong> certain persons carrying on business or<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ession.<br />

44AB. Every person,—<br />

(a)<br />

carrying on business shall, if his total sales, turnover or gross<br />

receipts, as the case may be, in business exceed or exceeds 6<br />

[sixty lakh rupees] in any previous year; or<br />

(b)<br />

carrying on pr<strong>of</strong>ession shall, if his gross receipts in pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />

exceed 8 [fifteen lakh rupees] in any [previous year; or<br />

(c) carrying on the business shall, if the pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains from the<br />

business are deemed to be the pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains <strong>of</strong> such person<br />

under [section 44AE ] [or section 44BB or section 44BBB], as<br />

the case may be, and he has claimed his income to be lower than<br />

the pr<strong>of</strong>its or gains so deemed to be the pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains <strong>of</strong> his<br />

business, as the case may be, in any [previous year; or]]<br />

(d) carrying on the business shall, if the pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains from the<br />

business are deemed to be the pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains <strong>of</strong> such person<br />

under section 44AD and he has claimed such income to be lower<br />

than the pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains so deemed to be the pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains<br />

<strong>of</strong> his business and his income exceeds the maximum amount<br />

which is not chargeable to income-tax in any previous year,]<br />

3


8/23/2011<br />

get his accounts <strong>of</strong> such previous year audited by an accountant<br />

before the specified date and [furnish by] that date the report <strong>of</strong><br />

such audit in the prescribed form duly signed and verified by<br />

such accountant and setting forth such particulars as may be<br />

prescribed :<br />

Provided further that] in a case where such person is required by<br />

or under any other law to get his accounts audited, it shall be<br />

sufficient compliance with the provisions <strong>of</strong> this section if such<br />

person gets the accounts <strong>of</strong> such business or pr<strong>of</strong>ession audited<br />

under such law before the specified date and [furnishes by] that<br />

date the report <strong>of</strong> the audit as required under such other law and a<br />

further report [by an accountant] in the form prescribed under<br />

this section.<br />

Explanation.—For the purposes <strong>of</strong> this section,—<br />

(i) ―accountant‖ shall have the same meaning as in the<br />

Explanation below sub-section (2) <strong>of</strong> section 288;<br />

[(ii) ―specified date‖, in relation to the accounts <strong>of</strong> the assessee<br />

<strong>of</strong> the previous year relevant to an assessment year, means the<br />

[30th day <strong>of</strong> September] <strong>of</strong> the assessment year.]]<br />

4


8/23/2011<br />

Liability <strong>of</strong> Tax Audit<br />

A charitable trust , cooperative society etc., though their<br />

income may be exempt, even if turnover exceed the<br />

threshold limit, they should get their account audited.<br />

If income <strong>of</strong> an assessee is below the taxable limit, he will<br />

also liable to get his account audited, if the turnover in<br />

business exceed the threshold limit.<br />

Section 44AB not applicable to assessee covered us 44B<br />

and 44BBA.<br />

‣ A non-resident is also required to get his accounts<br />

audited and to furnish report under sec 44AB, but<br />

only pertaining to Indian operations.<br />

‣ An agriculturist is not required to get his accounts<br />

audited u/s 44AB even though the total sales <strong>of</strong><br />

agricultural products may exceed Rs 60 lakhs.<br />

5


8/23/2011<br />

Total Sales, Turnover or Gross Receipts<br />

‣Not defined in Sec. 44AB or any other provision <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Act.<br />

‣Can be interpreted as volume <strong>of</strong> business, total is for all<br />

three expressions.<br />

‣Sale denotes sale <strong>of</strong> movable commodity.<br />

‣Turnover is aggregate amount for which sales effected<br />

or services rendered (as per guidance note <strong>of</strong> ICAI).<br />

‣Gross receipt to include all receipts whether in cash or<br />

kind from carrying <strong>of</strong> business.<br />

‣Sales, turnover & gross receipts should be determined<br />

as per method <strong>of</strong> accounting regularly employed.<br />

ISSUE NO. 1 whether the sales by commission agent or by<br />

person on consignment basis forms part <strong>of</strong> turnover<br />

The position that emerges from ICAI‘s Guidance Note and CBDT‘s<br />

Circular No. 452, dated 17.03.1986 is as under:<br />

If the property in the goods or all significant risks and rewards <strong>of</strong><br />

ownership <strong>of</strong> goods belongs to the commission agent or consignee<br />

immediately before the transfer by him to a third party, then the sales<br />

price received / receivable by the commission agent or consignee shall<br />

form part <strong>of</strong> his sales / turnover.<br />

If the property in the goods or all significant risks and rewards <strong>of</strong><br />

ownership in the goods continue to remain with the principal<br />

(consignor) immediately before the transfer by him, (the commission<br />

agent or consignee) to a third party, then the sales price received /<br />

receivable by the commission agent or consignee shall not form part<br />

<strong>of</strong> the sales / turnover <strong>of</strong> the commission agent or consignee. The sales<br />

price received / receivable by him shall form part <strong>of</strong> the sales /<br />

turnover <strong>of</strong> the principal (consignor).<br />

6


8/23/2011<br />

ISSUE NO. 2 In case <strong>of</strong> share brokers<br />

Share brokers, on purchasing securities on behalf <strong>of</strong> their customers,<br />

do not get them transferred in their names but deliver them to the<br />

customers who get them transferred in their names.<br />

The same is true in case <strong>of</strong> sales also.<br />

The share broker holds the delivery merely on behalf <strong>of</strong> his<br />

customer.<br />

The property in goods does not get transferred to the share brokers.<br />

Only brokerage which is being accounted for in the books <strong>of</strong> account<br />

<strong>of</strong> share brokers should be taken into account for considering the<br />

limits for the purpose <strong>of</strong> section 44AB.<br />

However, in case <strong>of</strong> transactions entered into by share broker on his<br />

personal account, the sale value should also be taken into account for<br />

considering the limit for the purpose <strong>of</strong> section 44AB.<br />

The case <strong>of</strong> a sub-broker is same as that <strong>of</strong> a share broker.<br />

Issue No. 3 - Speculation Transaction 43(5)<br />

It means a transaction, in which a contract for the<br />

purchase or sale <strong>of</strong> any commodity, including stocks<br />

and shares, is periodically or ultimately settled<br />

otherwise than by the actual delivery or transfer <strong>of</strong> the<br />

commodity or scrips.<br />

Thus, in a speculative transaction, the contract for<br />

sale or purchase which is entered into is not<br />

completed by giving or receiving delivery so as to<br />

result in the sale as per value <strong>of</strong> contract note.<br />

7


8/23/2011<br />

The contract is settled otherwise and squared up by<br />

paying out the difference which may be positive or<br />

negative.<br />

As such, in such transaction the difference amount is<br />

'turnover'.<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> an assessee doing speculative<br />

transactions there can be both positive and negative<br />

differences arising by settlement <strong>of</strong> various such<br />

contracts during the year.<br />

Each transaction resulting into whether a positive or<br />

negative difference is an independent transaction.<br />

Further, amount paid on account <strong>of</strong> negative<br />

difference paid is not related to the amount received<br />

on account <strong>of</strong> positive difference.<br />

In such transactions though the contract notes are issued<br />

for full value <strong>of</strong> the purchased or sold asset the entries in<br />

the books <strong>of</strong> account are made only for the differences.<br />

Accordingly, the aggregate <strong>of</strong> both positive and negative<br />

differences is to be considered as the turnover <strong>of</strong> such<br />

transactions for determining the liability to audit vide<br />

section 44AB.<br />

8


8/23/2011<br />

Issue No. 4 - Derivatives, futures and options:<br />

Such transactions are completed without the delivery <strong>of</strong><br />

shares or securities.<br />

These are also squared up by payment <strong>of</strong> differences.<br />

The contract notes are issued for the full value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

asset purchased or sold but entries in the books <strong>of</strong><br />

account are made only for the differences.<br />

The transactions may be squared up any time on or<br />

before the striking date. The buyer <strong>of</strong> the option pays the<br />

premia.<br />

(I)<br />

(II)<br />

(III)<br />

The turnover in such types <strong>of</strong> transactions is to be<br />

determined as follows:<br />

The total <strong>of</strong> favourable and unfavourable differences<br />

shall be taken as turnover.<br />

Premium received on sale <strong>of</strong> options is also to be<br />

included in turnover.<br />

In respect <strong>of</strong> any reverse trades entered, the<br />

difference thereon, should also form part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

turnover.<br />

9


8/23/2011<br />

Issue No. 5 - Delivery based transactions: Where the<br />

transaction for the purchase or sale <strong>of</strong> any commodity<br />

including stocks and shares is delivery based whether<br />

intended or by default, the total value <strong>of</strong> the sales is to be<br />

considered as turnover.<br />

Issue No. 6 - Capital Gains Vs. Business<br />

CBDT‘s Instruction No. 1827 dated 31.08.1989 r.w. Circular<br />

No. 4/2007, dated 15.06.2007.<br />

Depends on facts and circumstances <strong>of</strong> each case taking into<br />

consideration nature, frequency and volume <strong>of</strong> transaction.<br />

Landmark Judgments :<br />

i. CIT v. P.K.N. and Co. Ltd. (1966) 60 ITR 65 (SC).<br />

ii. Saroj Kumar Mazumdar v. CIT (1959) 37 ITR 242 (SC).<br />

iii. CIT v. Sutlej Cotton Mills Supply Agency (1975) 100 ITR 706<br />

(SC).<br />

iv.<br />

CIT (Central), Cal Vs. Associated Industrial Development<br />

Co.(P.) Ltd. [1971] 82 ITR 586 (SC).<br />

v. Venkataswami Naidu & Co.(G) v. CIT (1959) 35 ITR 594<br />

(SC).<br />

10


8/23/2011<br />

The Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR) (288 ITR 641), referring to<br />

the decisions <strong>of</strong> the Supreme Court in Several Cases, has culled out the<br />

following principles:-<br />

(i)<br />

(ii)<br />

―Where a company purchase and sells shares, it must be shown that<br />

they were held as stock-in-trade and that existence <strong>of</strong> the power to<br />

purchase and sell shares in the memorandum <strong>of</strong> association is not<br />

decisive <strong>of</strong> the nature <strong>of</strong> transaction;<br />

The substantial nature <strong>of</strong> transactions, the manner <strong>of</strong> maintaining<br />

books <strong>of</strong> account, the magnitude <strong>of</strong> purchases and sales and the ratio<br />

between purchases and sales and the holding would furnish a good<br />

guide to determine the nature <strong>of</strong> transactions;<br />

(iii) Ordinarily the purchase and sale <strong>of</strong> shares with the motive <strong>of</strong><br />

earning a pr<strong>of</strong>it, would result in the transaction being in the<br />

nature <strong>of</strong> trade / adventure in the nature <strong>of</strong> trade; but where the<br />

object <strong>of</strong> the investment is shares <strong>of</strong> a company is to derive<br />

income by way <strong>of</strong> dividend etc., then the pr<strong>of</strong>its accruing by<br />

change in such investment (by sale <strong>of</strong> shares) will yield capital<br />

gain and not revenue receipt.‖<br />

11


8/23/2011<br />

Board Circular No. 4/2007, dated 15-6-2007<br />

It is possible for tax payer to have two portfolios,<br />

i.e., an investment portfolio comprising <strong>of</strong> securities<br />

which are to be treated as capital assets and a trading<br />

portfolio comprising <strong>of</strong> stock in trade which are to<br />

be treated as trading assets. Where an assessee has<br />

two portfolios, the assessee may have income under<br />

both heads i.e., capital gains as well as business<br />

income.<br />

Issue No. 7 - The following items would not form part <strong>of</strong> "gross<br />

receipts in business” for purposes <strong>of</strong> section 44AB<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> a traveling agent, the amount received from the clients for<br />

payment to the airlines, railways etc. where such amounts are received by<br />

way <strong>of</strong> reimbursement <strong>of</strong> expenses incurred on behalf <strong>of</strong> the client. If,<br />

however, the travel agent is conducting a package tour and charges a<br />

consolidated sum for transportation, boarding and lodging and other<br />

facilities, then the amount received from the members <strong>of</strong> group tour<br />

should form part <strong>of</strong> gross receipts<br />

and<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> an advertising agent, the amount <strong>of</strong> advertising charges<br />

recovered by him from his clients provided these are by way <strong>of</strong><br />

reimbursement. But if the advertising agent books the advertisement<br />

space in bulk and recovers the charges from different clients, the amount<br />

received by him from the clients will not be the same as the charges paid<br />

by him and in such a case the amount recovered by him will form part <strong>of</strong><br />

his gross receipts.<br />

12


8/23/2011<br />

The principle to be applied is that<br />

if the assessee is merely reimbursed for certain expenses<br />

incurred, the same will not form part <strong>of</strong> his gross receipts.<br />

But in the case <strong>of</strong> charges recovered, which are not by way<br />

<strong>of</strong> reimbursement <strong>of</strong> the actual expenses incurred, they will<br />

form part <strong>of</strong> his gross receipts.<br />

Issue No. 8 - An assessee own 4 proprietorship businesses. The<br />

aggregate annual turnover <strong>of</strong> all the concerns exceeds Rs. 60<br />

lakhs but individually each business‘s turnover is below Rs. 60<br />

lakhs. Further, separate books <strong>of</strong> account are maintained for<br />

each business and pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account and balance sheet are<br />

prepared separately.<br />

(a) will tax audit under section 44AB be applicable ?<br />

(b) If yes, should the particulars <strong>of</strong> all busineses be reported in<br />

a single Form No. 3CD ? If so, how ?<br />

(c) Should the tax auditor give a consolidated Form No. 3CD in<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> all the concerns ?<br />

13


8/23/2011<br />

Ans : (a) The requirement <strong>of</strong> tax audit in the case <strong>of</strong> an<br />

assessee is to be determined taking into consideration the<br />

‗sales‘, ‗turnover‘ or ‗gross receipts‘ <strong>of</strong> all the businesses<br />

carried on by him. If the aggregate annual turnover <strong>of</strong> the<br />

four proprietary concerns exceed Rs. 60 lakhs, section<br />

44AB would be clearly applicable.<br />

(b) In regard to audit report and furnishing <strong>of</strong> particulars in<br />

Form Nos. 3CA/3CB and 3CD, there are two possibilities,<br />

Firstly, separate tax auditors may be appointed in respect <strong>of</strong><br />

individual businesses in which case Form Nos. 3CB and 3CD<br />

have to be submitted separately for each business.<br />

Alternatively, one tax auditor may undertake the audit <strong>of</strong> all the<br />

businesses. Here also the tax auditor can prepare Form Nos.<br />

3CA/ 3CB and 3CD separately for each business. The need for<br />

separate forms for each business arises particularly where<br />

reliefs are claimed in respect <strong>of</strong> individual businesses.<br />

14


8/23/2011<br />

(c) However it may be noted that tax audit as such is<br />

conducted in respect <strong>of</strong> an assessee and hence the question<br />

<strong>of</strong> consolidating the separate forms into a single form<br />

assumes importance. Further, without consolidating the<br />

separate Form Nos. 3CD into a single form particulars like<br />

deduction permissible under chapter VIA cannot be given.<br />

Hence it is advisable to prepare a consolidated form. The<br />

auditor consolidating the report / form can rely on the work<br />

<strong>of</strong> the other auditor (AAS -10) (Revised).<br />

Issue No. 9 - (i) The assessee is the proprietor <strong>of</strong> the following<br />

businesses:<br />

(a) cloth business at <strong>Bangalore</strong> – Sales Rs. 30 Lakhs.<br />

(b) yarn business at Chennai – sales Rs. 25 lakhs.<br />

(c) hosiery business at Calicut – Sales Rs. 22 lakhs.<br />

Separate sets <strong>of</strong> books are maintained at each <strong>of</strong> the above places.<br />

The business are carried on in different names viz., (a) Vinay<br />

Cloth Stores (b) Nagaraj Yarn Merchants and (c) Natesh hosiery<br />

Mart. Should the assessee get his accounts audited under section<br />

44AB in respect <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the above proprietary concerns ?<br />

15


8/23/2011<br />

(ii) If, in the above case, the hosiery business is carried on by the<br />

assessee‘s wife from the funds gifted by the assessee and the<br />

income <strong>of</strong> the business is includible in the income <strong>of</strong> the assessee<br />

under section 64, what will be te position <strong>of</strong> audit under section<br />

44AB ?<br />

(iii) If the assessee is a partner in (a) M/s. A & Co., (Sales Rs. 45<br />

lakhs) (b) M/s. B & Co., (Sales Rs. 48 lakhs) and (c) M/s. D. &<br />

Co., (Sales Rs. 40 lakhs) and he has 60% share in each <strong>of</strong> the<br />

above firms, should each <strong>of</strong> the above firms get its accounts<br />

audited under section 44AB ? Should the asseessee who is a<br />

partner in the above firms get his personal accounts audited under<br />

section 44AB as the aggregate <strong>of</strong> his share in the turnover <strong>of</strong> the<br />

three firms exceeds Rs. 60 lakhs.<br />

16


8/23/2011<br />

Ans: (i) Even if the assessee carries on business at different<br />

places in different names and deals in different commodities, it<br />

will be necessary to get the accounts audited if the aggregate<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> sales <strong>of</strong> all the businesses exceed Rs. 60 lakhs. In the<br />

given case the total sales <strong>of</strong> the three businesses amount to Rs.<br />

77 lakhs Therefore, it will be necessary to get the accounts <strong>of</strong><br />

all the three concerns belonging to this assessee audited. It may<br />

be noted that the emphasis is on the total sales. Therefore, even<br />

if the assessee carries on one or more businesses the sales <strong>of</strong> all<br />

the businesses will be taken into consideration.<br />

Ans: (ii) If the business is carried on by the wife <strong>of</strong> the<br />

assessee, it cannot be said that it is carried on by the assessee<br />

merely because the income from the business is includible in<br />

the income <strong>of</strong> the assessee under section 64. Therefore, the wife<br />

<strong>of</strong> the assessee carrying on hosiery business with turnover <strong>of</strong><br />

Rs. 22 lakhs will not be required to get the accounts audited<br />

under section 44AB.<br />

17


8/23/2011<br />

Ans: (iii) Each firm is a separate person / assessee for the<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> Income-tax Act. Therefore, the figures <strong>of</strong> sales <strong>of</strong><br />

each firm will have to be considered. In the given case, it will<br />

not be necessary for A & Co., B & Co., or C & Co., to get their<br />

accounts audited as the sales <strong>of</strong> any one <strong>of</strong> these firms do not<br />

exceed Rs. 60 Lakhs.<br />

Similarly, any partner <strong>of</strong> these firms will not be required to get<br />

his personal accounts audited if he is not carrying on any<br />

personal business having sales / turnover exceeding Rs. 60<br />

lakhs. The sales / turnover <strong>of</strong> the firms in which he is a partner<br />

cannot be taken into consideration for this purpose.<br />

Issue No. 10 - (i) A & Co. (Partnership firm) is appointed as<br />

selling agent <strong>of</strong> a textile mill. The firm canvasses orders for the<br />

mill. The goods are despatched by the mill to the customers<br />

introduced by A & Co. The sales bills are prepared by the mill.<br />

A & Co., recovers the sale proceeds and remits the same to the<br />

mill. The total sales organised by A & Co., during the year<br />

ended 31.03.2011 amounted to Rs. 20 crores. The commission<br />

@ 1% earned by A & co., amounted to Rs. 20 lakhs. Should A<br />

& Co., get their accounts audited under section 44AB ?<br />

18


8/23/2011<br />

(ii) In the above case if A & Co., had purchased cloth for Rs.<br />

55 lakhs and sold cloth worth Rs. 50 lakhs will the provisions<br />

<strong>of</strong> section 44AB apply ?<br />

Ans : (i) In this case, A & Co. is a selling agent <strong>of</strong> the textile<br />

mill. From the facts stated in the above issue, it is evident that<br />

the selling agent does not become the owner <strong>of</strong> the goods. The<br />

ownership continues to be that <strong>of</strong> the mill and it passes from the<br />

mill to the customer. The goods are despatched directly by the<br />

mill to the customers and sales bills are prepared by the mill.<br />

Therefore, the amount <strong>of</strong> the sales made by the mill<br />

cannot be taken into consideration for determining the<br />

liability <strong>of</strong> A & Co., to get its accounts audited under<br />

section 44AB. Since the commission income <strong>of</strong> A & Co.<br />

is only Rs. 20 lakhs and if there are any sales or other<br />

trading receipts <strong>of</strong> A & Co., which are less than Rs. 40<br />

lakhs, it will not be required to get its accounts audited<br />

under section 44AB.<br />

19


8/23/2011<br />

(ii) As stated above, because the commission income <strong>of</strong><br />

A & Co. is Rs. 20 lakhs and the sales <strong>of</strong> cloth amount to<br />

Rs. 50 lakhs the total turnover and gross receipts <strong>of</strong> A &<br />

Co. will exceed Rs. 60 lakhs and it will be necessary for<br />

it to get its accounts audited under section 44AB.<br />

Issue No. 11 - Mr. ‗B‘ has received goods worth Rs. 50 lakhs on<br />

consignment from P & Co. These goods were sold by Mr. ‗B‘ at<br />

Bombay for Rs. 62 lakhs. He has issued his own bills disclosing<br />

therein that the goods belong to P & Co. On completion <strong>of</strong> sales<br />

he had rendered accounts sales to P & Co. and remitted the sale<br />

proceeds after deducting Rs. 1 lakh being expenses incurred for<br />

sales and Rs. 50,000/- being his commission. For sales-tax<br />

purposes, he is required to record the above sales in his sales<br />

records. Should Mr. ‗B‘ get his accounts audited under section 44<br />

AB ?<br />

20


8/23/2011<br />

Ans : In this case, Mr. B is acting as consignment agent<br />

for P & Co. The sales made by Mr. B at Bombay for Rs.<br />

62 lakhs are made on behalf <strong>of</strong> P & Co. These sales<br />

cannot be considered as sales <strong>of</strong> Mr. B. He is only<br />

entitled to his commission <strong>of</strong> Rs. 50,000/- which will<br />

form part <strong>of</strong> his gross receipts. Therefore, Mr. B. will not<br />

be required to get his accounts audited under section 44<br />

AB if his total sales and gross receipts including<br />

commission income <strong>of</strong> Rs. 50,000/- does not exceed Rs.<br />

60 lakhs.<br />

Issue No. 12 - Sankhla industries is engaged in the manufacture <strong>of</strong><br />

electrical goods. The total sales / turnover exceeds Rs. 60 lakhs. It<br />

owns the following industrial units.<br />

(i) Enterprise engaged in infrastructure development deduction<br />

available under section 80IA.<br />

(ii) Industrial Unit in a backward are – deduction under section<br />

80IB.<br />

If the assessee gets its accounts audited under section 44AB, is it<br />

necessary to get separate audit reports under section 80IA(7) and<br />

80IB(13) read with 80IA(7)? In case audit is conducted under section<br />

80IA (7) and / or 80IB (13) read with section 80IA(7) which form<br />

should be used, Form No. 3CA or 3CB.<br />

21


8/23/2011<br />

Ans: Yes. It will be necessary to get a separate audit report under<br />

section 80(IA)(7) and 80(IB)(13) for each <strong>of</strong> the industrial unit.<br />

The finance Act, 2002 has amended these provisions making it<br />

mandatory for all assessees including companies and cooperative<br />

societies to submit a report under these sections. It is to be noted<br />

that audit report under section 80(IA)(7) and 80(IB) (13) is in<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> an industrial unit covered by the relevant provision<br />

whereas audit under section 44AB is in respect <strong>of</strong> an assessee<br />

covered by any <strong>of</strong> the clauses (a), (b) or (c).<br />

It is to be clarified that audit report in such cases will be<br />

in form No. 3CB in case the accounts <strong>of</strong> the assessee<br />

have not been audited under any other law such as<br />

Companies Act or Cooperative Societies Act etc. Audit<br />

under section 80(IA) or 80(IB) <strong>of</strong> the Income-tax Act<br />

will not be considered as audit under any other law. The<br />

requirement <strong>of</strong> section 44AB is a general one covering<br />

the overall position <strong>of</strong> the accounts <strong>of</strong> the assessee.<br />

22


8/23/2011<br />

This applies to the accounts <strong>of</strong> the assessee for the<br />

relevant year covering the results <strong>of</strong> all the industrial<br />

units situated at different places. Therefore, when the<br />

sales/turnover <strong>of</strong> all the units put together exceeds Rs.<br />

60lakhs the assessee will have to get the audit conducted<br />

under section 44AB and obtain the audit report in Form<br />

No. 3CB.<br />

Non Resident-Indian Operations:<br />

Issue No. 13- A foreign company has some business<br />

income from India. It has no permanent establishment<br />

in India. Since the income <strong>of</strong> the foreign company<br />

chargeable under the Income tax Act can not be<br />

precisely determined, the same has been assessed on the<br />

basis provided in Rule 10 <strong>of</strong> the Income tax Rules,<br />

1962. There are no separate books <strong>of</strong> account for Indian<br />

business. What are the tax audit report requirements?<br />

Should Form No. 3CD be submitted in respect <strong>of</strong> such a<br />

foreign company?<br />

23


8/23/2011<br />

Ans: Paragraph 6.3 clarifies that section 44AB does not make any<br />

distinction between a resident and a no-resident. Therefore, a nonresident<br />

assessee is also required to get his accounts audited and to<br />

furnish such report under section 44AB if his turnover exceeds the<br />

prescribed limits. This audit, however, would be confined only to the<br />

Indian operations carried out by the non-resident assessee since he is<br />

not chargeable to Income- tax in India in respect <strong>of</strong> income accruing or<br />

arising or received outside India. In the given issue, since there are no<br />

separate books <strong>of</strong> account for the Indian business, the tax auditor has to<br />

necessarily obtain relevant information from the overseas auditor for<br />

the purpose <strong>of</strong> enabling him to make the audit report and also furnish<br />

the necessary particulars.<br />

So far as audit report is concerned, Form No. 3CB should be used<br />

even if the accounts <strong>of</strong> the non-resident have been subject to audit<br />

by an auditor qualified to audit the accounts under the relevant<br />

statute <strong>of</strong> the country. It is also necessary to segregate the data<br />

relating to income chargeable under the Income-tax Act. The tax<br />

auditor has to make appropriate disclosures based on AAS-<br />

10(Revised) ―Using the work <strong>of</strong> another auditor‖.<br />

24


8/23/2011<br />

Issue No. 14 - Surrender <strong>of</strong> Stocks:<br />

A survey was conducted during the financial year<br />

2010/11 and the assessee surrendered stocks worth <strong>of</strong><br />

Rs. 22 lakhs. During the financial year 2010/11 the<br />

assessee is having a turnover <strong>of</strong> Rs. 49 lakhs. Should<br />

the value <strong>of</strong> surrendered stock be included in the<br />

turnover for determining the applicability <strong>of</strong> section<br />

44AB?<br />

Ans: The surrender <strong>of</strong> stock worth Rs. 22 lakhs during the survey<br />

does not mean that the turnover <strong>of</strong> the assessee for the relevant<br />

year exceeded Rs. 60 lakhs. Therefore, the value <strong>of</strong> surrendered<br />

stock cannot be treated as part <strong>of</strong> turnover for determining the<br />

applicability <strong>of</strong> section 44AB. It is also significant to note that<br />

paragraph 5.18 clarifies that section 44AB applies only if the<br />

turnover exceeds the prescribed limit according to the books<br />

maintained by the assessee.<br />

25


8/23/2011<br />

Issue No. 15 - Additional sales found as a result <strong>of</strong> search<br />

In Brijlal Goyal v. Asstt. CIT [2004] 88 ITD 413 (Delhi),<br />

The Tribunal held as under :<br />

―….. Admittedly, the additional sales found as a result <strong>of</strong> search, was not<br />

recorded in the books <strong>of</strong> account regularly kept in the course <strong>of</strong><br />

business by the appellant. Merely because the appellant accepted the<br />

additional sales for the purpose <strong>of</strong> assessment <strong>of</strong> the relevant year on<br />

the basis <strong>of</strong> entries in the seized documents, the same would not<br />

constitute accounts <strong>of</strong> the appellant maintained in the regular course <strong>of</strong><br />

business and on that basis alone liability cannot be fastened on the<br />

assessee by holding him to have committed the default.<br />

Issue No. 16 - Sale <strong>of</strong> car:<br />

Sale <strong>of</strong> car is not included in sales for the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

tax audit but according to some Supreme Court<br />

judgments under Sales tax Act, the sale <strong>of</strong> a car is to be<br />

treated as sales and sales tax has to be charged. Then,<br />

why should the same be excluded for tax audit<br />

purposes?<br />

26


8/23/2011<br />

Ans: The sale <strong>of</strong> car is nothing but a sale <strong>of</strong> capital asset. The<br />

expression ‗total sales‘, ‗turnover‘ or ‗gross receipts‘ used in<br />

clause (a) <strong>of</strong> section 44AB should be understood in the context <strong>of</strong><br />

the expression ‗in business‘ appearing immediately thereafter in<br />

that very clause. The definition <strong>of</strong> ‗sales‘ under the Sales-tax Act<br />

<strong>of</strong> any state is not relevant for determining the applicability <strong>of</strong><br />

section 44AB. Paragraphs 5.8(vi) and 5.13 (i) clarify that the sale<br />

proceeds <strong>of</strong> fixed assets would not from part <strong>of</strong> turnover gross<br />

receipts since these are not held for resale.<br />

Issue No. 17 - Write back:<br />

As a result <strong>of</strong> writing back the account <strong>of</strong> a creditor, the<br />

turnover/gross receipt has exceeded Rs. 60 lakhs.<br />

Will the assessee be liable for tax audit?<br />

27


8/23/2011<br />

Ans: Writing back <strong>of</strong> the amount payable to a creditor <strong>of</strong><br />

which a deduction has been claimed is deemed as<br />

income for the purpose <strong>of</strong> section 41(1) <strong>of</strong> the Incometax<br />

Act, 1961. The amount so written back would not<br />

form part <strong>of</strong> gross receipt and as such will not be<br />

includible while determining the quantum for<br />

applicability <strong>of</strong> section 44AB (para 5.13 (xi) <strong>of</strong><br />

guidance note on tax audit revised 2005 edition). It is<br />

also neither sales not turnover.<br />

Issue No. 18 - Inclusion <strong>of</strong> Sales-tax:<br />

16. A, an assessee, provides the following figures:<br />

Sales<br />

Rs. 58 lakhs<br />

Vat tax collected<br />

Rs. 3 Lakhs<br />

Is A liable for tax audit under section 44AB?<br />

28


8/23/2011<br />

Ans: The words ‗sales‘, ‗turnover‘ and gross receipts‘<br />

are commercial terms and they should be construed in<br />

accordance with the method <strong>of</strong> accounting regularly<br />

employed by the assessee. If the Vat tax collected is<br />

credited separately to Vat tax account and payments<br />

there<strong>of</strong> are debited in the same account, they would<br />

not be included in the turnover. (Para 5.5 and 5.6 <strong>of</strong><br />

ICAI‘s guidance note on tax audit revised 2005<br />

edition).<br />

Issue No. 19 - Sales through stalls:<br />

‗AK‘ Pvt. Ltd. is running a departmental store. There are<br />

several stalls. Each stalls belongs to a different person.<br />

According to the arrangement by the stall owners with ‗AK‘<br />

Pvt. Ltd., all sales proceeds are to be collected on the printed<br />

bills <strong>of</strong> ‗AK‘ Pvt. Ltd. The delivery counter is common for all<br />

stall owners and the same is managed by ‗AK‘ Pvt. Ltd The<br />

premises belongs to ‗AK‘ Pvt. Ltd. who takes out insurance and<br />

also makes security arrangements. The proceeds <strong>of</strong> all sales<br />

made by various stall owners are collected by ‗AK‘ Pvt, Ltd.<br />

29


8/23/2011<br />

At the end <strong>of</strong> every week ‗AK‘ Pvt. Ltd. makes up the<br />

sales account <strong>of</strong> each stall owner and after deducting<br />

charges/commission at the agreed rate remits the<br />

balance amount to each stall owners. The total<br />

turnover on the above basis works out to about Rs. 3<br />

crores. However, the income <strong>of</strong> ‗AK‘ Pvt. Ltd. from<br />

charges/commission recovered from the stall owners is<br />

Rs. 30 lakhs. Is ‗AK‘ Pvt. Ltd. liable to get its<br />

accounts audited under section 44AB?<br />

Ans: It will not be necessary for ‗AK‘ Pvt Ltd. To get its<br />

accounts audited under section 44AB. The sales in this case<br />

cannot be considered as the sales <strong>of</strong> ‗AK‘ Pvt. Ltd. These are<br />

sales <strong>of</strong> the stall owners. ‗AK‖ Pvt Ltd. has only undertaken to<br />

render services like providing space, making security<br />

arrangements, taking out insurance, collection <strong>of</strong> sale proceeds<br />

on behalf <strong>of</strong> the stall owners and rendering account to them.<br />

The commission earned for these services does not exceed the<br />

limit <strong>of</strong> Rs. 60 Lakhs prescribed in section 44AB. Therefore,<br />

the provisions <strong>of</strong> section 44AB are not attracted in this case.<br />

30


8/23/2011<br />

Discuss the following issues:<br />

Issue No. 20 - Leasing<br />

a) In the case <strong>of</strong> a company engaged in the business <strong>of</strong> equipment<br />

leasing will the provisions <strong>of</strong> section 44AB for tax audit apply<br />

b) In the case <strong>of</strong> a company engaged in leasing finance, will the<br />

provisions <strong>of</strong> section 44AB for tax audit apply?<br />

c) In the above cases how will the monetary limit <strong>of</strong> Rs. 60 lakhs<br />

for turnover or gross receipts be computed?<br />

d) In the case <strong>of</strong> a company supplying equipment on hire purchase<br />

basis how will the monetary limit <strong>of</strong> Rs. 60 lakhs be computed<br />

for the purpose <strong>of</strong> section 44AB?<br />

Ans: (i) In the case <strong>of</strong> a company engaged in the<br />

business <strong>of</strong> equipment leasing the provisions <strong>of</strong> section<br />

44AB for tax audit will apply if its gross receipts from<br />

lease rent exceed Rs. 60 lakhs.<br />

(ii) In the case <strong>of</strong> a company engaged in the<br />

business <strong>of</strong> leasing finance, the provisions <strong>of</strong> section<br />

44AB for tax audit will apply if its gross receipts from<br />

the leasing finance exceed Rs. 60 Lakhs.<br />

31


8/23/2011<br />

(iii) The monetary limit <strong>of</strong> Rs. 60 lakhs will be computed in the above<br />

cases with reference to lease rent or interest on financing. The value<br />

<strong>of</strong> the equipment given on lease or the amount advanced under<br />

leasing finance cannot be considered for this purpose.<br />

(iv) When equipment is supplied on hire-purchase basis, the sale is<br />

complete when the person taking the equipment exercises his option<br />

to purchase. Therefore, during the years when hire charges (excluding<br />

instalments <strong>of</strong> principal amount) are received by the company, the<br />

figure <strong>of</strong> such charges will from part <strong>of</strong> its gross receipts. When the<br />

purchaser exercises his option to purchase, the price at which the<br />

equipment is sold to him will form part <strong>of</strong> total sales or turnover <strong>of</strong><br />

that year.<br />

Issue No. 21 - Form No. 3CA/3CB:<br />

a) The accounting year <strong>of</strong> an assessee has been changed<br />

from calendar year to April to March. Accordingly, the<br />

accounts have been drawn for the period from January,<br />

2010 to March 31,2011 which have already been<br />

audited for tax audit. Which form <strong>of</strong> audit report<br />

should be used? Form No. 3CA or Form No. 3CB?<br />

Should separate accounts have to be drawn for the<br />

period from 1 st April, 2010 to 31 st March, 2011?<br />

32


8/23/2011<br />

(b) Rule 6G(a) provides that in the case <strong>of</strong> a person who<br />

carries on business or pr<strong>of</strong>ession and who is required by or<br />

under any other law to get his accounts audited the audit<br />

report should be in Form No. 3CA. Under the Companies<br />

Act, all companies are required get their accounts audited.<br />

However the accounting year for the Companies Act can<br />

be different from that <strong>of</strong> the previous year under the<br />

Income tax Act e.g. under the Companies Act it may be,<br />

say, 30 th September. In such cases how can the company<br />

comply with the requirements <strong>of</strong> Form No. 3CA?<br />

Ans: Issues (a) and (b) are answered together. The previous<br />

year for tax purposes shall always be the financial year as<br />

per section 3 <strong>of</strong> the Income-tax Act. Therefore the final<br />

accounts along with tax audit report have to be <strong>of</strong> the<br />

financial year. Accordingly in case the annual accounts<br />

i.e. balance sheet and pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account have not<br />

been audited and certified, it cannot fulfill the<br />

requirement <strong>of</strong> Form No. 3CA which requires the tax<br />

auditor to enclose the ‗audited‘ pr<strong>of</strong>it balance sheet as at<br />

31 st March.<br />

33


8/23/2011<br />

Hence, in such cases the tax payer is required to prepare a separate<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account and balance sheet as at 31 st March and get<br />

the same audited and the tax auditor is to give the report in Form<br />

No. 3CB whereby he is required first to certify the true and fair<br />

view <strong>of</strong> the balance sheet and pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account and furnish<br />

statement <strong>of</strong> particulars in Form No. 3CD.<br />

Though Rule 6G(1)(a) provides that a person who carries on<br />

business or pr<strong>of</strong>ession and who is required by or under any other<br />

law to get his accounts audited the tax audit report should be in<br />

Form No. 3CA, the word ―accounts‖ here has to be interpreted in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> the requirement <strong>of</strong> Form No. 3CA.<br />

―Accounts‖ here will mean the accounts i.e. pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss<br />

account and the balance sheet and tax audit report. In case<br />

the accounts i.e. pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account and balance sheet<br />

with tax audit report has not been audited under any other<br />

law, the correct form will be Form No. 3CB. [Circular No.<br />

561 dated 22.05.1990 vide page 167 <strong>of</strong> guidance note on tax<br />

audit revised 2005 edition.]<br />

34


8/23/2011<br />

Issue No. 22 - Revision <strong>of</strong> Tax Audit Report:<br />

Can a tax auditor revise his tax audit report and Form No.<br />

3CD?<br />

Ans: A tax auditor should exercise extreme care and caution<br />

while discharging his responsibilities. He should ensure that<br />

correct information has been given in Form No. 3CA/3CB<br />

and 3CD. However, if he feels that there is a need for revising<br />

the audit report and / or Form No. 3CD, it is advisable to do<br />

so in a timely manner and he should clearly indicate the<br />

reasons for giving a revised report. Attention is also invited to<br />

paragraph 13. 9 and to the guidance note on revision <strong>of</strong> Audit<br />

Report which deals with this aspect elaborately.<br />

35


8/23/2011<br />

Issue No. 23 - Relying on the work <strong>of</strong> statutory<br />

auditor<br />

(i) A tax auditor does not agree with the treatment given<br />

in the audited financial statements in respect <strong>of</strong> (i)<br />

personal expenses, (ii) capital expenditure, (iii)<br />

valuation <strong>of</strong> stock-in-trade (iv) method <strong>of</strong> accounting<br />

or (v) other matters covered in Form No. 3CD.<br />

(ii) If the statutory auditor has not qualified his audit<br />

report on these matters, can the tax auditor qualify his<br />

report in Form No. 3CA and make appropriate<br />

comments in Form No. 3CD?<br />

Ans: (i) In case where statutory audit under any other law has<br />

been conducted by an auditor other than the tax auditor the<br />

requirement <strong>of</strong> section 44AB read with Rule 6G(1)(a) is to<br />

enclose a report <strong>of</strong> such audit and the tax auditor is required<br />

to furnish statement <strong>of</strong> particulars in Form No. 3CD and<br />

certify that the particulars given in the said Form No. 3CD are<br />

true and correct. The tax auditor is not required to comment<br />

upon the audit report given by the statutory auditor. As such<br />

there will be no requirement on the part <strong>of</strong> tax auditor to<br />

qualify his report in Form No. 3CA.<br />

36


8/23/2011<br />

(ii) The tax auditor, however, has the primary responsibility <strong>of</strong><br />

the verification <strong>of</strong> the particulars prescribed in Form No. 3CD<br />

and he should ensure that the particulars stated are in<br />

conformity with the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Income-tax Act.<br />

Normally the tax auditor should accept the treatment given to<br />

various items in the financial statements which have been<br />

audited by the statutory auditor. If, however, while conducting<br />

tax audit he is unable to agree with the treatment given to a<br />

particular item in the audited financial statement, he should first<br />

ascertain preferably from the statutory auditor, the reasons for his<br />

giving such a treatment in his statement.<br />

It is possible that statutory auditor while considering the items<br />

on (i) personal expenses, (ii) capital expenditure, (iii) valuation<br />

<strong>of</strong> stock and trade, (iv) method <strong>of</strong> accounting or other matter<br />

covered in Form NO.3CD might have dealt with the item from<br />

the angle <strong>of</strong> generally accepted accounting principle or statutory<br />

provisions covering the entity. The responsibility <strong>of</strong> furnishing<br />

true and correct particulars in Form NO.3CD is that <strong>of</strong> the entity.<br />

For this purpose, statutory provision and judicial pronouncement<br />

under tax laws have to be taken into consideration.<br />

37


8/23/2011<br />

The tax auditor should verify and ensure that particulars in<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> the above items such as personal expenses, capital<br />

expenditure, valuation <strong>of</strong> stock and trade, method <strong>of</strong> accounting<br />

etc. are given on the basis <strong>of</strong> explanations above. However, any<br />

difference between the figures given in the audited financial<br />

statements and figures given in Form No.3CD should be<br />

explained by giving appropriate notes. If, however, there is any<br />

difference in the opinion <strong>of</strong> the tax auditor and that <strong>of</strong> the entity<br />

in respect <strong>of</strong> any information furnished in Form No.3CD, the tax<br />

auditor should state both the view points and also the relevant<br />

information. Attention is invited to paragraph 16.3. <strong>of</strong> revised<br />

guidance note on tax audit 2005 edition.<br />

Issue No. 24 – Advance received for services are rendered.<br />

These are liabilities and not part <strong>of</strong> gross receipts until services are<br />

rendered. -<br />

For contrary viewpoint- see Dy. CIT v. Gopal Krishan<br />

Builders.[2004] 91 ITD 124 (Lucknow)(SMC).<br />

The Tribunal held that each and every word used in any statute has<br />

its importance and is used by legislature after a lot <strong>of</strong> deliberations.<br />

38


8/23/2011<br />

The words used in section 44AB: ―total sales‖, ―turnover‖ or<br />

―gross receipts‘ have been used specifically and the scope <strong>of</strong> the<br />

words ‗gross receipts‘ is quite wide otherwise legislature would<br />

have stopped after using the words ‗sales‘ or ‗turnover‘,<br />

Further, these advances were having an element <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it. The<br />

amount was to be adjusted towards the cost <strong>of</strong> flats booked by each<br />

customer and the amounts will have an element <strong>of</strong> construction<br />

cost as well as pr<strong>of</strong>it which might be bigger in proportion when<br />

whole <strong>of</strong> the cost is realized.<br />

What assessees should do to determine applicability <strong>of</strong> tax audit<br />

u/s 44AB is as under (in the light <strong>of</strong> Tribunal‘s decision):<br />

a) In cases <strong>of</strong> business which do not have ―turnover‘ or ―total sales‖<br />

and ―pr<strong>of</strong>essions‖<br />

Determine gross receipts – i.e. total amounts received (including<br />

advances) which have pr<strong>of</strong>it-making quality about them. If ―gross<br />

receipts‘ exceed Rs. 60 lakhs / Rs. 15 lakhs as the case may be, tax<br />

audit is applicable.<br />

39


8/23/2011<br />

b) In cases <strong>of</strong> businesses in manufacturing / trading sector-i.e.<br />

businesses which have ―turnover‖ / ‗sales‖ – The following steps are<br />

necessary:<br />

1. Determine ―Sales‘ / Turnover‘ as per the method <strong>of</strong> accounting<br />

regularly employed by the assessee – (Cash or mercantile system) and<br />

excluding sales tax / duty / other taxes.<br />

2. Determine gross receipts- i.e. total amounts received (including<br />

advances) which have pr<strong>of</strong>it – making quality about them (as per<br />

Tribunal‘s decision above).<br />

3. If ―Sales‖ or ―Turnover‖ or ―Gross receipts‖ exceed Rs. 60 Lakhs, tax<br />

audit is applicable.<br />

c) If there is no sales / turnover / work done or completed<br />

during the financial year but only advances have been received<br />

(to be adjusted against value to be provided by way <strong>of</strong> goods /<br />

services); then if total advances received exceeds Rs. 60 Lakhs /<br />

Rs. 15 Lakhs, as the case may be, tax audit under section 44AB<br />

is applicable.<br />

40


8/23/2011<br />

Special provision for computing pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains <strong>of</strong> business<br />

on presumptive basis.<br />

(1) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in<br />

sections 28 to 43C, in the case <strong>of</strong> an eligible assessee engaged<br />

in an eligible business, a sum equal to eight per cent <strong>of</strong> the total<br />

turnover or gross receipts <strong>of</strong> the assessee in the previous year<br />

on account <strong>of</strong> such business or, as the case may be, a sum<br />

higher than the aforesaid sum claimed to have been earned by<br />

the eligible assessee, shall be deemed to be the pr<strong>of</strong>its and<br />

gains <strong>of</strong> such business chargeable to tax under the head ―Pr<strong>of</strong>its<br />

and gains <strong>of</strong> business or pr<strong>of</strong>ession‖.<br />

(2) Any deduction allowable under the provisions <strong>of</strong> sections 30<br />

to 38 shall, for the purposes <strong>of</strong> sub-section (1), be deemed to<br />

have been already given full effect to and no further deduction<br />

under those sections shall be allowed :<br />

Provided that where the eligible assessee is a firm, the salary<br />

and interest paid to its partners shall be deducted from the<br />

income computed under sub-section (1) subject to the<br />

conditions and limits specified in clause (b) <strong>of</strong> section 40.<br />

41


8/23/2011<br />

(3) The written down value <strong>of</strong> any asset <strong>of</strong> an eligible business<br />

shall be deemed to have been calculated as if the eligible<br />

assessee had claimed and had been actually allowed the<br />

deduction in respect <strong>of</strong> the depreciation for each <strong>of</strong> the relevant<br />

assessment years.<br />

(4) The provisions <strong>of</strong> Chapter XVII-C shall not apply to an<br />

eligible assessee in so far as they relate to the eligible business.<br />

(5) Notwithstanding anything contained in the foregoing<br />

provisions <strong>of</strong> this section, an eligible assessee who claims that<br />

his pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains from the eligible business are lower than<br />

the pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains specified in sub-section (1) and whose<br />

total income exceeds the maximum amount which is not<br />

chargeable to income-tax, shall be required to keep and<br />

maintain such books <strong>of</strong> account and other documents as<br />

required under sub-section (2) <strong>of</strong> section 44AA and get them<br />

audited and furnish a report <strong>of</strong> such audit as required under<br />

section 44AB.<br />

42


8/23/2011<br />

Explanation.—For the purposes <strong>of</strong> this section,—<br />

(a)<br />

―eligible assessee‖ means,—<br />

(i) an individual, Hindu undivided family or a partnership firm, who is a<br />

resident, but not a limited liability partnership firm as defined under clause (n)<br />

<strong>of</strong> sub-section (1) <strong>of</strong> section 2 <strong>of</strong> the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 (6<br />

<strong>of</strong> 2009) and<br />

(ii) who has not claimed deduction under any <strong>of</strong> the sections 10A, 10AA,<br />

10B, 10BA or deduction under any provisions <strong>of</strong> Chapter VIA under the<br />

heading ―C. - Deductions in respect <strong>of</strong> certain incomes‖ in the relevant<br />

assessment year;<br />

(b) ―eligible business‖ means,—<br />

(i) any business except the business <strong>of</strong> plying, hiring or leasing goods<br />

carriages referred to in section 44AE; and<br />

(ii) whose total turnover or gross receipts in the previous year does not<br />

exceed an amount <strong>of</strong> [sixty lakh rupees].]<br />

Critical analysis <strong>of</strong> section 44AD<br />

43


8/23/2011<br />

Till the 31 st March,2010, the Chapter Pr<strong>of</strong>it & gains <strong>of</strong><br />

Small business on Presumptive Basis was having majorly 3<br />

sections for Indian entities.<br />

> Section 44AD civil construction<br />

> Section 44AE Transporters<br />

> Section 44AF Retail Traders<br />

From 01.04.2010 the honorable finance minister Mr.<br />

Pranab Mukherjee has amended the first section i.e.<br />

44AD along with 5 sub sections to facilitate the business<br />

operations <strong>of</strong> small taxpayers<br />

Earlier this section was extended to civil constructions<br />

only but now this section has been extended to all small<br />

businesses.<br />

44


8/23/2011<br />

The new section 44AD is as follows: 44AD<br />

(1)<br />

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained<br />

in sections 28 to 43C, in the case <strong>of</strong> an eligible<br />

assessee engaged in an eligible business, a sum equal<br />

to eight per cent <strong>of</strong> the total turnover or gross<br />

receipts <strong>of</strong> the assessee in the previous year on<br />

account <strong>of</strong> such business or, as the case may be, a<br />

sum higher than the aforesaid sum claimed to have<br />

been earned by the eligible assessee, shall be deemed<br />

to be the pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains <strong>of</strong> such<br />

business chargeable to tax under the head “Pr<strong>of</strong>its<br />

and gains <strong>of</strong> business or pr<strong>of</strong>ession”.<br />

For better understanding <strong>of</strong> sub section 1 <strong>of</strong> newly<br />

inserted section 44AD, we must know the meaning <strong>of</strong><br />

following:<br />

> Eligible Assessee<br />

> Eligible Business<br />

> Total Turnover/Gross receipts<br />

> Significance <strong>of</strong> Word Gross Receipts<br />

> Claimed to have been earned<br />

45


8/23/2011<br />

1. Who is an Eligible Assessee?<br />

(explanation to Section 44AD)<br />

(a) ―eligible assessee‖ means:-<br />

(1) an individual<br />

(2) Hindu undivided family<br />

(3) or a partnership firm<br />

who is a resident.<br />

but not a limited liability partnership firm as<br />

defined under clause (n) <strong>of</strong> sub-section (1) <strong>of</strong> section 2<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 (6 <strong>of</strong> 2009);<br />

and<br />

(explanation to Section 44AD)<br />

(ii) who has not claimed deduction under any <strong>of</strong> the sections<br />

10A, 10AA, 10B, 10BA or deduction under any provisions <strong>of</strong><br />

Chapter VIA under the heading ―C. - Deductions in respect<br />

<strong>of</strong> certain incomes‖ in the relevant assessment year;<br />

46


8/23/2011<br />

Who all are the aseessees not covered under Section 44AD?<br />

> Individual who is not resident<br />

> HUF who is not Resident<br />

> Association <strong>of</strong> Person<br />

> Firm having non resident Status.<br />

> A local Authority<br />

> A co-operative Society<br />

> Limited Liability Partnership both Indian as well as Foreign<br />

> Companies both Domestic and Foreign company<br />

> Every Artificial Juridical Person<br />

> Individual/HUF/Firms claiming deduction under chapter III <strong>of</strong> the Act<br />

i.e Section 10A,10AA,10B,10BA relating to units located in FREE<br />

Trade Zone, Hardware & S<strong>of</strong>tware Technology Park etc.<br />

> Individual/HUF/Firms claiming deduction under Chapter VIA Part-C<br />

(deductions in respect <strong>of</strong> certain Incomes) i.e Section 80H to 80TT.<br />

2. What is eligible Business ?<br />

(explanation to Section 44AD)<br />

(b)eligible business means,<br />

(i) any business except the business <strong>of</strong> plying, hiring or leasing<br />

goods carriages referred to in section 44AE; and<br />

(ii) whose total turnover or gross receipts in the previous<br />

year does not exceed an amount <strong>of</strong>[sixty lakh rupees].<br />

Meaning <strong>of</strong> the above section:<br />

Eligible Business covers any business except Transport<br />

Business (Transportation Business has special treatment under<br />

section 44AE).<br />

47


8/23/2011<br />

This provision is straightforward and includes all the<br />

business whether it is:<br />

.<br />

> Manufacturing<br />

> Trading<br />

> Wholesale<br />

> Retail<br />

> Job Work<br />

> Service business<br />

> Speculative/ Non speculative.<br />

The only criteria is that, the turnover <strong>of</strong> eligible<br />

Business should not exceed Rs. Sixty lakhs in the<br />

previous Year.<br />

What is not included in the Business?<br />

.<br />

The pr<strong>of</strong>ession is not included in the business because:<br />

There is specific reference to the word Business in<br />

Section 44AD, which does not include pr<strong>of</strong>ession, and<br />

There is specific Turnover limit <strong>of</strong> Rs. 15 Lakhs for<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>ession under section 44AB, which means that<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ession is totally separate from Business.<br />

48


8/23/2011<br />

<br />

How to calculate limit <strong>of</strong> 60 lakhs?<br />

The Total Turnover and Gross receipts should be less than 60 lacs in<br />

the previous Year.<br />

It includes all the eligible businesses carried on by a eligible assessee<br />

during the previous year and the 60 lakhs will be for all <strong>of</strong> them<br />

cumulatively.<br />

Few Examples:<br />

1. Manish, a resident individual, is carrying on three eligible<br />

businesses, the turnover <strong>of</strong> which is as under :<br />

> Business A (Manufacturing) Rs. 25 Lac<br />

> Business B (Trading) Rs. 15 Lac<br />

> Business C (Service) Rs. 25 Lac<br />

Whether section 44AD is applicable on him?<br />

The Answer is NO because turnover <strong>of</strong> eligible business<br />

exceed Rs. 60 Lakhs.<br />

49


8/23/2011<br />

<br />

2. Manish, a resident individual, is carrying on two businesses, the<br />

turnover <strong>of</strong> which is as under :<br />

> Business A (Eligible Business) Rs. 55 Lacs<br />

> Pr<strong>of</strong>ession Rs. 10 Lacs<br />

> Business B (Transport u/s 44AE) Rs. 6 Lacs<br />

Section 44AD and 44AE both are applicable, as pr<strong>of</strong>ession is not<br />

included under section 44AD and section 44AD and 44AE are<br />

independent <strong>of</strong> each other.<br />

Who bears the onus <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong> to prove the turnover?<br />

The onus <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong> is on the assessee. It is his duty to prove the<br />

turnover. If the assessee is maintaining the books <strong>of</strong> accounts, then it<br />

will be easy for him to prove the same, but if he is not maintaining<br />

the books <strong>of</strong> accounts, then it will be very difficult for him to prove,<br />

because there is no specific provision for the same.<br />

What documents you should provide to the AO to prove<br />

the turnover?<br />

- copies <strong>of</strong> invoices issued during the PY<br />

- copies <strong>of</strong> cash memo<br />

- copies <strong>of</strong> Purchase bill<br />

- Bank statement<br />

- Inventory details, if any maintained<br />

- Average G.P rate applicable to Particular business<br />

- Returns filed under sales tax/vat/excise/service Tax laws.<br />

50


8/23/2011<br />

What is the meaning <strong>of</strong> Notwithstanding<br />

Anything to contrary contained in section 28 to<br />

43C<br />

Section 44AD(1) starts with wording Notwithstanding Anything to contrary contained in<br />

section 28 to 43C it means section 28 to 43C <strong>of</strong> Income Tax Act, 1961 is not applicable on<br />

eligible assessee carrying on small business.<br />

The some <strong>of</strong> the benefits & losses <strong>of</strong> this wording is enumerated as under by way <strong>of</strong> examples<br />

:<br />

Manish has paid Rs. 28000/- for purchase <strong>of</strong> goods in cash. No disallowance can be made<br />

under section 40A(3) for the same.<br />

Ashish has paid Rs. 42000/- to transporter for freight in cash. No disallowance can be made<br />

under Section 40A (3).<br />

Vipin has contributed certain sum to national Laboratory which qualifies for deduction under<br />

section 35(2AA), if he chooses section 44AD , he will not eligible for benefit <strong>of</strong> this section.<br />

Vicky has recovered certain bad debts written <strong>of</strong>f in earlier years <strong>of</strong> Rs. 35000/-. It may not be<br />

added in specified amount declared<br />

What is the meaning <strong>of</strong> Claimed to have<br />

been earned?<br />

By the introduction <strong>of</strong> these words in section 44AD(1), the<br />

legislature shows its intention to accept specified income as<br />

returned income even if higher sum is earned by eligible<br />

assessee unless it is claimed by assessee in his Income Tax<br />

Return.<br />

Example<br />

Manish is carrying on small business . The Turnover is Rs. 50<br />

lakhs. The pr<strong>of</strong>it as per his books or calculation is Rs. 8 Lakhs.<br />

However, he opts to return the income under section 44AD<br />

@ 8% i.e Rs. 4 Lakhs. The proceeds <strong>of</strong> business are deposited<br />

in a bank account.<br />

51


8/23/2011<br />

Can the AO assess the difference<br />

amount as undisclosed income?<br />

Section 44AD(2)<br />

(2) Any deduction allowable under the provisions <strong>of</strong> sections<br />

30 to 38<br />

shall, for the purposes <strong>of</strong> sub-section (1), be deemed to have been<br />

already given full effect to and no further deduction under those<br />

sections shall be allowed<br />

.<br />

Provided that where the eligible assessee is a firm, the salary<br />

and interest paid to its partners shall be deducted from the<br />

income computed under sub-section (1) subject to the<br />

conditions and limits specified in clause (b) <strong>of</strong> section 40<br />

52


8/23/2011<br />

Computation <strong>of</strong> Taxable Pr<strong>of</strong>it u/s 44AD in case <strong>of</strong><br />

Partnership Firm<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>it from Business<br />

Particulars<br />

Amount<br />

44 AD ( Say the turnover is Rs. 50 lacs) then the 4,00,000<br />

income would be 8%<br />

Less:<br />

Interest allowable u/s 40(b) 1,20,000<br />

Remuneration to partners allowable 1,80,000<br />

Total Income <strong>of</strong> the Firm U/s. 44AD 1,00,000<br />

Section 44AD (3)<br />

The written down value <strong>of</strong> any asset <strong>of</strong> an eligible<br />

business shall be deemed to have been calculated as<br />

if the eligible assessee had claimed and had been<br />

actually allowed the deduction in respect <strong>of</strong> the<br />

depreciation for each <strong>of</strong> the relevant assessment<br />

years.<br />

53


8/23/2011<br />

Few Examples<br />

Manish a resident individual having a machinery<br />

<strong>of</strong> Rs. 2,00,000/- as on 31-03-2011 eligible for depreciation<br />

under section 32 @ 15%.In A.Y 2011-12, he opts for Section<br />

44AD. In the Assessment Year 2012-13, his turnover is Rs. 70<br />

lakh, so he calculated his pr<strong>of</strong>it as per normal provisions <strong>of</strong><br />

the Act. In A.Y 2013-14, he again opts for Section 44AD, In<br />

this Assessment year he sold the Assets for Rs. 1,50,000/-.<br />

Calculation <strong>of</strong> WDV:<br />

Particulars<br />

Amount<br />

WDV as on 31-03-2011 2,00,000<br />

Less: Depreciation @<br />

30,000<br />

15%<br />

WDV as on 31-03-2012 1,70,000<br />

Less: Depreciation @<br />

25,500<br />

15%<br />

WDV as on 31-03-2013 1,44,500<br />

Less : Sale Price 150,000<br />

WDV as on 31-03-2014<br />

Nil<br />

54


8/23/2011<br />

Calculation <strong>of</strong> Capital Gains<br />

Particulars<br />

Amount<br />

Sale Consideration 1,50,000<br />

Less WDV as on 31-03-2013 1,44,500<br />

Short Term capital gain U/s 50 5,500<br />

Whether the Assessee can carry forward unabsorbed<br />

depreciation?<br />

As per the subsection (3) <strong>of</strong> section 44AD, the Act clearly<br />

states that the depreciation is deemed to have been<br />

allowed u/s. 32 and the same has been deemed to have<br />

been set <strong>of</strong>f against the pr<strong>of</strong>it. Hence the same cannot be<br />

allowed to be allowed to be carried forward.<br />

55


8/23/2011<br />

Section 44AD(4)<br />

The provisions <strong>of</strong> Chapter XVII-C shall not apply to an eligible<br />

assessee in so far as they relate to the eligible business.<br />

<br />

Chapter XVII-C deals with provisions relating to Advance Payment <strong>of</strong> Tax.<br />

On plain reading <strong>of</strong> this subsection, we conclude that eligible assessees are exempt<br />

from payment <strong>of</strong> Advance Tax. But the second part <strong>of</strong> Provision creates a blunder so<br />

far it relates to eligible business, which creates lot <strong>of</strong> doubt.<br />

The following example will better clear your understanding :<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>it under section 44ADRs. = 4.00 lacs<br />

(Say Turnover is Rs. 50 lakhs)<br />

Interest Income = Rs.5.00 Lacs<br />

Total Income = Rs.9.00 lacs<br />

In this situation, whether the assessee is exempted from provisions <strong>of</strong> advance tax<br />

in all or whether the assessee is liable to Pay advance Tax on interest income <strong>of</strong><br />

Rs.5.00 lac.<br />

From the understanding <strong>of</strong> Law, it is clear that the assessee have to pay advance tax<br />

on interest income <strong>of</strong> Rs.5.00 lac. But how this tax calculation is to be made is no<br />

where defined in legislature?<br />

SECTION 44AD(5)<br />

This sub-section has created lots <strong>of</strong> doubts and debates in the<br />

mind <strong>of</strong> all the CAs and Tax consultants. This Sub-section is<br />

very much important for all the very small businessmen. Please<br />

give attention and read it care fully.<br />

.<br />

Notwithstanding anything contained in the foregoing<br />

provisions <strong>of</strong> this section, an eligible assessee who claims<br />

that his pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains from the eligible business are<br />

lower than the pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains specified in sub-section<br />

(1) and whose total income exceeds the maximum<br />

amount which is not chargeable to income-tax, shall be<br />

required to keep and maintain such books <strong>of</strong> account and<br />

other documents as required under sub-section (2)<br />

<strong>of</strong> section 44AA and get them audited and furnish a<br />

report <strong>of</strong> such audit as required under<br />

56


8/23/2011<br />

section 44AB<br />

The assessee is bound to get the books <strong>of</strong> accounts<br />

audited, if the following two conditions are satisfied:-<br />

1. His pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains from the eligible business<br />

are lower than the pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains specified in<br />

sub-section (1) i.e. his net pr<strong>of</strong>it is lower than 8%<br />

<strong>of</strong> turnover.<br />

and<br />

2. Whose total income exceeds the maximum<br />

amount which is not chargeable to income-tax.<br />

<br />

Here see both the conditions are simultaneous and the assessee<br />

required to get his accounts audit only and only if his pr<strong>of</strong>its from<br />

the business u/s 44AD are lower than 8% <strong>of</strong> this turnover and<br />

further his total income is more than maximum amount which is<br />

not liable to tax.<br />

The minimum amount which is not liable to tax for Assessment Year<br />

: 2011 -12 is Rs. 1.60 Lakh and the turnover <strong>of</strong> the eligible business<br />

is Rs. 38 Lakhs and the Net pr<strong>of</strong>it is Rs. 1.52 lacs which comes to<br />

only 4% hence the first condition for the compulsory audit is there<br />

but since the income is only Rs.1.52 Lakhs hence the second<br />

condition <strong>of</strong> section 44AD(5) is not complete, hence the audit is not<br />

mandatory.<br />

If whatever mentioned above is the intention <strong>of</strong> law then in most <strong>of</strong><br />

the cases where the income <strong>of</strong> the assessee is below taxable limit,<br />

they are not required to get their books <strong>of</strong> accounts audited, even if<br />

the rate <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it is below 8%<br />

57


8/23/2011<br />

Exception to Tax Audit:<br />

<br />

<br />

Once a person gets covered under any one <strong>of</strong> the four categories, Tax audit<br />

becomes mandatory. But there are two exceptions to tax audit. The first<br />

proviso to Section 44AB, exempts business covered under Section 44B and<br />

44BBA from the purview <strong>of</strong> tax audit. But the second proviso is something<br />

more interesting. The second proviso says that if the accounts <strong>of</strong> a person<br />

are to be audited under any other law, it would be sufficient if the accounts<br />

are audited under that law before the 30 th <strong>of</strong> September. The accounts need<br />

not once again be audited by an Accountant but the report in form 3CA<br />

and 3CD needs to be obtained from an Accountant.<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> this section arouse much fascination. Since Companies are<br />

required to be audited under the Companies Act, 1956, they need not be<br />

audited once again under Section 44AB. It is sufficient if the audit reports in<br />

the prescribed forms are obtained. This is even more fascinating in the Case<br />

<strong>of</strong> Co-operative Societies. Co-ops are required to be audited under the<br />

Co-operative Societies Act, but the auditor <strong>of</strong> a co-op need not be a CA.<br />

Even then a co-op need not be once again audited under Section 44AB.<br />

Case Studies u/s. 44AD:-<br />

NATURE OF<br />

BUSINESS<br />

CIVIL<br />

CONSTRUCTION<br />

CIVIL<br />

CONSTRUCTION<br />

STATUS<br />

GROSS<br />

TURNOVER/<br />

RECEIPTS<br />

NET<br />

PROFIT<br />

WHETHER LIABLE TO AUDIT<br />

U/S. 44AB<br />

INDIVIDUAL RS. 50 LAKHS Rs. 410000/- No Since Net pr<strong>of</strong>it is more<br />

than 8% <strong>of</strong> Turnover.<br />

INDIVIDUAL Rs. 50 lakhs Rs. 85000/- No since his total amount does<br />

not exceed the maximum<br />

amount not chargeable to tax<br />

CIVIL<br />

CONSTRUCTION<br />

PARTNERSHIP<br />

FIRM<br />

Rs. 50 lakhs Rs. 85000/- Yes since his Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it is<br />

below deemed income<br />

prescribed u/s. 44AD<br />

BUILDING<br />

MATERIAL<br />

SUPPLIER<br />

PARTNERSHIP<br />

FIRM<br />

Rs.70 lakhs Rs. 580000/- Yes since his turnover is<br />

exceeding Rs. 60 lakhs not<br />

eligible u/s. 44AD<br />

58


8/23/2011<br />

AN INDIVIDUAL HAVING FOLLOWING 3 PROPRIETORY BUSINESS :-<br />

CIVIL<br />

CONSTRUCTION<br />

RS. 30/- LAKHS Rs.250000/-<br />

No. since Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it is<br />

more than 8% <strong>of</strong> Gross<br />

Turnover<br />

BUILDING<br />

MATERIAL<br />

SUPPLIER<br />

RS. 70/- LAKHS Rs. 600000/- Yes because Turnover is<br />

exceeding Rs. 60 lacs<br />

STONE CRUSHER Rs. 15/- Lakhs Rs. 100000/- Yes because Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it is<br />

less than 8% <strong>of</strong> Turnover<br />

Thus assessee is required to get accounts audited in respect <strong>of</strong> Building Material<br />

supplier business & Stone Crusher Business<br />

AN INDIVIDUAL HAVING FOLLOWING 3 PROPRIETORY BUSINESS :-<br />

CIVIL<br />

CONSTRUCTION<br />

RS. 30/-<br />

LAKHS<br />

Rs.250000/-<br />

No. since Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it is<br />

more than 8% <strong>of</strong> Gross<br />

Turnover<br />

BUILDING<br />

MATERIAL<br />

SUPPLIER<br />

RS. 20/-<br />

LAKHS<br />

Rs. 180000/- No. since Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it is<br />

more than 8% <strong>of</strong> Gross<br />

Turnover<br />

STONE CRUSHER Rs. 35/- Lakhs Rs. 300000/- No. since Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it is<br />

more than 8% <strong>of</strong> Gross<br />

Turnover<br />

Even though aggregate turnover <strong>of</strong> all the business exceeds Rs. 60/- lakhs, Assessee is<br />

not liable to audit u/s. 44AB in respect <strong>of</strong> any <strong>of</strong> the business.<br />

59


8/23/2011<br />

ISSUE - 1<br />

Sanjay, a resident individual, carrying on five businesses the<br />

turnover <strong>of</strong> which are as under:<br />

a) Manufacturing Rs 30/- lakhs<br />

b) Service Rs 15/- lakhs<br />

c) Wholesale trading Rs 10/- lakhs<br />

d) Retail trading Rs 5/- lakhs<br />

e) Interest from money lending Rs 5/- lakhs<br />

ISSUE - 2<br />

Deepak & Co, a resident firm having two businesses, the<br />

turnover <strong>of</strong> which is as under:<br />

a) Trading Rs 40/- lakhs<br />

b) Transportation business Rs 30/- lakhs<br />

.<br />

60


8/23/2011<br />

ISSUE - 3<br />

Sachin, a resident individual has given the following details:<br />

a) Pr<strong>of</strong>essional gross receipts Rs 30/- lakhs<br />

b) Manufacturing business turnover Rs 35/- lakhs<br />

ISSUE – 4<br />

XYZ, a resident HUF carrying on trading activities. Total<br />

turnover <strong>of</strong> the business is Rs 40/- lakhs. Pr<strong>of</strong>it as per books is<br />

Rs 6.5 lakhs. However, it wants to file the return <strong>of</strong> income<br />

under section 44AD and claim pr<strong>of</strong>it at 8% i.e. 3.2 lakhs. Can<br />

it do so?<br />

61


8/23/2011<br />

ISSUE – 5<br />

Srinidhi a resident individual covered under section 44AD, for<br />

three consecutive assessment year 2011-12 to 2013-14, WDV<br />

<strong>of</strong> furniture as on 31-03-2010 is Rs 50,000/-. He sells the<br />

furniture for Rs 42,000/- on 01-01-2013.<br />

Compute WDV <strong>of</strong> furniture for assessment year 2013-14?<br />

ISSUE – 6<br />

Mamta an individual resident, assessed under section 44AD<br />

has made the following payments (previous assessment year<br />

assessed under section 44AB):<br />

62


8/23/2011<br />

Case 1:<br />

Cash payment <strong>of</strong> Rs 32,000/- for purchases<br />

Single cash payment <strong>of</strong> Rs 51,000/- for repair expenses<br />

(contract without TDS)<br />

Payment <strong>of</strong> interest <strong>of</strong> Rs 18,000/- without TDS.<br />

Case 2:<br />

The following disallowances were made in the previous<br />

assessment year:<br />

Cash payment exceeding Rs 20,000/- for purchases<br />

Interest expenditure <strong>of</strong> Rs 25,000/- for non-remittance <strong>of</strong> TDS<br />

with in due date. TDS amount being paid in the next year.<br />

63


8/23/2011<br />

ISSUE NO - 7<br />

Sapna is a resident individual assessed under section 44AD<br />

recovered bad debts written-<strong>of</strong>f in earlier years Rs<br />

23,000/-.<br />

ISSUE NO - 8<br />

Mitesh is a resident individual submits the following details:<br />

Net pr<strong>of</strong>it from trading business<br />

(TO Rs 40/- lakhs) 1,80,000.00<br />

Other income 10,000.00<br />

80C deductions to be allowed 35,000.00<br />

Compute his total income, whether section 44AD and section<br />

44AB would be applicable?<br />

64


8/23/2011<br />

ISSUE NO - 9<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> an assessee being an individual or HUF liable to<br />

audit under section 44AB because <strong>of</strong> section 44AD, would<br />

TDS provisions apply to him in the next year?<br />

ISSUE NO – 10<br />

Would audit under section 44AB for the purpose <strong>of</strong> section<br />

44AD be counted in the limit <strong>of</strong> tax audits for tax auditors?<br />

65


8/23/2011<br />

ISSUE NO – 11<br />

Speculation:<br />

The following is the pr<strong>of</strong>it & loss account <strong>of</strong> Mr Ashish, a<br />

resident individual dealing in shares. Whether section 44AD<br />

would apply?<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>it & Loss Account<br />

To Loss on sale <strong>of</strong><br />

shares<br />

20,00,000.00 By Pr<strong>of</strong>it on sale <strong>of</strong><br />

shares<br />

65,00,000.00<br />

To Net pr<strong>of</strong>it 45,00,000.00<br />

65,00,000.00 65,00,000.00<br />

66


8/23/2011<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> a person who is doing speculation business in<br />

shares with no intention <strong>of</strong> taking or giving delivery but<br />

merely earning or losing through squaring up <strong>of</strong><br />

transactions, what will constitute the turnover / gross<br />

receipts <strong>of</strong> the business?<br />

ISSUE NO – 12.<br />

Nimita & Co, a resident firm, submits the following details for<br />

the previous year 2010-11:<br />

Total turnover : 20,00,000.00<br />

Loss from trading business (as per P & L A/c): 1,50,000.00<br />

Salary and interest to partners,<br />

debited to P & L A/c: 1,70,000.00<br />

& 1,15,000.00 respectively<br />

Is section 44AD applicable?<br />

67


8/23/2011<br />

ISSUE NO – 13.<br />

Sneha an individual resident, carrying on trading activity<br />

submits the following:<br />

Compute total income.<br />

Turnover : 40,00,000.00<br />

Net pr<strong>of</strong>it as per normal<br />

provision books : 2,00,000.00<br />

B/f depreciation allowance: 2,00,000.00<br />

B/f business loss AY 08-09: 1,50,000.00<br />

Net pr<strong>of</strong>it as per normal provisions is 5%. Assessee opts<br />

for section 44AD and <strong>of</strong>fers Rs 3,20,000.00 i.e., 8% <strong>of</strong> Rs<br />

40 lakhs as his pr<strong>of</strong>it from business.<br />

Computation <strong>of</strong> income from business?<br />

68


8/23/2011<br />

ISSUE NO. - 14<br />

Mr Prem, an individual resident, submits the following details?<br />

Compute tax liability for assessment year 2011-12?<br />

Income from business to be assessed<br />

under section 44AD 4,00,000.00<br />

Income from other sources 10,00,000.00<br />

Deduction under section 80C 1,00,000.00<br />

Advance tax paid<br />

Nil<br />

Presumptive taxation – Plying,<br />

hiring or leasing goods carriage<br />

<br />

Section 44AE: In case <strong>of</strong> the business <strong>of</strong> plying, hiring or leasing<br />

goods carriages, higher income is to be deemed: - w.e.f.<br />

01.04.2011 (FY 2010-11)<br />

Type <strong>of</strong> vehicle<br />

Heavy goods vehicles<br />

Other than heavy goods<br />

vehicles<br />

Estimated income per vehicle<br />

Rs. 5,000/- per month or part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

month. (Earlier Rs. 3,500/-)<br />

Rs. 4,500/- per month or part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

month. (Earlier Rs. 3,150/-)<br />

69


8/23/2011<br />

FORM NO. 3CD<br />

[See rule 6G(2)]<br />

Statement <strong>of</strong> particulars required to be furnished under<br />

section 44AB <strong>of</strong> the Income-tax Act, 1961<br />

Amendment<br />

Central Law Board <strong>of</strong> Direct Tax has amended tax audit<br />

form no. 3CD vide notification dated 10thAugust, 2006<br />

and 13thApril 2009<br />

70


8/23/2011<br />

PART A<br />

Clause (1 to 6)<br />

1. Name <strong>of</strong> the assessee<br />

2. Address<br />

3. Permanent Account Number<br />

4. Status<br />

5. Previous year ended<br />

6. Assessment year<br />

Issues on Clause(1 to 6)<br />

1) If assessee is proprietor give his/her name along with all<br />

Proprietary Firm‘s name.<br />

2) As per income tax record, if any change in address must be<br />

given.<br />

3) If PAN has been applied and allotment is pending mentioned<br />

not yet allotted.The copy <strong>of</strong> application <strong>of</strong> applied PAN must be<br />

kept by the Auditor.<br />

4) ‗Status‘ means as per sec. 2 (31) <strong>of</strong> Income Tax Act & not<br />

‗residential status‘ [Sec 2(31) – ―Person‖ includes an Individual,<br />

HUF, Firm etc.<br />

5) As per sec. 3 <strong>of</strong> Income Tax Act, previous year should end on<br />

31st March.<br />

6) Assessment year according to the relevant Previous Year<br />

71


8/23/2011<br />

PART B<br />

Clause 7 to 32<br />

Clause 7a. If firm or association <strong>of</strong> persons, indicate names <strong>of</strong><br />

partners/members and their pr<strong>of</strong>it sharing ratio<br />

Clause 7b. If there is any change in the partners or members or<br />

in their pr<strong>of</strong>it sharing ratio since the last date <strong>of</strong> the preceding<br />

year, the particulars <strong>of</strong> such change<br />

72


8/23/2011<br />

ISSUES ON Clause 7:<br />

Ans: (i) What is the date with reference to which the<br />

information in subclause (a) is to be given? Is it on the first<br />

day <strong>of</strong> the previous year or last day there<strong>of</strong>?<br />

Paragraph 18.1, inter alia, clarifies that the details <strong>of</strong> partners<br />

or members during the entire previous year will have to be<br />

furnished. Hence, the names <strong>of</strong> partners <strong>of</strong> the firm or<br />

members <strong>of</strong> the association <strong>of</strong> persons and their pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

sharing ratios during the entire previous year will have to be<br />

stated and not merely on the first day <strong>of</strong> the previous year or<br />

last day there<strong>of</strong>.<br />

(ii) Should the dates on which the change referred to in sub-clause<br />

(b) occurred, be mentioned?<br />

Paragraph 18.2 clarifies that if there is any change in the partners<br />

<strong>of</strong> the firm or members <strong>of</strong> the association <strong>of</strong> persons or their pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

or loss sharing ratio, the particulars <strong>of</strong> such change must be stated.<br />

The word "particulars" is significant and it includes the relevant<br />

dates also. The date on which there is a change in the membership<br />

<strong>of</strong> partner(s) <strong>of</strong> a firm or member(s) <strong>of</strong> an association <strong>of</strong> persons<br />

or a change in the pr<strong>of</strong>it sharing ratios (including changes, if any,<br />

in the terms <strong>of</strong> remuneration, interest) is extremely significant data<br />

for the purpose <strong>of</strong> calculating interest, remuneration etc.<br />

73


8/23/2011<br />

Further, once there is a change in the partners/members or their<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>it sharing ratio, it will obviously be reflected either in a fresh<br />

partnership deed or a supplementary partnership deed. Hence, it is<br />

necessary to mention the dates on which such changes occurred.<br />

Even in a case where there is a change in the salary to partners it is<br />

necessary to mention the dates on which such changes have<br />

occurred, as change in salary to partners is as significant as<br />

changes in the pr<strong>of</strong>it sharing ratios among the partners.<br />

(iii) Keeping in view the requirements <strong>of</strong> section 184, is it<br />

necessary to confirm the particulars <strong>of</strong> change with the records <strong>of</strong><br />

Registrar <strong>of</strong> Firm ?<br />

Ans: Paragraph 18.3 gives guidance about the supplementary<br />

documents which the tax auditor may verify in order to satisfy<br />

himself about the genuineness <strong>of</strong> change in the partners or change<br />

in the pr<strong>of</strong>it sharing ratios. Sub point (ii) <strong>of</strong> the above paragraph<br />

points out that the tax auditor may verify whether notice <strong>of</strong><br />

change, if required, has been given to the registrar <strong>of</strong> firms. Thus<br />

the verification <strong>of</strong> records <strong>of</strong> the registrar <strong>of</strong> firms is discretionary<br />

and has to be done in accordance with the pr<strong>of</strong>essional judgement<br />

<strong>of</strong> the tax auditor.<br />

74


8/23/2011<br />

(iv) When a partner in a representative capacity, say, karta <strong>of</strong> HUF,<br />

retires from a firm and is admitted to that firm in his individual<br />

capacity, is it a change in the constitution <strong>of</strong> the firm as envisaged<br />

by this clause ?<br />

Ans: It is a change in the constitution <strong>of</strong> the firm as envisaged by<br />

this clause.<br />

Clause 8a. Nature <strong>of</strong> business or pr<strong>of</strong>ession (if more than one<br />

business or pr<strong>of</strong>ession is carried on during the previous year, nature<br />

<strong>of</strong> every business or pr<strong>of</strong>ession)<br />

For this, reference can be made to the director‘s report and / or<br />

abstract under Part IV <strong>of</strong> Schedule VI.<br />

Clause 8b. If there is any change in the nature <strong>of</strong> business or<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ession, particulars <strong>of</strong> such change<br />

Some examples <strong>of</strong> change in nature:<br />

1. from manufacturer to trader or vice versa<br />

2. change in principal line <strong>of</strong> business In case <strong>of</strong> amalgamation /<br />

demerger, if similar line <strong>of</strong> activity, it would not amount to change<br />

in the nature.<br />

The tax auditor should make proper enquiries, review the minutes<br />

<strong>of</strong> meeting (if made available), director‘s report, etc.<br />

75


8/23/2011<br />

Issues on Clause 8<br />

Permanent discontinuance<strong>of</strong> a particular product<br />

line <strong>of</strong> business need to be reported not temporary<br />

suspension.<br />

―Nature <strong>of</strong> business or Pr<strong>of</strong>ession‖given must be same as<br />

Annexure -I.<br />

Effect on Carry or forward <strong>of</strong> losses :-from A.Y. 2000-01<br />

losses will be carried forward, even if the business or<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ession is discontinued (Sec 72(1)(i))<br />

Clause 9<br />

(a)Whether books <strong>of</strong> account are prescribed under<br />

section 44AA, if yes, list <strong>of</strong> books so prescribed.<br />

(b) Books <strong>of</strong> account maintained. (In case books <strong>of</strong><br />

account are maintained in a computer system, mention<br />

the books <strong>of</strong> account generated by such computer<br />

system)<br />

(c) List <strong>of</strong> books <strong>of</strong> account examined.<br />

76


8/23/2011<br />

Sec 44AA<br />

Specified Pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />

Limit Rs 1,50,000 Receipts<br />

Non Specified Pr<strong>of</strong>ession or<br />

Business<br />

Limit Total income Rs 1,20,000 or<br />

Total Sale Receipts Rs 10,00,000<br />

Exceeds<br />

Does not<br />

Exceeds<br />

Exceeds<br />

Does not<br />

Exceeds<br />

Prescribes<br />

Books Rule 6F<br />

Any books<br />

Any books<br />

No books are<br />

mandatory<br />

Note: Any books means the books so as to enable the<br />

Assessing Officer to compute his total income in<br />

accordance with the provisions <strong>of</strong> this Act.<br />

77


8/23/2011<br />

Cont.<br />

<br />

Prescribed Books:<br />

Cash book<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Journal (if the accounts are kept on mercantile bases)<br />

Ledger<br />

Serial numbered carbon copies <strong>of</strong> the bills and receipts issued<br />

Original purchase bill/payment vouchers.<br />

If person carrying on medical pr<strong>of</strong>ession in addition to above books a daily case<br />

register in form no. 3C. and stock register<br />

[RULE 6F (2) &(3) ]<br />

<br />

Prescribed books <strong>of</strong> account are to be kept at the place <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>ession or principal<br />

place <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>ession if carried at more than one place[s.rule(4)] and for a period <strong>of</strong> 6<br />

years from the end <strong>of</strong> the relevant assessment year. [ rule 6F(5)]<br />

Specified Pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />

Legal, medical, engineering, accountancy, architectural<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ession, technical consultancy, interior decoration or<br />

other notified pr<strong>of</strong>ession.<br />

vide notification : No. SO 17(E), dated 12-1-1977.,<br />

notified pr<strong>of</strong>essions are the pr<strong>of</strong>ession <strong>of</strong> authorised<br />

representative and the pr<strong>of</strong>ession <strong>of</strong> a film artist.<br />

78


8/23/2011<br />

Sec 2(12A) Books or Books <strong>of</strong> account includes:-<br />

Ledgers<br />

Day-Books<br />

Cash books<br />

Account books<br />

Others<br />

Whether kept in the written form or as print-outs <strong>of</strong> data<br />

stored in a floppy, disc, tape or any other form <strong>of</strong> electromagnetic<br />

data storage device.<br />

If case <strong>of</strong> books <strong>of</strong> accounts generated by the Computer<br />

system; the proper print out are mandatory.<br />

ISSUES ON Clause 9:<br />

Books <strong>of</strong> Account:<br />

In case where stock records are not properly maintained<br />

by the assessee due to big volume <strong>of</strong> operations e.g.<br />

particularly in case <strong>of</strong> retail trade how should the tax<br />

auditor report on such imperfect records maintained by<br />

the assesse.<br />

79


8/23/2011<br />

Ans : Paragraph 20.6 advises the assessees engaged in trading/<br />

manufacturing activities to maintain quantitative details<br />

principal items <strong>of</strong> stores, raw material and finished goods.<br />

Inventories normally constitute a significant portion <strong>of</strong> the total<br />

assets particularly in the case <strong>of</strong> manufacturing and trading<br />

entities as well as some service rendering entities. The Auditing<br />

Practices Committee has issued a Guidance Note on Audit <strong>of</strong><br />

(b) Inventories.<br />

Under the paragraph entitled "examination <strong>of</strong> records" it has<br />

been observed in the above Guidance Note that the auditor may<br />

come across cases where the entity does not maintain detailed<br />

stock records" other than basic records relating to purchase and<br />

sales. In such situations, the auditor would have to suitably<br />

extend the extent <strong>of</strong> application <strong>of</strong> the audit procedures in<br />

regard to the inventories.<br />

80


8/23/2011<br />

While giving the particulars in Form NO.3CD the concept <strong>of</strong><br />

materiality has to be kept in mind. If the value <strong>of</strong> inventories<br />

constitutes a very significant portion <strong>of</strong> the total assets and even<br />

then the assessee does not maintain proper stock records, the<br />

auditor will have to exercise his pr<strong>of</strong>essional judgement<br />

whether the absence <strong>of</strong> such records would affect his reporting<br />

requirements.<br />

Clause 10. Whether the pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account includes any<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains assessable on presumptive basis, if yes,<br />

indicate the amount and the relevant sections (Sec 44AD,<br />

44AE, 44AF, 44B, 44BB, 44BBA, 44BBB or any other<br />

relevant section)<br />

81


8/23/2011<br />

SL. NO. Section<br />

Business Covered<br />

1 44AD<br />

Civil construction business<br />

2 44AE Transport business<br />

3 44B<br />

Shipping business <strong>of</strong> a non-resident<br />

Providing service or facilities in connection with, or<br />

supplying plant and machinery on hire used, or to be<br />

used, in the prospecting for, or extraction or<br />

4 44BB<br />

production <strong>of</strong>, mineral oils.<br />

5 44BBA Operation <strong>of</strong> aircraft by non-resident.<br />

This refers to the sections not listed above under<br />

which income may be assessable on presumption<br />

basis like section 44D and sec 115A(1)(b) and will<br />

include any other section that may be enacted in<br />

6 Any other relevant section future for presumptive taxation.<br />

Clause 11a. Method <strong>of</strong> accounting employed in the previous year<br />

‣ Assessee can follow either cash or mercantile system <strong>of</strong><br />

accounting, hybrid system is not permitted.<br />

‣ However, assessee can adopt cash system for one business and<br />

mercantile for other business. But the assessee has to consistently<br />

follow the method <strong>of</strong> accounting.<br />

‣ As per Section 209 <strong>of</strong> the Companies Act 1956, every Company is<br />

required to keep books <strong>of</strong> account under accrual basis. The tax auditor<br />

should refer the notes to the accounts.<br />

‣<br />

82


8/23/2011<br />

Clause 11b. Whether there has been any change in the method<br />

<strong>of</strong> accounting employed vis-à-vis the method employed in the<br />

immediately preceding previous year<br />

‣ The change in the accounting policy may not be a change in<br />

accounting method. Hence, it need not be reported here.<br />

‣ The method <strong>of</strong> accounting can be changed provided changed<br />

method is regular method and the assessee has not merely<br />

abandoned or changed it for a casual period to suit his own<br />

purposes.<br />

Clause 11c. If answer to (b) above is in the affirmative, give details<br />

<strong>of</strong> such change, and the effect there<strong>of</strong> on the pr<strong>of</strong>it or loss<br />

The concept <strong>of</strong> materiality is the basic governing factor. If it is not<br />

possible to quantify effect, disclosure <strong>of</strong> such fact should be stated.<br />

Reference can be made to the notes to the accounts.<br />

Clause 11d. Details <strong>of</strong> deviation, if any, in the method <strong>of</strong> accounting<br />

employed in the previous year from accounting standards prescribed<br />

under section 145 and the effect there on the pr<strong>of</strong>it or loss<br />

U/s 145(2)- Accounting Standard to be followed by all assessee<br />

following mercantile system <strong>of</strong> accounting .<br />

The Central Government has notified two Accounting Standards [CBDT<br />

C.No. 9949 dated July25,1996]<br />

(A) Accounting Standard – I<br />

Relating to ― Disclosure <strong>of</strong> Accounting Policies‖.<br />

B) Accounting Standard – II<br />

Relating to Disclosure <strong>of</strong> ―Prior Period and Extraordinary Items<br />

and changes in Accounting Policies‖.<br />

83


8/23/2011<br />

Reporting <strong>of</strong> treatment <strong>of</strong> Excise Duty, VAT etc<br />

Clause 12<br />

12(a) Method <strong>of</strong> valuation <strong>of</strong> closing stock employed in the<br />

previous year<br />

(b) Details <strong>of</strong> deviation, if any, from the method <strong>of</strong> valuation<br />

prescribed under section 145A, and the effect there<strong>of</strong> on the pr<strong>of</strong>it or<br />

loss.<br />

<br />

<br />

Clause 21: Residuary note<br />

State whether sales tax, customs duty, excise duty or any other<br />

indirect tax, levy, cess, impost etc. is passed through the pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss<br />

account.<br />

Clause 22(a):<br />

22. (a) Amount <strong>of</strong> Modified Value Added Tax credits availed <strong>of</strong><br />

or utilised during the previous year and its treatment in the pr<strong>of</strong>it and<br />

loss account and treatment <strong>of</strong> outstanding Modified Value Added Tax<br />

credits in the accounts.<br />

Clause 12a. Method <strong>of</strong> valuation <strong>of</strong> closing stock employed<br />

in the previous year<br />

The tax auditor should refer the method <strong>of</strong> valuation in<br />

significant accounting policies in the notes to the accounts.<br />

The word the ―Closing Stock‖ includes all items <strong>of</strong> inventory.<br />

84


8/23/2011<br />

Clause 12b. Details <strong>of</strong> deviation, if any, from the method <strong>of</strong> valuation<br />

prescribed under section 145A, and the effect there<strong>of</strong> on the pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

or loss<br />

Section 145A has come into force from A.Y 1999-2000. It is not<br />

necessary to change the method <strong>of</strong> valuation <strong>of</strong> purchase / sale and<br />

inventory regularly employed in books <strong>of</strong> account.<br />

The adjustments provided under the section can be made while<br />

computing the income for the return. The adjustments will affect<br />

opening stock, purchases, sales and closing stock. The adjustments<br />

are as follows:<br />

any tax, duty, cess or fee actually paid or incurred on inputs, sales,<br />

inventory should be added, if not already added (to gross up)<br />

Issues on Clause 12(a) :<br />

Valuation <strong>of</strong> Closing Stock:<br />

Where an assessee is following cash system <strong>of</strong><br />

accounting, should he account for the closing stock or<br />

alternatively, can the entire purchases be claimed as<br />

an expense?<br />

85


8/23/2011<br />

Ans: Even if the assessee is following cash system <strong>of</strong><br />

accounting, he should account for the closing stock as per the<br />

principles laid down in Accounting standard – 2 (Revised)<br />

valuation <strong>of</strong> inventories. The trading account has to be<br />

prepared and the opening stock, purchases and closing stock<br />

have to be kept in mind while making valuation <strong>of</strong> closing<br />

stock.<br />

In this connection, a reference may be made to the decision<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Supreme Court in CIT v. A. Krishnaswami Mudaliar<br />

(53 ITR 122, 132), wherein it was held ―But whatever may<br />

be the system, whether it is cash or mercantile,…, in a<br />

trading venture it would be impossible accurately to assess<br />

the true pr<strong>of</strong>its without taking into account the value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

stock in trade at the beginning and at the end <strong>of</strong> the year‘.<br />

In clause 3(i) <strong>of</strong> the old Form No. 3CD, reference<br />

was to ―opening and closing stock-in-trade‖. In sub<br />

clause (a) <strong>of</strong> clause 12 <strong>of</strong> revised Form No. 3CD, the<br />

reference is to closing stock . What is the significance<br />

<strong>of</strong> this change?<br />

86


8/23/2011<br />

Ans: The significance <strong>of</strong> this change is explained in paragraph 23.3.<br />

<strong>of</strong> guidance note on tax audit revised 2005 edition. In clause 3(i)<br />

<strong>of</strong> the old Form No. 3CD reference was to ―opening and closing<br />

stock-in-trade‘. In sub-clause (a) <strong>of</strong> clause 12 <strong>of</strong> revised Form No.<br />

3CD, the reference is to ―closing stock‖. The expression ―stock-intrade‖<br />

means finished goods and raw materials. Since subclause(b)<br />

refers to section 145A where the term ― inventories‖ is<br />

used, the term ―closing stock‖ will include all items <strong>of</strong> inventories.<br />

AS-2 defines the term ―inventories‖ to include finished goods, raw<br />

material maintenance supplies, consumables and loose tools.<br />

Therefore, method <strong>of</strong> valuation <strong>of</strong> items <strong>of</strong> closing inventories will<br />

have to be given under sub-clause (a).<br />

Issues on Clause – 12(b)<br />

Please clarify whether adjustment <strong>of</strong> Cenvat against<br />

excise duty payable is considered as ―paid‖ for the<br />

purposes <strong>of</strong> section 43B?<br />

87


8/23/2011<br />

Ans : Yes, adjustment <strong>of</strong> Cenvat against excise duty<br />

payable is considered as ―actually paid‖ for the<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> allowance under section 43B. It is a<br />

constructive payment. Reference can also be made to<br />

the Hon‘ble Supreme Court decision in standard<br />

Triumph Motor Company Limited v CIT 201 ITR 391.<br />

Section 145A is supposed to be tax neutral This<br />

argument does not hold good in a case where excise<br />

duty is payable by a manufacturer in a financial year<br />

on account <strong>of</strong> his sales exceeding the basic exemption<br />

limit, but in the next year the turnover is within the<br />

basic exemption limit and the unit is not liable to pay<br />

the excise duty. In such a situation, how can the credit<br />

<strong>of</strong> excise duty on closing stock be claimed?<br />

88


8/23/2011<br />

Ans: In the first year debit <strong>of</strong> excise duty adjustment <strong>of</strong> excise<br />

duty to the closing stock would <strong>of</strong>fset each other and as such<br />

there would be no impact on the pr<strong>of</strong>it as per accounts.<br />

However, the debit on account <strong>of</strong> excise duty would be<br />

disallowed under section 43B. In the next year the opening<br />

stock would be closing stock <strong>of</strong> the first year, duly adjusted<br />

with excise duty. The earlier year‘s excise duty debit would be<br />

credited to pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account <strong>of</strong> the next year. However,<br />

this credit would not be taxable in view <strong>of</strong> disallowance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

amount in the first year under section 43B.<br />

It is also significant to note that paragraph 13 <strong>of</strong> AS 4 –<br />

Contingencies and events occurring after the balance sheet date<br />

provides that assets and liabilities should be adjusted for events<br />

occurring after the balance sheet date that provide additional<br />

evidence to assist the estimation <strong>of</strong> amounts relating to<br />

conditions existing at the balance sheet date.<br />

89


8/23/2011<br />

Liability on closing stock <strong>of</strong> finished goods are<br />

provided The goods are yet in the godown. There is a<br />

fire and goods are destroyed. Is the assessee required<br />

to include the amount <strong>of</strong> excise duty in the valuation<br />

<strong>of</strong> stock for the purpose <strong>of</strong> section 145A?<br />

Ans: Excise is a duty on manufacture <strong>of</strong> goods and the<br />

liability for duty arise as soon as such goods are<br />

manufactured. The duty payable on such goods will<br />

have to be included for the purpose <strong>of</strong> valuation <strong>of</strong><br />

closing stock. If such goods are lost or destroyed in<br />

storage, remission <strong>of</strong> duty can be given by the<br />

commissioner on application. However, once the goods<br />

are cleared from the factory and subsequently they are<br />

destroyed there is no provision for granting refund <strong>of</strong><br />

duty.<br />

90


8/23/2011<br />

During the year after announcement <strong>of</strong> AS-2 as<br />

mandatory, Cenvat has been excluded for the<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> valuation <strong>of</strong> opening stock though<br />

Cenvat portion was considered for valuation <strong>of</strong><br />

closing stock <strong>of</strong> last year. Since clause 12(b) asks<br />

for details <strong>of</strong> deviation, if any, from section 145A,<br />

should the deviation for valuation <strong>of</strong> opening stock<br />

be given? Alternatively please clarify whether this<br />

issue is covered in clause 11(d).<br />

Ans: Yes, the excise duty should be included in the<br />

valuation <strong>of</strong> stock in order to comply with provisions <strong>of</strong><br />

section 145A. Once the statutory adjustments are shown<br />

as part <strong>of</strong> computation <strong>of</strong> income, no separate<br />

disclosure is necessary under sub-clause 12(a). The<br />

issue is not covered by clause 11(d) since 11(d) requires<br />

reporting <strong>of</strong> deviation, if any, in the method <strong>of</strong><br />

accounting employed in the previous year from<br />

accounting standard prescribed under section 145.<br />

91


8/23/2011<br />

While giving effect <strong>of</strong> deviation from section 145A, as per<br />

the Guidance Note excise duty payable on finished goods<br />

has to be covered in the information related to section 43B<br />

i.e. it is allowable as deduction on payment basis. Kindly<br />

elaborate<br />

Ans: The component <strong>of</strong> excise duty on finished goods forms<br />

part <strong>of</strong> value <strong>of</strong> stock in trade. This is because the moment<br />

the manufacture <strong>of</strong> the goods is complete in all respects and<br />

ready for dispatch the liability <strong>of</strong> excise duty arises. The<br />

deduction for excise duty is allowed only when the excise<br />

duty on such goods is paid on the finished stocks cleared<br />

and/or dispatched. The information relating to section 43B is<br />

only to see that claim is not made on the basis <strong>of</strong> advance<br />

payments made without clearance and/ or dispatch <strong>of</strong> goods.<br />

92


8/23/2011<br />

Subsequent to the year end but before furnishing <strong>of</strong> return, excise<br />

duty <strong>of</strong> an amount which is more than the payable amount, has<br />

been paid. However all the items which formed part <strong>of</strong> the closing<br />

stock has not been cleared.<br />

Ans: Section 43B is a provision intended to disallow certain<br />

items <strong>of</strong> expenditure which are otherwise admissible on<br />

account <strong>of</strong> non-payment within the stipulated date. It cannot<br />

be used to allow an item <strong>of</strong> expenditure which is not relating<br />

to the year merely on account payment made. Hence, excise<br />

duty paid in excess <strong>of</strong> amount payable cannot be claimed as<br />

deduction. Reference to Gopikrishna Granites India Ltd., v.<br />

DCIT 251 ITR 337 (AP) and Hindustan Liver Limited v.<br />

V.K. Pandey, JCIT, 251 ITR 209 (Bom) can be relevant in<br />

this regard.<br />

93


8/23/2011<br />

Clause 12A- Conversion <strong>of</strong> Capital Asset into Stock in Trade at<br />

fair market value: Section 45(2)<br />

Give the following particulars <strong>of</strong> the capital asset converted into<br />

stock-in-trade: -<br />

(a) Description <strong>of</strong> capital asset,<br />

(b) Date <strong>of</strong> acquisition;<br />

(c) Cost <strong>of</strong> acquisition;<br />

(d) Amount at which the asset is converted into stock-in-trade<br />

Issues on Clause – 12A<br />

This clause is inserted to keep a track record <strong>of</strong> transactions<br />

related to conversion <strong>of</strong> capital asset into stock-in-trade.<br />

Such conversion is treated as transfer u/s 2(47)<br />

U/s 45(2) notional capital gain arise from such transfer and<br />

chargeable to tax in the year in which such stock-in-trade is sold.<br />

No requirement <strong>of</strong> details <strong>of</strong> taxability <strong>of</strong> capital gain or business<br />

income from such deemed transfer.<br />

Follow AS-2 for valuation <strong>of</strong> stock-in-trade<br />

Follow AS-10 for valuation <strong>of</strong> fixed assets.<br />

Follow AS-22 for provision <strong>of</strong> I.Tax as temporary timing<br />

difference.<br />

Sec 47 & 47A also to be kept in mind.<br />

94


8/23/2011<br />

Cost <strong>of</strong> capital asset in case <strong>of</strong>:<br />

Purchase–From invoice, Books etc<br />

Self –constructed–directly related cost<br />

Acquired in exchange–FMV or Net Book value <strong>of</strong><br />

asset given up<br />

Acquired by way <strong>of</strong> inheritance–In this case if no<br />

evidence exist –Auditor should rely upon the report <strong>of</strong><br />

the experts such as valuers.<br />

Information under item no. 12A should be necessary not<br />

only in the year <strong>of</strong> conversion but also in the year <strong>of</strong> sale<br />

<strong>of</strong> relevant stock in trade. Since sec. 45(2) provides only<br />

for the computation <strong>of</strong> capital gain in the year <strong>of</strong><br />

conversion but the due date <strong>of</strong> payment <strong>of</strong> tax is in the<br />

year <strong>of</strong> sale <strong>of</strong> such converted stock-in-trade.<br />

95


8/23/2011<br />

The legislation has not visualized the situation where<br />

stock in trade is to be converted into capital asset. In<br />

the absence <strong>of</strong> a specific provision, the formula which<br />

is favorable to assessee should be accepted. (ITA<br />

6374/MUM/2004, ACIT v Bright Star Inv P Ltd)<br />

Clause 13. Amounts not credited to the pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account,<br />

being:<br />

a. the items falling within the scope <strong>of</strong> section 28<br />

Section 28 prescribes certain items to be treated as income for e.g.<br />

sum received under Keyman insurance policy including the sum<br />

allocated by way <strong>of</strong> bonus on such policy, etc.<br />

Under this clause various amounts falling within the scope <strong>of</strong><br />

section 28 which are not credited to the pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account are<br />

to be stated.<br />

The information is to be given with reference to the entries in the<br />

books <strong>of</strong> accounts and records made available to the tax auditor.<br />

96


8/23/2011<br />

b. the pr<strong>of</strong>orma credits, drawbacks, refund <strong>of</strong> duty <strong>of</strong><br />

customs or excise or service tax, or refund <strong>of</strong> sales tax or<br />

value added tax, where such credits, drawbacks or<br />

refunds are admitted as due by the authorities concerned<br />

The tax auditor has to examine all relevant correspondence,<br />

records and evidence in order to determine whether any<br />

claim has been admitted as due within the relevant previous<br />

year.<br />

If cash system is followed, even if it is admitted within the<br />

previous year, but not actually received during the previous<br />

year, it need not be reported here.<br />

c. Escalations claims accepted during the previous year<br />

Escalation claims would normally arise pursuant to a contract.<br />

Only those claims, to which the other party has signified<br />

unconditional acceptance need to be reported here.<br />

d. Any other item <strong>of</strong> income<br />

Any other items which tax auditor considers as income based on<br />

verification <strong>of</strong> records, but not credited to Pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account<br />

to be reported under this clause.<br />

In giving details under sub clauses (c ) and (d), due regard should<br />

be given to AS – 9 Revenue Recognition.<br />

97


8/23/2011<br />

e. Capital receipt, if any<br />

The auditor should refer to Cash flow statement for this purpose and<br />

exercise his pr<strong>of</strong>essional expertise and judgment.<br />

Some examples are :<br />

1. Capital subsidy received in the form <strong>of</strong> government grants<br />

which are in the nature <strong>of</strong> promoters‘ contribution.<br />

2. Government grants in relation to a specific fixed asset where<br />

such grant has been shown as a deduction from gross value <strong>of</strong><br />

fixed assets.<br />

3. Compensation for surrendering certain rights.<br />

4. Pr<strong>of</strong>it on sale <strong>of</strong> fixed assets / investments to the extent not<br />

credited to the pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account.<br />

Clause 13:<br />

Amounts not credited to the Pr<strong>of</strong>it & Loss Account:<br />

Nowadays many companies are organizing foreign<br />

tours for their dealers if they achieve targeted sales. In<br />

such situations either the proprietor dealer or the<br />

partner <strong>of</strong> the dealer firm or the director <strong>of</strong> the dealer<br />

company may avail <strong>of</strong> the foreign tour, What are the<br />

duties <strong>of</strong> the tax auditor in this regard.<br />

98


8/23/2011<br />

Ans : Clause (iv) <strong>of</strong> section 28 brings to charge the value <strong>of</strong> any<br />

perquisite or benefit convertible into money or not arising from<br />

the exercise <strong>of</strong> business or pr<strong>of</strong>ession. Such benefit might have not<br />

been credited to the pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account or in the books <strong>of</strong><br />

account.<br />

The tax auditor is required to report in regard to items falling<br />

within the scope <strong>of</strong> section 28 whether or not they are entered into<br />

the books <strong>of</strong> account. If the books <strong>of</strong> account or any other<br />

supporting documents or records reflect or indicate enjoyment <strong>of</strong><br />

some such benefit, he may make further inquiries. Based on such<br />

inquiries, in exercise <strong>of</strong> his pr<strong>of</strong>essional judgment, he may report<br />

about such benefit appropriately. Where circumstances warrant it<br />

may be clarified that the information is not necessarily exhaustive<br />

and is given on the basis <strong>of</strong> the knowledge he acquired in the<br />

course <strong>of</strong> audit carried out in accordance with the normally<br />

accepted auditing practices.<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> an individual assessee certain incomes are<br />

exempt like<br />

a) share <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it from partnership firm – exempt u/s. 10(2A)<br />

b) income <strong>of</strong> minor children exempt u/s. 10(32) should such<br />

income also be disclosed under clause 13(d)<br />

99


8/23/2011<br />

Ans : Any income which could be ascertained from the<br />

books <strong>of</strong> account, records and information made<br />

available to the tax auditor has to be reported.<br />

However, the tax auditor should clearly state that such<br />

incomes are excludible under the relevant provisions<br />

<strong>of</strong> section 10.<br />

Clause 14.Particulars <strong>of</strong> depreciation allowable as per the<br />

Income tax Act, 1961 in respect <strong>of</strong> each asset or block <strong>of</strong> assets,<br />

as the case may be in the following form:<br />

a) Description <strong>of</strong> asset/block <strong>of</strong> assets<br />

b) Rate <strong>of</strong> depreciation<br />

c) Actual cost or the WDV as the case may be.<br />

d) Additions/deductions during the year with dates; in case <strong>of</strong> any<br />

addition <strong>of</strong> an asset, date put to use; including adjustments on<br />

account <strong>of</strong> Modvat, change in rate <strong>of</strong> exchange <strong>of</strong> currency,<br />

subsidy or grant or reimbursement, by whatever name called.<br />

e) Depreciation allowable<br />

f) Written down value at the end <strong>of</strong> the year<br />

100


8/23/2011<br />

Issues on Clause -14<br />

It is compulsory for all assessee to claim depreciation or<br />

additional depreciation in calculating taxable income otherwise no<br />

deduction will be allowed & WDV will be treated as reduced –<br />

Explanation 5 to Sec 32 (w.e.f A.Y. 2002-03).<br />

‗Allowable‖implies permissible deduction under provision <strong>of</strong> Act<br />

and Rules.<br />

―Used‖means actual use and is not kept ready for use.<br />

Assets used partly for Business purpose, deduction u/s 32(1)<br />

restricted to proportionate part.<br />

In clause 14 d(ii) adjustment is contemplated u/s 43A & AS-11 .<br />

U/s 43A deduction on cash basis but AS-11 (revised) deduction<br />

on accrual basis.<br />

No amendment is made in this respect in Schedule VI & in form<br />

3CD.<br />

Depreciation is not allowed on an amount equivalent to<br />

CENVAT credit claimed and allowed.<br />

Depreciation is allowed on ―Actual Cost‖-term defined<br />

u/s 43(1) <strong>of</strong> I.T. Act.<br />

An assessee can claim depreciation on actual cost even if<br />

he follows Cash method <strong>of</strong> accounting.<br />

Subsidy received over & above <strong>of</strong> WDV <strong>of</strong> block <strong>of</strong> asset<br />

in the absence <strong>of</strong> specific provisions not taxable.<br />

The interest relatable to any period after such asset is<br />

first put to use is not a part <strong>of</strong> actual cost.<br />

101


8/23/2011<br />

Sub clause (iia) to Sec 32(1) inserted by Finance Act,2002<br />

w.e.f A.Y. 2003-04 to provide additional depreciation on<br />

fulfillment <strong>of</strong> prescribed conditions.<br />

W.e.f 2006-07 additional depreciation allowed to all the<br />

assessee engaged in the business <strong>of</strong> manufacturing or<br />

production <strong>of</strong> any article or thing in respect <strong>of</strong> New<br />

machinery or Plant installed on or after 31stday <strong>of</strong><br />

March,2005.<br />

Depreciation debited to P&L a/c as per requirement <strong>of</strong><br />

Schedule VI not reported under clause –14.<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> dispute between assessee, department &<br />

Auditor regarding classification <strong>of</strong> assets, rate <strong>of</strong><br />

depreciation etc in earlier year a suitable disclosure is<br />

required.<br />

Please clarify the basis upon which depreciation will<br />

be allowed under cash system . Will it be allowed on<br />

full cost or will it be limited to the actual payment<br />

made during the relevant previous year?<br />

102


8/23/2011<br />

Ans: For the purpose <strong>of</strong> calculating the depreciation allowable<br />

under the Income-tax Act the basis will be the actual cost as<br />

defined in section 43(1) <strong>of</strong> the Income-tax Act. Accordingly,<br />

even if an assessee is following cash method <strong>of</strong> accounting<br />

depreciation has to be allowed on the full actual cost even if<br />

only a portion <strong>of</strong> it might have been paid in cash during the<br />

relevant previous year. It is because <strong>of</strong> the fact that when the<br />

asset is used in business, the whole <strong>of</strong> the asset is used and not a<br />

part proportionate to the cash paid.<br />

(a) In the circumstances where depreciation has not<br />

been claimed in the accounts and is not likely to be<br />

claimed in the return also, should the tax auditor state<br />

the particulars <strong>of</strong> depreciation under clause 14 or not?<br />

b) The assessee wants to claim less depreciation than<br />

allowable under Income tax Act. It is permissible?<br />

What is the duty <strong>of</strong> the tax auditor in this regard?<br />

103


8/23/2011<br />

Ans : That the Finance Act, 2001, with effect from 1st April<br />

2002, has inserted Explanation 5 below section 32 (1) to<br />

provide that the provisions <strong>of</strong> sub section (1) shall apply<br />

whether or not the assessee has claimed the deduction in<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> depreciation in computing total income. In other<br />

words, the effect <strong>of</strong> the Explanation is that the depreciation<br />

would be considered in computing total income irrespective<br />

<strong>of</strong> the fact whether a claim is made or not. Further, it is not<br />

open to an assessee to claim lesser depreciation than the<br />

prescribed rate.<br />

Where, however, an assessee chooses to claim depreciation at a<br />

lower rate or does not claim or does not intend to claim<br />

depreciation, the tax auditor, as such, does not have to calculate the<br />

depreciation on his own. It would be sufficient for him to state in<br />

the report that the assessee does not intend to claim the<br />

depreciation or has claimed depreciation at a lower rate and give<br />

the necessary facts, if any, relating thereto. There may also be a<br />

situation where the assessee does not want to claim depreciation<br />

but is willing to give all the particulars necessary for calculating<br />

depreciation. The tax auditor in that case can compute the<br />

allowable depreciation and provide the required information under<br />

the clause.<br />

104


8/23/2011<br />

Under Explanation 10 to section 43(1) any subsidy<br />

received from Government towards an asset should be<br />

reduced from the cost <strong>of</strong> the asset. What is the position if<br />

in a given case, a subsidy <strong>of</strong> Rs. 3/- lacs is received<br />

during the year (against a claim made few years ago) in<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> an asset with a present WDV <strong>of</strong> Rs. 2/- lacs?<br />

Indicate the treatment to be accorded to the excess<br />

subsidy <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1/- lac over the WDV.<br />

Ans : The Subsidy received should be reduced from the WDV<br />

so as to reduce the balance in the block to Zero. The<br />

excess, if any, over and above WDV does not appear to be<br />

taxable in absence <strong>of</strong> a specific provision to that effect.<br />

Section 50 also does not appear to be attracted as there is<br />

no transfer <strong>of</strong> the asset.<br />

105


8/23/2011<br />

Clause 15. Amounts admissible under sections<br />

33AB, 33ABA, 35, 35ABB, 35AC, 35CCA, 35CCB, 35D,<br />

35DD, 35DDA, 35E<br />

a. debited to the pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account (showing the amount debited and<br />

deduction allowable under each section separately;<br />

b. not debited to the pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account<br />

• Section 33AB: Tea / C<strong>of</strong>fee / Rubber Development Account<br />

• Section 33ABA: Site Restoration Fund<br />

• Section 35: Expenditure on Scientific Research<br />

• Section 35ABB: Expenditure for obtaining license to operate telecom services<br />

• Section 35AC: Expenditure on eligible projects/schemes<br />

• Section 35CCA: Expenditure by way <strong>of</strong> payments to associations and<br />

institutions for carrying out rural development programmes<br />

• Section 35D: Amortization <strong>of</strong> certain preliminary expenses<br />

• Section 35E: Deduction for expenditure on prospecting etc. for certain minerals<br />

Clause 16a. Any sum paid to an employee as bonus or commission<br />

for services rendered, where such sum was otherwise payable to him<br />

as pr<strong>of</strong>its or dividend<br />

‣If any such sum is paid, this would not be normally allowed as<br />

deduction<br />

‣The requirement is only in respect <strong>of</strong> disclosure, the tax auditor is<br />

not expected to express an opinion about the allowability or<br />

otherwise<br />

‣The tax auditor should verify the contract with the employees so as<br />

to ascertain the nature <strong>of</strong> payments<br />

106


8/23/2011<br />

Clause 16b. Any sum received from employees towards contributions to<br />

any provident fund or superannuation fund or any other fund mentioned in<br />

section 2(24)(x); and due date for payment and the actual date <strong>of</strong> payment<br />

to the concerned authorities under section 36(1)(va)<br />

‣ Deduction <strong>of</strong> such sums received from the employees is allowed, if it is<br />

credited by assessee to the account <strong>of</strong> employees on or before the due date<br />

as per the applicable law.<br />

‣ Otherwise, the same is treated as his income under Section 2(24)(x)<br />

‣ Tax auditor should get a list <strong>of</strong> various contributions recovered from the<br />

employees and verify the actual payments from the evidence available.<br />

Clause 16:<br />

Bonus, Commission, PF recoveries etc.:<br />

M/s. A Pvt. Ltd pays service charges to its Director<br />

Mr.Z, amounting to Rs. 1 lakh. Mr. Z is holding 50%<br />

<strong>of</strong> the shares in M/s. A Pvt. Ltd. Please clarify<br />

whether the same has to be reported under this clause?<br />

107


8/23/2011<br />

Ans: It is not clear whether Mr. Z is an employee <strong>of</strong> the<br />

company Assuming that he is also an employee <strong>of</strong> the company,<br />

if it established that the amount <strong>of</strong> Rs. 1 lakh in sum and<br />

substance constituted dividend, the tax auditor has to report<br />

under sub-clause (a). However, if such service charges are<br />

payable to Mr. z for services rendered to the company and have<br />

no connection with the appropriation <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>its in any manner,<br />

there is no reporting requirement.<br />

The assessee applied for a P.F. No. in time but the<br />

same was not allotted within a reasonable time due<br />

to departmental delay. The assessee duly made a<br />

provision for the contribution by the employer in<br />

its pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account and balance sheet. But<br />

the same could not be remitted to the authorities<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the non allotment <strong>of</strong> P.F. No. Please<br />

clarify the duty <strong>of</strong> the tax auditor in this regard.<br />

108


8/23/2011<br />

Ans: The objective <strong>of</strong> Sub-clause (b) is to get information in<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> sums recovered from employees towards<br />

provident fund contributions etc. and the dates on which<br />

such contributions were remitted to the statutory<br />

authorities. This information is necessary to determine the<br />

allowability <strong>of</strong> the payment <strong>of</strong> such contributions under the<br />

provisions <strong>of</strong> section 36(1)(va). In the given issue the<br />

assessee has not remitted the contribution to the statutory<br />

authorities, whatever be the reasons therefore. The tax<br />

auditor has indicate the factual position in this regard.<br />

Please clarify whether the grace period <strong>of</strong> 5days<br />

should be considered while determining due date for<br />

payment <strong>of</strong> PF, ESIC contributions for reporting under<br />

section 36(1)(va) read with sections 2(24) (x) and 43 -<br />

B<br />

109


8/23/2011<br />

Ans: The following extracts from the judgement <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Income-tax Appellate Tribunal in Hunsur Plywood<br />

Works Ltd., V. Deputy Commission <strong>of</strong> Income-tax<br />

(1995) 54 ITD 394 will make the position clear.<br />

―Paragraph 38 <strong>of</strong> the Employees‘ Provident Funds<br />

Scheme, 1952 says that the amounts under<br />

consideration in respect <strong>of</strong> wages <strong>of</strong> the employees for<br />

any particular month shall be paid within 15 days <strong>of</strong><br />

the close <strong>of</strong> every month.<br />

Clause (iii) <strong>of</strong> CPFC's Circular NO.E. 128(1) 60-111 dated 19-3-<br />

1964 as modified by Circular No. E. 11/128 (section 14-B<br />

Amendment)/73 dated 24-10-1973 allows five days <strong>of</strong> grace<br />

period to the employers for payment <strong>of</strong> provident fund<br />

contribution, administrative charges and inspection charges. The<br />

said Circular also states that if payment be made within the said<br />

period <strong>of</strong> grace, no damages as per section 14-B <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Employees's Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions<br />

Act, 1952 shall be levied. Furthermore, our attention has also<br />

been drawn to CPFC's Circular No. E.128(1 )60-IV dated 29-4-<br />

1967 in clause (iii) <strong>of</strong> which it has been stated that the Central<br />

Board <strong>of</strong> Trustees at its meeting on 13-4-1967 agreed that if<br />

payment was made within grace period already allowed by it,<br />

then such payments should not be counted as default even for<br />

the purpose <strong>of</strong> counting the number <strong>of</strong> defaults ……(Page 399)<br />

110


8/23/2011<br />

Thus, we find that from strict judicial angle, the period or days <strong>of</strong><br />

grace would seem to be falling within a twilight region. The<br />

period certainly follows the exact due date but at the same time<br />

no action by the other side is possible within the said period<br />

except for registering a protest. Since the present issue is<br />

required to be resolved from practical angle, as discussed by us<br />

above, we are required to examine the consequences <strong>of</strong> making<br />

<strong>of</strong> payment <strong>of</strong> the employees' contribution to the EPF etc., within<br />

five days' period <strong>of</strong> grace.<br />

We find that if an employer makes payment within such period <strong>of</strong><br />

grace, not only is he not liable to pay any damages in accordance<br />

with the Employees' Provident Fund Scheme and the relevant<br />

Act, but by virtue <strong>of</strong> the Circular dated 29-4-1967 as mentioned<br />

above, he will also not be treated to be in default. Hence, we<br />

ultimately hold that from practical point <strong>of</strong> view, the five days'<br />

period <strong>of</strong> grace after 15th <strong>of</strong> the succeeding months is to be<br />

considered merely as an extension <strong>of</strong> the early 15 days and all the<br />

consequences <strong>of</strong> making payment within the said 15 days should<br />

be considered to follow if the payment be made within the grace<br />

period following the said period <strong>of</strong> 15 days.― (Page 400).<br />

Also refer to CIT v. Salem Cooperative Spinning Mills Ltd.<br />

[2002J 258 ITR 360 (Mad).<br />

111


8/23/2011<br />

Clause 17. Amounts debited to Pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account, being :-<br />

Clause 17a. Expenditure <strong>of</strong> Capital nature<br />

‣ Capital expenditure, if any, debited to the pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account<br />

to be disclosed stating the amounts under various heads separately<br />

‣Tax auditor needs to scrutinize records and obtain information and<br />

make necessary inquiries in this behalf<br />

‣ General tests should be applied to determine whether a particular<br />

expenditure is <strong>of</strong> a capital nature i.e.<br />

• where it brings into existence an asset or<br />

• advantage <strong>of</strong> enduring benefit, or<br />

• whether it relates to the frame work <strong>of</strong> the assessee‘s<br />

business etc.<br />

Clause 17b. Expenditure <strong>of</strong> personal nature<br />

‣ Tax auditor needs to scrutinize the ledger to verify whether any<br />

expenses <strong>of</strong> personal nature have been incurred by the assessee.<br />

‣ Section 227(1A) requires the auditor to inquire whether personal<br />

expenses have been charged to the revenue account.<br />

‣Note: According to the information and explanation given by the<br />

assessee, no personal expenses have been debited to the pr<strong>of</strong>it and<br />

loss account other than those payable under contractual<br />

obligations or in accordance with the generally accepted business<br />

practice.<br />

112


8/23/2011<br />

Clause 17c. Expenditure on advertisement in any souvenir,<br />

brochure, tract, pamphlet, or the like, published by a political party<br />

‣If there is any such expenditure debited to the pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss<br />

account, the same will be disallowed under section 37(2B) and has<br />

to be reported under the above clause.<br />

‣For this purpose the tax auditor should scrutinize the ledger<br />

accounts and make enquiries in this behalf.<br />

Clause 17d. Expenditure incurred at clubs-<br />

(i) As entrance fees and subscriptions<br />

(ii) As cost for club services and facilities used<br />

‣ The expenditure may be incurred for directors, employees,<br />

partner, proprietors.<br />

‣ The fact that whether they are <strong>of</strong> personal nature or incurred<br />

in the course <strong>of</strong> business should be ascertained. If they are <strong>of</strong><br />

personal nature, they should be shown under clause 17b.<br />

‣The tax auditor should make a close scrutiny <strong>of</strong> the ledger in<br />

such cases<br />

113


8/23/2011<br />

Clause 17e.<br />

i. Expenditure by way <strong>of</strong> penalty or fine for violation <strong>of</strong> any law<br />

for the time being in force<br />

ii.<br />

iii.<br />

Any other penalty or fine<br />

Expenditure incurred for any purpose which is an <strong>of</strong>fence or<br />

which is prohibited by law<br />

‣ Tax auditor should obtain in writing the details <strong>of</strong> all payments<br />

made by way <strong>of</strong> penalty or fine from the assessee and how such<br />

amounts have been dealt in the books <strong>of</strong> accounts<br />

‣ The tax auditor is not required to express any opinion as to allow<br />

ability or otherwise <strong>of</strong> amount.<br />

‣ It does not cover payment for contractual breach.<br />

Note: The assessee has represented that, the assessee has not<br />

incurred:<br />

i. any expenditure by way <strong>of</strong> penalty or fine for violation <strong>of</strong><br />

any law for the time being in force;<br />

ii.<br />

any other penalty or fine; and<br />

iii.<br />

any expenditure for any purpose which is an <strong>of</strong>fence or<br />

which is prohibited by law.<br />

114


8/23/2011<br />

Clause 17f. Amounts inadmissible under section 40(a)<br />

It basically includes :<br />

‣ Interest, royalty, fees for technical services or any other sum<br />

payable outside India or in India to a non resident or a foreign<br />

company<br />

‣ Interest, commission or brokerage, rent, royalty, fees for<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional or technical services, payments to resident<br />

contractors/subcontractors<br />

‣ Securities transaction tax, Fringe benefit tax, Income tax and<br />

Wealth tax<br />

‣Salaries payable outside India or to a non resident on which tax has<br />

not been deducted at source<br />

‣Tax actually paid by an employer referred to in section 10(10CC)<br />

‣ In case <strong>of</strong> any interest, commission or brokerage, rent, royalty,<br />

fees for pr<strong>of</strong>essional services or fees for technical services to a<br />

resident, or amounts payable to a contractor or sub-contractor,<br />

being resident; on which tax has not been deducted, or after<br />

deduction, has not been paid<br />

‣ No disallowance if tax paid before due date for filing return.<br />

There will be no disallowance <strong>of</strong> any interest, commission or<br />

brokerage, rent, royalty, fees for pr<strong>of</strong>essional services or fees for<br />

technical services payable to a resident, or amounts payable to a<br />

resident contractor or sub-contractor for carrying out any work if<br />

after deduction <strong>of</strong> tax during the previous year, it is paid on or<br />

before the due date <strong>of</strong> filing <strong>of</strong> return <strong>of</strong> income specified in<br />

section 139(1). [s. 40(a)(ia) ; w.e.f. 01.04.2010 : FA 2010]<br />

115


8/23/2011<br />

Clause 17g. Interest, salary, bonus, commission or remuneration<br />

admissible under section 40(b)/40(ba) and computation there<strong>of</strong><br />

‣ Tax auditor is required to state the inadmissible amount under<br />

this clause after applying the conditions for allowance or<br />

disallowance and accordingly determine the prima facie<br />

inadmissibility <strong>of</strong> the deduction and also quantify the same<br />

‣ Conditions for admissibility:<br />

a. Remuneration to working partner<br />

b. Remuneration/interest is authorized by partnership deed<br />

c. The interest should not exceed 12% p.a. and the remuneration<br />

should not exceed the maximum permissible limits.<br />

d. The same should not pertain to a period prior to the date <strong>of</strong><br />

partnership deed.<br />

Firm<br />

<br />

Section 40 (b): Uniform limit has been fixed for both pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

firms and non-pr<strong>of</strong>essional firms in respect <strong>of</strong> payments <strong>of</strong> salary,<br />

bonus, commission or remuneration to the working partners: - w.e.f.<br />

01.04.2010<br />

Book Pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

On the first Rs.3,00,000 <strong>of</strong> the bookpr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

On the balance <strong>of</strong> the book-pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

Allowable Remuneration<br />

Rs. 1,50,000/- or 90% <strong>of</strong> the bookpr<strong>of</strong>it,<br />

whichever is more.<br />

60% <strong>of</strong> book-pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> loss Rs. 1,50,000/-<br />

116


8/23/2011<br />

40(ba) Payment Of Interest Salary, Bonus, Commission Or<br />

Remuneration Made By AOP/BOI To Its Members<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> a AOP/BOI any payment <strong>of</strong> interest,<br />

salary, bonus commission or remuneration made by<br />

such AOP/BOI to any <strong>of</strong> its member.<br />

Note:<br />

1. Interest paid to member - Interest received from such member<br />

= Net to be disallowed.<br />

2. If member in individual capacity, then interest paid in<br />

representative capacity be allowed.<br />

3. If member in representative capacity, then interest<br />

paid in individual capacity be allowed.<br />

4. Salary paid in any capacity is to be disallowed.<br />

117


8/23/2011<br />

Clause 17h.(A). Whether a certificate has been obtained from the<br />

assessee regarding payments relating to any expenditure covered<br />

under section 40A(3) that the payments were made by account payee<br />

cheques drawn on a bank or account payee draft, as the case may be,<br />

[Yes/No]<br />

‣ Confirmation <strong>of</strong> obtaining a certificate from the assessee regarding<br />

payments relating to any expenditure covered under section 40A(3)<br />

to be given in the above clause<br />

‣ Management Representation obtained from clients could be<br />

regarded as a certificate for this clause<br />

‣ Certificate need not be attached with the Tax Audit Report<br />

Clause 17h. (B) amount inadmissible under section 40A(3), read with<br />

rule 6DD [with break up <strong>of</strong> inadmissible amounts]<br />

‣ Section 40A(3) provides that where assessee incurs any expenditure<br />

in respect <strong>of</strong> which payment is made in a sum exceeding Rs.20,000<br />

otherwise than by a account payee cheque / account payee bank draft,<br />

no deduction shall be allowed in respect <strong>of</strong> such expenditure.<br />

‣ Tax auditor should obtain a list <strong>of</strong> all payments exceeding Rs. 20,000<br />

made by the assessee during the previous year which should also<br />

include the list <strong>of</strong> payments exempted in terms <strong>of</strong> Rule 6DD with<br />

reasons.<br />

‣ List should be verified by the tax auditor with the books <strong>of</strong> account in<br />

order to ascertain whether the conditions for specific exemption granted<br />

in Rule 6DD are satisfied.<br />

‣Details <strong>of</strong> payments which do not satisfy the above conditions should<br />

be stated under this clause<br />

118


8/23/2011<br />

Note: The assessee maintains that all payments for expenses<br />

made from bank accounts in excess <strong>of</strong> Rs. 20,000/- have been<br />

made by account payee cheques or account payee bank drafts.<br />

However, this could not be verified by the examining Chartered<br />

Accountants as the necessary evidence is not in the possession <strong>of</strong><br />

the assessee.<br />

40A(3) and 40A(3A) Payments Made Otherwise Than By<br />

Account Payee Cheque Or Account Payee Bank Draft<br />

Section 40A(3) shall be attracted if the following<br />

conditions are fulfilled:<br />

‣ Assessee incurs any expenditure<br />

‣ in respect <strong>of</strong> which payment or aggregate <strong>of</strong><br />

payments made<br />

‣ to a person<br />

‣ in a single day<br />

‣ Of a sum exceeding Rs.20,000/-<br />

‣ Otherwise than by account payee cheque or<br />

account payee demand draft<br />

119


8/23/2011<br />

Section 40A(3A): Where an allowance has been made in the<br />

assessment for any year in respect <strong>of</strong> any liability incurred<br />

by the assessee for any expenditure and subsequently<br />

during any previous year (hereinafter referred to as<br />

subsequent year) the assessee makes payment in respect<br />

there<strong>of</strong>, otherwise than by an account payee cheque<br />

drawn on a bank or account payee bank draft, the<br />

payment so made shall be deemed to be the pr<strong>of</strong>its and<br />

gains <strong>of</strong> business or pr<strong>of</strong>ession and accordingly<br />

chargeable to income-tax as income <strong>of</strong> the subsequent<br />

year if the payment or aggregate <strong>of</strong> payments made to<br />

a person in a day, exceeds Rs. 20,000/-.<br />

Transportation<br />

Section 40 (3A):<br />

<br />

Newly inserted proviso provides that in case <strong>of</strong> payment made for plying,<br />

hiring or leasing goods carriages,<br />

the limit will be Rs. 35,000/- instead <strong>of</strong> Rs. 20,000/-,<br />

<br />

in respect <strong>of</strong> disallowance where the payment is made in cash or<br />

otherwise than by way <strong>of</strong> account payee cheque or DD. - w.e.f. 01.10.2009<br />

120


8/23/2011<br />

Rule 6DD – Disallowance <strong>of</strong> cash payments<br />

As per Rule 6DD as amended by Rules 2007 ‗no disallowance shall<br />

be made even if payment is made in excess <strong>of</strong> Rs. 20,000, in<br />

the cases and circumstances specified hereunder, namely:-<br />

- Where payment is made toi.<br />

RBI<br />

ii. SBI<br />

iii. Any co-operative bank or land mortgage bank<br />

iv. Any primary agricultural credit society<br />

v. LIC<br />

It may be noted that sub-clauses vi) to xviii) [i.e payment to<br />

IDBI, ICICI, UTI etc] <strong>of</strong> the said rule have been omitted by<br />

Notification 208/2007, dated June 27, 2007.<br />

Notes:<br />

1. In certain cases as specified in Rule 6DD, payment in<br />

a sum exceeding Rs. 20,000/- may be made otherwise<br />

than by an account payee cheque/DD.<br />

2. Attar Singh Gurmukh Singh (Supreme Court) -<br />

Purchase <strong>of</strong> stock or raw material constitute<br />

expenditure. Section 40A(3) shall apply on payment<br />

made in this regard.<br />

121


8/23/2011<br />

3. Vijay Kumar Ajit Kumar - Section 40A(3) shall<br />

also apply in case <strong>of</strong> advance payment for the<br />

expenditure made otherwise than by account payee<br />

cheque. Disallowance shall be in the year in which<br />

expenditure is incurred.<br />

4. Section 40A(3) attracted for purchases made<br />

otherwise than by account payee cheque by Pucca<br />

Ahartiya and not attracted for purchases made by<br />

a Kachcha Ahartiya.<br />

40A(4) Payments Made By Account Payee Cheque in<br />

Violation <strong>of</strong> a Contract<br />

‣ Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law<br />

for the time being in force or in any contract,<br />

‣ where any payment in respect <strong>of</strong> any expenditure has<br />

to be made by an account payee cheque or an account<br />

payee bank draft in order that such expenditure may not<br />

be disallowed as deduction under section 40A(3),<br />

122


8/23/2011<br />

‣ then such payment may be made by such cheque or<br />

draft, and where the payment is so made,<br />

‣ no person shall be allowed to raise, in any suit or<br />

proceeding a plea on the ground that the payment<br />

was not made in cash or in any other manner.<br />

Where the payment is made by-<br />

i. Letter <strong>of</strong> credit<br />

ii.<br />

iii.<br />

iv.<br />

Mail or telegraphic transfer<br />

Book adjustment from one bank account to any other account<br />

Bill <strong>of</strong> exchange<br />

v. Use <strong>of</strong> electronic clearing system through bank account<br />

vi.<br />

vii.<br />

Credit card<br />

Debit card<br />

It may be noted that sub-clauses v) to vii) as above have been<br />

inserted by Notification no. 208/2007 dated June 27, 2007<br />

123


8/23/2011<br />

Clause 17i. Provision for payment <strong>of</strong> gratuity not allowable under<br />

section 40A(7)<br />

‣ As per section 40A(7), deduction <strong>of</strong> any provision is allowable<br />

only if provision is made for contribution to any approved gratuity<br />

fund or the provision relates to the amount <strong>of</strong> gratuity which has<br />

become payable during the previous year.<br />

‣ The tax auditor should call for the order <strong>of</strong> Commissioner <strong>of</strong> I.T<br />

granting approval for gratuity fund, verify the date from which it is<br />

effective and also verify whether the provision has been made as<br />

provided in the trust deed.<br />

40A(7) Employer’s Contribution To Gratuity Fund<br />

No deduction shall be allowed in respect <strong>of</strong> any<br />

provision made by the assessee for the payment <strong>of</strong><br />

gratuity to his employees on their retirement or<br />

termination <strong>of</strong> employment. However deduction shall<br />

be allowed in respect <strong>of</strong> (i) payment <strong>of</strong> a sum as<br />

contribution towards approved gratuity fund or (ii)<br />

Any provision made for the purpose <strong>of</strong> payment <strong>of</strong><br />

gratuity becoming payable during the year.<br />

124


8/23/2011<br />

Note: No deduction shall be allowed in respect <strong>of</strong> any<br />

provision made by the assessee for payment <strong>of</strong><br />

gratuity to his employees.<br />

Exceptions:<br />

1. Payment as contribution towards approved gratuity<br />

fund.<br />

2. Provisions made for payment <strong>of</strong> gratuity actually<br />

becoming payable during the previous year.<br />

Note: If the gratuity fund is unapproved, deduction for<br />

gratuity shall not be allowed even if the provision for<br />

gratuity is made as per Actuary.<br />

Note: If a policy is taken from LIC for providing<br />

gratuity to employees then annual premium is allowed<br />

as deduction u/s 37(1).<br />

125


8/23/2011<br />

Clause 17j. Any sum paid by the assessee as an employer not<br />

allowable under section 40A(9)<br />

‣ Under section 40 A(9), any payments made by an employer<br />

towards the setting up or formation <strong>of</strong> or as contribution to any fund,<br />

trust, company, or other institutions (other than contributions to<br />

recognised provident fund or approved superannuation fund or<br />

approved gratuity fund )is not allowable.<br />

‣ Tax auditor should furnish the details <strong>of</strong> payments which are not<br />

allowable under this section<br />

40A(9) Employer’s Contribution To Approved Gratuity<br />

Fund, Recognized Provident Fund Or Approved<br />

Superannuation Fund<br />

No deduction shall be allowed in respect <strong>of</strong> any sum<br />

paid by the assessee towards setting up or formation <strong>of</strong>,<br />

or as contribution to, any fund, trust, company,<br />

association <strong>of</strong> persons, body <strong>of</strong> individuals, society or<br />

any institution except where such sum is required to be<br />

paid under any law in force or where such sum is paid<br />

for an approved gratuity fund, recognised provident<br />

fund or approved superannuation fund.<br />

126


8/23/2011<br />

Clause 17k. Particulars <strong>of</strong> any liability <strong>of</strong> a contingent<br />

nature<br />

‣ Detailed scrutiny <strong>of</strong> account heads like outstanding<br />

liabilities, provision etc to be made to ascertain any such<br />

particulars <strong>of</strong> contingent nature debited to pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss<br />

account.<br />

Clause 17(l). Amount <strong>of</strong> deduction inadmissible in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

section 14A in respect <strong>of</strong> the expenditure incurred in relation to<br />

income which does not form part <strong>of</strong> the total income.:-<br />

‣ Section 14A provides that no deduction shall be made in respect<br />

<strong>of</strong> expenditure incurred by assessee in relation to income which is<br />

exempt from tax.<br />

‣ The tax auditor has to verify the details furnished by the assessee<br />

and should satisfy himself that the inadmissible amounts have<br />

been worked out correctly.<br />

‣ Where an assessee claims that no expenditure has been incurred<br />

by him in relation to income which does not form part <strong>of</strong> the total<br />

income under the Act and does not furnish the necessary<br />

particulars for the purpose <strong>of</strong> ascertaining the inadmissible<br />

expenditure under section 14A, the tax auditor has to make a<br />

proper disclaimer / qualification.<br />

127


8/23/2011<br />

Clause 17 (l): Section 14A<br />

Deduction inadmissible u/s14A in respect <strong>of</strong> the expenditure incurred in<br />

relation to income which does not form part <strong>of</strong> the total income( Subsection 1).<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

The AO, if he is not satisfied with the claim <strong>of</strong> the assessee, shall determine the<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> expenditure incurred, in relation to income which does not form part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

total income in accordance with method prescribed under rule 8D (w.e.f. 24-3-2008),<br />

( Subsection 2).<br />

the expenditure which the AO seeks to disallow under s. 14A should be actually<br />

incurred and so incurred with a view to producing non-taxable income (101 TTJ 369,<br />

ACIT vs Eicher Limited.)<br />

Rule 8D w.e.f. 24-3-2008: Method for determining amount <strong>of</strong> expenditure in relation<br />

to income not includible in total income.<br />

8D. (1) Where the Assessing Officer, having regard to the accounts <strong>of</strong> the assessee <strong>of</strong><br />

a previous year, is not satisfied with<br />

(a) the correctness <strong>of</strong> the claim <strong>of</strong> expenditure made by the assessee; or<br />

(b) the claim made by the assessee that no expenditure has been incurred in<br />

relation to income which does not form part <strong>of</strong> the total income under the Act for<br />

such previous year,he shall determine the amount <strong>of</strong> expenditure in relation to such<br />

income in accordance with the provisions <strong>of</strong> sub-rule (2).<br />

(2) The expenditure in relation to income which does not form part <strong>of</strong><br />

the total income shall be the aggregate <strong>of</strong> following amounts, namely :<br />

i. the amount <strong>of</strong> expenditure directly relating to income which does not<br />

form part <strong>of</strong> total income;<br />

ii. in a case where the assessee has incurred expenditure by way <strong>of</strong><br />

interest during the previous year which is not directly attributable to<br />

any particular income or receipt, an amount computed in<br />

accordance with the following formula, namely :<br />

A x B/C<br />

A = amount <strong>of</strong> expenditure by way o f interest other than the<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> interest included in clause (i) incurred during the<br />

previous year ;<br />

B = the average <strong>of</strong> value <strong>of</strong> investment, income from which<br />

does not or shall not form part <strong>of</strong> the total income, as<br />

appearing in the balance sheet <strong>of</strong> the assessee, on the<br />

first day and the last day <strong>of</strong> the previous year ;<br />

C = the average <strong>of</strong> total assets as appearing in the balance<br />

sheet <strong>of</strong> the assessee, on the first day and the last<br />

day <strong>of</strong> the revious year ;<br />

c<br />

Clause 17 (l): Rule 8D: Determination<br />

128


8/23/2011<br />

iii.<br />

an amount equal to one-half per cent <strong>of</strong> the average <strong>of</strong> the value<br />

<strong>of</strong> investment, income from which does not or shall not form<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the total income, as appearing in the balance sheet <strong>of</strong><br />

the assessee, on the first day and the last day <strong>of</strong> the previous<br />

year.<br />

3. For the purposes <strong>of</strong> this rule, the 'total assets' shall mean, total<br />

assets as appearing in the balance sheet excluding the<br />

increase on account <strong>of</strong> revaluation <strong>of</strong> assets but<br />

the decrease on account <strong>of</strong> revaluation <strong>of</strong> assets.<br />

including<br />

Clause 17m. Amount inadmissible under the proviso to section<br />

36(1)(iii)<br />

‣ Section 36(1)(iii) provides that interest on borrowed capital<br />

would be deductible only if :<br />

a) The assessee has borrowed money.<br />

b) It is used for the purpose <strong>of</strong> business and pr<strong>of</strong>ession.<br />

c) Interest is paid/payable on such money.<br />

‣ The proviso to the above section requires that capital borrowed<br />

for acquisition <strong>of</strong> asset for extension <strong>of</strong> existing business or<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ession for any period beginning from the date on which the<br />

capital was borrowed for acquisition <strong>of</strong> the asset till the date on<br />

which such asset was first put to use shall not be allowed as a<br />

deduction.<br />

‣ Tax auditor has to thus report the amount inadmissible under<br />

the above proviso.<br />

129


8/23/2011<br />

Clause 17A.<br />

Amount <strong>of</strong> interest inadmissible under section 23 <strong>of</strong> the Micro,<br />

Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006.<br />

‣The auditor should report here the amount <strong>of</strong> interest paid to the<br />

Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises.<br />

Notification No. 36/2009<br />

This is a new clause inserted by the Central Board <strong>of</strong> Direct<br />

Taxes through its Notification No. 36/2009 dated 13-4-2009, in<br />

the Form No.3CD in Appendix II <strong>of</strong> the Income-tax Rules,<br />

1962<br />

The tax auditor is required to state the amount <strong>of</strong> interest<br />

inadmissible under section 23 <strong>of</strong> the Micro, Small and Medium<br />

Enterprises Development Act, 2006.<br />

The Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act,<br />

2006 (MSME Act) is an Act to provide for facilitating the<br />

promotion and development and enhancing the<br />

competitiveness <strong>of</strong> micro, small and medium enterprises and<br />

for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.<br />

130


8/23/2011<br />

Section 23 <strong>of</strong> the MSME Act<br />

‣ Section 23 <strong>of</strong> the MSME Act lays down that an interest<br />

payable or paid by the buyer, under or in accordance with<br />

the provisions <strong>of</strong> this Act, shall not for the purposes<br />

<strong>of</strong> the computation <strong>of</strong> income under the Income-tax<br />

Act,1961 be allowed as a deduction.<br />

‣ The inadmissible interest has to be determined on the<br />

basis <strong>of</strong> the provisions <strong>of</strong> the MSME Act.<br />

‣ Section 16 <strong>of</strong> the MSME Act provides for the date from<br />

which and the rate at which the interest is payable.<br />

‣ Accordingly, where a buyer fails to make payment <strong>of</strong><br />

the amount to the supplier, as required under section<br />

15, the buyer shall, notwithstanding anything contained<br />

in any agreement between the buyer and the supplier<br />

or any law for the time being in force, be liable to pay<br />

compound interest with monthly rests to the supplier<br />

on that amount from the appointed date or, as the case<br />

may be, from the date immediately following the date<br />

agreed upon, at three times <strong>of</strong> the bank rate notified by<br />

the Reserve Bank.<br />

131


8/23/2011<br />

Section 15 <strong>of</strong> the MSME Act<br />

Section 15 <strong>of</strong> the MSME Act, requires the buyer to make<br />

payment on or before the date agreed upon in writing, or<br />

where there is no agreement in this behalf, before the<br />

appointed day. It also provides that the period agreed<br />

upon in writing shall not exceed forty five days from the<br />

day <strong>of</strong> acceptance or the day <strong>of</strong> deemed acceptance.<br />

Section 22 <strong>of</strong> the MSME Act<br />

Section 22 <strong>of</strong> the MSME Act provides that where any buyer is<br />

required to get his annual accounts audited under any law for<br />

the time being in force, such buyer shall furnish the following<br />

additional information in his annual statement <strong>of</strong> accounts,<br />

namely:-<br />

132


8/23/2011<br />

i. The principal amount and interest due thereon (to be<br />

shown separately) remaining unpaid to any supplier as at<br />

the end <strong>of</strong> each accounting year.<br />

<br />

ii. The amount <strong>of</strong> interest paid by the buyer in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

Section 16, along with the amount <strong>of</strong> payment made to<br />

supplier beyond the appointed date during each<br />

accounting year.<br />

iii. The amount <strong>of</strong> interest due and payable for the delay in making<br />

payment (which have been paid but beyond the appointed day<br />

during the year) but without adding the interest specified under<br />

this Act.<br />

<br />

iv. The amount <strong>of</strong> interest accrued and remaining unpaid at the end<br />

<strong>of</strong> each accounting year; and<br />

v. The amount <strong>of</strong> further interest remaining due and payable even<br />

in the succeeding years, until such date when the interest dues as<br />

above are actually paid to the small enterprise, for the purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

disallowance as a deductible expenditure under section 23.<br />

133


8/23/2011<br />

Where the tax auditor is issuing his report in Form<br />

No.3CB, he should verify that the financial statements<br />

audited by him contain the information as prescribed<br />

under section 22 <strong>of</strong> the MSME Act. If no disclosure is<br />

made by the auditee in the financial statements he should<br />

give an appropriate qualification in Form No.3CB, in<br />

addition to the reporting requirement in clause 17A <strong>of</strong><br />

Form No. 3CD.<br />

Clause 18. Particulars <strong>of</strong> payments made to persons specified under<br />

section 40A(2)(b)<br />

‣ Section 40A(2) provides that expenditure for which payment has<br />

been or is to be made to specified persons may be disallowed<br />

(excess portion) if in opinion <strong>of</strong> A.O, such expenditure is excessive<br />

or unreasonable having regard to,<br />

1. Fair Market value.<br />

2. Legitimate needs <strong>of</strong> business/pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />

3. Benefit derived by assessee<br />

‣ Tax auditor should obtain a full list <strong>of</strong> specified persons as<br />

contemplated in this section and obtain details <strong>of</strong><br />

expenditure/payments made to specified persons<br />

‣ Tax auditor should scrutinize all items <strong>of</strong> payments to above<br />

persons<br />

134


8/23/2011<br />

If necessary, indicate in Form 3CD by way <strong>of</strong> a note as under :<br />

―The Company does not have a complete list <strong>of</strong> "relatives" <strong>of</strong><br />

directors or a list <strong>of</strong> "persons" who carry on business or pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />

in which a director <strong>of</strong> the Company or a relative <strong>of</strong> such director or<br />

such individuals together with the assessee Company has/have a<br />

substantial interest. According to the information with the<br />

Company, the Company has certified that there are no payments<br />

other than disclosed above made to persons specified in Section<br />

40A(2)(b) <strong>of</strong> the Income tax Act; this has not been verified by the<br />

auditors.‖<br />

Chart <strong>of</strong> persons specified in Section<br />

40A(2)(b)<br />

Individual Firm Association<br />

<strong>of</strong> persons<br />

HUF<br />

Company<br />

His<br />

relatives<br />

Its<br />

Partners<br />

Its<br />

Members<br />

Its<br />

Members<br />

Its<br />

Directors<br />

Their<br />

relatives<br />

Their<br />

relatives<br />

Their<br />

relatives<br />

Their<br />

relatives<br />

135


8/23/2011<br />

Where person having substantial interest in<br />

the business or pr<strong>of</strong>ession <strong>of</strong> the assessee is<br />

Individual Firm Associatio<br />

n <strong>of</strong><br />

persons<br />

His<br />

relatives<br />

Its<br />

Partners<br />

Its<br />

Members<br />

HUF<br />

Its<br />

Members<br />

Company<br />

Its<br />

Directors<br />

Their<br />

relatives<br />

Their<br />

relatives<br />

Their<br />

relatives<br />

Their<br />

relatives<br />

Note : where one or more the persons falling in any <strong>of</strong><br />

the above categories (i.e. individual and his relatives,<br />

firm, its partners and their relatives, etc.) have<br />

substantial interest in the business or pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />

carried on by any person – that person is also covered<br />

under section 40A(2)(b)<br />

136


8/23/2011<br />

Note: Where one or more <strong>of</strong> the persons falling in any <strong>of</strong> the above<br />

categories (i.e. individual and his relatives, firm, its partners and their<br />

relatives, etc.) have substantial interest in the business or pr<strong>of</strong>ession<br />

carried on by any person - that person is also covered under<br />

section 40A(2)(b)<br />

PART III<br />

Director Partner Member <strong>of</strong> AOP Member <strong>of</strong> HUF<br />

Companies in<br />

which he is a<br />

Director<br />

All other<br />

Directors <strong>of</strong><br />

such<br />

companies<br />

Firm in which he<br />

Is a partner<br />

All other partners<br />

Of such firms<br />

AOP <strong>of</strong> which he is a<br />

member<br />

All other members <strong>of</strong><br />

such HUF<br />

All other members <strong>of</strong><br />

such HUF<br />

Their Relatives Their relatives Their relatives Their relatives<br />

137


8/23/2011<br />

Notes:<br />

1. Relative is defined in section 2(41) as including husband, wife, brother, sister or<br />

any lineal ascendant or descendent <strong>of</strong> the individual.<br />

2. "Person having a substantial interest" is explained in section 40-A as under:<br />

i. In the case <strong>of</strong> company - the person concerned is, at any time, during the<br />

previous year the beneficial owner <strong>of</strong> shares (not being shares entitled to a<br />

fixed rate <strong>of</strong> dividend whether with or without a right to participate in pr<strong>of</strong>its)<br />

carrying not less than 20% <strong>of</strong> the voting power.<br />

ii.<br />

In other cases - such person is at any time during the previous year,<br />

beneficially entitled to not less than 20% <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>its <strong>of</strong> such<br />

business or pr<strong>of</strong>ession.<br />

Clause 19 :- Amounts deemed to be pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains<br />

under section 33AB or 33ABA or 33AC<br />

‣ Sections 33AB and 33ABA lay down the<br />

circumstances under which amount withdrawn from<br />

deposits covered thereby for purposes other than<br />

specified purposes, is to be deemed income chargeable<br />

as pr<strong>of</strong>its and gains. Tax auditor is required to report<br />

such amounts<br />

138


8/23/2011<br />

Clause 20 :- Any amount <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it chargeable to tax under section 41 and<br />

computation there<strong>of</strong><br />

Section 41 mainly includes<br />

a.) Recovery <strong>of</strong> any loss, expenditure or trading liability, earlier allowed as<br />

deduction.<br />

b.) In case <strong>of</strong> undertaking engaged in generation/ distribution <strong>of</strong> power, if building,<br />

machinery, plant or furniture is sold/discarded/demolished or destroyed.<br />

c.) When an asset used for scientific research is sold.<br />

d.) Subsequent recovery <strong>of</strong> bad debt, earlier allowed as deduction.<br />

e.) Amount withdrawn from special reserve created under section 36(1)(viii).<br />

Clause 21:- In respect <strong>of</strong> any sum referred to in clause (a), (b), (c),<br />

(d), (e) or (f) <strong>of</strong> section 43B, the liability for which;<br />

(A)pre-existed on the first day <strong>of</strong> the previous year but was not<br />

allowed in the assessment <strong>of</strong> any preceding previous year and was<br />

(a) paid during the previous year;<br />

(b) not paid during the previous year;<br />

• Trace the amount <strong>of</strong> liability which was pre-existed on 1 st April<br />

2009 from statements attached to the Tax audit report for clause<br />

21(i)(A) & 21(i)(B) for the year ended 31 st March, 2009.<br />

• Obtain the closing balance from the trial balance for the year<br />

ended 31.03.09<br />

• E. g. Bonus to employees, Compensated Absences<br />

139


8/23/2011<br />

(B) was incurred in the previous year and was<br />

a) paid on or before the due date for furnishing the return <strong>of</strong> income <strong>of</strong><br />

the previous year under section 139(1);<br />

(b)not paid on or before the aforesaid date<br />

• Trace the closing balances <strong>of</strong> unpaid liability from the audited trial<br />

balance (current liability).<br />

• Obtain the details <strong>of</strong> subsequent payment from the client.<br />

• Verified respective ledger accounts to verify the subsequent payments<br />

remained unpaid.<br />

• E.g. Excise duty, Sales Tax / Value Added Tax, Work Contract Tax,<br />

Commission to Managing, Bonus to employees , Leave Encashment, P<br />

F contribution, ESIC contribution, Gratuity - Officers‗, Interest<br />

accrued but not due<br />

In respect <strong>of</strong> the expenditure covered by clauses (a) to<br />

(f) <strong>of</strong> section<br />

43B, the particulars may be furnished in the following<br />

form,<br />

140


8/23/2011<br />

A) Liability pre- existing on first day <strong>of</strong> previous year<br />

Sr.<br />

No.<br />

Nature<br />

liability<br />

<strong>of</strong><br />

Outstan<br />

ding<br />

opening<br />

balance<br />

not<br />

allowed<br />

in any<br />

earlier<br />

previous<br />

year(s)<br />

Amount<br />

paid/set<br />

<strong>of</strong>f<br />

during<br />

the year<br />

against<br />

column<br />

3<br />

Amount<br />

written<br />

back to<br />

the<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

and loss<br />

account<br />

Amount<br />

remainin<br />

g unpaid<br />

as at the<br />

end <strong>of</strong><br />

the year<br />

Whether<br />

passed<br />

through<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>it &<br />

loss<br />

account<br />

Remark<br />

s<br />

1 2 3 4 5 (3-4-<br />

5)=6<br />

7 8<br />

B) Liability Incurred during the Previous year<br />

Sr.<br />

No<br />

.<br />

Nature <strong>of</strong><br />

liability<br />

Amount<br />

incurred<br />

during the<br />

previous<br />

year but<br />

remaining<br />

outstanding<br />

as on the<br />

last day <strong>of</strong><br />

the previous<br />

year)<br />

Amount paid/set<br />

<strong>of</strong>f before the<br />

due date <strong>of</strong><br />

filing<br />

return/date upto<br />

which reported<br />

in the tax audit<br />

report,<br />

whichever is<br />

earlier against<br />

column (3)<br />

Amount<br />

unpaid on<br />

the due date<br />

<strong>of</strong> filing the<br />

return/date<br />

upto which<br />

reported in<br />

the tax<br />

audit report<br />

whichever<br />

is earlier<br />

Whether<br />

passed<br />

through<br />

the pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

& loss<br />

account<br />

Rema<br />

rks<br />

1 2 3 4 5 6 7<br />

141


8/23/2011<br />

43B certain deductions On Actual Payment Basis<br />

Notwithstanding anything contained in any other<br />

provisions <strong>of</strong> the Income Tax Act, a deduction<br />

otherwise allowable under the act in respect <strong>of</strong> –<br />

a. any tax, duty, cess or fee, by whatever name called,<br />

payable under any law for the time being in force, or<br />

b. employer's contribution to provident fund, gratuity<br />

fund or any other fund for the welfare <strong>of</strong> the<br />

employees, or<br />

c. any bonus or Commission payable to the employees,<br />

or<br />

d. interest payable on any loan or borrowing from any<br />

public financial institution or a state Financial<br />

Corporation or state Industrial Investment<br />

Corporation, or<br />

e. Interest payable on any Loan or ADVANCE from a<br />

scheduled bank, (―Scheduled bank‖ includes a Cooperative<br />

bank).<br />

f. Leave encashment payable to employees.<br />

142


8/23/2011<br />

shall be allowed as deduction only in the previous year<br />

in which such sum is actually paid by him. This is<br />

irrespective <strong>of</strong> the previous year in which the liability to<br />

pay such sum was incurred by the assessee according to<br />

the method <strong>of</strong> accounting employed by him.<br />

Notes:<br />

1. The provisions <strong>of</strong> section 43B shall not apply in relation<br />

to any sum which is actually paid by the assessee on or<br />

before the due date applicable in his case for furnishing<br />

the return <strong>of</strong> income under section 139(1) in respect <strong>of</strong><br />

the previous year in which liability to pay such sum was<br />

incurred by the assessee and the evidence <strong>of</strong> such<br />

payment is furnished along with the return <strong>of</strong> income.<br />

2. CBDT Circular: If under a scheme <strong>of</strong> the State<br />

Government, payment <strong>of</strong> sales tax is deferred for<br />

specified number <strong>of</strong> years, sales tax deferred will be<br />

deemed to have been paid for the purposes <strong>of</strong> section<br />

43B.<br />

3. Where interest payable under clause (d) or (e) is<br />

converted into a loan or advance or borrowing, then<br />

it shall not be deemed to have been actually paid.<br />

143


8/23/2011<br />

Clause 22 (a) Amount <strong>of</strong> Modified Value Added Tax credits availed <strong>of</strong> or utilized<br />

during the previous year its treatment in the pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account treatment <strong>of</strong><br />

outstanding Modified Value Added Tax credits in the accounts.<br />

‣Tax auditor should verify that there is a proper reconciliation between balance <strong>of</strong><br />

CENVAT credit in the accounts and relevant excise records. (Viz. RG-23)<br />

‣Tax auditor should verify that the information furnished under this sub-clause is<br />

compatible with the information under clause 12(b)<br />

‣Reporting in following format<br />

Balance at beginning <strong>of</strong> the year<br />

Add: CENVAT Credit available during the year<br />

Less: CENVAT Credit utilised during the year<br />

Outstanding at the end <strong>of</strong> the year<br />

XXX<br />

XXX<br />

(XXX)<br />

XXX<br />

(b) Particulars <strong>of</strong> income or expenditure <strong>of</strong> prior period credited or debited to the<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss account.<br />

‣ Accounts audited----Annual Accounts<br />

Accounts not audited----Close scrutiny <strong>of</strong> ledger to determine period to which<br />

income/expenditure relates.<br />

‣ Both AS 5 and AS(IT)-II notified by Govt under section 145 state that if the<br />

material adjustments arising due to error or ommission in earlier years, then prior<br />

period item.<br />

‣ There is difference between expenditure <strong>of</strong> any earlier year debited to the pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

and loss account and the expenditure relating to any earlier year, which has<br />

crystallised during the relevant previous year<br />

‣ Material adjustments necessitated by circumstances which though related to<br />

previous periods but determined in the current period, will not be considered as<br />

prior period items.<br />

144


8/23/2011<br />

Clause 23. Details <strong>of</strong> any amount borrowed on hundi or any amount due<br />

thereon (including interest on the amount borrowed) repaid, otherwise than<br />

through an account payee cheque [Section 69D]:-<br />

Statute: As per Sec 69 D, the amount so borrowed or repaid shall be deemed<br />

to be the income <strong>of</strong> the person borrowing or repaying the amount aforesaid<br />

for the previous year in which the amount was borrowed or repaid<br />

Hundi---Promissory Note.<br />

Audit Procedures:<br />

‣The Tax auditor to obtain a complete list <strong>of</strong> borrowings and repayments <strong>of</strong><br />

hundi loans otherwise than by account payee cheques<br />

‣Verify the same with the books <strong>of</strong> account.<br />

‣Verify records in possession <strong>of</strong> assessee.<br />

‣If records are not available, give appropriate disclaimer to that effect.<br />

‣ Scrutinize cash and petty cash book<br />

Amount borrowed or repaid on hundi.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Where any amount is borrowed on a hundi from, or any amount due<br />

thereon is repaid to, any person otherwise than through an account<br />

payee cheque drawn on a bank, the amount so borrowed or repaid<br />

shall be deemed to be the income <strong>of</strong> the person borrowing or<br />

repaying the amount aforesaid for the previous year in which the<br />

amount was borrowed or repaid, as the case may be :<br />

Provided that, if in any case any amount borrowed on a hundi has<br />

been deemed under the provisions <strong>of</strong> this section to be the income<br />

<strong>of</strong> any person, such person shall not be liable to be assessed again in<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> such amount under the provisions <strong>of</strong> this section on<br />

repayment <strong>of</strong> such amount.<br />

Explanation.—For the purposes <strong>of</strong> this section, the amount repaid<br />

shall include the amount <strong>of</strong> interest paid on the amount borrowed.]<br />

145


8/23/2011<br />

Clause 24 (a) * Particulars <strong>of</strong> each loan or deposit in an amount exceeding the limit<br />

specified in section 269SS taken or accepted during the previous year :—<br />

i. name, address and permanent account number (if available with the assessee) <strong>of</strong><br />

the lender or depositor;<br />

ii.<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> loan or deposit taken or accepted;<br />

iii.<br />

whether the loan or deposit was squared up during the previous year;<br />

iv.<br />

maximum amount outstanding in the account at any time during the previous<br />

year;<br />

v. whether the loan or deposit was taken or accepted otherwise than by an account<br />

payee cheque or an account payee bank draft.<br />

Statute: If loan or deposit to be accepted together alongwith loans or deposits<br />

already accepted, exceeding Rs. 20,000 to be availed only through account<br />

payee cheque or account payee bank draft.<br />

Audit Procedures: The Tax auditor to obtain details <strong>of</strong> all loans or deposits taken<br />

and verify the same with records maintained by the assessee. Where records are<br />

not available auditor to give a disclaimer that necessary evidence is not in<br />

possession <strong>of</strong> assessee.<br />

Other Considerations:<br />

‣ Payments not made through account payee cheques or bank drafts but through<br />

bank transfers like RTGS, NEFT , then tax auditor should give an appropriate<br />

note to that effect.<br />

‣ Sec 269SS applies even when loans are taken free <strong>of</strong> interest.<br />

‣ Deposit also includes current account, security deposit against contracts.<br />

‣ Scrutinize advances account to verify whether advances are in nature <strong>of</strong><br />

deposits.<br />

‣ Sec 269SS shall not apply when loans are accepted by Government, Banking<br />

Company, Govt. Co. or Co. established under Central, State, Provincial Act.<br />

146


8/23/2011<br />

Section 269SS provides that any loan or deposit shall not<br />

be taken or accepted from any other person otherwise<br />

than by an account payee cheque or account payee bank<br />

draft if,<br />

(a) the amount <strong>of</strong> such loan or deposit or the<br />

aggregate amount <strong>of</strong> such loan and deposit ; or<br />

(b) on the date <strong>of</strong> taking or accepting such loan<br />

or deposit, any loan or deposit taken or accepted<br />

earlier by such person from the depositor is<br />

remaining unpaid and the amount or the aggregate<br />

amount remaining unpaid ; or<br />

(c) the amount or the aggregate amount referred to<br />

in clause (a) together with the amount or the<br />

aggregate amount referred to in clause (b), is twenty<br />

thousand rupees or more :<br />

147


8/23/2011<br />

Thus it is clear that no person can accept any loan<br />

or deposit <strong>of</strong> Rs 20000 or more otherwise than by<br />

way <strong>of</strong> an account payee cheque or an account payee<br />

draft.<br />

The limit <strong>of</strong> Rs 20000 will also apply to a case even if<br />

on the date <strong>of</strong> taking or accepting such loan<br />

or deposit, any loan or deposit taken or accepted<br />

earlier by such person from such depositor is<br />

remaining unpaid and such unpaid amount along with<br />

the loan or deposit to be accepted, exceeds the<br />

aforesaid limit.<br />

This can be explained with an example: If Mr. X has<br />

a credit balance <strong>of</strong> a loan <strong>of</strong> Rs 19000 from Mr. Y. Now in<br />

this case Mr. X cannot take loan in excess <strong>of</strong> Rs 999 more<br />

from Mr. Y except with an account payee cheque<br />

or account payee bank Draft.<br />

148


8/23/2011<br />

Exemptions from section 269SS: The Following persons<br />

are exempted from the purview <strong>of</strong> section 269SS:<br />

(a) Government ;<br />

(b) any banking company, post <strong>of</strong>fice savings bank or cooperative<br />

bank ;<br />

(c) any corporation established by a Central, State or<br />

Provincial Act ;<br />

(d) any Government company as defined in section 617 <strong>of</strong><br />

the Companies Act, 1956<br />

(e) other notified insititutions<br />

(f) where the depositor and the acceptor are both having<br />

agricultural income and neither <strong>of</strong> them have any taxable<br />

income.<br />

Consequences <strong>of</strong> contravention <strong>of</strong> section 269SS:<br />

Section 271D <strong>of</strong> Income Tax Act 1961 provides that if<br />

a loan or deposit is accepted in contravention <strong>of</strong><br />

the provisions <strong>of</strong> section 269SS then a penalty equivalent<br />

to the amount <strong>of</strong> such loan or deposit may be levied by<br />

the Joint commissioner.<br />

149


8/23/2011<br />

Clause 24 (b) * Particulars <strong>of</strong> each repayment <strong>of</strong> loan or deposit in an<br />

amount exceeding the limit specified in section 269T made during the<br />

previous year :—<br />

(i) name, address and permanent account number (if available with the<br />

assessee) <strong>of</strong> the payee;<br />

(ii) amount <strong>of</strong> repayment;<br />

(iii) maximum amount outstanding in the account at any time during the<br />

previous year;<br />

(iv) whether the repayment was made otherwise than by account payee<br />

cheque or account payee bank draft.<br />

Statute: Sec 269T is attracted when repayment <strong>of</strong> loan or deposit is made to<br />

a person<br />

When aggregate amount <strong>of</strong> loans or deposits held by such person on date <strong>of</strong><br />

repayment exceeds Rs. 20000<br />

Even though repayment amount may be less than Rs. 20000<br />

Note:<br />

‣ Loans or deposits may be held singly or jointly with some other person.<br />

‣ Repayment includes interest thereon<br />

‣ Only for company assessee, loans or deposits include loans repayable on<br />

notice and after a particular period and not on demand.<br />

Audit Procedures: The Tax auditor to obtain details <strong>of</strong> all loans or deposits<br />

repaid and verify the same with records maintained by the assessee.<br />

Where records are not available auditor to give a disclaimer<br />

150


8/23/2011<br />

Section 269T<br />

Section 269T <strong>of</strong> Income Tax Act provides that any branch<br />

<strong>of</strong> a banking company or a co operative society, firm or<br />

other person shall not repay any loan or deposit<br />

otherwise than by an account payee cheque<br />

or account payee bank draft drawn in the name <strong>of</strong><br />

the person, who has made the loan or deposit, if<br />

(1) The amount <strong>of</strong> the loan or deposit together with<br />

interest is Rs 20000 or more, or<br />

(2) The aggregate amount <strong>of</strong> loans or deposits held by<br />

such person, either in his own name or jointly with other<br />

person on the date <strong>of</strong> such repayment together with<br />

interest, is Rs 20000 or more.<br />

For example if X is having loan <strong>of</strong> Rs 30000 outstanding to<br />

Y. Then X cannot repay such loan in cash to Y.<br />

151


8/23/2011<br />

Exemptions from Section 269T:<br />

The Following persons are exempted from the<br />

purview <strong>of</strong> section 269T:<br />

(a) Government ;<br />

(b) any banking company, post <strong>of</strong>fice savings bank or cooperative<br />

bank ;<br />

(c) any corporation established by a Central, State or<br />

Provincial Act ;<br />

(d) any Government company as defined in section 617 <strong>of</strong><br />

the Companies Act, 1956<br />

(e) other notified insititutions<br />

Consequenses <strong>of</strong> contravention <strong>of</strong><br />

section 269T:<br />

Section 271E <strong>of</strong> Income Tax Act 1961 provides that if<br />

a loan or deposit is repaid in contravention <strong>of</strong><br />

the provisions <strong>of</strong> section 269T then a penalty equivalent<br />

to the amount <strong>of</strong> such loan or deposit repaid may be<br />

levied by the Joint commissioner.<br />

152


8/23/2011<br />

Clause 24.(c) Whether a certificate has been obtained from the<br />

assessee regarding taking or accepting loan or deposit, or repayment<br />

<strong>of</strong> the same through an account payee cheque or an account payee<br />

bank draft. [Yes/No]<br />

The particulars (i) to (iv) at (b) and the Certificate at (c) above need<br />

not be given in the case <strong>of</strong> a repayment <strong>of</strong> any loan or deposit taken<br />

or accepted from Government, Government company, banking<br />

company or a corporation established by a Central, State or<br />

Provincial Act.<br />

Clause 25. (a) Details <strong>of</strong> brought forward loss or depreciation<br />

allowance, in the following manner, to the extent available :<br />

Audit Procedures: The Tax auditor to study the assessment records<br />

i.e. income tax returns filed, assessment orders, appellate orders and<br />

rectification / revisied orders and trace the amounts <strong>of</strong> loss /<br />

allowance from the income tax returns and the assessment orders.<br />

153


8/23/2011<br />

Clause 25 (b) whether a change in shareholding <strong>of</strong> the company has taken place in<br />

the previous year due to which the losses incurred prior to the previous year<br />

cannot be allowed to be carried forward in terms <strong>of</strong> section 79<br />

Statute: Notwithstanding anything contained in Chapter, where a change in<br />

shareholding has taken place in a previous year in the case <strong>of</strong> a company, not<br />

being a company in which the public are substantially interested, no loss incurred<br />

in any year prior to the previous year shall be carried forward and set <strong>of</strong>f against<br />

the income <strong>of</strong> the previous year unless<br />

(a) on the last day <strong>of</strong> the previous year the shares <strong>of</strong> the company carrying not less<br />

than fifty-one per cent <strong>of</strong> the voting power were beneficially held by persons who<br />

beneficially held shares <strong>of</strong> the company carrying not less than fifty-one per cent<br />

<strong>of</strong> the voting power on the last day <strong>of</strong> the year or years in which the loss was<br />

incurred<br />

Audit Procedures: The Tax Auditor to enquire with the management and review<br />

statutory records <strong>of</strong> the entity to ascertain whether there is a change in<br />

shareholding <strong>of</strong> the company and report accordingly<br />

Clause 25(b) - Change in shareholding <strong>of</strong> the company and carry<br />

forward <strong>of</strong> the losses u/s 79 <strong>of</strong> the Act.<br />

Business loss cannot be carried forward and set <strong>of</strong>f in the<br />

previous year in which a change in shareholding takes place<br />

in case <strong>of</strong> a company in which public are not substantially<br />

interested , if on the last day <strong>of</strong> the previous year in which<br />

the change in shareholding took place and on the last day <strong>of</strong><br />

the previous year in which the loss was incurred, the shares<br />

<strong>of</strong> the company carrying not less than 51% <strong>of</strong> the voting<br />

power were not beneficially held by the same persons.<br />

154


8/23/2011<br />

Clause 26. Section-wise details <strong>of</strong> deductions, if any,<br />

admissible under Chapter VIA.<br />

Audit Procedures: Tax Auditor to perform corroborative<br />

inquiry with the entity to ascertain if there are any Deductions<br />

i. In respect <strong>of</strong> certain Payments<br />

ii. In respect <strong>of</strong> certain Incomes<br />

iii. Others<br />

Tax auditor to scrutinize books <strong>of</strong> account and other documents<br />

for ascertaining value <strong>of</strong> deductions under Chapter VIA<br />

Clause 27. (a) Whether the assessee has complied with the provisions <strong>of</strong><br />

Chapter XVII-B regarding deduction <strong>of</strong> tax at source and regarding the<br />

payment there<strong>of</strong> to the credit <strong>of</strong> the Central Government. [Yes/No]<br />

The newly inserted clause 27 is different from the earlier clause.<br />

In the earlier clause the requirement was with reference to the<br />

tax deducted at source but not paid to the credit <strong>of</strong> the Central<br />

Government in accordance with the provisions <strong>of</strong> Chapter XVII-<br />

B. The new clause requires reporting on the compliance with the<br />

provisions <strong>of</strong> Chapter XVII-B regarding deduction <strong>of</strong> tax at<br />

source and payment there<strong>of</strong> to the credit <strong>of</strong> the Central<br />

Government. Thus, the scope <strong>of</strong> reporting under the new clause<br />

is much wider.<br />

This reporting requirement is to be read with the specific non<br />

compliances stated under clause (b).<br />

155


8/23/2011<br />

If the provisions <strong>of</strong> Chapter XVII-B<br />

have not been complied with, give<br />

the following details, namely:<br />

(i)<br />

(ii)<br />

Tax deductible and not deducted at<br />

all<br />

Shortfall on account <strong>of</strong> lesser<br />

deduction than required to be<br />

deducted<br />

Amount<br />

…………<br />

…………<br />

(iii) Tax deducted late …………<br />

(iv)<br />

Tax deducted but not paid to the<br />

credit<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Central Government<br />

…………<br />

Audit Procedures: Tax Auditor to test the controls instilled by the entity for<br />

appropriate deduction <strong>of</strong> tax a source. Tax auditor also to obtain and verify details<br />

<strong>of</strong> payment <strong>of</strong> TDS deducted, for timely payment, with TDS returns<br />

Clause 28(a) In the case <strong>of</strong> a trading concern, give quantitative<br />

details <strong>of</strong> principal items <strong>of</strong> goods traded:<br />

i. opening stock;<br />

ii.<br />

purchases during the previous year;<br />

iii.<br />

iv.<br />

sales during the previous year;<br />

closing stock;<br />

v. shortage/excess, if any.<br />

156


8/23/2011<br />

Clause 28(b) In the case <strong>of</strong> a manufacturing concern, give<br />

quantitative details <strong>of</strong> the principal items <strong>of</strong> raw materials,<br />

finished products and by-products :<br />

A. Raw materials :<br />

i. opening stock;<br />

ii. purchases during the previous year;<br />

iii. consumption during the previous year;<br />

iv. sales during the previous year;<br />

v. closing stock;<br />

vi. yield <strong>of</strong> finished products;<br />

vii. percentage <strong>of</strong> yield;<br />

viii. shortage/excess, if any.<br />

Clause 28(b) In the case <strong>of</strong> a manufacturing concern, give<br />

quantitative details <strong>of</strong> the principal items <strong>of</strong> raw materials,<br />

finished products and by-products :<br />

B. Finished products/By-products :<br />

i. opening stock;<br />

ii. purchases during the previous year;<br />

iii. quantity manufactured during the previous year;<br />

iv. sales during the previous year;<br />

v. closing stock;<br />

vi. shortage/excess, if any.<br />

*Information may be given to the extent available.<br />

157


8/23/2011<br />

Audit Procedures:<br />

Tax Auditor to obtain certificates from the assessee in respect <strong>of</strong><br />

principal items <strong>of</strong> goods traded, manufactured ( raw materials,<br />

finished goods and by-products).<br />

Auditor to verify the figures reported on a sample basis, in order<br />

to satisfy himself <strong>of</strong> the as to the correctness <strong>of</strong> the figures<br />

furnished<br />

Issues on Clause – 28<br />

“Principal Items:-Items constitute more than 10% <strong>of</strong><br />

the aggregate value<strong>of</strong> purchase, consumption or<br />

turnover.<br />

Report only Principal Itemsunder this clause<br />

Clause (a) –Applicable on Trading concern.<br />

Clause (b) –Applicable on Manufacturing concern.<br />

The Information about (vi),(vii) & (viii) <strong>of</strong> sub clause A <strong>of</strong><br />

(b), to the extent <strong>of</strong> availability <strong>of</strong> information in the<br />

record.<br />

158


8/23/2011<br />

Where stock audit has been undertaken, certified<br />

documents would be required both as regards stock as<br />

well as shortages.<br />

Clause 29. In the case <strong>of</strong> a domestic company, details <strong>of</strong> tax on<br />

distributed pr<strong>of</strong>its under section 115-O in the following form :—<br />

a) total amount <strong>of</strong> distributed pr<strong>of</strong>its;<br />

b) total tax paid thereon;<br />

c) dates <strong>of</strong> payment with amounts<br />

Audit Procedures:<br />

Tax Auditor to verify the statutory records / minutes to ascertain the<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>its distributed. Auditor to verify the tax paid thereon and<br />

the date <strong>of</strong> payment, on the basis <strong>of</strong> duly received challan and books <strong>of</strong><br />

account.<br />

Note: Dividend Distribution Tax to be paid @ 16.61%within 14 days <strong>of</strong><br />

declaration/distribution or payment whichever is earlier.<br />

159


8/23/2011<br />

Issues on Clause - 29<br />

Sec 115-O Tax on distributed pr<strong>of</strong>its <strong>of</strong> Domestic<br />

Companies. The special levy at the prescribed rate, on the<br />

amt <strong>of</strong> dividend declared, distributed or paid (interim or<br />

other wise) out <strong>of</strong> current Pr<strong>of</strong>its or accumulated Pr<strong>of</strong>its.<br />

This tax shall be payable even if no Income tax is payable<br />

by such Company on its total Income.<br />

“Dividend”means dividend under clause (22) <strong>of</strong> Sec 2<br />

exclusive <strong>of</strong> sub clause (e) advance or loan out <strong>of</strong><br />

accumulated pr<strong>of</strong>it or shareholders etc.<br />

The Date <strong>of</strong> Payment should be verified from the<br />

Challans and Books <strong>of</strong> A/cs etc.<br />

Tax u/s 115-O should be deposited within 15 days <strong>of</strong> date<br />

<strong>of</strong> declaration/ distribution or payment which ever is<br />

earlier.<br />

The tax rate on dividend distributed u/s 115-O is 15%.<br />

The tax auditor need not go into the computation <strong>of</strong><br />

distributed pr<strong>of</strong>its but to report the amount actually<br />

distributed.<br />

160


8/23/2011<br />

30. 30.) Whether any cost audit was carried out, if yes, enclose a copy <strong>of</strong><br />

the report <strong>of</strong> such audit [See section 139(9)]<br />

31. Whether any audit was conducted under the Central Excise Act,1944,<br />

if yes, enclose a copy <strong>of</strong> the report <strong>of</strong> such audit.<br />

Audit Procedures:<br />

The tax auditor to ascertain from the management whether an audit<br />

was carried out and if yes enclose a copy <strong>of</strong> the report <strong>of</strong> such audit.<br />

Where an audit may have been ordered and is not completed by the<br />

time the tax auditor gives his report, he has to state the same in his<br />

report.<br />

Issues on Clause - 30<br />

Enclose the copy <strong>of</strong> Cost Audit Report under Sec 233B <strong>of</strong><br />

the companies Act 1956 (if conducted such Audit).<br />

The Auditor need not express any opinion if such Audit is<br />

ordered and not conducted.<br />

The Auditor state the fact if such Audit is not completed<br />

by the time <strong>of</strong> his Audit Report.<br />

Make note <strong>of</strong> any material observation made in such<br />

Report.<br />

Give information only for that Cost Audit Report which<br />

falls within the relevant Previous Year.<br />

161


8/23/2011<br />

Issues on Clause - 31<br />

Attached the Audit report <strong>of</strong> Audit conducted under<br />

Central Excise Act, 1944 (if any).<br />

The auditor should make note <strong>of</strong> any material<br />

observation made in such report.<br />

If such audit is not completed by the time <strong>of</strong> his audit<br />

report –mention the fact.<br />

Enclose the copy <strong>of</strong> such report <strong>of</strong> Latest Year.<br />

If Excise Audit Report is not enclosed, the return cannot<br />

be considered as defective return under Sec 139(9).<br />

32.) Accounting ratios with calculations as follows :—<br />

a) Gross pr<strong>of</strong>it/Turnover;<br />

b) Net pr<strong>of</strong>it/Turnover;<br />

c) Stock-in-trade/Turnover;<br />

d) Material consumed/Finished goods produced.<br />

Audit Procedures:<br />

The Tax auditor to verify the ratios. The tax auditor should assign<br />

meaning to the terms used in the above ratios having due regard to<br />

the generally accepted accounting principles. Ratios mentioned in<br />

this clause are to be calculated in terms <strong>of</strong> value only.<br />

162


8/23/2011<br />

Issues on Clause -32<br />

Calculate ratios for manufacturing or trading concern in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> value only.<br />

Calculate Ratios for the business as a whole and not<br />

product wise.<br />

If Closing stock is Nil, this sub clause (c) is not applicable.<br />

Stock -in –trade include only closing stock <strong>of</strong> finished<br />

goods not stock <strong>of</strong> raw material & work –in –progress.<br />

Overall G.P Ratio is enough if gross pr<strong>of</strong>it from each<br />

product is different.<br />

Depreciation on Plant & Machinery considered for<br />

valuation <strong>of</strong> Finished goods [AS-2 (revised)]<br />

Depreciation on P&M should be deduct to arrive at gross<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>it.<br />

Exclude extraordinary items for calculation <strong>of</strong> ratios<br />

unless give material effect [AS 5, AS(IT) II].<br />

163


8/23/2011<br />

Take the value <strong>of</strong> Sales, Purchase & Inventories before the<br />

Statutory Adjustment (<strong>of</strong> Sec 145A).<br />

In case <strong>of</strong> Share broker<br />

i) Dealing for Commission – Calculate Net Pr<strong>of</strong>it Ratio<br />

ii)Doing Business – Calculate Gross Pr<strong>of</strong>it Ratio<br />

Case Law<br />

N.C. Budharaja & Co, (1993) 204 ITR 412(SC)<br />

In this Case Hon‘ble Supreme Court decided that<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> tunnels, bridges, dams etc is only a<br />

Service activity and it cannot amount to manufacturing<br />

activity.<br />

U/s 271B, if a person fails to get his accounts audited as required<br />

under section 44AB or to furnish the report <strong>of</strong> such audit, then:<br />

The Penalty imposed shall be, lower <strong>of</strong><br />

½ % <strong>of</strong> sales or gross receipts<br />

Rs 1,50,000/-<br />

NO PENALTY IS IMPOSABLE U/S 271B, IF THE<br />

ASSESSEE PROVES THAT THERE WAS A REASONABLE<br />

CAUSE FOR THE FAILURE..<br />

164


8/23/2011<br />

“Reasonable cause"<br />

<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> the instances where Tribunals/Courts have accepted<br />

as "reasonable cause" are as follows :<br />

a) Resignation <strong>of</strong> the tax auditor and consequent delay<br />

b) Bona fide interpretation <strong>of</strong> the term `turnover' based on expert<br />

advice<br />

c) Death or physical inability <strong>of</strong> the partner in charge <strong>of</strong> the<br />

accounts<br />

d) Labour problems such as strike, lock out for a long period, etc.<br />

e) Loss <strong>of</strong> accounts because <strong>of</strong> fire, theft, etc. beyond the control<br />

<strong>of</strong> the assessee<br />

f) Non-availability <strong>of</strong> accounts on account <strong>of</strong> seizure<br />

g) Natural calamities, commotion, etc.<br />

Penalty u/s 277A<br />

Falsification <strong>of</strong> book <strong>of</strong> accounts or documents etc.<br />

A person shall be Punishable with rigorous imprisonment ,<br />

which may extend from 3 months to 3 years and shall be<br />

liable to fine if following conditions are satisfied:<br />

‣ he willfully and with intent to enable any other person<br />

(assessee) to evade any tax or interest or penalty chargeable<br />

and impossible under Income Tax Act<br />

‣ he makes or causes to be made, any entry or statement in<br />

any books or other documents relevant for any proceedings<br />

under the Act which is false.<br />

‣ he knows it to be false or does not believe it to be true.<br />

No such other prosecution shall be launched by any income<br />

tax authority without prior permission <strong>of</strong> the CIT <strong>of</strong><br />

Appropriate authority.<br />

330<br />

165


8/23/2011<br />

Conclusion<br />

Action on incomplete audit reports<br />

1. Incomplete Information/Non Commitable replies<br />

‣ Report by AO to Commissioner <strong>of</strong> IT<br />

2. If pr<strong>of</strong>essional negligence is reflected<br />

‣ Initiation <strong>of</strong> Disciplinary proceedings<br />

(with the approval <strong>of</strong> CCIT)<br />

331<br />

166

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!