parker-v-goldhagen-edpa-15-cv-3304

&
L
t
k'
} W ffifi ; IN THE UNITED STATES C'URT
ro*rnn EASTERN DISTRTcT oF pEr{NSyvLANTA
GORDON ROY PARr(ER'
alWa"Piay Gordon,"
4247 Locust Street, #119
Philadelphia, PA 19104
(267)298-t2s7
SnodgrassPublish@aol. com,
Plaintiff, caseNo: I5 3304
v.
JACQUELINE FAYE GOLDHAGEN,
a[Wa"hcqui Holland"
10524 West Pico Boulevard,#216
Los Angeles, CA 90064,
Complaint for Declaratory Relief,
Fraudulent Misrepresentation,
Breach of Contract, and
Defamation
Defendant
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF"
FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION"
BREACH OF' CONTRACT, AND DEFAMATION
Plaintiff Gordon Roy Parker ("Plaintiff'), in the above-styled action, based upon
information and belief, sets forth and avers the following:
THE PARTIES
1. Plaintiff Gordon Roy Parker, alWa "Ray Gordon," is an adult male domiciled and
residing in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, who may be served at the address listed for him
in the caption. Plaintiff is the owner and operator of Snodgrass Publishing Group, a
Pennsylvania Sole Proprietor and Internet media company, whose primary website is
toosmarltofail.com.

2. Defendant Jacqueline Faye Goldhagen, aNa Jacqui Holland ("Defendant"), is an
adult female domiciled and residing in Los Angeles, California. She is a "rising star" actress
known for cutting-edge and extremely sexy PG-13 work (e.g., Bikini Avengers, Hollywood Sex
ll/ars, Lde As A Hot Loser, etc.), and a hypnotist/life coach, who may be served at the address
listed for her in the caption. Her current website is http://www.newagehypnotist.com.
NATURE OF ACTION
3. Many years ago, this court branded Plaintiff a serial litigant, though he would assert
that time has validated his arguments. With two cataracts, Stage III COPD, two gallstones, high
blood-sugar, and numerous other medical concerns, Plaintiff has far better things to do than to
"throw down" in Federal court. Nevertheless, lb-case exists solely because Defendant
threatened to sue Plaintiff over a negative Yelp! review, using her attorney to amplifu the threat.
Plaintiffs review of the underlying facts, and subsequent events, have given rise to this action.
4. This action stems from the breach of a contract, atlveat of litigation by Defendant
over Plaintiffs negative review of her practice, and alleged defamation of Plaintiff by Defendant
in response to said negative review. All attempts at mitigation and settlement have failed.
STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION AND VENUE
5. Personal jurisdiction in Pennsylvania is conferred by Defendant's threat to sue
Plaintiff as the defamation suit would have to occur in this jurisdiction.
6. Subject-mafter jurisdiction is conferred by diversity jurisdiction and the amount in
controversy, both in the Complaint and in the threatened defamation claim.
7. Supplemental jurisdiction is conferred over all other claims.
8. Venue is proper because Plaintiff resides within the Eastem District Of Pennsylvania.
2

BACKGROUND
9. Plaintiff incorporates by reference, as if fully stated verbatim herein, the entire
contents of all previous paragraphs, and all exhibits to this Complaint.
"Bg!4g@i"
10. On June 4,2015, after viewing an impressive (and very sexy) display of hypnotic
talent from Defendant, in a "past-life regression" video on YouTube, Plaintiff began exploring
the possibility of hiring Defendant to make for him a customized hypnosis video, hopefully the
first of at least two, to help improve Plaintiffs eyesight by dilating his pupils, with the second to
help him improve at chess by linking winning at chess to the reward-center response created by
desire for the attractive female hypnotist.
11. Initially, the eyesight video, in which a sexy female hypnotist uses her beauty and
powerful hypnosis technique of the kind possessed by Defendant (and few others, let alone sexy
female others), was Plaintiffs top priority, due to its (relatively) tame content, and commercial
potential. Plaintiff, a successful and profitable producer of hypnosis recordings in his own right
(Anonymistress, Hellen I/I\ Megasleep), had hoped to produce the "eye video" to launch his
Pstient Empowerment Network Of New Yorfr (PENNY), via the website
http://www.patientempowerment.net, which is currently under construction. Penny Parker is
Plaintiffs late mother. With a strong alternative-medicine presence fueling the portal, Defendant
was even more of a perfect fit for the gig.
12. The eye video seemed directly up Defendant's alley, given her willingness to be sexy
on camera, especially for a greater purpose (eyesight), her extreme level of training and polish
generally common only to working performing artists, her three years of experience as a stage
hypnotist, her active hypnosis practice, and that she and her eyes were desirable enough to
3

induce pupil dilation, the goal of the video. Hypnotherapy videos with similar content from
similar talent can easily gross tens of thousands of dollars, more than enough to launch PENNY,
which Plaintiff hopes to one day establish as an empowered-patient portal connecting likeminded
practitioners and patients. The primary barrier to producing such videos is finding talent,
which is why they sell so well.
13. Had the eye video been made successfully, at first for Plaintiffs personal use, Plaintiff
intended to offer Defendant the "number two" role in PENNY, as its spokesmodel and primary
hypnotist, with revenue from the eye video serving as a form of charter contribution (of
Plaintiffs half of the revenue). Her royalty from the eye video would have been 50 percent of
gross profit, while the "charter spokesmodel" gig included five percent ownership of the portal.
For perspective, the painter of Facebook's in-house mural was paid in stock which wound up
worth over $200 million, far more than the value of the actual painting.
14. The eye video was never proposed to Defendant, because Plaintiff soon discovered
that Defendant offered customfetish videos (hypnosis is a known sexual fetish) via the Castoms
Club website (http://www.customs4u.com), to an audience which includes men who, like
Plaintiff, enjoy being hypnotized by beautiful women:

http ://www. customvideosclub. com/customsclub/j acqui -holl and/
Retrieved on June 8,2015 at9'.07 ant
15. Plaintiff was hardly shocked (though delighted) to learn that Defendant had
(apparently) embraced the sexy, cutting-edge side of hypnosis, as her YouTube video had also
indicated. He immediately sought, and found, confirmation that this ad was genuine, via
Defendant's own Twitter account:

Eff[:',m]r*
r@
I sell #customvideo$ @f;u$toms4u! 0rder
yours TODAY at
cu$t0ms4u . c0m/cust0rns/pnwer-. . . !
#customclips #clips #fetish
{ltl*d...r
htrps://twitterrco#:i;:,;|;lily;11,-Ti;ff
A:rrese*te2,
16. Plaintiff has long expected Hollywood and the hypnofetish to finally collide, having
waiting patiently for years for someone with Defendant's skillset and experience to materialize,
and had finally found what he was seeking. Having finally found one, he was going to approach
her with great caution, great respect, substantial compensation, and a vision which he hoped she
would share enough to make real and profitable, not much different from other internet
collaboration.
17. Prior to offering her commercial projects, however, Plaintiffs first goal was to secure,
for his own use, a hypnosis induction video, preferably for chess. He therefore avoided creative

conflict at all costs, deferring to Defendant's wishes regarding scripting, content, and the limits of
sexualized expression for the first video.
18. In the absence of the Castoms Club page,Plaintiff would have simply offered
Defendant the eye video, with its g-ruted script, told her he wanted a deep trance with an eyecontact
induction, and suggestions of extreme pupil dilation, a request to which Defendant
certainly would not have objected. Once completed, Plaintiff would then have offered a
minimum of $5,000.00 for the rights to the video, up to a percentage of PENNY in return for the
spokesmodel gig, with the work already having been performed. Based on information, belief,
and the cofllmon-sense of a kindergartener, Plaintiff avers that Defendant would have accepted
the spokesmodel gig.
19. By working through Customs Club,the parties were still primarily contracted to each
other, but also to the third-party website, thus further ensuring the likelihood that Plaintiff would
actually receive the chess video once ordered. Not long after first viewing her YouTube video,
Plaintiff offered Defendant $1,000.00 to make a "sexy hypnosis video for chess improvement,"
with the type of scripting mentioned earlier in this Complaint.
20. As with the eye video, the chess video's market value was such that Plaintiff had
planned to offer Defendant a substantial amount of money for the rights to this video, for his
Chicks Dig Chessplayers campaign, tied to Plaintiffs successful dating-advice books.
21. Defendant accepted Plaintiffs offer, not once, but twice (Plaintiff had submitted a
duplicate by mistake):

SuQYour Gffer r&fas *,lifiEpted
trat6l4l2815 1$:24:12 A-M. Eastem Dayllsht Tirme
Fro@
To:, Bettorsfisin gle@aol -corn
Sslrf frorrt flts lnfpn}Et fsafa#sl
It
Bear Bettoroffsinqfiei@ao!- colll
PEnrcr Girl has accepted yotlr offer! P&ease follow ttre {ink heNoriu to pay
$'lCISS and cornplete tlris srder"
http:/&ffivur.oustomq$u"corfl/pay*for-offe.r{0CI1 1 OQA=
^
w
:YS
;:1* t
;#
,t-df
;",,"^
l.r:S
,@*1
' '11r-.
ffi
r[rqff;
'#w
ffi M
ffi ffi m
Su|r"Yoilrr Oltlier flSas *GcsFtBtl
t!,a[6/4I2O"$5 t0:30:2't A,-M- Eastem Dayngflt Tlme
Frsr"surs}rrr&@cr.rctpryg1$lc-q€inn
T(}: *El,ettorsfFeif,rqfe@eol-oord!
.Se.nt iikolm? ffls ,rrferxle{ fDefeffs}
U
Dea r EEHp rErei[rgle@asL Gt]r!tr
P11urer Girl ha* ascepted your offer! Fbase firlfichfrI the limk belstv to pay
SIOOO and cemp&ete this orden
h-t@;/finruryr.cu.stnmsdu=Eg'trrlpay.fer.qfferfotr}l "t , ..tlA=
ffi
@8,*,,.
qMW ffiW, ffi {1 ffip ffi
22. A binding contract between the parties now existed.

23. To avoid any confusion created by the duplicate offers, Plaintiffimmediately e-mailed
Defendant at the address listed on her Twitter page to clarify that he was paying $1,000.00 for
the chess video, and for her to delete the second offer. Upon written acknowledgement of which
of the two contracts was the valid one, Plaintiff would immediately pay the $1,000.00 to
Customs Club.
24. Defendant responded to Plaintiffs e-mail with a counter-offer of her own:
1:98:55 F-M" Eastern ilayli$h[T.flne
Wsuld ycu be open {oiust dealing with me and paying &rough paypa!. I
hate t*mt site if,e really comfusing I fried to erase it sm numerous
accasions but cou&ln't figure nt"lt hour to do that ei*len @"
I need to ask you a few questiom? Are you audlo, visl,ml or kinmffrefic? tr
don't know that nruch aMq"*t chess can you telt sne urhen you rrrrim holn
.*&
ffi
;#!F:,:,,
{*D -'::;" ilgn.
ffi
mt#
ffi ffi ffi
25. In response, Plaintiff fired Defendant, due to her extreme lack of ethics, telling her
only that she had "flunked an audition [he] wasn't even giving," as there was no need to inform
someone with whom Plaintiff was breaking contact any further regarding why. In the letter,
Plaintiff requested that Defendant never contact him again.

26' The breach also destroyed Boxing Jacquifor Plaintiffs personal use, since he no
longer trusted the hypnotist "inside his head." Plaintiff elected to cut his losses and continue his
search, lest he be falsely accused of pestering Defendant.
27 - Despite the explicit advisory not to contact Plaintiff in this state, Defendant
immediately e-mailed him three consecutive times, with Plaintiff deleting all three mails without
reading, as he had no intention of ever hiring or speaking with Defendant again.
28' At this point, Defendant's e-mails ceased, and Plaintiff "took his case to the people.,,
29. Between his negative experience with Defendant, and her having ,,stalked,,him three
times, Plaintiff decided to don his social-justice warrior(SJw) cape, andpost online reviews of
Defendant, as well as making "protest" posts on her social-media pages, concerning both the
breach of contract, Defendant's marketing as a fetish model, and the annoyance of having to
remove the "hypnotic seal" Plaintiff had allowed to develop in order to make himself more
receptive to Defendant's anticipated video hypnosis. Even without hypnosis, any dispute will
intensifi' emotions temporarily, until cooler heads prevail.
30' on June 6,2015, Plaintiff posted his review of Defendant to yelp!. The fulItext of
the review as it last appeared on June g,2ol5,before Plaintiff voluntarily replaced it pending
adjudication, is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference as if fully stated
verbatim herein.
3 1' Plaintiff avers that there are no false and misleading statements concerning Defendant
in Exhibit A, his Yelp! review of her practice.
32' On June 7,2015, Defendant E-mailed Plaintiff, with a copy to her attomey, Steven J.
Dedina, Esq., a cease-and-desist order, threatening legal action if Plaintiff did not remove all of
his postings concerning Defendant and her practice, including the yetp! review.
10

.:ll:\ir.'-l'li. .
Datfs,1712015 11:37:38 P.M- Eastern Dayl,ght Tame
To : x Bettoroffsin(rle{@aol-com
GG: stevededina(Orne-corn
Sent from the lnternet (Details)
I suggest you take down everything including the yelp
review. I am taking Iegal action- lt is an offense- You
committed slander and libel on my social media pages I
have kept screen shots of everythingry
ix
-l -t
6t!d
[Ef
m
,::::::,-:
',;\
p;l;i
rtu":-.i.1 ..........
i,ilihq !d.r* ilBrii'i
t€...E]::
Date:6/7/2015 1 1 :37:38 P-M- Eastem Daylight Time From:
l@
I am giving yau 12 hours to remove all reviews and posts-
You will be hearing from my lawyer, I have cc'd him in this
email.
Thank you,
Jacqueline Holland
B
?H
@
t_s
ili:!
C.C. Steven Dedina (Attorney)
F0, I d2A fierl
33. Defendant consented to publication on her own social-media pages, and has (or had)
full power to moderate and delete any postings, without involving Plaintiff.
34. At the time of publication, Defendant either knew, or should have known, that the
Yelp! review was not defamatory, and that to threaten litigation over same runs afoul of both
California's anti- SLAPP statute, and Pennsylvania's Dragonetti Act.
35. As mitigation gestures of good faith, and pending the outcome of this litigation, on
June 10, 2015, Plaintiffreplaced the Yelp! review with a five-star review of Defendant's "ability
TL

to put people into hypnosis," while noting he may update the review later. He added a rebuttal to
the Ripoff Report review that the audience should reserve judgment until all facts are revealed at
this trial, and that he would retract and abandon any position ruled unfavorably, in lieu of
deletion, which Ripoff Report does not allow. Defendant was immediately put on notice of this.
This is the new Yelp! (five-star) review of Defendant's induction ability, with the oi,ginal on
free-speech chilled ice wrtil adjudication
$t1*/2015
'All Hypnosis ls Stage Hypnosis"
For ntrhr, I ern going b comment only sn -raoq{^ifs ebality b
puf peple into hypnmis" I rnay updafe both this review
and tfie rating hter as m*re infnffnation becomes dear as it
relates to her pl'acl.ice in gwrmal.
Jacqui F&olland has an amazing tdent for irducirg
hyprmsis" I have persoo*l*y Socrlsad on hor inducilimr video
and can say this furn frsflrand elperiene" l-*ypr*otists who
tefi y6{t that }ro{l wero hypnotiend even if yrau dont{eel
hypmtiaed are usulally oovering for t}*ir weakressee.
t ofren [ile to saybpeopb*rho haveesked me, thatonce
thoy are triy hpnotiesd, tfwy ur{i ktun it. l/lfdh Jacqui.
yottli kns$r- t ray this aa a tifficulf su$eot with fartlr y*ars
uf eryeqeflce, yuho hffitrained hypndists and prudlrcd
slmoe*sfrd hlBnosis reo{rrdings. That I becarne an e{rsy
subject for Jqr*i on e video not a,\rerl interded to
h!rynotias ffiB viesr@r in$cat$s greetns6&,
Orm ceution: JecquFsa ekilled- helned, Flyprmeie
in her hands can be amaziqg, bd a!rc like a wild
anusemeflt park ride- Frepare acmrdingly"
lihfl €:O& am - T:00
TtrE S:OO arn - 7:00
Wei! B:{I0 arn - I:0O
Thu 9:00 arn -
Fri 9:00 arn * I:00
Eiat Closed
$un S:00 *rn * I;S0
Edit bu*lnesE infa
lfiore buslness trnfo
EyAp$oin{rnsnl CInly
Tfi}3 lruslrEss !3 a
LE{IAL BiSC|.&!MER": I raras *nof hypndized into nniting
this revieu-""io Sre hest of rny kncnrledpe-
IIm'iL"-
Erorwe nearby
Reslauma nls, N ightlife-
36. Not content to wait for her day in court, on June 7,2015, Defendant posted a rebuttal
to the Ripoff Report:
L2

File Edit View Favorites Tools Help
@ Ripoff Report I New Age H...
fl**
I
Sotd 4k oraDhrc
--
'*-T* ffi
lsl
Con-Man
Howard Needle
Ooeralinq ln
here a Report About You!? Watch This 3 Minute Video!
ffi REBUTTAL Owner of company
lnternet Troll
AUT}{OR: JacqEeline. {USA}
SUBMITTED: Monday, Juneo8, 2015
A
The man who wrote this review is an intemet troll.
encvclopediadramatica.se/Rav Gordon
#M
Wamane World
of Warcmft
SeryeE Molleo-
UlEg
MottenWow
l4e!E!.@E
@'n
*,***'
-qHm",qXXf REVTEw:
*ffi#ffi
(,
ffi
Greenstar
He attacks attradive hypnotists and tdes to ruin heir careers. I am a legimate board
Respond to this report!
Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this I Also a victim?
report!
I
llhIlLriIIlEIXIEmil-E
RepairYour
Reputation!
http://www.ripoftieport.com/r/New-Age-Hypnotist-Jacqui-Holland/Los-Angeles-California-90064/
New-Age-Hypnotist-Jacqui-Holland-Fetish-Models-Should-Not-Do-Hypnotherapy-Los-Angeles-C a-I234148
-
certified hypnoterapist I am not a fettish hypnotistv
Retrieved on June 9,2015 at 9:50 pm
37. Defendant's statement contains four parts: a) a claim that Plaintiff tries to ruin the
careers of athactive female hypnotists; b) that Defendant is a "board certified hypnotist," c) that
she is not a "fettish" [sic] hypnotist, and d) that the contents of the site to which Defendant
Linked -- the user-created Encyclopedia Dramatica "wiki" style page about Plaintiff -- were
factually kosher, and painted a correct portrait of Plaintiff.
38. At the time of publication, Defendant either knew or should have known that the
statement in37(a) is false. She has confused Plaintiffs opinionated reviews and speech with
deliberate attempts to ruin careers. Prior to her breach, his only intention was to pay her
13

$1,000.00 for an anazinghypnosis video, and perhaps move on to monetizing their
collaborations.
39. Defendant's claim in 37(b) that she is a "board certified hypnotist" runs afoul of
rurmerous California laws governing commerce and medical practice, while her claim in37(c)
that she is not a "fettish hypnotist" [sic] are refuted by photographs in paragraphs 14-15.
Encyclopedia Dramatica (ED)
40. Encyclopedia Dramatica, best described as a Wiki From Hell, andto which
Defendant linked as noted in 37(d), is on a foreign-based server, for all purposes immune from
suit and liability, even for the authors of its user-generated content, who use it as a refuge for
content which would never last on an American server, and which would have them sued
immediately upon publication. Plaintiff became aware that apage devoted to him (the "ED
page") had been created sometime in20l1. Its content has recently changed drastically, and it
was last updated in May, 2015:
Gordon
Roy Ff,tfr{rr, wiro lilres to pretend his narne is Ray Eordsn" is a
year old semi*ell known Usenet kook and youTube user Srat llved
his rnother in Hlest Philadetphia. He is Imown through hundreds
usernatflEs online, and seems to have an issue stiddng uist one
*ltity. Meny of tris olderTwiffer accounts are suspended due to hate
Gordon Roy Parker, who
uses thefake narne Hay
Gordon
Retrieved on June 8, 2015
L4

41. ED is nrn by Lulzsec, a splinter group ftomAnonymous. In late 2011, when Plaintiff
was "following the money," a PayPal donations link was provided to him for the account of
Ryan Cleary, who, at the time, had been ordered off the internet by a British court for various
computer-related crimes.
42. The section of the ED Page entitled "USENET" states the following concerning
Plaintiff:
tlsElflHr
GsdffiE first nntehle a& uns ufien he trarassed e !troman Hemed Tfrhitha Hassell
r/Hmufcgcage"s0rnfgrsuplelttrypnoei$lrn*11945firo8w03007c) into movin$ in urder to
hlm SMsn kas atrx heen lfifiwn k tryto snlidt underaS $ymnasE to ffinvinffi them to
ffidrthffi He aho pmhfanfictfmt r*rrolvee eround himsefftorturin$ repinf; and killin$
Srana# slHf#Ssupn 654[s.ffi m/&up/altserstories/n@e17addtta3645ffi8e) .
hmme hh favorite goup s00n afrer he dismrcred tt, and hls life rel/olved around
s#rsinearfrer
thelerm did wt*, ffnrdnn qlnskry prmlaimed thd fftere wffi n0 si$iflcant los$ of life in
kurers- Gildnn qul@ tof,lr step h rernoue the psts frorn the Goo$e Group arfiiue, but
rre syed trranla tc seueml pef,ple repffiting them all ouer the rseneE
43. Defendant's chosen source, a website which claims that the Jews did WTC, contains a
link to a USENET posting in alt.sex.stories,which the ED page claims was authored by Plaintiff,
and which is"fanJic that resolves around himself torturing, raping and killing young
gymnasts." The link to theftrst part of thestory is in Google's USENET archive at
http://groups.google.com/group.alt.sex.stories lmsglel7add4a3645c68e. That story states, in part,
verbatim (with headers truncated):
From: Iown...@hotmail.com
Subject: Ray Gordon vs. The Magnificent Seven
Date: 1998/09/18
Message-ID:
15

Newsgroups : alt.sex.stories
Ray Gordon vs. The Magnificent Seven
My name is Ray Gordon. I'm a mercenary, a soldier of fortune, a hired gun, a bounty hunter, only I
don't fight wars or catch crooks. My work is .. shall we say .. a little more specialized. People pay me
to stalk, tenorize, torture, rape and sometimes ..yes .. even snuffbeautiful young starlet cunts. In
other words, I'm a pussy hunter, a cunt commando, if you will. I love my work, and I ask no
questions. Someone wants me to stalk, rape and snuff some stuck-up starlet cunt, that's their business.
As long as they pay the bills and the veal is fresh, that's all I care about.
That's why I don't bat an eyelash when the limo pulls up to Divers Bar & Gnll,my favorite hangout,
and some chink in a suit and tie steps out. I'd gotten a page an hour before, made the call, and
arranged the meeting. When the chink walks in the door, I can tell he's a spook. He spots me right
away and gestures at me with his finger. I smirk, get up, and follow him out the door.
The limo door opens and the chink slides in. I scan the area for trouble, see nothing, and follow
suit. A fat, smelly, chink in a sweaty uniform is sprawled out along the back seat. He is eating an ice
cream sundae, and strawberry sauce is smeared over his mouth like bad lipstick, making him look a
little queer. The chink in the suit gives me another finger wag, and I decide to commit myself by
taking a seat. As soon as I'm completely inside, the chink slams the door behind me, and the limo
speeds off.
"You were recommended to me," the fat chink in the uniform lisps. "My people tell me you ..do
things for people .. for a price."
"Your people were right," I counter. "The price depends on thejob. High profile, high overhead. I
don't take any jobs where I can't come away clean. That kind of security takes money. I'm a pro .. the
best in the business .. and I only work with pros."
"I assure you, Mr. Gordon," the chink in the suit finally speaks, only it's more like a sneer. "We are
professional ... thoroughly professional. You, on the other hand, don't appear to be any more than a
beer-swilling ... how do you Americans say it ..? loser ..."
"Appearances can be deceiving, Charlie," I return his gaze with some ice of my o!vn. ,,perhaps
you'd like to pull over and see how much of a loser I am."
"That won't be necessary, Mr. Gordon," the fat chink in the ruriform intemrpts. "My sources
are impeccable. They tell me you're the man we need for this operation, and that .. as they say .. is
that."
The chink in the suit tums away from me and stares out the tinted windows.
"So, tell me about this operation ..?" I tum to the fat chink. "Just who the fuck are you guys?
Vietnamese? Korean?"
"Chinese," the fat man doesn't look pleased.
"I am General Chow-Fat of the People's Republic of China. This man is an agent of my govemment's
intelligence organization. We call him Dragoncock."
"Cute ..." I almost laugh.
"I assure you, Mr. Gordon," the general was trying to sound threatening. "Mr. Dragoncock is anything
but cute."
"So what do you want with me?' I ask, tiring of the game. "You obviously want me to bag some
cunt for you, so why don't we just cut to the chase."
1.6

The general smiles and hands me an envelope. There's a photo inside, a photo that almost makes my
jaw hit the floor. Almost ...
"That's the US Women's Gymnastics team,,, I try not to sound apprehensive.
"I believe your press has dubbed them the Magnificent Seven," chow Fat licks his lips
as he speaks. "They are due to appear at the olympic Games in Atlanta in two days. we
believe they will defeat our glorious team. They cannot be allowed to do so. Am i making
myself clear?"
"You want me to nab these cunts so they don't show up your slanty-eyed gook girls
at the big Games," I laugh, "That's a new low, even for me."
"You won't do the job, then?" Chow Fat seemed puzzled. ..I was told you ...,,
"I didn't say that, Fat Man," I cut him off
"Perhaps, Mr. Gordon knows when ajob is beyond his abilities," Dragoncock spoke softly.
"Ttrere ain't no cunt bagging job beyond my abilities, Snailcock," I glared at him. ..I,m just
trying to figure out the angle here. So, you guys need to win. I can respect that. so why
not just snip their brake cables or something. why do you need me? I'm a cunt hunter; i
don't fix sporting events. The mob takes care of that kind of shit.,,
"Just eliminating the girls is not enough, Mr. Gordon,,, Chow Fat lisped. ,,They are an
affront to our way of life. They are admired as capitalistic idols while our girli cower in
their shadow. Death is not .. suitable. It is not enough. They must be shamed, broken,
defiled, rendered inhuman. They must have every bit of their dignity stripped away before
the world's eyes. They will be the butt of every bathroom joke in the world. Theywill
be so shamed, they will wish to die. Our ideals will prevail, and our girls will be ihe darlings
of the world ..."
"I'm beginning to get the picture," I cut him off. ..This isn't aboutjust winning the
Olympics. This runs deeper, more political."
"It is not political, Mr. Gordon," chow Fat wheezed. "It is a matter of survival. Since
the accursed Russians and their allies have fallen, we are the last bastion of Truth in the
world. we will not be denied our glory by seven young teenage cuntso as you call
them." He paused. "So will you take the job?"
I paused. I had to hand it to Fatty. He krew how to pitch. I could just see myself choke fucking one
of the little cunts, jamming my cock dorvn her throat, and making her bend to my iron will. He had me
interested, and he knew it."
"This is some serious shit," I spoke after another moment. ,ol,ll need some men for
Inrs ..^"
"Your fabled Zero Squad," Fatty winked at me.
'oThat's right," I nodded, impressed that he had obviously done his homework.. ..I get
one million; my first lieutenant Killjoy gets a half mil; each man gets a quarter."
"And how many men will you need?" Fatty didn't even bat an eyelash when he heard my
price.
"At least 25 if you want the job done right."
"2 5?" Dragoncock exclaimed.
17

"You can pay me, or let Snaildick here handle it," I smirked. "Although I guess you already
considered that option, which is why I'm sitting here." I paused. "That's my offer. I don,t dicker.
You have three more seconds to consider it.,,
"You will have your money," Fatty didn't even drop a beat. "But, you will be accompanied by
Dragoncock in order that we may keep track of our investment.,'
From the tone ofhis voice, I knew this was non-negotiable, a necessary evil, ifyou
will. I thought of the money and the tight teenage pussies that awaited me. 'oOkay,
you've got a deal." Like I said, I enjoy my work.
44. In December,2011, Plaintiff asked the ED administrators to delete the ED page,
which prompted them to taunt him that the serverrs real address is hidden behind its proxy host,
CloudFlare, of California, and to effectively threaten to attempt to make Plaintiff homeless
should he frle suit, with the following threatening e-mail:
Please delete the infringing hate page about me on your site (thanks!)
312011 6:11:55 A.M. Eastem Daytight Time
* BettorOffSinsle@aol. com
from the lnternet (Details)
I think we will post some of your fanfic to your neighbors. A few
hundred copies per house should be fine. It's also against the law to
write stories involving underage girls. welcome to the sex offenders
registry.
iE
ff
r4iity
- /=\ ;t:J
ffi
&$yttt
i::3,
*u:*
iiii l
,{1b1
E:*U
v
Hll #ll @
45. The ED page has been linked to or referenced by many of Plaintiffs political
adversaries, including notable "revenge porn" advocates Adam Steinbaugh and Amanda
18

Levendowski,bothiuris doctors. The existence of the ED page has isolated Plaintiff to the point
where interacting with others risks violent vigilante "justice"; he has often contemplated suicide,
though has no plan or intent (his COPD would seem to allow him to off himself in Oregon).
46. At the time of publication, Defendant either knew or should have known that plaintiff
did not author this essay. It was authored by athirty-eight year-old man from Massachusetts
named David Clanton, a gymnastics groupie who was enlisted, in exchange for personal access
to the MagniJicent Seven and other elite gymnasts, via a female coach named Linda McNamara,
who admitted a few years ago in an article that she covered up sexual abuse in the gym where
she worked, run by disgraced elite coach Don Peters. McNamara had taken it upon herself to
attempt to discredit Plaintiffs claims that Olympic gymnast Dominique Moceanu had been
abused, orgaruzinga group of fans, including Clanton, who would call itself the Gymnastics
MaJia.
47. The male Mafia members were given duties that included a) sending a computer virus
to Plaintiff b) threatening violence and death against Plaintiff and his mother; and c)
impersonating Plaintiff online and making sexualized comments to gymnasts in order to shift
the blame to Plaintifl who survived any and all investigations into his conduct, as he is simply
not a pedophile and was merely seeking to stop child abuse.
48. In late 1997, Clanton taunted Plaintiff that he had impersonated Plaintiffs late mother,
Penny Parker, twice, on USENET, in a manner which has subsequently sent men to prison:
19

Post #l:
CucryIe
Search for topics -l q
Show oDly message
Subject: Use my mouth! I !
Date.= L99] l12lLB
Message-ID: *1,/1
x-Deja-AN: 29979647L
X-XS4AIL-DaIe: Thu, 18 Dec 1,997 02:44:10 CET
Content-Type : text/plain
organization: Replay and Company Unlimited
X-001: This message was forr.rarded by an automated remailing service-
X-0O2: No attempt was made to verify the senderrs identity,
X-003: Please report misuse to
Nelrsqroups : a.Lt . personals , bondage
Hello sugar,
You like getti-ng blowjobs, and I NEED to fee]- your hot hard manhood in
my mouth! ! Call {2151 386-7366 (Phifade}phia PA) and ask for Penny-
You'll NEVER find a girl more eager to suck, or more grateful for the
opportunity to swa11ow.
Penny Parker
4247 locust St. # 806
Philadelphia, PA 191O4
CaII me. use me! Irm HORNY! l!! l!!!!!!!l
ps://groups.google.
Retrieved June 11, 2015 2:07 arrr
20

ffi https://groups-goog1... P - I 0
Post #2:
fi*#
Erom: "Penny Parke.r"
subject: Thirsty slave seeks Master
Date: L991/L2/LA
Message-ID: *1/1
x-Deja-AN:2993453?5
x-xS4AIL-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 1997 15:38:21 CET
Content-Type: text/p]ain
organizati-on: Replay and company Unl,imited
x-OO1: Ttrls message was forwarded kry an automated remailing service-
X-OO2: No attempt was made to ver1fy the senderrs identity.
x-OO3: Please report mj-suse to
Newsgroups: al.t - personals. bondage
HelLo, Sir"
I am a slave qirf in desperate need of discip].ine and the cum of a big
strong man- or, better yet, l4EN! ! ! ! !
I am available day oR night. anytime you or your friends brant to use a
qirl with a severe semen jones- Come by ANYTIME, I liwe in the Eaj-rfax
Apartments, Locust Street, Philadelphia, Apartment No- 806.
Feel free to call me at (215) 386-7366. I donrt usua1fy read email from
this address, becauae of alL the junk that comes in. But PLEASE PLEASE
PLEASE feef free to calf Ine" Me and my mouth are at your disposa]-.
Slave Penny
Retrieved June I l, 2015 2:10 an
49. Plaintifl who quickly posted a response to the first message, warning men not to call,
knows exactly how many did so anyway, because he answered each call;four. The purpose of
the ad was to drive Plaintiffs mother -- like the astrologer Defendant, a Taurus born in mid-May
-- into evicting her caregiver son, so as to cut off his internet access. Further playing to the
stereotype of the loser-who-lives-with-his-mother by Clanton and other Mafia males included
false claims that Plaintiff was on welfare and food stamps. In reality, Plaintiff had grown up
well-off on the Upper East Side of New York, and had long since tired of using money and status
to win the approval of individuals like Clanton.
2t

50. The purpose of the female Mafia members, most notably McNamara and Pearson, was
to make false allegations against Plaintiff, and to enlist the males in various tasks to intimidate or
harm Plaintiff, all in the rutme of covering up the Moceanu abuse story. When Moceanu ran
away in October, 1998, this conflict effectively ended, though various skirmishes would continue
through the 2000 Olympics.
51. In the section of the ED page entitled Ray's Self-Proclaimed Careers, any job or
business engaged in by Plaintiff is defaulted to scam status, further evidence that Plaintiff is just
an overall fraud:
th€ past, Gordon has clalmed to bot
E pro gymnastics coach - Clalms to train s8veral gymnasts online
n Pro chsss player and/or dress coach - only a hlt shy of bs{omln6 World Champlon.
le be lntorns*onally rankad Noto: tho USCF has N0 listlng of hlm on their wshsltE. t
lnformatlon yyo h6ve, Rat's old ratingsxbt& but his msmbsrship ls not currBnt
p Pro handleapper and oddrmaker - Accordlng to hie web sits
"
Pro finance market anallu€r - According to hii ry$b site
s Pro relatlonships adviser -Teaches men 'how to get laidr
o Pro hypnotist and hypnosis in$tructor - Harasses and bsd mouths female hypnotists
o Writer - Writes a book sbout ssductlon, horse raclng and Dcminlqua Moceanu
s Besl sscretary ln the U$A - But got firad beceuss he wasnt an ioffioe whord'
E PalalogEl- P€nnsylvsnla requlres somo eort of profs$sional cortiflcatlon, but Ray dossnt know
that.
o ActMst aElainst chlld abuse snd soxual harassmont - Claims that Smnastacs coaches ars ehild
ebusers
Ir Professional psychic . And still doasn'l have a clue about the Edltorial Staff of I
o Civil Rigrrts Activi$t - Clalms th€t hiring dlBcriminoiion hss prsvonted him from
Flled sult agninst UPenn. Hmmm,,.
a Journallst - Not accrodltod by any nems agjenry, though.
a Softwcre Compeny CEO & entreplenaur - Own company, ol course
n Successful buslnese owner - Also known as broko. and fllod banlauptcy ln 1I)97.
E
E
n
tr
E
Body bulldor - And sf coura.e extremely good looklnd
Jasus Chmt. Only ln psst llfo though.
Skllled Hypnotlet - Oalms to be abls to rGaln TOTAL $oxuel Control! owr women
Source: ED PAGE, Retrieved June 9,2015
22

52. At the time of publication, Defendant either knew or should have known that
numerous of the above statements conceming Plaintiff are false and/or misleading, to the point
of portraying Plaintiff in a false light. Plaintiff has a 4.0 GPA from a year at SUNY, his USCF
rating peaked at Expert (90th percentile) within two years of his first tournament game. Plaintiff
coached the 1990 Parkway Gamma High School from an 0-3 record when he got them, to a 5-5
finish, third place, and a 9-1 crushing win over third-ranked Washington to close the year. He
has given paid psychic readings (Defendant does similar and is not mocked), has produced
hypnosis mp3 recordings that have grossed five figures, grew up among a home-based
transcription service which was the largest in NYC at its peak in 1979, has designed popular and
profitable methods for rating horse races and sports teams, types 100 wpffi, has worked for years
as a high-leveI secretary and paralegal, and published an article about the Moceanu abuse case in
1995, and again in 1997,long before the truth was known to the public.
53. At the time of publication, Defendant either knew or should have known that the
imputation of unauthoizedparalegal practice upon Plaintiff is false, although an investigative
reader would quickly verifi, that Pennsylvania has no such restrictions, contrary to the claim.
RavFAO: 1999-2014
54. Even after Moceanu's scandal resolved, the RayFAQ continued to follow Plaintiff
wherever he went online, including allseduction.fast, Ground Zerc for the intemet "pickup
artist' (PUA) movement,populaized by Neil Strauss's The Game (2005) and VH-l's The
Pickup Artist In tow from alt.sports.gtmnastics car.,rc Thom E. "Subzero" Geiger (Posting as
SubZer0@freon.net), who registered the domain ray-gordon.com, where he ultimately hosted the
RayFAQ, but only after he was banned from hosting it on the server of hardcore white-
23

supremacist group The Order Of White Knights. "Subzero" is not to be confused with the "zero
squad" referenced in the rapelmurder essay.
55. Immediately upon publication of Outfoxing The Foxes, Plaintiff became a target for
defamation in the USENET group allseduction.fast (ASF), Ground Zero for the internet "P[JA"
movement which would mainstream in 2005 with Neil Strauss's The Game. This was
painstakingly detailed in Plaintiffs RICO claims in Parker v. Learn The Skills Corp. (I-[D, (case
cites omitted). Leading the charge from alt.sports.gymnastics was Geiger, who originally
claimed his wife, Susan, was so enraged by Plaintiffs postings that Geiger was spuffed into
action. Joining Geiger on ASF was Derek "Odious" Trunk, the group's self-proclaimed "FAQ
administrator," and an internet right-hand to Ross Jeffries, another PUA guru featured in The
Game, a teacher of NLP seduction, or the use of covert hypnosis to seduce women.
56. On ASF, the RayFAQpage had morphed from its original pu{pose in the gyrnnastics
community, to a robo-defamation machine which conferred Section 230 immunity on anyone
who linked through it to ray-gordon.com, including Geiger (or so he claimed), the sole individual
Plaintiff could sue directly, in Columbus, Mississippi. Geiger had repeatedly threatened Plaintiff
with physical violence, making it terrifying for Plaintiff to file suit in Mississippi; he instead
pursued a RICO action in this district (Pa*eIr-LISq D, which failed.
57. Beginning in 2001, aman later identified as John J. Tashjian ("JJT") began posting to
ASF, repeatedly linking to the RayFAQ, and eventually claimed the RayFAO.com domain when
Plaintifffinally abandoned it. In conjunction with Trunk (Odious), Geiger, and others on ASF
loyal to Jeffries, they disrupted every thread to which Plaintiff would post, in order to destroy his
ability to communicate with his fan base, and to defame him at every turn.
24

58. Tashjian's many threats against Plaintiff are already canonized in the Parker v. LTSC
trilogy. Typical of his conduct, which includes thousands of similar postings all tarring Plaintiff
while linking to the RayFAQand Google-bombing his birth nzlme, was the following (split into
parts):
Search for topics *l C-
Shouonly message
Path: g2newsl.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!borderl.nntp.dca.giganews,
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 20:50:49 -0500
Erom: j jt
Newsgroups: aLt.support.lonelinessralt.support.shynessrsoc.women'soc.singlesralt.
Subject: Re: Another single mother whore
Date: Tue, 07 ilun 2005 2I:55:00 -0400
Organization: Your Red I'ilagon
RepIy-To: Diddy-wah-Diddy
Mes sage-ID : < r}j cal-9 62 4j o4 6br3 j 7bh6s 94a7ohoe7 1 j B 4ax. com>
References :
X-Newsreader: Eorte Agent 2.O/32. 652
Mll"iE-Version: 1 . 0
Content-Type: text/plaini charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding : Tbit
Lines:123
X-Trace : sv3-iERgArTQsAaKgtX/pqOGg19Bb9 1MO9JHzD13VRC4i
' X-Complaints-To: ab...Ggiganells-com
x-DMcA-Notif ications : http : / /wr+w. gl ganews . com/ inf o./dmca . html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of AIL headers
X-Ahuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1 - 3. 32
Xref: g2news1. google. com alt. support. loneliness:26330 alt. support. shyness:97 019 soc.
>Very touching.
Nasty shit. I post it only because Gordon Roy Parker
has threatened me, my familyr my friends, both on and
25

Search for topics
- | q
Show oflly message
MY sin. - I came on]-ine to talk ak)out my romaflce, and he
went, what; ls now known as "..grp ie-." Records show a1f..
..itrs tris own posts.-not my vjiews. He tried to nuke them-.
..1 have EVERYBODYTS posts for years-. He couldnrt run away fast enough..
He has known my home addres.s (I posted it here often) and has
called me John Doe *17. He tras threatened my parents, my friends,
THEIR CHILDREN ! ! ! ! I, and UNKNOIJCN CHII.DREN NOT INVOI,VED IN his fantasy.
*f* Talked to His tlonor Judge Kelly- I doubt id grp-ie ever dj-d.
Notice I se1dom post "..on t:opj:c--" here, itrs not *I{Y* red wagon,
I feel that till grp-ie stops threatening me et all, and allows me
to answer his threats 84 a "..fuckinr judge./court--" like he has BEGGED
to happen for D-E C A-D-E s-- .fust- what IZ stopping t,he gut-1ess coward--?
His o!'rn biqi mouth, his or,rn Lhreats, hi.s persona]. herpes 1nfested cake-hole..
hle have met in person. Euz spit on him. He fras video of hj-s momie..
-.and the REAL hot babe !'rho threw the drink in his face. I trave it on
my desktop-. grp-i,e, you need "..Curves." U is getting fat & stupid.
TeIl ttle world, ctri]-d molester-.why have you never suede Fuz da' Bun..?
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!originaValt.support.loneliness/QflJGMkCXgVQ/Z3eLO6qJiJoJ
Retrieved June 11, 2015 2:22 am
59. On July 7,2010, Tashjian threatened to "bitchslap the dogfuck out of' Plaintiff leave
him in a wheelchair, and "maybe film it":
26

Gt:ngle
Search fcr topics I Cl" Bettor---
rtt
T:I
raa
@
Groups
l
Harun al Rashid Raycordon wrote: Snno
g
JJrj
Re: UGLY
3[7nA
>> I never said I 'was hiring 2 ment to beat you up and would vicleotape if-
>The cat{ot-the-keyboarcl excuse! Too bad the messages say otherwise-
>Now that he knows he's fucked, he's gonna keep backpedaling- Won't do
>him any good, hwoever- He will have brought every last legal
>consequence upon himself, and there's not a THING he can do to stop
>it. He knows this.
Here is the message: I stated:
>> >Everybody knows you iust post this crap to piss others off, and in my case,
>> >you did years ago. Next time I see you in person, I WLL bitch slap the
>> >dogfuck out of you- Maybe break a leg or arm. Maybe iust have someone
>> >else do it. Maybe film it. Maybe buy the wheelchair you will be lefi in.
And itstrue, NEXTTIME ISEEYOU lN PERSON,lwill
bitchslap the dogfuck out of you. Then it's maybe maybe maybe-
NO 2 men'. lF you are so afraid, why not call the police NOW! ?
https://groups.google.com/forum,/#!search/JJT$20threat$20beat$20me$2Oup$20video/alt.seduction.fast/TZYeSOkY_I4lPjdQPTGjH3AJ
*^**3:;tr;:t'::r;#:ir,fiy:'{:;;'#'**^
60. This was far from the only threat from Tashjian (this Complaint would run flve
thousand pages if it included everything), who had claimed to have Plaintiffs mother on video.
Tashjian's relatives include prominent attorneys and municipal employees (retired) in Worcester,
not far from Clanton's Boston-area residence at the time. Tashjian is apparently on disability and
"judgment-proof " a perfect beard for more powerful, more sinister forces.
61. In2004, JJT posted repeatedly that he had been contacted by "folks" about making a
movie concerning Plaintiff:
27

Gmcrgle
Search for iopics - | q.
Re: ..Update on the movie....
>then some good peopie (self included i hope) can make a documentary movie
>about your internet ramblings, make a fortune doing so, and you won't be
>able to do anything about it except cry.
l've been getting email about the movie. Here's an update:
The folks interested in it have spoken of making it an
animated cartoon/live thing. I havent yet seen the
outline yet, so I dont know what that means. From
what I have heard, the'cartoon'would be based on
the old'Thunderbirds" and'Supercaf' Marionation.
I am NOT joking or making this up, boyz n girls-.
the'staf newsloon will be live, the rea! world: F.A-B / Live .
l've been watching old G/Anderson stufithis week, buying
all the DVDS- AMAZING stuff. Now the G/A people are NOT
involved, this is all iust the talk stage, but GOTO:...-
http://wl,w.sci-ti-on lane-50megs.corn/Features/supermarionation.htm
62. While the ASF extension of the Mafra,linked through Geiger, continued its
harassment of Plaintiff, anonymous postings diverted most ASF traffic to commercial websites
like fastseduction.com, on which a parallel, commercial PUA community was built, with the
public never the wiser regarding the lack of free speech, the stealth marketing, or Plaintiffs early
contributions, due to the perpetual noise and ostracizing on ASF, of which the foregoing is the
mere tip of the iceberg. Once The Game dropped, ASF all but lost relevance to the PUA
community, though it will exist in perpetuity.
63. Also as noted on the ED page, Plaintiffs mother was contacted offline by Trunk, in
April, 2007, by letter, just months prior to her death from cancer in July, 2007 .
28

64. A few days after the first letter, which Plaintiff mentioned on ASF in order to flush out
the author, a second letter arrived, notifying Plaintiff that copies of the second letter were being
circulated around his neighborhood.
65. After Plaintiff published the notice that he had received a "death threat" against his
mother (veiled, a reference to how Plaintiff could not survive financially after her impending
passing), Trunk claimed to have found the letter online, read it, andthatit did not contain any
such threat. Trunk had also continued to link to the RayFAQ,now hosted by Tashjian.
66. On January 26,2010, Plaintiff officially retired as a pickup artist (PUA), published
Bettor Off Single for free, with advertising links to his other writing, on PUA and beyond.
67. Thanks to mass murders by failed PUA (Sodini, Rodger), Plaintiff has been thrust
back into the spotlight, with a new generation of his haters linking to the ED page and the
RayFAQ, with the former updated to reflect Plaintiffs new imputed "failures." Ironically, these
are often anti-PUA feminists who are unwitting pawns of the very men they claim to despise.
Where Are They Now?
68. No one in this drama went on to rescue a drowning Brooke Shields, only to blow the
reward money by hiring Van Halen to play their birthday party,nor, to Plaintiffs knowledge, has
anyone used hot coffee to foil a convenience-store robbery. Instead, the modern internet, and
current events, have, for Plaintiff, just as they have for @AdamFGoldberg, made the past keep
getting clearer every day.
69. As KTLzI-Sb award-winning news desk may have reported, on February 8,2012,5an
Diego resident Derek "Odious" Trunk, the self-appointed anti-pedophilia crusader whose sole
mission on the internet seemed tobe To Catch A Plaintiff, was sentenced to seventy-five (75)
29

months in prison for trafficking in child pornography, an offlense he would not have been able to
commit for as long had he been prosecuted for his conduct towards Plaintiff years earlier:
CHILD EXPLOITATIOFI
02t0&120't2
Sgn-t!_jqgo man seilteilced to 20 years for possessioil
of child pornography
ICE arrests 3 other area defendanh pn unrelated child ponrography charges
SAN DIEGO - A registered sex aflender has heen sentenced to 20 years in federal pnson for
possession of cftild pomognaphy following an inuesligation by U.S. tmmigration and Castorm
Enforrement s (lCE) Homeland Serurity lnvestigations (HSt).
Jeny Louis Tiahrnan, 69, of San Diego, was senlenced Monday in federal murt by U,S. District Court
Judge Roger T- Benitez. At the hearing, Judge Benitez told Tinbrnan, "This is one of tfre lorqest
sentences I have euerimposed, and you si1 are deservirp of it-,'
Tinlsman has been in federal custody since his arrest hy HSI special agents October 19,2010.
Follotring his anel special agents exes.rted a federal search wanant on Tinlsmas's horne comprter
where more than 6{XI images of chitrd pomography were discovered- He pleaded guilg to federal child
pomography charges in December 20tr$,
Tintsman was prevlously mnvided of felony charges lor lerrvd ac{s involvirE two glrls under age tr4 arfi
was listed on ihe Califomia Megan's Lavr registered sex offender database ai the time of his arrest.
'This sentence stnuld serue as a warning to those who seek to victimize and rob young children of
their innocerrce," said Derek Benneq special agenl in cfiarge for HSI San Diego. "HSl will continue to
aggressively hunt dorn chiH predalors who use the lnternet to prcy on m:lnerable children. We will
ensure this $pe of crirninal aclivity is pursued and chiH predators are hetd amuntable for their
despicable behavior.'
According to the court documents, f intsman engaged in an online chatnrith an undercover HSI special
agent whom he thought was the rnother of a se\ren-year-oH daughter. During the chat, llnbrnan
revealed he had a sexual interest in ctrlldren foe and oHer and told the undercover agenl he wanted to
erEage in sexual aondud with frte futitous seven-year-old daughter. He then toH the undercover agent
he had dated the mother of his two pdor victims.
Tintsman's sentencing comes less tfian a week after federal agenb frorn the HSI cybercrimes unit in
San Diego arrested three San Diegoarea mer on federat cfrild pornograptry charges as part of an
ongoing sex predator inuestigation, All three were taken into custody for possessftrn of child
pomography and willbe proomuted in lederal aourt
The indiuiduals arrested are.
. James Achenbach, 52, of Nat&onal City;
. Derek Trunlg 34, of San Diego; and
h@://www.ice.gov/news/releases/san-diego-man-sentenced-20-years-possession-child-pornography
Retrieved June 11, 2015 3:39 am
30

70. Dominique Moceanu later admitted to having been kept in the dark "about a lot of
things" as a teenager. She is now a mother and roving gymnastics coach, and learned not long
ago that she has a biological sister who was born without legs and given up for adoption at birth.
Plaintiff had alleged that Moceanu was pledged by her parents to Bela Karolyi in return for the
latter helping the former escape communist Romania ("An American Slave," USENET,1997).
71. 1n2009, Thom E. Geiger ran as an "indie" for mayor of Columbus, Mississippi...and
lost. He still practices political activism.
72. When we come back, we'll reveal the most interesting Where Are They Now? of all.
COUNT (SUB)ZERO: RICO VIOLATIONS AGAINST NO ONE
73. Plaintiff incorporates by reference, the entire contents of all previous paragraphs, as if
fully stated verbatim herein.
A Friend To All Is A F'riend To None
74. One of the silent partners of the Gymnastics Majia was a teenager who went by the
handle Merlock06@ aol. com.
75. On December 14,7997, while Plaintiffs mother was being impersonated by Clanton
and or Merlock and the MaJia, in exchange for celebrity access to sexually abused gymnasts,
Plaintiff posted a "protective" warning message to alt sports.gtmnastics, concerning Merlock,
which was replied toby MaJia member Kevraxx, likely an alternate identity for Merlock:
31

$earch for topies
rlq
Show unmasked eruil afi reseE
I'ronr kev...8aol.con (Kevruxl
Suhject: Re: Jay ard l,lissy figure out Ray-IIIIAIII
Date: i99?/12/14
Uessage-ID: d9971214075301.CnA02570Bladder0l,news.aol,con)#111
X-neja-AI{: 298031898
References :

Guug}*
Search for topics
-l q
Show unmasked email addresses
Eromr merl.,.
Subject: Re: *0ff Topicr I!1 with Ray
Date:1998/06/29
Message-ID:

Seareh for toPics
"l q
show unmasked €mail addrcsses
&#Jfi;;*- ',i.*.-p..pre really are in the line of work you claim to be in.
CYouIn2000: And one lhing they can't stand is a wannabe
iiouln2000: 5o when you {et a-n education on how things are done on that
side of the fence, donrt lrhine to me'
iioorrrZOOOt I wouLd suggest you not try that stunt on anyone else because
others would be far less tolerant of it than I'
CYouIn2000:Andthatisfriendlyadvice.eventhoughyouarenrtdeserving
of any.
cYour;2000: Good boY. StaY quiet'
CYouIn2000: You need to if you don't want further problems'
tIerlock06: HAHAHA i was woidering do you think its heatthy to talk to
yourself?
CYouIn2000: You donrt get it
CYouIn2000i If you are lucky you never will get it
!terlock06:
CYouIn2000: Oh I have a clue
CYouIn2000: You don't
CYouIn2000: Your protection has the opposite effect
you have no clue myfriend" - but youll learn soon enough
;i;;i;r000, Anything that happens to me happens to them 10 times norse
CYouIn2000: You call that an even trade be ny girest
Merl,ock06:goooyoutlneeditllAllAllAYoudolrhatyouhavetodoandil}do
what i have to do remenber that SON"
!lerlock06: this book is shut
CYouIn2000: You 3til1 don't get it
Merlock06: ciao
CYouIn2000: But You uill
CYouIn2000: You're a goner
CYouIn2000: LegaIlY
CYouIn20003 sorrY l-ittle nan
CYouIn2000: Thinis he can scare people with that mouth'
CYouIn2000: You know you don't have a Ieg to stand on
CYouIn2000: Pathetic geek
cyouln2000: you,re a iot rLore intelligent vhen you say nothing.
CYouIn2000: AII you do is hurt those girls with your words'
cYouln2000: You ran your mouth before Iike this, renember?
CYouIn2000: Once I forgave; twice no way'
cioufrrZOOO: By the urayi you'll be putting your friends in prison possibly
PartZ Above
34

Sear*h for topics
,lq
Showonlymessqe
Show unmashed email addresses
CYouIn2000: 0nce I forgave; twice no way'
cyouln2000: By the way, you'1l be putting your friends in prison possibly
this tine.
cyouln2000: And they'tl be the ones who get you in trouble to save
themselves.
Herlock06: You wanna kaow what i find funny. Is lrn right you ale
dellusional your having an imaginary conversation with me when im not even
saying anything LOI
CYouIn2000: Youtre the delusional one
CYouIn2000: You can't stoP anYthing
CYouIn2000: I know it annoys you to be so powerless
MerLock06: hahahaha
CYouIn2000: You had manY chances
CYouIn2000: StuPid geek
CYouIn2000: All you did was speed up the lawsuit
CYouIn2000: Your protection is the nost dangerous thing your friends have'
CYouIn2000: To themselves.
CYouIn2000: You speak for them when you try to be a terrorist
cyouln2000: Try to find more productive outlets for your jealousy next
tfune.
cyouln2000: It,s not rny fault you aren't even 1 percent of the man I am.
CYouIn2000: You said aII the same words months ago
CYouIn2000: l,ook at aII that good it did you
cyouln2000: oh well I best be going nora. Try your wannabe tactics on
someone who isnrt already what you "wannabe.' It's a lot less risky. Bye,
.Ieff .
Herlock06: hahahahahahaha feel pitty for the uneducated ciao
Wannabe"tshizz"
Merlock06: It seemB to me you "WANNABE" alot of things like a qyrnastics
coach of a llorld class g1'mnast and a member of the moceanu family" but
basically you Just dont have it IIAHAIIA
(The bleepis were for Vulgar Ianguage that he used and I find it very EUNNY
that firsi he says im all talk but when i dont say a word he makes up another
excuse.. TRyTNG io find a way around the FEAR well here it is guys! Think what
you wish but rie al"l knor+ the truth
Everyones friend
.Ieff
Part 3 Above
77. This exchange has temporal proximity to the creation of the RayFAQ, and followed
numerous direct, terroristic, and frightening threats made against Plaintiff in an IM, and in the
Gymnastics Chatroom on AOL.
7g. Though Plaintiff said most of the words in the chat, itwas Merlo ck's presence which
did the real talking, revealing his protector role. His lines were straight out of mafia fiction:
35

of story." (Part I)
a) "My friend...you do what you have to do and I'11 do what I have to do period end
b) "hahaha I was wondering do you think it's healthy to talk to yourself?" (Part II)
c) "You do what you have to do and I'11 do what I have to do remember that SON...'
(to the best of his knowledge, Plaintiffs late mother and Merlock never had sex). (II)
d) "You wanna know what I find funny. Is Im right you are dellusional [sic] your
[sic] having an imaginary conversation with me when im not even saying anything LOL." (m)
e) [in response to being called awannabe] "hahahahahahaha feel pitty for the
uneducated Ciao Wannabe "Whizz'. (Plaintiffs AOL name in1996 was WhizardRay) It seems to
me you "WANNABE" alot of things like a gymnastics coach of a World class gymnast and a
member of the moceanu family.. but basically you Just dont have it HAHAHA" (I[)
f) [to the audience]:
(The bleep's were for Vulgar language that he used and I find it very FUNNY
that first he says im all talk but when i dont say a word he makes up another
excuse.. TRYING to find a way around the FEAR well here it is guys! Think
what you wish but we all know the truth Everyones friend Jeff
79. All Plaintiff knew in 1998 was that Merlock lived near...Boston, claimed to be short,
fat, Sicilian, and went by the name Jeff, information not sufficient, even if accurate, to identify
him without subpoena to AOL.
80. Also on Jvre29,1998, Merlock posted the following to USENET:
36

https://groups.google.com/forum/# !original/alt.sports.gymnastics/bAfQhOU6D3o/pNmxelx8iPoJ
Retrieved June 11, 2015 6:2lanr
81. "Vance" refers to Vance Lear, a judgment-proof, homeless member of the Hypnosis
MaJia, based in San Francisco compensated for hiding the true source of internet attacks against
Plaintiff. Vance has falsely claimed a Ph.D. in psychology, and that his late wife, Leslie Harivel,
a big-firm paralegal, was an attorney, an insult to big-firm paralegals everywhere. Just as
Defendant found the ED page a convenient ally, friend-to-all Merlock immediately embraced
37

Vance, who had once threatened to "come after" Plaintiff during a harassing telephone call in
2002. Lear has also claimed to have worked with the world's leading psychiatrists; about this
Plaintiff has absolutely no doubt.
82. Emboldened by his new legal advisor, Vance Lear, Merlock (the webmaster for
several elite "MaJia-protected" gymnasts, and editor of a gymnastics website) forged ahead with
his mission to completely ruin Plaintiff, hopefully to the point of suicide. Merlock's motivation
for this burst ofverbal aggression had been posted one day prior:
firlngtc
Groups
Searchfortopics -l q Bettor...
Show only message
@
-1 Erorn: merl. -.Gaol.com (Merlock06)
I Subject: Re: Why Radio Broadcaster tlannabes Should Not practice
J
Law
Date: 1998 /06128
Message-ID : # 1/1
X-Deja-AN: 366852574
References :

claimed that Plaintiffs claims that Moceanu was being abused were libelous, and that she could
sue him over that (Plaintiff wanted sunlight on the abuse).
84. During one of theirlM sitdowns, Merlock parted with some central wisdom:
ttRevenge has NO time limit," he said. By this, Plaintiff mistakenly believed that Merlock was
referring to there being no limit on how long one could delay exacting revenge, but it appears
Merlock also meant that there was no limit on how long he could ruin Plaintiff for here we are in
2015 with Defendant grinding the eighteen-year-old axe of this thirty-five year-old man who
warned Plaintiff never to forget him as a threat. Heeding this warning, Plaintiff internet-snooped
the Mer1ock06@ao1.com e-mail address, just in case this Merlock loser still held a grudge:
.Iozek I{alitka
jpirx@ccrncast.net
Jozek Kalitka
Mark Kalivas
Mark l(alivas
JeffKalligheri
Jeff Kalligheri
JeffItulligheri
Jeff I(alligheri
.feffKalligheri
jpin

,-
clX
File fdit ldie$r Fayorines Tools
r
r Jeffffielligheri pn Twittefi',..
li{cmmwnitX-ogrlr r
@Em todd mcl6 @d*tstgu' 25 ltla', 2$12
ffi[iffim I fla] lll€ ktd rtq, '$En I$Uno g*E &drt& l*uts{t ruFce{Gaily }E[, TE{r,rE
&& sEc&hlngniysh[fF
{a {5* fr * ta .rl
tlryb o*Hauisheri
$fr* fl g"lcffiaeghari
rnolay haha ld bet rnontsy u arfint
lyimg,lm tfis kid that rnrhen geffililg Into fights
wCIuld s&y "l beat up kids like you on the
way to fiEfih*
{tfif**.
ffi ffi &Effi
,.;fiF.
w& -t W '& *Ll:''#'*
v
85. Plaintiff hears that Kalligheri is physically tough; mostly from Kalligheri, but that's
what he hears. The modern internet tells all: Merlock06@aol.com, a/WaEveryone,s Friend,

furns out to have been Kalligheri, who recently built a strong filming presence in eatar, and
whose most recent film, Big Game, starring Samuel L. Jackson and, athirteen year-old Dutch
actot, has received international critical acclaim. Following is a list of production companies
involved inBig Game:
Production
companies
Distributed by
Altitude Film
Entertainment Ltd
Bavaria Film Partners
Egoli Tossell Film GmbH
Film House Germany
Head Gear Films
Ketchup
Metrol Technology
bzero Fil
Entertainment
VisionPlus Fund I
Waterstone
Nordisk Film Distribution
86. Kalligheri produced this fiIm in partnership with Subzero Film Enturtainment.
87. For this "count to nowhere," Plaintiff asserts a global, association-in-fact zuCO
enterprise based on traditional Sicilian MaJia crime, which also includes international child sex
trafficking, masterminded by proven child-abuse enabler Jeff Kalligheri, and recently furthered
by Defendant's predicate act of extortion in violation of the Hobbs Act. This, however, is no
longer Plaintiffs dogfight, and is set forth solely (as background, not an actualcount) to rebut
Defendant's statements concerning Plaintiff via her link to the ED pa1e,the one Defendant called
research in her second Ripoff Report rebuttal:
41

@ http://wmnr.ripoffreport ..-. I - O
File Edit View Favorites Tools Help
& Ripoff Report I New Age H-..
fl*S
Is There a Report About You!? Watch This 3 Minute Videol
A
#1 REBUTTRL owner of company
To be fair
AUIHOR: Jacqueline - (USAI
SUBMITTED: Monday, June 08,2015
I posted a link about Ray Gordon that lfound online while researching the man
bullying me. He was harassing me and slandering my name repetitivety and making
my life a living hell. I am a healer and a very spiritual person so I feel like I must say
this in good faith. I do not have any evidence that all this information in the link is
e,orrect. I do know that the majority seems to check out.
Respond to this report!
ffi
r' tldi:,.:i
M r-1 \l
File a Rebuftal
a
I
*a
;ifffr'Ei;r,
l-l{"" 1.[
>
v
^ 4:47 AM w
6t1ot2o$ w
88. Defendant notes here that she "[does] not have any evidence that all this information
in the link is correct." Speaking of which:
COUNT ONE: DEF.AMATION (AS PUBLISHER)
89. Plaintiff incorporates by reference, as if fully stated verbatim herein, the entire
contents of all previous paragraphs.
90. The following statements by Defendant are in controversy in this count:
(paragraph 88);
a) The claim that Plaintiffwas "harassing [her] or slandering [her] name"
42

) 1) The contents of both the ED Page and the essay authored by Clanton to which
it links (paragraph 36),2) all factual misstatements from the page noted hereinabove, including
but not limited to Plaintiffhaving authored the essay or being apedophile.
c) All other statements, to the extent they are proven individually defamatory at
trial, or, collectively, that they portray Plaintiff in a false light, bringing shame and disgrace on
he and his family for generations to come.
9I. The statement in 93(a) is false; indeed, it was Defendant who "harassed" Plaintifi
first making him r,ulnerable by posting a powerful hypnosis video, then by breaching the
contract, and then by ignoring his request to cease all contact once fired. Defendant's
protest/warning posts, and his review, were made "on the way out," and did not constitute direct
contact with Defendant, but rather public-square corlmentary. By contrast, Defendant has been
inciting her minions to contact Plaintiff directly, and with threatening hostility:
43

Find tacas, cheap dinner, Max's
l,lear Philadelphia, PA
Home About lih ltYrite a Review Find Friends Messages Talk Events
The P. and Ray G.
You knory what? l'm sick of you. Youle harassed Kismet, Katherine Anne,
Nisiyod and now Jacqueline...
I know all about you and lVe told Jacqueline as such.
You sued Google and lost. You know shit about hypnosis and you live with
your mother at 40 + years old. You have no money.
You post about cyberbullying on yelp, yet that's exacfly what your doing to
Jacqueline. I'm telling everyone in the communig of you're return and fom
now on you wanna pick on someone you freaking lowlife, you pick on me!
G. lfJacqui didn't ask you to contact me, 'you* are the one stalking her by
adelpNa' PA
involving yourself in her life. lf she DID ask you to contact me, she's the
0 4 source slthe conduct.
I'll patiently let the truth reveal ibelf in court.
YeIp Message From rrThe P,
92. The statements on the ED page in 93(b), including but not limited to the claim that
Plaintiff authored the rapelmurder essay, are false and misleading, as set forth inparugraph46.
93. The statements were a) made to third parties, who b) clearly understood their meaning,
c) were not privileged, d) not consented to by Plaintiff, and e) libelousper se. Based on
preponderance of the evidence, f) similarly slanderous statements have been made verbally, by
Defendant, to friends and acquaintances, adding g) slander as an element of this count.
44

94. By endorsing the link to ED, claiming she had performed "research" on Plaintiff rather
than just making a casual link, and saying "most of the information seems to check out,"
Defendant made the ED Page her own, elevating herself to the status of publisher. Alternatively,
Defendant has not proven the third-party origination of the content required for immunity.
95. As set forth hereinabove, Defendants statements run afoul of the Pennsylvania tort of
libel; Plaintiff states this claim for relief on that basis.
96. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's statements, Plaintiff has suffered
irreparable harm, including, but not limited to, pain and suffering, loss of current and retirement
income, fear for his safety at the hands of vigilantes r,vho might "Google" him when encountering
Plaintiff in his daily life, and loss of reputation and social standing.
97. Plaintiff is entitled to a) compensatory damages in an amount to be proven at trial; b)
punitive damages, for Defendant's willful and malicious conduct; and c) injunctive relief
sufficient to terminate the actionable conduct and make Plaintiff whole.
COUNT TWO: DEF,AMATION (AS DISTRIBUTOR)
98. Plaintiff incorporates by reference, as if fully stated verbatim herein, the entire
contents of all previous paragraphs.
Section 230 Constitutional Challense Mini-Memorandum (X'ederal Rule 5.1)
99. Jeff Kalligheri may be everyone'sfriend, but Section 230 is his best friend. To quote
the parrot:
" Rraaaach ! ! Section 23 0 !.....Section 23 0 t....nraaaach ! ! DISMISSED ! ! "
100. This parrot, now extinct in the remainder of the world, where Plaintiff would win this
lawsuit without difficulty in five hundred out of every hundred jurisdictions not named America,
has lobotomized Plaintiffs home-country judiciary, while ignoring two key factors: a) the
45

SCOTUS has never ruled on Section 230; andb) the law, as written, says nothing about
distributor liability. Now, all but the first of an infinite gang of defamers are given a license to
destroy anyone's reputation at will, without consequence, making I heard it on the internet as
absolute a defense as truth, even as one is told not to trust what one reads online.
1 01 . Plaintiff is currently seeking legal representation in Australi a and the United
Kingdom, where judgments for equally defamatory statements run well into the six-figures. He
asks this court to consider why this case would win so easily, so it may address the right to
reputation for which the SCOTUS laid the foundation in Paul v. Davis ,424IJS 693 (1976),
where the dissent said the constitutional right to reputation -- recognizedinthe EU, where the
right to beforgotten exists and even truth is not a defense to defamation -- aheady exists, and
the majority said that a secondary harm, such as the loss of employment to internet-searching,
were presefi; in2015, unlike 1976, secondary, constitutional harm can now be inferred.
102. If Judge Parrot hears this case, surlmarily dismissing it solely because of Section
23},Plai*iff will be relegated to a lifetime of having to answer for decades-old lies which, to
this day, continue to harm his career, chances for regular employment and to fulfill the public
interest of self-sufficiency, and ability to form social and business connections. The public will
continue to simultaneously harmed by deception.
103. Public-interest arguments in favor of Section 230 are wiped by the greater
constitutional interest in truth, an interest which spawns public interests such as the need for
reliable consumer data, also rendered impossible by Section 230's "freedom to lie" interpretation.
Why should a consamer trust any information about any product or service, if no one can be
suedfor lies? Section 230 or not, Defendant accused Plaintiff of pedophilia. Under existing
law in all fifty states, that is actionable defamation, atort developed to replace dueling.
46

-:
104. While this court was threatening Plaintiff with sanctions for suing Google for
distributor libel, Plaintiff had predicted at the time that as more sympathetic targets -- i.e.,
women -- emerged, that legislative judicial gymnastics would ensue. The revenge porn crusaders
have proven this, with entirely new federal laws specifically drafted as an end-run around23},
such as the proposed federal anti-revenge-porn law. The simpler option of fixing 230 inthe first
place for all people has yet to penetrate the public consciousness.
105. For this count, Plaintiff avers identical damages, motivation, and level of malice,
pleading his claim for relief identically to Count One above, except based on distributor liability,
and seeking identical relief.
106. Alternative to the foregoing, Plaintiff asks that this court apply British and Australian
defamation law here, on the grounds ofjudicial economy, and because both parties derive
income from an intemational audience which includes these countries.
COUNT THREE: BREACH OF CONTRACT
107. Plaintiff incorporates by reference, as if fully stated verbatim herein, the entire
contents of all previous paragraphs.
108. A deal is a deul (paragraphs 19-22). Defendant broke the deal (paragraph 24),thus
violating the Pennsylvania tort of Breach of Contract; Plaintiff states this claim for relief on that
basis.
109. This case is analogous to Kim Basinger's having bailed out of Baxing Helena,for
which she paid $3.8 million in settlement.
110. While no distribution rights for either video had been negotiated, for purposes of this
suit, Plaintiff had an audition with Defendant, which, if successful, would have lead to
commercialization of the work, and future projects. Alternatively, even without
47

conrmercialization, the contracted video was to play apivotal role in furthering both the eye and
chess video projects. The breach cost Plaintiff that chance-of-a-lifetime audition, in a manner
which cannot easily be restored.
111. Absent Defendant's breach, Plaintiff would have a chess video for personal use, and
have completed his "audition" for commercial partnership and continuing collaboration.
ll2. Direct restoration of Plaintiff to "whole" status via performance of the contract is not
possible, given what has transpired. Plaintiff estimates that, starting from scratch, it could cost
as much as $325,000.00 to yield a comparable video from a SAG-AFTRA actress with
comparable skill. That this was not a SAG-AFTRA gig is not relevant when calculating the
replacement cost of the breach, especially since Plaintiff had every intention of becoming a
signatory had the need for him to do so arisen.
113. Because the breach was wanton, willful, and intentional, Plaintiff is entitled to
punitive damages, in addition to the compensatory damages outlined hereinabove, and any
injunctive relief necessary to make him whole.
COT]NT FOUR: FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION
1 14. Plaintiff incorporates by reference, as if fully stated verbatim herein, the entire
contents of all previous paragraphs.
ll5. "I am not afettish model!," Defendant cried, oblivious to her spelling eror.
48

116. Defendant could have fooled Plaintiff...indeed, as if mother nature performing tricks
with margarine, she did fool Plaintiff into thinking she was butter. In the course of fooling him,
49

Defendant ran afoul of the Pennsylvania tort of fraudulent misrepresentation; Plaintiff states this
clum for relief onthat basis.
117. Defendarfi, a SAG-AFTRA actress who wouldn't have dreamed of pulling a stunt like
this on a big-studio executive like Jeff Kalligheri, should have known better. Her actions were
intentional and self-serving.
118. But for the fraudulent misrepresentation outlined hereinabove, Plaintiff would have a)
proposed the eye video instead of the "edgier" chess video, and b) not dealt with Defendant via
Customs Club,doing so instead as a regular hypnotherapy/hypnosis client, thus avoiding her
issues withthefettish world of which she claims not to be a part, reality notwithstanding.
119. The damages and remedies pled in Count Three above (paragraphs 107-113) are
identical to those which Plaintiff now sets forth for this Count Four, as if fully stated verbatim.
COUNT F.IVE: DECLARATORY RELIEF
120. Plaintiff incorporates by reference, as if fully stated verbatim herein, the entire
contents of all previous paragraphs.
l2l.Inthe absence of a responsive pleading which includes a counterclaim for defamation,
Plaintiff seeks a declaration that his Yelp! review contains no false and misleading statements
conceming Defendant.
122. Altematively, even if this court finds that there are false and misleading statements in
the Yelp! review, rather than mere opinion, Plaintiff seeks a declaration that he has retracted his
statements, and attempted to mitigate arry and all harm to Defendant (such as with the temporary
five-star review emphasizing only Defendant's induction skills). This court now has apractical,
real-world example of how Plaintiffs speech was chilled by the litigation threat.
50

PRAYER TOR RELIEF
Plaintiff prays to God Almighty, His Son, and the Holy Ghost, but also to this Court, for the
following relief:
1. Compensatory damages in the amount of SIX-HUNDRED SIXTY-ONE
THOUSAND DOLLARS ($661,000.00), including $325,000 for the breach and fraud claims,
and $336,000 for the defamation claims.
2. The maximum punitive damages allowable by law.
3. Costs of suit, including attorney fees, where permiued.
4. An order declaring that Plaintiffs Yelp! review contains no false and misleading
statements concerning Defendant.
5. Absent a timely counterclaim, a "put up or shut up" order barring Defendant from
ever bringing her previously threatened lawsuits, and further deeming any such action, if
permitted, in violation of both the anti-SLAPP laws and the Dragonetti Act.
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Plaintiff demands that the instant action be tried by a competent jury of his civic-minded
peers.
This the l2thday of June,2015
6"a&e eq-*
f r-{
;r',-,
fl*d
.{ .-$re I fu
Gordon Roy Parker, Pro Se
4247 Locust Street, #119
Philadelphia, PA 19104
(267)2e8-12s7
SnodgrassPublish@aol.com
PLAINTIF'F'
51

EXHIBIT A
Plaintiffs Yelp! Review Of Defendant
Hypnosis is a known sexual fetish, which is why athactive female hypnotists can write their own ticket. Jacquie has
provable ties to the hypnofetish community. See her interview at the "Girls And Corpses Graveside Zombie
*Fetish* event from 2013:
[external link redacted]
She and Hypnotist Joel Silver performed at the Girls And Corpses Spring Issue 2013 Premier And Hypnosis Show:
[external link redacted]
Jacqui has also said she has performed at"grad nights." There are MINORS at those shows. Would anyone want a
male hypnofetishist hypnotizing their underaged daughters? It's not that Jacqui herself is a problem per se, but the
hypnosis she performs triggers fetishes in 4-6 percent of the population, more at a show.
Any woman intelligent enough to hypnotize people on stage is more than intelligent enough to know she's turning
on almost every male who falls under her spell. Beauty itself is hypnotic, and adds to the trance, even if the
ostensible purpose is therapeutic. As a general rule, it is wise to keep the lines between stage hypnosis, fetish
hypnosis, and therapeutic hlpnosis well-drawn; this is why I never became a hypnotherapist.
After finding a very powerful induction (and very sexy, replete with phone-sex voice and dominant overtones), from
Jacqui on YouTube, I tried to see if she had any videos for sale on the clips site. It is there that I found this highly
trained SAG actress (all of which make for vastly superior hypnotists) had apage on "Customs Club," a website for
custom fetish hypnosis videos. I offered Jacqui $1,000 to perform a sexy induction with deep mind control, for the
purpose of helping my chess (by Eing the motivation to win to getting a beautiful woman, and through the
rejuvenative effects ofthe hypnosis itself). She accepted my offer, but I had sent a duplicate and asked her to clear
that up by e-mail. Jacqui's response to my e-mail was a request for me to pay her by PayPal, which would have
risked my account, as they don't allow adult transactions, and it would have required me to cut out Customs Club,
which was not fair to them.
I immediately declined the transaction, and was no longer comfortable dealing with Jacqui, who put me in a bad
position since now she is useless to me as a hypnotist, as I didn't trust what she had done, and other hypnotists are
useless because they lack her extreme level of talent and training. It's like hypnosis suddenly becomes a drug you
know isn't the strongest. Hypnosis's fatal flaw is that other people control its dosage. In this case, I have to use what
my brain knows to be inferior hypnosis while patiently waiting for a superior hypnotist to come along, what could
be a long wait though I'm guessing Jacqui's ultimate gift to me will be the hundreds of copycats who come around
later. Someone who claims to understand artists didn't do a good job in my case, and I would rather have never seen
her hypnosis at all than to be bait-and-switched in what I consider such a dishonest manner. Is she talented?
Extremely. Would I recommend letting her inside your head? Never. I've been doing hypnosis since I was eight.
Hypnotists like Jacqui are gteat if they like you or want something, and can be a psyche-injuring nightmare
otherwise. She crossed into a seriously controversial gray area when she put up that fetish video page as well. A
male hypnotherapist with a similar duality would be met with skepticism at best.
Technically speaking, she has a "theoretical seal" based on my perception of her ability that will not be broken until
a superior trance is induced. I've been through this before; the longest I had to wait for one to break was nine years.
Because a hypnotist is not obligated to work on a subject, there is no penalty for leaving one sealed, but there should
be. Anyone who can hypnotize you can seal you, intentionally or unintentionally, and if they do, you are at their
mercy. You've seen how she behaved in that position with me. I cannot speak for what she would do with anyone
else.