Kangaroo-Courts
Kangaroo-Courts
Kangaroo-Courts
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Kangaroo</strong> <strong>Courts</strong>?<br />
26<br />
investigation and concluded that he was not involved in the terrorist attacks. Despite this,<br />
on a variety of occasions, Asad alleged that harmful comments had been made in his<br />
presence, stating that his trip was “suspicious” and accusing him of conferring with the<br />
terrorists prior to the attack. These allegations were later denied by the employees that<br />
were alleged to have made the remarks.<br />
In March 2003, Asad’s employment with Kinexus was terminated. Asad then filed a<br />
complaint with the BC Human Rights Tribunal (BCHRT) claiming that Kinexus had<br />
“discriminated against him with respect to his employment and terminated that<br />
employment because of his race, religion, place of origin, and political belief.” Asad<br />
complained that the comments made by his colleagues created a poisoned work<br />
environment that eventually led to his termination. Asad’s complaint also alleged that the<br />
employer discriminated against him by refusing to instruct Asad’s colleagues that Asad<br />
was to be presumed innocent of the allegations.<br />
In July 2008, the BCHRT agreed with Asad and ordered Kinexus to pay him $11,000. It<br />
should be noted that the BCHRT found that Kinexus had fired Asad because of “personal<br />
priorities and commercial reasons,” and thus did not discriminate against him in this<br />
instance.